No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aviata At Fletcher

518 W Fletcher Ave, Tampa, FL 33612 · For profit - Individual · 120 certified beds · (813) 265-1600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Aug 2024Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)2 immediate-jeopardy citations$57,962 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Aug 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • inspectors cited 2 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $57,962 in federal fines (most recent 2024-10-24)
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1323 W Fletcher Ave Ste B · (813) 999-2188 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
320 W Fletcher Ave · (813) 971-8401 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
150 W Fletcher Ave · (813) 933-3105 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 2 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.2%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.1%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.5%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%2.5%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.6%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.9%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.2%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control9.7%10.5%21.2%typical for the state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table8.9%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.8%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine95.6%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission37.0%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit9.1%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.222.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.881.151.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

51.3%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
53.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.36U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.16hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 53.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 80 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 61% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF51.3%CMS range 36.2–65.551.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.9%CMS range 6.5–15.410.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge53.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge56.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge38.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified94.2%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.6%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.7%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization8.6%CMS range 4.8–14.97.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.021.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.61
RN hours/ resident / day
0.66
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.30
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.49
RN hoursweekends
52.6%
Total nursing turnover
61.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.0 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 6 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.30 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.61 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.07 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.66 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 53% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

8
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-07-11)
8
at the previous standard inspection (2022-04-21)

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 22 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-21 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from deprivation of goods and services, by staff failing to provide one resident (#1) with Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) per the resident's wishes out of eight residents sampled for advance directives. On [DATE] at approximately 3:00 a.m., Resident #1 became unresponsive during routine care. Nursing staff assessed Resident #1 and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was called to the facility. Prior to EMS arrival, nursing staff reviewed the medical record and determined Resident #1 had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order. Nursing staff provided oxygen at a high concentration via mask, and sternal rubs were intermittently applied with no response from the resident. The EMS team arrived and conducted an initial assessment. Resident #1 was noted with no heart rate and no respirations and was pronounced deceased at 3:29 a.m. At 3:40 a.m., nursing discovered the DNR order in Resident #1's chart belonged to Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2024-08-21 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
    Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was performed according to the resident's expressed Advance Directive to honor their rights and professional standards for one resident (#1) out of eight residents reviewed for advance directives. On [DATE] at approximately 3:00 a.m., Resident #1 became unresponsive during routine care. Nursing staff assessed Resident #1 and Emergency Medical Services (EMS) was called to the facility. Prior to EMS arrival, nursing staff reviewed the medical record and determined Resident #1 had a Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order. Nursing staff provided oxygen at a high concentration via mask, and sternal rubs were intermittently applied with no response from the resident. The EMS team arrived and conducted an initial assessment. Resident #1 was noted with no heart rate and no respirations and was pronounced deceased at 3:29 a.m. At 3:40 a.m., nursing discovered the DNR order in Resident #1's chart belonged to Resident #11, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-07 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure medical records were complete and accurate related to alleged incidents of abuse and neglect for three residents (#3, #8, #9) of five sampled residents.Findings included: On 01/07/2026 at 10:00 a.m. Resident #3 was observed sitting in his wheelchair in the hallway. He described an incident that had occurred during medication administration with the night nurse. He stated he knew his insulin orders and that he gets a fast-acting type of insulin. Resident #3 stated Staff A, RN (Registered Nurse), disagreed and told him, Don't tell me how to do my job. Staff A, told him, EXPLICIT. Resident #3 stated Staff A kept coming back and harassing him. The resident stated he reported the incident to the administration.Review of Resident #3's medical record revealed he was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses included but not limited to osteomyelitis, diabetes, mood (affective) disorder, history of falling, hypertension, lymphedema, and acquired absence of left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for three residents (#4, #5 and #6) of three sampled residents.Findings included: 1. Resident #4 was admitted on [DATE], readmitted on [DATE] and discharged on [DATE]. Review of the admission Record showed diagnoses included but were not limited to cerebrovascular disease, atrial fibrillation, diabetes, anemia in chronic kidney disease, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder, stage IV chronic kidney disease, hypertension, stage III sacral pressure ulcer, stage III left heel pressure ulcer, and urine retention. Review of the quarterly, Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] showed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 14 or cognitively intact. Review of the Section GG, Functional Abilities showed the resident was dependent for toileting, showering and bathing. Section J showed he had no pain for last 5 days. Review of the physician orders showed: Morphine Sulfate concentrate oral solution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to notify the physician a medication error had occurred for one resident (#5) out of four residents sampled.Findings included: On 09/30/2025 at 1:00 p.m , Resident #5 was observed lying down in bed with her call light within reach. She was observed with no signs of distress. She said approximately 2 weeks ago the nurse assigned to their room gave her, her roommate's medication and gave her roommate her medication. She said she did not have any negative effects, but she thought it was strange it happened. Resident #5 said she was not able to remember what medication was given to her, but she thinks she received 3 Tylenol tablets and 1 Gabapentin tablet. Review of an admission Record dated 09/30/2025 revealed Resident #5 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to unspecified open wound of abdominal wall, unspecified quadrant without penetration into peritoneal cavity, subsequent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice related to the administration of Vancomycin. The facility failed to obtain and follow physician orders for Vancomycin laboratory services, and failed to report laboratory results to the physician and pharmacy for one resident (#2) of two residents sampled.Findings included: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 07/25/2025. Review of the admission Record showed diagnoses included but not limited to cellulitis of right lower limb and left lower limb, non-pressure chronic ulcer of left calf with fat layer exposed, non-pressure chronic ulcer right calf, diabetes, polyneuropathy, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), muscle weakness, hypertension, encounter for therapeutic drug level monitoring, end stage renal disease (ESRD), anemia, edema, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), gastrostomy, myocardial infarction, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to implement their Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, & Misappropriation Policies and Procedures regarding a failure to attempt to verify information from former employers prior to hire for one (Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant) of four sampled staff members. Findings Included: Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation, & Misappropriation policies and procedures, Document Name N-1265, effective 11/30/2024, last reviewed 11/16/2022, documented in Policy: It is inherent in the nature and dignity of each resident at the center that he/she be afforded basic human rights, including the right to be free from abuse, neglect, mistreatment, exploitation and/or misappropriation of property. The management of the facility recognizes these rights and hereby establishes the following statements, polices, and procedures to protect these rights and to establish a disciplinary policy, which results in the fair and timely treatment of occurrences…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-09 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment and care for management of pain was provided in accordance with professional standards of practice for one resident (Resident #7) of three residents sampled for pain management. Findings included: Review of Resident #7's admission Record revealed an admission date of 11/3/2009 and a readmission date of 7/1/2023. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of spinal stenosis, morbid severe obesity, chronic pain syndrome, and intervertebral disc disorders, lumbar region. Review of Resident #7's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed under Section H - Health Conditions, Resident #7 was on a scheduled pain medication regimen and received PRN (as needed) pain medications within the five day assessment period. Section H of the Assessment also revealed Resident #7 experienced pain almost constantly, which occasionally affected her sleep and day-to-day activities. Review of Resident #7's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accuracy of the medical record by failing to document administration of medications for one resident (Resident #7) of three residents sampled for pain management. Findings Included: During an interview on 12/9/2024 at 9:30 a.m., Resident #7 stated she was recently admitted to the hospital because during morning medication pass, her face turned blue. She stated on 11/23/2024, in the morning, she had just removed her oxygen mask when the nurse came into provide her with her medication. Resident #7 stated she took the medication and immediately her face turned blue, and the nurse had to call other staff members into the room. She stated she remembers the Director of Nursing (DON) coming in and calling the physician so they could send her to the emergency room (ER), and she remembers being in an ambulance with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) staff trying to keep her awake. Resident #7 stated when she got to the ER, they took for a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow food menus for two (#4 and #5) of two sampled residents and failed to act upon the grievances of the Resident Council Committee related to food menus. Findings included: During an interview and observation on 10/24/2024 at 9:15 a.m., Resident #5 was sitting in her bed looking at her breakfast in a Styrofoam container. Resident #5 stated she did not get on her tray what was on the menu slip. The slip with her name on it showed Thursday Breakfast 10/24/2024: Double Protein, buttermilk pancakes - 4 each; Margarine - 2 each; Syrup - 2 each; Bacon - 2 slices; Hot Cereal - 6 oz; milk - 8 oz; orange juice - 4 oz; coffee or hot tea-6 oz. Resident #5 stated and on observation she had scrambled eggs, and an untoasted English muffin and oatmeal. Resident #5 stated she got her juice and no milk. She did not get any meat; she was supposed to get bacon. She stated this happened often, what was on the slip was not what she got. Resident #4, Resident #5's roommate, stated she also did not get what was on her menu slip.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-24 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and implement a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Program that demonstrated identification, monitoring and implementation of an effective action plan to correct citations related to failing to follow food menus for four residents (Resident #4, Resident #14, Resident #15, and Resident #16) of five sampled residents, failing to act upon the grievances of the Resident Council Committee related to food menus, and failing to collaborate with the Registered Dietician related to menu substitutions (F565) during the revisit survey conducted on 12/9/2024. Finding included: Review of the facility's policy titled Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement, revised 10/24/2022, showed the Center and organization has a comprehensive, data-driven Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Program that focuses on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of care and quality of life. Procedure: Program Design and Scope: 1. The Center's QAPI program is on-going comprehensive review of care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and determine it was safe for a resident to self-administer medications for one (#2) of three sampled residents related to nebulizer treatments. Findings included. During interview and observation on 10/24/2024 at 9:15 a.m., Resident #2 was sitting at the bedside in a wheelchair eating. She was dressed and groomed for the day. Her call light was within reach. Observed a nebulizer with medication in the cup sitting on the resident's bed. She stated she did her own nebulizer treatments. She stated the nurse brought in the medication and put it into the cup. Resident #2 stated when she finished eating, she would do her treatment. She finished eating, placed the mask on her face and turned on the machine. The resident's nurse was not in the room. A staff member walked in and asked the resident if she was alright. Resident #2 answered yes. The staff member exited the room. Resident #2 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 22 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow standard and enhanced barrier precautions when performing urinary catheter care and services for one (#3) of three sampled residents Findings included During an observation on 10/24/2024 at 1:45 p.m., Resident #3 was lying in bed. His urinary catheter bag was lying on the floor. Yellow urine was observed in the bag. No ants noted. During observation and interview with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) she entered the room and moved the urinary catheter bag from the floor. She attached it to the bed. She entered the bathroom and washed her hands. During an interview, Staff A stated the resident went to the bathroom by himself and must have left the bag on the floor. She stated the catheter bag needed to be off the floor. She reviewed the Enhanced Barrier sign on the door and stated he was on enhanced precautions due to his catheter. Staff A stated she did not put on gloves nor a gown to move his catheter bag. She stated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interviews and review of records, the facility failed to ensure one (dining room) of two ice makers used for residents was free from bio-growth. Findings included: On 7/8/2024 at 12:30 p.m. and at 3:20 p.m. the main dining room was observed during the lunch meal dining service. The back wall area near the door leading to the kitchen was observed with a walled space containing a counter space, equipment storage area and a large ice maker. Observations revealed staff taking ice from the machine with an ice scoop. Further observations of the machine revealed heavy oxidation, calcification on the outside metal cover. When the ice machine door was opened, it was observed full with ice. Observations on the inner plastic ice chute revealed heavy black discoloration to include bio-growth spotting. It was determined this ice machine was used to serve ice to residents for consumption. On 7/9/2024 at 11:00 a.m., 2:00 p.m., 7/10/2024 at 7:30 a.m., 11:30 a.m., and 1:07 p.m., the dining room ice machine was again observed with black bio-growth in and surrounding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to establish a policy to ensure a safe smoking area where protection from excessive heat and access to hydration was provided to nine of nine ( #13, #108, #30, #106, #165, #98, #19, #317, #166) residents identified as smokers. Findings included: On 7/8/2024 the facility provided a Resident Smoking List which included Resident #13, #108, #30, #106, #165, #98, #19, and #166. Observations of the smoking patio from 7/8/2024 through 7/11/2024 revealed Resident #166 was also a smoker but was not included on the original list provided. Observations on 07/08/24 at 2:28 PM revealed approximately eight residents on the smoking patio. The smoking patio was noted to have no covered area to provide shade for the residents, who were observed to be lined up against the right side of the patio to get relief from the sun from the approximate 12 inches of shade created by the height of the building. Additional observations revealed there was no fluids to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify and report an allegation of physical abuse by a staff member for one (#314) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings Included: A review of the admission Record showed Resident #314 was most recently admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include cerebrovascular Accident (CVA), aphasia, hemiplegia, depression, and legal blindness. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #314 had a Brief Interview Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15, indicating intact cognition. Resident #314 needed maximum assistance with one-person physical assistance with bed mobility, dressing, toilet use, and personal hygiene, and extensive assistance with two plus persons physical assistance with transfers. During an interview on 7/8/2024 at 9:17 AM, Resident #314 reported a concern regarding not being able to get up into a wheelchair. Review of the grievance log, from April 2024 to current, revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to complete an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment that accurately reflected the dental status for one (#21) of 48 sampled residents. Findings Included: Interview with Resident #21 on 07/08/24 at 3:38 PM revealed he has had some toothache pain recently and that the facility puts cream on it. He reported that the cream does not always work and that he has not seen a dentist. On 07/10/24 at 12:40 PM, the resident reported that he has a few teeth left and that one on the bottom has a hole and that one on top was cracked. The resident reported that other than his usual body pain he constantly has mouth pain. The resident reported that he has trouble eating and has to cut everything up small. The resident reported that his dental pain is at a level of 7 to 8 and that all staff give him a cream to rub on his teeth that does not work. The resident reported that the medication he takes for his general pain does not work for his mouth pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interviews, and record review, the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for one (#96) of 48 sampled residents, during four of four days (7/8/2024, 7/9/2024, 7/10/2024, and 7/11/2024). Findings included: Review of Resident #96's care plan revealed: The resident has an activity of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to disease process, impaired balance and limited mobility (date initiated: 10/8/23, date revised: 3/2/24). An intervention for this area included a heel protective boot to bilateral feet while in bed. May remove for ADL care (date initiated: 5/2/2024). The resident has potential for pressure injury development related to immobility (date initiated: 1/25/2024, date revised: 3/2/24). An intervention for this area included follow facility policies/protocols for the prevention/treatment of skin breakdown (date initiated 1/25/2024). The resident has peripheral vascular disease (PVD) related to diabetes and heart disease (date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to provide care according to standards of practice related to an intravenous (IV) line, related to labeling of an IV line and accurate identification of the type of IV line for one resident (#264) out of one resident sampled for IV antibiotics. Findings included: Review of Resident #264's admission Record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital with diagnoses to include urinary tract infection (UTI), artificial openings of urinary tract status, and sepsis due to Escherichia Coli (E. Coli). An interview and observation were conducted on 07/08/24 at 12:45 PM with Resident #264. Resident #264 was observed to be sitting on the side of the bed, clean, dressed in day clothes, without odors. Resident #264 was observed to have an intravenous (IV) pump in his room next to his bed. He said he has an IV in his right upper arm. He held his arm out and there was no date on the IV dressing and blood in the IV line.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-11 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interview the facility failed to provide dental services in a timely manner for 1 of 48 (#21) sampled residents. Findings Included: Review of Resident #21's record revealed this resident was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Ataxia, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and Hyperlipidemia. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13, indicating cognitively intact. Interview with Resident #21 on 07/08/24 at 03:38 PM revealed that he has had some toothache pain recently and that the facility puts cream on it. He reported that the cream does not always work and that he has not seen a dentist. During an interview with Resident #21 on 07/10/24 at 12:40 PM the resident reported that he has a few teeth left and one on the bottom has a hole and one on top was cracked. The resident reported that other than his usual body pain he constantly has mouth pain. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to administer medications in a clean and sanitary manner to prevent the spread of infection related to touching resident medications with bare hands for one resident (#36) out of six residents observed during the medication administration task. Findings included: Review of Resident #36's physician orders revealed an order with a start date of 12/19/2018 and no end date for carbidopa-levodopa 25-100 milligram (mg), give one tablet by mouth five times a day for Parkinson's. A start date of 12/19/2018 and no end date for carbidopa-levodopa 50-200-200 mg give one tablet by mouth at bedtime for Parkinsons. A start date of 12/19/2018 and no end date for amlodipine besylate 5 mg, give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day for hypertension. A start date of 3/7/2019 and no end date for furosemide 20 mg, give one tablet by mouth one time a day every other day for fluid retention. A start date of 6/29/24 and no end date for multivitamin, give one tablet by mouth daily for supplement. A start date of 5/16/24 and no end date for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview the facility failed to provide and honor the resident rights for choice related to health insurance for 3 of 3 (#21, #26, #50) residents reviewed for payer source changes. Findings included: 1. Review of the facility policy titled Resident Rights with an effective date of 11/30/24 revealed it is the policy of the company to provide on-going training on residents rights to staff members as required by state and/or federal regulations. Interview with the Business Office Manager (BOM) on 07/10/24 at 9:23 AM revealed that if a resident was admitted with straight Medicare their stay would be covered 100% for the first 20 days and at Day 21 the resident will have a deductible unless they have a secondary insurance. She reported that straight Medicare and a Medicare HMO (Health Maintenance Organization) are similar but with the HMO, the facility would have to report to a case manager every week. The BOM reported that when approaching the 20-day mark, the resident was encouraged to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-30 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one of three immediate reports reviewed for allegations of neglect was reported within the required 24 hour timeframe. Findings included: A review of a facility's Immediate Report with [report number] showed an incident of neglect. The Immediate Report showed the facility allowed Staff A, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) to work as a Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) on the dates of 07/27/23, 07/28/23, 07/29/23 and 08/01/23 without prior nursing licensure verification. The facility discovered the incident of neglect on 08/09/23. A review of the Nursing Home Reporting- Federal 5 Day Report Manager showed the immediate report [number] was initially submitted by the Administrator on 08/11/23 at 8:29 p.m. During an interview on 10/30/23 at 3:50 p.m., the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) stated report [number] was not reported in the 24-hour timeframe because it was a huge one. The NHA stated normally the required timeframe for reporting an allegation of abuse was within a two hour timeframe and reporting an allegation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-21 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of three (Residents #3, #23, and #244) of four residents sampled for the provision of appropriate incontinent briefs. Findings included: 1. Review of Resident #23's record revealed that this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included Morbid Obesity and had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 2/11/22 with a score of 09 (Moderate Cognitive Impairment). A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the resident required extensive assist of two people for bed mobility, dressing, and toilet use, required extensive assist of one person for personal hygiene and was totally dependent on two staff for bathing. An observations of Resident #23 on 04/19/22 at 10:00 a.m. revealed the resident lying in her bed. During an interview with the resident, she reported the facility never had her size adult disposable briefs, the staff always put small briefs on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-04-21 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — pattern
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide colostomy care consistent with profession standards of practice for one (Resident #449) of two sampled residents with a colostomy. Findings included: An observation was made for Resident #449 on 4/18/22 at 11:29 a.m. The resident was resting in his bed with his head elevated. The resident was a quadriplegic. An indwelling catheter and colostomy bag were observed. A review of the admission record indicated Resident #449 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included unspecified displaced fracture of fifth cervical vertebra, quadriplegia, polyneuropathy, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, colostomy status and neurogenic bowel. A review was conducted of Resident #449's Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services and Patient Transfer Form, dated 4/11/22. The from noted the resident had an ostomy upon transfer. An interview was conducted with Resident #449 on 4/20/22 at 10:04 a.m. The resident stated the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-04-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, staff interview, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure one of one kitchen dish washing machine was running at the required specifications during two of four days observed, (4/18/2022 and 4/19/2022). Findings included: On 4/18/2021 at 9:18 a.m., an initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the facility's Kitchen Manager. The Kitchen Manager revealed they had a dish washing machine and it was a High temp (temperature) machine. However, observations of the front metal cover revealed a bright yellow sticker that revealed, Notice: This machine is currently in chemical sanitizing mode. There was a clear plastic container placed on top of the machine with approximately five to six tubes of chemical sanitizer test strips, and approximately five to six slide out chemical sanitizer test strips. Also, the wall behind the dish machine was observed with a container with a hose leading from it down to the machine. The container was full with a blue/green liquid and the label indicated, [Company name] Rinse Max II, Electronic solid rinse additive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-04-21 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a care plan for one (Resident #450) of one resident in the facility on Transmission Based Precautions (TBP). Findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #450 revealed an admission date of 04/05/2022, with diagnoses that included Malignant neoplasm and Antineoplastic Chemotherapy Induced Pancytopenia. Review of the Physician's Orders showed an order for Reverse Isolation related to malignant Neoplasm of unspecified site of left female breast, dated 04/08/2022. The care plan for Resident #450 was reviewed and did not include a focus, goals, or interventions related to Transmission Based Precautions. On 04/19/2022 at 10:01 a.m., an interview was conducted with Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN). The LPN confirmed the resident was on TBP, stating, it is 'reverse isolation' as she is neutropenic. An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 04/21/2022 at 9:11 a.m The DON confirmed it was his expectation the TBP, along with goals and interventions, would be on the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY The facility failed to reassess care plan problem areas and interventions for one (Resident #10) of forty sampled residents related to accuracy of care plans. Findings included: On 4/18/2022 at 10:00 a.m., and 1:23 p.m. Resident #10 was observed in his room and lying in bed at its lowest position and with the call light placed within his reach. Resident #10 was not able to communicate or be interviewed with relation to his care and services. Further observations revealed he had arm and leg contractures. Both elbows and both knees were observed without any type of splints or braces. On 4/19/2022 at 7:45 a.m., 10:00 a.m., 12:45 p.m., 1:25 p.m., and 2:20 p.m., Resident #10 was observed lying in bed with the call light placed within his reach. He was noted with his eyes closed and not presenting with any behaviors, pain or discomfort. Resident #10 was observed with both of his elbows and both of his knees without any type of braces or splints. On 4/20/2022 at 7:50 a.m., 8:40 a.m., and 12:45 p.m., Resident #10 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure wound care was completed and documented according to Physician's Orders and professional standards on three (04/14/2022, 04/15/2022 and 04/16/2022) of thirteen days reviewed, and for one (Resident #494) of thirteen residents with pressure wounds. Findings included: Review of the clinical record for Resident #494 showed an admission date of 04/08/2022, with diagnoses that included Necrotizing Fasciitis, Osteomyelitis and Pressure Ulcers. Continued review of the record revealed the following pressure wounds: -Unstageable Deep Tissue Injury (DTI) to Left Heel - 3 centimeters (cm) x 3.5cm x unable to determine depth (utd) -Unstageable DTI to Right posterior heel - 4.2cm x 1.8cm x utd -Unstageable DTI to Right posterior Calf - 5.1cm x 1.6cm x utd -Stage 4 to Sacrum - 15cm x 13.8cm x 0.5cm -Unstageable Pressure Ulcer due to necrosis on Right buttock - 6cm x 4.6cm x utd Review of the Physician's Orders revealed: -Apply betadine to left heel wound daily and leave open to air, dated 04/11/2022 -Apply betadine to right…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility did not follow the Registered Dietician's recommendations and maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status for one (Resident #45) of forty sampled residents. Findings Included: An observation and interview were conducted for Resident #45 on 4/18/22 at 12:00 p.m. Resident #45 was lying in bed with her roommate sitting at her bedside. The resident appeared small and frail. She stated her biggest concern was the food, she did not like it. A review of the admission records indicated Resident #45 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus type II, major depressive disorder, peripheral vascular disease, gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD,) and dysphagia. A review of Resident #45's care plans indicated care plans in place for activities of daily living (ADL) self-care performance deficit, peripheral vascular disease (PVD,) and risk for a potential nutrition problem or malnutrition. The care plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-04-21 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring was in place for one (Resident #444) of five sampled residents on psychotropic medications. Findings included: A review of admission records indicated Resident #444 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including acute pain due to trauma, major depressive disorder, and schizophrenia. A review of orders revealed the following: Donepezil HCL Tablet 10 milligrams (mg). Give 10mg by mouth at bedtime for Alzheimer related Alzheimer's disease. Start date: 4/9/22 Quetiapine Fumarate Tablet 25mg. Give 25mg by mouth one times a day related to schizophrenia. Start date: 4/12/22 Escitalopram Oxalate tablet 5mg. Give 5mg by mouth one time a day for depression. Start date: 4/9/22 Quetiapine Fumarate Tablet 50mg. Give 50mg by mouth at bedtime related to schizophrenia. Start date: 4/9/22 Trazodone HCL Tablet 50mg. Give 50mg by mouth one time a day for depression/insomnia. Start date: 4/9/22 Sertraline HCL tablet 50mg. Give 50mg by mouth…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2021-02-26 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and maintenance record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment on two (East and West) of two units, as evidenced by damage and holes in the walls of resident rooms, common area handrails with missing end bumpers exposing internal components and frayed plastic wall bumpers with sharp edges exposed, an unsanitary shower room with floor and wall tiles missing, and a broken bed footboard exposing unsanitary and unsafe composite rough edges. The findings included: On 02/24/21 at 9:57 a.m., an observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed a hole in the wall behind the headboard of the bed. The occupying resident stated the hole had been there for as long as she had been its occupant for the last several weeks. On 2/24/21 at 11:04 a.m., an observation in room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed damage to the walls behind the beds and nightstands. The bathroom wall was observed to have a large area of damage. Photographic evidence was obtained.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-02-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement care plan interventions for one (Resident #49) of two residents sampled for accidents related to ensuring floor mats were in place for a high fall risk resident. Findings included: A review of Resident #49's admission Record revealed an admission date of 01/06/21 with medical diagnoses of dysphagia, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, major depressive disorder, and malignant neoplasm of the bladder and nasopharynx. His Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated 1/13/21, Section C: Cognitive Patterns revealed the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 02, indicating impaired cognition. Under Section G: Functional Status it was revealed Resident #49 required extensive assistance with two people for bed mobility and personal hygiene and was total dependence for transfers. A review of Resident #49's Fall Risk Eval [Evaluation] ., dated 01/06/21, revealed a score of 95, indicating the Resident was at high risk for falling due to overestimating/forgetting limitations, having an impaired gait, and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2021-02-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide indwelling catheter care related to creating physician orders, creating an individualized care plan with interventions, and monitoring and reporting signs and symptoms of infection for one (Resident #67) of five residents with an indwelling catheter. Findings included: A review of Resident #67's admission Record revealed an admission date of 01/26/2021 with medical diagnoses of unstageable pressure ulcers to the left and right heel, acute kidney failure, adult failure to thrive, and stiff-man syndrome. A review of Resident #67's Medical Certification for Medicaid Long-Term Care Service and Patient Transfer Form (3008) form, dated 1/26/21, revealed in Section P: Patient Health Status that the Resident has urinary retention related to a neurogenic bladder and requires a catheter. Under Section S: Physical Function it is indicated that the Resident is not ambulatory with no weight bearing abilities on either the left or right side. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), Section C: Cognition Patterns,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$57,962 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

  • $32,200 — penalty dated 2024-10-24
  • $25,762 — penalty dated 2024-07-11

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspire At EvansFort Myers, FL 1 of 5Aviata At BenevaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Big BendPerry, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Bryan DairyLargo, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Palma Sola BayBradenton, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Saint LucieFort Pierce, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SarasotaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SeminoleSeminole, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The BayTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The PalmsPalm Harbor, FL 1 of 5Aviata At VeniceVenice, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Arbor SpringsOcala, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BradentonBradenton, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BrentwoodLecanto, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Colonial LakesWinter Garden, FL 2 of 5Aviata At EnglewoodEnglewood, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Grand OaksPalm Coast, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Green Cove SpringsGreen Cove Springs, FL 2 of 5Aviata At GreenacresGreen Acres, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Lakeside OaksDunedin, FL 2 of 5Aviata At OakfieldBrandon, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Santa BarbaraCape Coral, FL 2 of 5Aviata At South DaytonaSouth Daytona, FL 2 of 5Aviata At TallahasseeTallahassee, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The HarborSafety Harbor, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - PasadenaSouth Pasadena, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Pompano BeachPompano Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata At West Palm BeachWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata at Sand KeyClearwater, FL 3 of 5Aspire At Ridge HavenNew Port Richey, FL 3 of 5Aviata At BrooksvilleBrooksville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Central ParkBrandon, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Coral BayWest Palm Beach, FL 3 of 5Aviata At CountrysidePalm Harbor, FL 3 of 5Aviata At JacksonvilleJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At North Fort MyersN Ft Myers, FL 3 of 5Aviata At RosewoodOrlando, FL 3 of 5Aviata At San JoseJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At St CloudSaint Cloud, FL 3 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Harbor BeachFort Lauderdale, FL

Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
WEST FLETCHER PARENT LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2023
TAMPA HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2023
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023
BURNS, SHELVAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/06/2025
RABAGO-REYES, CASSANDRAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/28/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2025
HERSKOWITZ, ELIEZERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
HERSKOWITZ, YAAKOVIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/16/2025
ASPIRE MGT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+0.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$94K
Related-party expense2% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 66%Medicare 7%Other / private 27%

This home reported $94K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$323per resident / day
operating cost
$9,832per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$323per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105644. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-07-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next