Aviata At Green Cove Springs

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

38.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 28 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 63.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 41 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 111.6 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.42 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.19 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.17 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.52 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.43 to 0.21 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2023-03-30 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, a review of resident records, and the facility's policy and procedure titled G-Tube Care, the facility failed to 1) Follow treatment ordered by the physician for G-tube (G-tube; a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach to provide liquid nutrition, medications and fluids) dressing changes, 2) Arrange G-tube removal in a timely manner, and 3) Prevent complications of the G-tube, specifically, recurrent stoma infections for one (Resident #80) of three residents reviewed with G-Tubes, from a total of 36 residents in the sample. The findings include: A review of Resident #80's medical record found he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a planned discharge to an acute-care hospital on [DATE] and a readmission on [DATE]. His diagnoses included type 2 diabetes mellitus, major depressive disorder, gastrostomy status (status post-surgical procedure creating an opening in the stomach for the introduction of food through a feeding…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on kitchen food service observations, staff interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness with the potential to affect all residents who consumed foods from the facility's kitchen, by failing to clean the juice dispenser hose attachment connected to the thickened water bag in box and the 100% apple blend juice (regular consistency) on the juice machine. Food handling and sanitation are important in health care settings serving nursing home residents. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure. The findings include: A follow-up tour of the kitchen was conducted on 02/12/25 at 11:21 AM. During the tour, the juice dispenser attachment connected to the thickened water bag in box and the 100% apple blend juice (regular consistency) was observed with brownish-orange substances around the hose attachment area connected to thickened water bag and the 100% apple blend juice (regular consistency). Two juice…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-02-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility record review, staff interview, and a review of facility policy and procedure, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive water management program for the purpose of reducing the risk of growth and spread of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in the facility's water system. Residents of nursing homes who may suffer from a weakened immune system, chronic lung disease, or other underlying medical conditions such as immunosuppression, are especially at risk for Legionnaires' Disease (type of pneumonia) if exposed to Legionella bacteria. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. Facilities must be able to demonstrate their measures to minimize the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens in building water systems such as by having a documented water management program that must be based on nationally accepted standards. The program must include an assessment to identify where Legionella and other opportunistic waterborne pathogens could grow and spread; measures to prevent the growth of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-13 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and a review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #84) of four residents reviewed for accident hazards, from a total survey sample of 36 residents, had an environment as free of accident hazards as possible. Hydrogen peroxide, isopropyl alcohol, and disinfectant spray were found on Resident #84's chest of drawers. The findings include: On 02/10/25 at 12:32 PM, Resident #84's room was observed. An aerosol can of disinfectant spray, a bottle of hydrogen peroxide (mild antiseptic), and isopropyl alcohol were observed sitting on top of the resident's chest of drawers adjacent to his bed. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 02/10/25 at 2:56 PM, Resident #84's room was observed. An aerosol can of disinfectant spray, a bottle of hydrogen peroxide (mild antiseptic), and isopropyl alcohol were observed sitting on top of the resident's chest of drawers adjacent to his bed. (Photographic evidence obtained) A review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-30 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
  Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours on February, 27, 2023. Nurse staffing in nursing homes has a substantial impact on the quality of care and outcomes that residents experience. Failure to staff a registered nurse for at least 8 hours a day could result in a negative impact on resident care. The findings include: A review of the Payroll Based Journal Staffing Data Report for the period covering July 1, 2022 through September 30, 2022, rvealed that the facility's submitted weekend staffing data was excessively low. A review of the facility's staffing calculations from February 5, 2023 through March 25, 2023, revealed there was no RN on duty at all on February 27, 2023, a Monday. (Copies obtained). An interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing on 3/29/23 at 1:40 PM. She stated the facility only employed two registered nurses currently, herself and the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator. The facility relied on Staffing Agencies for RNs. She confirmed that at times, she had…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-03-30 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespread
  Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews with staff, the facility failed to dispose of garbage and refuse properly and in a manner to prevent invitation, harboring and feeding of pests which can carry infectious diseases. This had the potential to affect all 103 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey by risking exposure to vermin and disease. The findings include: An initial tour of the kitchen was conducted with the Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) on 03/27/23 at 9:37 AM. The tour concluded with the inspection of the three garbage dumpsters which were situated on the southwest side of the facility. The chain link cage that enclosed the dumpsters was ajar and one of the dumpsters had one of two lids open. The area surrounding the dumpsters was littered with copious amounts of trash including food containers, used gloves, cardboard and other trash. The wooden privacy fence behind the dumpsters had a panel that had fallen into the wooded area and the waste extended into the woods. An interview with the CDM at this time found all departments use and were responsible…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, the facility failed to provide sufficient storage to accommodate personal belongings for one (Resident #756) of two residents reviewed for accommodation of needs from a total of 36 residents in the sample. The findings include: An observation of Resident #756's room was made on 03/27/23 at 10:55 AM. She occupied the bed on the window-side of the double-occupancy room. Personal belongings were stored on the floor along the baseboards on all three sides of the room on Resident #756's side. Belongings included two insulated drinking cups, four bags of personal belongings, a small plastic bin containing hygiene supplies, an electric keyboard with items piled on top, a large cardboard box with approximately two feet of clothing piled on top, and a suitcase with boxes and clothing resting on it. Almost every linear foot of the baseboard around her side of the room was lined with personal belongings. She had a small dresser, nightstand and a wardrobe but there was still enough space for additional storage bins or a second…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, and a review of resident records, the facility failed to review and revise the plan of care to reflect the discontinuation of a gastrostomy tube (G-tube; a tube inserted through the wall of the abdomen directly into the stomach to provide liquid nutrition, medications and fluids) after the resident resumed food and medications by mouth for one (Resident #46) of three residents reviewed for g-tubes from a total of 36 residents in the sample. The findings include: An interview was conducted with Resident #46 on 03/29/23 at 10:10 AM. He was speaking very loudly and threatened that he was about to rip his g-tube out. Resident #46 lifted his shirt to show the insertion site and the tube. He reported he was eating by mouth and insisted the tube was supposed to have been removed. A record review for Resident #46 found he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had a 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date of 2/8/23, that noted he…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-30 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, resident and staff interviews, a review of resident records, and the facility's policy and procedure for Care of Nails, the facility failed to provide appropriate grooming, personal hygiene and oral care to three (Residents #88, #94 and #20) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs), from a total of 36 residents in the sample. The findings include: 1. An observation of Resident #88 was made on 3/27/23 at 11:03 AM. He was in his bed and his feet were protruding from under the bedding. His toenails were long, jagged and thickened. The nails on both great toes were approximately an inch long and at least one of the nails on his smaller toes was beginning to curl under. Resident #88 confirmed his nails needed care. He said he was supposed to be on the list for the podiatrist. An observation on 3/28/23 at 9:41 AM, found Resident #88 in bed with his feet protruding from under the blanket. His toenails were in the same condition as the previous day's observation. He still…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews with staff, and a review of the facility's policy and procedure for Medication Management for Psychotropic Medications, the facility failed to ensure behavior monitoring was conducted for one (Resident #83) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use, from a total of 36 residents in the sample. The findings include: On 3/28/23 at 12:30 p.m., Resident #83 was observed eating lunch in the day room. She had bruising noted under both her left and right eyes. She reported she fell and hit something, but she was not sure what that was. The resident had some confusion and was unable to remain focused during the interview. A record review was conducted for Resident #83, which noted an admission date of 6/9/22 with a readmission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included schizo-affective disorder with a physician's order for Haldol (antipsychotic medication) 10 mg (milligrams) BID (twice daily), ordered on 3/6/23. There was also a 2/23/23 order for Lorazepam…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-03-30 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
  Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, interviews with staff, and a review of the facility's policy and procedure for Medication Management for Psychotropic Medications, the facility failed to ensure psychotropic medications ordered as needed included a stop date for one (Resident #83) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medication use, from a total of 36 residents in the sample. Resident #83 was receiving Lorazepam (benzodiazepine sometimes used for agitation) as needed for aggression with no stop date noted or rationale for continuing the medication beyond 14 days. The findings include: On 3/28/23 at 12:30 PM, Resident #83 was observed eating lunch in the day room. She had bruising noted under both her left and right eyes. She reported she fell and hit something, but she was not sure what that was. The resident had some confusion and was unable to remain focused during the interview. A record review was conducted for Resident #83, which noted an admission date of 6/9/22 with a readmission on [DATE]. Her…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 16 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 75% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $70K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL