No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aviata At Seminole

9393 Park Blvd, Seminole, FL 33777 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (727) 391-2200 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (727) 391-2200 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)$35,944 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (37) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $35,944 in federal fines (most recent 2024-01-08)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
8900 Park Blvd · (727) 545-4545 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
9117 Park Blvd N · (727) 592-4588 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
8815 N Pk Blvd · (727) 393-4879 · Call to confirm hours
Park
7480 Starkey Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.8%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.5%5.5%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.7%0.3%0.9%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.6%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.2%2.5%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.1%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication23.3%14.4%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.1%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.6%10.5%21.2%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.9%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.8%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine93.9%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.8%26.1%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.6%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.052.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.781.151.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.5%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.12hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 53 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.9%CMS range 6.4–16.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.5%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge58.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge50.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.071.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.80
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.11
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.37
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.33
RN hoursweekends
71.2%
Total nursing turnover
66.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 107.5 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-05-23)
7
at the previous standard inspection (2022-01-14)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

37 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 27 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · F2025-12-16 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — widespread
    Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility did not ensure four residents (#1, #3, #6, #10) out of five residents reviewed were informed in advance of changes to their plan of care related to medication.Findings included: An interview was conducted on 12/15/25 at 10:45 a.m. with Resident #1. The resident said she was very upset because the facility changed her medications and did not discuss it with her or even let her know. Resident #1 said she had been on Clonazepam for a long time and was taken off. The resident said she was not aware she had been taken off the medication until she started feeling different and spoke to the nurse. She said her nurse informed her she was no longer taking Clonazepam and something else. Resident #1 said she had heard of this happening to several other residents in the facility as well. Review of admission Records showed Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including major depressive disorder, suicidal ideations, generalized anxiety disorder, chronic pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-16 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to provide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) practice that demonstrated identification, monitoring and implementation of an effective Action Plan to improve findings of deficient practice on the recertification survey conducted on 12/15/2025-12/16/2025 regarding maintaining a clean, sanitary and safe physical environment.Findings included: The facility plan of correction completion date was 11/07/2025. The plan of correction for F584 showed, Closet, wall and floors in identified rooms were cleaned on 10/7/2025. Facility wide audit completed with no other rooms identified. 100% education for housekeeping staff on 5 and 7 step cleaning and 100% Department Heads/IDT (Interdisciplinary team) on identification and appropriate notification of dark spots, discoloration and bio-growth. Audits will be done 4 x weekly for 1 month then then weekly Biweekly for 4 weeks and 1xmonthly ongoing. Audits will be brought to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews the facility did not ensure proper infection control practices on five halls (100, 200, 400, 500, 600) out of six halls in the facility related to contact precautions, personal protective equipment (PPE) use, clean linen storage, and improper storage of oxygen equipment.Findings included: Review of a list of residents on Trasmission Based Precautions provided by the facility showed residents in room [ROOM NUMBER], 108, and 511 were on contact precautions. During a tour of the facility on 12/15/25 from 9:45-10:15 a.m. the following observations were made:-room [ROOM NUMBER] had a nebulizer mask uncovered on the bedside table. No bag for mask storage was observed.-An open, unlabeled water bottle sitting on the railing in the 200 hall with a used washcloth underneath.-room [ROOM NUMBER] had an oxygen mask on the bedside table uncovered. No bag for mask storage was observed.-room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have a partially obscured contact precaution sign on the door and a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to obtain a blood pressure prior to the administration of an antihypertensive with physician ordered parameters for one resident (#16) of two residents sampled during medication administration. Findings included: On 11/17/25 at 9:17 a.m. Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN) was observed standing at a medication cart on the 200-hall. Staff A reported finishing up (med administration) with one resident but did have others. The process of medication administration was explained to Staff A. Staff A dispensed the following medications for Resident #16:-Senna Plus 8.6-50 milligram (mg) over the counter (otc) tablet-Amlodipine 5 mg tablet-Aspirin Enteric coated otc 81 mg tablet-Vitamin D 25 microgram (mcg) otc tablet-Pancrelipase Creon Delayed Release (DR) 24000 unit tablet- Dicyclomine 20 mg tablet-Duloxetine 30 mg caplet-Oxycodone 10 mg tabletStaff A dropped the Oxycodone tablet onto the top of medication cart, picking it up with bare hands, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to notify and consult with the resident's physician on their known use of illicit drugs, related to the potential for medication contraindication for one resident (#4) out of eight residents sampled. Findings Included: On 10/07/2025 at 10:58 A.M. Resident #4 was observed in his wheelchair in the parking lot smoking. He said he goes to the west side of the parking lot for more privacy. He had a bottle of cologne on his lap and started spraying it on his body. Resident #4 said he was smoking marijuana (a psychoactive drug derived from the dried leaves, flowers, and stems of the Cannabis sativa or Cannabis indica plants, with effects Relaxation, Euphoria, Increased appetite, Altered perception, Impaired coordination, and Anxiety (in some users). Source:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabis. Resident #4 said some staff cared that he smoked and some staff did not. On 10/07/2025 at 2:00 pm. Resident #4 was observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] sitting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-10-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and sanitary environment, in one common room and in two resident rooms (407 and 108) located in two halls (400 and 100) of six halls observed. Findings included: An observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 10/7/2025 at 9:24 A.M. revealed multiple light, dark gray and black spots of biogrowth on the back wall of the closet. The corners of the closet and the floor revealed dark accumulation of microorganisms. The floors were stained with brown and black substances. An observation of the Day Room revealed two air vents on the ceiling. There was white paint around each vent and underneath the paint was black areas observed coming through the peeling paint. The paint was covering areas of moisture/condensation. An interview was conducted on 10/7/2025 at 11:50 A.M. with Staff A, Housekeeping. Staff A said each room in the facility was deep cleaned at least once per month. She said if she saw bio-growth, she would spray it…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-06-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews the facility failed to protect residents from neglect and verbal abuse by two staff members (A & B) for eight residents (#1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #8, and #9) out of eight sampled for abuse and neglect. Findings included: On 6/9/25 at 10:00 a.m. Resident #1 was observed lying in bed and covered with blankets. The resident reported abusive and neglectful behavior had occurred last week, had been on menstrual cycle, and was left saturated with blood all day. The resident stated having had problems several times with Staff A Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and Staff B CNA being disrespectful, calling names, had talked about this resident's children, and talked about other residents and staff all the time. Resident #1 stated the staff members spoke about how fat they (other residents) were and how difficult it was to roll them. The resident stated the staff members behavior had been reported before, did not remember when, and did not know what the facility…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a functioning grievance process for two residents (#1 and #9 ) of ten residents sampled. Findings included: A review of a Complaint / Grievance Report, dated 05/22/2025, documented (Resident #1) communicated verbally to the Social Service Assistant (SSA) a concern: Resident #1 stated 2 CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistants) were having personal conversations when providing care. The form was signed by the Social Services Director (SSD) on 05/23/2025. The form had an area to document the concern type, treatment, Care, management of funds, behavior of other residents, missing items, violation of rights, and other. The latter area was blank. The form documented nursing was assigned the responsibility for the investigation. The findings of the investigation were documented: Staff were identified and were noted to have personal conversations while providing care to residents. The plan to resolve the complaint: Education to identified CNAs.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-09 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of neglect was reported to the appropriate Agencies for one (#9) of ten sampled residents. Findings included: A review of Resident #9's clinical chart documented an admission of 05/2023. His diagnosis list included but not limited to Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with Diabetic Polyneuropathy, Morbid obesity, and muscle weakness. A review of a Brief Interview for Mental status, dated 08/16/2024, documented a score of 13, with a comment Intact cognitive response. A review of Resident #9's clinical chart, the Care Plan, documented a focus area: Resident #9 has an ADL (Activity of Daily Living) self-care performance deficit and at risk for decline. Interventions included: Toilet Use: The resident is totally dependent on staff for toileting . incontinent to bowel, initiated 04/04/2023. A review of Staff B, Certified Nursing Assistant's (CNA) personnel file was conducted with the Human Resource Director (HRD). Present in the file was a document, Teachable Moment, dated 05/29/2025 for Staff B, CNA,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were assesed to need constatnt supervision during smoking received adequate supervision for nine (#10, #13, #8, #12, #14, #9, #11, #15 and #26) of 27 sampled residents. Findings included: Review of the Smoking Agreement/Notice of Policy showed smoking is allowed by the center to accommodate those who wish to smoke. However, for the safety of all residents and staff the center has promulgated a safe smoking policy. All residents who wish to smoke at the center will abide by the center's smoking policy. Residents electing to smoke will be provided a safe smoking assessment to determine and evaluate each resident's ability to safely smoke. Because violations of the smoking policy can lead to catastrophic consequences, the smoking policy will be vigorously applied without exception. Violations of the policy will result in remedial action based upon the nature of the infraction. Remedial includes but is not limited to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 27 citations
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and facility record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing met the needs of the residents as evidenced by: 1. Resident interviews on untimely call light response for five residents (#5, #23, #24, #25 and #26) of six residents sampled, 2. Unresolved grievances related to call light response times for one resident (#5) of two residents reviewed for grievances. Findings Included: An interview was conducted on 04/02/2025 at 9:45 a.m. with Resident #23 and #24. Resident #24 stated that the staffing was often a problem. She stated staff often said they were Short-handed and didn't have time to assist her or she had to wait longer for assistance. Resident #24 stated she was often provided with incontinence care only one time during the first shift of the day. Resident #23 confirmed that she had brought up her concerns. He stated that he's an independent resident but had observed they took a long time to assist Resident #24. Record review revealed that Resident #23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to have a system in place to enable accurate reconciliation and accounting for all controlled medications for 4 out of 6 sampled medication carts. Findings included: An observation was conducted on 04/02/2025 at 10:20 a.m. with Staff L, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for the 500 hallway medication cart. Staff L, LPN was observed placing one Medication Monitoring / Control Records log into the 500 hallway narcotic book. The Shift Change Controlled Substance Inventory Count Sheet showed there were 25 cards and 1 bottle of liquid in the narcotic drawer. Staff L counted the cards as well as the bottle of liquid controlled substance, and they matched the Shift Change Controlled Substance Inventory Count Sheet. The individual controlled drugs/cards were compared to the individual Medication Monitoring / Control Records log and they matched. The Shift Change Controlled Substance Inventory Count Sheet for the 500 hallway showed the following residents on 04/02/2025 had narcotics added to the medication cart, without a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to establish and implement a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) that enabled accurate reconciliation and accounting for all controlled medications for 4 out of 6 sampled medication carts. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy, QAPI Goals, 2025 QAPI Plan, not dated, showed the following: At Aspire at Seminole we are committed to focusing on clinical care, quality of life and resident choice. On behalf of those we serve, we are committed to using QAPI to improve our performance and practices and to assure wee meet and exceed regulatory requirements and standards. Scope: Aspire at Seminole's QAPI program encompasses all areas that impact quality of care, quality of life, resident choice and care transition with participation from all disciplines. Patient-Driven Care: all patient care is patient-driven to ensure that residents are properly cared for and are a part of their care planning and drive their outcomes. Performance Improvement Projects (PIPs): The QAPI team will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-04-03 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — pattern
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to abide by their smoking policy of ensuring residents are provided a safe, designated smoking area for nine (#10, #13, #8, #12, #14, #9, #11, #15 and #26) of 27 sampled residents. Findings included: Review of the facility's policy, Smoking-Supervised, revised 02/07/2020 showed the Center will provide a safe, designated smoking area for residents. For the safety of all residents the designated smoking area will be monitored by a staff member during authorized smoking times. Smoking is only allowed in designated areas and during designated times. The Center will have safety equipment available in designated smoking areas including: smoking aprons, a fire extinguisher and non-combustible self-closing ashtrays. Procedure: 1. Residents that wish to smoke will be evaluated on admission/re-admission, quarterly, and with a change in condition to determine if assistance or supervision is required for smoking. 2. If a resident is identified during the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a transfer notice was provided to the resident and the resident representative for one (Resident #3) of three residents sampled for emergency transfers. Findings included: Review of Resident #3's admission Record showed he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently readmitted on [DATE]. Review of paperwork dated 02/02/2025 at 2:38 PM showed the Psychiatric Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner (ARNP) completed involuntary examination documents for Resident #3 for schizoaffective disorder, resident's inability to determine whether examination is necessary, and a substantial likelihood that without care or treatment the individual will cause serious bodily harm to self or others. The ARNP documented the patient presented with psychosis, significant agitation, aggression and threatening of staff. Resident threw his food tray at a staff member and smeared feces all over his room. Resident was refusing all care or any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an injury of unknown origin that resulted in a transfer to a higher level of care for one (#1) of one resident out of ten residents reviewed. Findings Included: A review of Resident #1's admission Record showed an original admit date of [DATE] with a readmission date of [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage affecting right dominant side Other abnormal of gait and mobility Need for assistance with personal care Difficulty in walking, not elsewhere classified. Muscle weakness (generalized) Muscle wasting and atrophy, not elsewhere classified, unspecified site A review of Resident #1's care plan dated [DATE] showed a Focus area: ADL (Activity of Daily Living)/ self-care performance deficit related to hemiparesis, weakness, dementia, schizoaffective disorder- depressive type, major depressive disorder, insomnia, incontinence, muscle wasting and atrophy, lumbar spondylosis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to 1. provide treatment and services in accordance with physician orders for one (#9) out of three residents reviewed; and 2. failed to ensure call lights were answered within a timely manner for four (#5, #6, #7, and #8) of ten sampled residents. Findings Included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include acute osteomyelitis, chronic ulcer of the right heel and midfoot, peripheral vascular disease, and type 2 diabetes mellitus with foot ulcer. Review of Resident #9's Medication Administration Record for November 2024 showed the following: -Cleanse left Achilles with [antimicrobial wound cleanser] 0.125% solution, apply nickel thick [topical enzyme medication] and cover with dry dressing every day shift for arterial wound, completion of wound care was not documented on 11/3, 11/4, 11/5, 11/6, and 11/9/2024. -Cleanse left anterior lower leg with [antimicrobial…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure adequate nail care and consistent shower services for one (Resident #1) of three residents sampled for Activity of Daily Living services. Findings included: A review of Resident #1's clinical chart, documented an initial admission of 05/2022; readmission of 03/2024. Medical Diagnoses included: Metabolic Encephalopathy; Hyperosmolality and Hyponatremia; Aphasia; chronic kidney disease; contracture of muscle right hand, diabetes insipidus . On 09/16/2024 at 1:08 p.m., a phone interview was conducted with Resident #1's family member. She stated she communicated with (Resident #1) daily by way of video chat. She stated his appearance was unclean at times and his fingernails are long and unclean. On 09/16/2024 at approximately 1:30 p.m., Resident #1 was observed in his room, sitting in his wheelchair at bedside. He agreed to answer questions. He showed the surveyor his hands. Resident #1 was observed to have a closed right hand, which he pulled open to show his nails. The skin on the right hand was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure a dignified existence was provided to one resident (#16) out of eight residents sampled. Findings included: During an observation made on 05/20/2024 at 2:51 p.m. Resident #16 was observed scooting around on the floor in her room with staff surrounding her. The resident scooted from her room into the middle of the hallway in front of other residents and staff. During an observation made on 05/22/2024 at 10:30 a.m., in the activities room, Resident #16 was observed in a corner separated from other residents in the activities room while an activities program was being conducted with other residents. She was observed sleeping with a blanket over her whole body, reclined back in the chair's lowest position and her feet positioned upward. Review of an admission Record, dated 05/23/2024, showed Resident #16 was admitted originally on 05/18/2022 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include senile degeneration of brain, not elsewhere…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure a reasonable accommodation of resident needs for one resident (#44) out of eight sampled residents related to having an appropriate bed to sleep in. Finding included: During an observation made on 5/20/2024 at 12:00 pm. Resident #44 was observed lying down in bed with his feet hanging off the edge of the bed mattress. He was observed dressed in his night gown. He said his legs were too long for his bed and the staff at the facility had known about it for a long time, but had not done anything about it. During an observation on 5/22/2024 at 8:00 a.m. Resident #44 was observed lying down in bed with his head slightly elevated and his feet hanging off the edge of his bed. He said he would like to have another bed because he was not able to fit on his bed. Review of an admission Record, dated 5/22/2024, showed Resident #44 was originally admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses to include but not limited to difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0645 — isolated
    PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR), the facility failed to ensure residents received an accurate Level I Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) for four residents (#6, #68, #36 and #43) of twenty-three sampled residents who were reviewed for PASRR screens. Findings included: 1. Review of the admission Record showed Resident #43 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but not limited to undifferentiated schizophrenia, unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance and anxiety, and major depressive disorder, recurrent. Review of the Aging Solution Form, dated 04/15/24, showed under the Diagnosis and Active Diagnoses section Resident #43 had a Primary Diagnosis Dementia; Secondary Diagnosis Traumatic Brain Injury. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed in Section C - Cognitive Patterns a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan to meet the resident's communication needs for one (Resident #491) of one sampled resident and for one (Resident #87) of one resident sampled for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) status. Findings included: 1. On [DATE] at 1:17 p.m. Resident #491 was observed in her room laying down in bed. Resident #491's [family member], the resident's responsible party, was speaking in Spanish with her roommate, Resident #491's [family member] stated the resident did not speak English and asked for the interview to be conducted in Spanish. Both Resident #491's [family member] and her roommate stated the roommate would help communicate with staff, in Spanish, in the [family member's] absence. Resident #491's [family member] stated the nurse on shift during the day spoke Spanish. At 1:24 p.m. Staff F, Registered Nurse (RN) entered the room and asked the resident, in Spanish, if she was having any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to review and revise the care plan for one resident (#87) out of the sampled thirty-nine residents. Findings included: On 05/20/24 at 11:28 a.m. Resident #87's room door was observed with signage that showed enhanced barrier precautions. A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #87 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include candidiasis and pneumonia. Section I - Active Diagnoses of the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed Resident #87 had an active diagnosis of pneumonia. The care plan with a focus area that showed Resident #87 had candida auris was initiated on 04/02/24. Interventions included but were not limited to contact isolation. The care plan with a focus area that showed Resident #87 was on antibiotic therapy related to sepsis and pneumonia was initiated on 04/23/24. Interventions included but were not limited to administer antibiotic medications as ordered by physician. A review of the Order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the proper and timely interventions to prevent pressure ulcers for one (Resident #290) out of three sampled residents. Findings include: On 5/20/24 at 9:30 a.m., an interview was conducted with the family of Resident #290. Resident #290's family member stated the resident had a pressure sore on her bottom and left ankle, stating, we aren't too surprised because she has been in a regular bed since she has been here. Resident #290 was sitting in bed slightly less than ninety degrees upright while her family member attempted to assist with a high protein yogurt brought from the family member's home. The family member stated, I know a diet high in protein will help heal her wounds. Resident #290 had both her legs drawn in close to her buttocks and incapable of naturally straightening her legs. A review of Resident #290's admission Record showed an admission date of 5/03/2024 with a primary diagnosis of urinary tract infection.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure one (Resident #87) out of the sampled seven residents, who was fed by enteral means, received appropriate treatment and services per physician orders. Findings included: On 05/22/24 at 10:23 a.m., Resident #87 was observed in bed sleeping. The enteral feeding pump was observed at 65 ml per hour and the total fed was 12,217 milliliters (ml). A review of the admission Record revealed Resident #87 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include dysphagia and pneumonia. Section C- Cognitive Patterns of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) showed Resident #87 was rarely/never understood. Section I- Active Diagnoses of the MDS showed Resident #87 had a diagnosis of dysphagia, oropharyngeal phase. Section K- Swallowing/ Nutritional Status showed the resident had a nutritional approach of feeding tube. A review of the Order Listing Report with a date range of 03/01/24-05/31/24 revealed the following active orders: Enteral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-23 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and review of the facility's policy Medication Management-Psychotropic Medications, the facility failed to ensure side effects monitoring was in place for one (Resident #8) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary and psychotropic medication regimen review. Findings included: Review of the admission Record revealed Resident #8 was initially admitted to the facility 05/15/23 with diagnoses that included but not limited to Schizoaffective Disorder, Bipolar type, Parkinson's Disease without dyskinesia, Major depressive disorder, recurrent and anxiety disorder, unspecified. A review of the Order Summary Report showed the following psychotropic medication ordered: - A physician order dated 05/11/24 showed, Xtapaza ER Oral Capsule ER 12-hour abuse- deterrent 9 MG- Give 1 capsule by mouth two times a day for chronic pain. - A physician order dated 05/07/24 showed, Duloxetine HCI Oral capsule Delayed Release Particles 60 MG- Give 1 capsule by mouth for Major Depressive Disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5.00%. Twenty-six medication administration opportunities were observed and three errors were identified for three residents (Residents #79, #22 and #6) of six residents observed. These errors constituted a 11.54% medication error rate. Findings Include: On 5/22/24 at 9:29 a.m., an observation was conducted during medication administration with Staff C, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) for Resident #79. Staff C dispensed the following medication: -Aspirin 81 milligrams (mg) chewable one tablet -Carvedilol 3.125 mg one tablet -Plavix 75 mg one tablet -Ezetimibe 10 mg one tablet one tablet -Sertraline 50 mg one tablet -Senna Plus one tablet A review of the physician orders dated 9/12/2023 for Resident #79 showed Telmisartan 20 mg one tablet by mouth once daily related to hypertension On 5/22/24 at 3:30 p.m., an observation was conducted during medication administration with Staff D, LPN for Resident #22. Staff D cleared the feeding pump total infused to zero and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide proper infection control practices for two (Residents #51 and #22) out of six residents observed during medication administration. Findings include: On 5/22/24 at 8:40 a.m., an observation was made of Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) administering eye drops to Resident #51. During administration, the tip of the dropper was observed touching the resident's eyelids from one eye to the next eye. Resident # 51 was sitting at an angle of ninety degrees with head tilted down. Resident #51 struggled to open eyes wide unassisted and closed when the eye dropper touched his lids. Staff A continued to administer the eye drops under the same circumstances for the next eye. The eye dropper medication was covered with its cap and returned to the box labeled with the resident's name and then returned to the medication cart. On 5/22/24 at 3:30 p.m., an observation was made of Staff D, LPN during medication administration of physician orders for Resident #22 's enteral feedings. Staff D demonstrated the process…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2022-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and policy review the facility failed to ensure the kitchen equipment and area were maintained in a sanitary manner, and food was prepared, distributed and served in accordance with professional standards for food service safety, to include not ensuring the milk cooler maintained appropriate temperatures as evidenced by a temperature of 49 degrees Fahrenheit, and the facility failed to ensure the two nourishment rooms located on the 200 and 500 hall for residents were maintained and clean as well as have foods that were labeled properly, and foods were disposed of properly for three days (01/11/22, 01/12/22 and 01/13/22) of four days of survey. Findings included: On 01/11/22 between 9:28 a.m. and 10:40 a.m., an initial kitchen tour was initiated with the Dietary Manager (DM) and the observations included: *A ceiling vent above the food service area was noted with dirt and debris. The DM stated the maintenance department should be maintaining vents. *A water bottle was observed on top of the cart near the dish machine and noted with a pink solution.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility did not ensure dignity was maintained for four residents (#71, #23, #25 and #11) of four residents related to 1. three staff members (O, J, H) assisting two residents (#71, #23) with meals while standing, 2. not ensuring catheter bags for two residents (#71 and #11) were covered with privacy bags, and 3. not ensuring privacy during wound care for one resident (#25), for a total of three days (01/11/22, 01/12/22 and 01/13/22) of four days. Findings included: 1. During multiple facility tours on 01/11/22 at 12:45 p.m., 01/12/22 at 9:03 a.m., 01/12/22 at 12:19 p.m., and 01/13/22 at 12:41 p.m., observations were made of Staff O, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) standing while assisting Resident #71 with a meal. An admission Record printed on 01/13/22 showed Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include: other lack of coordination, Type 2 diabetes, Dysphagia, facial weakness, sequelae of Guillain-Barre syndrome,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-01-14 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record review, interviews, and the plan of correction review, the facility failed to ensure it had a functioning Quality Assurance system. The facility was actively involved in the creation, implementation, and monitoring of an effective plan of correction for deficient practice identified during a recertification survey, conducted on 01/11/2022 to 01/14/2022, and cited at F812. The facility developed a plan of correction with a compliance date of 02/14/2022. During a revisit survey, conducted on 02/24/2022, deficient practice was again identified at F812 related to kitchen equipment and food storage. Findings included: The facility developed a plan of correction that included: -All soiled equipment was cleaned on 01/12/22. -Undated/unlabeled food items were disposed of by dietary manager. -Daily sanitation observations of the kitchen, walk in refrigerator/freezer and nourishment rooms will be conducted by the dietary manager and/or designee. -Dietary staff were reeducated on the cleaning and maintenance of kitchen equipment and labeling/dating of foods. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-14 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide services with reasonable accommodation of a resident's need and preference related to smoking during the assigned smoking times for one resident (#59) of a total sample of 15 residents who smoked for four days (01/11/22, 01/12/22, 01/13/22 and 01/14/22) out of four days. Findings included: During a facility tour on 01/11/22 at 10:32 a.m., Resident #59 was observed in his room waiting to be assisted out of bed and to be dressed. Resident #59 stated, I want to get out and have my cigarette. I missed my 9:00 a.m. cigarette. On 01/12/22 at 9:10 a.m., Resident #59 was observed in his room, lying in bed. Resident #59 said, They won't let me go to smoke. I have to get dressed, and no one is assisting me. Resident #59 stated if he missed the smoke time at 9:00 a.m., he has to wait until 1:00 p.m. On 01/12/22 at 12:51 p.m., Resident #59 complained that he still had not had a cigarette. Resident #59 said, They said I missed it, because I…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-14 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services of an indwelling catheter for two residents (#11, and #71) of seven residents with indwelling catheters. Findings included: 1. On 01/11/22 at 12:10 p.m., Resident #11 was observed in his room during lunch. His catheter bag was observed on the floor and not covered by a privacy bag. Resident #11 was non-verbal. On 01/11/22 at 12:50 p.m., Resident #11 was wandering the halls dressed in a hospital gown, open in his back, exposing his brief. Resident #11 was carrying his catheter bag in his hand. The catheter bag was not covered with a privacy bag. Resident #11 was pointing to a full catheter bag asking if it could be emptied. On 01/12/22 at 9:05 a.m., Resident #11 was observed ambulating himself to the bathroom, holding his catheter bag in one hand, the tubing was dragging on floor. Resident #11 mumbled, Help me. At this time Staff J, CNA said to Resident #11, I will be right with you, and as of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-01-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5.00%. A total of twenty-five medications were observed administered, and two errors were identified for two (Resident #21 and #49) of three residents observed. These errors constituted a medication error rate of 8.00 percent. Findings included: On 1/13/22 at 08:30 a.m., an observation of medication administration with Staff A, Registered Nurse (RN), was conducted with Resident #21. Staff A, (RN) was observed administering Advair HFA Aerosol 115-21 MCG (microgram) ACT one (1) application inhale orally two times a day for diagnosis of Shortness of Breath. (SOB). After the medication was administered Resident #21 did not rinse her mouth and spit out with water after inhalation of the medication. An immediate interview with Staff A, (RN) was conducted and Staff A, (RN) stated I forgot, when she was asked why she did not follow pharmacy package directions on the medication. An interview was obtained at the same time with the resident who revealed that she often forgets…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure ordered medication was available to dispense on an as needed (PRN) basis for one resident (#61) of four residents reviewed for the provision of ordered medications. Findings included: Review of the face sheet in the admission record for Resident #61 revealed a diagnosis of pressure ulcer of right buttock, stage 3. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, Section C, Cognitive Patterns, dated 12/11/21 reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicating her cognition was intact. Review of physician's orders in the medical record revealed an order dated 12/23/21 for cyclobenzaprine hcl 5 mg (milligram) every 8 hours as needed for muscle relaxer related to muscle weakness, generalized. On 1/11/22 at 11:35 AM an interview was conducted with Resident #35. She said a nurse told her the prescription for the muscle relaxer disappeared after it was delivered from the pharmacy, and said it took a week and a half to get them reordered and delivered. A review of the Proof of Delivery Shipment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-10-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility did not ensure nutritional parameters were addressed and maintained for one resident (#79), related to weight loss, for three residents reviewed for nutritional care. Findings included: A review of the 10/8/20 Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed Resident #79 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment) and required supervision for eating with one person physical assistance. A review of the physician's orders in the medical record revealed a 9/22/20 order of regular diet dysphagia mechanical soft texture, regular/thin liquids consistency, regular, mechanical soft, thin liquids. A review of the care plan dated 10/20/20 revealed Resident #79 has a nutritional problem r/t (related to) suboptimal meal intake r/t receiving a mechanically altered diet. Diagnoses: dysphasia, diabetes, anemia, aphasia. He has a history of significant weight loss, and major depression. Eats meals with hands at times. Interventions included provide and serve supplements as ordered, RD (registered…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-10-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, record review, and policy review the facility did not practice infection control procedures to avoid potential infection as evidenced by 1) failure to practice hand hygiene during medication administration by one (Staff A) of four nurses observed, and 2) failure to disinfect a glucometer for one (#73) of three residents observed for blood glucose monitoring during the medication administration task by one (Staff A) of four nurses observed. Findings included: 1. On 10/27/20 at 4:27 p.m., Staff A, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) was observed preparing to administer medication to Resident #63. Staff A knocked on the bedroom door. Staff A put on a pair of gloves, verified the resident's identification and checked her temperature. The resident refused the medication. Staff A exited the room still wearing a glove on her left hand. She removed the glove and disposed of it in a trash can on the medication cart. She removed keys from her pocket and opened the medication cart. Staff A, LPN, removed a bottle for wasting/disposing of medications. She poured the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$35,944 in federal fines across 8 penalties.

  • $4,893 — penalty dated 2024-01-08
  • $4,587 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
  • $11,645 — penalty dated 2023-12-11
  • $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-11-20
  • $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-11-13
  • $2,470 — penalty dated 2023-11-06
  • $2,117 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
  • $4,233 — penalty dated 2023-10-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.0-1.0 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.1≈ chain avg
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspire At EvansFort Myers, FL 1 of 5Aviata At BenevaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Big BendPerry, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Bryan DairyLargo, FL 1 of 5Aviata At FletcherTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Palma Sola BayBradenton, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Saint LucieFort Pierce, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SarasotaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The BayTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The PalmsPalm Harbor, FL 1 of 5Aviata At VeniceVenice, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Arbor SpringsOcala, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BradentonBradenton, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BrentwoodLecanto, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Colonial LakesWinter Garden, FL 2 of 5Aviata At EnglewoodEnglewood, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Grand OaksPalm Coast, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Green Cove SpringsGreen Cove Springs, FL 2 of 5Aviata At GreenacresGreen Acres, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Lakeside OaksDunedin, FL 2 of 5Aviata At OakfieldBrandon, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Santa BarbaraCape Coral, FL 2 of 5Aviata At South DaytonaSouth Daytona, FL 2 of 5Aviata At TallahasseeTallahassee, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The HarborSafety Harbor, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - PasadenaSouth Pasadena, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Pompano BeachPompano Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata At West Palm BeachWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata at Sand KeyClearwater, FL 3 of 5Aspire At Ridge HavenNew Port Richey, FL 3 of 5Aviata At BrooksvilleBrooksville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Central ParkBrandon, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Coral BayWest Palm Beach, FL 3 of 5Aviata At CountrysidePalm Harbor, FL 3 of 5Aviata At JacksonvilleJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At North Fort MyersN Ft Myers, FL 3 of 5Aviata At RosewoodOrlando, FL 3 of 5Aviata At San JoseJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At St CloudSaint Cloud, FL 3 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Harbor BeachFort Lauderdale, FL

Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
PARK PARENT LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2023
ST PETERSBURG HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 09/01/2023
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2023
FANA, MIGUELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/01/2024
KEYES-BOWMAN, MICHAELIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/13/2025
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/20/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/20/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/20/2025
HERSKOWITZ, ELIEZERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/20/2025
HERSKOWITZ, YAAKOVIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/20/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/20/2025
ASPIRE MGT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$5.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-24.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$57K
Related-party expense1% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 78%Medicare 6%Other / private 15%

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $57K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$337per resident / day
operating cost
$10,244per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$270per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105895. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-05-23, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next