Aviata At South Daytona

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Met the expected recovery: 51.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 29 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 28% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 23% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 55.1 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.35 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.11 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.45 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.58 to 0.27 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

22 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 10 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility records, the facility failed to ensure the residents' right to be free from neglect by failing to implement sufficient safeguards and supervision to prevent one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care from an avoidable fall with subsequent fractures of the lower right femur (thigh bone) and right patella (kneecap). The facility failed to ensure that staff implemented care plan interventions specifying two-person assistance and the use of a mechanical lift during transfers for Resident #1. On April 22, 2026, one certified nursing assistant (CNA) attempted to transfer Resident #1 from her bed to her chair by using a stand-and pivot method rather than following the resident's care plan indicating the need for a mechanical lift and two staff members for transfers. The resident fell during the transfer and sustained right femur and patellar fractures.Any resident requiring two-person staff assistance during transfers…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-05-20 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and review of facility records, the facility failed to implement sufficient safeguards and supervision to prevent one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care from an avoidable fall with subsequent fractures of the lower right femur (thigh bone) and right patella (kneecap). The facility failed to ensure that staff implemented care plan interventions specifying two-person assistance and the use of a mechanical lift during transfers for Resident #1. On April 22, 2026, one certified nursing assistant (CNA) attempted to transfer Resident #1 from her bed to her chair by using a stand-and pivot method rather than following the resident's care plan indicating the need for a mechanical lift and two staff members for transfers. The resident fell during the transfer and sustained right femur and patellar fractures.Any resident requiring two-person staff assistance during transfers was at risk. There were 19 residents who required two-person…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, facility record review, and a review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure it provided a clean, comfortable and homelike environment in four (Rooms #7, #8, #12 and #16) of 30 sampled rooms.The findings include: 1.On 08/11/25 at 11:07 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed and the bottom portion of the window was missing and covered with a large piece of wood and duct tape. On 08/11/25 at 11:11 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER]'s wall was observed with missing drywall and chipped paint. On 08/11/25 at 11:15 AM, room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed with a wall unit air conditioner missing the control knob and a 3 foot by 2-foot area adjacent to the wall air conditioner unit covered with chipped and bubbling paint. The door frame adjacent to the bathroom door was observed with rotting wood and chipped paint. Several baseboards in the room were missing paint. On 08/14/25 at 9:35 AM, a second observation was made of room [ROOM NUMBER] and the bottom portion of window was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a main nursing station refrigerator observation, facility documentation, staff interviews, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to follow proper sanitation and food handling practices to prevent the outbreak of foodborne illness, with the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents who consumed foods from the facility, by failing to properly monitor and log temperatures of the main nursing station refrigerator. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure.The findings include: A follow-up tour was conducted on 08/13/2025 at 11:05 AM. During the tour, it was observed that temperatures were not accurately monitored for the refrigerator at the main nursing station where resident supplements were stored. Temperature documentation was missing for August 2025. (Photographic evidence obtained) An interview was conducted on 08/13/2025 at 12:17 PM with Registered Nurse (RN)/Infection Preventionist M. When asked who was responsible for checking and logging temperatures for the main nursing station…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, facility document review, and the facility Policy and Procedure, the facility failed to ensure the Pharmacist Medication Regimen Reviews were maintained and carried out to minimize or prevent adverse consequences, to the extent possible for two (Residents #4 and #43) of five residents reviewed in a total survey sample of 30 residents.The findings include: 1.A review of Resident #4's Consultant Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review, dated 2/18/2025, revealed a recommendation made by consultant pharmacist: Need behavior monitoring added to electronic Medication Administration Record (eMAR) while on Trazodone and Zoloft. Another review dated 7/10/2025, included a recommendation to please add behavior monitoring to eMAR while on Trazodone and Sertraline. (Copies obtained) A review of Resident #4's active physician's orders included trazodone HCl (hydrochloride) oral tablet 100 mg (milligrams), give 200 mg by mouth at bedtime related to major depressive disorder, recurrent,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility's infection prevention and control program (IPCP) and adhered to isolation precautions for one (Resident #8) of six residents who were positive for COVID-19, by entering the resident's room without donning the required personal protective equipment (PPE) and transporting the resident without a mask to a common area, exposing other residents to COVID-19. The findings include: On 08/11/25 at 1:00 PM, upon entry to the facility, staff notified the survey team of an outbreak of COVID-19 with six of a census of 59 residents positive for COVID-19. On 08/11/25 at 2:08 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) C was observed exiting Resident #8's room wearing only a surgical mask. Resident #8's door had droplet precaution signage and a fully stocked personal protective equipment (PPE) cart in the hallway adjacent to the door. CNA C reported that she had worked as a CNA at the facility since January of 2025. When she was asked what the facility's policy was for entering a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-14 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
  Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and a review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure that the call system was accessible to residents while in their beds for three (Residents #10, #20, and # 31) of a facility census of 59 residents. The findings include: 1.On 8/12/2025 at 11:35 AM, Resident #10 was observed awake in bed. His call light was observed out of his reach under the bed. He was asked how he would get the staff's attention if he needed help. He stated, You push the button, or you holler out. He was asked if he could reach his call light. He was unable to reach it. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 08/13/2025 at 9:24 AM, Resident #10's call light was observed out of his reach under the bed. (Photographic evidence obtained) On 8/13/2025 at 9:30 AM, an interview was conducted with Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) H. She was asked how residents alerted the staff that they needed help when they were in their rooms. She stated, They use the call light. She was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-07-15 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — widespread
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary and comfortable environment for residents and staff by failing to ensure hot water was available in resident rooms, resident shower rooms and employee bathrooms. This deficient practice had the potential to impact all 51 residents residing in the facility at the time of the survey. The findings include:On 07/14/25 at 12:41 PM, water temperatures in the facility were taken in the presence of the Regional Plant Operations. Using a dial stem thermometer, resident bathrooms, shower rooms and employee hand washing stations were measured and revealed the following:East Sideroom [ROOM NUMBER]: 78 [NAME] #2: 78 [NAME] #3: 91 [NAME] #4: 78 FRooms #5 and #7 (Jack and [NAME]/ shared bathroom): 70 FRooms #6 and #8: 80 FRooms #10 and #12: 80 [NAME] Side Shower Room: 78 FEmployee Restroom [ROOM NUMBER]: 80 FEmployee Restroom [ROOM NUMBER]: 80 FWest SideRooms #16 and #18: 78 FRooms #19…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2023-08-29 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, and staff interviews, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. There were five errors with 38 opportunities for error, resulting in an error rate of 13.15789% and involving four (Residents #24, #29, #44, and #9) of six residents observed during medication administration, from a total of 22 residents in the sample. The findings include: During medication administration on 8/28/23 at 3:45 p.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was observed preparing medication for Resident #24. She obtained Eliquis (anticoagulant) 5 milligrams (mg), Coreg 6.25 mg for blood pressure, another Eliquis 5 mg and Vitamin C 500 mg. She stated medication should be crushed and administered via gastrostomy tube (G-tube - feeding tube). She picked up a pill crusher pouch ready to pour the medication in. She was asked to verify the medications with the orders and she confirmed that she had pulled two tablets of Eliquis 5mg instead of one as was ordered. She removed one Eliquis pill from the medication cup and discarded it. On 8/28/23 at 3:53…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations throughout the facility and interviews with staff, the facility failed to provide a sanitary, homelike environment for residents, staff and visitors by neglecting to maintain walls that housed resident personal air conditioner units in five of five rooms observed on the east wing (rooms 2, 3, 4, 6 and 12) out of 10 rooms on the unit and a total of 22 resident rooms in the facility. The facility also failed to provide needed maintenance and cleaning to the baseboards and the carpeted walls under the handrails on both the east and west wings. The findings include: Observations of the east wing were conducted on 8/27/23 at 12:56 p.m. In room [ROOM NUMBER], approximately 16 inches of the vertical surface wall to the right of the window air conditioner was observed with a significant amount of what appeared to be water damage. The wall was warped, bubbled, and cracking/peeling. The area extended approximately 16 inches up the right side of the unit. A ¼ inch gap between the unit and the wall…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to provide written notification of emergency transfer and failed to send that notification to the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for one (Resident #47) of one resident reviewed for [NAME] Acts (voluntary or involuntary hospital admission for psychiatric care and stabilization), from a total of 22 residents in the sample. The findings include: A review of Resident #47's medical record found he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance, history of transient-ischemic attack (a brief stroke-like attack), mild cognitive impairment, insomnia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder, single episode, moderate. Resident #47's medical record revealed that he had a family member designated as his primary emergency contact and responsible party. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with a reference date…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-08-29 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of resident records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff, the facility failed to provide written information prior to hospital transfer that notified the resident/representative of the facility's bed hold policy for one (Resident #47) of one resident (Resident 47) reviewed for a hospital transfer/Baker Act, from a total of 22 residents in the sample. The findings include: A review of Resident #47's medical record found he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. He had diagnoses including, but not limited to, dementia with behavioral disturbance, history of transient-ischemic attack (a brief stroke-like attack), mild cognitive impairment, insomnia, anxiety, and major depressive disorder, single episode, moderate. Resident #47's medical record revealed that he had a family member designated as his primary emergency contact and responsible party. A quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with a reference date of 8/22/23, noted that Resident #47 presented with continuous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$25,723 in federal fines across 8 penalties.

• $3,529 — penalty dated 2023-10-30
• $3,176 — penalty dated 2023-10-23
• $2,823 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
• $2,447 — penalty dated 2023-10-10
• $2,098 — penalty dated 2023-10-02
• $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-09-11
• $3,728 — penalty dated 2023-08-29
• $3,728 — penalty dated 2023-08-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 70% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $31K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL