No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Aviata At Rosewood

3920 Rosewood Way, Orlando, FL 32808 · For profit - Corporation · 120 certified beds · (407) 298-9335 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (407) 298-9335 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
No harm-level citations or fines — but 34 lower-level deficiencies on record (see below)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (34) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Urgent care / clinic
4780 N Orange Blossom Trl · (407) 206-3326 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
5832 N Orange Blossom Trl · (407) 822-1121 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
5556 Cinderlane Pkwy
Park
5050 Cinderlane Pkwy · (407) 246-2283 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3919 Rosewood Way · (407) 826-1505

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.5%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.2%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.3%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.3%0.7%2.0%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms3.5%4.6%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%2.5%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened10.7%9.5%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.1%14.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%99.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%4.5%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.4%10.5%21.2%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table3.5%8.6%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.9%1.5%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.7%94.7%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission16.4%26.1%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit2.8%9.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.052.131.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.711.151.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

10.4%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.34U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.14hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 55 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.34 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 57% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.4%CMS range 6.8–16.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge63.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge45.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.6%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.5%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalizationnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.351.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.59
RN hours/ resident / day
0.61
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.10
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.29
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.58
RN hoursweekends
42.2%
Total nursing turnover
52.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 109.6 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.29 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.14 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.35 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.58 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-18)
15
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-26)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

34 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 24 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-18 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — pattern
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program by not identifying and addressing repeated deficiencies and by not ensuring complete monitoring documentation for corrective action plans. The deficient practice resulted in a pattern of unresolved quality concerns and had the potential to affect more than a limited number of residents by not ensuring consistent monitoring and follow-up of identified problems.Findings:On a previous survey dated 4/26/24, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Enforcements were issued that included: F0656 (Develop/Implement Comprehensive Care Plan), F0695 (Respiratory/Tracheostomy Care and Suctioning), and F0759 (Free of Medication Error Rate of 5 Percent or More).On 9/18/25 at 2:14 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) explained their QAPI program included a four-step process with: identification of deficient practice, investigation of problem causes, correction of problems, and development of correction plans with goals, timelines,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-18 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct thorough, periodic reviews of Advance Directives to ensure resuscitation status related to Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) orders was accurately documented in the medical record to effectively communicate choices regarding withholding life-sustaining measures for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Advance Directives, of a total sample of 43 residents, (#33).Findings:Review of the medical record revealed resident #33 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including cerebral atherosclerosis (hardening of brain arteries), severe vascular dementia with agitation, brain bleed, major depressive disorder, restlessness and agitation.Review of hospice paperwork revealed resident #33 was admitted to hospice on 4/30/25 with a primary terminal diagnosis of cerebral atherosclerosis. The document indicated resident #33 was at the facility for respite care from 5/30/25 till 6/04/25. A progress note dated 6/10/25 at 4:42…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized Comprehensive Care Plan to include actual skin impairments for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, of a total sample of 43 residents, (# 4).Findings: Review of resident #4's medical record revealed he was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of cerebral infarction (stroke), stage three pressure ulcers- sacral region and right ankle, unstageable pressure ulcers- left ankle/right heel/right upper back and right/left buttocks. Review of resident #4's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 6/30/25 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment, was totally dependent on staff for all his activities of daily living, was at risk for pressure ulcers/injury, had four unhealed stage three pressure ulcers that he was admitted /readmitted to facility with, and had six unstageable pressure ulcers three of which he was admitted /readmitted with to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to conduct scheduled safety/risk evaluations for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Smoking, (#53), of a total sample of 43 residents. Findings:Review of the medical record revealed resident #53, a [AGE] year old male was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and re-admitted from the hospital on 1/02/25 with diagnoses that included muscle weakness, pain in left shoulder, acquired absence of right upper limb above elbow (amputation), acquired absence of left leg above knee, acquired absence of right leg below knee, rotator cuff tear of unspecified shoulder, and polyneuropathy (nerve damage to arms and legs).The most recent Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Significant Change Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 6/27/25 noted resident #53 scored 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status that indicated his cognition was intact. The assessment showed during the look-back period there were no behaviors or rejections of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer Oxygen (O2) therapy as ordered by the physician for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 43 residents, (#4 and #85).Findings:1. Resident #4 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of hemiplegia (one-sided paralysis) following cerebral infarction (stroke), pressure ulcers, and protein calorie malnutrition. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/30/25 revealed the resident had severe cognitive impairment. The MDS assessment noted the resident was dependent on staff assistance with dressing/personal hygiene care and received oxygen therapy. The assessment also noted that the resident did not exhibit behavior symptoms or rejection of care necessary to achieve the resident's goals for health and wellbeing. Review of resident #4's medical record revealed a care plan initiated on 3/31/25 which indicated a resident focus for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered according to physician orders to prevent medication errors for 1 of 5 residents observed during the medication administration task, of a total sample of 43 residents, (#50). There were 2 errors in 32 opportunities for a medication error rate of 6.25%.Findings:Review of resident #50's medical record revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart disease, combined systolic and diastolic heart failure, heart muscle damage, hypertension, nicotine dependence, and stage 2 chronic kidney disease. On 9/16/25 at 9:04 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) C prepared resident #50's scheduled medications at her medication cart. She removed one tablet of chewable 81 milligrams (mg) Aspirin from the cart's stock medication bottle and placed it in a pill cup with the resident's other oral medications. RN C then removed a Nicotine patch (Step 2) 14 mg /24 hour (HR) from the cart. The nurse then…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure admission physician orders for immediate care of surgical sites were obtained for 1 of 2 residents reviewed of a total sample of 7 residents, (#2). Findings Resident #2, a [AGE] year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included fracture of upper and lower end of the right fibula, fracture lower end of the right tibia, and physeal fracture of the lower end of the right fibula. Review of the resident's Medical Certificate for Medicaid Long-Term Care Services And Patient Transfer Form (3008) dated 11/23/24 revealed the resident's primary diagnosis was right ankle fracture, and documentation noted the resident had sutures to her left lower extremity, and an ace bandage wrap to her right lower extremity. The hospital's Brief op (operative) note dated 11/19/24 revealed an operative fixation of the right ankle and removal of external fixator was performed on resident #2. The Orthopedic Trauma…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive individualized care plan for 1 of 3 residents of a total 7 residents, (#5) Findings: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis, major depressive disorder, anxiety, history of falls, and hypertension. On 10/3/24 she was re-hospitalized for chest pain and then returned to the facility on [DATE]. Review of resident's care plan on 11/25/24 revealed a care plan with only one focus which was initiated on 10/24/24. The focus noted the resident had nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem related to hypertension, anemia, major depressive, hemiplegia, hypotension, morbid obesity, venous thrombosis, iron deficiency anemia, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, and Mini Nutritional Assessment score reflects risk for malnutrition. Review of a care plan initiated on 6/26/24 revealed the care plan had been cancelled following resident's transfer to the hospital.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for surgical pin site dressing for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for surgical wounds, of a total sample of 7 residents, (#1). Findings: Resident #1, a 49- year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included anterior dislocation of proximal end of tibia, right knee, generalized weakness, pain in right knee, diabetes type II, cardiac murmur, depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview For Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15. The assessment noted the resident was dependent on staff assistance for activities of daily living, required substantial/maximal assistance of staff for chair/bed-to chair transfer, and had surgical wound(s). Review of the resident's clinical records revealed a physician order dated 3/05/34, to paint pin site with Betadine, pat dry, cover…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were administered per professional standards for 1 of 7 residents, (#3). Findings Resident #3, an 81- year-old female was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with her most recent readmission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included end stage renal disease, diabetes type II, hypertension, chronic pain, and major depressive disorder. On 11/25/24 at 9:57 AM, a medication cup with medications was observed on resident #3's tray table. The resident stated the medications were left there by the nurse, and she would be take the medication momentarily. The resident stated she had breakfast and the nurse bought the medications in, but she fell asleep before taking the medications. On 11/25/24 at 10:00 AM, observation of the cup with medications on the resident's tray table was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) A the resident's assigned nurse. RN A acknowledged the cup with the medications was on the resident's tray table and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 24 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
    Provide appropriate foot care.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow podiatry treatment plan and ensure a timely follow-up appointment with a podiatrist for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for podiatry, of a total sample of 4 residents, (#1). Findings: Review of resident #1's medical record revealed diagnoses of type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral vascular disease, hemiplegia (severe loss of strength) and hemiparesis (weakness) following stroke affecting left non-dominant side. The American Diabetes Association's in the section titled, Foot Complications described, People with diabetes can develop many different foot problems. Even ordinary problems can get worse and lead to serious complications (retrieved from www.diabetes.org on 10/02/24). Review of resident #1's medical record revealed a podiatry visit report with a date of service of 8/22/24. The report detailed on physical exam the podiatrist noted resident #1 was unable to differentiate sharp/dull sensations in both feet. Resident #1 had three nonpalpable (could not be felt by hand) and one diminished pulse, regarding…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was continent of bladder and bowel received services such as scheduled toileting or prompted voiding, and the needed assistance to maintain their continence, for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for bowel and bladder/incontinence care, of a total sample of 4 residents, (#1). Findings: Resdient #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included stroke, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and partial weakness and paralysis of the left non-dominant side after stroke. Review of resident #1's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed resident #1 was cognitively intact with no behavioral symptoms or rejection of care necessary to achieve the resident's goals for health and well-being. Section H of the assessment indicated she was always incontinent of bowel and bladder and that a toileting program (e.g. scheduled toileting, prompted voiding, or bladder training) had not been attempted upon admission or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-02 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and his responsible party access to his personal and medical records following a written request for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for medical grievances, of a total of 6 residents, (#2). Findings: Resident #2 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with a diagnosis of seizures, type 2 diabetes, protein-calorie malnutrition, hypertension, alcohol dependence, anxiety, and history of a brain abscess. The admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12/15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the resident's electronic medical record revealed a document titled Healthcare Power of Attorney which was scanned into the resident's chart on 3/23/24. Under the section Designation of health care agent, the document listed the resident's brother to serve as his health care agent. Under the section titled Medical information and Medical records it indicated,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to revise a fall care plan to reflect fall interventions for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for care plans, of a total sample of 6 residents, (#1). Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple fractures of pelvis, fracture of left patella, dislocation of right hip, displaced fracture of lateral malleolus of left fibula and unsteadiness on feet. Review of resident #1's medical record revealed a Change in Condition evaluation completed dated 3/03/24 which indicated resident #1 slipped out of his wheelchair and was observed sitting on the footrest. Staff assisted resident back into his wheelchair. The form did not list any new interventions to be implemented. The medical record also contained a Change in Condition evaluation dated 3/24/24 which indicated resident #1 was observed as he slid from the seat of his wheelchair onto the footrests. The form also did not list any new interventions…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate fall interventions were in place to prevent further falls for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for falls, of a total sample of 6 residents, (#1). Findings: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including multiple fractures of pelvis, fracture of left patella, dislocation of right hip, displaced fracture of lateral malleolus of left fibula and unsteadiness on feet. Review of the Minimum Data Set quarterly assessment with assessment reference date 2/25/24 revealed resident #1 had long-term and short-term memory problems and severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making. He was dependent on staff for activities of daily living and used a wheelchair for mobility. Review of the facility's incident log revealed resident #1 fell on 1/22/24, 3/03/24 and 3/24/24. Review of the medical record revealed a Change in Condition evaluation completed by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure dishware were rinsed with the proper level of sanitizer in regard to the manufacturer's instructions. Finding: On 4/22/24 at 10:15 AM, during kitchen observation, staff were observed running dishware through the dish machine. Dietary Aide G was observed removing items from the machine and placing them on racks and shelves in the kitchen. The Dietary Manager stated the dish machine was a low temperature machine which used a chemical to sanitize the dishes. He stated the chemical should be at 100 parts per million (ppm) and attempted to test the ppm level twice. The test strips did not activate. The Dietary Manager explained staff could not be sure the dishes were properly sanitized if the chemicals in the strips did not register. He left the dish area to place a call to the chemical supplier. Dietary Aide G continued to remove plates from the machine and stacked them on top of other plates in the plate warmer. The Dietary Manager did not attempt to stop her from mixing unsanitized dishware with sanitized dishware. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0694 — pattern
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician orders, and provide intravenous (IV) care and services according to professional standards of practice to prevent the potential for infection for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for IVs, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#209, & #79). Findings: 1. Resident #209 was admitted to the facility from an acute care hospital on 4/03/24 with diagnoses including sepsis, respiratory failure, perforation of intestine, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, lack of coordination, anemia, end stage renal disease (ESRD), dependent on dialysis, congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathy. The Agency for Healthcare Administration Hospital Transfer Form 5000-3008 dated 4/03/24 showed resident #209 had a primary diagnosis of sepsis, and the skin assessment showed he had a dialysis catheter and Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC) line. A PICC is a thin, flexible tube inserted into a vein in the upper arm and guided (threaded) into a large…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-26 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for Oxygen (O2) therapy and failed to administer O2 therapy as ordered by the physician for 3 of 3 residents reviewed for respiratory care, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#11, #2, and #310). Findings: 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Her diagnoses included hemiplegia (one sided weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle weakness, encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, Alzheimer's disease, slurred speech, lack of coordination, pleural effusion, atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery disease. The 3008-Hospital transfer form dated 3/19/24 included treatment device listed as, Oxygen 2 L (liters) prn [as needed]. On 4/22/24 at 10:55 AM, resident #11 was observed lying in bed alert and confused. It was noted she was not wearing the oxygen nasal cannula (NC). The tubing was instead laying across her chest connected to the concentrator…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate monitoring for potential side effects of anticoagulant medication such as bleeding and bruising for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for Anticoagulant medication, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#209). Findings: Resident #209 was admitted to the facility from acute care hospital on 4/03/24 with diagnoses including sepsis, respiratory failure, perforation of intestine, muscle weakness, difficulty walking, lack of coordination, anemia, end stage renal disease, dependent on dialysis, congestive heart failure and cardiomyopathy. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. The assessment indicated resident #209 was on high-risk medications including a hypnotic and anticoagulant. Special treatments included dialysis while a resident at the facility. Review of resident #209's medical record revealed a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent significant medication error for oral antibiotic therapy, which led to the omission of fourteen (14) doses of the prescribed medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#48). Findings: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft(s), embolism, and thrombosis of arteries of the lower extremities, right above knee amputation (AKA), left AKA, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. The resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed the resident's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview For Mental Status score of 15 out of 15. The assessment noted the resident received antibiotics over the look back period used to complete the assessment. Review of the resident's outpatient office visit note dated 2/14/24 revealed a plan for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an evaluation for self-administration of medication was completed, failed to obtain a physician's order for self-administration of medications, and failed to ensure medications were not stored at the resident's bedside for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for choices, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#95). Findings: Resident # 95 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included quadriplegia, dislocation of C3/C4 cervical vertebrae, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and right and left side lumbago with sciatica. Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set assessment with Assessment Reference Date of 2/23/24 revealed the resident's cognition was intact with a Brief Interview For Mental Status score of 15 out of 15. The assessment noted the resident was dependent on staff assistance for his activities of daily living, and mobility needs. On 4/22/24 at 2:05 PM, resident # 95 was resting in bed watching…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to request a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) level 1 and level II evaluation after a new major mental disorder diagnosis for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for PASARR, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#60). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident #60 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. His diagnosis included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, major depressive disorder, and cocaine abuse. Resident # 60 received a new diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions on 10/03/23. Resident # 60's Annual Minimum Data Set assessment with assessment reference date of 3/12/24 revealed the resident scored 12 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status which indicated he had moderate cognitive impairment with no change in behavior. Review of resident # 60's medical record revealed a Care Plan with revised interventions on 12/04/23 which included psychiatric consult as needed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities, (#11) and 1 of 1 resident reviewed for anticoagulant use, (#209), of a total sample of 39 residents. Findings: 1. Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Her diagnoses included hemiplegia (one-sided weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle weakness, encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain, glaucoma, Alzheimer's disease, slurred speech, lack of coordination, pleural effusion, atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery disease. Review of the electronic medical record on 4/25/24 at 1:06 PM, did not reveal any documentation evaluations or progress notes regarding activities. The current care plans in effect included limited mobility, impaired cognitive function related to Alzheimer's disease, mood problem, impaired vision related to glaucoma, risk of pressure ulcer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a resident centered activities program which met the individual interests and needs of the resident and encouraged both independent and group interactions for 1 out 3 residents reviewed for activities, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#11). Findings: Resident #11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from an acute care hospital. Her diagnoses included hemiplegia (one sided weakness) following cerebral infarction (stroke), muscle weakness, encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic pain, glaucoma, Alzheimer's disease, slurred speech, lack of coordination, pleural effusion, atrial fibrillation, and coronary artery disease. Review of the 5-day Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed her Brief Interview for Mental Status score was 3/15 which indicated severe cognitive impairment. The Daily Activity Preferences showed it was very important to her to listen to music, go outside for fresh air, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate care and services related to following physician orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for gastric tube feeding, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#96). Findings: Review of the medical record revealed resident # 96 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] from the hospital. His diagnosis included dysphagia (trouble swallowing) following cerebral infarction (stroke), hemiplegia, and hemiparesis, and gastrostomy status. Tube Feeding (enteral nutrition) uses a feeding tube to supply nutrients and fluids to your body if you can't safely chew or swallow (Retrieved on 4/29/24 from my.clevelandclinic.org). The Medicare 5- day Minimum Data Set assessment with an assessment reference date of 4/02/24 revealed resident #96 scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status which indicated he was cognitively intact. The assessment also indicated resident #96 had a feeding tube which provided 51 percent or more of his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who experienced trauma received trauma-informed care for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for mood/behavior, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#84). Findings: Resident #84 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including injured in motor-vehicle accident, fracture of sacrum, fracture of one rib, fracture of right femur and fracture of left femur. Diagnoses of anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder were added with an onset date of 10/25/23. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with assessment reference date of 1/25/24 revealed resident #84 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15 which indicated she was cognitively intact. She had impairment to both lower extremities and was dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs). The document revealed resident #84 felt down/depressed/hopeless with little interest or pleasure in doing things nearly every day. She had active…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-26 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was below 5%, by failing to administer the correct dosage of medications per physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents observed for medication administration, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#88). Findings: Resident #88 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic embolism and thrombosis of deep veins of the left lower extremity, acute respiratory failure, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, and thiamine deficiency. On 4/22/24 at 10:03 AM, medication administration observation for resident #88 was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) M. Medications administered by LPN M included Folic acid 400 micrograms (mcg), and Guaifenesin 400 milligram (mg). Folic acid is a B vitamin. It helps the body make healthy new cells (retrieved on 5/01/24 from medlineplus.gov). Guaifenesin is used to relieve chest congestion (retrieved on 5/01/24 from medlineplus.gov).…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolated
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively use its resources to ensure medications were transferred accurately and completely to the facility's Electronic Medical Records (EMR), to prevent significant medication error, and to maintain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#48). Findings: Resident #48 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included atherosclerosis of coronary artery bypass graft(s), embolism, and thrombosis of arteries of the lower extremities, right above knee amputation (AKA), left AKA, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Review of the resident's outpatient office visit note dated 2/14/24 revealed the plan for the resident to continue suppressive antibiotic therapy with oral Cephalexin (Keflex), 500 milligram (mg) twice daily. The prescription dated 2/14/24 was for Keflex 500 mg capsule, take one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure documentation in the medical record was complete and accurate according to accepted professional standards and practices regarding intravenous (IV) dressing change for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for IV care, of a total sample of 39 residents, (#79). Findings: Resident # 79 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included left above the knee amputation, dysphagia, acute respiratory failure, diabetes type II, gastrostomy, and end stage renal disease. Review of the resident's physician orders showed an order dated 4/05/24 to change IV dressing every 72 hours, and as needed. A progress note dated 4/11/24 revealed a midline was inserted in the resident's right upper arm. A midline (midline catheter) is a long, thin, flexible tube that is inserted into a large vein in the upper arm. It is used to safely administer medication into the bloodstream A midline can stay in place for approximately four weeks (retrieved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-26 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's order for contact isolation precautions were implemented for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for Transmission Based Precaution (TBP), of a total sample of 39 residents, (#63). Findings: Resident #63 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included encephalopathy, depression, hypertension, and generalized muscle weakness. A physician's order dated 4/18/24, was for Contact isolation every shift for infection-Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBL) in the urine. Extended Spectrum Beta-Lactamase (ESBLs) are enzymes or chemicals produced by germs like certain bacteria. These enzymes make bacterial infections harder to treat with antibiotics (retrieved on 5/03/24 from webmd.com). On 4/22/24 at 1:34 PM, and on 4/23/24 at 11:51 AM, observations showed an Enhanced Barrier Precaution sign posted on resident #63's room door, and an overdoor container with Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) was in place. Signage for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity related to privacy of catheter drainage bag for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for dignity, out of a total sample of 36 residents, (#69). Findings: Resident #69 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including infection and inflammatory reaction due to cystostomy catheter, neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder and retention of urine. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) admission assessment with assessment reference date of 11/06/22 revealed resident #69 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11 out of 15 which indicated he had moderate cognitive impairment. The document indicated the resident used an indwelling catheter and had a diagnosis of neurogenic bladder. A care plan for an indwelling catheter with neurogenic bladder was initiated on 11/01/22. Interventions included to position catheter bag and tubing below the level of the bladder and away from entrance room door. On 1/08/23 at 10:09 AM, 1/08/23…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-11 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the physician of change in condition for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for change of condition from a total sample of 36 residents, (#52). Findings: Resident #52 was admitted on [DATE], discharged to the hospital on [DATE], and re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of paranoid schizophrenia, major depressive disorder, and urinary tract infection (UTI). Review of the resident's medical record revealed the quarterly 5-day Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with reference date (ARD) 12/16/2022 identified the resident was moderately cognitively impaired, required extensive assistance for activities of daily living, and the resident received antipsychotic medications for 5 of 7 days in the look back period. The resident's care plan for psychotropic medications dated 9/07/22 included monitoring for side effects and effectiveness of psychoactive medications every shift. Resident #52's active medication orders included Valproate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-11 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to refer residents with a newly evident mental disorder for Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) evaluation and determination for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR, out of a total sample of 36 residents, (#21 and #76). Findings: 1. Resident #21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including insomnia, hypertension, transient cerebral ischemic attack, acquired absence of right leg above knee and other recurrent depressive disorders. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) quarterly assessment with assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/02/22 revealed resident #21 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12 which indicated she had moderate cognitive impairment. The document indicated her active diagnoses included depression and schizophrenia. Review of resident #21's care plan revealed a behavior care plan initiated 2/01/21 which indicated the resident exhibited behavior problems related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for activities of a total sample of 36 residents, (#49). Findings: Resident #49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Rhabdomyolysis, mood disorder, major depressive disorder, coronary artery disease, end stage renal disease, and acute kidney disease. Review of resident #49's medical record revealed the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with assessment reference date (ARD) 11/21/2022 identified the resident was cognitively intact and required extensive assistance for activities of daily living (ADL). The MDS completed by the Community Life Director for preferences of activities indicated it was very important for the resident to listen to preferred music, go outside, and do group activities. On 1/09/2023 at 10:30 AM, resident #49 said he was not provided information for facility activities. Review of resident #49's care plan did not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.0≈ chain avg
Staffing 3 of 52.7+0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.1+0.9 vs chain
The other 49 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Aspire At EvansFort Myers, FL 1 of 5Aviata At BenevaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Big BendPerry, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Bryan DairyLargo, FL 1 of 5Aviata At FletcherTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Palma Sola BayBradenton, FL 1 of 5Aviata At Saint LucieFort Pierce, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SarasotaSarasota, FL 1 of 5Aviata At SeminoleSeminole, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The BayTampa, FL 1 of 5Aviata At The PalmsPalm Harbor, FL 1 of 5Aviata At VeniceVenice, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Arbor SpringsOcala, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BradentonBradenton, FL 2 of 5Aviata At BrentwoodLecanto, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Colonial LakesWinter Garden, FL 2 of 5Aviata At EnglewoodEnglewood, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Grand OaksPalm Coast, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Green Cove SpringsGreen Cove Springs, FL 2 of 5Aviata At GreenacresGreen Acres, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Lakeside OaksDunedin, FL 2 of 5Aviata At OakfieldBrandon, FL 2 of 5Aviata At Santa BarbaraCape Coral, FL 2 of 5Aviata At South DaytonaSouth Daytona, FL 2 of 5Aviata At TallahasseeTallahassee, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The HarborSafety Harbor, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - PasadenaSouth Pasadena, FL 2 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Pompano BeachPompano Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata At West Palm BeachWest Palm Beach, FL 2 of 5Aviata at Sand KeyClearwater, FL 3 of 5Aspire At Ridge HavenNew Port Richey, FL 3 of 5Aviata At BrooksvilleBrooksville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Central ParkBrandon, FL 3 of 5Aviata At Coral BayWest Palm Beach, FL 3 of 5Aviata At CountrysidePalm Harbor, FL 3 of 5Aviata At JacksonvilleJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At North Fort MyersN Ft Myers, FL 3 of 5Aviata At San JoseJacksonville, FL 3 of 5Aviata At St CloudSaint Cloud, FL 3 of 5Aviata At The Sea - Harbor BeachFort Lauderdale, FL

Showing 40 of 49; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
3920 ROSEWOOD WAY OPCO PARENT LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2023
3920 ROSEWOOD WAY OPCO HOLDCO LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2023
FREUND, NOCHUMIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/01/2023
BRITTON, MARKIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/21/2021
DYER-FARRELL, LINKAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 09/23/2024
DAGAN, AMITAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
GOLDBERGER, ABRAHAMIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
GOLDBERGER, FAIGYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
HERSKOWITZ, ELIEZERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
HERSKOWITZ, YAAKOVIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
TRAVITSKY, AARONIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
ASPIRE MGT LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2023

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$4.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$243K
Related-party expense5% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 67%Medicare 9%Other / private 24%

This home reported $243K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$308per resident / day
operating cost
$9,378per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$300per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Florida Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Florida
$10,342/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$12,167/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,610/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 105480. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next