Aviata At West Palm Beach

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 41% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 39% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.34 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.547 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 8% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.36 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility neglected to honor a resident's full code status and failed to perform emergency care/cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on 1 of 3 residents reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #1). The facility did not perform basic life support according to the physician's orders and advanced directives and the resident died. The staff neglected to inform administration of the incident. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at 11:15 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed effective [DATE]. The facility self-identified the serious incident as noncompliance that was Immediate Jeopardy and took immediate actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE]. The facility continued to implement corrective actions until they achieved substantial compliance for F600. During the survey, the facility provided to the surveyor a corrective action plan. The surveyor verified the facility's corrective actions to correct the noncompliance for F600 on [DATE], prior to the survey…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-03-13 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolated
  Provide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to honor a resident's full code status and failed to perform emergency care/cardio-pulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on 1 of 3 resident's reviewed for advanced directives (Resident #1). The facility did not perform basic life support according to the physician's orders and advanced directives and the resident died. The Immediate Jeopardy began on [DATE] at 11:15 PM. The Immediate Jeopardy was removed effective [DATE]. The facility self-identified the serious incident as noncompliance that was Immediate Jeopardy and took immediate actions to remove the Immediate Jeopardy on [DATE]. The facility continued to implement corrective actions until they achieved substantial compliance for F678. During the survey, the facility provided to the surveyor a corrective action plan. The surveyor verified the facility's corrective actions to correct the noncompliance for F678 on [DATE], prior to the survey visit.F678 was determined to be past noncompliance as of [DATE]. The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely and appropriate care and services for 5 of 27 sampled residents as evidenced by the failure to provide wound care for non-pressure wounds for Residents #9, #76, and #110; failure to complete weekly skin assessments for Residents #9, #76, #110 and #10; failure to provide supplies and treat edema as ordered for Residents #76 and #110; and failure to administer medications as ordered for Resident #13. The findings included: 1) Review of the record revealed Resident #9 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses to include Diabetes, Morbid Obesity, Congestive Heart Failure, and Non-Pressure Chronic Ulcer of the Right Lower Leg. Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. a) Review of the current physician ordered wound care dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and services for a pressure ulcer as evidenced by not following physician orders to treat a facility acquired pressure ulcer for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident #10).The findings included:Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 on a 0-15 scale indicating severe cognitive impairment.Review of the quarterly care plan dated 08/16/25 revealed a focus that Resident #10 had skin impairment to the sacrum with a goal to promote healing with intervention of staff to administer treatments as ordered and monitor for effectiveness. Review of a wound care consultation note dated 07/03/25, documented that Resident #10 had an unstageable pressure ulcer to her sacrum that measured 5.5cm x 5.0cm x 0.2cm with 90% necrotic tissue.Review of a physician order dated 08/16/2025 instructed staff to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provided care and devices in order to prevent a decrease in range of motion for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for position/mobility, Resident #23. The findings included:Record review for Resident #23 revealed an admission date of 11/29/24. According to the resident's most recent complete assessment, a Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), with a reference date of 08/28/25, Resident #23 was not assessed for cognition due to 'resident is rarely/never understood'. The assessment documented that Resident #23 was dependent upon staff for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Resident #23's diagnoses at the time of the MDS included: Anemia, Coronary Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Aphasia, Non-Alzheimer's dementia, Seizure disorder, Respiratory failure, Aphasia following Cerebrovascular accident, Dysphagia, Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD), Contracture of left elbow. Resident #23's orders included:Restorative: Left elbow splint, 8hrs as tolerated - 11/30/24.Further review of resident's record revealed no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a Reacher for 1 out of 1 resident reviewed for Accidents (Resident #13). The findings included:Record review for Resident # 13 revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, a condition caused by damage to the airways or other parts of the lung, Low Back Pain, Unspecified Dementia, a medical term used for memory loss and confusion, but the cause of the decline cannot be determined and Age Related Osteoporosis without pathological fracture, a condition of progressive bone loss and reduced bone strength due to aging, which increases the risk of future fractures, but in the absence of a current fracture.Review of Section C of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed that Resident # 13 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status of 14, which indicated that she was cognitively intact. Review of Section GG of the MDS dated [DATE] revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record review, observations and interviews, the facility failed to provide treatment and services to prevent complications of enteral feeding (food delivered through a gastric tube) for 1 of 4 sampled residents as evidenced by failure to ensure aspiration (inhaling food or liquid in the airway) precautions for Resident #10 during enteral feeding.The findings included:Review of the facility policy titled Enteral Feeding-Enteral Nutrition Pump revised 11/12/18, documented in part Procedure: Assist resident to semi-Fowler_position (head and upper body raise 30-45 degrees) or turn on his or her right side. Record review revealed Resident #10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly assessment dated [DATE] documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99 on a 0-15 scale indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of medical history revealed a diagnosis of stroke and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Review of the quarterly care plan dated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy review, record reviews, observations, and interviews the facility failed to provide care and services for nebulizer and tracheal suctional for 3 of 3 sampled residents, as evidenced by failure to follow procedure for tracheal (opening that connect voice box to passage to airway) suctioning (remove secretions to keep airway open) and physician order for administration of oxygen for Resident #10, failure to follow physician orders for administration of nebulizer treatment and storage of nebulizer equipment for Resident #94, and failure to store nebulizer equipment properly for Resident #39. The findings included:Review of the facility policy titled Tracheal Suctioning revised 08/24/17, documented in part Tracheal suctioning is an effective way to maintain a clear airway and to aide in the removal of secretions for residents who are unable to clear their secretions with coughing. Procedure: Hyperventilate the resident either manually or mechanically for a few breaths. Assess resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
  Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility assessment, staffing record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff on 6 of 13 weekends reviewed as evidenced by failure to staff as per their facility assessment, failure to ensure provision of wound care on weekends and during the survey for 3 of 4 sampled residents (Residents #9, #10, and #76), and as evidenced by 11 grievances related to patient care logged from April 2025 to the survey date.The findings included:Review of the federal staffing numbers submitted for the third fiscal quarter of 2025 (04/01/25 through 06/30/25) revealed low weekend staffing.Review of the Facility Assessment, revised 02/19/25, documented a general staffing plan to meet resident needs as follows:a) The ratio of licensed nurses to residents on day shift would be 1:22 (7 AM to 3 PM).b) The ratio of licensed nurses to residents on the evening shift would be 1:29 (3 PM to 11 PM).c) The ratio of licensed nurses to residents on night shift would be 1:29 (11 PM to 7 AM). Note the nurses at this facility work 12 hours shifts, from 7 AM to 7 PM and 7 PM to 7…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure standards of practice for administration of medication for 2 of 27 samples residents, as evidenced by failure to ensure medications not left at the beside for Resident #39 and Resident #14.The findings included:1) Record review reveal Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of the quarterly assessment documented a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 on a 0-15 scaled, indicating no cognitive impairment. During an observation on 09/22/25 at 10:50 AM, Resident #39 was noted sleeping in his bed. A clear medication cup with 2 white capsules was observed on his bedside table.During an interview 09/22/2025 3:22 PM, when asked did you take the pills that were left in a medicine cup on your bedside table, Resident #39 he stated. Yes. When asked do you know what the medications was for, he stated, I pretty much know the medications I take when I see them and if it's something I don't recognize, I will let…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-25 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to monitor behaviors and side effects of medications used for mood disorder, for 1 of 5 sampled residents, Resident #9. The findings included: Review of the record revealed Resident #9 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis to include Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Review of the current Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12, on a 0 to 15 scale, indicating the resident had moderate cognitive impairment. Review of the current orders revealed Resident #9 had been receiving Valproic Acid 500 milligrams (mg) three times daily since 06/25/25 for a mood disorder. Review of the September 2025 Medication Administration Record (MAR), the Treatment Administration Record (TAR), and corresponding nursing progress notes lacked any documented side effect or behavior monitoring for the Valproic Acid. During an interview on 09/22/23 during…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication errors for 2 of 4 sampled residents, as evidenced by a medication error rate of 17.14% (6 errors) with 35 opportunities due to failure to ensure that Resident #85 and Resident #42 received medications as ordered and were available.The findings included:1) During an observation of medication administration on 09/24/25 at 8:53 AM, Staff K, LPN prepared a total of 7 pills for Resident #85. She stated, I do not have the inhalers to administer, because they have not arrived from the pharmacy. I will have to call pharmacy to follow up. When asked which inhalers you don't have, Staff K stated The Mometasone and Budesonide. The resident just told me that he hasn't had them for a few days. Staff K, LPN entered the resident's room to administer the medications she had prepared. The resident asked if his gout medication was in the medicine cup, she stated, Yes, the allopurinol is in there. Staff K, LPN told the resident that she will follow up on getting the inhalers reordered.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$33,790 in federal fines across 3 penalties.

• $13,065 — penalty dated 2026-03-13
• $13,065 — penalty dated 2026-03-13
• $7,660 — penalty dated 2025-09-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to AVIATA HEALTH GROUP — 50 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

3 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 78% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $111K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL