Riverside Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 228 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 51.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 164 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 240 beds and averages 218.1 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 22 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.53 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.09 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.19 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.50 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 52% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision to prevent falls for one (Resident #135) of seven residents reviewed for falls, from a total sample of 41 residents. The findings include: A review of Resident #135's medical record revealed that he was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with his most recent readmission occurring on 7/31/23. Resident #135's diagnoses included unspecified fall, unspecified motor vehicle accident with injury; other injury of unspecified body region; and acute embolism and thrombosis of unspecified deep veins of unspecified lower extremity. A review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 6/14/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 possible points, indicating intact cognition. No behaviors were documented. His functional status was documented as follows: Bed Mobility/Self Performance - Total…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, record review, and a review of the facility's policies and procedures, the facility failed to ensure completion of the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) process for two (Residents #51 and #127) residents who were identified with a newly evident or a possible serious Mental Disorder (MD), Intellectual Disability (ID) or related condition, from a total survey sample of 33 residents who were reviewed for PASRR.The findings include:1.A 12/2/25 review of Resident #51's PASRR, dated 9/14/22, revealed in Section I: PASRR Screen Decision-Making, that the resident did not have diagnoses or suspected diagnoses of anxiety disorder, bipolar disorder, depressive disorder, or schizophrenia. (Copy obtained)A review of Resident #51's record revealed an admission date of 12/31/22. Her diagnoses as of 8/7/24 included schizophrenia, unspecified; depression, unspecified; generalized anxiety disorder, and bipolar disorder, unspecified.A review of Resident #51's physician's orders included:Alprazolam (benzodiazepine often used to treat anxiety) oral tablet 0.25 mg…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, record reviews, interviews, and a review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to provide appropriate fingernail care for two (Residents #182 and #196) residents who required assistance with grooming out of 56 residents whose fingernails were observed. Failure to provide consistent grooming and hygiene for residents who require assistance can negatively impact their sense of self-worth and dignity, as well as potentially spread infection and/or contribute to skin tears or other injuries. The findings include:1.A review of Resident #182's medical record revealed an admission date of 7/15/24 and diagnoses including hemiplegia/hemiparesis following a cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the resident's right dominant side and seizures.On 12/01/25 at 12:33 PM, Resident #182 was observed propelling himself in a wheelchair down a corridor within the facility. He was observed to be speech impaired but was able to answer simple yes or no questions. He was able to understand what was being conveyed, but could only answer verbally, yeah. He also used…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to provide respiratory therapy, consistent with professional standards of practice, for three (#9, #63, and #181) of 21 residents receiving oxygen therapy. Oxygen flow rates set for these residents were not in accordance with their physicians' orders. The findings include: 1.On 12/01/25 at 11:46 AM, Resident #9 was observed resting in bed with oxygen infusing at 4 liters per minute (LPM) via nasal cannula (NC). (photographic evidence obtained) On 12/02/25 at 9:25 AM, a review of the resident's active physician's orders revealed an order for oxygen at a flow rate of 3 LPM via NC for Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) (ordered 10/29/25). On 12/02/25 at 1:37 PM, Resident #9 was observed sitting up in bed with her lunch meal on the bedside table in front of her. Oxygen was infusing at 4 LPM via NC. (photographic evidence obtained) A review of Resident #9's medical record revealed an admission date of 2/13/24…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, record review, and a review of facility policies and procedures, the facility failed to demonstrate safe, sanitary infection control and prevention procedures while providing resident care and services. The findings include:On 12/04/25 at 12:18 PM, an observation was made of Registered Nurse (RN) G performing scheduled fingerstick blood glucose testing/monitoring. After checking the resident's blood glucose, the nurse discarded the used lancet in a trash container in the resident's bathroom. When the act of throwing the used lancet in the trash container was brought to RN G's attention, she acknowledged that she had disposed of the lancet in the trash container and not the used sharps container. RN G then extended her ungloved hand into the trash container and retrieved the used lancet. She stated, It doesn't have a sharp end on it after we use it. She did not wash her hands before returning to her medication cart. Once there, she applied hand sanitizer and proceeded to move her medication cart to the next resident she intended to service. On…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-02 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents in regard to 1) call light not properly working in Resident #6's room, and 2) water dripping from a vent in the ceiling going into a trash bin in Resident #5's room, out of 8 resident rooms sampled. The findings include:1.During a tour of the Memory Care unit in the facility on 9/2/2025 at 10:05 am, a flashing red light making an audible sound was observed above room [ROOM NUMBER]. Two (2) staff members were at the nurses' station approximately 5 feet away room as well as several residents in the lounge area approximately 3 feet away from the room. Several staff members were observed walking on the unit. None of them made an effort to respond to the flashing red call light or the audible sound that it was making. Further observation revealed a housekeeper was cleaning the room. The light remained flashing, making an audible sound after the housekeeper exited…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews, facility grievance log review, and complaint and grievance policy review, the facility failed to follow facility policy in providing required written notification of the outcome of the grievance investigation for 5 of 5 grievances submitted by four (Residents #4, #5, #6, and #7) residents. The findings include: On 4/24/24 at 10:34 am, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse-A, Manager 1 North regarding resident grievances. He explained that if a resident has a complaint or grievance, staff is to let the manager know. The manager will then try to resolve the issue at bedside, if unable, the manager will contact social services and the issue will be discussed in morning meeting. On 4/24/24 at 11:25 am, an interview was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse-B. She stated that if a resident or family member complains, she attempts to resolve the issue at bedside. If she's unable to resolve the issue, then she would let the manager know. A review of the facility grievance log from December 2023 to present revealed the following: (Copy obtained) 12/22/23:…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2023-11-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, facility document review, and facility policy and procedure review, the facility failed to ensure that the dietary staff was trained and knowledgeable about the proper procedures for hand hygiene and disposable glove use during meal service, as well as proper sanitation practices when cleaning and using the meat slicer to prevent cross contamination, with the potential to affect all of the residents in the facility who received food from the facility's kitchen. Specific instruction on hand hygiene and sanitation is important in health care settings serving nursing home residents due to the risk of serious complications from foodborne illness as a result of their compromised health status. Failure to thoroughly clean and sanitize the meat slicer could result in the development of a cross-contamination infection and clinical compromise. Unsafe food handling practices represent a potential source of pathogen exposure. The findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 11/13/2023 at 9:30 a.m., the meat slicer was covered with a large…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the the facility failed to provide documented evidence that all alleged violations of abuse, neglect, exploitation, and/or mistreatment were thoroughly investigated for one (Resident #75) of 41 residents sampled. Failure to thoroughly investigate alleged violations places other residents at risk for abuse, neglect, exploitation and mistreatment. The findings include: On 11/13/23 at 1:54 p.m., Resident #75 stated last week she noted that $400.00 of her money was missing. She stated she notified the nurse and added that she was afraid to leave her room, as she did not know what else might come up missing. A review of Resident #75's record revealed that she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a readmission on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included type 2 diabetes with diabetic neuropathy, anxiety disorder, and depression. The Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 9/29/23, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13 out of 15…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2023-11-16 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, resident record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) program under Medicaid, to the maximum extent practicable, to avoid duplicative testing and effort for one (Resident #17) of 41 residents sampled. The facility failed to refer residents with newly evident or possible serious mental disorders, intellectual disability, or a related condition for a level II resident review. The findings include: A record review for Resident #17 was conducted on 11/14/23 at 10:45 a.m. The PASARR could not be located. The facility was asked to provide the documentation. Two PASARRs were provided, one dated 4/24/2015 and the other dated 12/31/2015. Neither of the PASARRs reflected the resident's diagnosis of dementia or unspecified psychosis. The record revealed that Resident #17 was readmitted to the facility on [DATE] after having been hospitalized . Her diagnoses included unspecified…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-16 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure that one (Resident #2) of 41 residents sampled, was appropriately screened for a mental disorder (MD), intellectual disability (ID) or other related conditions prior to admission. Failure to ensure residents are pre-screened for MD/ID or a related condition, prior to admission to the facility, could prevent the resident from attaining or maintaining his/her highest practicable level or result in decline in the resident's physical, mental or psychosocial well-being. The findings include: A review of Resident #2's medical record revealed that a Level 1 PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review) evaluation was documented and dated 07/28/2010, which was more than 10 years prior to her admission to this facility on 02/17/2021. Per the resident's Annual, Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/1/2022, there was no indication of where…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$17,777 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $5,975 — penalty dated 2023-11-16
• $11,802 — penalty dated 2023-11-16

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 47 rows in the source record cover these 29 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

18 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in FL