Birchwood Plaza

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.14 therapist hours per resident per day in 2025Q4 — more than 11% of the 13,714 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 14% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 138.4 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.88 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.07 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.64 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

31 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 20 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to properly transfer a resident (R2) who is totally dependent on staff for transfers; and failed to ensure that R2 was free from injuries of unknown origin for one of four residents (R2) reviewed for Injury of Unknown Origin on the sample list of four. These failures resulted in R2 sustaining a left tibia comminuted fracture involving the tibia with multiple fracture clefts, pain and swelling to the left leg. Finding include: R2's face sheet shows that R2 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to: Nondisplaced comminuted fracture of shaft of the left tibia subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] shows that R2 requires Total dependence two-person assistance for transfers. R2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) shows that R2 has memory problems. On 09/25/23 at 12:23 PM, R2 was observed in bed awake and alert not able to communicate needs. V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policies by a) not ensuring all food items in the kitchen were labeled/dated, b) having expired food items in the kitchen, c) not recording temperatures for the refrigerators, freezers, dishwasher, and d) not following manufacturer instructions to use the three-compartment sink. This failure has the potential to effect 135 residents that eat food from the kitchen.Findings include:2/4/26 at 10:07 AM, toured facility kitchen with V18 (Food Service Supervisor) and observed:-a pan in the refrigerator labeled gelatine with prep date 1/27/26 and use by date 2/2/26-bucket of corn flake crumbs labeled with no prep date or opened date and use by date 12/30-bucket with rice inside labeled breadcrumbs with prep date 1/19/26 and use by date 1/23/26-a pan in the refrigerator covered with aluminum with meat balls/hamburgers 1/30/26 written on it. No indication if 1/30/26 is the date placed in the refrigerator or the date to discard.-a 55lb bag of Pizzeria Wheat Flour labeled 013125. V18 stated it was supposed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0557 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain dignity for one (R93) of three residents reviewed for dining services in a sample of 27.R93 is a [AGE] year-old individual whose current face sheet includes medical diagnosis but not limited to: unspecified dementia, moderate, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety, other diseases of pharynx.MDS (Minimum Data Set) section c- cognitive status dated 12/16/2025 documents R93's brief interview for mental status (BIMS) as 4/15, indicating R93 has severe cognitive disabilities. section gg-self-care dated [DATE], documents R93 requires supervision touching assistance. On 02/04/2026 at 12:21PM, R93 was observed eating lunch dosing on and off. V8 (Certified Nursing Assistant -CNA) was observed going into R93's room, woke R93 and asked R93 if she wanted assistance with eating her food. R93 nodded her head yes. V8 stood over R93 and started feeding R93. V8 stated she is supposed to sit down while…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to follow their policy on resident's unable to use a call light by posting the lighthouse sign outside the room for one (R32) in a total sample of 27 residents reviewed.Findings include: R32's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated on January 6, 2026, Brief Interview Score of 10, indicates that R32 is moderately cognitively impaired. Care plan with review date of 10/13/2025 documents in part, R32 is not able to use a call light. Purposeful rounding will be observed. Lighthouse posted outside room with bed number. On 02/04/2026 at 12:10 PM, Surveyor observed R32 sitting in her chair while finishing up her lunch. R32 is well groomed, appears to be calm and in a good mood. R32 appears to be comfortable and free of pain. R32 is alert and oriented to person with confusion of place and time. Surveyor did not observe the light house sign inside or outside R32's room. On 02/04/2026 at 12:12 PM, R32 stated she has concerns with staff not coming to help her when she needs them. Surveyor asked R32 if she utilizes the call light…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure advance directive or code status is consistent with the comprehensive care plan of one (R17) out of six residents reviewed for advance directive in a sample of twenty-seven. Findings Include: R17's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] shows she is moderately cognitively impaired. R17's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed she was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and she is [AGE] years old with diagnoses not limited to malignant neoplasm of unspecified site of unspecified female breast, iron deficiency anemia secondary to blood loss (chronic), other cerebral infarction, post-traumatic stress disorder, hypertensive heart disease without heart failure, and moderate persistent asthma with status asthmaticus. Physician Order Sheet active order as of [DATE] revealed; Do Not Resuscitate/DNR dated [DATE]. On [DATE] at 10:07 AM, R17 stated that her code status is DNR because she has lived for seventy-six years, and she would like for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolated
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records confidentiality for one (R29) of three residents reviewed in a sample of 27.R29 is an [AGE] year-old individual whose current face sheet documents medical diagnosis to include but not limited to type 2 diabetes mellitus with hypoglycemia without coma, chronic kidney disease, unspecified, unspecified osteoarthritis, unspecified site. MDS Section C - Cognitive Patterns documents R29's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 10/15 indicating R29 has moderate cognitive impairment.On 02/04/2026 at 12:25PM, V4's computer was observed on team one's medication cart in the middle of hallway with R29's personal health records (Medication administration Record) visible to anyone passing by the hallway. V4 (registered Nurse) was observed away from her computer standing near the dining room talking to a resident family member. V4 stated she was approximately 12 feet away from her computer and should have locked her computer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0640 — isolated
  Encode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to follow the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) manual to ensure timely submission of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for three (R5, R38, and R131) out of eight residents reviewed in a total sample of twenty-seven.Findings Include:Resident R5's annual MDS assessment dated [DATE] was submitted on 01/31/26.Resident R38's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was submitted on 01/31/26.Resident R131's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] was submitted on 01/31/26, all exceeding the 14-day submission requirement.On 02/06/26 at 2:28 PM, V3 (Director of Nursing) stated that she is responsible for completing the Resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, ARD stands for the assessment reference date and that is when the assessment is due. She stated that fourteen days from the ARD, the completed assessment must be submitted to the federal agency. The accepted date posted on R5, R38, and R131 reflects the assessment was submitted to the federal agency…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to acquire preadmission screening and resident review for 1 out of 7 residents (R12) in a total sample of 27 resident reviewed for resident assessment. These failures affect 1 resident (R12) in determining correct care settings for a resident with serious mental illness.Findings include:R12's MDS (minimum data set) dated on December 24, 2025, Brief Interview Score (BIMS) of 5, indicates that R12 is severely cognitively impaired.On 02/05/2026 at 11:24 AM, during record review for preadmission screening and resident review (PASRR) documents in part, short term approval without specialized services. Date of determination: April 5th, 2025. Date short term approval ends: August 3, 2025. On 02/06/2026 at 9:00 AM, V2 (Associate Administrator) stated the new PASRR Determination report was run today at 7:02 AM. V2 stated R12 does not require specialized services. V2 stated the results will be available to view on Monday 02/09/2026.On 02/06/2026 at 9:51 AM, V13 (Office Manager) stated it is important to follow up with the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-02-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to have a person-centered care plan that is consistent with the resident's current condition, goals, and services for one (R84) resident out of eight residents reviewed in a total sample of 27 residents. This failure places residents at risk to be provided with inappropriate care and services to meet the resident's physical, mental and/or psychosocial needs. On 02/04/2026 at 12:50 PM, R84 was sitting on specialized chair, with a call light button, a red string attached to her right upper arm, on part of the gown. R84 noted to be very hard of hearing. Not able to hear. R84 asked this surveyor to grab R84's hair. This surveyor attempted to explain to R84 that she cannot assist her but will find someone to come and help her. R84 stated I didn't hear that, I try to read their lips. On 02/06/26 at 11:15 AM, V14 (Social Worker) stated that R84 is having a hard time of hearing, she can understand, when you talk to her, you have to talk to her closely…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that one (R3) resident who depends on staff assistance for their ADL (Activities of Daily Living) care received shaving out of eight residents reviewed in a total sample of 27. This failure places residents at risk of being provided with inappropriate care and services to meet the resident's physical, mental and/or psychosocial needs. On 02/04/2026 at 12:25 PM, R3 was noted with facial hair on her chin. R3 stated that she takes showers and staff assist her. R3 stated that staff have not removed R3's facial hair. R3 stated that she was not sure if they were rushing or not. R3 appears calm and cooperative, no behaviors noted. R3 noted with her head shaking a little. On 02/05/26 at 1:55 PM, R3 sitting on a chair, next to R3's bed, wearing own clothes, not shaved, still with facial hair on her chin. R3 preferred to speak in Spanish. R3 stated that no staff have come to ask R3 if she wanted to be shaved. R3 stated that she feels bad with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to a.) ensure staff followed contact isolation precautions to prevent spread of infections for one (R81) of three residents reviewed b.) ensure that its staff follow the facility's policy and maintain clean technique/infection control practice while performing incontinence care to one (R8) resident out of eight residents reviewed in a total sample of 27. R81's current face sheet documents medical diagnosis to include but not limited to: sepsis, unspecified organism, cystitis, unspecified with hematuria, personal history of urinary (tract) infections, type 2 diabetes mellitus with unspecified complications, pneumonia, unspecified organism, other specified disorders of bladders of bladder. MDS (Minimum Data Set) section C-(Cognitive abilities) dated [DATE], documents R81's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as 10/15, indicating R29 has cognitive moderate impairment. R81's Physician Order Sheet POS) dated 2/2/026 documents: Contact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 90 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $936K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL