Birchwood Plaza

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

42.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 66 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 75.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 61 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.17 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 16% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 138.4 residents a day — about 69% occupied, or roughly 62 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.11 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.13 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.17 on weekdays — 6% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 26% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to properly transfer a resident (R2) who is totally dependent on staff for transfers; and failed to ensure that R2 was free from injuries of unknown origin for one of four residents (R2) reviewed for Injury of Unknown Origin on the sample list of four. These failures resulted in R2 sustaining a left tibia comminuted fracture involving the tibia with multiple fracture clefts, pain and swelling to the left leg. Finding include: R2's face sheet shows that R2 has a diagnosis which includes but not limited to: Nondisplaced comminuted fracture of shaft of the left tibia subsequent encounter for closed fracture with routine healing. R2's Minimum Data Set, dated [DATE] shows that R2 requires Total dependence two-person assistance for transfers. R2's Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) shows that R2 has memory problems. On 09/25/23 at 12:23 PM, R2 was observed in bed awake and alert not able to communicate needs. V4 (Certified Nursing Assistant) was observed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff are feeding residents from a seated position during dining service which affected R7, R62, R73, and R77 in the total sample of 75 when reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 11:41 am, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA) observed positioning R77 upright in R77's reclining wheelchair and provided R77 the lunch meal tray on top of the table over R77's lap. V13 opened up R77's plate cover to reveal a puree diet, set up food items close to R77 and utensils within reach. R77 began slowly touching a bowl on R77's tray. On 3/31/25 at 11:47 am, R77 is observed trying to eat the puree diet meal tray in front of R77 without R77 actively spooning food into R77's mouth. On 3/31/25 at 11:53 a.m., V13 (CNA) was observed standing next to R77, looking down at R77 in the reclining wheelchair. While in a standing position, V13 took R77's utensil and fed R77 three bites of food from R77's lunch meal tray. V13 then…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide fall prevention interventions for residents who are at risk for falls and failed to ensure that residents at risk for falls do not have repeated falls. These failures affected 3 residents (R23, R43, and R58) who had repeated falls, and have the potential to affect one resident (R34), reviewed for falls and fall prevention interventions, in a total sample of 75 residents. Findings include: On 4/2/25 R23 was observed sitting at the edge of the bed with no staff nearby in the hallway. R23 had a wound dressing on the right foot and dark blue sock with smooth bottom on the left foot. The surveyor asked R23 if he(R23) needed some help. R23 stated that he's trying to exercise his legs. The surveyor called V23(RN/Registered Nurse) to assist R23. V23 stated I will get the CNA (Certified Nurse Assistant) to give him non-skid socks. Inquired from V23 if it was okay for R23 to not have proper footwear while awake and trying to exercise at the bedside, considering the fact that R23 has had several falls in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and records review, the facility failed to coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review (PASARR) program and failed to refer level II residents and residents with possible serious mental disorder and/or intellectual/developmental disability, for level II resident review upon a significant change in a mental status assessment. These failures affected three residents (R22, R34, R76) and have the potential to affect additional 34 residents with diagnosis of mental disorder and/or intellectual/developmental disability in the whole facility in a sample of 75. Findings include: On 3/31/2025 at 2PM, Review of facility's admission Record, shows R22 admission Date to facility on 3/27/2012, with diagnosis included but not limited to: Unspecified Dementia (Unspecified Severity), Major Depressive Disorder (Recurrent), bipolar disorder (Unspecified), Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following nontraumatic intracerebral Hemorrhage. On 04/01/25 at 12:55 PM, facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's psych diagnoses were included in the pre-admission screening. This failure affected 1 (R109) resident reviewed for accuracy of pre-admission screening in the total sample of 75 residents. Findings include: R109's (printed 03/31/2025) Diagnosis Report documented that R109's diagnoses: (include but not limited to) schizoaffective disorder and schizophrenia with onset date of 05/24/2022. R109's (5/24/2022) Psychotropic consent documented, in part Risperdal 0.5mg twice daily. Supporting Diagnosis: Schizophrenia. R109's (Active Order as Of: 04/03/2025) Order Summary Report documented, in part Anti-psychotic episodic medication Use: monitor and observe. Active: 02/25/2023. Behavior monitoring related to psychotic disorder with delusions due to known physiological condition, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder. RISPERIDONE 0.5 MG TABLET Give 1 tablet orally two times a day related to SCHIZOPHRENIA. Active. 02/25/2023. R109's (Minimum Data Set documented, in part Section C. Cognitive Patterns. C0500. BIMS…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely oral care for a dependent resident (R44) and failed to provide personal hygiene shaving care for a female, dependent resident (R56) which affected 2 residents (R44, R56) in the total sample of 75 residents when reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL) care. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 11:14 am, R56 is observed laying in bed and noted with mustache hair that is dark gray hair on upper sides of lips. R56 is observed with gray and white hair chin hair, about 1/2-3/4 inch in length, on underside of R56's chin. When asked if R56 is comfortable with the lengthy facial hair, R56 stated, I (R56) would prefer not to have it. When asked if R56 has been offered during ADL care by the CNA to shave the facial hair, R56 stated no. R56 stated, I would take care of it at home, but I am not at home and need help. R56's admission Record documents, in part, diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic respiratory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-03 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident ordered for Enteral g-tube (gastrostomy tube) feeding received the correct amount of Enteral feeding. This failure affected one resident (R76) out of one resident reviewed for Enteral/G-tube feeding in a sample of 75 residents. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 10:35 AM, R76 was observed laying in her bed resting. R76 is alert and talkative, denies pain or discomfort when asked on interview. R76's Enteral g-tube feeding bottle was observed with a date of 3/31/25 but the Enteral g-tube feeding machine was off and not connected to the resident at that time. R76's Enteral g-tube bottle was observed by this surveyor with 1/3 of the Enteral g-tube feeding amount gone from the bottle. On 3/31/25 at 10:40 AM, V12(Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN) stated she did not turn the g-tube feeding off and doesn't know who turned it off or how long it was off. On 04/01/25 at 11:00 AM, V12(LPN) stated she is the nurse in charge of R76 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that staff perform hand hygiene during resident dining service prior to feeding a resident, in between feeding separate residents, and after staff touching their personal body then feeding a resident to prevent and/or contain the possible spread of infectious microorganisms. These failures affected R28, R43 and R77 in the total sample of 75 when reviewed for infection control. Findings include: On 3/31/25 at 12:00 pm, V13 (Certified Nursing Assistant, CNA) observed sitting on the stool chair feeding R77 in the dining room. V13 is observed sitting positioned next to R77 (who is sitting on V13's right side) and also next to R43 (who is sitting on V13's left side). R43 is observed feeding R43's self while sitting in R43's reclining wheelchair. V13 observed stopping from feeding R77, and V13 reaches over to R43's tray then touches and moves R43's blue coffee cup which was in contact with the remainder of R43's brown bread crusts that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure that medication cart, treatment cart with residents' medication was not left un-attended and unlocked when not in the visual proximity of the nurse and not in use to prevent tampering and accidental hazard. This failure has the potential to affect all the 40 residents residing on the 1st floor of the facility. Findings include: On 12/24/24, at 10:30 AM, on the 1st floor, the medication cart was noted in the hallway without a nurse present and not within the nurse vicinity. V6 LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) who oversaw the medication cart stated that I just went to pick up something. When asked about facility policy on medication storage /medication cart storage. V6 stated that the medication cart must be locked when not in use or where the nurse can see it. At 10:40 AM, the treatment cart was noted unattended to and unlocked with resident treatment medication noted in the cart in the hallway. When V2 DON (Director of Nurse's) who was coming out of the elevator was shown the cart and was asked about the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent co-mingling of dented food cans with undented ones; failed to ensure that the ice machine is in a clean condition and failed to label, discard left-over food items, and prepared food items according to their food labeling policy and procedure. This failure has the potential to affect all 145-residents eating from the facility kitchen. Findings include: On 12/24/24, at 10:10 AM, during kitchen observation with V1 (Administrator) and V5 (Dietary Manager) the following were observed: In the dry storage room [ROOM NUMBER] LBS banana pudding can and 6.5 LBS diced peaches were observed dented and co-mingled with un-dented cans. V5 stated that I don't usually put them together (stored) but it a is a small dent and it's nothing. V1 who was present at the time stated, they should be removed. In the 2nd dry storage area, a white bucket labelled breadcrumbs noted with no open date and no used by date. In the walk-in freezer, seven (7)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure food items were labeled, discard expired food items, label dry storage items with a delivery date to ensure first-in-first-out policy is followed and store scoops outside of food bins. These failures have the potential to affect all 142 residents receiving food prepared in the facility's kitchen. Findings include: On 03/05/24 at 9:32 AM, started initial kitchen tour with V4 (Dietary Aide) because V5 (Food Service Supervisor) was not in the building yet. V4 stated everything in the walk-in refrigerator should be labeled and dated with a prepared date and use by date. V4 stated prepared food items should be discarded after seven days. On 03/05/24 at 9:50 AM, V5 (Food Service Supervisor) arrived in the kitchen and stated all items in the refrigerator need to be labeled and dated so that the staff knows when to discard what has been prepared. Items need to be used within seven days with day one being the date the food was prepared. On 03/05/24 between 9:36 AM - 10:12 AM, observed the following items in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 9 rows in the source record cover these 4 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

2 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 94% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $936K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IL