No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Woodbridge Health Campus

602 Woodbridge Ave, Logansport, IN 46947 · Government - County · 69 certified beds · (574) 753-3223 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (574) 753-3223 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)
Insights

On the public record, this home looks stronger than most — but visit before you decide.

In its favor
  • a strong health-inspection score (4/5) — the hardest rating to game (though it’s ranked within its own state, not nationally)
  • no harm-level citations in the current inspection record
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • a high payroll-based staffing rating (4/5)
  • lower-than-typical staff turnover (29% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

5/5
CMS overall
5 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 4 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 4 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1807 Smith St · (574) 516-1223 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
800 Fulton St · (574) 722-5600 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
1626 E Broadway St · (574) 398-5170 · Call to confirm hours
Park
1701 Dividend Dr · (574) 753-7388 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
616 N State Road 25 · (574) 753-4872

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 5 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating5★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.5%11.0%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight10.9%5.5%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.4%0.9%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%1.1%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms7.9%25.2%6.5%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury6.3%3.9%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.8%11.9%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication19.6%23.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.4%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers0.0%3.6%4.7%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control20.2%23.3%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.5%13.6%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.9%79.0%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission13.6%22.2%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit12.3%10.8%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days0.721.611.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.971.441.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 166 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.5%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
8.9%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
74.2%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.44U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.26hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.14hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 74.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 89 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.44 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 75% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.5%CMS range 54.6–69.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF8.9%CMS range 6.0–12.210.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge74.2%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.3%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge70.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.0%CMS range 3.8–9.57.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.291.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.99
RN hours/ resident / day
0.42
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.24
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.66
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.83
RN hoursweekends
28.6%
Total nursing turnover
42.9%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 69 beds and averages 60.9 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.99 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.24 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.13 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.06 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 29% is below the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

4
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-06-03)
1
at the previous standard inspection (2024-04-26)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

11 citations, most serious first — scroll within the box to see all.

  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's advanced directives were updated for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for advanced directives. (Resident 19) Finding Includes: The clinical record for Resident 19 was reviewed on [DATE] at 2:04 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, right hip fracture, cognitive communication deficit, metabolic encephalopathy, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, congestive heart failure, and atrial fibrillation. A current care plan, dated [DATE], indicated Resident 19 had advanced directives. The care plan was not specific on what his advanced directives included. Interventions included, but were not limited to, advanced directives reviewed quarterly and as needed, code status as ordered, and honor durable POA's (Power of Attorney) decision. A current physician's order in Resident 19's electronic medical record, dated [DATE], indicated the resident was to be a full code. An out of hospital DNR form, dated [DATE] and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) was completed when a resident received a new mental health diagnosis and was prescribed an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 46) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 46 was reviewed on 6/2/25 at 11:30 a.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, anxiety, dementia with psychotic disturbance, psychotic disorder with delusions due to a known physiological condition, and depression. A PASARR level I, dated 9/11/24, indicated the resident had a diagnosis of anxiety disorder and depression and no level II was required. A physician's order, dated 9/14/24, indicated quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) 25 mg (milligram) twice a day related to a psychotic disorder with delusions due to a known physiological condition. The diagnosis of psychotic disorder with delusions due to a known physiological condition was added on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure daily weights were obtained as ordered and to ensure the physician was notified of weight changes as ordered for 2 of 2 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 9 and 10) Findings include: 1. During an observation, on 5/28/25 at 11:04 a.m., Resident 9 was lying in bed and had audible wheezes. The clinical record for Resident 9 was reviewed on 5/28/25 at 1:30 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, shortness of breath, acute kidney failure, hypertensive, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A care plan, dated 3/26/25, indicated the resident had congestive heart failure and had the potential for complications. The interventions included, but were not limited to, obtain weights as ordered. A physician's order, dated 5/29/25, indicated to weigh the resident daily and notify the physician of a weight gain of 2 pounds or greater in one day, or for a plus or minus of 5 pounds in one week. A progress note, dated 5/30/25 at 6:56…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-06-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were prescribed as ordered to prevent significant medication errors for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for medication errors. (Resident 202) Findings include: The clinical record for Resident 202 was reviewed on 5/28/25 at 2:40 p.m. The diagnoses included, but were not limited to, a history of a deep vein thrombosis (a blood clot in a deep vein), peripheral vascular disease, hyperlipidemia, anemia, hypertension. Resident 202 was admitted to the facility from the hospital on 5/23/25. An admission observation and data collection form, dated 5/23/25, indicated that the resident would be free from complications and adverse side effects from any medications and administer anticoagulant medications as ordered. A hospital discharge note, dated 5/23/25, indicated Resident 202 was to continue taking the medication Eliquis (an anticoagulant or a blood thinner used to prevent and treat blood clots in various cardiovascular conditions) twice a day for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-04-26 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensurefood was handled to maintain food safety related to discarding and thawing. 52 of 52 residents residing in the facility ate food prepared in the kitchen. Findings include: During an Observation of the kitchen on 4/22/24 at 9:10 AM with Dietary Staff 3, on the bottom of the large rack located in the walk in cooler, there was two containers with of poultry stacked on top of each other. The top one was a mid-size container with a label: prep on 4/19/24 at 12:54 PM and use by 4/21/24 end of day. The bottom one was a large size container with a label: prep pan 4/19/24 at 12:54 PM and use by 4/21/24 end of day. At 9:12 AM right above the two large containers of poultry in a large silver sheet pan, was a package turkey. underneath the package turkey there was a reddish, brown liquid. The turkey nor the pan was dated to indicate when the thurkey had been thawed At 9:15 AM, on the shelf there was a large clear bag with 2 pizza doughs inside. The prepared date indicated 4/12/24 and use by 4/19/24. At 9:17 AM, on the shelf there…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-18 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure nonpharmacological interventions were implemented prior to administering a duplicate antianxiety medication, to document potential medication side effects and to ensure a duplicate antianxiety medication had a clinical rationale for the continued use of the medication for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for unnecessary medication. (Resident C) Finding includes: During an interview, on 1/18/24 at 12:22 p.m., an anonymous family member indicated, on 1/7/24 after 12:00 p.m., Resident C was scared, acting differently, and was not able to form words. The resident was able to talk just fine a day later and could not remember the previous day. The staff were aware of the resident not being able to form words and acting differently than usual when the family talked to the staff on 1/7/24 and on 1/8/24. The record for Resident C was reviewed on 1/18/24 at 11:35 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, malignant neoplasm of unspecified bronchus or lung, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, anxiety disorder, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to complete a new Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) for a resident who was prescribed an antipsychotic medication for 1 of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR. (Resident 42) Finding includes: The record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 1/23/23 at 3:52 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbances, Alzheimer's disease with late onset and major depressive disorder. A PASARR Level I screen, dated 5/9/22, indicated the resident's mental health condition was anxiety. The resident had a diagnosis of dementia and had not received any mental health services in the past. The medication used for the anxiety was Ativan (a benzodiazepine used to treat anxiety). The Level I screen indicated there was no evidence of a serious behavioral health condition and if changes occurred or new information refuted the findings, a new screen must be submitted. A physician's order, dated 11/7/22, indicated to give Zyprexa Zydis (an antipsychotic in orally disintegrating tablets) 7.5 mg…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess for edema and notify the physician of a significant weight gain for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for quality of care. (Resident 155) Finding includes: During a wound care observation, with RN 3 on 1/24/23 at 3:11 p.m., Resident 155's legs were elevated on a pillow and appeared swollen. RN 3 indicated the resident had edema off and on in the past. The record for Resident 155 was reviewed on 1/20/23 at 3:16 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, dementia unspecified severity, depressive disorder, and hypertension. A physician's order, dated 1/4/23, indicated the resident was to be weighed every Monday between 6:00 a.m., and 10:00 a.m. A care plan, dated 1/11/23, indicated the resident was at risk for malnutrition due to inadequate nutrients. The interventions included, but were not limited to, assist with meals, and obtain weights as ordered. The resident had the following weights: a. On 1/4/23, the weight was 163.8 pounds. b. On 1/9/23, the weight was 168.0 pounds. c. On 1/16/23, the weight was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the consultant pharmacist made recommendations for irregularities in diagnoses and medications prescribed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. (Resident 42) Finding includes: The record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 1/23/22 at 3:52 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, restlessness and agitation, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and anxiety disorder. A physician's order, dated 11/7/22 through 11/29/22, indicated to give lithium carbonate (used to treat bipolar disorder) 300 mg (milligram) once a day for unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. A physician's order, dated 11/29/22 through 12/2/22, indicated to give lithium carbonate 300 mg once a day on Sundays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Fridays, and Saturdays for unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance. A physician's order, dated 11/8/22, indicated to give Zyprexa (an antipsychotic not orally…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-01-26 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order for antibiotics was followed for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident 19) Finding includes: The record for Resident 19 was reviewed on 1/23/23 at 10:37 a.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, Alzheimer's disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and Parkinson's disease. An emergency department note, dated 10/26/22, indicated the resident had redness and swelling to the right lower leg. The assessment/plan indicated cephalexin (an antibiotic) 500 mg (milligram) every 12 hours for 20 doses and doxycycline (an antibiotic) 100 mg twice daily for 20 doses. A physician's order, dated 10/27/22 through 11/5/22, indicated to give cephalexin 500 mg every 12 hours for cellulitis. A physician's order, dated 10/27/22 through 11/5/22, indicated to give doxycycline 100 mg twice daily for cellulitis. A physician's clinic note, dated 10/27/22, indicated the resident was seen in the nursing home by the physician. The resident was seen in the emergency room for cellulitis. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-01-26 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with dementia had an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic medication and a mood stabilizing medication and to ensure recommendations for parameters of laboratory levels were followed for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. (Resident 42) Finding includes: The record for Resident 42 was reviewed on 1/23/22 at 3:52 p.m. Diagnoses included, but were not limited to, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, Alzheimer's disease with late onset, restlessness and agitation, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease stage 3, and anxiety disorder. A discharge summary from the inpatient psychiatric facility, dated 11/7/22, indicated the resident was admitted to the psychiatric facility, on 10/23/22, due to increased behaviors of physical aggression over a 72-hour time period. The resident was prescribed Zyprexa for dementia with behaviors and lithium for dementia with behaviors. The goal was to keep the lithium level less than 0.6 due to the resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES — 123 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 5 of 54.2+0.8 vs chain
Health inspection 4 of 53.5+0.5 vs chain
Staffing 4 of 53.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.8+0.2 vs chain
The other 122 homes this chain runs (chain average 4.2★, per CMS)
1 of 5Heritage TheFindlay, OH 1 of 5The Oaks Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterZanesville, OH 2 of 5Homewood Health CampusLebanon, IN 2 of 5Violet Springs Health CampusPickerington, OH 2 of 5Woodmont Health CampusBoonville, IN 3 of 5Cobblestone Crossings Health CampusTerre Haute, IN 3 of 5Creasy Springs Health CampusLafayette, IN 3 of 5Cumberland Pointe Health CampusWest Lafayette, IN 3 of 5Forest Park Health CampusRichmond, IN 3 of 5Franciscan Health Care CenterLouisville, KY 3 of 5Greenleaf Health CampusElkhart, IN 3 of 5River Terrace Health CampusMadison, IN 3 of 5Scenic Hills At The MonasteryFerdinand, IN 3 of 5Smiths Mill Health CampusNew Albany, OH 3 of 5Springhurst Health CampusGreenfield, IN 3 of 5Springs Of Richmond, TheRichmond, IN 3 of 5St Mary Healthcare CenterLafayette, IN 3 of 5Stonegate Health CampusLapeer, MI 3 of 5Sun Prairie Senior LivingSun Prairie, WI 3 of 5Taylor Springs Health CampusGahanna, OH 3 of 5The Willows at Fritz FarmLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HamburgLexington, KY 3 of 5The Willows at HarrodsburgHarrodsburg, KY 3 of 5The Willows at SpringhurstLouisville, KY 3 of 5Villages At Oak Ridge, TheWashington, IN 3 of 5Waunakee Valley Senior LivingWaunakee, WI 3 of 5Wellbrooke Of CarmelCarmel, IN 4 of 5Arlington Place Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Ashford Place Health CampusShelbyville, IN 4 of 5Aspen Place Health CampusGreensburg, IN 4 of 5Avalon Springs Health CampusValparaiso, IN 4 of 5Bethany Pointe Health CampusAnderson, IN 4 of 5Blair Ridge Health CampusPeru, IN 4 of 5Bridgepointe Health CampusVincennes, IN 4 of 5Cedar Creek Health CampusLowell, IN 4 of 5Clearvista Lake Health CampusIndianapolis, IN 4 of 5Forest Springs Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Glen Oaks Health CampusNew Castle, IN 4 of 5Glen Ridge Health CampusLouisville, KY 4 of 5Meadows Of Delphos TheDelphos, OH

Showing 40 of 122; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WITHAM MEMORIAL HOSPITALOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 05/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE HOLDINGS INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2015
KEYBANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2007
BAYSTON, BRETTIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
BRAND, JOHNIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2015
CASTETTER, ANDREAIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2023
HAWKINS, CLAUDEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/09/2013
HORNBECKER, MICHAELIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 01/01/2024
REAGAN, JULIEIndividualCORPORATE DIRECTORsince 09/25/2024
BARDOCZI, STEPHENIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 09/03/2013
BRAVERMAN, KELLYIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 12/01/2021
SELLERS, DANIELIndividualCORPORATE OFFICERsince 06/20/2024
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE OF LOGANSPORT LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 05/01/2015
MATHEW, PEKKAKUZHIYILIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
SNAY, KIMBERLYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2025
BARNEY, LEIGHIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/01/2015
DAVIS, DAVIDIndividualLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/31/2019
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT HOLDINGS LPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
AMERICAN HEALTHCARE REIT INCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
CONTINENTAL MERGER SUB LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2021
GAHC3 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
GAHC4 TRILOGY JV LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 10/01/2018
PARAGON OUTPATIENT REHABILITATION SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTH SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY HEALTHCARE MASTER TENANT II, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/27/2025
TRILOGY INVESTORS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/11/2025
TRILOGY PROPCO FINANCE LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY PROPERTY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE INVESTMENT TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REAL ESTATE OF LOGANSPORT, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015
TRILOGY REIT HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 32 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

19 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$10.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+12.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense16% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 30%Medicare 17%Other / private 53%

This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$311per resident / day
operating cost
$9,453per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$356per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in IN

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Indiana Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Indiana
$8,943/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$10,326/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,639/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 155724. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-03, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next