Brockton Post Acute Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 328 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 55.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 143 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.23 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 29% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 51% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 169 beds and averages 156.9 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 12 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.47 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.10 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.11 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.65 to 0.39 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 38% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure nursing provided care and services that met professional standards of practice, when upon admission his/her medications were not reconciled accurately, and medications were administered at doses and intervals that were not consistent with Physicians Orders.Findings include:Review of the Facility Policy titled Reconciliation of Medication on Admission, dated as last revised 07/2017, indicated that the purpose of medication reconciliation is to ensure medication safety by accurately accounting for the resident's medications, routes and dosages upon admission or readmission to the Facility.The Policy indicated that all prescription medications, including those taken only as needed are obtained from all sources prior to reconciliation as well as dose, route, frequency and last doses taken.Resident #1 was admitted with Hospice Services from the community to the Facility in April 2025 for a five (5) day respite stay, diagnoses include Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
  Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure appropriate treatment and services were provided to maintain or improve his or her ability to carry out the activities of daily living and attain or maintain the highest practical physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for two Residents (#37 and #38 out of a sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #37 with a diagnosis of Aphasia (communication disorder that affects speech, writing and language understanding) was assessed for communication 2. For Resident #12 to ensure Speech Therapy (SLP) evaluation was completed timely after admission and to ensure Physical Therapy (PT) visits were completed per physician order/plan of care. Review of the facility policy titled Scheduling of Therapy Services dated as last revised July 2013 indicated but was not limited to the following: -Therapy Services shall be scheduled in accordance with the residents treatment plan. -A listing of residents…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide residents with adequate supervision and effective interventions to prevent avoidable accidents. Specifically, the facility failed to develop and consistently implement effective interventions to prevent four unwitnessed falls, resulting in three injuries on 11/2/24, 11/30/24 and 1/26/25, for one Resident (#16), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policies titled Fall and Fall Risk Managing last revised March 2018, indicated but was not limited to the following: Based on previous evaluations and current data, the staff will identify interventions related to the resident specific risks and causes to try to prevent the resident from falling -The staff, with the input of the attending physician, will implement a resident-centered fall prevention plan to reduce the specific risk factor(s) of falls for each resident at risk or with a history of falls. -If falling recurs despite initial interventions, staff will implement additional or different interventions…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a person-centered plan of care which included trauma informed approaches and identified triggers to avoid potential re-traumatization for one Residents (#29) with a history of trauma, out of a total sample of 27 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Trauma Informed Care and Culturally Competent Care dated as last revised 8/2022 indicated but was not limited to the following: -Trauma results from an event, series of events, or set of circumstances that is experiences by an individual as physically or emotionally harmful or life threatening and that has lasting adverse effects on the individual's functioning and mental, physical, social, emotional, or spiritual well-being. -Trauma-informed care is an approach to delivering care that involves understanding, recognizing, and responding to the effects of trauma. A trauma-informed approach to cate delivery recognizes the widespread impact and signs and symptoms of trauma…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) were implemented to ensure that emergency Kits were replaced timely. Five out of five drawers of Supper Kit #51001 were impacted and 1of 1 Cubex Kit was also impacted. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that emergency medication kits (E-Kits) were re-ordered and replaced timely by the Pharmacy after being opened. Findings Include: Review of the facility Pharmacy policy titled Emergency Medication dated April 2025, indicated but was not limited to the following: - The facility shall maintain a supply of medications typically used in emergencies - The pharmaceutical services/quality assurance and performance improvement committee, with the input of the consultant pharmacist, director of nursing services, and medical director, shall approve the contents of the emergency medication kit, and the dispensing pharmacy will stock it. - The emergency medication…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and test tray results, the facility failed to provide food to residents that was served at appetizing temperatures for one of two test trays. Findings include: On 4/14/25 at 2:20 P.M., the Resident Council meeting was conducted with 17 residents in attendance. During the meeting the residents collectively expressed the kitchen continues to be problematic, with specific complaints that the food is cold, especially eggs in the morning and the plates are cold not heated. On 4/16/25 at 7:55 A.M., the surveyor observed breakfast tray line service and made the following observations: -The surveyor felt the dishes in the plate warmer to be slightly warm, not hot. -Food Service Manager measured the temperature at the bottom of the plates to be 130 degrees Fahrenheit (F). He then turned up the temperature of the plate warming unit. During an interview on 4/11/25 at 8:00 A.M., the [NAME] #1 said she turned on the plate warmer when she first came in in the morning. She said the plates were not hot. On 4/16/25 at 7:59 A.M., the surveyor requested a test tray,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolated
  Allow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled resident (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure that the resident and/or his/her family member or legal representative participated in the development and implementation of their person-center care plans, which included conducting and inviting the resident and/or their legal representative to an interdisciplinary care plan meeting following the completion of any Comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment, including the Admission, Quarterly, and Annual MDS. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Care Plans, dated as last revised 02/2022, indicated that each resident in the facility shall be involved in the development and review of his/her plan of care along with his/her family member. The Policy further indicated that the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) conferences shall be held for each resident at 90-day intervals and the IDT shall; -Evaluate the resident's progress toward meeting the goals outlined in the care plan; -Revise the plan of care, and services; -Collaborate with the resident and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-08-08 · tag F0559 — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who was alert, oriented and his/her own decision maker, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 and/or his/her Representative were provided with a written explanation of the need to change his/her room, when on 06/26/24 Resident #1's was moved to a new room despite his/her wishes to remain in his/her original room. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy tilted, Room Change, dated as last revised 10/2022, indicated that a room change or change in roommate shall be made when the resident or their representative requests the change or the facility deems it necessary. The Policy further indicated the following; -When a resident room change is occurring, the resident being moved or their representative, will be informed of the room change; and -The notice of change in a room or roommate assignment will be both verbal and in writing and will include the reason(s) for the change. Resident #1 was admitted to the facility in April 2024, diagnoses included both lower extremity necrotizing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1) who had been admitted with three pressure injuries, the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate medical/clinical records including but not limited to documentation related to the completion and accuracy of skin assessments. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled, Charting and Documentation, dated as last revised 01/2023, indicated that all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's condition medical, physical, functional or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical records. The Policy indicated that the medical record should facilitate communication between the interdisciplinary team regarding the resident's condition and response to care. Review of the Facility Policy titled, admission Assessment, dated 10/2022, indicated the purpose of the admission procedure is to gather information about the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-21 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure, for four Residents (#336, #110, #25, and #100), out of a total sample of 24 residents, the right to personal privacy of his/her own physical body during medical treatment was maintained. Findings include: On 2/14/24 at 9:18 A.M., the surveyor observed a lab technician enter Resident #336's room with a rolling cart and begin to prepare supplies to draw blood. The surveyor observed the technician cleanse the Resident's right arm, apply a tourniquet, and draw blood from the Resident's arm. The Resident was in full view of his/her roommate and any passerby in the hallway. On 2/14/24 at 9:45 A.M., the surveyor observed a lab technician enter Resident #110's room with a rolling cart and begin to prepare supplies to draw blood. The surveyor observed the technician cleanse the Resident's arm, apply a tourniquet, and draw blood from the Resident's arm. The Resident was in full view of his/her roommate and any passerby in the hallway. On 2/14/24 at 9:49 A.M., the surveyor observed a lab technician enter Resident #25's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.8M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA