No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Mill Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

100 Amity Street, Fall River, MA 02721 · For profit - Corporation · 152 certified beds · (508) 675-2500 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (508) 675-2500 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0607) — cited Sep 2023Resident-funds citation (F0565)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)3 actual-harm citations
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
1010 S Main St · (508) 679-3296 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.5 mi
328 Rhode Island Ave · (508) 324-9490 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
333 Mariano Bishop Blvd · (508) 675-0391 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Main Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased13.5%16.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight8.9%5.1%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms58.0%15.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury2.8%3.4%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened17.6%15.4%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.1%19.5%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine97.6%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers1.5%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control29.6%21.2%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.4%21.4%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.7%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission18.7%25.7%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit16.9%11.9%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.051.881.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.051.501.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 206 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
72.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.13hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 72.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 84 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 35% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.4%CMS range 49.1–63.251.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.8%CMS range 9.5–16.310.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge72.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge66.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge71.4%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified96.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened2.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.8%CMS range 5.1–11.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.001.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
0.87
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.94
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.27
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.23
RN hoursweekends
43.2%
Total nursing turnover
41.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 152 beds and averages 142.1 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.27 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.94 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.42 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.55 to 0.23 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

5
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-28)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-07-17)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 30 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-03-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician was notified of changes for one Resident (#45) in order to alter the treatment, in a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to notify the physician of a recommendation to change the treatment for a wound on the right great toe. Findings include: Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in November 2017 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the medical record indicated a diabetic ulcer to the right great toe was identified in February 2023. Review of the Wound Evaluation and Management Summary from the consultant wound physician, dated 2/3/23, indicated Resident #45 had a diabetic wound of the right, medial, first toe, measuring 1.2 centimeters (cm) length by 0.4 cm width by 0.1 cm depth with dried fibrinous exudate (scab). The wound consultant made a recommendation to apply Bacitracin (topical antibiotic) to the wound twice daily for eight days and off-load (remove weight or redistribute weight to areas less prone to pressure) the wound to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOT CORRECTED Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#91), out of a total sample of 17 residents, received care and treatment to prevent and to promote healing of a pressure injury. Specifically, the facility failed to implement treatments as ordered, notify the physician, and reassess worsening Moisture-Associated Skin Damage (MASD-inflammation and erosion of the skin caused by prolonged exposure to various sources of moisture, including urine or stool) resulting in a delay in treatment and deterioration of the wound to an unstageable pressure area to the Resident's coccyx. Findings include: Review of the facility's policies titled Wound Ulcer, initiated 1/2023, and Wound Treatment Guidelines, last revised 1/2023, indicated the following: -A skin ulcer (wound) is defined as any open area of the skin regardless of origin. It may also include an area of discoloration that is not open. -The licensed nurse shall: -Document wounds/skin impairments in the electronic medical record including wound measurements, will reflect if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · G2023-03-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an environment free of accident hazards for one Resident (#53), out of a sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure an adverse medication event, which necessitated the Resident to be emergently transferred to the hospital for evaluation and resulted in psychosocial distress to the Resident, was investigated and reported according to facility policy. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Accidents and Incidents, last revised [DATE], included but was not limited to: -It is the policy of the facility to monitor and evaluate all occurrences of accidents or incidents or adverse events occurring on the facility's premises which is not consistent with the routine operation of the facility or care of a particular resident. These occurrences must be evaluated and investigated. Procedure: The following forms make up the Incident and Accident Packet for investigating and reporting: -Accident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure monthly Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations made by the pharmacy consultant were addressed timely and maintained as part of the permanent medical record for two Residents (#16 and #5), out of a total sample of 27 residents.Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #16, to ensure the April 2025 and May 2025 consultant pharmacist recommendations were maintained as part of the permanent medical record and acted upon timely to assess the need for Meclizine (an anticholinergic medication used to treat nausea, vomiting and dizziness) and to obtain an A1c (blood test that measures an average blood sugar level over a period of two to three months); and2. For Resident #5, to ensure the April 2025, May 2025, and July 2025 consultant pharmacist recommendations were maintained as part of the permanent medical records and acted upon timely to sequence multiple as needed pain medications and to obtain labs related to specific medication use.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacy…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for food safety and sanitation to prevent the potential spread of foodborne illness to residents who are at high risk. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the main kitchen walk-in refrigerator was maintained in a sanitary and safe condition. Findings include:1. Review of the 2022 Food Code by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: 3-305.11 (A) Except as specified in paragraphs (B) and (C) of this section, food shall be protected from contamination by storing the food (1) in a clean, dry location. 4-602.11 (D) Equipment is used for storage of packaged or unpackaged food such as a reach-in refrigerator and the equipment is cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. 4-602.13 Nonfood-contact surfaces of equipment shall be cleaned at a frequency necessary to preclude accumulation of soil residues. Review of the facility's policy titled Sanitization, revised November 2022, indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided care in accordance with professional standards of practice for two Residents (#13 and #86), out of a total sample of 27 residents. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #13, to ensure physician's orders were complete for the management of a continuous glucose monitoring sensor and included orders to remove and change the device every 14 days; and2. For Resident #86, to complete weekly skin check documentation per physician's orders.Findings include:1. Review of the facility's policy titled Freestyle Libre 2 Flash Glucose Monitoring System, June 2023, indicated but was not limited to: -Always obtain physician’s orders for the use of fingerstick blood glucose testing via a facility approved blood glucose meter to guide treatment decisions. -Review the resident’s orders to evaluate special needs of the resident. -Review and follow manufacturer's guidelines for use. Review of [NAME] Freestyle Libre…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#46), out of 27 sampled residents, and one Resident (#159), out of three closed records, received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices to achieve their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Specifically, the facility failed:1. For Resident #46, to ensure the Wound Physician's recommendations were addressed and implemented timely for a skin tear; and2. For Resident #159, to: a. Accurately transcribe the physician's order to send Resident #159 to the emergency room for evaluation, resulting in a minimum of a nine-hour delay (6/30/25 5:00 P.M. to 7/1/25 2:00 A.M.) in transferring the Resident to the hospital, and b. Report abnormal urinalysis results to the Physician in a timely manner. Findings include:1. Review of the facility's policy titled Consultant Physician Services, dated as adopted 2/2023,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#46), out of a total sample of 27 residents, received the necessary care and treatment to prevent and promote healing of pressure injuries. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure Wound Physician recommendations were addressed and implemented timely. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pressure Ulcer /Skin Breakdown - Clinical Protocol, dated as last revised 3/2014, indicated but was not limited to the following:-The physician will authorize pertinent orders related to wound treatments.-The physician will help identify medical interventions related to wound management. Review of the facility's policy titled Consultant Physician Services, dated as adopted 2/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following:-Consultant physician services are available to the residents as ordered by their attending physician or physician designee.-After completion of the consult, the consultant physician will provide the facility with a consultation report which shall include any orders,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews and policy review, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions to promote safe food handling. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure hair was restrained when preparing food; and 2. Ensure staff practiced proper hand hygiene to prevent cross contamination (transfer of pathogens from one surface to another). In addition, to ensure the use of gloves was limited to a single use task; and 3. Ensure staff monitored cooked food temperatures being held for service to residents. Findings include: 1. Review of facility's policy titled Hair Restraints, dated 2020, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Hair Restraints, hats, and/or beard guards shall be used to prevent hair from contacting exposed food. Any facial hair that is longer than the eyebrow shall require coverage with a beard guard in the production and dishwashing areas. During an initial tour of the main kitchen on 7/11/24 at 7:16 A.M., the surveyor observed: -Dietary staff #2 did not have hair restrained while preparing breakfast. -Dietary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on a resident group meeting, staff interviews, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievances and concerns from Resident Council were acted upon and promptly resolved from 12/6/23 through 7/8/24 as required. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Resident Council, dated as last revised 1/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Concerns that are raised at the meeting must be recorded in minutes and followed with a concern/response form filled out by the designated staff representative and addressed to the corresponding Department Head to provide a resolution. All supporting documentation (i.e., in-services, staff education, clinical notes) must be attached. Concern/response forms must be completed within 7 days of being issued. Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances, dated as last revised 10/2023, indicated but was not limited to the following: -The Grievance Officer coordinates adequate and timely handling of grievances/complaints and ensures the grievances/complaints and resolutions are maintained and reviewed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for two Residents (#343 and #104), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #343, to monitor the Resident's left upper extremity midline catheter insertion site for signs/symptoms of infection and/or infiltration every shift in accordance with the physician's order; and 2. For Resident #104, to ensure the physician conducted an accurate assessment of the Resident upon admission, per accepted standards of clinical practice, resulting in an inaccurate diagnosis of schizophrenia to be added to the Resident's list of active diagnoses. Findings include: 1. Review of the Massachusetts Board of Registration in Nursing Advisory Ruling on Nursing Practice, Advisory Ruling Number 9324, dated as revised July 10, 2002, indicated: -Nurse's Responsibility and Accountability: Licensed nurses accept, verify, transcribe, and implement orders from duly authorized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff stored all drugs and biologicals used in the facility in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure the treatment cart on Cookside Unit was locked when not in direct supervision of the licensed nurse; and 2. Ensure safe storage of medications and biologicals according to current standards of practice in 2 of 3 observed medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures, dated as last revised December 2019, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Security: All medication storage areas (carts, medication rooms, central supply) are locked at all times unless in use and under the direct supervision of the medication nurse/aide. -Check expiration date on package/container before administering any medication. When opening a multi-dose container, place the date on the container. Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Storage, dated as last revised…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-07-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and menu review, the facility failed to ensure that menus posted were followed. Findings include: Review of the breakfast menu for 7/11/24 indicated that residents should have received French toast casserole, sausage, choice of hot or cold cereal. On 7/11/24 at 7:30 A.M., the surveyor observed Dietary Staff #2 preparing breakfast trays with French toast instead of a French toast casserole. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 7 A.M., Dietary Staff #2 said this is what is for breakfast and was unaware of a French toast casserole being on the menu. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 11:13 A.M., Resident #94 said they are unaware if the food served differs from the menu until a meal is served. He/She said the kitchen beats to its own drum, and he/she can't depend on the menu for accuracy. He/She said they had cookies for dinner last night because he/she didn't like the meal and a request for a tuna sandwich took over an hour. Review of the lunch menu for 7/15/24 indicated that residents should have received beef and broccoli stir fry, steamed rice,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 30 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, test tray results, and interview, the facility failed to ensure staff served food that is palatable and at an appetizing temperature for 2 out of 2 test trays conducted. Findings include: During initial resident screening on 7/11/24, the residents expressed the following concerns about the food served at the facility: -Food temperatures are cold for foods that are supposed to be hot. -The milk is warm. -The food served lacks palatability. -The bread is soggy. -There are missing items from tray and the meal tray is not reflective of meal ticket. On 7/15/24 at 10:30 A.M., the residents at the Resident Group Meeting expressed concern regarding the palatability of the food served at the facility. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 11:13 A.M., Resident #94 said the food is either tasteless or too salty. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 3:35 P.M., Resident Representative #1 said the food is awful, the meat is dry, and the vegetables have no flavor. Test Tray #1: On 7/12/24 at 12:00 P.M., the surveyor requested a lunch tray be sent to the Arborside Unit second meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that for one Resident (#43), out of a total sample of 26 residents, the nurse provided the Resident privacy while administering medication, specifically an insulin injection. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Specific Medication Administration Procedures, undated, included but was not limited to the following: Policy To administer medications in a safe and effective manner. B. Privacy: 1) Provide privacy for resident during administration of medications. Review of Resident #43's current Physician's Orders indicated: -Tresiba (antihypoglycemic medication; insulin), 100 units/milliliter, inject 15 units subcutaneously once daily. On 7/16/24 at 4:10 P.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #8 at the medication cart in the hallway drawing up the ordered dose of Tresiba in an insulin syringe. The surveyor heard Nurse #8 call Resident #43, who was standing in the hallway waiting for the medication to be administered, and then ask the Resident where he/she wanted the medication injected. With…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activity of daily living (ADL) care was provided to maintain good personal grooming for one Resident (#115), in a total sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure nail care was performed for Resident #115. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled ADL - Nail Care, undated, indicated the following: -the purposes of this procedure are to clean the nail bed, to keep nails trimmed, and to prevent infections -nail care includes daily cleaning and regular trimming -trimmed and smooth nails prevent the resident from accidentally scratching and injuring his/her skin Resident #115 was admitted to the facility in August 2023. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/23/24, indicated the Resident was dependent on one staff person for personal hygiene and that Resident #115 scored a 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. Review of the Care Plans indicated Resident #115 was at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0685 — isolated
    Assist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to arrange for an audiology appointment for one Resident (#115), out of 26 sampled residents, to address the Resident's hearing loss. Findings include: Resident #115 was admitted to the facility in August 2023. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 5/23/24, indicated Resident #115 scored 13 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating the Resident was cognitively intact. During an interview on 7/11/24 at 8:20 A.M., Resident #115 said he/she was unable to hear the surveyor and asked the surveyor to speak louder. The Resident said he/she did not have hearing aids but hoped to be getting them soon. On 7/17/24 at 7:47 A.M., the surveyor observed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #2 assisting Resident #115 to get set up for breakfast. The surveyor observed Resident #115 tell CNA #2 that he/she could not hear the CNA. Review of the Social Work progress notes, dated 3/13/24, indicated Resident #115 requested an appointment for a hearing evaluation and reported more difficulty…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure the Physician documented a clinical rationale for disagreeing with the consultant pharmacist's identified and reported irregularity (order for an antipsychotic medication without supporting diagnosis for usage) for one Resident (#40), out of a total sample of 26 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacy Consultant Med Review, last reviewed January 2023, included but was not limited to: The Pharmacy Consultant provides: -Consultation of all aspects of the provisions of pharmacy services in the facility -Reviews each medication regime of all residents in the facility once per month to examine: -Supporting Diagnosis -Gradual dose reductions attempted Resident #40 was admitted to the facility in June 2024 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive and unspecified dementia, unspecified severity, without behavioral disturbance, psychotic disturbance, mood disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 7/2/24, indicated Resident #40 had moderate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure one Resident (#40), out of a total sample of 26 residents, was free from unnecessary psychotropic medication. Specifically, for Resident #40, the facility failed to ensure an antipsychotic was given to treat a specific condition. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antipsychotic Medication Use, last revised October 2022, included but was not limited to: -Residents will only receive antipsychotic medications when necessary to treat specific conditions for which they are indicated and effective. -Diagnosis of a specific condition for which antipsychotic medications are necessary to treat will be based on a comprehensive assessment of the resident. Review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacy Consultant Med Review, last reviewed January 2023, included but was not limited to: The Pharmacy Consultant provides: -Consultation of all aspects of the provisions of pharmacy services in the facility -Reviews each medication regime of all residents in the facility once per month to examine: -Supporting…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-07-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records in accordance with accepted professional standards for two Residents (#99 and #115), in a sample of 26 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the electronic medical record orders accurately reflected the advanced directives indicated on the Massachusetts Medical Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (MOLST) for Resident #99 and Resident #115. Findings include: 1. Resident #99 was admitted to the facility in September 2022. Review of the medical record indicated the designated Health Care Proxy for Resident #99 signed a new MOLST changing the code status from a Full Code (attempt resuscitation) to a Do Not Resuscitate, Do Not Intubate on 10/29/23. Review of the electronic medical record on 7/12/24, including physician orders and a section designated Code Status indicated Resident #99 was a full code (resuscitation would be attempted). The electronic medical record did not reflect the accurate code status of Do Not Resuscitate from the MOLST signed on 10/29/23. During an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-11 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based records reviewed and interviews, for one of four sampled staff members personnel files (Nurse #1), the Facility failed to ensure they consistently implemented measures related to abuse prevention and hiring practices, when training on the Facility Abuse Policy was not conducted on hire at orientation for Nurse #1, in accordance with the Facility Policy. Findings include: Review of the Facility Policy titled Abuse, dated as most recently revised 10/23/22, indicated that Facility personnel will be trained on hire at orientation on definitions of abuse, identification of abuse, prevention of abuse and obligation to report abuse. Review of Nurse #1's Personnel File, maintained by a staffing agency and provided to the Surveyor by the Facility Director of Nursing, indicated there was no documentation to support that the Facility or the staffing agency trained Nurse #1 on definitions of abuse, identification of abuse, prevention of abuse and obligation to report abuse on hire at orientation. During an interview on 9/11/23 at 1:00 P.M., the Director of Nursing said that there was no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to store, distribute, and serve food under sanitary conditions to promote safe food handling. Findings include: During an initial tour of the main kitchen on 2/26/23 at 8:15 A.M., the surveyor observed: --microwave oven under the food preparation counter had multiple brown, yellow, and orange splatters on all surfaces -industrial mixer had white, pink, and brown dried substances stuck onto the attachment hub During an interview on 2/26/23 at 8:20 A.M., [NAME] #1 said that dietary service department has had low staffing for a while and cleaning has not been done regularly. She said there is no master cleaning list or daily cleaning assignments. On 2/27/23 at 8:08 A.M., the surveyor reviewed the Arborside Unit nourishment kitchen and observed the following: -microwave oven had multiple dried food splatters (yellow, orange, and red) on all surfaces -freezer with thick ice stained with a brown substance built up along the sides and bottom of the freezer On 2/27/23 at 8:21 A.M., the surveyor reviewed the Cookside Unit nourishment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-02 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — widespread
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was administered in a manner that enabled it to use resources effectively to attain the highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident. Specifically, the corporate operations for contracts failed to re-evaluate the use of the preferred vendors of staffing agencies. Findings include: During the recertification survey conducted from 2/26/23 through 3/2/23 the surveyor interviewed families and residents who had concerns with insufficient staffing. In addition, the surveyors observed long call light wait times. During an interview on 3/1/23 at 3:23 P.M., the Director of Nurses said the management staff had been personally filling in as many open positions for nurses or Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) as they could. She said the facility was having difficulty obtaining staff from the contracted staffing agencies. She said there was an issue with payment to the staffing agencies and did not have any additional information. During an interview on 3/1/23 at 3:28 P.M., Scheduler #1…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-02 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and document review, the Medical Director failed to attend the last two quarterly Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings as required. Findings include: During an interview on 3/02/23 at 9:56 A.M. , the Medical Director said that he has not attended a QAPI meeting for approximately six months and has not received any notification as to when the meetings were scheduled. Review of the Sign-In Sheets for the quarterly QAPI meetings in October 2022 and January 2023 indicated the Medical Director had not been present at the meeting as evidenced by his missing signature. During an interview on 3/02/23 at 3:03 P.M., the Administrator said he had not notified the Medical Director of the schedule for the QAPI meetings.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-02 · tag F0886 — failed to test for COVID-19 as required — widespread
    Perform COVID19 testing on residents and staff.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, policy review, and review of staff and resident testing logs, and resident records, the facility failed to ensure outbreak testing for COVID-19 was implemented for staff and residents following as per facility policy. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff COVID-19 weekly testing was accurately documented and completed for all staff until the facility went 14 days without a new case, and 2. Ensure 4 out of 6 residents reviewed were tested per the recommendations of Department of Public Health (DPH) Rapid response team and documented in medical record during outbreak testing. Findings include: Review of the infection control line listing for staff and residents indicated a staff personnel tested positive for COVID-19 on 12/18/22, and the facility remains in outbreak with the last positive staff case on 2/22/23. Review of the facility's policy titled Outbreak Testing Infection Control, dated 10/17/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: -It is the policy of this facility to follow all updated regulatory guidance from Centers…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on resident and staff interviews, policy review, and document review, the facility failed to ensure grievances and concerns from the Resident Council were acted upon timely and resolved to the residents' satisfaction. Findings include: Review of the facility's policies titled Resident/Family Council, last reviewed 2/18/22, and Grievance Policy, last revised 1/28/22, included but was not limited to: -Residents may voice grievances to the Resident Services Coordinator, Performance Improvement Coordinator, Social Service designee, or Charge Nurses. The management team shall investigate any grievance; -Staff shall be informed regarding decisions reached in the Resident and/or Family Visitor Council; -It is the policy of this facility to follow all regulatory guidance and support that each resident has the right to voice grievances and complaints and that resolution will be actively pursued in a reasonable amount of time; -When a resident, representative, or other person linked to a resident has a grievance or complaint a staff member should encourage that person to file a written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on policy review, interview, document review, and record review, the facility failed to implement the facility's grievance policy for 9 of 9 grievances reviewed and for two Residents (#6 and #85), from a sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For 5 of 9 grievances reviewed, notify the Administrator as required if a grievance/complaint involves a potential violation of a resident right or allegation of neglect or abuse and for 9 of 9 grievances reviewed, investigate and resolve grievances according to facility policy; 2. For Resident #6, follow up on a grievance of a broken item for over five months; and 3. For Resident #85, to research and follow up on a grievance of being left on a bed pan for over an hour. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Grievances, revised September 2020, indicated the following: -It is the policy of this facility to follow all regulatory guidance and support that each resident has the right to voice grievances and complaints and that resolution will be actively pursued in a reasonable amount of time; -If…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — pattern
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    4. Resident #43 was admitted to the facility in February 2022 with diagnoses including insulin dependent diabetes mellitus. Review of the February 2023 Physician's Orders indicated the following: -Insulin Lispro (short acting)- Sliding scale: If Blood Sugar is: 150-199 = (1 Unit); 200-249 = (2 Units); 250-299 = (3 units); 300-349 = (4 units); 350-399 = (6 units); 400--449= (8 Units); >450 (10 Units) and call physician Before meals and at Bedtime (6:30 A.M., 11:30 A.M., 4:30 P.M., and 8:00 P.M.). -Insulin Glargine (long acting insulin) solution 100 unit/milliliter (ml) amt.-16 units, subcutaneous, once a day at 6:00 A.M. Record review indicated that the Resident was being administered a dose of insulin every day at 6:00 A.M. and could potentially be receiving doses in addition to the daily insulin depending on the blood sugar results. Review of the comprehensive care plans failed to indicate that a care plan had been developed related to the Resident's diagnosis of diabetes/insulin use that addressed potential problems, goals, and interventions. 5. Resident #90 was admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff provided care and services according to accepted standards of clinical practice for seven Residents (#101, #10, #43, #90, #63, #45, and #91), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #101, to ensure laboratory work was completed, as ordered by the physician; 2. For Resident #10, to: a. obtain a physician's order with instructions/ranges for physician notification of a low or a high capillary blood glucose (CBG), and b. apply TED stockings (elastic stockings) as ordered and accurately document as administered; 3. For Resident #43, to: a. have a physician's order to perform CBG's/Finger Stick Blood Sugars (FSBS) to correlate with the administration of the sliding scale insulin, b. obtain a physician's order with instructions/ranges for physician notification of a low or a high CBG, along with protocols/interventions in place for hypoglycemia or hyperglycemia,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-02 · tag F0711 — pattern
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the Physician evaluated the residents' conditions and total program of care for four Residents (#45, #53, #91 and #63), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the physician failed to review the following total programs of care: 1. For Resident #45, for the development of a diabetic wound; 2. For Resident #53, for the re-admission status of Resident #53 after emergency room evaluation following an adverse medication event; 3. For Resident #91, for the re-admission status of Resident #91with dehydration and an indwelling Foley catheter (flexible tube inserted through the urethra and into the bladder to drain urine); and 4. For Resident #63, for the wound of the left heel. Findings include: 1. Resident #45 was admitted to the facility in November 2017 with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the medical record indicated a diabetic ulcer to the right great toe developed in February 2023. Review of a Nursing Progress Note, dated 2/2/23, indicated a covering Physician was notified of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-02 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and schedule review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient staff available to provide nursing services and care required to meet the residents' needs resulting in long wait times for call light response. Findings include: Review of the Facility Assessment, dated as last updated 11/1/22, indicated: All staffing is primarily based on the daily census on each unit. Each Resident's preference for schedule, waking times, naps, bathing, bedtime, etc., is reflected in their individual plan of care. Our current staffing patterns allow for these needs to be met on an individual basis. Staffing patterns are increased based on acuity and behavior, example being if a Resident needs 1:1 attention for a period of time, or need for 2 staff members to handle a transfer, such as with a Resident that requires a Hoyer lift (a device utilized to physically lift someone out of bed requiring 2 people). Review of the facility's policy titled Call Bell Policy, revised on 1/28/22, indicated it was the expectation that call lights would be answered promptly. Upon…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to have the attending physician review and sign the identified pharmacological recommendations so that action could be taken to address them for one Resident (#38), in a sample of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Pharmacy Consultant Med Review, dated as revised in January 2023, indicated: -the pharmacy consultant will document his/her findings and recommendations on the monthly drug/regimen review report -the unit manager/designee will make sure all recommendations are acted upon, all recommendations are reported to the physicians, there is documentation in the chart that notification and follow-up occurred, notify the resident's physician of recommendations and document in the resident's chart that this was done, and remind the physician to sign the resident's consultant report. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in January 2016 with diagnoses of depression and anxiety. Review of the medical record for Resident #38 indicated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-02 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based in record review, policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that the resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary drugs without adequate monitoring in place for six Residents (#45, #91 #10, #34, #43 and #90) from a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that: 1. Residents #45, #91, #10, and #34 had been monitored for signs/symptoms of adverse consequences (i.e., side effects) and the effectiveness of an anti-coagulant; and 2. Residents #43 and #90 had been monitored for signs/symptoms of adverse consequences (i.e., side effects) and the effectiveness of an anti-diabetic agent. Findings include: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled Anticoagulant Therapy, last revised 1/2022, included but was not limited to: -The staff and physician will identify and address potential complications in individuals receiving anticoagulation; for example, someone with a fall risk, a history of gastrointestinal bleeding, or poorly controlled hypertension; -The staff and physician will monitor for possible complications in individuals who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, policy review, and record review, the facility failed to ensure four Residents (#53, #91, #38, and #86) were free from unnecessary psychotropic medications, in a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #53, resident specific, targeted behaviors were identified and monitored for the use of the psychotropic medications Sertraline (antidepressant) and Quetiapine (antipsychotic); 2. For Resident #91: a. resident specific, targeted behaviors were identified and monitored for the use of the psychotropic medications Cymbalta (antidepressant) and Zyprexa (antipsychotic), and b. an as needed (PRN) psychotropic medication included a duration for use and was reviewed by the physician with a documented rationale for continued use; 3. For Resident #38, a psychotropic medication ordered PRN included a duration for use and was reviewed by the physician with a documented rationale for continued use; and 4. For Resident #86, the initial order for psychotropic medication was limited to 14 days, a written rationale to extend as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, test tray results, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that staff served food that is palatable and at an appetizing temperature on 2 out of 3 units, for 2 out of 2 test trays conducted. Findings include: Test Tray #1: On 2/27/23 at 12:04 P.M., Food Truck #2 left the main kitchen, and arrived on the Birchside Unit at 12:06 P.M. The surveyor observed that meal service began at 12:08 P.M. and the food truck door remained open while staff removed trays from the truck and distributed them to residents in the dining room and in their rooms. At 12:21 P.M., the surveyor, Staff #2, and Staff #4, conducted a test tray with the last tray that was removed from the food truck, and the results in degrees Fahrenheit (F) were as follows: -milk 50 F and slightly cool to taste -spaghetti and meat sauce: 130 F tepid (lukewarm) to taste -tapioca pudding: 60 F warm to taste -green beans: 100 F cool and bland to taste -garlic toast: 90 F tepid to taste The food was not served at a palatable and appetizing temperature. During an interview on 2/27/23 at 12:10 P.M., Staff #2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide an appropriate seating device to support the Resident's right lower leg with a long leg brace for comfort and proper support for one Resident #308, out of a total sample size of 21 residents. Findings include: Resident #308 was admitted to the facility in February 2023 with a diagnosis of right total knee replacement, complicated by an injury to the patella tendon (kneecap tendon), requiring the Resident to wear a full leg hinged brace, locked in zero degrees of extension (prevents the knee from bending). During an interview on 2/26/23 at 9:10 A.M., Resident #308 said he/she was admitted Friday night and has not been seen by rehab and had to ask nursing for a walker to use the bathroom and a wheelchair to sit up out of bed. The surveyor observed the Resident sitting in a wheelchair, with the right leg unsupported, hanging off the wheelchair seat with the foot supported on the metal bar of the overbed tray table (the wheelchair did not have leg rests). Resident #308 said he/she needs a recliner or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure wound management was conducted for two Residents (#38 and #86), in a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed: 1. For Resident #38, to ensure wound recommendations, approved by the physician, were implemented; and 2. For Resident #86: a. to ensure skin evaluations were performed weekly per physician's orders, and staff documented and monitored the below knee surgical incision site for early signs of infection, b. to perform dressing changes to the right foot, per physician's orders, and c. to maintain the cleanliness of the stump shrinker (sock worn to reduce, prevent and control edema) being worn over the left below knee amputation that was currently being treated for an infection. Findings include: 1. Resident #38 was admitted to the facility in January 2016 and had a history of having a feeding tube. Review of the medical record indicated the feeding tube had previously been removed and the wound from the feeding tube site had re-opened. Review of the Physician's Orders on 3/1/23 included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide the necessary respiratory care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#2A), out of a total sample of 17 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Therapy (revised October 2022) indicated but was not limited to the following: The administration of supplemental oxygen is an essential element of appropriate management for a wide range of clinical conditions. However, oxygen should be regarded as a drug and therefore requires prescribing in all but emergency situations. Failure to administer oxygen appropriately can result in serious harm to the patient. The safe implementation of oxygen therapy with appropriate monitoring is an integral component of the Healthcare Professional's role. Oxygen is administered according to physician order. Oxygen orders should include: -Liter flow -Delivery mode -Frequency Residents who use oxygen will be monitored throughout their shift by the unit nurse to determine effectiveness of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents who require dialysis receive such services, consistent with professional standards of practice, through ongoing communication and collaboration with the dialysis facility for one of one Resident (#10), receiving dialysis. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the hemodialysis communication book was completed by facility staff pre-treatment and dialysis staff post-treatment. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Dialysis, revised 1/28/22, indicated but was not limited to the following: -A communication process must be established between the nursing home and the dialysis facility to be used 24-hours a day. -The care of the resident receiving dialysis services must be reflected by ongoing communication, coordination and collaboration between the nursing home and the dialysis staff. -The facility uses a dialysis communication book which contains a document titled- Dialysis Communication Record- for ongoing communication with the Dialysis center. This is a form of written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-02 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, document review, and interview, the facility failed to ensure that services were coordinated with the Hospice provider to implement the resident's plan of care as required in the provider contract agreement for one Resident (#98), from of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: a. a physician's order for the provision of Hospice care was obtained, and b. an integrated care plan was developed to accurately reflect services provided by both the Hospice provider and facility staff. Findings include: Review of the Hospice Care Services Agreement, signed 5/25/17, included but was not limited to: -The Hospice provider shall collaborate with the Facility and jointly develop written coordinated Plans of Care for each person admitted to Hospice, and the care provided to the Hospice Patient shall be in accordance with the plan; -Hospice and Facility will delineate the responsibility of respective functions agreed upon in the Hospice Plan of Care; -The Facility shall perform and document services described in this Agreement in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-07-17 · tag F0800 — pattern
    Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review, and interviews, the facility failed to provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his/her daily nutritional and special dietary needs, taking into consideration the preferences of each resident. Specifically, for two Residents (#7 and #49), the facility failed to ensure the Residents' food preferences were met. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Food Preferences, dated 2020, indicated but was not limited to the following: -Resident food preferences are kept on file in the Dining Services Department as a part of the meal card system and used to ensure each resident's needs and desires are met. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 6/27/24, indicated that Resident #7 was cognitively intact as evidenced by a score of 15 out of 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS). During an interview with an observation on 7/15/24 at 12:45 P.M., Resident #7 said the food that arrives on meal trays does not match the meal tickets which indicates resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-03-02 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure its staff accurately coded Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments for four Residents (#53, #105, #63, and #101), out of a sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #53, the Resident's diagnosis of diabetes mellitus was coded on the most recent assessment; 2. For Resident #105, discharge status was accurately coded; 3. For Resident #63, pressure ulcer was coded; and 4. For Resident #101, anticoagulation medication was coded. Findings include: 1. Resident #53 was admitted to the facility in September 2021. Review of the MDS assessment, with Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/22/22, indicated under Section I, that the Resident did not have a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Review of the medical record indicated an 8/1/22 Nurse Practitioner's Progress Note indicated Resident #53 had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. During an interview on 3/2/23 at 3:43 P.M., the MDS Coordinator confirmed Resident #53's 12/22/22 MDS did not include the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2023-03-02 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure that individualized, comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised for two Residents (#39, #45), out of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure: 1. For Resident #39, the care plan was revised to reflect a. resolution of bruising; and b. resolution of a stage 2 pressure area to his/her heel; and 2. For Resident #45, the care plan was revised to reflect the resolution of a diabetic ulcer to the right toe. Findings include: 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility in April 2019 with diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease. Review of the 11/10/22 Minimum Data set assessment assessment indicated Resident #45 had moisture associated skin damage and no ulcers or wounds. Review of comprehensive care plans included but was not limited to: a. -Problem: Pain; Resident has bruise to the left elbow (3/30/22) -Approach: Assess remaining skin with care; monitor for signs/symptoms of discomfort (6/30/22); ensure Residents extremities are in proper position before Hoyer is used (3/30/22) -Goal:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avalon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHamilton, NJ 1 of 5Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare CenterSalisbury, MD 1 of 5Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CtrBeverly, MA 1 of 5Canterbury Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Cape Cod Post Acute CareBrewster, MA 1 of 5Crest Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPt Pleasant, NJ 1 of 5Highland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterChelsea, MA 1 of 5Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLumberton, NJ 1 of 5Nashua Post Acute CareNashua, NH 2 of 5Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWayne, NJ 2 of 5Atlantic View Post AcuteNewport News, VA 2 of 5Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Kingstown, RI 2 of 5Collingswood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterProvidence, RI 2 of 5Graduate Post AcutePhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSmithfield, RI 2 of 5Laurel Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMount Laurel, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows At LawrenceLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehabilitation HospitalLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lighthouse Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRevere, MA 2 of 5Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Providence, RI 2 of 5North End Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBoston, MA 2 of 5Orchard Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Palm Springs Post AcuteChelmsford, MA 2 of 5Riverview Healthcare CommunityCoventry, RI 2 of 5Roosevelt Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Southampton Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Springfield Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterSpringfield, PA 2 of 5West Chester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWest Chester, PA 2 of 5Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare CtrBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Willow Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWilmington, MA 2 of 5YORK Post AcuteYorktown, VA 3 of 5Alexandria Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 3 of 5Belmont Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWoodbridge, VA 3 of 5Brighton Post Acute CareBrighton, MA 3 of 5Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5Capitol Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHarrisburg, PA 3 of 5Chelsea Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGoochland, VA 3 of 5Exton Post AcuteExton, PA

Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
QUINTO NEXGEN LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
SKILLED VENTURE LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 04/01/2025
UKR NEXGEN LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
NFR 2020 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
SK NEXGEN TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
TRYKO NEXGEN HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
UAK 2020 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
YK NEXGEN TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
YR NEXGEN TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
WALKER & DUNLOP MULTIFAMILY INCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 04/01/2025
HARMAN, DINAIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
STEVENS, JOELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
STODDARD, JENNIFERIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
VIROJA, YOGESHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
MARQUIS LIMITED LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
RELIANT PRO REHAB LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
LABIB, OSSAMAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
POSEN, MINDEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
FLAGLER, OSHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
KAHANOW, AVIVAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
LEVOVITZ, TZVIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
ROKEACH, FRAIDEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
ROKOWSKY, YITZCHOKIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/18/2025
MILL BROOK PROPERTY LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 44 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-17.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.9M
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 60%Medicare 10%Other / private 30%

This home reported $1.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$395per resident / day
operating cost
$12,020per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$337per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225603. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-28, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next