Mont Marie Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 629 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 80.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 346 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.50 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 81% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 37% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 84 beds and averages 79.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.23 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.93 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.25 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.71 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.44 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.05 to 0.62 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

20 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-04-04 · tag F0622 — isolated
  Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and records reviews, the facility failed to provide appropriate notice of discharge for a facility-initiated discharge, when the Resident did not initiate a request of discharge for one Resident (#72) out of three closed records. Specifically, the facility failed to provide appropriate notice of discharge to Resident #72 when: -the facility determined that the Resident was acting Against Medical Advice (AMA) by driving his/her personal vehicle to a scheduled eye surgery appointment. -the facility notified the Resident he/she was discharged upon return to the facility from the scheduled eye surgery appointment. -the Resident's personal belongings were packed without his/her participation and he/she was discharged with personal belongings to his/her vehicle, resulting in emotional distress when the Resident expected to return to the facility after the eye surgery appointment. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Transfer or Discharge Resident-Initiated, revised October 2022,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-20 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
  Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who experienced an acute onset of shortness of breath, and required the administration of supplemental oxygen, the Facility failed to ensure that nursing staff were competent in how to set-up and operate a portable oxygen tank, when nursing were unaware they needed to use a key to open the tanks valve in order to access and administer the oxygen.Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled, Oxygen Administration, dated August 2021 indicated the following:-Assemble the equipment and supplies as needed, such as a portable oxygen cylinder, and regulator.-Turn on the oxygen-Place appropriate device on the resident (i.e., mask, nasal cannula, and/or nasal catheter).Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in November 2025, diagnoses included Congestive Heart Failure, Chronic Kidney Disease, and Diabetes.Review of Resident #1's Nursing Progress Note, dated 12/29/25 at 11:30 A.M., indicated Resident #1 was alert and breathing on room air (without supplemental oxygen) at 10:18 P.M. and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0573 — isolated
  Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Health Care Proxy had been activated in September 2025, the Facility failed to ensure they maintained Resident #1's rights related to obtaining copies of medical record information, when his/her Health Care Agent (HCA) requested copies of documentation from his/her medical record, and did not receive those copies, in accordance with the regulation. Findings include:Review of the Facility Medical Record Reviews Policy, revised November 2009, indicated that the Facility maintained the confidentiality of each resident's personal and protected health information. The Policy indicated the resident may initiate a request to release such information contained in his/her records and charts to anyone he/she wishes. Such requests will be honored only upon the receipt of a written, signed, and dated request from the resident or representative (sponsor). The Policy indicated the resident may obtain photocopies of his or her records by providing the facility with at least 48 hour (excluding weekends…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-02 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolated
  Provide appropriate foot care.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews, for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), the facility failed to ensure they offered assistance in scheduling a Podiatry appointment as requested to ensure good foot health was maintained.Findings include:Review of the Facility policy titled, Foot Care, revised October 2022, indicated that residents are provided with foot care and treatment in accordance with professional standards of practice and that residents are assisted in making appointments and with transportation to and from specialists (podiatrist, endocrinologist, etc.) as needed.During a telephone interview on 11/26/25 at 2:00 P.M., Visitor #1 said that Resident #1 had very thick and long toenails, that his/her Health Care Agent had requested Podiatry services on admission, and that podiatry services had not been scheduled or provided. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in August 2025, diagnoses included Alzheimer's Disease, urinary tract infection, urinary retention, history of falling, congestive heart failure, and unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition.Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose physician's orders included the administration of multiple medications to help manage his/her specific gastrointestinal diseases, the Facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was provided with nursing care and treatment that met professional standards when the nursing staff failed to administer his/her bowel medications and other medications timely. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Administering Medications, dated as last revised April 2019, indicated the following: - Medications are administered within one (1) hour of prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). Pursuant to Massachusetts General Law (M.G.L.), chapter 112, individuals are given the designation of Registered Nurse and Practical Nurse which includes the responsibility to provide nursing care. Pursuant to the Code of Massachusetts Regulation (CMR) 244, Rules and Regulations 3.02 and 3.04 define the responsibilities and functions of a Registered Nurse and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-15 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose physician's orders included the administration of a medication to manage his/her movement disorder, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from significant medication errors, when upon admission, the medication was inaccurately reconciled from his/her Hospital Discharge Summary by nursing and he/she was administered incorrect dosages of the medication for multiple days. Findings include: Review of the Facility's Policy titled, Medication Reconciliation, dated as last revised [DATE], indicated that the medication reconciliation procedure is to ensure medication safety by accurately accounting for resident's medications, routes and dosages upon admission or readmission to the facility. The Policy further indicated that: - Medication reconciliation is a process of comparing pre-discharge medications to post-discharge medications by creating an accurate list of both prescription and over the counter medications that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide a written Notice of Intent to Transfer and Discharge to the Resident and/or Resident Representative (RR) and notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman at the time of discharge or shortly thereafter for two Residents (#72 and #34) out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to: 1. For Resident #72, provide a written Notice of Intent to Transfer and Discharge and statement of appeal rights as required to the Resident and/or Resident Representative for an unplanned discharge when the facility notified the Resident of the discharge upon his/her return to the facility from a scheduled eye surgery appointment. 2. For Resident #34, provide a written Notice of Intent to Transfer and Discharge to the Resident and/or Resident Representative and notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman when the Resident was transferred to the hospital. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-04 · tag F0742 — isolated
  Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure recommendations made by the Behavioral Health Care Team were implemented for one Resident (#53), out of a total sample of 18 residents. Specifically, for Resident #53, the facility failed to ensure an Electrocardiogram (EKG-noninvasive medical test that records the electrical activity of the heart) was completed every six months as recommended by the Behavioral Health Nurse Practitioner. Findings include: Resident #53 was admitted to the facility in February 2024 with diagnoses including Parkinson's Disease, Obsessive Compulsive Disorder, and Dementia with psychotic disturbance. Review of the Nurse Practitione(NP) from the Behavioral Health Provider Notes, dated 4/3/24, 7/22/24, 9/30/24, 1/27/25, and 3/10/25, indicated the following: >Current Medication -Seroquel (antipsychotic medication that has potential to cause heart arrhythmias) >Plan/Recommendations -Medication Monitoring: EKG for QTc (test that checks for a change in the QTc interval [a part of the heart rhythm] which could indicate potentially dangerous…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to maintain appropriate hygiene practices while serving meals in the dining room, on one (3rd Floor Unit) out of three Units observed. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff who were distributing food during the breakfast meal on the 3rd Floor Unit performed appropriate hand hygiene to prevent contamination and the spread of foodborne illnesses. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Food Preparation and Service, revised 2001, indicated: -Food distribution means the processes involved in getting food to the resident. This may include .dispensing food portions for individual residents, family style and dining room service, or delivering meals to residents' rooms or dining areas to be distributed . -Food service means the process involved in actively serving food to the resident. When actively serving residents in dining room or outside a resident's room where trained staff are serving food/beverage choices from a mobile food cart or steam table, there is not need for food…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-26 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessments were accurately coded for three Residents (#16, #45, #61) out of a total sample of 19 residents and for one Resident (#71) out of three sampled closed records. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure the MDS Assessment: 1. For Resident #16, was accurately coded relative to the use of a feeding tube. 2. For Resident #45, was accurately coded relative to the use of Oxygen. 3.For Resident #61, was accurately coded relative to pressure ulcers (injury to the skin resulting from prolonged pressure) when the Resident had no pressure ulcers. 4. For Resident #74, was accurately coded relative to the discharge destination when the Resident discharged from the facility. Findings include: 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility in November 2023 with diagnoses including severe malnutrition. Review of Resident#16's nutrition care plan, last revised 12/18/23, indicated that the Resident required enteral (passing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-03-26 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record and policy review, and interview, the facility failed to provide care and services for a suprapubic catheter (an indwelling urinary catheter placed directly into the bladder through the abdomen) for one Resident (#30) out of a total sample of 19 residents, to prevent catheter related complications. Specifically, for Resident #30, the facility staff failed to obtain verification of the Physician's order for the correct size of a suprapubic urinary catheter and ensure that the verified size catheter was in place. Findings include: Review of the facility policy for Catheter Care, last revised August 2022, indicated to review the Resident's care plan to assess for any special needs of the Resident to prevent urinary catheter associated complications. Resident #30 was admitted to the facility in March 2020, with diagnoses including malignant neoplasm (a cancerous tumor that spreads), neuromuscular dysfunction (a condition that affects the communication between the muscle and the nerves)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$8,278 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $8,278 — penalty dated 2025-04-04

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 3 rows in the source record cover these 2 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA