No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Chestnut Woods Rehabilitation And Healthcare Ctr

73 Chestnut Street, Saugus, MA 01906 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 88 certified beds · (781) 307-4744 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (781) 307-4744 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0740)
Insights

This home’s record is mixed — some reassuring signs, some worth asking about.

In its favor
  • a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (33) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

4/5
CMS overall
4 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 3 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
225 Boston St · (781) 595-9581 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
841 Western Ave · (781) 592-2248 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
84 Lincoln Ave · (781) 233-6232 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Boston St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
85 Chestnut St · (781) 686-4600

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating4★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased10.9%16.4%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.7%5.1%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.2%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.4%1.8%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms70.8%15.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.4%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened7.6%15.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.9%19.5%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.8%94.8%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.1%4.2%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control21.3%21.2%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.0%21.4%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.8%1.4%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine75.4%77.7%79.4%typical
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission24.9%25.7%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit13.1%11.9%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.531.881.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.201.501.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 369 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
57.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.10hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 57.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 184 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 25% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.4%CMS range 54.0–64.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 8.8–14.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge57.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge57.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge59.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified95.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.4%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.1%CMS range 4.6–10.17.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.911.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.57
RN hours/ resident / day
0.91
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.45
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
40.3%
Total nursing turnover
61.5%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 88 beds and averages 79.4 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 9 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.45 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.57 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 40% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

10
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-10)
11
at the previous standard inspection (2024-09-12)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 23 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Potential for harm · E2025-09-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews the facility failed to ensure the building and equipment was in good condition and had a homelike environment in 38 out of 40 rooms.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Homelike Environment, dated revised February 2021, indicated the following:Residents are provided with a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment .Policy Interpretation and Implementation:2. The facility staff and management maximize, to the extent possible, the characteristics of the facility thatreflect a personalized, homelike setting. These characteristics include:a. clean, sanitary and orderly environment On 9/10/2025 at 8:30 A.M. the surveyor observed the following in the first-floor rooms:105A and B: the over the bed table laminate was peeling off.106B: the over the bed table laminate was peeling off.107A: the over the bed table laminate was peeling off, the Bathroom wall had paint missing and bubbled.108A: the over the bed table laminate was peeling off, the bathroom wall had 2…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure staff treated residents in a dignified manner during the dining experience for one Resident (#69) out of a total of 25 sampled residents.Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Dignity, revised and dated February 2021, indicated the following: - Residents are treated with dignity and respect at all times.-Provided with a dignified dining experience.Resident #69 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses including hemiplegia and dysphagia. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 8/27/25, indicated that Resident #69 was unable to conduct a Brief Interview for Mental Status exam and was severely cognitively impaired. Further review of the MDS indicated that Resident #69 is dependent on staff for eating and received a mechanically altered therapeutic diet. On 9/9/25 at 8:40 A.M., a staff member was observed feeding Resident #69 who was lying in bed while standing over them, not at eye level. The bed was low to the ground. On 9/9/25 at 12:11 P.M., a staff member…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, policy and record review the facility failed to ensure weights were obtained for one Resident (#17) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, for Resident #17 who was assessed as malnourished, the facility failed to obtain his/her weight on readmission or his/her weekly weight per the physician's orders. Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Weight Assessment and Intervention, dated March 2022, indicated Residents are weighed upon admission and at intervals established by the interdisciplinary team. Resident #17 was readmitted to the facility in September 2025 with diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a score of 4 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #17's physician order, dated 9/4/25, indicated weekly weights.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to ensure that services provided met professional standards for one Resident (#69), out of 25 total sampled residents. Specifically, for Resident #69, the facility failed to ensure that his/her air mattress was functioning.Findings include:Review of the manufacturers User Manual for the air mattress system indicated the following: -Power switch is at the right side of the control unit.-Turn ON/OFF the power, the pump will start/stop operation. -A visible indicator (green) tells the pressure has reached a preset or user-defined level. -A visible indicator (yellow or red) warns the pressure is below a preset or user-defined level. Operating Instructions4. Turn on the control unit's power. The indicator of the power switch will come on. The control unit starts to pump air into the mattress. Resident #69 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses including hemiplegia (weakness on one side of the body) and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for three Residents (#17, #68 and #41), out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, 1. For Resident #17, the facility failed to ensure a physician's order was obtained for the use of his/her helmet indicating to staff when to wear and safety precautions.2. For Resident #68 the facility failed to follow a physician's order for a dressing change to the left shin wound.3. for Resident #41 the facility failed to follow a physician's order for a dressing change to the left heel wound.Findings include:1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility in August 2025 with diagnoses that included traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #17's Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], indicated a score of 4 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) indicating…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to develop a treatment for a pressure area on the right heel for one Resident (#41) out of a total sample of 25 residents.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol, dated 2001, indicated that the physician will authorize pertinent orders related to wound treatments, including wound cleansing and dressings. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, malnutrition and trochanteric fracture of the right femur. Review of the care plan dated 9/5/25 indicated a focus for the following: I have skin breakdown; non pressure wound of the left heel and unstageable DTI (deep tissue injury, a type of pressure related skin injury) of the right heel. Review of the physician's orders dated September 2025 indicated the following order: Left heel; cleanse with normal saline, pat dry and apply xeroform followed by an island dressing one time a day. Further review failed to indicate a treatment for pressure area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a safe environment for two Residents (#35, and #6) out of a total sample of 25 residents to prevent accidents/incidents. Specifically:1. For Resident #35, the facility failed to provide a lid for hot coffee and supervision during meals resulting in the Resident spilling hot coffee onto his/her chest, potentially putting the resident at risk for burns.2. For Resident #6, the facility failed to provide a lid for hot coffee and supervision during meals, potentially putting the resident at risk for burns.Findings include:1. Resident #35 was admitted to the facility in April 2014 and has diagnoses that include athetoid cerebral palsy (condition affecting movement and posture), osteoarthritis (joint disease-causing pain and stiffness), gastro esophageal reflux disease (heartburn), and hemiplegia and hemiparesis (complete paralysis of one side of the body, hemiparesis refers to weakness on one side, allowing for some movement), and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolated
    Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure the physician reviewed the pharmacy monthly medication review within 30 days for one (Resident #32) out of a total of 26 sampled residents. Findings include:Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Regimen Review dated July 2025 indicated:A licensed pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly.Time Frame for Reporting:- Within three business days of the MRR (medication regimen review), the consultant pharmacist provides a written report to the attending physician for each resident identified as having a medication irregularity that is deemed not life-threatening.- The consultant pharmacist provides the director of nursing services and medical director with a written, signed, and dated copy of all medication regimen reports., the attending physician reviews and responds to the report. The physician documents in the resident's medical record that the pharmacist's recommendations have been reviewed and what…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and records reviewed, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5% when one nurse observed made four errors out of 26 opportunities, resulting in a medication error rate of 15.38 %. Those errors impacted three Residents (#85, #99 and #22), out of seven residents observed.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Medications, dated as revised April 2019, indicated the following: Medications are administered in a safe, and timely manner, and as prescribed.3. Staff schedules are arranged to ensure that medications are administered without unnecessary interruptions.7. Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before or after meal orders). Review of the facility policy titled, Insulin Administration, dated August 2021, indicated the following: 3. The type of insulin, dosage requirements, strength, and method of administration must be verified before administration, to assure that it corresponds with the order…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for two Residents (#41 and #68) out of a total sample of 25 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to accurately document on the Treatment Administration Record that treatments were not completed as ordered for Resident #41 and Resident #68.Review of the facility policy titled Charting and documentation dated revised July 2017 indicated that documentation in the medical record will be objective, complete and accurate. Review of the facility policy titled Pressure Ulcers/Skin Breakdown-Clinical Protocol indicated that the physician will authorize pertinent orders related to wound treatments, including wound cleansing and dressings. 1. Resident #41 was admitted to the facility in July 2025 with diagnoses including adult failure to thrive, malnutrition and trochanteric fracture of the right femur.Review of the care plan dated 9/5/25 indicated a focus for the following: I have skin breakdown; non pressure wound of the left heel and unstageable DTI (deep tissue injury, a type…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 23 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to implement the plan of care related to assistance with meals for one Resident, (#36), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered policy, dated March 2022 indicated: Policy statement: A comprehensive person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident. 7. The comprehensive, person centered care plan: includes measurable objectives and timeframes; describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well being. Resident #36 was admitted to the facility in June of 2022 with diagnoses including dementia and weakness. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated Resident #36 scored 5 out of a possible 15 on the Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to meet professional standards of quality for four Residents (#49, #15, #42 and #17), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically: 1) For Resident #49 the facility failed to follow physician orders for weekly skin checks. 2) For Resident #15 the facility failed to complete skin checks as ordered. 3) For Resident #42 the facility failed to implement air mattress setting as indicated in the physician order. 4) For Resident #17 the facility failed to to obtain weekly weights according to physician's order. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy, titled Assessment of Skin Condition and Integrity, adopted March 2021, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: Skin Assessment: 1) Conduct a comprehensive head-to-toe skin assessment upon admission, weekly, prior to discharge and as needed. a.) During the skin assessment, inspect for: i. Presence of skin impairment(s); ii. Type of skin impairment(s); and iii. Location of skin…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation record review and interview, the facility failed to provide necessary treatment and care for one Resident (#33) out of a total of 21 sampled residents. Specifically, the facility failed to ensure treatment orders were initiated for Resident #33's skin tears. Findings include: Review of the Wound Treatment policy, dated April 2024, indicated: The purpose of this procedure is to provide guidelines for the care of wounds to promote healing. Verify that there is a physician's order for this procedure. Resident #33 was re-admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia and venous insufficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated Resident #33 scored 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (MDS) indicating intact cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident #33 requires assistance with bathing and dressing. During an interview on 9/10/24 at 8:57 A.M., the surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure physicians orders and care plans related to the use of a catheter were implemented for one Resident (#33) out of a total of 21 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the Urinary Incontinence - Clinical Protocol policy dated April 2018 indicated: Assessment and Recognition: As part of the initial assessment, the physician will help identify individuals with impaired urinary continence. For example, review of a hospital discharge summary may reveal that the individual was incontinent with or without catheter placement during a recent hospitalization. Resident #33 was initially admitted to the facility in August 2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia and venous insufficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) 8/26/24 indicated Resident #33 scored 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (MDS) indicating intact cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident #33 requires assistance toileting and did not have an indwelling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0694 — isolated
    Provide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, policy review and interviews, the facility failed to provide care and maintenance of a peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC), consistent with professional standards of practice for one Resident (#237), out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the facility failed to implement dressing changes routinely as required. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes' dated March 2022, indicated the following but not limited to: -Perform site care and dressing change at established intervals or immediately if the integrity of the dressing is compromised (e.g, damp, loosened or visibly soiled). -Maintain sterile dressing ( transparent semi-permeable membrane (TSM) dressing or sterile gauze for all central vascular access devices. The type of dressing is based on the condition of then resident and his or her preference. -Change the dressing if it becomes damp loosened or visibly soiled and: a. Every seven days for TSM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review, policy review and interview the facility failed to ensure a plan of care was developed for Trauma Informed Care, with individualized interventions, for one Resident (#7) who had a history of trauma out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, for Resident #7, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive trauma care plan, with individualized triggers. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Trauma Informed and Culturally Competent Care, dated 8/2022, indicated the following: Purpose: -To guide staff in providing care that is culturally competent and trauma-informed in accordance with professional standards of practice. -To address the needs of trauma survivors by minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. Definitions: - Trigger is a psychological stimulus and prompts recall of a previous traumatic event, even if the stimuli itself is not traumatic or frightening. Resident Care Planning: -Develop and individualized care plan that addresses past trauma in collaboration with the resident and family, as appropriate. -Identify and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that one Resident (#64) was free from significant medication errors out of a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically, the nurses did not administer the wrong dispensed dosage of Trazadone (an antidepressant). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Administering Medications' revised April 2019, indicated the following but not limited to: -If a dosage is believed to be inappropriate or excessive for a resident or a medication has been identified as having potential adverse consequences for the resident or is suspected of being associated with adverse consequences the person preparing or administering the medication will contact the prescriber the residents attending physician or the facilities medical director to discuss the concerns. -The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident right medication right dosage right time right method route of administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure medications with short expirations dates were dated when opened. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Medication Labeling and Storage' revised February 2023, indicated the following but not limited to: *Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. *Multi-dose vials that are not opened or accessed are discarded according to the manufacturer's expiration date. 1. During an inspection of the [NAME] unit on 9/12/24 at 6:35 A.M., the following medications were available for administration: - Two incruse Ellipta inhalers 62.5 (mcg) microgram inhalation powder opened and undated. - One Advair 100/50 mcg opened and undated. - One Advair 250/50 mcg opened and undated. - One albuterol sulfate 90 mcg opened and undated. - One Symbicort inhaler 80-4.5mcg opened and undated. - One…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to: 1. ensure medication administration was accurately documented for two Residents (#33 and #35) and 2. failed to accurately document blood pressure readings for one Resident (#37) out of a total of 21 sampled Residents. Findings include: 1a. Resident #33 was re-admitted to the facility in September 2024 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dysphagia and venous insufficiency. Review of the Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) 8/26/24 indicated Resident #33 scored 15 out of a possible 15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status exam (MDS) indicating intact cognition. The MDS also indicated Resident #33 requires assistance with bathing, dressing and toileting. Review of the September 2024 Medication Administrative Record (MAR) indicated the following medication were not documented as administered on the 7:00 A.M. - 3:00 P.M. shift on 9/8/24: Aripiprazole (an antipsychotic medication) Oral Tablet 5 MG: Give one tablet by mouth one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-09-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to 1. ensure staff initiated and followed Enhanced Barrier Precautions for one Resident (#33) out of a total of 21 sampled residents, and 2. failed to ensure shared medical equipment was properly cleaned between the use of residents during the medication pass. Findings include: Review of the Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy, dated August 2022 indicated: 1. Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) are used as an infection prevention and control intervention to reduce the spread of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. 2. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities when contact precautions do not apply otherwise. Gloves and gown are applied prior to performing high contact resident care activity (as opposed to entering the room). 3. Examples of high contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBP's include: dressing, transferring, device care or use (central line, urinary catheter, feeding tube, etc); wound care. 6. EBPs remain in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one for three sampled residents (Resident #1), whose Physician's Orders included the administration of an injectable medication used to treat schizophrenia, the Facility failed to ensure the Physician was promptly notified when Resident #1's medication was not administered as ordered. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled Change in a Resident's Condition or Status, undated, indicated that the nurse will notify the resident's attending Physician when there has been a need to alter the resident's medical treatment significantly. The Policy indicated that regardless of the resident's current mental or physical condition, a nurse or healthcare provider will inform the resident of any changes in his/her medical care or nursing treatments. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in July 2015, diagnoses included major depressive disorder, adult failure to thrive, auditory hallucinations, anxiety, and paranoid schizophrenia. Review of Resident #1's Physician's Orders, dated 10/05/23, indicated he/she was to be administered Invega Sustenna…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of three sampled residents (Resident #1), who had a Physician's Order for administration of an anti-psychotic medication once every twenty-eight days, the Facility failed to ensure he/she was free from a significant medication error when he/she was not administered two doses of his/her anti-psychotic medication, placing him/her at risk for an adverse reaction related to a sudden stop in the medication. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled Administering Medications, dated as revised April 2019, indicated that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Review of the Drugs.com article related to Invega Sustenna injections, dated August 2023, indicated the following: The medication is an extended release (long acting) medication given by intramuscular injection and used to treat schizophrenia. The article indicated when starting the medication one dose is administered, the second dose a week later, and there after, only one dose each month…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on records reviewed and interviews for one of two sampled residents (Resident #1), the Facility failed to ensure they maintained complete and accurate Medical Records when Resident #1's Medication Administration Record (MAR) was not consistently completed during the month of December 2023. Findings Include: The Facility Policy titled Charting and Documentation, dated as revised 07/2017, indicated all services provided to the resident, progress toward the care plan goals, or any changes in the resident's medical, physical, functional, or psychosocial condition, shall be documented in the resident's medical record. The Policy indicated that medications administered and treatments or services performed were to be documented in the resident medical record. The Policy indicated documentation of procedures and treatments would include care specific details such as the date and time the procedure/treatment was provided, whether the resident refused the procedure/treatment, and signature and title of the individual documenting. Resident #1 was admitted to the Facility in July 2015,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on policy review, observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide assistance with Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) for one Resident (#2) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), Supporting, last revised 3/18, indicated the following: Policy Statement: *Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADL's). *Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently will receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal hygiene. Policy Interpretation and Implementation: *2. Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with: D. dining (meals and snack)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary treatment and services to prevent the development and promote healing of pressure ulcers for one Residents (#49) out of a total of 24 sampled residents. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses unsteadiness on feet, unstageable pressure ulcer of left buttock, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition and gastrostomy. Review of Resident #49's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 out of possible 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further indicated Resident #49 had one of more unhealed pressure ulcers at stage one or higher. On 9/26/23 at 9:14 A.M., the surveyor observed Resident #49 sitting up in bed, a dressing wrapped the left foot and no Prevalon boots (a pressure relieving device for the heels) were observed. Additional observations were made by the surveyor on 9/26/23 at 4:03 P.M.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview the facility failed to provide behavioral health services as recommended by the behavioral health service Nurse Practitioner for one Resident (#20) out of a total sample of 24 residents. Findings include: Resident #20 was admitted to the facility in December 2022 with diagnoses including sepsis, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder with severe psychotic features. Review of Resident #20's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of a possible 15 indicating intact cognition. Further review of the MDS indicated Resident #20 had no behaviors. During an observation on 9/26/23 at 9:17 A.M., Resident #20 was observed lying in bed. Resident #20 told the surveyor the course of events requiring him/her to be in the facility. Resident #20 began crying while talking with the surveyor and expressed being sad. Resident #20 said he/she used to have someone that would come into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure recommendations from the Monthly Medication Review conducted by the pharmacist were addressed and acknowledged by the physician in a timely manner for one Resident (#30) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Medication Regimen Reviews, undated, indicated the following: *The consultant pharmacist performs a medication regimen review (MRR) for every resident in the facility receiving medication at least monthly. *Within 24 hours of the MRR, the consultant pharmacist provides a written report to the attending physicians for each resident, the report contains: the resident's name, the name of the medication, the identified irregularity and the pharmacist's recommendation. *If the physician does not provide a timely response or adequate response, the consultant pharmacist identifies that no action has been taken, he/she contacts the medical director or administrator. *The attending physician documents in the medical record that the irregularity has been reviewed and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, record reviews, policy review, and interviews, the facility failed to ensure it was free from a medication error rate of greater than 5 percent. Two out of two nurses observed made three errors in 31 opportunities on one of two units resulting in a medication error rate of 9.68%. These errors impacted two Residents (#74 and #27), out of five residents observed. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Administering Medications' revised April 2019, indicated the following but not limited to: Policy Statement: Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Policy Interpretation and Implementation *Medications must be administered in accordance with the orders, including any required time frame. * The individual administering the medication must check the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, right dosage, right time, and right method (route) of administration before giving the medication. 1. During a medication pass on 9/27/23 at 9:16 A.M., the surveyor observed Nurse #1 prepare and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, policy review, and interview the facility failed to ensure medications with short expirations dates, were dated when opened, on two out of four medication carts. Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled 'Medication Labeling and Storage' revised February 2023, indicated the following but not limited to: *Multi-dose vials that have been opened or accessed (e.g., needle punctured) are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial. *Multi-dose vials that are not opened or accessed are discarded according to the manufacturer's expiration date. 1. During an inspection of SCU medication cart on 9/27/23 at 9:40 A.M., the following medications were available for administration: -3 Fluticasone furoate/vilanterol elipta inhalation powder 100 mcg (micrograms)/ 25 mcg, opened and undated hence unable to determine the expiration date. -1 Fluticasone propionate nasal spray 50 mcg opened and undated. During an interview on 9/27/23 at 9:43 A.M., Nurse #1 said inhalers and nasal sprays should be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide dental services for two Residents (#6 and #30) out of a total sample of 24 residents. 1. Resident #6 has had multiple admissions, most recently admitted to the facility in September 2022, with diagnoses including dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and cerebral infarct. Review of Resident #6's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed the Resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 10 out of a possible 15, indicating he/she has moderate cognitive impairments. The MDS also indicated Resident #6 requires extensive assistance of one person for all self-care activities. During an interview on 9/26/23 at 9:07 A.M., Resident #6 said his/her dentures had been missing for a few months. Resident #6 was asked if he/she told staff, he/she said yes. Review of Resident #6's medical record indicated he/she has an oral/dental health care plan initiated on 6/15/23 indicating the following: *Focus: I am at risk…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolated
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observations and interview, the facility failed to properly store food items to prevent the risk of foodborne illness. Specifically, the facility failed to separate personal food items from resident food items in the walk-in refrigerator. Findings include: During the revisit to the kitchen on 9/27/23 at 11:38 A.M., the surveyor observed three cups of iced coffee with straws sticking out from the top stored in the walk-in refrigerator in the same area where resident food is stored. During an interview on 9/27/23 at 12:10 P.M., the Foodservice Director said personal food items should not be stored with resident food.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-28 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to maintain accurate medical records for two Residents ( #49 and #30) out of a total sample of 24 Residents. Specifically, 1) For Resident #49 the facility failed to (a) accurately document the application of prevalon boots and (b) accurately document the implementation of contact precautions. 2) For Resident #30, staff signed off on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) that the Resident was wearing a hand splint while the facility reported it missing and was not being worn by Resident #30. Findings include: 1 a. Resident #49 was admitted to the facility in August 2023 with diagnoses including unsteadiness on feet, unstageable pressure ulcer of left buttock, unspecified protein calorie malnutrition and gastrostomy. Review of Resident #49's most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 10 out of possible 15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. The MDS further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-09-12 · tag F0641 — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment was accurately completed to reflect the status for three Residents (#80, #237, and # 27), in a total sample of 21 residents. Specifically: 1) For Resident #80, the facility failed to ensure the MDS accurately reflected the Resident's discharge destination. 2) For Resident #237, the facility failed to ensure the MDS accurately reflected the Resident's type of intravenous line. 3) For Resident #27, the facility failed to ensure MDS accurately reflected the Resident's Special Treatments. Findings Include: Review of the facility policy titled Resident Assessments, revised October 2023, indicated, but was not limited to, the following: - Information in the MDS assessments will consistently reflect information in the progress notes, plans of care and resident observations/interviews. 1. Resident #80 was admitted to the facility in July 2024 with a diagnosis of cancer. Review of the Discharge Assessment - Return not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 4 of 53.0+1.0 vs chain
Health inspection 3 of 52.6+0.4 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.3-0.3 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avalon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHamilton, NJ 1 of 5Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare CenterSalisbury, MD 1 of 5Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CtrBeverly, MA 1 of 5Canterbury Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Cape Cod Post Acute CareBrewster, MA 1 of 5Crest Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPt Pleasant, NJ 1 of 5Highland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterChelsea, MA 1 of 5Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLumberton, NJ 1 of 5Nashua Post Acute CareNashua, NH 2 of 5Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWayne, NJ 2 of 5Atlantic View Post AcuteNewport News, VA 2 of 5Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Kingstown, RI 2 of 5Collingswood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterProvidence, RI 2 of 5Graduate Post AcutePhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSmithfield, RI 2 of 5Laurel Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMount Laurel, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows At LawrenceLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehabilitation HospitalLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lighthouse Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRevere, MA 2 of 5Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Providence, RI 2 of 5North End Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBoston, MA 2 of 5Orchard Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Palm Springs Post AcuteChelmsford, MA 2 of 5Riverview Healthcare CommunityCoventry, RI 2 of 5Roosevelt Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Southampton Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Springfield Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterSpringfield, PA 2 of 5West Chester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWest Chester, PA 2 of 5Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare CtrBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Willow Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWilmington, MA 2 of 5YORK Post AcuteYorktown, VA 3 of 5Alexandria Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 3 of 5Belmont Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWoodbridge, VA 3 of 5Brighton Post Acute CareBrighton, MA 3 of 5Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5Capitol Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHarrisburg, PA 3 of 5Chelsea Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGoochland, VA 3 of 5Exton Post AcuteExton, PA

Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
QUINTO HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2014
UKR CONSULTING LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2014
NFR 2020 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
SK 2013 DELTA TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
SORA KOHN FAM TR UAD 120120OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
TRYKO HOLDINGS, LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2014
UAK 2020 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
YR 2013 DELTA TR UA 03252013OrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/31/2021
MANUFACTURERS & TRADERS TRUST COMPANYOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 06/01/2014
SOLIS, LILYBETHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/16/2024
VIROJA, YOGESHIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
MARQUIS LIMITED LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
RELIANT PRO REHAB LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/13/2017
LIKHI, RISHIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2014
POSEN, MINDEEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
LEXINGTON ESTATES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 06/01/2014

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$12.0M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-3.8%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense18% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 54%Medicare 20%Other / private 26%

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$431per resident / day
operating cost
$13,112per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$416per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MA

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Massachusetts Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Massachusetts
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$15,817/mo
Nursing home (private)
$9,600/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 225370. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next