Meadow Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center
1525 North Rolling Road, Catonsville, MD 21228 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 120 certified beds · (410) 402-1200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- a middle-of-the-pack inspection score (3/5)
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567)
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (52) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $11,452 in federal fines (most recent 2025-06-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 3 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 4 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 3.5% | 20.4% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 11.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.5% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.2% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 95.2% | 22.8% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.6% | 2.4% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 4.8% | 16.7% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.0% | 96.6% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.8% | 5.9% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 20.5% | 25.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 8.6% | 13.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.6% | 80.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 11.3% | 21.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 4.0% | 9.8% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.19 | 1.33 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.30 | 1.20 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
53.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 274 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 84.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 150 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 38% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 53.7%CMS range 47.4–60.7 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.9%CMS range 10.1–16.5 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 84.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 80.0% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 82.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.1% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 98.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.4% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.0%CMS range 4.0–8.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.35 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 114.8 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.09 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.73 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.80 to 0.47 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
52 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 40 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews and observations, it was determined that the facility staff failed to adequately monitor a cognitively impaired resident who had exit seeking behaviors. This was found to be evident for 1 (#217) out of 2 residents reviewed for exit seeking behaviors during the recertification survey. This deficient practice was determined to be an Immediate Jeopardy past non-compliance after the investigation was completed. The findings include: A review of Resident #217 electronic medical record (EMR) on 06/11/25 revealed on 11/11/24 Resident #217 left their room located on the first floor and went to the front desk and attempted to leave the facility. After the attempted elopement, the resident was recommended to have a monitoring device placed to notify the facility staff if the resident attempted to leave the building. The elopement assessment dated [DATE] indicated the resident had a Wanderguard bracelet placed. On 06/11/25 at 11:48 AM a review of the facility's investigation related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations; the review of medical records, administrative reports, and other pertinent documentation; and interviews with facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to prevent Resident #33 from exiting the building unattended on 6/7/22; failed to develop and implement timely interventions to address Resident #93's exit-seeking behavior, and failed to ensure the facility's exterior doors were secured, alarmed, and functioning properly. The deficient practice was evident for 2 of 4 residents reviewed for elopement during the survey; however, the facility's failures had the potential to impact 4 of 4 residents identified as at risk for wandering or elopement. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure that all medication carts remained locked and secured this was evident one medication cart. On Tuesday, 6/8/22 at 12:00 a.m., an Immediate Jeopardy was called related to the facility's failure to implement measures for residents with exit-seeking behaviors and inability to secure and alarm the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were treated with dignity and respect when staff publicly labeled residents as feeders on a dry erase board visible from the hallway and nurse's station. This practice compromised resident dignity, confidentiality, and privacy rights and affected Resident (R) #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35 and was observed during the complaint survey.Findings include:On 4/27/26 at 10:47 AM, 4/28/26 at 11:29 AM, 4/28/26 at 10:02 PM, 4/29/26 at 12:47 AM, and 4/30/26 at 10:05 AM, the surveyor observed a dry erase board located on the second floor next to the nurse's station. The board listed the above room numbers for Residents #23, #24, #25, #26, #27, #28, #29, #30, #31, #32, #33, #34, #35 under a heading identifying the residents as feeders. The board was visible to staff, visitors, and anyone passing through the area, allowing resident care needs to be publicly disclosed.During an interview on 4/28/26 at 10:11 PM, GNA #15 stated that residents who are total care receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of verbal abuse was reported and handled in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) requirements for 1 (Resident #12) of 1 resident reviewed for abuse allegations during the complaint survey. The Findings include:Record review on 4/27/26 at 10:09 am revealed Resident #12 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behavioral disturbance, hemiplegia, HIV disease, dysphagia, and cognitive communication deficits.An examination of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) on 4/30/26 at 2:30 pm revealed an anonymous allegation was received stating that Resident #12's, daughter was verbally abusive toward the resident. Per the FRI, staff and the Administrator became aware of the allegation on 10/31/25 at 10:00 am, contacted the local police department at on 10/31/25 at 10:05 am, reported the allegation to the resident's representative who was also the alleged perpetrator on 10/31/25 at 10:30…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the clinical record was accurate, complete, and consistent for 1 (Resident #17) of 1 resident reviewed for an unexpected change in condition during the complaint survey. The findings include:During a record review on [DATE] at 12:27 pm, it was revealed that Resident #17 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, obstructive sleep apnea, chronic kidney disease, and malnutrition.An examination of a progress note dated [DATE] at 9:36 am written by LPN#6, for Resident #17 on [DATE] at 1:25 pm indicated the resident expired on [DATE] following an early morning change in condition. The change of condition was documented in the vital sign log dated [DATE] for oxygen saturations at 4:45 am, showing oxygen saturation at 60% and in the progress note the Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #6) documented checking on the resident at 4:45 am and stated .Shortly afterward, during…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, clinical record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to maintain an infection control program that would prevent and protect residents from the risk of infection for two (2) (Resident #14 and Resident #15) of 35 sampled residents reviewed during the complaint survey.The findings include: Review on 5/1/26 at 11:15 AM of the facility's Enhanced Barrier Precautions policy dated 2001 (Med-Pass) noted 1. Enhanced barrier precautions (EBPs) refer to infection prevention and control interventions designed to reduce the transmission of multi-drug resistant organisms (MDROs) during high contact resident care activities. 2. Enhanced barrier precautions apply when.b. A resident is NOT known to be infected or colonized with any MDRO, has a wound or indwelling medical devices, and does not have secretions or excretions that are unable to be covered or contained.7. EBPs employ targeted gown and glove use in addition to standard precautions during high contact resident care activities.a. Gloves and gown are applied prior to performing the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on staff interview it was determined the facility failed to provide residents with access to their funds 24 hours a day/7 days a week. This was found to be evident for 1 of 1 residents that were reviewed for care during an annual survey. The findings include: On 6/16/2025 at 2:15 PM the Business Office Manager was interviewed regarding resident access to their funds that are held by the facility. The Business Office Manager stated that the residents had access to their funds Monday through Friday from 8:00 AM to approximately 6 PM, during the Business Office Manager's normal working hours. They also said that the facility did not have a procedure in place for any other member of staff to provide the residents with their funds during the hours the Business Office Manager was not in the building.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, observation and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the residents' personal property was kept from loss. This was evident for 1 (Resident # 65) of 57 residents reviewed during the annual re-certification survey. The findings include: On 6/09/25, at 12:23 PM, Resident #65 was interviewed and reported missing clothing. Resident #65 stated they were unable to attend church because they had no clothes and expressed being upset as they attend church every Sunday. Resident #65 noted that the clothes they were wearing were all they had left. On 6/10/25, at 8:26 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and stated that the admitting nurse completes the inventory list with the resident upon admission. If the resident is capable, they sign the inventory list; otherwise, the resident's representative signs it, and this is placed in their chart. On 6/11/25 at 8:30 AM the inventory sheet for Resident #65 was reviewed and revealed the resident representative signed the inventory sheet on 04/11/24. Further review of the inventory sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview, the facility staff failed to thoroughly investigate a complaint of abuse (Resident #120). This was evident for 1 out of 57 residents reviewed during a complaint/annual survey. Findings include: Review of Resident #120's facility reported incident (MD00178521) on 6/11/25 at 8:30 AM revealed the resident made an allegation of abuse after the resident reported to the facility that a nursing staff member pried medications out of the resident's left hand during a medication pass. An additional facility reported incident (MD00186277) on 6/11/25 at 8:40 AM revealed the resident made an allegation of abuse after the resident reported to the facility that a nursing staff member provided the resident with rough care when the nursing staff member dispensed nose drops. The surveyor requested the facility investigations for MD00178521 and MD00186277 on 6/11/25 at 9:00 AM. Interview with the Administrator on 6/11/25 at 11:30 AM revealed the facility did not have the facility investigations for MD00178521 and MD00186277. The Administrator stated that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to complete a Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) II for a resident. This was found to be evident for 1 (#97) out of 3 residents reviewed for PASRR II completion during the recertification survey. The findings include: Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) is a federal requirement for Medicaid-certified nursing facilities to ensure individuals seeking admission are appropriately placed and receive necessary services, especially those with mental illness or intellectual/developmental disabilities. A record review on 6/10/25 at 9:10 AM for Resident #97 did not reveal a PASRR II. A review of 5/6/25 admission MDS revealed Section I was coded for PTSD and Bipolar diagnoses, which require PASRR II screening. During an interview on 06/13/25 on 11:15 AM, the Director of Social Services stated that Resident # 97 was admitted short term, however, after 30 days, a PASRR II should have been completed. The Director of Social Services indicated a correction was filed. On 06/13/25 at 02:43…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-18 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and medical record reviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement a process to ensure residents receive written notice of room changes. This was evident for 1 (Residents #51) out of 1 resident, who expressed concern regarding room change notification during the recertification survey. The findings include: During an interview on 06/17/25 at 08:28 AM, Resident # 51 expressed concern that the facility had not provided written notification of roommate changes, and stated, this is a violation of my resident rights. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) and Administrator on 06/17/25 at 09:15 AM, the surveyors were informed that although residents receive verbal notification of room changes, written notification is not provided. An example of verbal notification documentation was provided. The DON concurred that this practice did not meet the regulatory requirement for written notification.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review and interview it was determined that the facility staff failed to report a resident eloped from the facility within the 2-hour allotted timeframe. This deficient practice was evidenced in 1 (#271) of 1 facility reported incident reviewed for an elopement during the recertification survey. The findings are: On 06/11/25 at 12:28 PM a review of the investigation of the facility reported incident (FRI) related to Resident #217 revealed the incident was reported to the state agency on 03/25/25 at 12:19 AM which was outside of the two-hour allotted timeframe to report the incident. The alleged incident occurred on 03/24/25 at 12:30 AM. The Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were made aware of the incident on 03/24/25 at 1:45 AM. On 06/11/25 at 12:52 PM during an interview with the Administrator he/she verbalized they follow the guidelines of the state agency regarding reporting incidents. They currently don't have a policy for reporting. The surveyor asked who is responsible for reporting incidents to the state agency. The Administrator and the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 40 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure a resident's medical record was accurate. This deficient practice was evident for 1 (#217) in 2 medical records reviewed for accuracy during the recertification survey. The findings include: On 06/11/25 at 12:19 PM a review of Resident #217's electronic medical record revealed the resident had a diagnosis of a complete traumatic amputation of the left lower leg. On 06/12/25 at 10:13 AM a review of Resident #217's skin assessment revealed the resident had a left heel wound. On 06/18/25 at 11:25 PM during an interview with the Administrator, the surveyor reported it was documented in the resident's electronic medical record that the resident had a complete traumatic amputation of the left lower leg, but it was documented on the wound progress report that the resident had a left heel wound. On 06/18/25 at 1:46 PM during an interview with the Administrator the surveyor asked who is responsible for ensuring the residents' diagnoses are entered correctly in the electronic medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-06-23 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews it was determined the facility staff failed to maintain infection control practices as evidenced by staff not maintaining a resident's oxygen tubing and disposing of waste according to professional standards. This was evident in 1 of the 3 residents observed for infection control practices (Resident #60). The finding includes: On 06/07/22 at 9:44 am during an interview with Resident #60 the surveyor noticed the resident was not wearing her oxygen tubing. Under further inspection, the surveyor noticed the oxygen tubing was on the floor under the resident's bed. The surveyor made RN #17 the resident's assigned nurse aware. On 06/07/22 at 09:50 am RN #17 came into the resident's room and observed the resident's oxygen tubing on the floor under the bed. After surveyor intervention, the resident was provided a new oxygen tubing that was applied to the nasal passages.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of residents by leaving Resident #45's face soiled with food after the resident was assisted with a meal and neglecting to cover a residents urinary collection bag. This was evident for 2 of 22 residents reviewed during the facility's annual survey (Residents #49 and #159). 1.) The facility staff failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity by failing to cleanse Resident #49's face after feeding him/her breakfast. During observations rounds on 6/7/22 at 9:45 am AM Resident #45 was observed with eggs on the right side of his/her face. A review of Resident #45's medical record on 6/7/22 at 10:00 AM, revealed the resident is totally dependent on staff for care. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #8 on 6/7/22 at 10:15 AM, s/he stated, the resident had been fed earlier and the GNA assigned to the resident should have cleaned his/her face prior to leaving the room. The findings were verified by RN #8. 2.) The facility staff failed to treat a resident with respect and dignity by failing to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to accommodate the needs of a resident by failing to ensure a resident's call bell was in reach when needed (Residents #9 and Resident #51). This was evident in 2 of 22 residents reviewed during the facility's annual survey. The findings include: A call bell is a bedside button tethered to the wall in the resident's room, which directs signals to the nursing station; a call light usually indicates that the patient has a need or perceived need requiring attention from the nurse or geriatric nursing assistant (GNA) on duty. 1. On 6/5/2022 at 9:50 a.m. Resident #9 was observed lying in bed, when asked about the location of his/her call bell, the Resident #9 looked around for the device. The device was observed on the floor next to the right side of the resident's bed. On 6/5/2022 at 9:50 a.m. GNA #24 was interviewed the GNA verified the surveyors observation and the location of Resident #9's call bell. 2. On 6/5/2022 at 10:15 a.m. Resident #51 was observed lying in bed. The resident's call bell was located inside the first drawer…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews it was determined the facility failed to provide a homelike environment as evidenced by residents having stained linen and soiled equipment in residents' rooms. This was evident for 1 of 4 residents assessed for a clean and comfortable homelike environment (Residents #29). The finding includes: On 06/07/22 at 11:02 am the surveyor observed Resident #29 in bed receiving enteral nutrition (nutrition provided through a tube contacted to the stomach). The enteral feeding pump was attached to an intravenous pole, which had dried enteral feeding on the base. While attempting to interview Resident #69 in his/her room on 06/07/22 at 11:24 am, the surveyor observed stained linen on the resident's bed, this observation was made after the linen was changed. During an interview with GNA #30 on 06/07/22 at 11:30 am he/she stated most of the linens have stains on them. GNA #30 retrieved another fitted sheet; however, that sheet stained as well. On 06/10/22 at 10:15 am in an interview, Unit Manager #23, he reported the staff was supposed to clean up the enteral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to complete an investigation into allegations of abuse. This was found to be evident for 4 of 11 complaints reviewed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey (Residents # 366, 367, 368, and # 370). The findings include 1. On 6/7/22 at 10:00 a.m. the survey team requested documentation of the facility's investigations into allegations of abuse. A review of the facility's investigations revealed the following: On 11/21/2021 Resident #360 made an allegation of abuse. A review the facility's investigation revealed the file contained Resident #face sheet and a facility self-reporting form. There were no interview statements from staff or residents or resident assessments. On 7/16/2021 Resident #367 made an allegtion of abuse. A review the facility's investigation revealed a copy of the resident's face sheet, a facility self-reporting form, and typed interview statements from 4 staff (a Nurse Practitioner, a OTA, a Nurse, and a GNA). There were no resident interviews…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined the facility staff failed to complete a Notice of Transfer when a resident was sent to the hospital. This was evident in 1 of 1 (Resident #37) resident records reviewed for transfer documentation. The findings include: On 06/16/22 at 10:40 am while reviewing Resident#37 electronic medical record, the surveyor noticed there no documentation of a Notice of Transfer for review when the resident was sent to the hospital on [DATE]. The surveyor spoke with the Director of Nursing (DON), Staff #3, and requested a copy of the document. On 06/17/22 at 9:45 am the DON, Staff#3 made the surveyor aware there was not a transfer summary.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0636 — isolatedAssess the resident completely in a timely manner when first admitted, and then periodically, at least every 12 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and staff interview, it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments were accurately coded. This was evident for 1 of 4 (#23) residents reviewed for dialysis during the revisit survey. The findings include: The MDS is part of the Resident Assessment Instrument that was Federally mandated in legislation passed in 1986. The MDS is a set of assessment screening items employed as part of a standardized, reproducible, and comprehensive assessment process that ensures each resident's individual needs are identified, that care is planned based on those individualized needs, and that the care is provided as planned to meet the needs of each resident. On 8/26/22 at 11:40 AM a review of Resident #23's medical record revealed a physician's order, pre and post dialysis weight on Mon, Wed, Fri. two times a day every Mon, Wed, Fri. that was written on 8/14/22. A 8/17/22 at 11:00 AM progress note documented, patient came back from Dialysis, vitals stable. Dialysis is a procedure to remove waste products and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, record review, and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that a resident's care plan intervention was implemented for making sure the call bell was within reach when needed. This was evident for 1 of 3 (#9) residents reviewed for access to the call bell during the revisit survey. The findings include: A call bell is a bedside button or cord attached to the wall in the resident's room, which allows the resident to alert a nurse or other healthcare staff member remotely of their need for help. The use of a nurse call bell system is designed to contribute to ensuring resident safety and allows residents in healthcare setting to alert staff remotely of their need for help. Immobile residents can use the nurse call bell to communicate with staff for any type of assistance. On 8/25/2022 at 1:20 PM, Resident #9 was observed lying in bed. When asked to use her/his call bell, Resident #9 looked around for the device but could not find it. The call bell was observed dangling on the floor and attached to the left upper side of the resident's bed.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility's staff failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 12 residents reviewed during this annual survey (Resident #49 and #79). The findings include: 1. During observations rounds on 6/7/22 at 9:45 am AM Resident #45 was observed with eggs on the right side of his/her face. A review of the resident's medical record on 6/7/22 at 10:00 AM, revealed the resident is totally dependent on staff for care. During an interview with the Registered Nurse (RN) #8 on 6/7/22 at 10:15 AM, s/he stated, the resident had been feed earlier and the GNA assigned to the resident should have cleaned his/her face prior to leaving the room. The findings were verified by RN #8. 2. The surveyor conducted an interview with a member of Resident #79's family on 6/10/22 at 1:30 pm. The family member complained that assigned facility failed to provide personal care to the resident for most of the day. On 6/10/22 at 1:44 pm the surveyor observed Resident #79 dressed in nightclothes. Resident #79 was interviewed on 6/10/22 at 1:44 pm the resident stated, I asked staff to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, observations and interview, the facility staff failed to follow a physician's orders by not consistently weighing , and for failing to follow physician orders for the administration of oxygen therapy. This was evident for 2 out of 22 residents reviewed during an annual survey (Residents #61 and #66). The findings include: 1. On 6/5/2022 at 1:00 p.m. a review of Resident #66's medical record revealed an order on 4/15/2022 at 6:51 p.m. for Resident #66 to receive Oxygen (O2) at 2 liters per nasal cannula. On 6/6/2022 at 9:30 a.m. a review of medical record revealed an order for weights every two (2) weeks on Monday from 12/14/2020-4/15/2022. The following weights were documented 5/31/2021 (221.6 lbs.), 9/20/2021 (220 lbs.), 2/21/2021 221.5 lbs.), 3/7/2021 (219 lbs.), 4/4/2022 (186 lbs.), no other weights were documented after 4/4/2022. An oxygen concentrator is a device that concentrates the oxygen from a gas supply to provide supplemental oxygen, as a medical treatment. On 6/5/2022 at 2:00 p.m. observation of Resident # 66's, Oxygen per nasal cannula, upon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a supplement was administered to a resident as ordered. This was found to be evident for 1 out 8 of residents (Resident #49) reviewed during medication order reconciliation. The findings include: During observation rounds on 6/7/22 at 9:45 am Resident #49 was noted with a Magic Cup nourishment on his/her bedside table. The nourishment was dated 6/6/22 HS (hour of sleep). A review of Resident #49's medical record on 6/7/22 at 10:00 am revealed a physician order dated 11/29/21 for Magic Cup three times a day for weight loss with breakfast, lunch, and dinner. A review of the Medication Administration Record on 6/7/22 at 10:15 am revealed the Magic Cup was signed off as being administered at 1700 (5:00 pm) and the resident had consumed 100% of the nourishment. During interview with Registered Nurse (RN) #8 on 6/7/22 at 10:15 am she stated the nourishment comes from the kitchen and must be documented every meal. Surveyor then reviewed the concern that the documentation reveals…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview it was determined the facility staff failed to ensure that pharmacist recommendations were acted upon and documented in the resident's medical record. This was evident for 2 of 3 (#13, #15) residents reviewed for drug regimen review. The findings include: Medication Regimen Review (MRR) or Drug Regimen Review is a thorough evaluation of the medication regimen of a resident with the goal of promoting positive outcomes and minimizing adverse consequences and potential risks associated with medication. The MRR includes review of the medical record in order to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities. 1) Resident #13's medical record was reviewed on 8/26/2022 at 9:50 AM and revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Monthly medication regimen review was not readily found in Resident #13's medical record. At 10:25 AM on 8/26/2022, the Director of Nursing (DON) was asked to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to properly label and store residents' medications in accordance with currently accepted professional principles. This was observed in 2 of the 2 medication storage rooms within the facility. The findings include: On [DATE] at 9:21 am while checking the second-floor medication storage room the surveyor noted the following observations: Acetaminophen Suppositories in the refrigerator without a patient label, stored Hydrocortisone Suppositories for Resident #37 that expired on [DATE], and Hydrocortisone AC suppositories that expired on [DATE]. Also, there was an open and un-dated insulin pen for a resident who was no longer in the facility in a bag labeled with name for of a third discharged resident's name. There were four large bags of medications for residents who were no longer at the facility. On [DATE] 10:02 during an interview with Unit Manager #23 she made the surveyor aware the staff is supposed to medications of discharged…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-06-23 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to provide laboratory services to residents (Resident #79). This was evident for 1 of 1 resident investigated for laboratory services in the facility's annual survey. The findings include: On 6/6/22 at 1:30 pm, the surveyor conducted a family interview with the family of Resident #79. A family member alleged that the facility failed to provide laboratory results for ordered laboratory tests in the month of May 2022. The surveyor reviewed Resident #79's medical record on 6/6/22 at 3:00 pm. The review revealed that laboratory test were pending from 5/18/22. The surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing on 06/10/22 at 9:21 am regarding the process for requesting laboratory test. The Director of Nursing explained that the provider issues orders for laboratory work. The facility request laboratory staff to draw blood work through the interface with the laboratory provider. The Director of Nursing admitted that the facility staff did not know how to properly order laboratory staff to draw resident blood work. The Director of Nursing stated that the staff was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-06-23 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
The facility failed to maintain updated and accurate records including there facility matrix, a record of medical orders for treatment (Resident #75), and emergency contact information for residents (#356). This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents. The finding include: 1. On 6/5/22 at 8:30 am, the survey team leader requested a matrix of all current residents. The facility matrix is used to identify pertinent care categories for newly admitted residents in the last 30 days and all other residents. The Administrator provided a copy of the facility matrix on 6/5/22 at 11:00 am. On 6/6/22 at 7:30 am, the survey team reconciled the facility's matrix with their observation from the tour the previous day and determined that the matrix did not align with their observations. On 6/6/22 at 10:00 am, the survey Team Leader informed the Administrator that the matrix was inaccurate. On 6/7/22 at 10:00 am, the Administrator provided an updated matrix. 2. A review of Resident #75's medical records on 6/8/22 at 2:11 pm revealed the resident receives dialysis through a third…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-04-17 · tag F0641 — patternEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with the facility staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments accurately reflected the resident's status as evidenced by failure to: 1a) assess the resident's Functional Status; b) Bowel and Bladder status; c) Medication Usage for antipsychotic gradual dose reduction and 2) Medication usage for antibiotic use. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 32 residents (Resident #28 and #57) reviewed during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) is a federally-mandated assessment tool used by nursing home staff to gather information on each resident's strengths and needs. The MDS provides a comprehensive assessment of the resident's functional capabilities and helps nursing home staff identify health problems. It is designed to collect the minimum amount of data to guide care planning and monitoring for residents in long-term care settings. MDS assessments need to be accurate to ensure each resident receives the care they need. 1a) On 4/10/19…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-04-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — patternDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to consistently ensure an interdisciplinary team, which included the resident, unit nurse manager, a geriatric nursing assistant and the physician or nurse practitioner contributed to the resident's care plan and failed to ensure care plans were updated and revised as needed as evidenced by failure to update care plans in relation to: 1) the use of a urinary catheter; 2) development of a pressure ulcer and the need for intravenous hydration. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 32 residents (Resident #28, #90) reviewed for care planning during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: A care plan is a guide that addresses the unique needs of each resident. It is used to plan, assess and evaluate the effectiveness of the resident's care. 1) During an interview with Resident #28 on 4/10/19 the surveyor asked why he/she had a Foley catheter also call urethral catheter. The resident replied, I don't think I can go to the bathroom without it, the resident also revealed that one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-04-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, interview and observation it was determined that the facility failed to provide care in accordance with professional standards of practice as evidenced by the failure to: 1a) ensure nursing assessments were completed as ordered by physician; 1b) provide physician ordered flushes of a intravenous line to maintain patency 1c) complete dressing changes as ordered to an intravenous line; 1d) address possible swallowing issues; 2a) to ensure an antibiotic to treat a wound infection was administered as needed; 2b) to ensure dressing changes for a chronic non-pressure wound were completed as needed; 2c) to ensure blood sugars were monitored as ordered; and 2d) to administer insulin as ordered; 3) to administer pain medication available in the interim box; 4) to ensure assessment and accurate documentation of resident respiratory status and oxygen usage and 5) to maintain and complete incident reports and investigations into falls; 6) update a hospice care plan to reflect discontinuation of hospice services. This was found to be evident for 6 out of 32…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-04-17 · tag F0742 — patternProvide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical records review and interview with the facility staff, the facility failed to ensure when a resident was verbalizing feelings of depression the facility clarified which behavioral health recommendations to follow when two treating behavioral health physicians wrote conflicting orders for the resident. This was true for 1 out of 1 resident (Resident #28) reviewed in the investigation portion of the survey. The findings include: On 4/17/19 Resident #28's medical records were reviewed and revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in June 2018 for rehabilitation and with diagnoses which included anxiety disorder, and major depression. Review of a note dated June 2018 from Behavioral Health Psychiatrist (Staff #38) services revealed: Thought Content: Negative about her/his-self, Mood: Depressive. Medical intervention; Increase Zoloft (medication used to treat depression) to 150 mg (milligram) daily. In August 2018 the Psychiatrist Staff #38 followed up on resident's depression. It revealed the following: Reports feeling sad, and depressed. Medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-04-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to identify that the wrong dosage of medication was being discontinued which caused the resident to receive a lower dose of a medication that was being used to treat continued depression. This was evident for 1 out of 7 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for unnecessary medication review. The findings include: Resident #28's medical records were reviewed on 4/17/19 and revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility in June 2018 for rehabilitation and diagnoses that included anxiety disorder and major depression. In June 2019 the resident was examined by psychiatrist (Staff #38), and documentation review of the visit revealed that the resident was having negative thoughts about his/herself and was feeling depressed. The physician increased the resident Zoloft (medication used to treat depression) to 150 milligram (mg) every day. The Psychiatrist #38 followed-up with the resident in August 2018. The resident revealed to the psychiatrist he/she was still having feelings of sadness…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of resident council meeting minutes and interview with residents and facility staff, it was determined the facility failed to give adequate responses to grievances that were presented by the resident council. This was found to be evident during a resident council meeting, and a review of the resident council meeting minutes that was completed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: Resident Council is a group of residents that meets regularly the on behalf of all residents in the facility to discuss and offer suggestions about facility policies and procedures affecting residents' care, treatment, and quality of life. Facility staff are required to consider residents' views and act upon grievances and recommendations. Facility staff must consider these recommendations and attempt to accommodate them, to the extent practicable. The survey team conducted a resident council meeting on 4/10/19 at 2:30 PM. There were six residents (Resident's #18, #63, #72, #74, #101 and #110) in attendance and represented the first and second floor, of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on administrative record review, medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to notify the resident representative of a treatment change for a resident with a pressure ulcer. This was found to be evident for 1 of 7 complaints (Resident #164) reviewed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: Complaint # MD00134417 was reviewed on 4/9/19 through 4/15/19 during the facility's annual Medicare/ Medicaid survey. Resident #164's family alleged the facility did not notify the family of a pressure ulcer or change in the resident condition. Upon medical record review on 4/10/19, it was noted that Resident #164 was admitted to the facility with a pressure ulcer to the coccyx (buttock) area. In an interview with the complainant on 4/11/19 at 3:24 PM, s/he stated that the family was unaware of the resident pressure ulcer and that the resident did not have one when admitted to the facility. The complainant went on to say that when the family visited Resident #164, they saw the facility staff treating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff and residents, it was determined the facility failed to ensure that residents can submit grievances without fear of reprisal. This was found to be evident for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #101) that attended the resident council meeting conducted during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: The state surveyors conducted a resident council meeting on 4/10/19 at 2:30 PM. There were six residents who attended the meeting. The question was asked, can you file a grievance without fear that someone will get back at you? All the residents responded, no. The residents stated that the staff display attitudes if you complain about them. The residents explained the call bells will be ignored, and the staff will delay bringing them their water. One of the residents went on to explain that s/he complained to a male nurse on one occasion and when s/he requested a gown the GNA came into the room and slung the gown at him/her. The resident was unable to provide a name of the GNA. The Administrator was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-17 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have a system in place to ensure the resident, or their responsible party, received written notification of a transfer to the hospital, including appeal rights and ombudsman contact information. This was found to be evident for 2 out of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization (Resident #30 and #164). The findings include: 1) On 4/15/19 review of Resident #30's medical record revealed the resident had been originally admitted to the facility in 2018. The resident was discharged from the facility to the hospital in January 2019. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation that a notice regarding the transfer had been provided to the resident or the resident's responsible party. On 4/15/19 at 5:26 PM the Administrator confirmed that they currently do not have a process in place to provide the required transfer information. The concern regarding the failure to have a system in place to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the development of a baseline care plan that included instructions needed to provide effective and person centered care within 48 hours of admission. This was found to be evident for 1 out of the 32 residents (Resident #172) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: On 4/12/19 review of Resident #172's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included kidney failure, dementia, heart failure, diabetes and a history of falling. Further review revealed a physician order, dated 4/9/19 for swallowing precautions which included providing oral care before and after meals, remaining upright for 30 minutes after eating and to provide small bites of food and small sips of liquid. On 4/12/19 review of the care plan section of the electronic health record revealed a plan, initiated 4/10/19, addressing nutritional problem or potential…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility to ensure comprehensive care plans were developed for residents as evidenced by failure to address: 1) a non-pressure chronic ulcer; and 2) the use of an indwelling Foley urinary catheter 3) revision of a care plan after treatment discontinuation. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 32 residents (Resident #171, #266 and #83) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #171's medical record revealed the resident was admitted in March 2019 with a diagnoses that included, but not limited to, diabetes, high blood pressure and a non-pressure chronic ulcer (wound) of the left lower leg which had an infection. Review of the primary care physician's admission note revealed a plan to address the resident's left leg cellulitis (skin infection) by continuing doxycyline 100 mg twice a day for 2 more weeks. The resident was seen by the wound physician on 3/26/19, review of the note from this visit revealed a plan for daily silvadene dressings. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to provide individualized activities for residents and failed to assist resident's to group activities. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 3 residents (Resident #315, #4 and #71) reviewed for activities during the facility's annual Medicare/ Medicaid survey. The findings include: 1) Observations were made on 4/10/19 at 12:26 PM, 4/11/19 at 11:00 AM and 4/12/19 at 1:45 PM and Resident #315 was in his/her room. There were no activities observed taking place with the resident. An interview was conducted with Activity Representative (#18) on 4/17/19 at 10:10 AM and s/he was made aware Resident #315 was observed multiple times and was not involved in activities. Staff #18 stated there is a book that is kept on the unit that has specific one on one activities done with each resident. On 4/17/19 at 11:45 AM Staff #18 submitted a book that contained a form titled Activity Attendance Log. Review of the activity log revealed that there were no activities documented for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure safety precautions were communicated to staff providing care for a resident. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 6 residents (Resident #172) reviewed for accidents during the survey. The findings include: On 4/12/19 review of Resident #172's medical record revealed diagnoses that included kidney failure, dementia, heart failure, diabetes and a history of falling. Further review revealed a physician order, dated 4/9/19 for swallowing precautions which included providing oral care before and after meals, remaining upright for 30 minutes after eating and to provide small bites of food and small sips of liquid. On 4/12/19 review of the care plans revealed a plan, initiated 4/10/19, addressing nutritional problem or potential nutritional problem r/t therapeutic diet; altered consistency diet; abnormal nutrition-related labs (elevated HgbA1c), diuretic therapy; dysphagia (difficulty swallowing); dx of CHF…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, observation and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure supplements were administered to residents as ordered. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 32 residents (Resident #71, #30 and #165). The findings include: 1) On 4/12/19 review of Resident #71's medical record revealed the resident was admitted in March 2019 after a hospitalization for a fracture. Review of the 3/8/19 Nutrition Risk Assessment revealed a recommendation: Ensure Plus BID [twice a day] for additional 700 calories and 26 grams of protein. A corresponding physician order for the Ensure Plus two times a day was also found but had been discontinued. A 4/4/19 dietician note revealed the resident had a significant weight loss over the past month and recommended an increase in the Ensure Plus to three times a day. A corresponding physician order for the Ensure Plus three times a day was also found. Further review of the medical record failed to reveal any documentation that either nursing or geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) had been administering the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure pain medication was administered in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 1 out of 4 residents (Resident #167) reviewed for pain management. The findings include: On 4/17/19 review of Resident #167's medical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November 2018 for rehabilitation and with diagnoses that included lumbar radiculopathy (a painful condition that happens when a nerve in your lumbar spine (lower back) is pinched or irritated) and leg pain. Further review of the medical records revealed that the resident arrived at the facility approximately 8:00 PM and a pain assessment was completed at that time. It revealed the intensity of the pain was moderate. Further review of the pain assessment revealed that on a score of 1-5 the pain level was at a 4. Review of the emergency medication supply list revealed that it contains oxycodone 15 milligram. It further revealed that the pharmacy must be contacted for authorization number prior to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews with residents, review of resident council meeting minutes and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to have adequate staff to ensure that response to call lights were timely and that staff provided care assistance requested by the resident in a timely manner. This was found to be evident for 6 out of 6 resident council members (Resident # 18, #63, #72, #74, #101 and #110) interviewed during the survey. The findings include: Review of resident council meeting minutes on 4/10/19 revealed concerns from residents of call lights not being answered as follows: -The meeting minutes for July 25, 2018 revealed residents reported call lights are not being answered between 2-5 AM. -The meeting minutes for August 15, 2018 revealed call lights are not being answered and that there was a 2 hour wait for call bell response during the day. -The meeting minutes for October 17, 2018 revealed that on 11-7 shift staff are not answering call bells in a timely manner. -The meeting minutes for November 6, 2018 revealed residents complained there was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records and employee files and interviews it was determined that the facility failed to ensure skills competency was demonstrated by newly hired nurses and geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) prior to being allowed to work independently with residents. This was found to be evident for 3 out of 3 GNAs (#15, #16, and #17) and 2 out of 2 nurses (#34 and #32) reviewed for new hire skills competency during the survey. The findings include: 1) On 4/16/19 review of GNA #15, #16, and #17's employee files revealed all three had been hired between 1/27/19 and 2/17/19. Further review of the employee files failed to reveal any documentation of a skills evaluation having been conducted after hire. On 4/16/19 at 1:01 PM the Administrator confirmed that there was no official system in place to assess the GNAs competency prior to being allowed to work independently with residents. The Administrator later presented with blank skills checklist forms for nurses and GNAs that could be used. 2) Review of complaint MD00135012 revealed Resident #165's nurse on 12/21/18 was Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0730 — isolatedObserve each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on review of employee information and interview it was determined that the facility failed to ensure annual evaluations were being completed for nursing staff. This was found to be evident for all nursing and geriatric nursing assistants (GNA) having worked at the facility for more than a year and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: On 4/17/19 a review of a list of current nursing and GNA staff revealed many staff with a hire date of 2017 or before. At 10:19 AM the Corporate Regional Director of Operations (#37) reported that when [name of current corporate owners] took over they rehired the staff but maintained their years of service from the original hire date. The regional director went on to confirm that no annual evaluations had been completed because we haven't observed for a year. Surveyor then addressed the concern with the regional director and the Administrator that they were operating under the same provider number as the previous owners, have many of the same staff and the regulation requires an annual evaluation of the GNAs.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of medical records and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to have an effective system in place to ensure pharmacist recommendations resulting from identified irregularities during the monthly pharmacy review were addressed and acted on by the physician as evidenced by failure to address recommendation for gradual dose reduction and failure to identify missed lab test for diabetes monitoring and failure to include required components in the medication regime review policy. This was found to be evident for 2 out of the 5 residents (Resident #28 and #20) sampled for medication regimen review during the investigative stage of the survey. The findings include: 1) On 4/17/19 Resident #28's medical records were reviewed and revealed that on July 26, 2018, September 20, 2018 and October 24, 2018, a pharmacist completed the required monthly medication review. This review found irregularities with the resident medication and recommendations were made. The July 2018 pharmacy recommendation revealed: 1. Please attempt a gradual dose reduction if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with facility staff it was determined that the facility staff failed to adequately monitor the use of antipsychotic medications used to treat a resident's behavior. This was evident for 1 out of 5 residents (Resident #28) reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. The findings include: Antipsychotics should only be used in accordance with relevant current standards of practice and for specific target behaviors that present a danger to self or others. On 4/17/19 Resident #28's medical records were reviewed. This review revealed a physician order for Clonazepam, Seroquel, Risperdal, Trazadone and Zoloft. Further review of the physician orders reveal that the resident was taking Clonazepam for anxiety, Trazadone and Zoloft for depression and the physician wrote Seroquel and Risperdal for personality disorder. Review of the medication administration records (MAR) reveal generalized behaviors not individualized or specific to the resident identified behaviors. On 4/17/19 during an interview with Nurse (#21) the surveyor asked her if…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, interview and observation it was determined that the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and accounted for as evidenced by observation of a physician prescribed antibiotic cream being stored in a resident's dresser drawer and nursing staff failure to sign off the administration of a narcotic on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) and the Controlled Substances Record. This was found to be evident during a dressing change observation (Resident #171) and an observation of narcotic count between shifts and has the potential to affect all residents. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #171's medical record revealed the resident was admitted in March 2019 with a diagnoses that included but not limited to diabetes, high blood pressure and a non-pressure chronic ulcer [wound] of the left lower leg which had an infection. On 4/12/19 during a dressing change observation the resident reported that there was medicated lotion in the dresser drawer. Surveyor observed the nurse remove a bag with a tube of Mupirocin Ointment from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations it was determined the facility failed to consistently maintain a sanitary environment in the kitchen based on 2 random observations. This has the potential to affect any resident who consumes food from the kitchen. The findings include: Observation on 4/9/19 at 8:28 AM of the Kitchen Staff #13 was observed with her hair out of the hair net while preparing food on the tray line. She was made aware that her hair was out during the tray line and asked someone else to tuck her hair up. Surveyor notified the Kitchen General Manager (Staff #4) at 8:30 AM on 4/9/19 of the observations. On 4/11/19 at 8:00 AM surveyor entered kitchen to request a test tray. The kitchen general manager (#4) was observed at the tray line with no hair net on. He was asked where his hair net was. He proceeded to his office, placed his hat on and stated that he was just checking on a few orders. At 1:46 PM on 4/11/19 the combined observations from 4/9/19 and 4/11/19 of the dietary staff and the Kitchen General Manager #4 were reviewed with the Kitchen General Manager #4 again and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-04-17 · tag F0840 — isolatedEmploy or obtain outside professional resources to provide services in the nursing home when the facility does not employ a qualified professional to furnish a required service.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interviews with facility staff it was determined the facility failed to provide services from an outside source to a resident with a pressure ulcer that required ongoing care and treatment. This was found to be evident for 1 of 7 complaints (Resident #164) reviewed during the facility's annual Medicare/Medicaid survey. The findings include: Review of intake #MD00134417 in which the family alleged the resident acquired a stage 2 pressure ulcer to buttocks and the facility did not notify the family of the wound or change in condition. Medical record review conducted on 4/9/19 revealed a nurse admission assessment completed on 11/14/18 for Resident #164 indicated a pressure area to coccyx (bottom portion of the spine below the sacrum). Review of wound documentation forms presented to the survey team failed to have measurements of the wound that was identified upon the resident's admission. Further review of wound documentation forms revealed that on 11/27/18 measurements obtained…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-04-17 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review and interview with staff it was determined that the facility failed to ensure documentation of specialist assessments were available in the medical record for review by other health care professionals. This was found to be evident for 3 out of the 32 residents (Resident #165, #171 and #20) reviewed during the investigative portion of the survey. The findings include: 1) Review of Resident #165's medical record revealed a psych nurse practitioner (NP) (Staff #25) note, dated 11/27/18 that revealed the resident was refusing antidepressant medications and that the nurse practitioner intended to follow-up with the resident the following week to re-evaluate if patient will agree to anti-depressants. Further review of the medical record revealed a nursing note, dated 12/12/18 at 12:16 AM that revealed the following: resident seen by the psych practitioner today and the resident is to start zoloft 50 mg po [by mouth] daily for depression. A corresponding physician order dated 12/12/18 was also found. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$11,452 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $11,452 — penalty dated 2025-06-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 4 of 5 | 3.0 | +1.0 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 3 of 5 | 2.6 | +0.4 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YR 2013 INVESTMENT TR UA 03252013 | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 23% | since 07/01/2018 |
| CIBC BANK USA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| ALEXANDER, EILEEN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/25/2022 |
| GUNTHORPE, JAHIRI | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| HARMAN, DINA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| VIROJA, YOGESH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| POSEN, MINDEE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| MARQUIS LIMITED LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/21/2025 |
| NUTRACO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/26/2025 |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| BASKARAN, DEEPAK | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2018 |
| FLAGLER, OSHER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| KAHANOW, AVIVA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| KOHN, SARA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| KOHN, SEAN | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| ROKEACH, FRAIDE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| ROKOWSKY, YITZCHOK | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/25/2025 |
| MEADOW PARK PROPERTY LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2018 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MD
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Maryland Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 215347. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.