Tuckerman Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

65.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 462 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 73.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.33 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 55% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 30% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 41 beds and averages 34.3 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 7 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.84 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.13 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.51 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.98 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.25 to 0.83 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 36% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 5 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-11-05 · tag F0627 — pattern
  Ensure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility discharged a resident without an appropriate reason and failed to appropriately document the discharge of a resident. This was evident for 2 (#3 and #4) of 2 residents reviewed for an inappropriate discharge. The findings include:Hospice care - focuses on the care, comfort, and quality of life of a person with a serious illness who is approaching the end of life. It is a service covered under Medicare Part A, but if a resident is in a nursing facility, they may have to pay room and board. Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) is issued to a resident when their Medicare Part A coverage is going to end. Medicare Part A designates a certain number of days it will cover a stay in a nursing home. Advanced Beneficiary Notice (ABN) is issued to a resident when services they are receiving will not be covered by Medicare any longer. Such as, therapy services. 1. A medical record review for Resident #3 on 10/28/25 at 9:44 AM revealed a discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-05 · tag F0628 — pattern
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to issue a 30-day notice to residents when they planned to discharge them. This was evident for 2 (#3 and #4) of 2 residents reviewed for an inappropriate discharge. The findings include:Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) is issued to a resident when their Medicare Part A coverage is going to end. Medicare Part A designates a certain number of days it will cover a stay in a nursing home. 1. A medical record review for Resident #3 on 10/28/25 at 9:44 AM revealed the Social Services Director (SSD) wrote on 6/16/25 that she attempted to issue a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) with the last date of coverage as 6/18/25 and a discharge date of 6/19/25. She noted the family declined to sign it, and she explained to them that the resident cannot be in hospice care at the facility. (A NOMNC was not required for a resident who was choosing hospice care because these services were covered by Medicare, but the resident's room and board may not be covered). Further review of the medical record failed to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0551 — isolated
  Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to honor the wishes of the resident representative and allow the resident to stay at the facility while receiving hospice services. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge. The findings include:An interview with Resident #3's representative (RR) on 10/30/25 at 1:39 PM revealed that they were informed by the Social Services Director (SSD) the facility wanted to discharge the resident because they were unable to provide hospice services at the facility. The RR reported that s/he told facility staff they wanted the resident to stay at the facility and receive hospice care instead of taking the resident home. The RR reported that it was after they appealed the discharge two times, attempted to find another nursing home but were denied because of the wound care, and feeling pressured by facility staff to take the resident home; they finally took the resident home. A medical record review on 10/28/25 at 9:44 AM revealed a progress note dated 6/18/25 written by the SSD, that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that facility staff failed to ensure that residents were free of chemical restraints and that PRN (as needed medications) psychotropics were limited to 14 days. This was evident for 1 (#4) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge. The findings include:A review of the transferring facility's medication list for Resident #4 on 11/4/25 at 11:00 AM revealed the resident was on quetiapine (an antipsychotic medication) for sundowning since 3/12/25 and lorazepam as needed every 8 hours for anxiety since 5/16/25. A medical record review on 10/30/25 at 11:40 AM for Resident #4 revealed a an informed consent form for use of psychotropic (mind altering drugs to include antipsychotics and antianxiety medications) medications that documented the resident was on quetiapine and lorazepam because all nonpharmacological approaches had been attempted with no alleviation of the symptoms, however this form was signed on the day the resident was admitted to the facility. A review of the physician's orders revealed an order for lorazepam 0.5 mg tablet…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-05 · tag F0620 — isolated
  Not require residents to give up Medicare or Medicaid benefits, or pay privately as a condition of admission; and must tell residents what care they do not provide.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to inform residents and/or resident representatives about limitations in the care services that they provided. This was evident for 1 (#3) of 2 residents reviewed for discharge.The findings include:Hospice care - focuses on the care, comfort, and quality of life of a person with a serious illness who is approaching the end of life. On 11/3/25 at 2:15 PM a review of the facility admission packet, that was signed by Resident #3, was conducted. In section 2, care and services, ancillary it read that hospice services were provided. In section 3, transfers and discharges it read that resident will not be discharged unless the following criteria which did not include the need for hospice care or long-term care. In addition, the section regarding Medicaid coverage read, the facility participated in the Medicaid program and had a provider agreement with the state. There was no indication that there were limited services provided by the facility. A medical record review 10/28/25 at 9:44 AM revealed the discharge…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation was completed for allegations of abuse. This was found to be evident for 2 (Resident #189 & 180) out of 8 Residents investigated for abuse during the recertification and complaint survey. The findings include: A review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MD00183205 conducted on 04/24/25 at 9:07 AM revealed an allegation of abuse for Resident #189. The facility investigated the allegation of abuse, however failed to interview staff and obtain statements. During an interview conducted on 04/24/2025 at 10:19 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reviewed the facility ' s investigation and confirmed the investigation did not include staff interviews and statements. The DON further stated that he would look for staff statements and would follow up. The DON returned on 04/24/2025 at 12:03 PM and advised this surveyor that he was unable to locate staff interviews and statements. A review of the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) MD00181282 conducted on 04/25 /25 at 7:05 AM…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2021-02-25 · tag F0773 — isolated
  Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility's staff failed to promptly notify the ordering physician of laboratory results for 1 of 5 residents selected for review of Unnecessary Medications during the survey (Resident #122). The findings include: On 02-24-2021, review of Resident #122 physician's orders revealed that the primary doctor ordered a thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) test on 02-12-2021. Further record review revealed a lab report dated 02-13-2021 that documented the TSH result was pending. On 02-24-2021 at 3:00 PM, surveyor interviewed the Director of Nursing (DON) about the pending TSH result and she said she would follow up. On 02-24-2021 at 4:07 PM, the DON provided the TSH result that was reported by the lab on 02-16-2021 with a result of 8.37 (H) which was out of reference range (0.35-5.50 uIU/mL). Further interview revealed the staff didn't notify the physician of the results until after surveyor inquired about the results on 02-24-2021.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2019-07-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility staff failed to store and serve food under sanitary conditions. This finding was evident in the facility's kitchen, dining room and passing of trays during Lunch observation. The findings include: 1. On 07-01-19 at 09:01 AM, surveyor tour of the kitchen revealed the following: A. Rotting lemons in a hard carton box among other non-spoiled lemons, middle shelf of walk-in refrigerator. B. Unlabeled one bag of carrots and 2 bags of bread, upper shelf and middle shelf of walk-in refrigerator C. Uncovered one bag of salad, middle shelf of walk-in refrigerator. D. Open and unlabeled one pack of frozen chicken and one pack of frozen burgers, middle shelf freezer room. E. Unlabeled and loosely covered with paper towel one strawberry cake, middle shelf freezer room. F. Three cartridges labeled Butane sitting next to food, middle shelf dry area food. On 07-01-19 at 09: 20AM, surveyor interview with the Dietary Manager revealed no further information. 2. On 07-01-19 at 12:20 PM surveyor observed facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-07-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview and record review, it was determined that facility staff failed to provide timely treatment and care. This was evident for 1 of 17 residents selected to review during the survey (#77). The findings include: On 07-01-19 at 10:30 AM, surveyor interview of resident #77 revealed that he/she was having a burning sensation on urination. Resident #77 was alert and oriented to self, time, place and situation. Resident #77 said he/she had not informed nursing staff or physician about it. However, resident #77 said he/she will talk to staff about his/her condition. On 07-02-19 10:54 AM, surveyor interview with resident #77 revealed that the burning sensation on urination had gotten worse and he/she talked to the evening nursing staff the night before. On 07-02-19 10:32 AM, surveyor interview with staff #2 revealed that resident #77 had not complained of burning on urination and was afebrile. Staff #2 said she/he did not get any report on the resident's condition from the previous shift nursing staff. Staff #2 said he/she will talk to resident #77…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2019-07-03 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolated
  Keep all essential equipment working safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation and interview of facility staff, it was determined that the facility staff failed to inspect and maintain an electrically powered air mattress in safe operating condition. This finding was evident for 1 of 17 residents selected for review during the survey (#19). The findings include: On 07-01-19 at 1PM, surveyor observation revealed that resident # 19 was laying on an electrically powered air mattress. However, the mattress on the bed was deflated. Surveyor made staff #1 aware. He/she unplugged the mattress power cord and plugged it back in the same wall plug. He/she said it was fixed. Surveyor saw on/off switch in the mattress had light on which indicates electrical power is on. Surveyor noted that the mattress was re-inflated. On 07-02-19, at 9AM, surveyor observed resident #19 laying on the deflated mattress again. Surveyor observed mattress power cord was plugged in wall plug but the on/off switch in the mattress had no light on which indicated that the electrical power was off. Surveyor made the Director of Nursing (DON) aware. The DON came to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $491K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MD