Westgate Center For Rehab & Alzheimers Care

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

51.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 40 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 53.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 45% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 12% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 65 beds and averages 63.1 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 2 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 4.17 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 1.27 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.91 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 4.02 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.24 on weekdays — 5% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 1.36 to 1.04 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 23% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 8 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to adequately provide housekeeping services necessary to maintain an environment free from offensive odors for 3 of 3 days of survey (5/11/26 through 5/13/26) on the locked Acadia Unit.Findings:On 5/11/26 at 11 a.m. and 12:56 p.m., upon entering the locked dementia/Alzheimer's Acadia Unit, a strong, foul urine odor was observed and it lingered throughout the unit.On 5/12/26 at 7:30 a.m., 11:55 a.m. and 2:00 p.m., upon entering the Acadia Unit, a strong foul urine odor was observed and it lingered throughout the unit. On 5/13/26 at 9 a.m., and 1p.m., upon entering the Acadia Unit, a strong foul urine odor was observed and it lingered throughout the unit. On 5/13/26 at 1:10 p.m., in an interview with the Acadia Unit RN-Charge Nurse, she stated the Unit does have a strong odor. They open windows when they can; housekeeping cleans daily and they have air freshener sprays.On 5/13/26 at approximately 1:35 p.m., in an interview with the Director of Nursing Services, the surveyor discussed the above findings.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to ensure a care plan was updated and implemented for 2 of 14 residents reviewed on survey (Resident #3 [R3] and R9). Findings: 1. On [DATE], R3's clinical record was reviewed and indicated the following: -On [DATE], a provider order indicated, Do Not Resuscitate [Do not perform Cardio-Pulmonary Resuscitation (CPR)]. Review of the Care Plan indicated a code status of Full Code (Perform CPR), dated [DATE]. -On [DATE], a provider order indicated, change code status to DNR only not CPR or DNI one time a day. Review of the Care plan indicated a code status of Full Code (Perform CPR), dated [DATE]. -On [DATE], a provider order indicated, NovoLOG FlexPen Subcutaneous Solution Peninjector 100 UNIT/[milliliter (ML)] (Insulin Aspart) Inject as per sliding scale: if 0 - 299 = 0; 300 - 500 = 5, subcutaneously before meals and at bedtime for [Diabetes Mellitus (DMII)]. The care plan does not address R3's insulin orders including goals and interventions for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-05-13 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — pattern
  Ensure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure a duplicate order was removed from an electronic Medication Administration Record which resulted in the resident receiving duplicate doses of the same medication for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications (Resident #10 [R10])Finding:On 5/13/2026 at 12:59 p.m. during a clinical record review R10's signed physician orders dated 4/23/26 indicated that R10 had an order for Senna oral tablet 8.6 milligrams (mg) give 2 tablets by mouth two times a day for constipation hold for loose stools. Review of R10's electronic Medication administration record (MAR) shows that since 3/26/26 R10 has been receiving two separate doses of Senna. On 3/26/26 a second order was entered onto the MAR and R10 received Senna 8.6mg, 2 tablets at 8:00 p.m. and senna docusate sodium (senna-s) 8.6-50 mg 2 tablets at 8:00 p.m. From the date 3/27/26 to 5/13/26 R10 has received both medications twice daily.On 5/13/26 during an interview with the Assistant Director of nursing services (ADNS), she was not able to identify the reason the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-05-13 · tag F0711 — isolated
  Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interview, the facility failed to ensure the attending Provider signed the medication Order Review History Report (Physician block orders) that is required during a visit at least every 60 days plus a 10 day grace period for 1 of 5 sampled residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. (Resident #40 [R40]Finding: 1. On 5/13/26, a review of R40's clinical record was completed. Documentation indicated a required regulatory visit was completed on 4/30/26. A provider progress note was completed on 4/30/26, but there was no evidence that the physician block orders were signed until a day later on 5/1/26. The facility was unable to provide evidence that the physician block orders were signed on the day of the required recertification visit. On 5/13/26 at approximately 1:35 p.m., the surveyor discussed and confirmed this finding with the Director of Nursing and the Regional Director of Clinical Operations.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-03-26 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — pattern
  Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests for 1 of 3 units observed for pests (Cascade Unit). Finding: On 3/24/25 a surveyor observed small flies in the following locations: -At 10:20 a.m., a small fly was observed circling over the full recyclable containers bin in the kitchen. -At 10:59 a.m., a small fly was observed in the hall outside resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. -At 11:20 a.m., a small fly was observed on a resident's bedding in room [ROOM NUMBER] and another small fly was observed in the bathroom of room [ROOM NUMBER]. -At 11:35 a.m., a small fly was observed flying in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 3/25/25 a surveyor observed small flies in the following locations: -At 9:28 a.m., a small fly was observed flying in resident room [ROOM NUMBER]. -At 11:30 a.m., a small fly was observed circling the trash in the dining room during the lunch service. -At 2:30 p.m., during an interview with the Food Services…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to protect a resident's right to a dignified existence and right of self-determination for a visitor for 1 of 1 resident's reviewed for Dignity (Resident # 10 [R10]). Finding: 1. On 3/25/25 at 9:10 a.m., a surveyor observed from the resident hallway, R10 lying in his/her bed. R10's pants were below his/her waste with an exposed brief. A wash basin was observed on the bedside table and R10 was talking with a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA). After the surveyor knocked on the open door and introduced self, the CNA made 2 attempts to close the door and prevent communication with the resident. The resident provided consent for the surveyor to enter and observe care. On 3/26/25 at 12:00 p.m., during an interview with the Director of Nursing, the surveyor confirmed that R10's right to privacy and self-determination for a visitor was not protected. 2. On 3/25/25 at 9:18 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor and R10, CNA1 and CNA2 entered R10's room and explained to the surveyor that R10's family took the shoes home, that R10…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to implement a resident's care plan in the area a restorative walking program for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for activities of daily living (Resident #10 [R10]). Finding: On 3/25/25 at 9:35 a.m., during an interview with a surveyor, R10 stated he/she is losing his/her ability to walk. R10 stated, I don't think anyone walked with me after therapy [ended]. I think I am a blind spot. On 3/26/25 at 10:40 a.m., a surveyor observed R10 ambulating in the hallway with Physical Therapy (PT) staff. PT stated nursing notified her of a decline in function and R10 has had several falls prompting her to conduct today's evaluation. On 3/26/25, R10's clinical record was reviewed. The care plan identified R10 as having a functional mobility deficit, for which the intervention AMBULATION: [R10] will ambulate 50-75 feet with 2 wheel walker and extensive assist, as patient is able, last revised on 3/12/25. On 3/26/25 at 12:19 p.m., during an interview with a surveyor and the Director of Nursing (DON), R10's clinical records was reviewed. The DON…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record reviews and interviews, the facility failed to complete neurological assessments for a resident who had a fall and hit their head, failed to follow their Bowel Regimen, and failed to follow physician orders for 3 of 18 residents reviewed (Resident #3 [R3], R48, and R6). Findings: 1. On 3/25/25 at 8:47 a.m., R3's clinical record was reviewed. On 3/20/25 at 12:37 p.m., a health status note from Third eye Health with a date of service of 6:04 a.m. it was documented that R3 being seen for an unwitnessed fall that occurred at 5:30 a.m. he/she was found on the floor in their room. R3 has a hematoma to the back of head to left side and reports head pain. Clinical record review shows documentation for Neuro checks that were initiated on 3/21/25 at 1:00 p.m. and lacked evidence that Neuro checks were completed as outlined in their Neurological Evaluation Policy. The facility's Neurological Evaluation Policy dated 4/23 and their neurological (neuro)/vital sign check sheet instructs staff that the licensed nurse performs neurological evaluations whenever there is the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews, the facility failed to ensure that hot water temperatures in resident rooms and restroom did not exceed 120 degrees Fahrenheit (F) on 2 of 3 days of survey (3/24/25 and 3/25/25). Findings: 1. On 3/24/25 between 11:47 a.m. thru 12:36 p.m., surveyors observed the following hot water temperatures: In room [ROOM NUMBER] at 11:49 a.m., the hot water temperature was 121.7 degrees F and at 11:57 a.m. was 120.9 degrees F; In room [ROOM NUMBER] at 11:59 a.m., the hot water temperature was 121.1 F; In room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:07 p.m., the hot water temperature was 124.1 F; In room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:10 p.m., the hot water temperature was 125.0 F; In Cascade Unit Shower/Restroom at 12:25 p.m., the hot water temperature was 125.4 F; In room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:27 p.m., the hot water temperature was 122.3 F; In room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:28 p.m., the hot water temperature was 122.3 F; and In room [ROOM NUMBER] at 12:30 p.m., the hot water temperature was 120.5 F. On 3/24/25 at 12:50 p.m.,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-26 · tag F0730 — isolated
  Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on performance evaluation reviews and interview, the facility failed to complete an annual performance evaluation at least every 12 months for 1 of 5 sampled employees (Certified Nursing Assistant #3 [CNA3]). Finding: CNA3 was hired on 12/20/2012. A review of CNA3's performance evaluation, dated 3/21/23 thru 12/10/24, indicated the evaluation was completed 8 months and 20 days past the 12 month evaluation period. On 3/26/25 at 8:00 a.m., in an interview with the surveyor, the Assistant Director of Nursing, confirmed that CNA3 receive her performance evaluation 8 months and 20 days late.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to NATIONAL HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES — 42 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 37 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 12% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in ME