Allendale Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 248 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 126 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 105.4 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.46 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.01 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.98 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.65 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.28 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

23 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 13 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record reviews, and reviews of facility policies, the facility failed to ensure Infection Control measures were maintained 1. during incontinent care for one resident (Resident (R) 5) of one resident reviewed for incontinent care in a total sample of 29 residents, 2. during separation of clean and soiled laundry, and 3. in a water management program for Legionella bacteria. These failures placed residents at risk of cross-contamination of bacteria and increased health complications.Findings include: 1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of a non-traumatic brain injury. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/29/25 revealed R5 was assessed by staff to be severely impaired in cognition and was incontinent of bowel and bladder. During an observation on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure an abnormal involuntary movement scale (AIMS-a scoring system which uses a 0-4 rating scale for 12 items to assess the severity of the abnormal involuntary movements) was accurate and completed timely for three residents (Residents (R)10, R15, and R4) reviewed in a sample of29 residents. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving care and services related to their psychiatric illnesses.Findings include: 1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a mental health condition characterized by extreme shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, ranging from manic highs to depressive lows), major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0645 — isolated
  PASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure the admission PASARR (Pre-Admssion Screening and Resident Review-a mandatory review prior to admission to screen for mental illness and intellectual disabilities) was accurate for one resident (Resident (R)10) of two residents reviewed for PASARR in a total sample of 29 residents. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving the appropriate mental health services.Findings include:Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included bipolar disorder (a mental health condition characterized by extreme shifts in mood, energy, activity levels, ranging from manic highs to depressive lows), major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the 04/22/25 Level I PASARR located in the Miscellaneous tab of the EMR and completed by the hospital social worker, revealed that in Section II…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure hair washing was provided during showers for one resident (Resident (R) 49) of four residents reviewed for ADLs (Activities of Daily Living) in a total sample of 29 residents. This failure placed the residents at risk of a diminished quality of life.Findings include:Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R49 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia, major depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 10/06/25 revealed R49 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 which indicated R49 was severely impaired in cognition and required moderate assistance with bathing/showering. Review of the 09/29/23 ADL Self Care Performance Care Plan located in the Care Plan tab of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide timely repositioning for one (Resident (R)5) of two residents reviewed for positioning in a total sample of 29 residents. This failure placed the resident at risk of skin breakdown.Findings include:Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included non-traumatic brain injury, aphasia (language disorder caused by damage to the parts of the brain that control language, speech and understanding language), and respiratory failure. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 08/29/25 revealed R5 had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of three out of 15 which indicated R5 was severely impaired in cognition, had no pressure ulcers, and was always incontinent of bowel and bladder. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to utilize the physician ordered hand splints or a hand roll for two of two residents (Residents (R) 5 and R81) reviewed for contractures in a total sample of 29. This failure placed the residents at risk of further decreased range of motion (ROM) and worsening contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, and other tissue, often leading to deformity and rigidity of joints.)Findings include:1. Review of the admission Record located in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis that included a non-traumatic brain injury. Review of the Order Summary located in the Orders tab of the EMR revealed an order dated 08/27/25 to Apply bilateral hand splints for 4 hours twice daily. Review of the significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) located in the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-25 · tag F0700 — isolated
  Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure residents received alternative measures prior to the installation of side rails; documented discussion related to risk versus benefits; and signed informed consent prior to bed rail use for one of four residents (Resident (R)68) reviewed for side rails out of 29 sampled residents. The lack of alternate side rail measures and proper assessment/consent increased the potential for restraint or side rail entrapment. Findings include: Review of R68's admission Record in the Profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of muscle weakness. Review of R68's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment under the MDS tab of the EMR with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 09/16/25 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS), score of eight out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. This MDS revealed that R68 was able to self-transfer. Review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-06-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility policies, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain proper kitchen sanitation practices in a manner to prevent food borne illness. This deficient practice was observed and evidenced by the following: On 6/13/24 at 9:15 AM, the surveyor in the presence of the Food Service Director (FSD) observed the following during the kitchen tour: Upon entering the kitchen the surveyor observed the FSD and Dietary Aide #1 (DA#1) both wearing earrings that hung more than one inch (in) from their earlobes. The FSD acknowledged both she/he and DA#1 were wearing jewelry that was prohibited in the kitchen area. On 6/17/24 at 9:04 AM, the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) provided the surveyor with a kitchen policy titled, Preventing Foodborne Illness - Employee Hygiene and Sanitary Practices, with a revised date of November 2022. Under the policy interpretation and implementation section it states, Fingernails/Jewelry, 17. Jewelry will be kept to a minimum. Hand jewelry and wrist jeweler are covered with gloves…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ#162614 Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to report as required to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH) within two hours an allegation of abuse for one (1) of two (2) residents (Resident #156) reviewed for abuse. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 6/13/24 at 11:20 AM, the surveyor reviewed a Reportable Event Record (RER) for a resident to resident abuse that indicated the RER was submitted to the NJDOH by the facility's Administrator at that time, on 3/20/23. A review of the RER included the following: Today's Date: 3/20/23 Date of Event: 3/18/23 Time of Event: 11:00 PM The section that the facility can document if the incident was a significant event and if the event was called in was blank. Further review of the RER indicated that Resident #156 was hit by an unsampled resident on 3/18/23. On 6/13/24 at 12:30 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) the facility's complete documentation of the RER…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-06-21 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interviews and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to provide the resident or resident representative appropriate written notification of the facility's bed hold and reserve payment policy upon transfer to the hospital for two (2) of two (2) residents (Resident #69 and #85) reviewed for hospitalizations. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. A review of Resident #69's hybrid (combination of paper and electronic) medical record revealed the following: Resident #69's two discharge assessment-return anticipated Minimum Data Set's (DRAMDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care, reflected that the resident was transferred to the hospital. A review of Resident's hybrid medical record did not include a written notification of the facility's bed hold policy to the resident or resident representative (RR) prior to the transfer to the hospital. On 6/14/24 at 10:24 AM, the surveyor interviewed the Business Office Manager (BOM) regarding the facility's written notification of the bed hold policy process. The BOM stated…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 35 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.0M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ