Seacrest Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 494 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 67.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 233 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 171 beds and averages 149.8 residents a day — about 88% occupied, or roughly 21 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.38 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.548 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.82 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.15 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.48 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.60 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

29 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 18 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #'s: NJ428767 and NJ428770Based on record review, interviews and document review, the facility failed to protect one of four residents Resident (R) #5 from an accident hazard. Specifically, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) #1 pushed R5 in a wheelchair without leg rests causing R5's legs to become trapped underneath the wheelchair, which resulted in the fracture of R5's left femur. This failure caused unnecessary pain and resulted in R5 requiring surgery to repair the left femur fracture. Findings include:Review of R5's Face Sheet located under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) indicated R5 was admitted to the facility in 06/2022 with diagnoses of Parkinson's Disease and Alzheimer's Disease. Review of R5's Care Plan Report initiated 07/11/2024 included under Focus: I have an ADL [Activity of Daily Living] Self Care Performance Deficit r/t [related to] Cognitive Impairment, [NAME] process, Impaired Balance. Under Goal' included I will be at reduced risk for complications of self care…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interviews, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain food service and hydration station equipment in a clean and sanitary manner. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/15/25 at 9:35 AM, during a tour of the kitchen with the Food Service Director (FSD), the surveyor observed the following:The top of the steamer was visibly soiled with food debris and splashes. The FSD acknowledged the finding and stated that, per facility policy, the steamer top should be cleaned when visibly soiled. The gas oven was observed with splashes of grease and burnt food particles on interior surfaces. The FSD acknowledged the finding and stated that, per facility policy, the oven should be cleaned when visibly soiledOn 12/16/25 at 8:56 AM, during a tour of the third-floor's hydration station, and nourishment and dining rooms with the Activities Aide (AA), the surveyor observed the following:Review of the temperature log for the nourishment room refrigerator revealed a missing temperature entry and employee initials for the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0641 — isolated
  Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to accurately code the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to guide the planning and management of care for all residents. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 19 residents (Resident #9) reviewed for MDS accuracy and was evidenced by the following:A review of the admission Record (admission summary) reflected that Resident #9 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to; depression and schizoaffective disorder (a serious mental illness blending symptoms of schizophrenia (hallucinations, delusions, disorganized thinking) with those of a mood disorder (depression or mania), where psychotic symptoms occur even without mood episodes)).A review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 9/23/2025 indicated that the resident completed a Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) with a score of 3 (three) out of 15,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to initiate an individualized care plan (ICP) for residents a.) that was incontinent of bladder and bowel and b.) identified with contractures (a condition of shortening and hardening of muscles, tendons, or other tissue, often leading to deformity or rigidity of joints) and limited range of motion (ROM). This deficient practice was identified for 2 (two) of 30 residents (Resident #14 and #126) reviewed for comprehensive Individual Care Planning (ICP) and implementation and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 12/15/2025 at 09:40 AM during initial tour of the facility the surveyor observed Resident # 95 in bed and they asked if surveyor # 1 could find someone to change his/her brief. A review of Resident # 95's admissions record revealed that, Resident # 14 was admitted with but not limited to fracture of the lower end of right radius, (broken wrist) and rhabdomyolysis (a condition where muscle tissue breaks down rapidly and releases its contents into the bloodstream). A review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 1.) Physician-ordered treatments were administered as scheduled and 2.) proper hand hygiene and infection control practices were maintained during wound care. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 22) reviewed for wound care and skin integrity.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for Resident # 22 revealed a physician's order dated 11/24/2025 for wound care to clean skin tears on bilateral arms with wound cleanser and apply xeroform and an abdominal dressing with Kling wrap daily and PRN (as needed).A review of the admission 5-Day Minimum Data Set (MDS; an assessment tool) dated 12/15/2025 revealed Resident # 22 had a diagnoses including muscle wasting and atrophy, unspecified convulsions, and anxiety disorder.A review of the individualized care plan initiated on 11/24/2025 revealed a focus of I have impaired skin integrity [related to] poor skin integrity with an intervention…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
  Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) obtain physician orders for oxygen (O2) therapy before administering continuous oxygen, b.) monitor and document O2 levels while administering continuous oxygen, and c.) ensure that a resident's Interdisciplinary Care Plan (ICP) accurately reflected and guided the Resident's respiratory care needs in accordance with professional standards of nursing practice.This deficient practice was identified for 1 (one) of 6 residents (Resident #25) reviewed for Oxygen and was evidenced by the following: During the initial tour of the facility on 12/15/2025 at 10:39 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #25 lying in bed in their room. The resident was receiving O2 a rate of two liters per minute (2 LPM) via nasal cannula (NC), [tubing that delivers oxygen through the nostrils] with humidification (a process that adds moisture to the air) in use.A review of the admission Record (admission summary) dated 6/1/25 reflected that Resident #25 was admitted to the facility…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a pain management regimen was followed in accordance with physician orders. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pain (Resident #12).This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 12/15/25 at 11:22 AM, during the initial tour of the facility Resident #12 was observed in the room and said they feel good.On 12/16/2025 at 1:06 PM, Resident #12 was observed in the room and told the surveyor that he/she felt good, that they receive pain medication and said that their pain was controlled.A review of Resident #12's admission Record (an admission summary) reflected that Resident #12 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but were not limited to arthritis and low back pain.A review of the Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), an annual summary, dated 12/02/2025 indicated the resident had a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, which indicated the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered in accordance with prescriber orders by failing to administer an intravenous (IV) antibiotic within the required timeframe. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident # 3) review for medication administration.The deficient practice was evidenced by the following:A review of Resident # 3's diagnoses revealed but were not limited to, acute osteomyelitis (a sudden and painful infection of the bone) of the left ankle and foot, bacteremia (the presence of harmful bacteria in the bloodstream), and a Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection (a type of staph bacteria that is very difficult to treat because it is resistant to many common antibiotics).A review of a physician's orders located in the Electronic Medical Record dated 12/2/2025 revealed an order for Daptomycin (an antibiotic) Intravenous Solution Reconstituted 430 milligram to be administered intravenously one time a day at 18:00 (6:00 PM) for osteomyelitis.A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all medications and medical supplied were stored safely, securely, and in accordance with professional standards. The facility failed to ensure that a resident did not self-administer medications without a physician's order, evaluation, and care plan, and failed to store medications in a locked area. Additionally, the facility failed to ensure medical supplies were maintained for use by having expired supplies in 1 of 2 medication storage rooms inspected under the Medication Storage task. The deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents (Resident # 38) reviewed for medication storage and 1 of 2 medication storage rooms inspected. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of Resident # 38's diagnoses revealed a fracture of unspecified part of neck of left femur (a break in the upper part of the thigh bone), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a group of lung diseases…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0839 — isolated
  Employ staff that are licensed, certified, or registered in accordance with state laws.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview, and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that 1 of 24 Registered Nurses (RN # 1) maintained a valid license or multistate privilege to practice in the State of New Jersey in accordance with the Nurse Licensure Compact (NLC) 60-day residency rule. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the employee file for RN # 1 revealed that she was hired on 8/14/2025.The file included a New Jersey Driver's License issued on 01/17/2025, which listed a primary residential address in New Jersey.A review of RN # 1's employment application, signed on July 21, 2025, also listed a primary residential address in New Jersey.The licensure documentation in the file consisted of a multistate Registered Nurse license from the State of Florida, issued on 4/21/2025, with an expiration date of 4/30/2027. The address listed on the license revealed another New Jersey residential address that was different than the one on her New Jersey Driver's License. A review of Nurse Licensure Compact (NLC) rule…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility staff failed to ensure that respiratory equipment was stored in a manner that prevented contamination, in accordance with infection prevention and control standards for 1 of 6 residents reviewed for oxygen. (Resident # 57). The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 12/16/2025 at 09:32 AM during the initial tour the surveyor observed Resident # 57's continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machine (a machine that gently blows air throw a hose and mask to help a person breath while they sleep) mask laying on the night stand open to air.A review of Resident # 57's admission Record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility with but not limited to Chronic Respiratory Failure with Hypoxia (low levels of oxygen in your body), Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (a group of lung conditions that cause breathing difficulties), and Obstructive Sleep Apnea. (a sleep disorder where a person stops breathing repeatedly during sleep.)A review of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$11,175 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $11,175 — penalty dated 2025-11-25

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 21 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $3.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 17% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ