Coral Harbor Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

53.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 174 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 70.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 70 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.12 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 8% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 110 beds and averages 93.6 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 16 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.51 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.82 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.07 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.75 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.94 to 0.51 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 34% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

18 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 7 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2026-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint #2790808Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) immediately assessed a resident who had fallen and complained of pain. On [DATE], Resident #3 had an unwitnessed fall. The Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN #1) responded to the fall and did not call an RN to assess the resident. The resident complained of pain and was transferred back to bed by two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs). On [DATE], 4 days later, the resident was transferred to the emergency room (ER) for an unrelated medical concern and was diagnosed with a right hip fracture. The facility further failed to b.) ensure that a resident (Resident #10) who experienced an acute change and decline in their medical condition was properly assessed and treated in a timely manner. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 residents (Resident #3 and Resident #10) reviewed for quality of care and was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-10-24 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a safe and sanitary environment. The deficient practice was identified for 2 of 2 units reviewed for environment.This deficient practice was evidenced by the following:On 10/24/25 at 9:25 AM, the two surveyors conducted a unit tour on the first floor and second floor units. The following was observed during the tour:1.At 9:25 AM, the surveyors observed in room [ROOM NUMBER] the floor was soiled with a dried, unknown substance. 2. At 9:40 AM, the surveyors entered room [ROOM NUMBER], and observed an unsampled resident's room, who stated their bathroom shower drain had been clogged and when they took a shower, the water did not drain well. 3. At 9:42 AM, the surveyors entered room [ROOM NUMBER] and observed a resident in their bed. There was a feeding tube machine with tube feeding bottle attached at the bedside. The surveyors observed the side rail padding was soiled with dried up…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — pattern
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NJ Complaint NJ #: 177087 Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to investigate allegations of verbal abuse emailed to the facility on 8/7/24, by both a resident (Resident #145) and their representative, that an unidentified nurse verbally abused the resident and it was not investigated until surveyor inquiry. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #145), and was evidenced by the following: On 1/6/25 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) all reportable events, grievances, accidents, and incident reports for Resident #145. On 1/7/25 at 1:15 PM, the LNHA provided the surveyor with the requested documents for Resident #145. The documentation included the following: An internal compliance hotline call from the resident dated 7/27/24. A fall accident report and investigation dated 9/26/24. A fall accident report and investigation dated 10/14/24. At that time, the surveyor asked the LNHA if those were all the reports for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #: 177087, 178121 Based on observations, interviews, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment by ensuring resident bathroom doors were in good repair. This deficient practice was observed in 1 of 2 nursing units and was evidenced by the following: On 1/6/25 at 12:27 PM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed the bathroom door of Resident room [ROOM NUMBER] to be deformed with a bow causing the top corner and the bottom corner of the handle side to be bowed out from the frame when the door was completely closed. Only the latch was able to fully be seated in the door frame with the top and bottom corners pulled away allowing the surveyor to see into the bathroom with the door closed. The door also had at least eight approximately half inch sized holes drilled into the door on the inside running half the length of the door from the top down. The door handle appeared to be coming off/loose from the door…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Complaint NJ #: 177087 Based on observations, interviews, review of medical records, and other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse within two hours to the New Jersey Department of Health (NJDOH). This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 residents reviewed for abuse (Resident #145), and was evidenced by the following: On 1/6/25 at 1:00 PM, the surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) all reportable events, grievances, accidents, and incident reports for Resident #145. On 1/7/25 at 1:15 PM, the LNHA provided the surveyor with the requested documentation for Resident #145. This documentation included the following: An internal compliance hotline call from the resident dated 7/27/24. A fall accident report and investigation dated 9/26/24. A fall accident report and investigation dated 10/14/24. At that time, the surveyor asked the LNHA if that was all the reports for Resident #145, and the LNHA replied as far as she was aware, it was. On 1/9/25 at 9:04 AM, the LNHA and the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, observation, and review of pertinent facility documents it was determined that the facility failed to complete individual comprehensive care plans for three residents with urinary and bowel incontinence. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 3 resident reviewed for incontinence (Resident #42, #47, and #52), and was evidenced by the following: 1. On 1/9/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor conducted incontinence rounds on the Second-Floor long term care nursing unit with the Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA #1). During the incontinence rounds, CNA #1 removed Resident #47's incontinence brief which was dry and the surveyor observed that the resident had a white towel within the incontinence brief. CNA #1 told the surveyor that the resident requested a towel within the incontinence brief. The surveyor interviewed the resident who confirmed that they wanted a towel in their incontinence brief. On 1/9/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #47. A review of the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #: 173135; 173483 Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, and review of other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to a.) obtain a physician's order for a replacement nutritional supplement after the facility identified that there was a national shortage of the resident's (Resident #146) current nutritional supplement; b.) consistently document the assessment and dressing changes to a resident's (Resident #195) peritoneal dialysis site (kidney treatment that filters waste and excess fluid from the blood using the lining of the abdomen); c.) appropriately administer intravenous (IV) antibiotic medication in accordance to the physician's order; and d.) document communication with the physician in accordance with professional standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified for 3 of 19 residents reviewed for professional standards of practice (Resident #146, #195, and #295). Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Title 45, Chapter 11,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, review of facility medical records and other pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to document the necessary treatment and services consistent with professional standards of practice for a resident with a pressure ulcer. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers (Resident #4), and was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) Resident #4 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses that included but not limited to; dementia, diabetes mellitus and severe protein calorie malnutrition. A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 11/19/24, indicated that Resident #4 had severe cognitive impairment and was dependent on staff for all aspects of activities of daily living (ADLs). A review of Section M reflected that Resident #4 was at risk for developing pressure ulcers and had a full thickness stage 3 pressure area. On 1/6/25 at 12:35 PM, the surveyor observed Resident #4…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure dialysis communication forms between the facility and the contracted dialysis facility were consistently completed. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis (Resident #68), and was evidenced by the following: On 1/6/25 at 12:25 PM, during initial tour of the facility, the surveyor observed Resident #68 in their bedroom sleeping. On 1/7/25 at 9:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the medical record for Resident #68. A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) reflected the resident was admitted to the facility with diagnoses which included but not limited to; end stage renal disease (kidneys have permanently lost their ability to function), chronic kidney disease (slow loss of kidney function over time), and type two diabetes mellitus (body does not use insulin properly). A review of the most recent comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool dated 12/14/24, reflected the resident had a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and review of facility provided documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 observed medication storage room, and was evidenced by the following: On 1/8/25 at 9:49 AM, the surveyor toured the medication room on the Subacute unit in the presence of the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM). The surveyor observed the following: debris on the medication room floor and brown substance build up in the corners; debris (appeared to be a tea bag) in the drain of the sink, brown discoloration in the basin, along the edge of the sink, behind the sink, and around the faucet; in the cabinet housing the sink, the surveyor observed brown, black, and orange substance towards the back of the cabinet under pipes. On 1/9/24 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor reviewed the monthly cleaning schedule which revealed the medication room was to be cleaned on 1/24/25. The medication room had been scheduled for cleaning on 11/22/24 and 12/27/24.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0635 — isolated
  Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Complaint NJ #: 173483 Based on interview, medical record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to obtain admission diet orders for a resident identified as a nutritional risk. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 19 residents reviewed for physician's orders (Resident #146), and was evidenced by the following: A review of the admission Record face sheet (an admission summary) indicated that Resident #146 was admitted to the facility with the diagnoses which included but was not limited to; malignant neoplasm of the urethra (cancer of the tube that carries urine out of the body), absence of the left upper arm limb (left upper arm (LUA) amputation), and right left below the knee amputation (BKA). A review of the admission Screener (AS) dated 4/24/24, reflected that Resident #146 required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs) and was confined to the wheelchair. The AS also reflected that the resident had a pressure ulcer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 20% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ