No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Oakland Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

20 Breakneck Road, Oakland, NJ 07436 · For profit - Individual · 215 certified beds · (201) 337-3300 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (201) 337-3300 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jan 20251 actual-harm citation$28,444 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (32) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $28,444 in federal fines (most recent 2025-05-30)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
340C Ramapo Valley Road · (201) 416-4346 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
350 Ramapo Valley Rd · (201) 337-7300 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
97 Long Hill Rd · (201) 693-2571 · Call to confirm hours
Park
268 Indian Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased7.3%8.7%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.3%4.6%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.5%0.6%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.9%0.8%2.0%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.8%12.1%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.2%2.3%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.3%8.2%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication13.5%18.8%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.6%97.2%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.1%5.4%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.4%15.6%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table19.4%12.7%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.5%1.2%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine42.4%80.1%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission25.0%24.9%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit5.2%8.1%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.262.071.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.961.111.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.4% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 381 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

56.4%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
67.8%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.06U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.02hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.01hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 67.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 115 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.06 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 3% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 36% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF56.4%CMS range 50.3–61.351.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.2%CMS range 9.1–13.610.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge67.8%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge69.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge60.9%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified98.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting93.7%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.4%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.0%CMS range 2.7–8.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.031.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.45
RN hours/ resident / day
0.81
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.27
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.53
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.32
RN hoursweekends
44.1%
Total nursing turnover
52.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 215 beds and averages 201.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.45 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.27 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.63 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.50 to 0.32 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

17
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-05-30)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-03)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

32 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2023-03-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure staff followed care planned interventions to prevent falls for one of two residents (Resident (R) 10) reviewed for falls out of a total sample of 37 residents. This failure resulted in harm to R10 who was admitted to the hospital with a right femur fracture after sustaining a fall from being turned in bed by staff without assistance. Findings include: Review of R10's undated admission Record, under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R10 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses to include chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), history of falling, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, morbid obesity due to excess calories, presence of cardiac pacemaker, and paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Review of R10's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 06/01/22 and located in the EMR under…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-05-30 · tag F0838 — failed to assess facility resources and resident needs — widespread
    Conduct and document a facility-wide assessment to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations (including nights and weekends) and emergencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of pertinent documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the facility-wide assessment included a) an assessment with regard to use of non-certified Nursing Aides (NAs) to address the need of those residents under NAs care and b.) revised the facility assessment to address the contingency plan that included staffing guidelines. This failure had the potential to affect all 199 residents who currently live in the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/22/25 at 9:49 AM, Surveyor#1 (S#1) met with the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) and the Director of Nursing (DON) during an entrance conference, the LNHA informed S#1 that the current census was 199 (total number of residents). The LNHA stated that currently there were three NAs working at the facility. The LNHA further stated that the three NAs were currently in school, working under direction of a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) and nurse, and that they were in the process of taking the examinations. S#1 requested from the LNHA and DON…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike setting. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 4 units (2E Unit) and 1 of 1 dining room, and was evidenced by the following: 1. During an initial tour of the facility on 5/22/25 at 11:10 AM, in 2E Unit, the surveyor observed upon entry to Resident Room#215 (RR#215), the ceiling tile near the window had brownish discoloration. The surveyor observed the 1st bed with broken basin and wedge for positioning under the resident's bed, and the floor was dusty. The 1st bed overhead light with another wedge for positioning. The resident in the 1st bed stated that they were unaware that there was a basin under their bed and probably that was the one they (nursing aides) use for cleaning the resident. At that same time, inside the RR#215's toilet room, the surveyor observed one ceiling tile had dried brownish discoloration and two basins (not stored and not labeled properly) on top of a dusty commode. On 5/22/25…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0728 — failed to protect against nurse-aide misconduct — pattern
    Ensure that nurse aides who have worked more than 4 months, are trained and competent; and nurse aides who have worked less than 4 months are enrolled in appropriate training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Refer F 835Based on interviews and a review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a.) a non-certified Nursing Aide (NA#1) received the required training and competencies needed prior to receiving their own assignment and rendering resident care which included but not limited to; bathing, toileting, transferring, feeding, personal hygiene, and grooming and b.) NAs did not work past 120 days without being certified as a nursing aide. This deficient practice was identified for 2 of 3 NAs reviewed (NA#1 and NA#2) who provided direct care to residents on 4 of 4 nursing units.NA#1 was hired on 9/16/24, to provide care to the residents. NA#1 began independent resident care assignments on 9/27/24, and was not enrolled in a state approved Nurse Aide in Long-Term Care Facilities Training and Competency Evaluation Program (NATCEP) until 1/13/25. NA#1 worked 68 shifts with no evidence of completing the required modules/Skill Competency and NATCEP program prior to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — pattern
    Administer the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Refer to F 728Based on interview and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility's Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA) failed to ensure staff, as well as herself, implemented the facility's policies and procedures including a.) the hiring and utilization of non-certified Nursing Assistants (NAs) to ensure NAs were trained with the appropriate competencies and completed modules prior to receiving their own independent resident care assignment and b.) NAs did not work past 120 days without being certified as a nursing aide. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 3 NAs (NA#1) reviewed, who worked on 4 of 4 nursing units.Interviews on 5/28/25, with staff and the LNHA, revealed that NA#1 was hired on 9/16/24, to provide care to the residents and worked past 120 days (1/13/25) without being certified as a nursing aide. NA#1 began performing independent resident care on 9/27/24, and worked 68 shifts rendering independent resident care with no evidence of being enrolled in a State approved Nurse Aide in Long-Term Care Facilities Training and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-05-30 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — pattern
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and interviews on 5/22/2025 in the presence of the Regional Director of Plant Operations (RDPO) and the Maintenance Director (MD), it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all devices used to initiate call bell notifications were properly functioning. This deficient practice had the potential to affect 60 residents and was evidenced by the following: An observation at 12:45 PM revealed that the shower room near room [ROOM NUMBER] contained 2 shower stalls and a toileting area. Three of 3 resident call bell pull stations did not function when tested by the MD. An observation at 1:31 PM revealed that the shower room near room [ROOM NUMBER] contained 2 shower stalls and a toileting area. One of 3 resident call bell pull stations did not function when tested by the MD. In interview at the time, the MD confirmed the observations. The facility's Administrator and the RDPO were informed of the deficient practice at the Life Safety Code exit conference on 5/23/2025 at 2:30 PM. NJAC…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to treat a resident in a dignified and respectful manner for 2 of 38 residents (Residents #22 and #28) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: 1. On 5/23/25 at 9:21 AM, during a tour on a unit, the surveyor observed the nurse's medication (med) cart in front of the door to Resident #22's room and the door was open. The surveyor observed from the hallway into the room, no privacy curtain drawn. The Registered Nurse (RN) wore a disposable gown and gloves, was seated in a chair at the resident's bedside facing away from the door. A private duty aide was seated across from the resident's bed with their back facing away from the door. The resident was lying in their bed, with the head of bed elevated and dressed in a long-sleeved shirt and long pants. The surveyor observed from the hallway the RN administering the resident's enteral feeding and medications (meds) through their gastrostomy tube (a feeding tube to deliver nutrition directly into the stomach through a hole in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews, review of medical records, and pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Resident's Physician (RP) of a change in condition for 1 of 38 residents (Resident # 85) reviewed. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes, Annotated Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the state of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual or potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and well-being, and executing medical regimes as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to accurately reflect the resident status in the Minimum Data Set (MDS), an assessment tool used to facilitate the management of care in accordance with the federal guidelines for 1 of 38 residents (Resident #135) reviewed for the accuracy of MDS coding. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: A review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS's) Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI; helps facility staff to gather definitive information on a resident's strengths and needs, which must be addressed in an individualized care plan) Version 3.0 Manual, October 2024, reflected, definitions for injury except major, includes skin tears, abrasions, lacerations, superficial bruises, hematomas, and sprains; or any fall-related injury that causes the resident to complain of pain. Major injury includes bone fractures, joint dislocations, closed head injuries with altered consciousness, subdural hematoma. On 5/22/25 at 10:56 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #135 lying on bed. The surveyor…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with bladder patterning was completed and monitored in accordance with resident's comprehensive assessment and facility's policy and procedure. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 1 resident (Resident #111) reviewed for bladder and bowel (B & B) incontinence. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/22/25 at 11:10 AM, the surveyor observed Resident #111 lying on bed, awake, able to respond to surveyor's inquiries appropriately. At that same time, the surveyor observed the toilet room, inside resident's room with a commode. On 5/23/25 at 9:03 AM, the surveyor observed the Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) inside the resident's room while the resident was lying on bed with call bell within reach. Outside the resident's room the surveyor interviewed the CNA, who informed the surveyor that nobody uses the commode in the room because both residents in the room were incontinent, including Resident #111, and the commode should have been…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility provided documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure a.) recommendation to upgrade the resident's diet was followed for resident identified as at risk for nutritional problem and b.) monitored weight according to the physician's order, and care plan interventions, for 1 of 3 residents, Resident#113, reviewed for nutrition. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/22/25 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident#113 inside their room with a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) providing morning care to the resident. The surveyor reviewed the medical records of Resident #113 and revealed: A review of the resident's face sheet or admission Record (an admission summary), reflected that the resident was admitted to the facility with a diagnosis that included but was not limited to; vascular dementia, hemiplegia (condition caused by brain damage or spinal cord injury that leads to paralysis on one side of the body) and hemiparesis (also called unilateral paresis, is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 21 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolated
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to ensure residents received timely and appropriate incontinence care to achieve their highest practical wellbeing. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 2 residents, Resident#113, reviewed, and was evidenced by the following: On 5/22/25 at 11:00 AM, the surveyor observed Resident#113's door was closed with a linen cart outside the door. Inside the resident's room, there was a strong smell of urine. The surveyor observed a Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) providing incontinence care to Resident#113. The CNA showed the resident's soaked incontinence brief. On that same date and time, the CNA informed the surveyor that when she arrived at 7:00 AM, for her 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM (7-3) shift, she did not have a chance to provide incontinence care to the resident until now, at 11:00 AM, because she had a lot of residents on her assignment. The CNA was unable to say how many total residents she had on her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interviews and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services in accordance with professional standards to ensure accurate and appropriate documentation of the receipt of a controlled substance for 13 Schedule II controlled substance medications ordered and received by the facility for use as an emergency backup supply, on 3 Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) 222 Forms (a form used to order controlled substances from a provider) out of 15 reviewed. The deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: 21 CFR 1305.13 Procedure for filling DEA Forms 222. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as case finding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    3. On 5/28/25 at 8:54 AM, Surveyor#2 (S#2) observed Licensed Practical Nurse#2 (LPN#2) assigned to the med cart (med-cart) located on the 2nd Floor, prepare and administer due meds to Resident #162. S#2 observed LPN#2 prepare and administer ferrous sulfate 325 mg (iron, a med that is a mineral used to treat anemia or low iron in the blood) and calcium carbonate 500 mg with vitamin D 200 u (unit) (calcium, a med that is a mineral used to treat low blood calcium and strengthen the bones along with the resident's other meds). Both the iron and calcium were scheduled to be given at 9:00 AM per the PO. S#2 asked LPN#2 if there were any drug interaction warning in the eMAR for the calcium or iron. LPN#2 could not locate any interaction warnings. S#2 asked LPN#2 if there were any drug interaction warnings on the containers for iron or calcium. LPN#2 and S#2 could not locate any warnings about the interaction on the med container labels. S#2 asked LPN#2 if they were aware that iron and calcium can interact if given at the same time. LPN#2 stated they were not aware of the interaction but…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined the facility failed to follow a physician's order for medications with a parameter and acceptable professional standards of practice for 1 of 28 residents, Resident#54, reviewed. The deficient practice is evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45. Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a registered professional nurse is defined as diagnosing and treating human responses to actual and potential physical and emotional health problems, through such services as casefinding, health teaching, health counseling, and provision of care supportive to or restorative of life and wellbeing, and executing medical regimens as prescribed by a licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of pertinent facility documents, it was determined that the facility failed to properly store medication per manufacturer specifications and standards of practice. This deficient practice was identified in 1 of 5 medication carts observed on 1 of 4 nursing units of the facility. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: Reference: New Jersey Statutes Annotated, Title 45, Chapter 11. Nursing Board. The Nurse Practice Act for the State of New Jersey states: The practice of nursing as a licensed practical nurse is defined as performing tasks and responsibilities within the framework of case finding; reinforcing the patient and family teaching program through health teaching, health counseling, and provision of supportive and restorative care, under the direction of a registered nurse or licensed or otherwise legally authorized physician or dentist. On 5/27/25 at 12:34 PM, the surveyor began to inspect selected medication (med) storage areas in the facility. The surveyor observed the following: The surveyor in the presence of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-30 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Complaint # 172385 Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of other pertinent documents, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain medical records that were accurate and easily accessible. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: On 5/22/25 at 1:32 PM, the surveyor requested from the Director of Nursing (DON) the Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) unit assignment sheets for the facility's 4 units for the day shift for 3/19/24, 3/20/24, and 3/21/24. On 5/23/25 at 12:13 PM, the facility provided a computer printout of the staff in the facility for 3/19/25, 3/20/25, and 3/21/25. The surveyor requested from the Licensed Nursing Home Administrator (LNHA), the CNA assignment sheets for the facility's 4 units for the day shift for the three dates. On 5/29/25 at 12:50 PM, the surveyor notified the LNHA that the CNA assignment sheets that were provided to the surveyor were for the year 2025, and not the requested 2024. On 5/30/25 at 10:00 AM, the surveyor requested from the LNHA the CNA assignment sheets. On 5/30/25 at 10:18 AM, the LNHA provided…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-30 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and review of other pertinent facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to follow appropriate use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the physician's order for Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP). This deficient practice was identified on 1 of 1 contracted staff (Hospice Aide), failed to follow appropriate infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection in accordance with the Center for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, standards of clinical practice, and the facility's policy. This deficient practice was evidenced by the following: According to the CDC Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about Enhanced Barrier Precautions in Nursing Homes, dated 6/28/24, revealed, EBP are an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs) in nursing homes. EBP involve gown and glove use during high-contact resident care activities for residents known to be colonized or infected with a MDRO as well as those at increased risk of MDRO acquisition (e.g.,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure five residents reviewed for abuse (Resident (R) 1, R5, R13, R14, and R32) out of 32 sampled were free from physical abuse. This failure increased the risk of other vulnerable residents for further physical abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised 2001, provided by the facility, revealed Residents have the right to be free from abuse . The resident abuse . consists of a facility-wide commitment and resource allocation to support the following objectives: 1. Protect residents from abuse, neglect . by anyone including but not limited to: a. facility staff; . f. family members . 1. Review of R1's undated admission Record, located in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed R1 was admitted on [DATE]. Review of R1's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 07/14/23, located in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a potential allegation of abuse for two of seven residents reviewed for abuse in the sample of 32 was reported timely to the State Survey Agency (SSA). Specifically, the facility failed to report R1's suspicious bruising of the upper arm and an allegation of physical abuse which involved Certified Nurse Aide (CNA)10 and Resident (R) 5 to the SSA timely. This failure increased the risk of other vulnerable residents for further physical abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated 2021 indicated, . All reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin).are reported to local, state, and federal agencies. The administrator or the individual making the allegation immediately reports his or her suspicion to the following persons or agencies. The state Licensing/certification agency responsible for surveying/licensing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a thorough investigation into allegations of abuse for two of seven residents reviewed for abuse (Resident (R) 1 and R5) out of 32 sampled residents. This failure increased the risk of other vulnerable residents for further physical abuse. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating, dated September 2022, provided by the facility, revealed Investigating Allegations 1. All allegations are thoroughly investigated. The administrator initiates investigations. 2. Investigations may be assigned to an individual trained in reviewing, investigating, and reporting such allegations. 3. The administrator provides supporting documents and evidence related to the alleged incident to the individual in charge of the investigation. a. Any evidence that may be needed for a criminal investigation is sealed, labeled, and protected from tampering or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, record review, document review and policy review, the facility failed to have an effective antibiotic stewardship program when the Infection Preventionist (IP) did not complete an infection screening evaluation to determine if the correct antibiotic was ordered for a urinary tract infection (UTI) in order to reduce the development of antibiotic-resistance organisms for one of three residents (Resident (R) 11) reviewed for UTIs out of 32 sampled residents. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Antibiotic Stewardship revised December 2016, provided by the facility, revealed, Policy Statement Antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's antibiotic stewardship program. Policy interpretation and implementation 1. The purpose of our antibiotic stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents . Review of the Infection Preventionist Job Description, provided by the facility, revealed, Job Summary The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-03 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observations, interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to promote a dignified dining experience when staff served meals to residents who were seated at overbed tables in the hallway for 15 of 55 residents who resided on the facility's Unit 2E. Findings Include During an observation on 02/27/23 at 5:36 PM, staff on the facility's Unit 2E, which included resident rooms from 201 to 231, served meals to residents who were seated in the hallway. Eleven residents, with cognitive impairments, were served and ate their evening meal while seated at an overbed table in the hallway. During an observation on 02/27/23 at 5:40 PM, no residents were eating their evening meal in the facility's 200-hall dining room. During an observation on 02/28/23 from 5:21 PM to 5:31 PM, staff on Unit 2E served meals to residents who were seated in the hallway. Fifteen residents, with cognitive impairments, were served and ate their evening meal while seated at an overbed table in the hallway. During an observation on 02/28/23 at 5:33 PM, no residents were eating their evening meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview, record review and policy review the facility failed to ensure that the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner for 185 out of 188 residents (3 residents were receiving tube feedings). Specifically, unit pantry refrigerators were found to contain unlabeled food items brought in by residents' family and were observed to have grime and food residue on the inside. Findings include: A tour of the Unit Pantry refrigerators, which was where the residents could store their food from outside, was conducted on 03/01/23 at 1:14 PM with the Food Service Director (FSD.) In the refrigerator on the 2 North (2N) unit, there is a 16 ounce, opened Greek yogurt noted in the refrigerator. The item has a room [ROOM NUMBER]D on it but was not labeled or dated. The Registered Nurse (RN) 4 on the unit, outside the pantry, was interviewed immediately. She stated food items brought in by family Has to have a name and a date on it and if the item is past three days it has to be thrown out. She was not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-03 · tag F0882 — pattern
    Designate a qualified infection preventionist to be responsible for the infection prevent and control program in the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on staff interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure their designated Infection Preventionist (IP) completed specialized training in infection prevention before assuming the position of infection preventionist. This failure had the potential to affect the residents residing in the facility. Findings include: During the entrance conference at the facility on 02/27/23 at 10:57 AM the Administrator stated the facility's IP February 14, 2023 and had no yet completed specialized infection prevention training. During an interview on 03/02/23 at 2:27 PM the IP stated she had been working on completing the infection control training in the last year and had been the Infection Preventionist in another building during that time. IP was able to complete the training during the survey. During an interview with the Director of Nursing (DON) on 03/02/23 at 2:50 PM she stated it was the terms of her accepting the position (as IP) that she would have to complete it (the training). The DON admitted the training was not completed until after the IP assumed the position.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of 35 residents(Resident (R) 179) had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences. Specifically, R179 was readmitted to the facility to a locked dementia care unit after previously having been admitted to the subacute rehabilitation unit. Findings include: Review of R179's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) under the Profile tab revealed a documented titled, admission Record which indicated R179 was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses including hypertension, lack of coordination, muscle wasting and atrophy and pulmonary embolism. Review of R179's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/18/23, revealed the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact and the MDS indicated the resident showed no behaviors of inattention, disorganized…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interviews, and policy review, the facility failed to complete documentation of residents' wishes for treatment in the Practitioner Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST-used as directions to emergency health personnel in the event of cardiac or respiratory failure)) for three of four residents (Resident (R) 116, R393, and R394) reviewed for advance directives in a total sample of 35 residents. This failure created the potential for residents to not have their wishes known should they suffer a health emergency. Findings include: 1.Review of R116's profile, located on the profile tab of the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R116 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included dementia and generalized muscle weakness. Review of R116's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE] revealed R116 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99, indicating R116 was cognitively impaired and unable to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, record review, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a discharge plan and develop a discharge care plan for one of three residents (Resident (R) 112) reviewed for discharge out of a total sample of 37 residents. This failure increased the risk of incomplete discharge planning for residents wanting to be discharged from the facility. Findings include: Review of R112's undated admission Record, under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R112 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis to include acute kidney failure, encephalopathy, and COVID-19. Review of R112's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/31/23 and located in the EMR under the MDS tab, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating R112 was cognitively intact. Review of R112's Social Services Assessment, under the Assessments tab in the EMR and dated 01/26/23, revealed .Discharge Planning: The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-03 · tag F0661 — isolated
    Ensure necessary information is communicated to the resident, and receiving health care provider at the time of a planned discharge.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview, medical record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure one of three residents (Resident (R) 190) reviewed for closed records had a discharge recapitulation of stay, a medication reconciliation, and a discharge plan of care. This failure has the potential to have any resident that may discharge not have the information required regarding medical appointments, medication regimen, and other information for a successful discharge. Findings include: Review of R190's admission Record from the facility electronic medical record (EMR) Profile tab showed a facility admission date of 01/27/22 with medical diagnoses that included COVID-19, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, and weakness. A review of the Progress Notes from the EMR Prog Notes tab showed, 12/29/22 0:938 Mental Status Questionnaire (MQS) Discharge Summary Social Services. R190 was discharged on 12/13/22 at 4:30PM. The responsible party was the daughter in law and the discharge destination was home. Mode of transportation was private vehicle. Medications were listed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-03 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician acted upon the pharmacist recommendations for one of five residents (Resident (R)161) reviewed for unnecessary medications out of a total sample of 35 residents. This failure increases the risk that residents will continue to receive unnecessary medications that potentially could cause serious adverse effects. Findings include: Review of the R161's Face Sheet, located on the profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR) revealed R161 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included malignant neoplasm of colon, kidney disease, and hypertension. Review of Physician Orders, under the Orders tab, revealed R161's medication regimen included the following medications: Amlodipine Besylate Tablet 5 MG-Give 1 tablet by mouth one time a day related to essential (primary) hypertension (used to treat hypertension). Diltiazem HCl Tablet 30 MG-Give 1 tablet by mouth three times a day related to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-03 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure proper injection technique was used for one of one residents (Resident (R) 138) reviewed for insulin during medication administration. This failure had the potential to result in the wrong dose of insulin administered to the resident. Findings include: Review of R138's undated admission Record, under the Profile tab in the electronic medical record (EMR), revealed R138 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus without complications. Review of R138's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/05/23, found in the electronic medical record (EMR) under the MDS tab, revealed R138 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15, which indicated R138 was cognitively intact. The MDS also indicated R138 had a diagnosis of diabetes mellitus (DM) and received seven insulin injections during the last seven days. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-03-26 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and readily accessible medical records. This deficient practice was identified for 1 of 32 residents reviewed, Resident#116, and was evidenced by the following: On 3/18/21 at 11:09 AM, the Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) informed the surveyor that Resident #116 was cognitively impaired and on hospice care. On 3/18/21 at 11:37 AM, during the tour, the LPN/UM informed the surveyor that the hospice nurse comes to the facility at least 1 to 2 times a week. The resident was seated in a wheelchair in their room. A review of the resident's Face sheet (an admission summary) disclosed that the resident had diagnoses that included Alzheimer's disease, Depression, Hypertension (elevated blood pressure), and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (a most common type of lupus, is an autoimmune disease in which the immune system attacks its tissues, causing widespread inflammation and tissue damage in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$28,444 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $28,444 — penalty dated 2025-05-30

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 53.0≈ chain avg
Health inspection 2 of 52.6-0.6 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.3+0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
1 of 5Avalon Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHamilton, NJ 1 of 5Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare CenterSalisbury, MD 1 of 5Blueberry Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CtrBeverly, MA 1 of 5Canterbury Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 1 of 5Cape Cod Post Acute CareBrewster, MA 1 of 5Crest Pointe Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPt Pleasant, NJ 1 of 5Highland Park Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterChelsea, MA 1 of 5Mount Holly Rehabilitation & Healthcare CenterLumberton, NJ 1 of 5Nashua Post Acute CareNashua, NH 2 of 5Arbor Ridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWayne, NJ 2 of 5Atlantic View Post AcuteNewport News, VA 2 of 5Bayview Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Kingstown, RI 2 of 5Collingswood Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRockville, MD 2 of 5Elmhurst Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterProvidence, RI 2 of 5Graduate Post AcutePhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Heritage Hills Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterSmithfield, RI 2 of 5Laurel Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMount Laurel, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehab & Hcc/The Meadows At LawrenceLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lawrence Rehabilitation HospitalLawrenceville, NJ 2 of 5Lighthouse Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRevere, MA 2 of 5Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare CenterNorth Providence, RI 2 of 5North End Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterBoston, MA 2 of 5Orchard Hill Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterTowson, MD 2 of 5Palm Springs Post AcuteChelmsford, MA 2 of 5Riverview Healthcare CommunityCoventry, RI 2 of 5Roosevelt Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterPhiladelphia, PA 2 of 5Southampton Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterRichmond, VA 2 of 5Springfield Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterSpringfield, PA 2 of 5West Chester Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWest Chester, PA 2 of 5Westgate Hills Rehab & Healthcare CtrBaltimore, MD 2 of 5Willow Brook Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWilmington, MA 2 of 5YORK Post AcuteYorktown, VA 3 of 5Alexandria Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterAlexandria, VA 3 of 5Aspen Hill Rehabiliation & Healthcare CenterHaverhill, MA 3 of 5Belmont Bay Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterWoodbridge, VA 3 of 5Brighton Post Acute CareBrighton, MA 3 of 5Cambridge Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterMoorestown, NJ 3 of 5Capitol Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterHarrisburg, PA 3 of 5Chelsea Rehabilitation And Healthcare CenterGoochland, VA 3 of 5Exton Post AcuteExton, PA

Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
MARQUIS GUARDIAN LIMITED LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST90%since 01/01/2018
UKR LIMITED LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST10%since 01/02/2019
TRYKO GUARDIAN LIMITED LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST68%since 01/01/2018
ROKEACH, NACHUMIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST18%since 01/01/2022
NFR 2020 IRRV TROrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2024
GREYSTONE FUNDING COMPANY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTERESTsince 04/01/2015
MONNECKA, JEANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/24/2023
SCHAFFER, YERACHMIELIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNFsince 11/18/2024
POSEN, MINDEEIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2022
MARQUIS LIMITED LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2021
NUTRACO LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/27/2025
RELIANT PRO REHAB LLCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/09/2025
SEHGAL, ARUNIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 08/09/2023
KERSTEER LIMITED LLCOrganizationLIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTsince 01/01/2018
OAKLAND CARE CENTER REAL ESTATE CO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2015

CMS files one row per role, so the 24 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$26.7M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+8.7%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.6M
Related-party expense7% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 65%Medicare 17%Other / private 18%

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$367per resident / day
operating cost
$11,161per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$402per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in NJ

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the New Jersey Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in New Jersey
$12,775/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$14,448/mo
Nursing home (private)
$8,710/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 315171. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-05-30, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next