Oxford Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 332 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 79.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 95 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.37 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 63% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 19% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 179 beds and averages 169.1 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.50 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.16 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.18 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.59 to 0.26 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are unchanged from the previous inspection. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-11-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for two of 36 sampled residents. (Residents 12 and 26) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Administering Medications, last reviewed April 29, 2025, revealed staff were to obtain vital signs if necessary, and document physician indicated medication administration information. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 12 had diagnoses that included hypertension (high blood pressure) and required renal dialysis. On September 9, 2025, the physician ordered staff to administer a blood pressure medicine, metoprolol tartrate, two times a day. Staff were not to administer the medication if the resident's systolic blood pressure (SBP, the first measurement of blood pressure when the heart beats and the pressure is at its highest) was less than 110 millimeters of mercury (mmHg). Review of Resident 12's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for October 2025 and November 2025 revealed that…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from potential chemical restraints for one of five sampled residents who were ordered psychotropic medications. (Resident 34)Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 34 had a diagnoses that included anxiety. On October 14, 2025, a physician ordered staff to administer an anti-anxiety medication (Ativan) every 24 hours as needed for anxiety. There was no date in the order that indicated when staff were to stop administering the as needed medication. Review of Resident 34's Medication Administration Record for November 2025 revealed that staff had administered the Ativan six times. There was no documented evidence that the physician had re-evaluated continued use beyond 14 days of the as needed anti-anxiety medication. In an interview on November 13, 2025, at 2:30 p.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that the physician's order had not indicated when staff were to stop administering the anti-anxiety medication. 28 Pa. Code…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop and implement an individualized person-centered care plan to render trauma informed care to a resident with a diagnosis of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) for one of 36 sampled residents. (Resident 9) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 9 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included PTSD, bipolar disorder, and depression. The Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], revealed that the resident had a diagnosis of PTSD and displayed symptoms of feeling tired, feeling hopeless, and having trouble falling asleep. There was no documentation to support that symptoms or triggers were assessed related to the diagnosis of PTSD. There were no specific interventions to meet the resident's needs for minimizing triggers and/or re-traumatization. In an interview on November 14, 2025, at 10:10 a.m., the Director of Nursing confirmed that there was no assessment…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-11-14 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than five percent (%) during medication administration on two of three nursing units. (1st and 2nd floor)Findings include: Observations of medication administration on November 13, 2025, from 7:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m., and November 14, 2025, from 9:30 a.m. to 10:00 a.m., revealed 28 medication opportunities with two medication errors that resulted in a medication administration error rate of 7.14%. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 51 had diagnoses that included atrial fibrillation (fast heart rate), hypertension, and heart failure. A physician's order dated November 8, 2025, directed staff to administer Losartan Potassium 25 milligrams (mg) daily. Observation of the medication pass on November 13, 2025, at 11:03 a.m., revealed that Licensed Practical (LPN) 1 administered a half tablet of losartan potassium to the resident, which was only 12.5 mg, half of the dose ordered by the physician. Clinical record review revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-01 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable environment for one of five sampled residents. (Resident 3) Findings include:Observation on August 1, 2025, at 12:30 p.m., revealed the following in room [ROOM NUMBER]:Resident 3 was in bed and had several small black flying insects around her head and face. On top of the mattress, there were four ants.On each side of the window there were large cobwebs, and three ants were observed on the dresser.The floor near the air conditioning unit was observed with a dried yellow substance and the dresser drawer did not close properly.In an interview at that time, a family member stated that small insects were always present, the floor in front of the air conditioning unit had a permanent yellow dried substance, and the dresser drawer did not close properly.28 Pa. Code 201.14(a) Responsibility of licensee.28 Pa. Code 201.18(b)(1)(e)(2.1) Management.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-02-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records that were accurate and complete for two of three sampled residents. (Residents 2 and 3) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 2 had diagnoses that included muscle wasting and anemia. Physician's orders dated January 28, 2025, and February 4, 2025, directed staff to cleanse the resident's sacrum with medihoney and cover with border gauze every day shift and as needed and to apply skin prep (a protective barrier for skin) to both heels every shift. In an interview on February 11, 2025, at 12:52 p.m., the resident stated that staff applied the treatment to the sacrum every day shift as ordered. Review of the treatment administration record (TAR) for February 2025, revealed a lack of evidence that staff documented the administration of the treatment to the sacrum on February 5, 7, 9, and 10, or the administration of the skin prep to both heels on the day shift (7:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m.) on February 8, 9, and 10. Clinical record…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-15 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure physician's orders were implemented for five of 36 sampled residents. (Residents 24, 34, 65, 95, and 145) Findings include: Review of the policy entitled, Administering Medications, last reviewed April 3, 2024, revealed that staff were to obtain vital signs if necessary, and document physician indicated medication administration information. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 24 had diagnoses that included heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On November 8, 2024, the physician ordered for staff to obtain a daily weight for the resident. A review of Resident 24's weights revealed that there was no documented evidence that a weight was obtained on November 8, 9, and 10, 2024. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 34 had diagnoses that included dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. On September 28, 2022, the physician ordered for staff to obtain a weekly weight for the resident. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a comprehensive care plan to meet each resident's needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for two of 36 sampled residents. (Residents 61 and 65) Findings include: Clinical record review revealed that Resident 61 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnoses that included dementia. The Minimum Data Set Care Area Assessment summary dated July 21, 2024, noted that the resident's cognitive decline/dementia was to be addressed in the care plan. There was no evidence that interventions to address Resident 61's cognitive decline/dementia were included in the current care plan. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 65 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], and had a diagnoses that included dementia. The Minimum Data Set Care Area Assessment summary dated October 11, 2024, noted that the resident's cognitive decline/dementia was to be addressed in the care plan. There was no evidence…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on facility policy review, clinical record review, observation, and resident, staff, and family interview, it was determined that the facility failed to provide services to maintain adequate grooming and hygiene for four of five sampled residents who required assistance with activities of daily living (ADLs). (Residents 5, 27, 28, and 81) Findings include: Review of the facility policy entitled, Activities of Daily Living, last reviewed, April 3, 2024, revealed that residents who were unable to carry out ADLs independently would receive the services necessary to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene. Clinical record review revealed that Resident 5 had diagnoses that included depression, osteoarthritis, and muscle wasting. Review of the care plan revealed that the resident required assistance from staff for ADLs. On November 13, 2024, at 12:18 p.m., the resident was observed in bed. Her fingernails were long and dirty with a substance underneath the nails. She stated that she preferred her nails to be kept short, her nails needed to be cut, staff had not offered to cut…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-11-15 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
  Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of the facility meal schedule, observation, and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that meals were served at regularly scheduled times in accordance with resident needs on one of three nursing units. (Third floor) Findings include: Review of the facility's meal schedule revealed that the second and final meal cart delivery for the third-floor nursing unit was for 12:45 p.m. During a group interview on November 13, 2024, at 10:37 a.m., Resident 51 stated that the meals were often served late. Observation on November 13, 2024, revealed the second meal cart arrived to the third-floor nursing unit at 1:10 p.m., and tray pass began at 1:20 p.m., 35 minutes after the scheduled meal time. Observation of the meal cart at 1:28 p.m., revealed that the cart was empty and all trays had been delivered. At that time, Residents 33, 37, 74, 107, 119, and 139, had not received a meal tray. At 1:35 p.m., Resident 119 stated he did not yet receive a meal tray. At 1:37 p.m., Resident 37 stated that his meal tray was frequently missing from the meal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA