Markley Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

44.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 168 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 83.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 106 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.08 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 4% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 121 beds and averages 113.2 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.482 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.70 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.23 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.58 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 41% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-08 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of clinical record, review of facility documentation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1) remained free from neglect, which resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who sustained an acute avulsion fracture of the tibial tuberosity (separation of the kneecap from the shin bone). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program dated October 2022, revealed, Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation. Continued review revealed that the facility will, Identify and investigate all possible incidents of abuse, neglect, mistreatment or misappropriation of resident property. Review of facility policy, Accidents and Incidents - Investigating and Reporting dated revised July 2017, revealed, All accidents or incidents involving residents,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2023-09-08 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policy, review of resident records, review of facility documents, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to make certain that all allegations of abuse and neglect were timely reported to the Administrator of the facility for one of six residents reviewed (Resident R1). This delay in reporting a fall incident sustained by Resident R1, resulted in actual harm to Resident R1 who experienced a delay of treatment and was diagnosed with an acute avulsion fracture of the right tibial tuberosity (separation of the kneecap from the shin bone). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting and Investigating dated revised September 2022, revealed, All reports of resident abuse (including injures of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies and thoroughly investigated by facility management. Findings…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-11-20 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — pattern
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interviews it was determined the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for three of five residents reviewed (Resident R1, R2, and R3).Findings Include:Review of undated facility policy Administering Medications revealed medications should be administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. The individual administering the medication checks the label three times to verify the right resident, right medication, and right dosage before giving the medication. The individual administering medications should verify the resident's identity before giving the resident his/her medication.Review of Resident R1's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated August 31, 2025, revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], assessed as cognitively intact, and had diagnoses of atrial fibrillation…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-09-24 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of resident clinical record, observations and interviews with residents and staff, it determined that the facility did not timely update a resident's care plan to incorporate evolving clinical findings, resident preferences, and refusals of care for one of ten residents reviewed (Resident R1) Findings include: Review of the resident care plan policy titled Care Plans, Comprehensive Person Centered (Revised March 2022) revealed that a comprehensive, person-centered care plan must be developed and implemented for each resident. This care plan is required to include measurable objectives and timetables to address the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs. It must describe the services necessary to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The plan should also account for services that may not be provided due to the resident exercising their rights, including the right to refuse treatment.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with professional standards for two of two medication carts. (carts 3a and 3b+c)Findings include:Review of facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage revised February 2023, revealed that the facility stores all medications in locked compartments, only authorized personnel have access to the keys. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Multi-dose medications that have been opened are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a shorter or longer date for the open vial.Observation of medication pass on August 4, 2025, at 09:48 a.m., on the Third-floor nursing unit revealed Licensed nurse, Employee E8, preparing to administer ordered medication. Observation of the medication cart A at time of the medication administration revealed that all over the counter…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, facility documentation, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to implement appropriate tracking and surveillance of infection for three of three months of infection surveillance data reviewed. ([DATE] through [DATE]) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Surveillance for Infection dated September of 2017 revealed the infection preventionist will conduct ongoing surveillance for healthcare acquired infections and other epidemiologically significant infections that had substantial impact on potential resident outcomes that may require transmission-based precautions and other preventative interventions.For residents with infections that meet the criteria for definition of infection for surveillance, collection of the following data is appropriate:-identifying information (residents name, age, room number, unit, and attending physician)- diagnosis- admission date- date of onset of infection (may list onset of symptoms, or date of positive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — pattern
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective antibiotic stewardship program for three of five of residents reviewed for antibiotics (Residents R53, R63, and R61).Findings include: Review of facility policy, Antibiotic Stewardship revised December 2016, revealed The purpose of our antibiotic stewardship program is to monitor the use of antibiotics in our residents. Review of facility policy, Review of Surveillance of Antibiotic Use and Outcomes revised December 2016, revealed, Antibiotic usage and outcome data will be collected and documented using facility approved antibiotic surveillance tracking form. The data will be used to guide decisions for improvement of individual resident antibiotic prescribing practices and facility wide antibiotic stewardship. As part of the Facility Antibiotic Stewardship program all clinical infections treated with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and interviews with resident and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to accommodate a resident's preference for morning care for one of 24 resident records reviewed (Resident R9).Findings include:Review of Resident R9's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted on [DATE], diagnosed with Multiple Sclerosis (a chronic neurological disorder).Review of Resident R9's, annual MDS (Minimum Data Set an assessment of residents' needs) dated June 4, 2025, revealed the resident was, alert, and oriented and indicated it was very important to the resident the time he got up and ready in the morning, and the time he went to bed. Review of Resident R9's care plan revealed the resident had an ADL (Activities of Daily Living) self- care deficit due to Multiple sclerosis that assessed the resident needing the help of one assist with dressing. On August 4, 2025, at approximately 11:00 a.m. the surveyor heard in the hallway, Resident R9 hollering from the resident's room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan related to antibiotics, within 48 hours of admission that includes the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for a resident, for one of 31 residents reviewed (Resident R53). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Care Plans - Baseline dated March 2022, revealed, A baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs is developed for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission. Review of Resident R53's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a mandatory periodic resident assessment tool), dated July 25, 2025, revealed that the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including multi-drug resistant organism (MDRO), urinary tract infection, wound infection, enterococcus (bacterial) infection and fracture of the left lower leg. Continued review revealed that the resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and review of clinical records and facility policy it was determined that the facility did not ensure a resident's care plan was developed to meet the care and assistants needed for dental services for one of 24 resident records reviewed (Resident R11).Findings include:Review of the facility's policy for Activity of Daily Living (ADL) revised April 2025 states, Residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living independently receive the services necessary to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygieneResident R11 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with anemia, major depression, anxiety, and abnormal gait and mobility.Review of Resident R11'a dental exam dated, December 13, 2024, notes moderate soft plaque buildup and inflamed swollen bleeding gums. Hygiene was noted fair and required staff to perform oral care twice daily for Resident R11 due to the resident needing help.Review of Resident R11's dental exam dated, January 14, 2025, instructed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that that facility failed to provide timely assistance with activity of daily living for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident R9) Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Activity of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting revised April 2025 stated, Appropriate care and services are provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident, and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care) . elimination (toileting).Review of Resident R9's clinical record revealed that the resident was admitted [DATE], with the diagnoses of Multiple Sclerosis (a chronic neurological disorder).Review of Resident R9's care plan dated September 2023, revealed the resident had a ADL self- care deficit due to Multiple sclerosis that assessed the resident needing the help of one assist with…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews and review of clinical records, it was determined the facility did not ensure physicians were notified of a dental recommendation for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R11). Findings include:Review of Resident R11's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE], diagnosed with anemia, major depression, anxiety, and abnormal gait and mobility.Review of Resident R11's dental exam dated June 5, 2025, noted the resident with Extremely inflamed gingivae on margins and papillae. Staff to perform oral hygiene, suggested improved home care and to consult the physician for the resident benefiting in using Peridex (a prescript antiseptic mouth wash that helps with plaque and gingivitis).Further review of Resident R11's clinical records revealed no documented evidence the physician was made aware of the dental recommendation for Peridex. Interview with Unit manager, Employee E11 confirmed there was no evidence the physician was notified of the dental…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 28 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

About 71% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $953K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA