Logan Square Rehabilitation And Healthcare Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

33.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that worse than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 434 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 65.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 206 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 22% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 109 beds and averages 104.6 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.41 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.06 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.54 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.86 to 0.49 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

28 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-01-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of policy and procedures, review of clinical records, review of hospital records, observation and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to a resident with a history of over-the-counter medication usage. The facility failed to conduct a thorough assessment of the resident's environment to ensure that the resident was not in possession of over-the-counter medication for one of seven residents reviewed (Resident R31), which resulted in an Immediate Jeopardy situation. Findings include: Review of facility policy, Visitation, revised September 2022, revealed, Our facility permits residents to receive visitors subject to the resident's wishes and the protection of the rights of others in the facility. 1. Some visitation may be subject to reasonable clinical and safety restrictions that protect the health, safety, security, and or rights of the facility's residents. Restriction of Individual Visitors 6. If it…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure sanitary food handling practices were followed by dietary staff. Findings include:Observations during food preparation and service, conducted on January 11, 2026, at approximately 9:30 a.m. with the Food Service Director (FSD), Employee E13, revealed the following staff were observed not adhering to required personal protective equipment and hygiene practices: Dietary aid, Employee E14, was observed handling ready-to-eat food without wearing gloves.Dietary aid, Employee E15 and Cook, Employee E16 was observed preparing food without a hair net.Dietary aide, Employee E17, was observed wearing a hair net that did not fully cover all hair. Dietary aid, Employee E18, was observed wearing a beard covering that did not fully contain facial hair while engaged in food preparation. Dietary aid, Employee E19 and Employee E20, were observed in the main kitchen area without a hair net. These observations occurred during active food preparation and handling of resident meals. Interview…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Edisputed · IDR2026-01-14 · tag F0574 — pattern
  The resident has the right to receive notices in a format and a language he or she understands.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on review of facility policy, observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility did not ensure posting of required State Survey Agency contact information was readily accessible on two of two nursing floors. (Second-Floor and Third-Floor Nursing Units) Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Resident Rights with a revised date of February 2011 states, Policy Statement- Employees shall treat residents with kindness, respect, and dignity. Further review of the policy states, Policy Interpretation and Implementation- 1. Federal and state laws guarantee basic rights to all residents of this facility. These rights include the resident's right to:.u. voice grievances to the facility, or other agency's that hears grievances, without discrimination or reprisal and without fear of discrimination or reprisal; v. have the facility respond to his or her grievances; w. examine survey results x. communication with outside agencies (e.g., local, state, or federal officials, state and federal surveyors, state long-term care ombudsman, protection or advocacy…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of facility policies, medical records, observations, and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure proper infection prevention and control practices for three of five residents observed (Residents R31, R20, and R95). Specifically, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBPs) during wound care, medication administration via feeding tube, and personal care, placing residents at risk for transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs).Findings include:The facility policy titled Enhanced Barrier Precautions (revised December 2024) states that EBPs are implemented to prevent the transmission of MDROs. EBPs are required for residents who are infected or colonized with CDC-targeted MDROs or who have wounds or indwelling medical devices, including feeding tubes, urinary catheters, central lines, or tracheostomies. The policy requires staff to wear gowns and gloves, in addition to standard precautions, during high-contact…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0628 — isolated
  Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review, and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure the resident and the residents representative received a written transfer notice that included all required details for one of three closed records reviewed (Resident R112). Findings include: Review of Resident R112's medical records revealed that on December 11, 2025, the resident was admitted to the hospital following a fall. Although documentation indicated that a notification was provided, continued review failed to reveal that the written notice specified the required elements, including detailed reason for the transfer and required regulatory information, in a manner and language the resident or representative could understand. Interview with the Assistant Director of Nursing, Employee E4, conducted on January 14, 2025, at 12:50 p.m. confirmed that the written notification provided for the transfer did not include required details as outlined by regulation. Continued interview with Employee E4 further confirmed that it is not facility practice to ensure transfer notices…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews with staff, and review of facility policies it was determined that the facility failed to ensure prevention of accidents and hazards related to medications found at bedside for one of thirty-three residents reviewed. (Resident R62)Findings Include: Review of facility policy titled, Administer Medications with a date of April 2019 states, Policy Statement- Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner, and as prescribed. Further review of the facility policy revealed, 21. For residents not in their rooms or otherwise unavailable to receive medication on the pass, the MAR may be flagged. After completing the medication pass, the nurse will return to the missed resident to administer the medication. Review of Resident R62's record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. The resident had the following medical diagnosis: Parkinsons Disease (Progressive nervous system disorder affecting movement, characterized by tremors, rigidity, bradykinesia…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on a review of facility policy and resident clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure timely and effective follow-up of consultant pharmacist medication regimen review (MRR) recommendations for two of four residents reviewed. (resident R 137, and R7) This failure had the potential to result in inappropriate medication use and medication errors.Findings include:Review of the facility policy titled Medication Regimen Reviews, dated July 2025, revealed that a licensed consultant pharmacist reviews each resident's medication regimen upon admission and at least monthly, or more often if clinically indicated. The policy requires identification and resolution of medication errors, irregularities, adverse effects, interactions, inappropriate dosing, and lack of monitoring. The policy further requires non-life-threatening irregularities to be reported in writing to the physician within three business days, physician responses to be documented in the medical record, and medication-related issues to be monitored through quarterly reports and incorporated into…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

  Based on review on observations, interviews, review of clinical documentation, and review of facility policy it was determined that the failed did not ensure accurate documentation related to pharmacy reviews for one of 22 residents reviewed. (Resident R75)Review of Resident R75 Consultant Pharmacist MMR Recommendation to Prescriber, dated October 15, 2025, indicated Resident has two order(s) for the following: acetaminophen 500mg and Acetaminophen 325mg for mild pain. Please discontinue duplicate order, if appropriate. If both orders are to be given concurrently, please add the total mg dose to each order. Further review revealed a Physician/ Prescriber response to discontinue 325mg and continue with 500mg for scale 1-4 pain. Review of Resident R75 clinical record revealed a physician order for Acetaminophen 500mg discontinued on December 19, 2025. Further review revealed Acetaminophen 325mg order active. Interview with Employee E2, Director of Nursing, on January 14, 2026 at 12:00pm, confirmed incorrect Acetaminophen dose discontinued.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-08-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility grievances, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications in a timely manner for five of five residents reviewed (Residents R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5). Findings include:Review of facility policy, Guideline for Administration of Medications undated, revealed, This guidance is to assist in the timely administration of medications based on time critical and non-time critical scheduled medications. Non-time critical medications will be scheduled for administration in AM, Afternoon, Evening and HS [bedtime] utilizing extended administration times to accommodate the resident's customary routines. Continued review revealed that medications that are prescribed as daily will be defined as In the Morning with medication administration times from 6:30 a.m. through 11:00 a.m.; In the Afternoon medication administration times are 1:00 p.m. through 5:30 p.m.; Evening medication administration times are 6:30 p.m. through 11:00 p.m.; and Bedtime…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-01-15 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on the observation, review of facility policy and procedure, review of manufacturers guidelines, and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to properly label medications upon opening for ophthalmic solutions found on two of three medications carts observed. (third floor carts one and two) Findings: Review of facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage revealed the facility stores all medications and biologicals under proper temperature, humidity, and light controls. Only authorized personnel have access to keys. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medications storage and preparation areas they clean safe and sanitary manner. Multi dose vials that have been opened or at accessed are dated and discarded within 28 days unless the manufacturer specifies a sure they're longer date for the open vial. Observation of medication pass with Employee Licensed nurse, Employee E5 on January 12, 2024, during med pass, inspection of third floor medication cart one revealed seven boxes of multi-use eye drops without any date written on the box…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-01-15 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodation of needs for two of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R215 and R165). Findings Include: Review of Resident R215's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Height and weight measurements dated December 11, 2024, revealed Resident R215 was 6 feet 3 inches tall and weighed 225 pounds. Review of Resident R215's clinical record revealed a nursing note dated December 11, 2024, at 11:49 p.m. that a TELS (an electronic system used to enter, manage, and track maintenance requests) request was placed for a bed extender (increases the length and/or width of existing bed to provide more space and comfort). During an interview on January 12, 2025, at 11:35 a.m. Resident R215 reported that the bed was too small (Resident R215 was too tall for the bed) causing his feet to press against the footboard while lying in bed and subsequently causing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.

Fines & penalties

$43,154 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $43,154 — penalty dated 2024-01-24

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.6M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in PA