University City Rehabilitation And Healthcare Ctr
3609 Chestnut Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (215) 386-2942 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jan 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0568)
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (57%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 8.1% | 16.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.5% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.7% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 28.5% | 10.8% | 6.5% | check this† — see note marked dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.8% | 3.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 1.4% | 17.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 5.1% | 20.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.0% | 93.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.8% | 4.8% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 25.6% | 25.5% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 11.9% | 17.7% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.4% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 21.9% | 68.7% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 18.8% | 22.5% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 3.8% | 9.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.13 | 1.62 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.89 | 1.18 | 1.80 | better |
† This value is several times the typical-state benchmark. It can be real, or it can be a coding artifact in what the facility submitted. Weigh it against the inspection record above.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.3% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 155 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 81.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 92 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.35 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 60% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.3%CMS range 47.6–66.1 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.4%CMS range 6.7–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 81.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 69.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 73.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 95.9% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 97.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 4.7–11.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.13 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 120.3 residents a day — about 97% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.37 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.76 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.88 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.89 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.56 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.88 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 57% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 44 are one tap away and print in full.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-23 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff interview, and physician documentation, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free from significant medication errors for 1 of 2 sampled residents (Resident R2) reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of the facility's policy titled Medication Administration (revised April 2019) indicated that medications are to be administered safely and in accordance with physician orders, including specified time frames. The policy requires that staff verify the correct resident, medication, dose, time, and route prior to administration and perform three label checks. The policy also states that medication errors are to be documented, reported, and reviewed through the QAPI process to identify the need for system improvements or staff re-education. Review of manufacture Sanofi-Aventis U.S. LLC package insert for the drug Lovenox (Enoxaparin sodium) revealed is a low-molecular-weight heparin anticoagulant used to prevent and treat blood clots, such as deep vein…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, review of facility policy, interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that medications were stored and labeled according to professional standards for one of five residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include:Review facility policy for Medication Labeling and Storage revealed that under section Policy Statement: The facility stores all medications and biologicals and locked compartments under proper temperature humidity and light controls only authorized personnel have access to keys. Under section Policy Interpretation and Implementation sub-section Medication Storage #1 Medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received only the issuing pharmacist authorize the transfer medications between containers.#4 Compartments including but not limited to drawers cabinets rooms refrigerators cards and boxes containing medications and biologicals are locked when not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-09 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — patternEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that the medication error rate was less than five percent for two of five residents observed during medication administration (Resident 53 and Resident 110).Findings Include: The facility's medication error rate was 20% based on observation of 25 medication administration opportunities with five errors observed. Review of facility policy, Administering Medications revised April 2019, revealed, Medications are administered in accordance with prescriber orders, including any required time frame. Further review of facility policy indicates Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time, unless otherwise specified (for example, before and after meal orders). Review of Resident R53's clinical records revealed she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and has diagnoses including hypertension (high blood pressure), anemia (lack of healthy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers to the hospital for one of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations (Resident R10). Findings Include: Review of Resident R10's clinical record revealed a nursing note dated November 10, 2025, which indicated that the resident had a change in condition and was ordered by the physician to be transferred to a local hospital for evaluation. Review of Resident R10's clinical record revealed no documented evidence that the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was notified of the facility-initiated emergency transfer. Interview on January 9, 2026, at 11:54 a.m. with Employee E1, Nursing Home Administrator, confirmed that the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman was not notified of facility-initiated emergency transfers for October and November 2025 Further, interview on January 9, 2026, at 12:05 p.m. with the Administrator, confirmed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and staff interviews, it was determined the facility did not provide services in accordance with accepted professional standards of quality related to daily weights for one of 26 clinical records reviewed (R19).Findings Include: Record review of Resident 19's medical record revealed a physician order for daily weights for cardiac monitoring with active dates 12/15/2025 through 1/12/2026. Cardiac documentation stated: [R19] was seen on cardiac rounds today. She was coughing, crackles to lower base with rhonchi. Jugular vein slightly distended. [ R19's] diuretic dose was changed. CXR ordered. BNP ordered. Changes discussed with resident. UM to put resident on report so that staff can monitor patient and maintain her daily weights. On January 8, 2026, at 10:23 AM, an interview with Resident 19 revealed she had not been weighed, despite an active daily weight order. Record review of the MAR and EMR on January 8, 2026, at 10:39 AM showed weight entries that had been documented and initialed, although no weights were taken. Multiple daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interview it was determined that the facility failed to maintain personal care needs for dependent residents for two of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R68 and R10).Findings Include: Findings Include:Review of facility policy Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting revealed appropriate care and services are provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, to include hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care).Review of Resident R68's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated December 10, 2025, revealed the resident had impairment in functional limitation in range of motion in the upper and lower extremity and required set-up assistance with personal hygiene.Further review of Resident R68's MDS revealed the resident was assessed with moderate cognitive impairment and had diagnoses of cerebrovascular accident (CVA - a sudden…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, review of clinical records, observations, and staff interviews it was determined that the facility failed to provide treatment/services for a resident with limited mobility/range of motion to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease for one of 4 residents reviewed (Resident R10). Review of Resident R10's comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS - federally mandated resident assessment and care screening) dated November 17, 2025, revealed the resident was assessed with severe cognitive impairment and had diagnoses of arthritis (joint inflammation), aphasia (communication deficits), and hemiplegia (one sided paralysis) or hemiparesis (one sided muscle weakness).Continued review of Resident R10's comprehensive MDS dated [DATE], revealed the resident had impairment in functional limitation in range of motion in the upper and lower extremity and was dependent on staff with personal hygiene.Review of Resident R10's comprehensive care plan dated May 13, 2024,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate records related to dialysis communication for one of three Dialysis-Residents reviewed (Residents R32).Findings include:Review of Resident 32's clinical records indicated that R32 was admitted in the facility on November 18, 2025, with Diagnoses including End Stage Renal Disease (the final stage of Chronic Kidney Disease -CKD-, where kidneys fail, requiring dialysis or a kidney transplant for survival, as they can no longer filter waste effectively). Review of physician order, dated November 19, 2025, revealed; R32 receives Dialysis Treatment on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays. It also included an order to Check Dialysis Communication form, upon return from Dialysis; Vital Signs upon return; one time a day every Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Fridays.Review of Resident R32 's Hemodialysis Communication Record revealed that it lacked the following information as required per the communication log:On December 30,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for one of three medication carts reviewed (second floor front cart/cart 1).Findings Include:Review of facility policy, Medication Labeling and Storage, revealed that Medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received. Only the issuing pharmacy is authorized to transfer medications between containers. Further review of facility policy indicates that, 2. The nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner. Additionally, policy states, 4. Compartments (including, but not limited to, drawers, cabinets, rooms, refrigerators, carts, and boxes) containing medications and biologicals are locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items are not left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-09 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolatedProvide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, observation, and interview, the facility failed to ensure timely follow-up and provision of recommended dental services for a resident with an identified dental need for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R95).Findings include: Review of Resident R95s clinical records indicated that R95 was admitted in the facility on February 27,2020 with Diagnoses included but not limited to Unspecified Convulsions: (Seizure activity), Essential Hypertension: (High blood pressure) Type 2 Diabetes:(High blood sugar).Interview with the resident on January 6, 2026, at 10:34 am revealed complaints regarding not having dentures and lack of follow-up after the dental appointment. Interview with the resident's representative on January 6, 2026, at 10:36 am confirmed the resident's concerns that dentures had been recommended but not provided and stated she had not been informed of any progress or next steps regarding denture services. Observations during the survey, the resident R95 was observed eating meals without teeth or dentures.Review of the resident R95 dental…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 44 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-09 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, review of facility documentation, clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program related to medication administration (Residents R110, R117, R49 and R53) and Enhanced Barrier Precautions for two of 10 residents reviewed (R32, R49). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Administering Medications, revised April 2019, revealed 25. Staff follows established facility infection control procedures (e.g., handwashing, antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etc.) for the administration of medications, as applicable. An observation of medication pass with Employee E7, Licensed Nurse on 1st Floor Cart 1, on January 7, 2026 at approximately 9:27 AM, on the first floor nursing unit revealed an open employee [NAME] energy drink can, the opening covered by an empty medicine cup, while administering medications to Residents R110 (9:10 AM), R117 (9:36 AM)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — patternKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that two of two passengers elevators were in operating condition. (#1 and #2 elevators) Findings include: Review of information reported to the State Survey Agency on May 23, 2025 included a concern regarding the elevators not working properly in the facility since December 2024. Concerns regarding resident's not going to dialysis treatment on the first floor due to an inoperable elevator on May 3, 2025 was also reported in the to the State Survey Agency on May 23, 2025. Review of facility documentation received on June 9, 2025 from the facility regarding the elevators indicated that on December 11, 2024 at 1:24 p.m. someone from the facility reported #2 passenger elevator as being shut down. Continued review of the documentation indicated that on December 12, 2024 elevator technicians arrived at 11:40 a.m. left the elevator out of services, and indicated in the above referenced documentation additional resources required. Review of facility documentation received on June 9, 2025 from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a 1 out of 3 residents reviewed was assess for self administration of medications. (Resident R3). Finding include: During an observation in Resident R3's room on May 28, 2025 at 2:30 p.m. a bottle of the above referenced medicated lotion was observed a 2nd time sitting on top of the resident's dresser, and not secured. In addition, a medication cup with 3 white pills were observed on the resident's bedside table. When resident asked if they were left there for him to take, Resident R2 reported, yes, the nurses leave them here for me all the time. During an interview with Employee E7 (licensed nurse) on May 28, 2025 at 2:50 p.m. the licensed nurse confirmed that she provided the resident with his medication in his room, and did not observe him take it. She reported that the three pills that were observed in the resident's medication cup were 2-5 milligram tablets of the medication, baclofen, that is prescribed for chronic pain, and 1-5 milligram tablet of oxycodone that is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of clinical records, staff interviews and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that grievences were investigated and prompt efforts were made to resolve grievances for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Grievances Complaints, Filings, with a revision date of April 2017 indicated that all grievances, complaints or recommendations stemming from resident or family groups concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be considered, and that actions on such issues will be responded to in writing, including a rationale for the response. The policy also stated that upon receipt of a grievance and/or complaint, the grievance officer or designee will review and investigate the allegations and submit a written report of such findings within five (5) working days of receiving the grievance and/or complaint. Continued review of the policy indicated that the grievance officer and associated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of clinical records, facility policy and interview with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to conduct a complete and through investigation for an allegation of potential abuse/neglect for 1 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation or Misappropriation - Reporting, with a revision date of September 2022 indicated that reports of resident abuse (including injuries of unknown origin), neglect, exploitation, or theft/misappropriation of resident property are reported to local, state and federal agencies (as required by current regulations), and are thoroughly investigated by facility management. The policy also stated that the administrator provides supporting documents and evidence related to the alleged incident to the individual in charge of the investigation. Review of Resident R1's May 2025 physician orders included the diagnoss of hypertension (high blood pressure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); cognitive communication deficit (difficulty performing activities of daily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, review of facility policy and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the physician when residents did not receive their hemodialysis treatment from the onsite dialysis center for 2 out of 2 residents reviewed (Resident R1 and Resident R2). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, End Stage Renal Disease dated September 2010 indicated that residents with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) will be cared for according to currently recognized standards of care. Review of Resident R1's May 2025 physician orders included the diagnoses of hypertension (high blood pressure); cerebral infarction (a stroke); cognitive communication deficit (difficulty performing activities of daily living safely & efficiently as well as communicating effectively); end stage renal disease (the gradual loss of kidney function reaches an advanced state) and dependance on renal dialysis (the process of filtering the blood of a person whose kidneys are not working normally). Review of Resident R1's May 2025 physician orders included a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interviews, review of facility policy and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were properly labeled and stored according to professional standards for 1 out of 3 residents reviewed (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Medication Labeling and Storage with a revision date of February 2023 indicated that the nursing staff is responsible for maintaining medication storage and preparation areas in a clean, safe, and sanitary manner, and that medications are stored in an orderly manner in cabinets, drawers, carts, or automatic dispensing systems. Continued review of the policy indicated that each resident's medications are assigned to an individual cubicle, drawer, or other holding area to prevent the possibility of mixing medications of several residents. Review of the May 2025 physician orders for Resident R3 included the diagnoses of glaucoma (an eye condition that can lead to vision loss or blindness); chronic obstruction pulmonary disease (COPD-a progressive lung…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on the review of clinical records, interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medication as ordered by the physician for one of 8 residents reviewed. (Resident R1). Findings Include: Interview with Resident R1 conducted on May 8, 2025, at 10:00 a.m. revealed that the nurse does not apply the moisturizer cream, she is supposed to do it all the time. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of physician orders for Resident R1 revealed an order dated February 26, 2025, which indicated Apply moisturize cream within 3 mins of shower to lock in moisture (CervaVe, Eucerin, Cetaphil, Aveeno) Repeat application as needed to establish dry areas. Review of Resident R1's clinical record revealed that the resident receives showers on Tuesdays and Fridays during the week. Review of April 2025's Medication Administration Record for Resident R1 revealed resident was receiving moisturizer as ordered on Fridays, after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-25 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean, comfortable, and homelike condition for four of 15 residents reviewed (R12, R13, R14 and R15). Findings include: Observations during a tour of the facility on March 25, 2025, at 11:15 a.m. revealed the following concerns: Observations on March 25, 2025, at 11:15 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER], revealed that the room had a very strong urine odor. Interview with Resident R12, room [ROOM NUMBER] Bed D revealed that the room always smells of stale urine as Resident R14, who is in Bed A in room [ROOM NUMBER], always urinates on the floor. She said that is goes on every day. She said that the room is also very cold, that when the nurse aides come in the turn down the temperature on the heating unit under the window. She said that she has been complaining about this, but nothing is done. She said that her bed is broken, that the head of the bed does not go up all the way. She also said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents were evaluated for self-administration of medications for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents R114 and R12). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Self-Administration of Medications dated February 2021, revealed, Residents have the right to self-administer medications if the interdisciplinary team has determined that it is clinically appropriate and safe for the resident to do so. Continued review revealed, Residents who are identified as being able to self-administer medications are asked whether they wish to do so. Observation on January 21, 2025, at 11:12 a.m. revealed that Resident R114 had two containers of eye drops at her beside; latanoprost ophthalmic solution 0.005% (treats glaucoma - damage to the optic nerve in the eye) and brimonidine tartrate ophthalmic solution 0.2% (treats glaucoma). Resident R114 stated that she feels the nursing staff do not consistently administer the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolatedHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident's right to request or refuse medical treatments were accurately reflected in the resident's record for one of 30 residents reviewed (Resident R86). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Advance Directives dated September 2022, revealed, The resident has the right to refuse medical or surgical treatment, whether or not he or she has an advance directive. Review of physician's orders for Resident R86 revealed an order, dated June 27, 2024, for Advance Directives: Full Code (allows for all interventions needed to restore breathing or heart functioning, including chest compressions, a defibrillator and insertion of a breathing tube). Review of Resident R86's care plan, dated initiated May 24, 2024, revealed, I do not have an advanced care directive: Full Code. Review of Resident R86's POLST form (Pennsylvania Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment), dated and signed by the resident on March 27, 2023, revealed that the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility policy, review of clinical record, review of facility documentation, and interviews with staff, it was determined the facility failed to to ensure that residents were free from resident to resident abuse for two of 30 residents reviewed. (Resident R77) Findings include: Review of facility's policy titled, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation Prevention Program, revised April 2021, revealed that Residents have the right to be free from abuse, neglect, misappropriation of resident property and exploitation . The program's objective is to maintain care for all residents and particularly those with behavioral, cognitive or emotional problems. Review of information dated August 4, 2024, and submitted to the state Survey Office on August 4, 2024, indicated, Resident R77 (BIMS 9) was in the dining room during dinner and another resident, Resident R37, started to hit Resident R77 in the left arm with her cane because she stated that Resident R77 always tries to eat her food.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that the resident and resident representative receive written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of a facility-initiated transfer to a hospital for one of 3 residents reviewed for hospitalization. (Resident R15) Findings include: Review of nursing note for Resident R15, dated August 6, 2024, revealed that Resident R15 was admitted to the hospital for chest pain. Further review of Resident R15's clinical record revealed that there was no documented evidence that the resident and his representative were provided with a written notice of the facility bed-hold policy at the time of Resident R15's facility-initiated transfer to the hospital. Interview with the Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1, on January 24, 2025 at 9:36 a.m. that Resident R15 and his representative were not provided with the bed hold policy, that included information explaining the duration of the bed-hold, bed hold reserve payment and permitting return to a bed at the facility. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to develop baseline care plans related to bathing and enhanced barrier precautions for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents R114 and R277). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting dated March 2018, revealed, Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care). Interview on January 21, 2025, at 11:13 a.m. Resident R114 stated that she wants to have a real shower, that she only gets provided with a basin of water to wash herself in bed and that she has not had her hair washed since her admission to the facility. Review of Resident R114's admission MDS (Minimum Data Set - a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide assistance with bathing and eating for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents R114 and R78). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), Supporting dated March 2018, revealed, Residents will be provided with care, treatment and services as appropriate to maintain or improve their ability to carry out activities of daily living (ADLs). Continued review revealed, Appropriate care and services will be provided for residents who are unable to carry out ADLs independently, with the consent of the resident and in accordance with the plan of care, including appropriate support and assistance with hygiene (bathing, dressing, grooming, and oral care) [and] dining (meals and snacks). Interview on January 21, 2025, at 11:13 a.m. Resident R114 stated that she wants to have a real shower, that she only gets provided with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to administer medications in a timely manner for three of 30 residents reviewed (Residents R107, R277 and R278). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Administering Medications dated April 2019, revealed, Medications are administered in a safe and timely manner. Continued review revealed, Medications are administered within one (1) hour of their prescribed time. Interview on January 21, 2025, at 1:16 p.m. Resident R107 stated that she did not receive her medications that were scheduled for 9:00 p.m. until after midnight last night. Resident R107 continued that medications are often administered late. Review of Resident R107's Medication Administration Records (MAR) for January 2025 revealed that she was scheduled to receive the following medications at 9:00 p.m.: amitriptyline (treats depression), clobazam (prevents seizures), carbamazepine (prevents seizures), lacosamide (prevents seizures) and levetiracetam (prevents…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-27 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews with resident and staff, review of clinical records and facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain a peripheral inserted central catheter (PICC) consistent with professional standards of practice and in accordance with physician orders and the comprehensive person-centered care plan, for one of 24 residents reviewed (Resident R110). Findings include: Review of the facility policy titled Central Venous Catheter Care and Dressing Changes, revised on March 2022 states, The purpose of this procedure is to prevent complications associated with intravenous therapy, including catheter-related infections that are associated with contaminated, loosened, soiled, or wet dressings. Perform site care immediately if the integrity of the dressing is compromised (e.g., damp, loosened or visibly soiled) and at least every 7 days. Resident R110 clinical records revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] diagnosed with osteomyelitis (bone infection) of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that drug records are in order and that an account of all controlled drugs is maintained and periodically reconciled for three of three medication carts reviewed (first floor front, middle and back medication carts). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Controlled Substances dated November 2022, revealed, Controlled substance inventory is monitored and reconciled to identify loss or potential diversion in a manner that minimizes the time between loss/diversion and detection/follow-up. Continued review revealed, Nursing staff count controlled medication inventory at the end of each shift, using these records to reconcile the inventory count. The nurse coming on duty and the nurse going off duty make the count together and document and report any discrepancies to the director of nursing services. Observation on January 21, 2025, at 10:31 a.m. with Employee E10, licensed nurse, of the first floor front medication cart revealed that there was no…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, review of facility policies and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that insulin pens were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for two of three medication carts reviewed (first floor back and middle medication carts). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Administering Medications dated April 2019, revealed, When opening a multi-dose container, the date opened is recorded on the container. Continued review revealed, Insulin pens are clearly labeled with the resident's name or other identifying information. Observation on January 21, 2025, at 11:32 a.m. of the first floor back medication cart with Employee E11, licensed nurse, revealed the following: An aspart (rapid acting) insulin (medication used to lower blood sugar levels) pen for Resident R122 that was opened and undated; A glargine (long acting) insulin pen for Resident R25 that was opened and undated; A lispro (rapid acting) insulin pen the was opened, undated and was not labeled with a resident's name; A degludec (long…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, clinical record reviews and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to provide foods in accordance with residents' preferences for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents R278 and R40). Findings include: Review of Resident R40's clinical record revealed that the resident was alert and oriented. The resident was provided a regular textured diet with fortified meals three times a day. Interview with Resident R40 on January 21, 2025, at 12:00 p.m. indicated he does not receive the correct food at meal time as follows: Requested for lunch on January 21, 2025, tuna salad received chicken Requested for lunch on January 22, 2025. coffee but received a tea bag, with no hot water nor cream. Request for lunch on January 23, 2025, kielbasa and received chicken. Interview on January 21, 2025, at 1:19 p.m. Resident R278 stated that she eats a vegetarian diet and that she had not been getting vegetarian protein options with her meals. Observation, at the time of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews with staff, review of clinical records and facility policy, it was determined the facility failed to utilize enhanced barrier precautions during medication administration for one of three reviewed residents with feeding tubes (Resident R105). Findings included: Review of the facility policy for Enhanced Barrier Precautions revised March 2024 states, Enhanced barrier precautions (EBP's) are utilized to reduce the transmission of multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs) to residents. Policy Interpretation and Implementation revealed examples of high-contact resident care activities requiring the use of gown and gloves for EBP's include device care or use. Review of Resident R105's clinical record revealed that ther esident was admitted to the facility with Oropharyngeal dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) malnutrition (lack in proper nutrition) and required a gastrostomy tube ( a surgical feeding tube inserted in the stomach through the abdomen. that allows delivery of nutrition, fluids, and medications). Review of Resident R105's care plan for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-27 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations and interviews with residents and staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call devices were functional and accessible to residents for two of 30 residents reviewed (Residents R55 and R78). Findings include: Interview on January 21, 2025, at 1:42 p.m. Resident R55 stated that his callbell did not work. Observation, at the time of the interview, confirmed that the callbell was non-functional. Observation and interview on January 21, 2025, at 2:39 p.m. with the Nursing Home Administrator, confirmed that Resident R55's callbell did not work. Observation on January 22, 2025, at 9:30 a.m. revealed that Resident R78's callbell was on the floor. Resident R78 stated that he was unable to reach the callbell and had no other way to call for assistance. Resident R78 was soft-spoken and unable to yell or call out in a tone loud enough to be heard outside of his room. Observation on January 23, 2025, at 9:17 a.m. revealed that Resident R78's callbell was on the floor and out of the resident's reach. Interview on January 23, 2025, at 12:16 p.m.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility documentation, observations, and resident and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to provide food that was palatable and served at the proper temperature for two of 4 residents reviewed (Resident R1 and R2). Findings include: Review of facility policy, under food preparation, cooking and holding Time/Temperatures, revised November 2022, revealed that the danger zone for food temperatures is above 41 degrees Fahrenheit (F) and below 135 degrees Fahrenheit. This temperature range promotes the rapid growth of pathogenic microorganisms that cause foodborne illness. Foods must be maintained at or below 41 degrees F or at or above 135 degrees F. Interview conducted on December 9, 2024, at 11:00 a.m. with Resident R1 revealed that food is cold. Interview conducted on December 9, 2024, at 9:30 a.m. with Resident R2 revealed that food is cold and burnt. Observations during a test tray conducted with the facility Cook, Employee E5, conducted on December 9, 2024, at 1:15 p.m. revealed that juice registered at 58 degrees F; canned pineapple…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on reviews of resident clinical records, facility policies and procedures, and interviews with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to follow physician orders for one of 4 residents reviewed. (Resident R2) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled, Administering Medications dated 2001 reveled that the individual administering the medication initials the resident's MAR (Medication Administration Record) on the appropriate line after giving each medication and before administering the next ones. The individual administering the medication records in the resident's medical record must indicate the date and tie the medication was administered. Further review revealed that topical medications used in treatments are recorded on the resident's treatment record (TAR). An initial interview conducted on December 9, 2024 with Resident R2 at 9:30 a.m. revealed that the resident did not have a topical ointment applied to the skin as prescribed by her physician for days and today. Follow up interview conducted at 2:30 p.m. revealed that the resident still…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-04-24 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain clinical records on each resident in accordance with accepted professional standards related to documentation of risk and benefits of the influenza vaccine, pneumococcal vaccine and COVID-19 vaccine for seven of eight resident records reviewed. (Residents R342, R347, R341, R81, R346, R103 and R64). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Influenza Vaccine (revised March 2022, Prior to the vaccination , the resident or residents legal representative will be provided information and education regarding the benefits and potential side effects of the influenza vaccine. Provisions of such education shall be documented in the resident's medical record. Review of the facility policy titled pneumococcal Vaccine revised October 2023, revealed residents have the right to refuse vaccination. If refused appropriate information is documented in the resident's medical record. For each resident that receives the vaccine, the date of the vaccination, lot number, expiration date, person…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-04-24 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review facility policy, review of clinical record review, observations and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain an effective infection control program during medication administration for residents (Residents R75, R23 and R15) for 3 out of 3 residents observed during medication administration. Findings include: Review of facility policy on Medication Administration with revision date of April 2019 revealed under section Policy Statement stated that medications are administered in a safe and timely manner and as prescribed. Under section Policy Implementation and Interpretation. #2 The Director of Nursing Services supervises and directs all personnel who administer medications and or have related functions. #25 staff follows established facility infection control procedures. Example and washing antiseptic technique, gloves, isolation precautions, etcetera for the administration of medications as applicable. Review of Resident R75's clinical record revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, clinical record review and staff interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident was evaluated for self administration of medications for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident R9) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Administering Medications revised April 2019, revealed that for residents not in their rooms or otherwise unavailable to receive medication on the pass, the MAR may be flagged. After completing the medication pass, the nurse will return to the missed resident to administer the medication. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of Resident R9's clinical records revealed that resident R9 had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status, an assessment to monitor cognition) score of 12 which indicated that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations and resident interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to maintain the facility in a clean, comfortable, and homelike condition for three of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R11, Resident R2 and Resident R341). Findings include: Observations during the initial tour of the facility on April 21, 2024, revealed the following concerns: Observations on April 21, 2024, at 10:25 a.m., in room [ROOM NUMBER] Bed B, revealed that the room was very dark even though Resident R11 had her overbed light on. Interview with Resident R11 revealed that she was upset that her room was so dark, and that the blind on her window has not worked since she was admitted to the room. Interview with nurse aide, Employee E4, on April 22, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. confirmed that she was aware that Resident R11's window blind was missing the pull chain to raise it up to let the light in. Interview with Maintenance Director on April 23, 2024, at 12:15 p.m. confirmed that the blind in room [ROOM NUMBER]B was broken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0640 — isolatedEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that comprehensive resident assessments were completed in a timely manner for three of six discharged records reviewed (Residents R67, R110 and R111). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident R67 revealed that the resident had a fall and was transported by 911 (Emergency Medical Services) to the hospital on December 5, 2023. Further review revealed that no comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS- assessment of resident's care needs) was completed at discharge. Clinical record review for Resident R110 revealed that the resident was discharged home by the facility contracted transportation service on November 23, 2023. Further review revealed that no comprehensive MDS assessment was completed at discharge. Clinical record review for Resident R111 revealed that the resident was discharged home by the facility contracted transportation service with all his belongings in a wheelchair on November 23, 2023. Further review revealed that no comprehensive MDS assessment was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, staff interview and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a pain medication patch was properly label for one of 24 residents reviewed. (Resident R80) Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Administering Medications revised April 2019, revealed that for residents not in their rooms or otherwise unavailable to receive medication on the pass, the MAR may be flagged. After completing the medication pass, the nurse will return to the missed resident to administer the medication. If a drug is withheld, refused, or given at a time other than the scheduled time, the individual administering. Residents may self-administer their own medications only if the attending physician, in conjunction with the interdisciplinary care planning team, has determined that they have the decision-making capacity to do so safely. Review of Resident R80's clinical records revealed that Resident R80 has a diagnosis of CN'S vasculitis (central nervous system vasculitis a disease that causes inflammation of the small…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, review of clinical record , review facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that a resident with limited range of motion received appropriate treatment and services to increase range of motion and/or to prevent further decrease in range of motion for one of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R24). Findings include: Review on facility policy on Resident Mobility and Range of Motion revealed that under section Policy Statement: #1. Residents will not experience an avoidable reduction in range of motion (ROM). #2. Residents with limited range of motion will receive treatment and services to increase and/or prevent a further decrease in range of motion. Under section. Policy Interpretation and Implementation #6. The interventions may include therapies, the provision of necessary equipment and or exercises, and will be based on professional standards of practice and be consistent with state laws and practice acts. Review of Resident R23's clinical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on facility policy and observation and interviews, it was determined the facility failed to ensure appropriate enteral feeding practices relating to labeling for two of eight residents observed for tube feeding. (Residents R332 and R80). Findings include: Review of facility policy titled Enteral Nutrition revised 2018, revealed the primary function of enteral feeding is to promote adequate nutritional support through enteral nutrition is provided to residents as ordered. The nursing staff and provider monitor the resident for signs and symptoms of inadequate nutrition, altered hydration, hypo- or hyperglycemia, and altered electrolytes. The nursing staff and provider also monitor the resident for worsening of conditions that place the resident at risk for the above. The nurse confirms that orders for enteral nutrition are complete. Review of Resident R332's clinical record revealed that Resident R332 had the diagnoses of absence of larynx (removal of voice box), diabetes type 2 (long term condition in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-24 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on a review of clinical records, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and staff interviews, it was determined the facility failed to implement a complete drug regimen review process for two of 26 residents reviewed (Resident R63 and R101). Findings Include: Review of the undated Medication Regimen Review Policy revealed, the consultant pharmacist performs a medication regimen review (MRR) for every resident in the facility receiving medication. The attending physician documents in the medical record that the irregularity has been reviewed and what (if any) action was taken to address it. The consultant pharmacist provides the director of nursing and medical director with a written, signed and dated copy of all medication regimen reports. Review of Resident R63's medical record revealed that resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD, is a chronic inflammatory lung disease that causes obstructed airflow from the lungs). A review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of personnel records and staff interviews, it was determined that the facility failed to properly document the dates of tuberculin skin test results for newly hired staff members on four of five personnel records reviewed (Employeess E17, E18, E19 and E20). Findings include: The Pennsylvania Code, Title 28, Chapter 201.22. Prevention, control and surveillance of tuberculosis (TB). (b) Recommendations of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), United States Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) shall be followed in screening, testing and surveillance for TB and in treating and managing persons with confirmed or suspected TB. The CDC Fact Sheet, CS 320275-C, Dated September 2020, states, The skin test reaction should be read between 48 and 72 hours after administration by a health care worker trained to read TST results. A patient who does not return within 72 hours will need to be rescheduled for another skin test. Review of employee personnel files for the Employees E17, E18, E19 and E20 revealed a PPD Information Form for each employee that was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-24 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff and resident interview, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that call bells were available and operable for resident use for three of 26 residents interviewed. (Residents R184, R8 and R22) Findings include: Interview with Resident R184 in room [ROOM NUMBER], Bed A, conducted on April 21, 2024, at 11:15 p.m. revealed that she was admitted a couple weeks ago and was having difficulty with her call bell. She stated that the call bell has not worked at all since Friday, April 19, 2024. She said that she told staff and they had the maintenance guy come and look at it, but did not fix it. When asked if she was given an alternate bell she said no, she just call to people in the hall if she needs something. When she pushed the call bell button, it did not light at the wall or in the hallway. Interview with nurse aide, Employee E4, in room [ROOM NUMBER] on April 22, 2024, at 10:00 a.m. confirmed that she was aware that the call bell for Bed A was not working and that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-05 · tag F0710 — isolatedObtain a doctor's order to admit a resident and ensure the resident is under a doctor's care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record review, facility policy and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a physician assessment was completed related to unplanned weight loss for one of 2 residents with weight loss reviewed (Resident R4). Findings include: Facility Policy titled Weight Policy NutraCo reviewed 12/2022 stated any resident displaying a significant change in weight of greater than or equal to 5% gain/loss in one month will be reported to the Registered Dietitian and reweighed under #7. Dietary interventions will be recommended as needed. All significant weight changes will be reported to MD. Review of clinical documentation for Resident R4 revealed that that the resident was admitted to the facility March 8, 2018, with diagnoses of abnormal wight loss, vitamin D deficiency, difficulty in walking, muscle wasting and atrophy, legal blindness, other abnormalities of gait and mobility, peripheral vascular disease, dementia, and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. Review of the resident's weight documentation revealed that on November 1, 2023,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on review of facility policy, pharmacy documentation, review of clinical records, interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered in accordance with professional standards for one of seven residents reviewed. (Resident R7) Findings include: Review of facility policy, titled Administering Medications, revised April 2019, indicated, Medications ordered for a particular resident may not be administered to another resident . Review of physician order for Resident R7 dated June 20, 2023, revealed an order for Diclofenac Sodium 1% Gel to be applied 4 grams to both knees' topically two times a day for knee pain. Further review revealed an updated order, dated January 29, 2024, for Diclofenac Sodium 1% Gel, apply to both knees topically four times a day for knee pain 1 gram per knee 4x daily. Interview with Resident R7 on February 8, 2024, at 10:49 a.m. revealed that staff had been putting someone else's medicine on my legs for a couple of months and that that medicine belonged to another person. Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-09 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that all drugs and biologicals used in the facility were stored in accordance with professional standards for one of two medication carts observed (second floor cart). Findings include: Review of facility policy, Medication Labeling and Storage, revised February 2023, indicated that compartments containing medications and biologicals are locked when not in use, and trays or carts used to transport such items are not left unattended if open or otherwise potentially available to others. Observation of the second-floor cart with Employee E3, Licensed Practical Nurse, on February 8, 2024, at approximately 10:40 a.m. revealed that the medication cart was missing Resident R7's gel medication, Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel 1%. Employee E3 proceeded into Resident R7's room and pulled open the residents unlocked right side drawer. Further observations revealed two tubes of Diclofenac Sodium Topical Gel 1% in Resident R7's drawer, unlocked. Interview with the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interviews, review of facility documentation, review of facility policy and the review of clinical records, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of possible sexual abuse was reported to the Nursing Home Administrator in a timely manner for one out of three residents reviewed (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, with a revised date of September 2022, indicated that if resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident properly or injury or unknown sources is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. Review of the January 2024 physician orders for Resident R3 included the diagnoses of contracted left knee, chronic pain, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing); legal blindness (a term that the government uses for an individual who can still see, but not as clearly as normal vision) and dementia (a term for a group of symptoms affecting memory,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-10 · tag F0836 — isolatedEnsure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interviews, review of the facility policy and review of facility documentation, it was determined that the facility failed to ensure that an allegation of abuse submitted to the State Survey Agency contained complete and accurate information for one out of three residents reviewed (Resident R3). Findings include: Review of the facility policy, Abuse, Neglect, Exploitation and Misappropriation-Reporting and Investigating, with a revised date of September 2022, indicated that if resident abuse, neglect, exploitation, misappropriation of resident properly or injury or unknown sources is suspected, the suspicion must be reported immediately to the administrator and to other officials according to state law. Review of the January 2024 physician orders for Resident R3 included the diagnoses of contracted left knee, chronic pain, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing); legal blindness (a term that the government uses for an individual who can still see, but not as clearly as normal vision) and dementia (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-26 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — isolatedProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview with resident and staff, and review of facility policy, it was determined that the facility did not ensure that a resident was provided with a shower as ordered by the physician and according to the resident's individual needs for one of 57 residents reviewed (Resident R7) Findings include: Review of facility's policy 'Bathing and Showering,' updated June 1, 2023, states the following: residents may be provided with either a shower or a tub bath as per their preference, and provisions and refusals of showers and/or tub baths will be documented in the medical record by the certified nursing assistant and/or licensed nurse. Review of Resident R7's physician orders revealed an order for bath/shower and skin check 7-3 shift twice weekly, Tuesdays and Fridays. Observations on Tuesday, December 26, 2023 at 11:32 a.m., on second floor unit, revealed nurse aide, Employee E3, provide morning bed bath hygiene care to Resident R7. Interview with Resident R7 on December 26, 2023 at 11:40 a.m., revealed that he preferred a shower during morning hygiene care.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-26 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview with staff and resident and review of facility policy, it was determined that facility did not provide food that accommodates resident's preferences for one of one residents reviewed. (Resident R7) Findings include: Review of facility's policy 'Resident Food Preferences,' revised July 2017, states the following: individual food preferences will be assessed upon admission and communicated to the interdisciplinary team, and the food services department will offer a variety of foods at each scheduled meal, as well as access to nourishing snacks throughout the day and night. Review of Resident R7's nutrition progress notes dated December 11, 2023 at 12:28 p.m., revealed resident w (with)/preferences for no pork, received meals w/pork multiple times. During interview with Resident R7 on December 26, 2023 at 12:00 p.m., it was noted that Resident R7's lunch meal tray ticket specified turkey cheese sandwich; meal ticket included Resident R7's dislikes, which included pork and chicken. Resident R7 was presented with lunch meal menu, which included 'chicken…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-09 · tag F0568 — isolatedProperly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of facility documentation, interview with staff and residents, it was determined that the facility failed establish and maintain an individual record transaction of resident's personal funds entrusted to the facility on the resident's behalf and the facility failed to provide resident with receipts for each transaction for one of seven residents reviewed. (Resident R1) Findings include: Interview with Nursing Home Administrator, Employee E1 conducted on August 9, 2023, at 10:17 a.m. revealed that Resident R1 had $3,350.00 which was deposited in the facility bank and was returned to the resident on the day of his discharge. Review of the Inventory of Personal Effects form under section Instructions: revealed that at the time of admission, record the resident's personal belongings by indicating the quantity of those items listed. The original copy shall be kept in the resident's medical record. The copy is given to the resident or resident representative. Update as needed throughout the resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · B2024-09-16 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on clinical record reviews and interviews with staff, it was determined that the facility failed to notify the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman of facility-initiated emergency transfers and discharges for five of nine residents reviewed (Residents R2, R3, R4, R5 and R6). Findings include: Clinical record review for Resident R2 revealed a nurse's note, dated August 19, 2024, at 4:15 p.m. which indicated that the resident was having pain around her gastric tube (a surgical opening and placement of a tube though a person's abdominal wall into their stomach). The physician was notified and ordered for the resident to be transferred to a local hospital for evaluation. Continued review for Resident R2 revealed a nurse's note, dated August 28, 2024, at 8:51 p.m. which indicated that the resident's jejunostomy tube (a surgical opening and placement of a tube though a person's abdominal wall into their small intestine) was unable to be flushed. The physician was notified and ordered for the resident to be transferred to a local hospital for evaluation. Clinical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| TRUIST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | since 03/01/2022 |
| HARMAN, DINA | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| KATZENSTEIN, ALEXANDER | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/17/2023 |
| PAPADA, JONATHAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 11/18/2022 |
| VIROJA, YOGESH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| POSEN, MINDEE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| MARQUIS LIMITED LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| NUTRACO LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/20/2025 |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| KIRCHDOERFFER, SUSAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| NFR 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| QUINTO NEXGEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| SK NEXGEN TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| TRYKO NEXGEN HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| UAK 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| UKR NEXGEN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| UNIVERSITY CITY LEASEHOLD LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| YK NEXGEN TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
| YR NEXGEN TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 03/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 20 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $1.0M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in PA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Pennsylvania Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 395722. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.