Morgan Health Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.1% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 42 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 76.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 65 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 46% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 21% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 120 beds and averages 112.0 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.60 is at or above the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.00 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.33 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

25 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2026-04-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice, resulting in Immediate Jeopardy. Specifically, for 3 of 3 residents reviewed who were prescribed anticoagulant (blood-thinning) medications and experienced falls, the facility failed to implement physician orders for post-fall care. This included failure to conduct timely and frequent neurological monitoring (e.g., every 15 minutes for the first hour) and/or the failure to transfer residents to the hospital as ordered. This deficient practice placed Resident IDs #1, #2, and #3 at risk for serious harm, serious impairment, serious injury or death. Findings are as follows:Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/27/2026 alleged that Resident ID #1 was transferred to the hospital on 4/24/2026 following a fall at the facility on 4/20/2026 with noted head bruising and a last known well date of 4/21/2026. The complaint further alleged that a family member…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident reviewed, who had nausea and vomiting for approximately 21 days and was later transferred and admitted to the hospital with renal failure (a condition in which the kidneys lose their ability to effectively filter waste products, excess fluids, and toxins from the blood. Common signs and symptoms of renal failure may include nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain and weight loss), Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 5/5/2026 alleged that the resident experienced nausea and vomiting for weeks prior to hospitalization. The complaint further, alleged the family requested a hospital transfer, but the facility staff stated the hospital would send [him/her] back without doing anything. The complaint indicated that the resident continued to suffer nausea, vomiting and mouth sores through…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-12-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure that a resident receives care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote wound healing and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with a pressure ulcer (a localized injury to the skin and/or underlying skin usually over a boney prominence), Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows:The Rhode Island Department of Health received a community reported complaint on 12/11/2025 alleging that the facility did not have any hygiene supplies for patients and that Resident ID #1 developed bed sores and s/he was re-admitted to the hospital on [DATE] with a pressure ulcer that was not present when s/he was initially discharged from the hospital 11/25/2025. Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in November of 2025 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, laminectomy (back surgery), diabetes mellitus (a chronic condition where the body is unable to regulate blood sugar)…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
  Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice relative to following physician's orders for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #3. Findings are as follows:Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 7/16/2025, alleged in part that Resident ID #3's medications were not administered according to the physician's orders.According to Mosby's 4th Edition, Fundamentals of Nursing page 314, states in part, The physician is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses are obligated to follow physician's orders unless they believe the orders are in error or would harm the clients.Record review revealed that Resident ID #3 was admitted to the facility in April of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, hypertension. Record review revealed the following physician's orders:-Metoprolol Succinate (a medication prescribed to treat hypertension) ER 50 milligram (mg) one…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the pharmacist failed to report irregularities to the attending physician, the facility's Medical Director, and the Director of Nursing Services (DNS) for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #3. Findings are as follows: Record review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 7/16/2025, alleged in part that Resident ID #3's medications were not administered according to the physician's orders.Record review of a facility policy titled, Medication Regimen Reviews [MRR] states in part, .A licensed pharmacist reviews the medication regimen of each resident at least monthly.The MRR includes a review of the medical record to prevent, identify, report, and resolve medication-related problems, medication errors, or other irregularities, for example, the use of medication.administered without adequate monitoring or in the presence of adverse consequences. 'Irregularities' may also include.other medication errors, including those related to documentation.Record review…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-22 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to store and label drugs and biologicals in accordance with currently accepted professional principles for 2 of 3 units observed and for 1 of 1 resident observed with medications stored in their room, Resident ID #309. Findings are as follows: Review of a facility policy titled Medication Labeling and Storage dated 2021 states in part, .Medications and biologicals are stored in the packaging, containers or other dispensing systems in which they are received .Each resident's medications are assigned to an individual cubicle, drawer, or other holding area to prevent the possibility of mixing medications of several residents . 1a. During the medication storage and labeling task on 5/20/2025 at 5:12 PM, in the presence of Certified Medication Technician (CMT), Staff F, observations of the 3rd Floor CMT medication cart revealed 17 medication cups labeled with residents' last names. Further observation revealed the medication cups containing multiple medications in each, were stacked on top…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
  Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that residents who are prescribed psychotropic medications (medications prescribed to affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) receive gradual dose reductions (GDR), unless clinically contraindicated, in an effort to discontinue these medications, for 1 of 2 residents reviewed with a recommendation for a GDR, Resident ID #84. Findings are as follows: Record review of the policy titled Psychotropic Medication Use dated 2/2025 states in part, Gradual Dose Reduction .Residents on psychotropic medication receive gradual dose reductions (coupled with non-pharmacological interventions), unless clinically contraindicated, to determine whether the continued use of the medication is benefitting the resident, to find an optimal dose, or in an effort to discontinue the medication . Record review revealed the resident has a physician's order for quetiapine (a psychotropic medication) 25 milligrams (mg) two times a day. Record review of the document titled Psychiatric Evaluation &…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
  Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals to meet the needs of each resident related to antibiotic administration for 1 of 2 residents reviewed, Resident ID #49. Findings are as follows: Record review revealed the resident was admitted to the facility in May of 2025 with a diagnosis including, but not limited to, pneumonia. Record review revealed the following physician's orders: -Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate (Augmentin-an antibiotic) 875-125 milligrams (mg) give one tablet every twelve hours for ten days. This order had a start date of 5/1/2025 and it was discontinued on 5/1/2025. -Amoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate (Augmentin) 875-125 mg give one tablet every twelve hours for seven days. This order had a start date of 5/1/2025. Record review of the May 2025 Medication Administration Record revealed the Augmentin was not administered per the order, because it was not available, on the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-22 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on surveyor observation, record review, and staff interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident's medication regimen is free from a medication error rate of 5% or greater. Based on 27 opportunities for errors observed during the medication administration task, there were 2 errors resulting in an error rate of 7.41%, involving Resident ID #359. Findings are as follows: Review of the facility policy titled, Administering Oral Medications last revised October 2010, states in part, .Prepare the correct dose of medication .For liquid medication .Place cup on a level surface and read the poured amount at eye level to check accuracy . Record review revealed the following physician's orders: - Amantadine (a medication prescribed to treat stiffness or tremors) oral solution 50 milligrams (mg) per 5 milliliters (mL), administer 10 mL via G-tube (gastrostomy tube - a medical device inserted through the abdomen into the stomach to provide nutrition, fluids, and nutrients to residents) two times a day. - Cholecalciferol (Vitamin D3) 1000 units,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to ensure that each resident receives the necessary care and services to attain or maintain the highest practicable physical well-being for 2 of 3 residents reviewed relative to follow up appointments, Resident ID #s 1 and 2. Findings are as follows: Review of a community reported complaint submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 4/7/2025 alleges that Resident ID #s 1 and 2 have been trying to get to appointments for his/her hernia (an abnormal exit of tissue or an organ, such as the bowel, through the wall of the cavity in which it normally resides) and a neurologist. Additionally, the report alleges that the facility did not get these appointments and that the residents had to schedule the appointments themselves after waiting almost a year. 1. Record review revealed that Resident ID #1 was admitted to the facility in April of 2023 with diagnoses including, but not limited to, spinal stenosis and diabetes. Review of the progress notes revealed the following: -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, staff and resident interview, it has been determined that the facility failed to protect a resident's right to be free from abuse for 1 of 3 residents reviewed, Resident ID #1. Findings are as follows: Record review of facility reported incident submitted to the Rhode Island Department of Health on 8/28/2024 indicates that Resident ID #2 was witnessed by staff with his/her hand under the blanket of Resident ID #1 rubbing between his/her legs asking him/her do you like that? When staff approached to separate the residents, Resident ID #2 moved his/her hand away quickly. Record review revealed that Resident ID #1, the victim, was admitted to the facility in August of 2024 with diagnoses including but not limited to dementia, difficulty in walking, weakness, and lack of coordination. Further review revealed a Minimum Data Set (MDS) Assessment for Resident ID #1 dated 8/28/2024 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3 out of 15, indicating severely impaired cognition. A…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$61,780 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $17,060 — penalty dated 2026-04-30
• $44,720 — penalty dated 2024-07-10

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

13 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 11% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in RI