Westmoreland Rehabilitation & Healthcare Center
2400 McKinney Boulevard, Colonial Beach, VA 22443 · For profit - Individual · 66 certified beds · (804) 224-2222 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Feb 2019
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $27,885 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-22)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
- its last standard health inspection was over 3 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 10.8% | 14.9% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 3.9% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.8% | 1.6% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 70.2% | 18.7% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.6% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 20.9% | 15.6% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.8% | 20.6% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 93.9% | 94.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 5.6% | 4.7% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.3% | 21.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 5.4% | 14.2% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.6% | 1.3% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 31.6% | 73.6% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.3% | 22.3% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 2.1% | 11.5% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.61 | 1.52 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.52 | 1.48 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
49.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 132 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 84.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 45 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 13% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 49.8%CMS range 39.2–58.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.6%CMS range 7.2–14.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 84.4% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 73.3% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 73.3% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 58.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 97.3% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 85.2% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 3.9–10.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.41 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 66 beds and averages 61.5 residents a day — about 93% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.24 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.86 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.39 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.40 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 43% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 3 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · G2025-04-22 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on clinical record review, staff, and family interviews, the facility failed to provide the necessary foot care and treatment to avoid complications from conditions such as diabetes, including referral and treatment by a qualified professional, for one (1) (Resident #5) of five (5) residents in the survey sample, which resulted in harm. The findings included: Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of diabetes, cerebrovascular accident, dysphagia, aphasia, hypertension, cognitive communication deficiency, chronic ischemic heart disease, adult failure to thrive, malnutrition, hepatitis, and difficulty walking. Resident #5's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], scored the resident on the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) as a 4 out of 15, indicating severe cognitive impairment, but able to complete the BIMS assessment. The resident was not assessed to resist care, including ADL assistance, taking medications, and receiving the care necessary to achieve the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY F600 AFTER F689 Based on clinical record review, staff, and resident interviews, the facility staff failed to ensure adequate assistance was implemented for bed mobility, which the facility had control over to prevent accidents for one (1) of five (5) residents in the survey sample, Resident #1. The findings included: Resident #1 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis, hemiplegia, and hemiparesis following a stroke affecting the right dominant side, muscle wasting and atrophy at multiple sites, lymphedema, spinal stenosis in the lumbar region without neurogenic claudication, and pulmonary embolism. Resident #1's Other Payment Assessment Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 3/25/25 coded for bed mobility (how the resident moves to and from lying position, turns side to side, and positions their body while in bed) as needing extensive assistance and support from 2 or more persons (s), physical assistance. Resident #1 Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection control and prevention program to help prevent the development and transmission of infections, which has the ability to affect all Residents residing at the facility. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to develop and implement a water management plan for Legionella with regards to a risk assessment to identify where Legionella and other waterborne bacteria could grow. On 6/7/23, during review of the facility water management program the facility Maintenance Director of [NAME] President of Plant Operations were present. When asked for their facility risk assessment with regards to water management, which used to identify where Legionella and other waterborne bacteria could grow and spread in the facility water system, the facility had nothing to provide. On the morning of 6/8/23, the Corporate VP of Plant Operations (VPPO) stated they had been unable to locate any type of risk assessment with regards to water management and had nothing to submit. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to 1) mitigate hazards for Residents that use slings, for 1 Resident (#33) in a survey sample of 26 Residents and 2) the facility staff failed to maintain water temperatures in a range to mitigate burns, scalding and other injuries. The findings included: 1) For Resident #33, the facility staff used a mechanical lift without the safety clips being on the hook to prevent the sling from backing out. On 6/7/23 at approximately 11:45 AM CNA's C and D were observed as they prepared to transfer Resident #33 from the bed to the shower stretcher. One CNA was on either side of the bed as they carefully rolled the Resident side to side to get the lift sling positioned under her correctly. The CNAs began explaining everything to the Resident who was responding and following directions. At that time, the Resident requested to be weighed and the CNA's stated that would be no problem as the lift has a weight scale on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — patternHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to maintain Registered Nurse coverage 7 days a week. This has the potential to affect Residents who need the services of a Registered Nurse (RN). The findings included: The facility staff failed to maintain RN coverage for at least 8 consecutive hours a day on 10/15/22. On 6/7/23 during entrance conference, the facility was asked if they had any kind of waivers and they stated that they did not. On 6/7/23, a review of Payroll Based Journal reports revealed that the facility lacked RN coverage on 10/8/22, 10/15/22, 10/22/22 and 10/23/22. On 6/7/23, the Human Resource director ran a report of the nursing staff scheduled for the months of September and October of 2022. A staffing schedule showed that on 10/8/22, 10/22/22, and 10/23/22, there appeared to be a Registered Nurse scheduled. However, on 10/15/22 the schedule appeared to be missing RN coverage. A request was made for timecard punches for 10/8/22, 10/15/22, 10/22/22, and 10/23/22 as credible evidence that the facility was staffed properly for those days.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-08 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation the facility staff failed to 1) ensure controlled substances were disposed of correctly and 2) failed to provide routine medications for 2 Residents (#28 and 16). The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to ensure proper disposal of 24 controlled substances for Residents who no longer reside in the facility or who no longer use the controlled medication. On 6/7/23 at approximately 8 AM, during the medication pass it was discovered that there were 24 controlled substances, in various bottles and cards, to include liquid morphine, liquid Ativan, oxycodone, hydrocodone, gabapentin, Vimpat, morphine ER, and Ambien for Residents who no longer reside in the facility or who no longer use the medication. A review of the facility's Policy entitled Discarding and Destroying Medications, read: Medications will be disposed of in accordance with federal, state and local regulations governing the management of nonhazardous pharmaceuticals, hazardous waste and controlled substances. 1. All unused…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-08 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — patternImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to maintain an ongoing antibiotic stewardship program to monitor the use of antibiotics which had the ability to impact numerous Residents throughout the facility on all nursing units/resident care units. The findings included: On 6/8/23 at 11:42 AM, an interview was conducted with the facility's Infection Preventionist (IP)/Employee J, and the Director of Nursing. Review of the infection surveillance revealed that the facility uses an electronic form to review antibiotic usage to determine if McGreer criteria was met. Several Residents were noted to be prescribed and receiving antibiotics and the assessment indicated antibiotic use was not warranted. The assessment read, Does not meet criteria and Does not meet requirements. The Director of Nursing stated when this happens the facility staff are to talk with the physician and document the conversation about antibiotic use not being warranted and note any new orders received. In each of the instances reviewed where the Resident was noted to not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, resident interview and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure reasonable accommodation of needs for one Resident (Resident #35) in a survey sample of 26 residents. The findings include: For Resident #35, the facility staff failed to ensure the large clock on the bedroom wall was working. Resident #35's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was an Annual Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/19/2023. Resident # 35's BIMS (Brief Interview for Mental Status) Score was a 8 out of 15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. Review of the clinical record was conducted on 6/6/2023-6/7/2023. During the initial tour on 6/6/2023 11:45 a.m., the clock in Resident # 35's room had the time of 3:24. Resident 35 was in the room, sitting in the bed and watching television. On 6/6/2023 at 2:40 p.m., the clock had the time of 3:24. The second hand was not moving. Resident # 26 was observed sitting in his wheelchair and propelling himself in the hallway. He stated he was going back to his room after participating in an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan that included instructions to provide person-centered care for one resident (Resident #255) in a sample of 26 residents. The findings included: For Resident #255, the facility staff failed to develop a baseline care plan to address the care needs of the Resident which would include the use of a 1) CPAP (continuous positive airway pressure) machine when sleeping, 2) wounds on his right foot, and 3) a PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter), that were present on admission and required facility staff management. Resident #255 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Physician orders on admission included order for the treatment of wounds and care of a PICC line. On 6/6/23, Resident #255 was visited in his room. Upon initial interaction it was noted that Resident #255 had a bandage on his right foot/ankle. Resident #255 was unable to give any details as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide care that meets professional standards of care for 1 Residents (#5) in a survey sample of 26 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #5, the facility staff administered 2 doses of Rosuvastatin 80 mg when the order stated Rosuvastatin 40 mg. On 6/7/23 during the medication administration pass for Resident #5, the nurse pulled up the Resident #5's record and began pulling medications. When she came to Resident #5's Rosuvastatin, she read the dosage out loud (Rosuvastatin 40 mg) and then read the card containing 28 pills and it said Rosuvastatin 80 mg. She stopped and said the amounts are not the same. When asked what her next step is, she stated that she would finish pulling the rest of the meds, give them, and notify the Nurse Practitioner (NP) of the pharmacy error. She stated she would also notify her Unit Manager and document the medication that was found and let the NP know that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure 1 resident (Resident # 1) in a survey sample of 26 residents received oxygen care in a manner to prevent the spread of infection. Findings included: 1. For Resident # 1, the facility staff failed to label and date the oxygen tubing. Resident # 1's clinical record was reviewed on 6/6/2023 and 6/7/2023. During the initial tour on 6/6/2023 at 11:40 AM, Surveyor C observed Resident # 1 lying in bed with oxygen, via nasal cannula, delivered by an oxygen concentrator located on the right side of the bed. The oxygen tubing was not labeled and dated. On 6/6/2023 at 12:45 p.m., Resident #3's oxygen tubing was observed again and noted to be without label or date. An interview was conducted with LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) C who stated oxygen tubing should be labeled and dated. LPN C observed the tubing and stated there was no label on the tubing. LPN C stated she knew the tubing had been changed on the night shift on Sunday 6/4/2023 because she was the nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than 5%. There were 3 medication errors in 35 opportunities, resulting in an 8.57% error rate. The findings included: On 6/7/23 at 8:18 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse C (LPN C) and LPN D were observed during the medication administration of Resident #28. LPN C pulled Resident #28's medications which were a total of 10 pills (tablets and capsules). LPN C mentioned that they did not have the MiraLax to administer. LPN C said, it [MiraLax] has been out for several days- we have had hard time getting it from the pharmacy, it is out of stock. Since it is OTC [over the counter], supply has to order it. Following the medication administration, LPN C continued with her medication pass and did not make any attempts to clarify that a supply had/had not come in, notify the physician, or take any other actions. On 06/07/23 at 08:21 AM, LPN C and LPN D were observed during medication administration. LPN C entered the room and administered…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to properly store medications for 1 of 2 medication carts inspected. The findings included: On [DATE] at 8:33 AM, while completing the medication storage tasks Surveyor E made the following observations of the medication cart for the 200 hall in the presence of LPN C and LPN D: 1. Resident #32 had a Lispro insulin pen that had an open date of [DATE], that was on the cart and available for use. Resident #32 also had a multi-use vial of Lantus, which had no date opened. 2. Resident #206, had an aspart insulin pen and a Degludec insulin pen that had no labeling for the date opened. 3. Resident #32 had a Basaglar Kwik pen in the cart, which did not have an open date. A Novolog insulin pen which had an open date of [DATE], remained in the cart and available for use. LPN C confirmed all of the above findings and confirmed the date opened on the ones that had a date and commented, They are only good for 28…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to ensure the medical record was accurate for 1 Resident (#32) in a survey sample of 26 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #32 the facility staff failed to ensure that his clinical record contained only his information. On 6/8/23 when the electronic medical record was accessed for Resident #32 to view the Pre-admission Screening And Resident Review (PASARR) screening, a tab that said PASARR was clicked and what opened up was a document containing 33 PASARR's. Resident #32's PASARR was among the 33 PASARRs. On 6/8/23 at approximately 2PM, an interview was conducted with Employee N who was asked how assessments and records get put in the EHR (electronic health record), she stated that they are scanned and uploaded into the system. When asked if they do one chart at a time, she indicated that they did. When asked if a document is scanned into the wrong person's chart what happens, she stated that when they are aware of it, they immediately correct it. When asked why…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to determine the Resident's immunization status and offer influenza and pneumonia vaccines for 2 Residents (Resident #255 & #48) in a survey sample of 5 residents reviewed for immunizations. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to determine Resident #255's current immunization information and offer any immunizations the Resident was eligible. A clinical record review was performed on 6/7/23. Resident #255's clinical record revealed, under the immunization tab, that the flu vaccine and pneumococcal immunizations were, historical. The record had no information to support where the facility obtained this data. On 6/8/23, an interview was conducted with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) who accessed the clinical record for Resident #255 and verified the findings. The DON further confirmed there was no Virginia Immunization Information System (VIIS) uploaded into the record as evidence that the facility had attempted to obtain the Resident's current…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-08 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to offer COVID-19 immunizations for 2 Residents (Resident #255 and 48) in a survey sample of 5 Residents reviewed for COVID-19 immunizations. The findings include: 1. The facility staff failed to determine Resident #255's current immunization status and offer any COVID-19 immunizations the Resident was eligible for. A clinical record review was performed on 6/7/23. Resident #255's clinical record revealed, under the immunization tab, that the Resident had only received a primary vaccination series for COVID-19 and had not received any booster doses. Therefore, the Resident was eligible to receive the bivalent COVID-19 booster. On 6/8/23, an interview was conducted with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) who accessed the clinical record for Resident #255 and verified the above findings. The DON further confirmed there was no evidence that Resident #255 had received education or been offered the COVID-19 bivalent booster. 2. The facility staff failed to identify/assess…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview, employee record review and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to operationalize policies and procedures on screening for 12 of 25 new employees in the Employee Records Check Sample. The findings include: 1. For Employees # 8, # 11, # 14, # 19 and # 24, the facility staff failed to ensure a criminal background check was obtained within 30 days of hire. On 2/17/2022 at 8:40 a.m., review of the employee files selected for Employee Records Check was conducted with the Human Resources Manager (Employee F) in her office. Review revealed the following: Employee # 8-Registered Nurse, Director of Nursing- hired 1/15/2020- Criminal Background Check on 7/8/2020 Employee # 11-Certified Nursing Assistant-hired 3/18/2020-Criminal Background Check on 7/8/2020 Employee # 14- Licensed Practical Nurse-hired 1/22/2020-Criminal Background Check on 7/8/2020 Employee # 19- Certified Nursing Assistant-hired 7/3/2019- No Criminal Background Check in employee file Employee # 24- Certified Nursing Assistant-hired 2/15/2020-No Criminal Background Check in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2022-02-17 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — patternEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to prepare the meal in accordance with the menu, which affected 52 of the 57 Residents, residing at the facility during survey. The findings included: On 2/15/22 at approximately 10:30 AM, a tour of the kitchen was conducted. This tour included an interview with the cook, Employee F. Employee F confirmed that he was preparing baked ziti as per the menu. On 2/15/22, the menu was reviewed which indicated the following items were to be served: Baked Ziti with meat sauce, broccoli florets, garlic breadstick, and cinnamon brown sugar blondie. The alternate meal was listed as: smothered turkey patty, Caesar salad, and mashed potatoes. On 2/15/22 at approximately 1:00 PM, the lunch meal tray line was observed by Surveyor D. Employee F, the cook, identified the items prepared as: baked ziti, broccoli florets, brownie and the alternate as a chicken patty and mashed potatoes. The preparation of trays was observed and no Residents were served a garlic break stick nor cinnamon…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide Residents with food at an appetizing temperature for 3 Residents (Resident #21, #33, and #41) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included: On 2/15/22, during Resident interviews, Residents #41, #33 and #21 reported their hot foods are served cold frequently. On 2/15/22, Surveyor D requested a test tray be prepared during the lunch meal service. On 2/15/22 at 1:58 PM, the last Resident meal tray was delivered to a Resident. Administrative Employee D, the Registered Dietician, then retrieved the test tray from the meal cart and accompanied Surveyor D to a nutrition room on the unit to review the test tray. Both Administrative Employee D and Surveyor D tasted each food item on the tray and both confirmed that the baked ziti was room temperature and was not at an appetizing temperature. On 2/15/22, following the test tray observation, Administrative Employee D stated that she expect foods to be delivered in a manner so that cold…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to store, prepare and distribute food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in 4 of 4 food storage and food preparation areas. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to store food in a manner consistent with professional standards for food service safety with regard to, labeling and protection from contaminates. On 2/15/22 at 10:30 AM, observations were made in the facility kitchen. The facilities dietary manager was not present during the survey, therefore Surveyor D was accompanied by Administrative Employee D, the registered dietician. In the dry storage room the following items were observed to be opened and not secured in a manner to protect from environmental contaminates: a bag of dry pasta ziti noodles and a bag of elbow macaroni dry pasta. Both bags were open to air, not secured and had no labeling to indicate when they were opened or to be used by. There was also a container of dry cereal that had been transferred out of its original…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain an infection control program in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to prevent the spread of COVID-19 within the facility on 3 of 3 Resident halls within the facility. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to wear appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE) while providing care to a Resident (Resident #21) who was on quarantine for a COVID-19 exposure. On 2/15/22 at approximately 10:05 AM, Surveyor D observed CNA B enter the room of Resident #21. Prior to entering CNA B donned [put on] an isolation gown, face shield and gloves. CNA B was already wearing a procedure mask. There was a sign on the door that read, Special droplet contact precautions and indicated staff were to put on an N-95 mask, eye protection, isolation gown and gloves prior to entering the room. Upon exit, CNA B was interviewed and stated, I apologize, and I didn't put my N-95 on. On 2/15/22 at approximately 5 PM, Resident #21 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure Residents rights to a dignified existence for 1 Resident (#46) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included For Resident #46 the facility staff failed to answer a call bell in timely manner when Resident rang for pain and incontinence care. On 2/16/22 at approximately 1:05 PM Surveyor C entered the room of Resident #46 and found her in bed the sheets pulled away from the corners of the bed, she was dressed in a hospital gown and she stated I'm soaked honey and I'm hurting from my knees to my toes. When asked if she had called the nurse she stated I don't have a call bell. When asked if they had given her anything for pain she said Yes I didn't sleep well and they gave me Tylenol earlier but it doesn't help. The call bell was draped over the headboard out of the Resident's reach. The Resident was handed the call bell and she rang it. Surveyor C stepped into the hall and observed the following: At 1:14 PM - Resident began yelling out Please someone help…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, Resident interview, staff interviews, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to provide reasonable accommodation to Residents who had paralysis for two (2) Residents (Resident #33 and #44) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The facility staff failed to take into consideration the Residents' paralysis and inability to use one side, when placing the call bell so that they could call for assistance if needed. The findings included: 1. On 2/15/22 at 02:56 PM, Resident #33 was visited in his room. Resident #33 was lying in bed, left side paralysis was noted, which Resident #33 confirmed. The call bell was observed wrapped around the arm of a chair located on the left side of the bed past where the head of the bed was elevated and was out of reach. On 2/17/22 at 8:47 AM, Resident #33 was observed sitting in his wheelchair between his bed and the bed of the roommate, in the middle of the room. His hand bell that had been provided to summons staff in the event he needed assistance, was observed on the far side of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility and in the course of a complaint investigation, staff failed to revise a care plan for 2 Residents ( #46 and #208) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident # 46 the facility failed to revise a care plan to include the need for psych services ordered in 11/8/21. Resident # 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per her initial MDS (Minimum Data Set) she had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 9/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Her most recent MDS dated [DATE] recorded the Resident as having a BIMS score of 7/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS dated [DATE] Section E 0100 Psychosis - (Box B was checked) Delusions (misconceptions or beliefs that are firmly held contrary to reality). E 0200 Behavioral Symptoms - (Box B was checked) - Verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g. threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others) - 3…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to provide proper ADL care for dependant Residents, for 2 Residents (#46 and #41) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included: 1. For Resident #46 the facility staff failed to provide timely incontinence care for Resident #46. On 2/16/22 at approximately 1:05 PM Surveyor C entered the room of Resident #46 and found her in bed the sheets pulled away from the corners of the bed, she was dressed in a hospital gown and she stated I'm soaked honey and I'm hurting from my knees to my toes. When asked if she had called the nurse she stated I don't have a call bell. The call bell was draped over the headboard out of the Resident's reach. The Resident was handed the call bell and she rang it. Surveyor C stepped into the hall and observed the following: At 1:14 PM - Resident began yelling out Please someone help me my legs hurt so badly. At !:18 PM - Employee J came in and asked if she needed help she stated that she was in pain and the Employee J stated she would let…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, staff interview, facility documentation, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to apply a hand splint to prevent the progression of contractures for one (1) Resident (Resident #27) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included: On 2/15/22 at 3:29 PM, Resident #27 sitting up in a Geri-chair (type of recliner chair) with a hand splint observed on her over bed table, not in use. Resident #27 was non-interviewable. On 2/16/22 at 8:18 AM, Resident #27 was observed lying in bed. The hand splint was noted to be on the over bed table, not in use. On 2/16/22 at 4:48 PM, Resident #27 was observed in bed, without a splint on. On 2/17/22 at 12:12 PM, Resident #27 was observed in bed, and did not have her splint on. A review of the clinical record for Resident #27 was performed. This review revealed a physician order dated 10/20/20, that read, Pt. [patient] to wear palm guard in left hand as tolerated. Review of the care plan for Resident #27 noted the following: A focus area initiated 8/5/2020, that read, I am at risk for pain due to impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure that competencies were completed for 1 of 5 sampled staff (LPN C). The Findings included: On 2-16-22, a review was conducted of employee records. The facility Director of Human Resources (Employee F) was interviewed. The employee training records were computer-based Relias training, and some paper copies of training which was conducted in the facility. Employee F utilized her computer to facilitate the review, and provided copies to surveyors. According to the Relias Computer System Course Completion History, and all paper copies of training in the facility, the facility failed to implement required training for LPN (C). LPN (C) was hired on 12-27-19. Review of training from 1-1-2021 through 12-31-21 showed no training for Infection Control. On 02/15/2022 LPN (C) was observed passing medications without any eye protection The Director of Human Resources was asked who was responsible for clinical staff training, and she stated that it was the nursing departments' responsibility to ensure…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility staff failed to provide behavioral heath services for 1 Resident (#46) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included: For Resident #46 the facility staff failed to obtain a consult for psych services when ordered on 11/8/21. Resident # 46 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], per her initial MDS (Minimum Data Set) she had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 9/15 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Her most recent MDS dated [DATE] recorded the Resident as having a BIMS score of 7/15 indicating severe cognitive impairment. The MDS dated [DATE] Section E 0100 Psychosis - (Box B was checked) Delusions (misconceptions or beliefs that are firmly held contrary to reality). E0200 Behavioral Symptoms - (Box B was checked) - Verbal behavioral symptoms directed toward others (e.g. threatening others, screaming at others, cursing at others) - 3 -Behavior of this type occurred daily. A review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility staff failed to store drugs appropriately in locked compartments for one of the two med carts at the facility. The findings included: 1. LPN C left several medications on the top of the cart while she went to the Resident's room to administer the medications. On 2/16/22 at approximately 8:30 AM while observing a Med Pass with LPN C, Surveyor C observed LPN C pull medications, place them in a medication cup, leave the medication cards on the top of the cart, and walking off to give the medications to a Resident. LPN D was at the nurses station and she was interviewed at that time and she was asked if it was usual practice to leave the medications on the top of the cart, she stated Oh no those meds should not be left on the cart ever. At approximately 8:35 AM Employee J the corporate RN was asked to look at the cart and she stated No meds should never be left unattended. She might have been nervous about being watched by a surveyor but still she shouldn't leave the meds on the cart. Per the facility Page 2 Medication Administration Policy :…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, Resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to accommodate meal preferences for two Residents (Resident #33 and #10) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included: On 2/15/22 at approximately 10:30 AM, a tour of the kitchen was conducted. This tour included an interview with the cook, Employee F. Employee F confirmed that he was preparing baked ziti as per the menu. On 2/15/22, the menu was reviewed which indicated the following items were to be served: Baked Ziti with meat sauce, broccoli florets, garlic breadstick, and cinnamon brown sugar blondie. The alternate meal was listed as: smothered turkey patty, Caesar salad, and mashed potatoes. On 2/15/22, the distribution of meal trays to Residents was observed. 1. Resident #33's meal ticket was noted to read, Baked Ziti with meat sauce, broccoli florets, garlic breadstick, cinnamon brown sugar blondie square, creamy peanut butter & jelly sandwich and fortified mashed potatoes. Resident #33 was observed to not have the garlic breadstick, a regular…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2022-02-17 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, Resident interview, facility staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to ensure there was a functional system for Residents to call staff for assistance, for one Resident (Resident #33) in a survey sample of 28 Residents. The findings included: On 02/15/22 at 2:56 PM, during an interview with Resident #33, the Resident reported his call bell didn't work and had not for quite some time. Surveyor D engaged the call bell and noted that it did not light the indicator outside of the room. On 2/15/222, during the late afternoon, Surveyor D met with the Maintenance Director and requested a list of all pending maintenance work orders. On 02/16/22 at 8:57 AM, Surveyor D visited Resident #33 in his room. The call bell was pressed/engaged by the surveyor, and was noted to not be working. On 02/16/22 at 8:58 AM, an interview was conducted with RN A. RN A confirmed the call bell is engaged in the room, gives an auditory alarm, lights up out in the hall and has a notification at the desk. RN A further confirmed that call bells are used If…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-07 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — patternKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and facility record review, the facility staff failed to provide personal privacy, and a dignified living experience for 9 of 13 Residents in the Resident council meeting. Residents complained of no privacy due to staff refusal to close personal bedroom doors, no private areas to meet with family and friends, staff refuse residents requests to make their own telephone calls, wandering residents enter rooms freely without supervision, and staff will talk about Residents medical needs out in the open around visitors and other residents. The findings included: On 2-6-19 at 2:00 p.m., A private posted Resident Council meeting was held with surveyors. There were 13 Residents in attendance. 9 of the 13 Residents were found to be alert, and oriented to person, place, time and situation, and were able to give accurate historical information, as supported and expounded upon by their peers. The council expressed the following concerns: 1. The Residents unanimously agreed that they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 4. For Resident #39 the facility failed to develop and implement a person centered care plan to address behaviors related to refusing (Activities of Daily Living) ADL care. Resident #39 an [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Fracture of Femur, Dementia without behavioral disturbance, Arthritis and long term use of anticoagulants. Resident #39's last (Minimum Data Set) MDS coded as having a (Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS score of 99 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 2/5/2019 in the course of a complaint investigation, a clinical record review was conducted and it was found that Resident # 39 had a history of refusing ADL care. Nurse's notes dated 3/26/18 at 2:26 PM stating Bruise found on top of the right hand. Red blue in color. Self-inflicted due to fighting and hitting upon going to the bathroom or changing clothes RP notified and aware of situation MD notified. This note signed by LPN A Another progress note dated 5/17/2018 stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2019-02-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to follow the professional standards for the administration and documentation of medication administration in a timely manner for 3 Residents (Residents # 41, 53, and 27) in a survey sample of 27 residents. 1. For Resident #41, the facility staff failed to administer insulin in a timely manner on many days during the months of December, 2018 and January, 2019. 2. For Resident # 53, the facility staff failed to document the administration of multiple medications as ordered by the physician. 3. For Resident # 27, the facility staff failed to document the administration of multiple medications as ordered by the physician. The Findings included: 1. For Resident #41, the facility staff failed to administer insulin in a timely manner on many days during the months of December 2018 and January 2019. Resident #41 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE].…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2019-02-07 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 3. For Resident #52, the facility staff failed to ensure that a significant medication error did not occur due to unavailable insulin for a period of 14 days. Resident #52 was an [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #52's diagnoses included: Diabetes Mellitus Type Two, Hyperlipidemia, Dementia, Seizure Disorder, Traumatic Brain Injury, Anxiety Disorder, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/15/19, was reviewed. It coded Resident #52 as having a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 2/6/19 a review was conducted of Resident #52's clinical record, revealing the following signed physician order, Bydureon Injection 2 MG subcutaneously one time a day every week on Monday. The Medication Administration Record for January, 2019 was reviewed. On Monday, 1/28/19 11:53 A.M. it read, Not Administered Drug item unavailable In addition, Resident #52's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of an unavailable diabetic management medication. For Resident #52, the facility staff failed to notify the physician of an unavailable diabetic management medication (Bydureon BCise auto-injector/insulin), resulting in the resident receiving the medication in 14 days, instead of 7 days, as per the signed physician order. The Findings included: Resident #52 was an [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #52's diagnoses included: Diabetes Mellitus Type Two, Hyperlipidemia, Dementia, Seizure Disorder, Traumatic Brain Injury, Anxiety Disorder, and Post Traumatic Stress Disorder. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 1/15/19, was reviewed. It coded Resident #52 as having a Brief Interview of Mental Status Score of 2, indicating severe cognitive impairment. On 2/6/19 at 9:00 A.M., an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation and clinical record review the facility failed to provide a Medicaid/ Medicare Coverage Liability Notice for 1 Resident (Resident # 40) in a survey sample of 27 Residents. For Resident #4 the facility failed to provide Resident with a Medicaid/ Medicare Coverage Liability Notice prior to discharge. The findings include: Resident #40 a [AGE] year old woman was admitted to the facility with diagnoses of but not limited to Diabetes, Dementia, Atrial Fibrillation, Fracture of Femur, and (Urinary Tract Infection) UTI. Resident #40 had a (Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS score of 2 indicating severe cognitive impairment. She required physical assistance of 1 person with all aspects of (Activities of Daily Living) ADL care. On 02/07/2019 during the completion of facility tasks, the Administrator submitted the Medicaid/ Medicare Coverage Liability Notices and it was noted that one of the documents was not completed. On 02/07/2019, an interview was conducted with the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. For Resident #39 the facility failed to ensure freedom from verbal abuse by a staff member and being undressed and held down and made to shower after having refused on several occasions. Resident #39 an [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Fracture of Femur, Dementia without behavioral disturbance, Arthritis and long term use of anticoagulants. Resident #39's last (Minimum Data Set) MDS coded as having a (Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS score of 99 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On [DATE] the facility provided their investigation of a complaint involving Resident #39. The complaint alleged the resident was physically abused by staff, forced to undress against her will and forced to shower against her will. The documents included witness statements made at the time of the incident. The facility submitted a file of documents from their investigation into the incident on [DATE]; included was a statement from CNA A stating [Resident #39 name]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review, and clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to operationalize the abuse policy to include documentation of training after investigation of injuries of unknown origin for 1 residents (Resident # 55) in a survey sample of 27 residents. 1. For Resident # 55, the facility staff failed to report train the staff regarding proper transfers after investigation of an injury of unknown origin revealed a staff member used improper transfer resulting in fracture of her right ankle. The findings included: Resident # 55 was a [AGE] year old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to: Dementia, Hypertension, Deep Vein Thrombosis, and age-related Osteoporosis. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of [DATE]. The MDS coded Resident # 55 with severe cognitive impairment; Resident # 55 was coded as requiring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility documentation review, clinical record review, and in the course of a complaint investigation the facility staff failed to report an allegation of abuse timely for Resident #13 in a survey sample of 27 residents. Resident #3 (male) willfully assaulted Resident #13 (female) on 9-4-18 and no report was sent to the state agency until 6 days later. All abuse reporting must be completed within 24 hours of the incident, or sooner. The findings included: Resident #13 was a female initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including but not limited to; Dementia, cognitive communication deficit, hip pain, edema, dysphagia, folate deficiency anemia. The Resident was a Full Code status, meaning that CPR was requested to be performed as needed. The Resident was ambulatory and a known wanderer, with orders for a wanderguard bracelet to monitor the potential for elopement. The most recent Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) with an ARD (assessment reference date)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. For Resident #39 the facility failed to submit an accurate complete investigation to the OLC and failed to provide additional training to all involved staff. Resident #39 an [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Fracture of Femur, Dementia without behavioral disturbance, Arthritis and long term use of anticoagulants. Resident #39's last (Minimum Data Set) MDS coded as having a (Brief Interview of Mental Status) BIMS score of 99 indicating severe cognitive impairment. On [DATE] the facility provided their investigation of the complaint involving Resident #39. The complaint alleged the resident was physically abused by staff, forced to undress against her will and forced to shower against her will. Their documents included witness statements written at the time of the incident. The facility submitted a file of documents from their investigation into the incident on [DATE] included was a statement from CNA A stating [Resident #39 name] Shower day she didn't…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, closed record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to notify the ombudsman of transfer to hospital for one Resident (Resident #56) in a sample size of 27 residents. Because the resident was no longer at the facility, a closed record review was conducted. The findings included: Resident #56, a [AGE] year old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to dementia, depression, anxiety, dysphagia, muscle weakness, and history of femur fracture. Resident # 56's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/16/2018 was coded as a significant change in status assessment. The Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #56 was not coded but cognitive ability for daily decision-making was coded as severely impaired. Functional status for eating, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene was coded as requiring extensive assistance from staff. Transfers between surfaces were coded as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, closed record review, and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to give notice of a bed hold when transferred to hospital for one Resident (Resident #56) in a sample size of 27 residents. Because the resident was no longer at the facility, a closed record review was conducted. The findings included: Resident #56, a [AGE] year old female, was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included but not limited to dementia, depression, anxiety, dysphagia, muscle weakness, and history of femur fracture. Resident # 56's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 01/16/2018 was coded as a significant change in status assessment. The Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) for Resident #56 was not coded but cognitive ability for daily decision-making was coded as severely impaired. Functional status for eating, dressing, toileting, and personal hygiene was coded as requiring extensive assistance from staff. Transfers between surfaces were coded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and in the course of a complaint investigation, the facility staff failed to provide supervision to mitigate accident hazards for two resident in a survey sample of 27 residents. 1. For Resident # 55, the facility staff failed to transfer properly using two person assistance and gait belt as written in the care plan. 2. The facility staff failed to provide supervision, to include cueing and oversight for Resident #10 while she drank scalding hot chocolate. The findings included: 1. For Resident # 55, the facility staff failed to transfer properly using two person assistance and gait belt as written in the care plan. Resident # 55 was a [AGE] year old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to: Dementia, Hypertension, Deep Vein Thrombosis, and age-related Osteoporosis. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a quarterly assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/21/18. The MDS coded Resident # 55 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and clinical record review the facility staff failed to ensure medication was available for use for 2 of 27 residents. 1. For Resident # 53, the facility staff failed to ensure medication was available for use. 2. For Resident #52, the facility staff failed to ensure that diabetic management medication was available for administration. The Findings Include: 1. For Resident # 53, the facility staff failed to ensure medication was available for use. Resident # 53 was an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to Gastrointestinal hemorrhage, Muscle Weakness, Multiple fractures of ribs, left side, Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, Malignant neoplasm of Kidney, long term use of anticoagulants, chest pain, fracture of sternum and Dementia without behavioral disturbance. Resident # 53's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) was a 30 day assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 1/15/2019. The MDS coded…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, facility documentation review and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to perform Medication Regimen Reviews for two Residents (# 53 and # 27) in a survey sample of 27 residents. 1. For Resident # 53, the facility staff failed to conduct a Monthly Medication Regimen Review in December 2018. 2. For Resident # 27, the facility staff failed to conduct a Monthly Medication Regimen Review in December 2018. Findings included: 1. For Resident # 53, the facility staff failed to conduct a Monthly Medication Regimen Review in December 2018. Resident # 53 was an [AGE] year old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of, but not limited to Gastrointestinal hemorrhage, Muscle Weakness, Multiple fractures of ribs, left side, Malignant neoplasm of bronchus or lung, Malignant neoplasm of Kidney, long term use of anticoagulants, chest pain, fracture of sternum and Dementia without behavioral disturbance. Resident # 53's most recent Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2019-02-07 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility documentation the facility failed to ensure that Residents were free from unnecessary psychotropic medication for 1 Residents (Resident #6) in a survey sample of 27 Residents. 1. For Resident #6 the facility failed to ensure the Resident had the appropriate diagnosis for receiving Anti-psychotic medications. The findings include: Resident # 6 is a [AGE] year old woman admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of but not limited to Dementia with behavioral disturbance, fracture of femur, Contracture of left hand, major depressive disorder single episode unspecified, Unspecified mood disorder. Resident #6's last two (minimum Data Set) MDS (screening tool) coded as Quarterly on 8/8/18 and Annual on 11/8/18, both coded the resident in section E-0100- Psychosis as Z. None of the above indicating that the Resident has had no Hallucinations or Delusions. Under section I Active Diagnosis - Psychiatric/Mood Disorders both MDS' coded her as NOT having…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on staff interview and facility documentation, the facility staff failed to date a multi-dose vial that had been accessed. The findings included: On 02/07/2019 at 11:45 AM, LPN A, the Corporate DON, and this surveyor entered the medication room by the central nurse's station. The medication refrigerator was unlocked by LPN A and the contents were inspected. A multi-dose vial of Influenza Vaccine was in an open box. The vial was removed from the box to note the vial's plastic top was removed, the rubber stopper appeared to be needle-punctured, and there was approximately 2 ml of clear medication in the vial. There was no writing on the vial to indicate when it was first opened. When asked about the policy for dating multi-dose vials, the corporate DON stated, It should be dated when opened. When asked how long a multi-dose vial is good for before it is discarded, the corporate DON stated, 30 days. When asked what will be done with this undated vial, the corporate DON stated, I will pull it and discard it. The facility policy General Guidelines for Medication Storage was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to serve hot chocolate at a safe temperature. The facility staff failed to ensure that Resident #10 was not served scalding hot chocolate. The Findings included: Resident #10 was a [AGE] year old who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #10's diagnoses included Gastro-esophageal Reflux Disease, Generalized Muscle Weakness, Other Chronic Pain, Inflammatory polyneuropathy, Functional dyspepsia, Sarcoidosis, Hypertension, Major Depressive Disorder, Hypokalemia, Heart Disease, and Diabetes Mellitus Type Two. The Minimum Data Set, which was a Quarterly Assessment with an Assessment Reference Date of 8/11/18, coded Resident #10 as requiring the extensive assistance of two persons for bed mobility, transfers, and dressing. For eating, Resident #10 was coded as requiring supervision to include cueing and oversight. In addition, she was also coded as being on 2 opioid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2019-02-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to obtain holding temperatures of breakfast and lunch food items on 2/5/19. In addition, facility staff failed to obtain hot water and coffee temperatures since January 2019. The Findings included: On 2/5/19 at 12:00 Noon, a review was conducted of the facility kitchen with the Dietary Manager (Employee E). The temperature logs were reviewed. The food temperatures had not been taken for the breakfast or lunch meals. In addition, coffee and hot water logs had not been done since January 2019. On 2/5/19, an interview was conducted with the Dietary Manager (Employee E). When asked if the hot liquid temperatures were ever taken, the Dietary Manager stated, Oh, it's always extremely hot. The Dietary Manager also stated that the cook (Employee D) had recorded the breakfast and lunch temperatures. The cook (Employee D) was next door in the dinning room. She was observed preparing and passing plates of food to the aides, who served the residents. When asked if she had taken the breakfast and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-02-17 · tag F0576 — widespreadEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on Resident interview, staff interview and local Post Master interview, the facility staff failed to uphold Residents rights to receive mail for all Residents at the facility. The findings included: For all Residents receiving mail at the facility, the facility has failed to ensure the Residents right to receive mail on Saturdays. On 2/16/22 at approximately 4:00 PM a Resident council meeting was held and there were 9 Residents in attendance. During the meeting, 9/9 Residents agreed that there was no mail delivery on Saturday. Resident #1 stated that he had contacted the Local Post office and they stated it was an agreement the facility started a long time ago not to deliver on Saturdays. He stated that only the facility Administration could get it re-started. On 2/16/22 an interview was conducted with the Activities Director who stated that she is the one to deliver the mail to the Residents. She stated that there was no mail delivery on Saturday. She stated that there was something that was initiated years ago by the former Administrator. She further stated We get UPS and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-02-17 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and facility record review the facility staff failed to ensure the Residents right to examine the most recent survey results. The findings included: For all Residents and Family members the facility staff failed to provide survey results that were accessible to Residents, family members and legal representatives of Residents. On 2/15/22 at approximately 10:00 AM when surveyors entered the building a sign was noted in the lobby that read: Survey results located at the reception desk. The reception desk was approximately 6 feet from the sitting area where the sign is located. The survey results were not visible on the desk. There was no receptionist at the desk at the time of entrance. On 2/16/22 at approximately 8:00 AM when entrance was made by Surveyor C there was again no one at the reception desk and the survey results were not visible on the desk. 2/16/22 at approximately 4:00 PM, during the Resident Council meeting, 5 out of the 9 Resident Council members stated that they did not know where to get the survey results, and the other 4 stated they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2022-02-17 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and facility documentation review, the facility staff failed to post daily staffing information for Residents, staff, and visitors to see on one of three dates of survey. This has the potential to affect all residents. The findings included: On 2/15/22 at approximately 10:00 AM, upon the survey team's entry to the facility the daily staffing information posted in the lobby contained the date of 2/13/22. On 2/16/22, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed. The DON stated she and the Assistant Director of Nursing post the daily staffing and the ADON had failed to update the information. When asked what the purpose of posting the daily staffing is, the DON said, I really don't know, I just know we do it and where I came from did it as well, but I really don't know why. A review of the facility policy titled, Posting Direct Care Daily Staffing Numbers was conducted. This policy read, 1. Within two (2) hours of the beginning of each shift, the number of licensed nurses (RNs, LPNs, and LVNs) and the number of unlicensed nursing personnel (CNAs)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$27,885 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $27,885 — penalty dated 2025-04-22
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 3.0 | ≈ chain avg |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.6 | -0.6 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 86 homes this chain runs (chain average 3.0★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 86; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| QUINTO DELTA LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 89% | since 12/31/2019 |
| SKILLED VENTURE LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 12/30/2019 |
| TRYKO DELTA HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 67% | since 01/01/2022 |
| HUNTINGTON NATIONAL BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 08/15/2024 |
| KAMPMANN, LEANNE | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 03/06/2023 |
| LAW, JOSEPH | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/10/2020 |
| POSEN, MINDEE | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| HEALTHCARE SERVICES GROUP INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/29/2025 |
| MARQUIS LIMITED LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2021 |
| RELIANT PRO REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/29/2025 |
| GILSTAD, JOHN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/04/2018 |
| KOHN FAM TR GST EXEMPT UAD 3-25-13 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| NFR 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| RSBRMK HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| SK 2013 DELTA TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| UAK 2020 IRRV TR | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
| UKR CONSULTING LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2019 |
| WESTMORELAND PROPERTY 1 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2019 |
| YR 2013 DELTA TR UA 03252013 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in VA
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Virginia Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 495268. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2023-06-08, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.