Langley Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 240 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 59.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.60 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 14% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 70 beds and averages 66.5 residents a day — about 95% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.59 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.59 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.98 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.90 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.87 on weekdays — 25% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.35 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 48% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

24 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2024-10-03 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and staff interview, the facility staff failed to prepare, distribute, and serve food in a manner that would prevent foodborne illnesses. The wash cycle of the dish machine was not working properly. The findings include: The facility staff failed to ensure the dish machine was in working order. The wash cycle failed to reach a temperature of 120 degrees. On 10/01/24 at approximately 9:50 a.m., the surveyor observed two dietary staff (dietary employee #1 and #2) running the dish machine in the facility kitchen. The surveyor approached the staff and observed these staff to run the dish machine three additional times. During these observations the wash cycle never went over 112 degrees. The directions on the dish machine read minimum wash cycle 120 degrees. The dietary manager identified this machine as a low temperature machine and stated they would call maintenance and hand wash the dishes. On 10/01/24 at 12:00 p.m., the Maintenance Director (MD) was observed working on the dish machine. The MD stated they had cut the temperature up on the hot water heater and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review the facility staff failed to ensure that a resident and/or the resident representative had the opportunity to develop an Advanced Directive for 1 of 18 current residents, Resident #16. The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide evidence that they had offered Resident #16 and/or the resident representative the opportunity to develop an Advance Directive. Resident #16's diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure and adult failure to thrive. Section C (cognitive patterns) of Resident #16's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 07/09/24 included a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 10 out of a possible 15 points. Per the MDS manual a 10=moderate cognitive impairment. During the record review the surveyor was unable to locate any information to indicate this resident and/or the resident representative had been offered the opportunity to develop an Advance Directive. On 10/02/24 at 4:35 p.m., during an end of the day meeting…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0623 — isolated
  Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, clinical record review, facility document review, facility staff failed to provide written notice of transfer for 2 of 18 current residents in the survey sample. (Resident #19 and Resident #36). The findings were: 1. For Resident #19, the facility staff failed to provide the resident representative a written notice of transfer when the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] or 09/25/24. The minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 08/25/24 coded the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition (Section C - cognitive patterns). During a review of Resident #19's clinical record, progress notes read the resident was transferred to a hospital on both 08/02/24 and 09/25/24. A licensed practical nurse (LPN) note dated 08/02/24 at 2:56 a.m. read 911 in to [sic] transport resident to (hospital initials omitted) ER at 2:40 AM. Message was left on (family member name omitted) answering…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0625 — isolated
  Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. For Resident #19, the facility staff failed to provide the resident representative a written notice which specifies the duration of the bed hold policy when the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] or 09/25/24. The minimum data set assessment with an assessment reference date of 08/25/24 coded the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) score of 11 out of 15 indicating moderately impaired cognition (Section C - cognitive patterns). During a review of Resident #19's clinical record, progress notes read the resident was transferred to a hospital on both 08/02/24 and 09/25/24. A licensed practical nurse (LPN) note dated 08/02/24 at 2:56 a.m. read 911 in to [sic] transport resident to (hospital initials omitted) ER at 2:40 AM. Message was left on (family member name omitted) answering machine asking him to call the facility at his earliest convenience. Another LPN note dated 09/25/24 at 5:10 p.m. read Resident presenting objective Signs [sic] that she may have Sepsis and is Hypotensive…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, facility document review, the facility staff failed to ensure narcotics were secured in a permanently affixed compartment on 1 of 2 units, the [NAME] unit. The findings include: The facility staff failed to provide a permanently affixed compartment for narcotics on the [NAME] unit On 10/02/24 at 3:40 p.m., the surveyor and Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #3 checked the medication refrigerator on the [NAME] unit. This refrigerator contained a locked black metal box. The surveyor was able to remove this box from the refrigerator and place it on the counter. LPN #3 unlocked the box, and it was observed to contain 5 vials of 1 ml Lorazepam. On 10/02/24 at 4:05 p.m., the [NAME] President of Quality provided the surveyor with a copy of their policy titled, Storage and Expiration Dating of Medications, Biologicals, Syringes, and Needles. This policy read in part, Medications, biologicals, syringes, and needles are stored under proper conditions as directed by state and federal…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
  Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review, and facility document review, the facility staff failed to assist residents in obtaining dental care from an outside source for 1 of 18 sampled residents, Resident #1. The findings included: For Resident #1, the facility staff failed to obtain a dental consult. Resident #1's diagnosis list indicated diagnoses, which included, but not limited to Dementia, Spastic Hemiplegia Cerebral Palsy, Epilepsy, and Thrombocytopenia. The most recent minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 8/22/24 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status (BIMS) summary score of 6 out of 15 indicating the resident was severely cognitively impaired. A review of Resident #1's clinical record revealed the following documentation: A nursing progress note dated 5/30/23 at 3:19 PM read Resident [adult child] in facility and said [their] mom's mouth hurts. Writer let PA [physician's assistant] [name omitted] know . Resident #1 was seen by the PA the following day on 5/31/23. The progress note read in part On exam, [his/her] mouth…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0943 — isolated
  Give their staff education on dementia care, and what abuse, neglect, and exploitation are; and how to report abuse, neglect, and exploitation.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of staff education regarding activities that constitute abuse, neglect, exploitation, and misappropriation of resident property, abuse prevention, procedures for reporting incidents of abuse and dementia management for 1 of 5 staff members reviewed, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #5. The findings included: The facility staff were unable to provide evidence of staff education regarding prevention, identification, and procedures for reporting resident abuse and dementia management for CNA #5. On 10/03/24, surveyor requested evidence of CNA #5's staff education completed since hire. CNA #5 had been employed with the facility since September 2023. On 10/03/24 at 2:20 PM, surveyor spoke with the [NAME] President (VP) of Quality and VP of Nursing Services regarding CNA #5's education records. VP of Quality stated they could not locate any training records since hire for CNA #5. VP of Nursing Services stated the CNA…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-10-03 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
  Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview and facility document review, the facility staff failed to provide evidence of a minimum of 12 hours of annual training for 1 of 5 sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA), CNA #5. The findings included: The facility staff were unable to provide evidence of at least 12 hours of annual training for CNA #5. On 10/03/24, surveyor requested evidence of CNA #5's staff trainings completed since hire. CNA #5 had been employed with the facility since September 2023. On 10/03/24 at 2:20 PM, surveyor spoke with the [NAME] President (VP) of Quality and VP of Nursing Services regarding CNA #5's training records. VP of Quality stated they could not locate any training records since hire for CNA #5. VP of Nursing Services stated the CNA had been removed from the schedule and could not return to work until all required trainings were completed. Surveyor requested and received the Facility assessment dated [DATE] which read in part .Required in-service training for nurse aides. In-service training…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, the facility staff failed to maintain a complete and accurate medical record for one of 35 residents in the closed record sample, resident # 311. The findings included: Resident # 311's diagnoses included but were not limited to muscle weakness, osteoarthritis, bradycardia, and dementia. The minimum data set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of 11/29/22 assigned the resident a brief interview for mental status score of 3 out of 15 indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. According to the MDS data the resident was dependant for transfers and non-ambulatory without at least extensive assistance. The care plan for resident # 311 was reviewed. A problem statement read, (resident) has a potential to fall (High Risk) R/T: Reduced mobility, History of falls and poor safety awareness, Impulsive behavior, Dementia- cognitive impairment, restlessness. During a review of the progress notes, the following was noted on 1/16/24 at 6:40 AM, resident up through the night and continue to try and get…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2021-04-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review and facility document review, it was determined that facility staff failed to revise the care plan for 3 of 28 residents in the survey sample to reflect that Resident #26 was receiving hospice services; Resident #12's Foley catheter had been discontinued; and Resident #4, acquired left heel pressure ulcer The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to revise the comprehensive care plan for to reflect hospice services for Resident #26. Resident #26 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to muscle weakness, Alzheimer's disease, unspecified dementia with behavioral disturbance, and history of malignant melanoma of the skin. Resident #26's most recent MDS (minimum data set) assessment was a significant change assessment with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 3/5/21. Resident #26 was coded as being severely impaired in the ability to make daily decisions on the Staff Interview for Mental Status…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 30% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA