Newport Post Acute

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

52.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 242 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 74 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 60 beds and averages 55.4 residents a day — about 92% occupied, or roughly 5 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.39 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.77 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.81 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.94 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.95 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

27 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 17 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · E2025-03-19 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — pattern
  Keep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, staff interviews, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to ensure that resident care information was not posted to be viewed in their room for 2 of 23 residents (Resident #27 and 36), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #27 was originally admitted to the facility 8/29/23 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included stroke, dysphagia and adult failure to thrive. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/15/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 6 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #27's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. On 3/12/25 at approximately 4:10 PM a sign was observed above the head of the bed of Resident #27. The sign stated no straws. A review of the physician's orders failed to reveal an order for no straws and a review of the person-centered care plan dated 9/6/2023 - Present failed to identify and have interventions related to no use of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — pattern
  Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interview, staff interview, and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to provide the necessary behavioral health services for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #30), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #30 was originally admitted to the facility 8/19/24 after an acute care hospital stay. The admission diagnoses included; congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, pain in left shoulder, and essential hypertension. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/17/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #30's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 3/11/25 at 1:50 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #30. Resident #30 stated, How do you think I'm doing? Would you be happy living like this? I lay here every day looking at this ceiling and they do nothing for me. I'm so fucking angry. On 3/12/25 at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, and staff interview the facility staff failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, homelike environment for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #244), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #244 was originally admitted to the facility 3/10/25 after an acute care hospital stay. The admission diagnoses included; spinal stenosis, paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, restless legs syndrome, and essential hypertension. The 5-day scheduled Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 3/13/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #244's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. On 3/11/25 at 2:10 PM during an observation tour for room [ROOM NUMBER], it was observed that there was a large area on the drywall behind the resident bed headboard that was dirty with flacking paint and gauges in the wall. It was also observed that the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, staff interviews, and clinical record reviews, the facility staff failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan for 2 of 23 residents (Resident #27 and #34), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. The facility staff failed to develop a person-centered comprehensive care plan to include to dysphagia for Resident #27. Resident #27 was originally admitted to the facility 8/29/23 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included stroke, dysphagia and adult failure to thrive. The significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 12/15/24 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 6 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #27's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. On 3/12/25 at approximately 4:10 PM a sign was observed above the head of the bed of Resident #27. The sign stated no straws. A review of the physician's orders…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to follow physician's order to ensure an abdominal binder was applied on a resident's abdomen to prevent pulling and or tugging of resident's peg tube for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #34), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #34 was originally admitted to the facility 12/27/24 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Other disorders of plasma protein metabolism. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/22/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 00 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #34 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. In sectionGG(Functional Abilities Goals) the resident was coded as dependent with oral care, personal hygiene, toileting hygiene and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on resident interview, staff interview, and a clinical record review, the facility staff failed to supervise each resident to prevent avoidable falls for 2 of 23 residents (Resident #36 and 294), in the survey sample. The findings included: 1. Resident #36 was originally admitted to the facility 1/9/25 after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included spinal stenosis. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/15/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #36's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. The MDS assessment was not coded for toileting transfers due to her medical condition or safety concerns. On 3/13/25 at approximately 2:05 PM an interview was conducted with Resident #36. The resident stated she had a fall in the bathroom after she had completed elimination and washing her hands. The resident stated she turned to get paper towels and lost her balance. She stated Certified Nursing…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, resident interview, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure an abdominal binder was applied on a resident's abdomen to prevent pulling and or tugging of resident's peg tube for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #34), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #34 was originally admitted to the facility 12/27/24 and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The current diagnoses included; Other disorders of plasma protein metabolism. The admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/22/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 00 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #34 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. In sectionGG(Functional Abilities Goals) the resident was coded as dependent with oral care, personal hygiene, toileting hygiene and shower/bathe self. The care plan…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0775 — isolated
  Keep complete, dated laboratory records in the resident's record.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on information obtained during the Antibiotic Stewardship task, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to have laboratory reports filed in the resident's clinical record for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #7), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility 12/18/23. The current diagnoses included a stroke and dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/11/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 1 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #7's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. During the Antibiotic Stewardship task, on 3/17/25 at approximately 1:05 PM, it was identified that Resident #7 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection on 3/10/25 at 11:35 PM, and started on an antibiotic. A further review revealed a nurse's note dated 3/07/25 at 7:58 PM which stated that Resident #7 was observed putting a cheeseburger with ketchup, mustard, and pickle into…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
  Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on information obtained during the Antibiotic Stewardship task, staff interviews and clinical record review, the facility staff failed to maintain a medical record which was complete and readily accessible for 1 of 23 residents (Resident #7), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #7 was originally admitted to the facility 12/18/23. The current diagnoses included a stroke and dementia. The quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 1/11/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 1 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #7's cognitive abilities for daily decision making were severely impaired. During the Antibiotic Stewardship task, on 3/17/25 at approximately 1:05 PM, it was identified that Resident #7 was diagnosed with a urinary tract infection on 3/10/25 at 11:35 PM, and started on an antibiotic. A further review revealed a nurse's note dated 3/07/25 at 7:58 PM which stated that Resident #7 was observed putting a cheeseburger with ketchup, mustard, and pickle…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, clinical record review, and review of facility documents, the facility's staff failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were followed while providing wound care for 1 of 23 residents to prevent the spread of infection (Resident #10), in the survey sample. The findings included: Resident #10 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted [DATE] after an acute care hospital stay. The resident has never been discharged from the facility. The current diagnoses included; Pressure Injury of bilateral heels. The quarterly revision, Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an assessment reference date (ARD) of 2/28/25 coded the resident as completing the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) and scoring 15 out of a possible 15. This indicated Resident #10 cognitive abilities for daily decision making were intact. The care plan read that Resident #10 has a bilateral pressure injuries to his heels. Focus: The goal for the resident is that the size of the ulcer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to MARQUIS HEALTH SERVICES — 87 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 25 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 21% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in VA