Woodward Hills Health and Rehabilitation Center
39312 Woodward Ave, Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304 · For profit - Corporation · 190 certified beds · (248) 644-5522 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited May 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 6 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (64) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $56,072 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-05)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 7.2% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 5.6% | 5.4% | 5.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 9.9% | 4.3% | 6.5% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 4.4% | 3.0% | 3.3% | worse |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 11.9% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.3% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 13.5% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 6.3% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.8% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.8% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 25.4% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.4% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.83 | 1.84 | 1.67 | typical |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 1.19 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 725 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 89.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 299 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.66 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 91% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 40% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.8%CMS range 47.1–54.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 9.2–13.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 89.0% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 76.6% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 73.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.2% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.8% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.5%CMS range 5.5–9.4 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.94 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 190 beds and averages 145.5 residents a day — about 77% occupied, or roughly 44 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.87 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.74 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.32 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.09 on weekdays — 19% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.87 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
64 citations, most serious first. The 16 most serious are shown; the remaining 48 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited beforedisputed · IDR2026-06-15 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake 3003663. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall for one Resident (R903) of two residents reviewed for falls. This resulted in R903 sustaining a brain bleed, a fractured humerus, and a fractured femur, which required surgery and resulted in increased pain and a functional decline. Findings include:A complaint was received by the State Agency on 5/05/26, which revealed R903 was admitted to the facility during April 2026, had a prior traumatic brain injury, and wore a yellow bracelet showing they were at high risk for falls. The report alleged R903 had a fall at the facility on 4/09/26 which resulted in fractured ribs, and a second fall on 4/19/26, which resulted in a brain bleed, fractured left hip, and a fractured left distal (lower) radius (wrist fracture). It was reported R903 was wandering in and out of residents' rooms on the night of their fall, in the early morning (on 4/19/26), which contributed to the major injuries. The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-08-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is or complaint # 2573833Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews, the facility failed to follow a transfer status and fall protocol for one resident (R303) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in R303 obtaining a serious injury.Findings include:A record review revealed that on 7/8/25 R303 fell from bed while being changed and sustained a head injury and required a higher level of care. According to the incident report R303 was being changed by one certified Nursing assistant (CNA) and rolled out of bed and hit their head. R302 care planned as a two person assist for actives of daily living (ADLs). On 8/5/25 at 10:40 AM, R303 was interviewed, and asked did they remembered how they fell from the bed. R303, report that they rolled out of bed and remembered hitting their head but that was it, R303 could not recall the staff that was around. A record review revealed that R303 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the medical diagnosis of Traumatic Subarachnoid…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to prevent a facility acquired pressure ulcer for one (R59) out of four residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the development of an unstageable pressure ulcer (full thickness skin and tissue loss with obscured wound bed) to the left heel and sepsis infection from tight fitting shoes. Findings include: On 12/2/24 at approximately 8:55 AM, R59 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert but confused and not able to answer questions asked. The resident was not wearing shoes and had yellow skid socks on. A review of R59's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia, type II diabetes and atrial fibrillation. A review of the resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1/15 (severely cognitively impaired). Continued review of the MDS (7/5/24) noted the resident had no physical and/or verbal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R59 On 12/2/24 at approximately 8:55 AM, R59 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert but confused and not able to answer questions asked. On 12/4/24 at approximately 10:01 AM, R59 was observed attempting to get out of their bed. The resident had yellow gripper socks on, was alert, non-combative, but confused as to where they were and where they wanted to go. Their call light was out of reach. CAN S was asked to come assist the resident who appeared confused and was trying to get out of bed on their own. A review of R59's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Dementia, type II diabetes and atrial fibrillation. A review of the resident Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 1/15 (severely cognitively impaired). Continued review of R59's clinical record revealed, in part, the following: 5/28/24: Note Text: Resident observed on floor sitting on buttocks holding on to wheelchair .…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This cite pertains to intake MI00138070. R806 Review of an intake submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of surgical site dressing changes not being completed. Record review revealed that R806 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Spinal Stenosis lumbar region, Low back pain and encounter for surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system. Record review revealed that R806 Brief interview mental status(BIMs) was a 13 and the minimum data set(MDS) showed that they needed moderate assistance with activities of daily living(ADLs). Record review revealed that R806 on 6/21/23 has a spinal stenosis lumbar incision with several sutures. Record review revealed that on 6/25/23 a treatment and care plan was put in place for the surgical site. Record review revealed on 6/27/23 there was a progress note R806 was started on oral antibiotics (for infection) for the surgical site. On 9/20/2023 at 11am Nurse D was interviewed for if there was a care plan or treatment ordered for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): MI00136632 and MI00137232. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent and comprehensive skin assessments and implement interventions for two (R811 and R820) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers(PU), resulting in R820 developing an unstageable (the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) PU and R811 developing multiple PU's. Findings include: On 9/20/23 around 11:30AM, R820 was observed in his room lying in the bed. R820 was asked if he had any wounds or sores. R820 believed so and that they (the facility) put a dressing on it. Review of the clinical record revealed that R820 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included weakness, multiple fractures of ribs right side and traumatic pneumothorax. Record review of the most recent Minimum Data Set(MDS) revealed that R820 needed supervision and assistance with activities of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake 2962105. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a change in condition was addressed timely for one Resident (R901) of three residents reviewed for change in condition. Findings include:On 3/20/26 at 8:35 a.m., a complaint was received by the State Agency, which alleged the facility failed to respond timely to a change in condition, when R901 experienced a significant medical decline on 5/16/25 in the middle of the night. The complainant described R901 was rushed to the hospital by the daytime nurse (on 5/17/25) after they received a phone call from the night nurse, who reported R901's breathing was fluctuating, their blood pressure had fallen, and they were not responding as normal. The complainant reported they received a phone call from the daytime nurse who told them they were rushing R901 to the hospital, as when they walked into R901's room they could tell that something was wrong with him, with his eyes rolling in the back of his head and called…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the storage of medications were labeled with name of medication and resident specific identifiers in three of five medication carts reviewed for medication storage.Findings Include:On 3/3/26 at 8:36 AM, the 600-hallway medication cart was observed for medication storage with Registered Nurse (RN) C and the Director of Nursing (DON) and revealed on the bottom of drawer two, nine loose medications and bottom of drawer three observed two medications loose with no medication or patient identifiers. Five vials of albuterol (medication for breathing treatments) were observed lying on base of drawer with no patient identifiers. RN C and the DON acknowledged loose medications are not proper storage in the medication cart and disposed per protocol.On 3/3/26 at 9:05 AM, the 100-hallway medication cart was observed for medication storage with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B and revealed on the bottom of drawer two, four unidentifiable medications and no resident identifiers and drawer three was observed with four unidentifiable…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-03-04 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of a cabinet surface, laundry equipment, and plumbing fixture resulting in an increased potential for contamination affecting all residents. Findings include: On 03/02/2026 at 10:10 AM in the laundry soiled linen room observed 2 plastic carts for transport of soiled linens that had debris and soil (used gloves, food wrappers, sticky brown substance) covering the interior bottom of the carts beneath the false fabric bottom. The same 2 carts were cracked and not smooth and easily cleanable around the top perimeter. The metal attachments (attached near the 4 corners of each bin) for the false bottom were worn and difficult to remove for cleaning of the bin and had worn to have sharp edges. During this observation when staff L was asked about these carts he said that some new carts had been purchased and were in use for clean linen transport and that more were needed. He indicated that the expectation was that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0554 — isolatedAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for safe self-administration of medication for three residents (R27, R134 and R138) of three residents reviewed for self-administration. Findings include: R134 On 3/02/2026 at approximately 11:26 a.m., R134 was observed in their room, sitting in their wheelchair. R134 was observed to have two antacid tablets in a medication cup on their bedside table. R134 was queried regarding the medications, and they indicated the Nurse had left them there for them after they received their morning medications. R134 was asked if the Nursing staff had left medications for them to take before and they reported they had. On 3/2/26 the medical record for R134 was reviewed and revealed the following: R134 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Congestive heart failure and Dysphagia. A review of R134's medications revealed the following: Calcium Carbonate Tablet Chewable 500 MG (milligrams)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-03-04 · tag F0576 — isolatedEnsure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident rights of one Resident (R127) of three residents reviewed for resident rights, related to privacy with opening their own mail. Findings include:On 3/03/26 at 11:03 a.m., a group meeting was held with facility residents to review the facility resident council process. On 3/03/26 at approximately 12:00 p.m., R127 reported two weeks prior they received their mail opened, which upset them. R127 clarified the mail opened by facility staff was a statement from their insurance company, Medicaid or Medicare. R127 said, It (the letter) was addressed to me. It was a statement about payments. R127 explained they had only been made aware by a surveyor there was a resident council meeting and concern review process. R127 said they were grateful to be heard. R127 was interviewable and oriented to themselves, their situation, place, and could tell time. Review of R127's profile revealed they were their own responsible party, with bills marked.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine bathing was provided for two residents (R186 and R197) of five residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL's). Findings include:R186 Clinical record review revealed R186 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had significant complications with diabetes including peripheral neuropathy (nerve damage causing lack of feeling) and resulted in a Left Below Knee Amputation (LBKA). R183 had declined in Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) related to mild cognitive impairment, but was alert, orientated and able to make their needs known. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessed on 2/9/26 revealed a Brief Interview Mental Status (BIMS) score of 12/15, indicating cognitive impairment. On 3/02/2026 at 10:10 AM, initial introduction and observation with R186 revealed them alone in room in their wheelchair. Their hair was disheveled; all fingernails were observed long and dirty. A strong odor of urine was noted which became more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2745432. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were available for administration and Physician orders were clarified with the Physician/pharmacy for one resident (R204) of one resident reviewed for medication administration, resulting in R204 having missed doses of their Physician-ordered medications. Findings include:On 3/2/26 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged R204 was not administered their medications according to the Physician's orders. On 3/3/26 the medical record for R204 was reviewed and revealed the following: R204 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Malignant neoplasm of brain and Malignant neoplasm of lymph nodes of multiple regions. A progress note dated 8/21/25 revealed the following: A progress note revealed the following: 8/21/2025 16:34Nursing - Progress Note-Note Text: Radiologist ordered Namenda titration pack for 1 month, then 10 mg (milligrams)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent two accidents with a mechanical lift and remove a malfunctioning lift from circulation for one Resident (R171) of two residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: On 3/02/26 at approximately 10:17 a.m., R171 was observed in their room dressed, standing in a standing wheelchair, with a laptop on a tray table. On 3/02/26 at 10:20 a.m., R171 stated, .Their (lift) machines are not operating well to get me up; their lift machines are broken. Some days I am getting stuck in bed and it started since last Tuesday (2/24/26) and they keep me in bed. I should always have two people to position me. For example, this morning the lift didn't work so they transferred me into the wheelchair with two-person (assistance). The lift would be ideal. R171 reported their nurse said if they haven't fixed the (Brand name stand) lift by tonight, they were not getting them up (out of bed) tomorrow. R171 said this made them feel anxious and guilty,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2745432.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement timely care and monitoring of a resident's suprapubic urinary catheter (flexible tube surgically inserted into the bladder through the skin of the abdominal wall) which included physician orders and nursing assessment for one (R214) of four residents reviewed for urinary catheters. Findings include:Review of a complaint reported to the State Agency (SA) included allegations that the facility was not properly caring for a resident with a urinary catheter.On 3/2/26 at 11:35 AM, R214 was observed in their room and a urinary catheter drainage bag was observed secured to the side of the bed and the urine appeared very dark. At that time, R214 reported there was blood in their urine and they were upset about the catheter site hurting and just wanted it out.On 3/4/26 at 10:20 AM, R214 was observed in their room, seated in a wheelchair. When asked about what the facility had done to follow up on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate PICC line (Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter) care was provided for one resident (R197) of one resident reviewed for Parenteral/IV fluids. Findings include:On 3/2/2026 at approximately 9:44 a.m., R197 was observed in their room, lying in their bed. R197 was observed to have a PICC line in their upper right arm with the dressing dated 2/25/26 (Wednesday). R197 was queried if Nursing staff are changing and assessing the dressing and they indicated that it needed to be changed. At that time, the med tape securing the dressing to the arm was observed to be losing its adhesiveness. On 3/3/26 at approximately 11:06 a.m., R197 was observed in their room, lying in their bed. R197 was observed to have a PICC line in their upper right arm with the dressing dated 2/25/26 and the tape holding the dressing to be coming apart. On 3/3/26 at approximately 11:38 a.m., R197's PICC line dressing was observed with Nurse Manager R (NM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 48 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Physician ordered laboratory diagnostics (labs) were completed and reported to the Physician in a timely manner for one resident (R52) of one resident reviewed for laboratory diagnostics. Findings include: On 3/2/26 the medical record for R52 was reviewed and revealed the following: R52 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Pneumonia and Sepsis. A Physician's order dated 2/20/26 revealed the following: CBC (complete blood count) and CMP (comprehensive metabolic panel) Dx (diagnosis): New Admit A review of R52's laboratory results in the electronic medical record did not reveal any lab results for R52's labs ordered on 2/20/26. On 3/4/26 at approximately 11:54 a.m., Nurse Manger R (NM R) was queried regarding the lab results for 2/20/26. NM R reported that new admission residents have baseline labs ordered and drawn upon admission, and that they would check for the results. On 3/4/26 at approximately 12:02…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide proper hand hygiene procedures during medication administration for three (R128, R53, R215) residents of four reviewed for medication administration.Findings include:On 3/3/26 at 8:12 AM, a medication administration observation was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) C for R128. RN C donned a pair of clear gloves at the 600-hallway cart without cleaning their hands. RN C proceeded to touch items on top of cart including a stack of clear plastic cups, poured a brown liquid supplement into a plastic cup, retrieved a pen from the top of cart, and opened the top drawer, donned with the same gloves, RN C proceeded to remove the medicine cup of opened medications and liquid supplement for R128 and proceeded to administer at bedside.On 3/3/26 at 8:58 AM, a medication administration observation was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B for R53 and was observed not performing hand hygiene prior to medication preparation and not performing hand hygiene prior to medication administration to R53.On 3/3/26 at 9:09 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2577284.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, homelike environment, in multiple resident rooms and throughout the hallways on the 100, 400, 500, 600, and 700 units. Findings include:Review of concerns reported to the State Agency on 7/31/25 included: the building smells like mildew, the facility is dirty, rain is coming down from the second-floor ceiling, which was not a new issue and happened every time it rains, and there was black mold on the pipes and in the ceiling.On 8/5/25 between 8:30 AM - 10:05 AM, observations of the facility revealed the following environmental concerns:At 8:30 AM, upon entry into the facility's main lobby, there was a strong mildew odor present, as well as in hallway towards the conference room.At 9:11 AM, there were three ceiling tiles off the main dining room towards the long-term care side of the facility that were heavily stained with water damage.At 9:15 AM, the end of the 500 hallway…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00151510. Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to address the concerns reported to the facility for one (R202) of three residents reviewed for grievances. Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented multiple concerns that the complainant attempted to get resolved with the facility staff unsuccessfully. The complainant noted the facility's failure to follow up and the lack of communication to resolve any of their concerns. A review of R202's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred out to the hospital on 3/27/25. R202 admitted with the primary diagnosis of hypokalemia and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A review of the progress notes revealed the following: On 3/26/25 at 9:35 AM, a Social Worker (SW) note documented in part . CM (case manager) had some concerns regarding the resident. SW asked appropriate parties to follow up . This note was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake #MI00151329. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's rights to be free from physical abuse during two resident-to-resident incidents for two Residents (R205, R206) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: R206 Review of R206's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/13/25, revealed R206 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including heart failure, lung disease, and arthritis. R206 required set up with eating, and maximal assistance with toileting and transfers. The Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment revealed a score of 15/15, which showed R206 was cognitively intact. On 5/27/25 at 12:54 p.m., R206 was observed dressed, seated in a bariatric wheelchair. On 5/27/25 at 12:56 p.m., R206 reported they had a concern with another resident. R206 reported they transferred to R205's room from another facility room a couple months ago, and the room was torn apart (messy) .so bad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #: MI00152670 Based on interview and record review facility failed to investigate (and follow-up) on an injury (skin tear) of unknown origin for one (R207) of three Residents reviewed for abuse resulting in the potential for further unidentified instances of injuries of unknown origin. Findings include: Review of the complaint received to the State Agency revealed that a family member/emergency contact regularly visited R207 during their stay at the facility. On 4/28/25 the family member discovered that R207 had a bandage on their arm when they removed the resident's jacket. When they removed the bandage they found bruises and a gash. They reported they were handling and assisting R207 with all their affairs. They did not receive any calls from the from the facility on how R207 sustained this injury. Record review revealed R207 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] for short-term skilled rehabilitation and nursing care. R207's admitting diagnoses included atrial fibrillation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00151510. Based on observation, interview and record reviews the facility failed to consistently complete wound treatments (R202), failed to timely identify a left heel wound, timely implement treatment to the left heel wound and consistently completed weekly skin assessment (R209) for two of three residents reviewed for wounds. Findings include: R202 A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) noted concerns of the facility failure to provide adequate and appropriate interventions to prevent and care for R202's wounds. A review of the R202's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred out to the hospital on 3/27/25. R202 admitted with the primary diagnosis of hypokalemia and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). A review of an admission Evaluation dated 3/13/25 at 12:38 AM, documented the following in part, . Sacrum- unstageable . Left heel- Dry . Coccyx- 2 stage twos next to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-05-28 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00151510. Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure an initial comprehensive consultation was completed by a Physician for one (R202) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include: A review of the R202's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and transferred out to the hospital on 3/27/25. R202 admitted with the primary diagnosis of hypokalemia and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the medical record revealed the following: A Physician Team - Progress Note dated 3/13/25 at 4:16 PM, that documented in part . DATE OF EXAM 3/12/2025 . initial visit post hospitalization . of multiple medical problems . This progress note contained an assessment and evaluation of care for the resident. The progress note was documented by Nurse Practitioner (NP) L. Further review of the medical record revealed no documentation of an initial comprehensive visit to have been…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00149390. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure treatment in a dignified manner for one resident, (R801) of three residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in feelings of frustration and being ignored. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency alleged R801 was moved from one unit to another and staff did not retrieve and deliver their personal hygiene wipes as requested. A review of R801's progress notes revealed a note entered into the record by Nurse 'B' on 1/12/25 at 11:18 PM that read, .Patient needs wipes from priar <sic> room on brae burn <sic> (unit) please relay message to day shift supervisor or maintenance . On 3/11/25 at 2:35 PM, an interview with the facility's Director of Nursing (DON) was conducted regarding the resident's request for their wipes and the nurses progress note in response. The DON indicated the nurse should have went to R801's previous room, retrieved the wipes and delivered them to their new room. A review of a facility provided policy titled, Resident Rights issued…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake #MI00149390. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was reported to the State Agency for one resident (R801) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of a complaint received by the State Agency alleged R801 was assaulted by a staff member. On 3/11/25 at approximately 10:30 AM, a review of a progress note entered into the record by Nurse 'D' on 12/28/24 was conducted and read, Nurse checked in with resident to see how he is doing and said he's doing better, and felt better knowing that the CNA (Certified Nurse Aide) that was working with him earlier was sent home . On 3/11/25 at 10:45 AM, in absence of the facility's Administrator (out of the facility) the Director of Nursing (DON) was requested to provide grievances, investigations, and facility reported incidents for R801. On 3/11/25 at 11:50 AM, a telephone interview was conducted with Nurse 'D' regarding their progress note on 12/28/24. They were asked about the note and why it documented a CNA had been sent home. They said…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00149390. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent an avoidable fall for one resident (R801) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in the resident rolling out of bed. Findings include: On 3/11/25 at 8:50 AM, a review of R801's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged [DATE]. R801's diagnoses included: paraplegia, spinal cord injuries, bipolar disorder, pain, foot drop, and post traumatic stress disorder. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed R801 had intact cognition, was non-ambulatory and dependent on staff for rolling left to right. R801's care plan for activities of daily living included an intervention dated 12/25/24 that read, .BED MOBILITY: 2 person assist . On 3/11/25 at 9:00 AM, a review of R801's progress notes revealed a note entered into the record by Nurse 'F' dated 1/27/25 at 6:13 AM that read, .CEna <sic> (Certified Nurse Aide) reports resident turning self for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-11 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00149390 and #MI00151121. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pain was treated per resident request and physician's orders for one resident (R801) of two residents reviewed for pain, resulting in complaints with care and untreated pain. Findings include: A complaint received by the State Agency alleged the resident's pain was not treated per their request and physician's orders. On 3/11/25 at 8:50 AM, a review of R801's clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: paraplegia, spinal cord injury, wounds, bipolar disorder, adjustment disorder, and post traumatic stress disorder. A review of R801's physician's orders revealed an order dated 12/31/24 for oxycodone (narcotic pain medication) 20 mg (milligrams) every four hours as needed for pain. R801's Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2025 was reviewed and revealed they received a dose of the medication on 2/16/25 at 10:47 AM. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-12-04 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen, failed to maintain the microwaves in the Cranbrook and [NAME] pantry in a sanitary manner, and failed to ensure food items were covered while transported through the hallways. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility that consume food. Findings include: On 12/2/24 between 8:40 AM-9:10 AM, during an observation of the kitchen with Dietary Director T, the following items were observed: There was a rolling cart with large portions of missing plastic edging. There was exposed porous particle board, and the surface was no longer smooth and easily cleanable. Dietary Director T confirmed the missing edging, but did not provide an explanation for why the cart was still in use. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 4-101.19 Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, NonFOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT that are exposed to splash, spillage, or other FOOD soiling or that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident's dignity for five residents (R53, R286, R292, R336, and R387) of seven residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: R53 On 12/2/24 at 11:09 AM, R53 was interviewed about their stay in the facility. They said they recently received a shower and while in the shower the Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) squeezed the shampoo onto their head and told them they could, do it themselves. R53 said they were able to shampoo their own hair, but found the CNA's attitude and tone to be, unnecessary and, rude. R286 On 12/2/24 at 9:37 AM, R286 was observed from the hallway in their bed. They were not covered fully with a blanket and their upper thigh and buttock were visible. They were asked permission to enter the room, and they said they were on the bed pan. They were then asked if they would like the door closed for privacy and said they would. At that time, Certified Nurse Aide 'W' was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain comfortable ambient air temperatures in multiple resident rooms (Rooms 100, 101, 103, 105, 107, 111, 201, 203, 205, and 207). Findings include: On 12/2/24 between 12:34 PM-1:05 PM, the following resident room air temperatures were measured with Maintenance Director V: 100- 69 degrees Fahrenheit there was a pillow observed over the window to block the draft. 101- 65 degrees Fahrenheit the Resident in the room was observed sitting in a wheelchair, wrapped up in a blanket, wearing a winter hat and stated she was cold. 103- 60 degrees Fahrenheit 105- 64 degrees Fahrenheit 107- 65 degrees Fahrenheit 111- 62 degrees Fahrenheit (vacant room) 201- 68 degrees Fahrenheit 203- 66 degrees Fahrenheit (vacant room) 205- 68 degrees Fahrenheit 207- 69 degrees Fahrenheit On 12/2/24 at 1:25 PM, the room air temperature monitoring logs were requested from Maintenance Director V. Maintenance Director V stated that room temperatures are monitored, but that he does not record them. Review of the facility's policy…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all controlled substances were accounted for and accurately documented for one (82) of four residents reviewed for pain management. Findings include: On 12/2/24 at 12:56 PM, R82 was observed in their room. An interview was conducted with R82 regarding his care in the facility. R82 reported that they often run out of his pain medication, which included oxycontin and oxycodone (Schedule II Controlled Substances - Drugs that have a high potential for abuse and dependence). R82 reported that when they run out, he had to wait up to 14 hours to receive the next dose and in that time, he would experience pain. R82 reported the last time the facility ran out was a few days ago. A review of R82's clinical record revealed R82 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis, charcot joint (a disease that attacks the bones, joints, and soft tissue in your feet, often…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-12-04 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a significant med error for one (R20) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in the resident receiving duplicate doses of a diuretic medication (furosemide) on three days. Findings include: A review of a document titled, Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations to Nursing dated 11/14/24 revealed the pharmacist made the following comments and recommendations regarding R20: The resident has duplicate orders on eMAR (Electronic Medication Administration Record) for: .Furosemide 20 mg (milligrams) once a day .Please clarify and discontinue one of the above orders . The document was signed off my the nurse which indicated it was reviewed. A review of R20's eMAR for November 2024 revealed the following: An order for furosemide 20 mg one time a day with a start date of 8/3/24. An order for furosemide 20 mg one time a day with a start date of 11/13/24. Both orders were active at the same time from 11/13/24 until 11/20/24. It was signed off on the MAR that both doses were administered on 11/17/24,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement physician ordered transmission based precautions (TBP) for one (R20) of one resident reviewed for TBP. Findings include: On 12/2/24 at 10:38 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) 'GG' was observed to enter R20's room and assist the resident with incontinence care and toileting. There was no signage observed on R20's door and no Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) outside of the room. At approximately 11:30 AM, R20 was observed near the nurse's station talking with another resident and they were later brought down to the dining room. A review of R20's Physician's orders indicated R20 was placed on Contact Precautions (TBP used to prevent spread of illness) for VRE (Vancomycin-resistant Enterococci - strain of bacteria resistant to the antibiotic Vancomycin) with a start date of 11/29/24. Further review of R20's clinical record revealed R20 was admitted into the facility on 5/13/23 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a referral was made for a level II evaluation (a comprehensive evaluation completed by the local community mental health agency) in a timely manner for one (R24) of two residents reviewed for PASARR (Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review) screenings. Findings include: On 12/2/24 at 4:01 PM, a review of R24's clinical record revealed R24 was admitted into the facility on 5/6/20 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: paranoid schizophrenia, vascular dementia, schizoaffective disorder bipolar type, and major depressive disorder. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed R24 had severely impaired cognition. A review of a PASARR Level I Screening form (DCH-3877) signed and dated on 4/19/24 revealed R24 had diagnoses of mental illness and dementia, indicated by marking 'Yes' in sections 1 and 2. The instructions on the form included If any answers to items 1-6 section II is 'Yes, send ONE copy to the local…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has three (3) deficient practice statements (DPS). DPS #1 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to timely identify and assess a facial bruise for one (R36) of four residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: On 12/2/24 at approximately 8:59 AM, R36 was observed lying in bed. The resident had a brownish bruise below their left eye. Behind the resident's bed was a document that noted the resident was a two person assist for bed transfers. When asked about the bruise around their eye, the resident thought they fell but could not specify the date, time, where and how the fall occurred. A review of the resident's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: left femur fracture, malnutrition and COPD (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease). A review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 4/15 (severely impaired cognition).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate orders for peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) dressing changes and monitoring of dressings for two (R387 and R291) of two residents reviewed for PICC lines. Findings include: R387 On 12/2/24 at 10:32 AM, R387 was observed standing at the sink in their room, an intravenous (IV) pump on a pole was observed. R387 was asked if they were receiving antibiotics. R387 explained they were through a PICC line in their right arm. R387 was asked about the dressing over their PICC line. R387 gingerly took their right arm out of their long-sleeved shirt, pulling the shirt away from the dressing. The dressing appeared to be mostly hanging loose, only attached at the top part, the rest of the clear dressing was not adhered to R387's arm. Review of the clinical record revealed R387 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: cutaneous abscess of right foot, cellulitis of right lower limb and long term…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-04 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow-up for guardianship for one resident (R49) of one resident reviewed for guardianship. Findings include: On 12/4/24 at 11:51 AM, a review of R49's clinical revealed a competency evaluation dated 10/18/24 signed by two physicians indicated R49 was not competent to make complex medical decisions, provide informed consent, or participate in decisions regarding their financial affairs. A progress note dated 10/17/24 entered into the record by Social Work Director 'O' was reviewed and read, .(R49's son) made aware that resident was seen for capacity evaluation and deemed incapable of making medical and financial decisions at this time. (R49's son) understands that a guardian will need to be appointed and states he will go to the court on 10/21 and file for emergency guardianship appointment. SW (Social Work) will cont (continue) to follow up and assist son as needed. On 12/4/24 at 12:19 PM, Social Work Director 'O' was asked to provide any documentation or evidence they had followed up with R49's son for guardianship. No…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure monthly drug regimen reviews conducted by the consultant pharmacist were reviewed by the medication provider for recommendations to act on for one (R3) out of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: A review of R3's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: chronic respiratory failure, chronic kidney disease and type II diabetes. A review of R3's drug regimen reviews revealed the Consultant Pharmacist reviewed R3's medication on 7/8/24 and noted irregularities and/or recommendations. A review of R3's clinical record revealed no report that indicated what the identified irregularities or recommendations were. On 12/4/24 at approximately 3:00 PM an interview and record review were conducted with Director of Nursing/Administrator in Training (AIT) A. AIT A reported that all responses to the consulting pharmacist should be located in the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolatedProvide or obtain dental services for each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00148355 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to timely provide follow-up dental services to one (R25) out of two residents reviewed for dental services. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged R25 was not receiving timely dental services. On 12/3/24 at approximately 2:05 PM, R25 was observed sitting in their room. They were alert and able to answer all questions asked. R25 reported that they had been at the hospital for about two weeks and just returned to the facility. When asked about care in the facility, including, dental services, R25 reported they had not seen a dentist in a long time and would like to see one. R25 opened their mouth and noted that they were missing teeth on their lower/bottom area and wear dentures on their top and were eager to get bottom dentures if possible. A review of R25's clinical record was conducted on 12/3/24 at approximately 2:15 PM. The review revealed the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-12-04 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer the 2024-2025 seasonal influenza (flu)vaccine to one resident (R49) of five residents reviewed for influenza vaccines. Findings include: On 12/4/24 at 11:39 AM, a review of R49's immunization records in the electronic medical record were reviewed. The last documented entry for the influenza vaccine was documented 9/10/24 and indicated the 2023-2024 seasonal vaccine was not offered because they admitted to the facility after the influenza season. There was no evidence they had been offered the 2024-2025 vaccine at the beginning of the new flu season. On 12/4/24 at 12:24 PM, an interview as conducted with Infection Control Preventionist 'BB'. They acknowledged it had not been offered or administered and they would follow up on it. A review of a facility provided policy titled, Vaccination of Residents Upon Admission dated 10/2023 was conducted but did not address offering of the influenza vaccine upon the start of the new flu season, between October 1st and March 31st each year.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00143872 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure skin assessments were documented, completed accurately and timely for one resident (R901) of two residents reviewed for changes in condition. Findings include: On 5/28/24 a complaint submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged the facility was not monitoring R901's skin appropriately. On 5/28/24 at approximately 9:51 a.m., R901 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R901 was queried if they had been sent to the hospital recently and they indicated they had. R901 was queried if they remembered why they were sent to the hospital and they indicated they were sick but were unable to recall the reason. On 5/28/24 the medical record for R901 was reviewed and revealed the following: R901 was Initially admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses of Metabolic Encephalopathy and Cellullitis of right lower limb (4/12/24) and Sepsis (4/12/24). R901 was last readmitted from the hospital…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-07 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — patternProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #: MI00142021, MI00142120, and MI00141180 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely medically related social services and follow up to address behavior changes, care planning reviews, and discharge planning for three (R901, 907, and 910) of four residents reviewed for social services. Findings include: R901 A review of the medical record revealed R901 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled nursing and rehabilitation services, after hospitalization for back surgery that resulted from a fall at home. R901 was hospitalized during their stay at the facility and readmitted back to the facility on [DATE]. R901 was living alone in the community prior to the fall and back surgeries. R901's admitting diagnoses included multiple back surgeries (kyphoplasty and fusion of spines at T11-T12, T12-L1, and L1-L2 level), urinary retention, and heart failure. Based on a Minimum Data Set Assessment (MDS) dated [DATE], R901 had Brief Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #: MI00142195. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to initiate a timely investigation for an injury (abrasion on left lower extremity) of unknown origin for one (R908) of two Residents reviewed for abuse with potential for further injuries of unknown origin/abuse. A record review revealed R908's most recent readmission to facility was on 7/14/22. R908's admitting diagnoses included dementia, unspecified psychosis, anxiety disorder, and history of multiple falls. Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R908 had severe cognitive impairment. R908 needed extensive staff assistance with their mobility in bed, transfers, and Activities of Daily Living (ADLs) such as dressing, bathing etc. An initial observation was completed on 2/5/24, at approximately 10:10 AM. R908 was observed in their bed with their eyes closed. R908 was not dressed, and they were wearing facility provided gown. R908 had a bandage wrapped on their left lower…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0554 — patternAllow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure six residents (R34, R49, R60, R63, R80 and R94) of six residents reviewed for medications were assessed for the safe self-administration of medication and to have medication kept at the bedside, resulting in the potential for mismanagement of medication and potential for adverse side effects. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Self Administration of Drugs dated 5/2018: .If a resident desires to participate in self-administration, the interdisciplinary team shall assess the competence of the resident to participate, by completing a Self-Administration of Medication Assessment .Based on the interdisciplinary team's review, the decision is made as to whether or not the resident is a candidate for self-administration. This will be recorded on the Self-Administration of Medication Assessment form .In addition, if the resident's BIMS - (mental exam) is less than 13 this will also deem the resident inappropriate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — patternReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were accessible to four residents (R39, R73, R95 and R111) and an appropriate bed was provided to one resident (R446) of five residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Call Light Accessibility and Timely Response dated 8/16/2023: .Staff will ensure the call light is plugged in, functioning, within reach of residents, and secured, as needed . R95: On 10/3/23 at 1:00 PM, R95 was observed laying in bed fanning themselves while complaining about being very hot (the facility's air conditioner currently broken). At that time, the call light was observed wrapped around the wall unit. When asked how they would ask for help if they needed it, R95 reported, I can't find it. (call light). When informed it was hooked around the wall unit, R95 reported, How am I supposed to reach that?. R111: On 10/3/23 at 1:05 PM, R111 was observed laying in bed and when asked how…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete routine showers for three Residents (R4, R60 and R98) of four reviewed for activities of daily living (ADLs). Findings include: On 10/3/23 at approximately 10:35 AM, R60 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert and able to answer all questions asked. When asked about care provided in the facility, R60 reported that often they have to wait for staff to answer call lights and also noted, that they do not always have enough staff to help them up for a shower. R60 explained that their shower days are on Monday and Thursday afternoon shift. R60 stated that yesterday (Monday 10/2/23) they only received a bed bath as their were not enough staff to assist with their shower. R60 reported that they would have preferred a shower. A review of R60's clinical record revealed the were initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and were readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: fracture of third vertebra, anxiety, type II…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00139622. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide wound care treatments and accurate and/or timely skin assessments as ordered by the physician for three (R34, R43 and R445) of three residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the lack of assessment, monitoring, and potential worsening of the condition and delayed healing. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Skin & Wound Policy dated 1/2022: .It is our policy to perform a full body skin assessment .as part of our systematic approach to pressure injury prevention and management. It is also our policy to follow the treatment plans for any wound / skin concerns as ordered by physicians .Treatments will be documented on the Treatment Administration Record .The effectiveness of treatments will be monitored through ongoing assessment of the wound. Considerations for needed modifications include .lack of progression towards healing .Changes in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient Practice #1 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the environment was free from environmental hazards including unsecured sharps containers (a hard plastic container that is used to safely dispose of hypodermic needles and other sharp medical instruments, such as Intravenous/IV catheters and disposable scalpels) and free standing oxygen thanks. This deficient practice had the potential to effect effect one resident (R98) and multiple other residents residing in the facility. Findings include: On 10/3/23 at approximately 10:31 a.m., a Sharps container was observed stored on top of a treatment cart, unsecured and free standing on top of the cart. The top was observed to be propped open without any Nursing staff around it. It was noted to contain sharps On 10/3/23 at approximately 12:56 p.m. another Sharps container was observed on top of a Medication cart unsecured and free standing. It was noted to already contain…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were properly secured and stored in three medication carts, two medication storage rooms and one resident room (R98) of 5 medication carts and two medication storage rooms reviewed for medication labeling and storage. Findings include: On [DATE] at approximately 1:28 p.m., Nurse O was observed opening a medication cart. A plastic medication cup with a gabapentin pill was observed in the non-controlled section of the medication cart. Nurse O was queried if that was normal process for storing a controlled substance and they indicated it was not. On [DATE] at approximately 2:01 p.m., a medication storage room was observed to be unlocked, unattended by any nursing staff. Nurse M was queried regarding the unlocked medication storage room and they indicated that it should be locked. On [DATE] at approximately 2:08 p.m., an expired daptomycin antibiotic with an expiration date of [DATE] was observed in the medication storage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R98 On 10/5/23 The medical record for R98 was reviewed and revealed the following: R98 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Depression, Insomnia and Congestive heart failure. A review of R98's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 7/7/23 revealed R98 needed extensive assistance with most of their activities of daily living. R98's BIMS sore (brief interview for mental status) was 13 indicating intact cognition. A Physician's order dated 9/25/23 with a start date of 9/30/23 revealed the following: Prazosin HCl Oral Capsule 2 MG (Prazosin HCl) Give 2 mg by mouth at bedtime for PTSD (Post traumatic stress disorder)/Nightmares A review of R98's October 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed R98 had not been administered their Prazosin in October. On 10/5/23 at approximately 1:51 p.m., during a conversation with Nurse Manager L (NM L), NM L was queried why R98 had not been provided their Prazosin that had the start date of 9/30/23 with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-05 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate communication devices and services were in place for one resident (R497) of one resident reviewed for communication, resulting in the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: On 10/03/23 at 09:48 AM, R497 was observed in bed lying on their back with several blanket sheets under them, daughter was present. On 10/03/23 at 09:48 AM, an observation of R497's room revealed no communication boards, pencil or paper. On 10/03/23 at 10:53 AM, R497 was attempted to be interviewed, however R497 does not speak English. There were no boards or means of communication to communicate to the resident. On 10/03/23 at 10:57 AM, R497's daughter attempted to translate however, it was still a challenge as to English not being primary language. Record review revealed the R497 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the medical diagnoses of need for assistance with personal care, heart failure and muscle weakness. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate catheter care was provided and Physician orders were obtained for an indwelling catheter for one resident (R5) of three residents reviewed for Catheters. Findings include: On 10/3/23 at approximately 11:32 a.m., R5 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. No catheter observed on R5. R5 was queried if they had a catheter and they reported that it had fallen out the previous night and nobody had put a new one in. R5 was observed with medical tape on their left leg that they said the Nurses never took off when the catheter fell out. On 10/4/23 at approximately 10:45 a.m., R5 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R5 was observed to have an indwelling catheter in place, draining yellow urine into a drainage bag. R5 was queried when the Nursing staff had placed the catheter and they reported that it was during the night on the previous day. R5 was observed to not have any anchor or securement device securing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-05 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a legally incompetent resident was provided a representative that had legal authority to act in the best interest/make informed medical decisions in a timely manner for one resident (R4) of one residents reviewed for medically related social services. Findings include: On 10/4/23 at approximately 11:25 a.m. R4 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R4 was queried if they had anyone that helped make their medical decisions and handle their personal business and they indicated that their daughter helped them. On 10/3/23 the medical record for R4 was reviewed and revealed the following. R4 was initially admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia and Heart failure. A review of R4's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 8/17/23 revealed R4 needed extensive assistance from facility staff with most of their activities of daily living. R4's BIMS score (brief interview for mental status) was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-09-21 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number(s): MI00133087. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure controlled substances were received, administered, reconciled appropriately, and discrepancies in counts investigated for one (R815) of four residents reviewed for medications, resulting in R815 receiving too much opioid pain medication and the potential for drug diversion. Findings include: A complaint was submitted to the State Agency that alleged the facility did not administer R815's patch appropriately. According to the complainant, On 11/9/22, the nurse but <sic> a 25 & 12 mg (milligram) patch on (R815) and on 11/11/22 the nurse put a 50 mg patch but never removed the 37 mg patch. As of Saturday 11/12/22, (R815) was disoriented confused and very sleepy lethargic and shaking cuz <sic> of the overdose of the patch. They then realized their error and removed all three patches on 11/12/22 . An unannounced, onsite investigation was conducted from 9/19/23 through 9/21/23. Review of R815's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number(s): MI00138623 and MI00138901. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the residents' representatives of a hospital transfer and black eye for two (R804 and R805) of two residents reviewed for notification of changes. Findings include: R804 Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that the facility transferred R804 to the hospital without notifying the responsible party. According to the complaint, the responsible party was not notified of the transfer until 36 hours later. On 9/21/23 at 2:00 PM, R804 was observed lying in bed. When interviewed, R804 was able to answer yes or no questions only. Review of R804's clinical record revealed R804 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] after a hospital transfer that occurred on 8/17/23. R804's diagnoses included: hemiplegia (paralysis of one side of the body), aphasia (difficulty speaking), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): MI00136323 & MI00132921. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to implement their grievance policy for two (R's 817 & 813) of three residents reviewed for grievances. Findings include: R817 Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (AS) documented concerns of the facility to have failed to follow up with care concerns submitted to the facility. Review of the medical record revealed R817 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, dysphagia, spinal stenosis, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and overactive bladder. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 (which indicated moderately impaired cognition) and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of emails submitted to the facility's Previous Social Worker (PSW) I from the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number(s): MI00139106 and MI00138623 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse, mistreatment and a black eye of unknown origin to the State Agency for two (R801 and R805) of six residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, revised on 4/13/23, revealed, in part, the following: .The facility will ensure that all allegations involving abuse, neglect .mistreatment, injuries of unknown source .are reported immediately to the Administrator and: Reported to the State Survey Agency immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made if the allegation involves abuse . R801 Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency alleged R801 was abused by a staff member at the facility, that someone put her phone in her drawer where she could not get to it, and that someone turned off the call light and threw it under the bed and said they were busy. An unannounced,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number(s): MI00139106 and MI00138623 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to investigate allegations of abuse and mistreatment and thoroughly investigate a black eye of unknown origin for two (R801 and R805) of six residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, revised on 4/13/23, revealed, in part, the following: .Once reported, the facility conducts a timely, thorough, and objective investigation of any allegation of abuse. It is the facility's policy to investigate all allegations involving Abuse, Neglect .Mistreatment, including any Injuries of Unknown Source .The investigation process includes: .Determining the purpose of the investigation and issue(s) to be investigated with focus on whether or not he allegation has occurred, the extent, and cause .Identifying and interviewing all involved persons, including the alleged victim, alleged perpetrator, witnesses, and others who might have knowledge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This cite pertains to intake MI00137696 and intake MI00139186 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document, accommodate, and provide routine showers to two(R802 and R807) of two residents reviewed for showers, resulting in skin irritation and the resident's feeling as if they had poor hygiene. Findings include: R807 Record review revealed that R807 was admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infraction, Parkinson's disease and overactive bladder. Record review of the Minimum data set (MDS) revealed that R807 had a brief interview for mental status(BIMs) of 12, (indicating moderately impaired cognition) and needed moderate assistance with his activities of daily living(ADL's). On 9/20/2023 at 5:00PM, the Director of Nursing(DON) and the Administrator were interviewed regarding R807 showers received during their stay at the facility. The documentation that was received contained several holes (missing documentation of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00132921 and MI00132451. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to implement adequate fall interventions for one (R817) a resident with a history of falls, resulting in a fall. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented a concern with the facility failing to implement interventions to prevent the resident's fall. Review of the medical record revealed R817 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, dysphagia, spinal stenosis, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and overactive bladder. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11 (which indicated moderately impaired cognition) and required staff assistance with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of a progress note dated 12/14/21 at 7:27 PM, documented in part . During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This cite pertains to intake(s) MI00137696 and MI00138070. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain adequate catheter care for one residents(R806) of one sampled for catheter care, resulting in the potential for urinary tract infections (UTI) and discomfort. Findings include: Review of an intake submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of Foley Catheter care not taking place. Record review revealed that R806 was admitted to facility on 06/21/23 with the diagnoses of Spinal Stenosis lumbar region, Low back pain and Urinary Tract infection. Record review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed that R806 had a Brief interview for mental status (BIMs) score of 13, indicting an intact cognition and needed moderate assistance with activities of daily living(ADLs). The MDS also indicated that there was a indwelling foley Catheter in place. A clinical record review of R806 medical orders and care plans revealed that there were no orders or care plans put in place for R806's catheter. On 9/20/2023 at 5PM, the Director of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-09-21 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number(s): MI00139106. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure respiratory care was provided according to standards of practice and the plan of care for one (R801) of two residents reviewed for respiratory care, resulting in R801 experiencing respiratory distress and a transfer to the hospital. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that on 7/23/23, R801 was asking for their oxygen and saying they could not breathe. R801 was observed without their oxygen applied and they were transported to the hospital due to low oxygen. Review of R801's clinical record revealed R801 was admitted into the facility on 6/29/23, readmitted on [DATE], and discharged to the hospital on 7/23/23 with diagnoses that included:congestive heart failure (CHF) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R801 had moderately impaired cognition, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-21 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00137355. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure labs were completed as ordered by the physician for one (R809) of seven residents reviewed for pressure ulcer care. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed R809 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, aphasia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented Severely impaired cognitive skills for daily decision making and required staff assistance for all Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of a Wound Rounds Note dated 4/25/23 at 1:57 PM, documented in part . has unstageable area at the sacrum as well as on the left buttock . has a very foul smell. The wound has been covered by an eschar . Assessment And Plan . Unstageable ulcer to the sacrum. Patient does have a very foul smell. We need to check for ESR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
“Disputed” is CMS’s own flag, not our reading: the CMS deficiency file records whether the home has formally contested a citation, and we reproduce that. IDR is Informal Dispute Resolution, run by the state survey agency that wrote the citation; IIDR is Independent Informal Dispute Resolution, a separate process before an outside entity, available when CMS has proposed a civil money penalty. They are different processes and we mark them differently. Two things to hold at once. A disputed citation is still a citation — it was written by a surveyor, it stands on the record unless and until it is changed, and we neither hide it nor discount it. And we cannot tell you how the dispute came out: CMS publishes that a citation is under dispute, not the outcome, so a tag marked here may since have been upheld, reduced, or deleted, and an unmarked tag may have been disputed and resolved before this file was cut. Ask the home what it disputed and why — it is entitled to tell you, and the answer is often the most informative thing on this page.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$56,072 in federal fines across 2 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.
- $17,345 — penalty dated 2025-08-05
- $38,727 — penalty dated 2023-09-21
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-12-26 for 20 days
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2023-10-18 for 7 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SNW LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 30% | since 09/01/2019 |
| OPTUM MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS. INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/09/2025 |
| MERCHANTS BANK OF INDIANA | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| EAST WEST BANK | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| PATEL, RAJAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| IMAM, KHALED | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2023 |
| JOHNSON, RYAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2023 |
| SHARON, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2024 |
| VERES, ERNEST | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/07/2023 |
| DUNN, CHARLES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/08/2025 |
| SHAH, HEMANT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/03/2025 |
| CHARLES FRANKLIN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| CHARLES WESTLAND LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| HEMANT SHAH 2018 IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| OM HOLDCO, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| OPTALIS LP INVESTORS 1, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| PAAR 108 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2017 IRREVOCABLE TRUST F/B/O AARNA R. PATEL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2017 IRREVOCABLE TRUST F/B/O ANSH R. PATEL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2020 IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST UAD 10-6-2020 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| RAJAN G PATEL 2020 IRR FAM TR UAD 12-3-2020 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 09/01/2019 |
| CONNER, MARIANNE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 22 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $6.4M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235556. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-04, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.