Belle Fountain Nursing & Rehabilitation Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

58.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 544 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 81.4% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 188 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.61 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 88% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 26% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 77.2 residents a day — about 85% occupied, or roughly 14 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.51 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.90 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.25 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 22% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.62 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 61% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

26 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 14 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff implemented safe repositioning techniques during incontinence care for one resident (R107) of two residents reviewed for accidents and supervision resulting in R107 falling from the bed and sustaining a dislocated shoulder. Findings include: On 4/26/26 at 10:53 AM, R107 was interviewed and reported they had experienced a fall a few days prior during bed care. R107 said there was only one staff member present providing care when two staff were required. In addition, R107 said that during the attempt to change the pad underneath them, they were rolled onto their left side, which was their weakened side due to a recent stroke, and subsequently fell out of the bed. R107 said they are not sure if CNA F pushed them too hard or if they fell from being turned with too much force. R107 said since the fall they have had pain in the left arm and left knee.On 4/27/26 at 3:00 PM, Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) F was interviewed and reported on…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · G2025-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
  Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to intake 2581458.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse from staff for one resident (R906) out of five residents reviewed for abuse, this failure resulted in the resident experiencing feelings of distress and emotional harm.Findings Include:Review of a Facility Reported Incident dated July 28,2025 revealed an allegation of a staff to resident verbal abuse incident.Record review of R906's electronic medical record revealed admission into the facility on 7/18/25 with a pertinent diagnosis of trochanteric fracture of left femur (thigh). Further review of revealed resident scored 15 out of 15 (intact cognition) on a Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) on 8/4/25. Review of Kardex (Care Notes) dated 8/7/25, R906 required ADL (Activities of Daily Living) assist x1 staff.During an interview on 8/6/25 at 10:57 AM with R906 it was reported that while attempting to get in her wheelchair, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A entered the room and questioned, What are you doing?…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include:On 4/26/2026 at 8:51 AM observed residue on the shelving surface of the food storage racks in walk in cooler. An interview with Dietary Manager (DM) H at this time found the shelves are cleaned. When asked how often, DM H indicated weekly or monthly.On 4/26/2026 at 8:53 AM observed the stand mixer with a plastic cover over it. When asked if the mixer is used, DM H indicated yes. Upon removal of the cover, brown buildup was observed accumulated on the upper portion of the mixer above the mixing bowl. DM H stated they would get someone to clean it.On 4/26/2026 at 9:15 AM observed red residue buildup on the inside nozzle of the juice gun. An interview at this time regarding cleaning of juice gun found the nozzle is ran through the dishwasher daily.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces,…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-04-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to have an active plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among all residents in the facility. Findings Include:On 04/26/2026 at 8:32 AM observed an inoperable water fountain in the front entrance of the building lobby indicating possible stagnant water. The electric plug was observed unplugged and hanging. On 04/26/2026 at 10:36 AM observed an inoperable water fountain in the hearth room indicating a possible stagnant line.On 04/26/2026 at 11:06 AM observed a therapy tub in the spa room A hall. An interview with Housekeeping/Laundry Supervisor (HLS) K at this time found they were not sure if it is used or not.On 04/26/2026 at 11:16 AM observed a shower room converted to a clean linen room in the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-04-28 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — pattern
  Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and implement written comprehensive advance directives (Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/CPR, Artificial Nutrition/Peg Tube, Artificial Hydration/ IV, and Diagnostic Testing) for six (R4, R6, R7, R9, R64, and R70) of 14 residents reviewed for advance directives, resulting in the missed opportunity to grant life sustaining or life withholding decisions known by the resident or legal representative.Findings include:R64 On [DATE] at approximately 9:00AM, R64 was observed in their room in bed. On [DATE] at approximately 9:30AM, R64 was queried regarding their advance directives. R64 said they did not recall making a choice or decision upon admission but would not want chest compressions if their heart or breathing would stop. A record review was conducted and revealed R64s most recent admission to the facility was on [DATE] with diagnoses that included fracture of the right femur, acute kidney failure, pain, dementia, delirium, and urinary…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one resident (R38) of one resident reviewed for dignity.Findings include:On 4/26/26 at 8:35 A.M. upon entering the facility walking past R38's room, the resident was observed in the first bed in a supine position (position lying on the back with face upward), with brief and entire upper thighs exposed in full view of the survey team and hallway traffic. The R38's arms were extended to the sides of the bariatric bed, and each exposed leg was positioned at the end of each corner of the bed. The resident's body was not covered and due to the resident's size (480 pounds) and the position of the bed, the resident's brief and body parts were seen from the hallway.In addition to the earlier observation R38 remained in the first bed without a Privacy curtain being pulled or a change of rooms. R38's body was within full view of the hallway showing an exposed brief and no covering of the lower extremities on 4/26/26…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolated
  Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide age-appropriate meaningful activities for one cognitively intact (R85) of four residents reviewed for activities, resulting in boredom, lack of interest in facility life, and loss of dignity.Findings include:R85-On 4/26/2026 at 11:23 a.m. R85 was observed resting in bed watching television. R85 presented as alert, oriented to person, place, and time and able to make all needs known. R85 has been observed participating in out of room activities, however R85 said they don't bother going to activities anymore due to there not being enough activities of interest to do. R85 stated, They (facility) no longer offer live entertainment or out the facility trips. It's spring and we should be planting a little garden or building a bird feeder. Instead, they have us doing ( kiddie shit) making me feel like an asshole. We should be having activities we enjoy. R85 pointed to the closet door of the bedroom. There was a [NAME] that had cartoon…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-04-28 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
  Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate monitoring of antibiotic use for one resident (R64) of five residents reviewed for antibiotic stewardship, resulting in the potential for the resident to experience unnecessary medication side effects or outcomes. Findings include: On 4/27/2026 at approximately 9:20AM, R64 was observed in their room in bed. R64 was asked about their antibiotic use for a urinary tract infection (UTI). R64 responded, they say I'll always have to take it because I'll always have a UTI. When asked if they had any current symptoms of a UTI such as burning with urination, R64 said no. A record review was conducted and revealed R64s most recent admission was on 3/14/2026 with diagnoses that included fracture of the right femur, acute kidney failure, metabolic encephalopathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, dementia, and urinary tract infection. Section C of the Minimum Data Set with an Assessment Reference Date of 3/20/2026 revealed R64 scored 12/15 on the Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate supervision to prevent a fall for one resident (R904) out of three residents reviewed for falls.Findings include:On 8/7/25 at 9:00 a.m., during an interview with R904, it was reported that on 7/30/25 staff let the resident fall from the bed to the floor while removing a bed pan.Record review of Nursing Progress Notes dated 7/30/25 at 2:18 a.m. documented, CNA notified writer that resident had a witnessed fall, resident was getting taken off of bedpan and CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) lowered resident to the floor. The writer observed resident lying on her left side on the floor.Review of electronic medical records revealed that the resident was admitted into the facility on 7/7/25 with a pertinent diagnosis of fracture of left ulna (lower arm). An additional review revealed on 7/31/25 that R904 had scored 15 out of 15 (intact cognition).Review of the care plan dated 7/16/25 indicated that R904 required two people for assistance with bed mobility. Review of the Kardex (care notes) R904 was a two person…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-03-12 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — widespread
  Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an adequate supply of emergency food was available. Findings include: On 3/10/25 at 12:00 PM, an observation and interview regarding the facility's emergency food supply was conducted with Dietary Manager (DM) A. A section in the dry food storage room was delineated by a sign that read, EMERGENCY FOOD DO NOT TOUCH!! DM A stated, They (kitchen staff) have been told not to use the emergency food. DM A said emergency food items were obtained from a commercial food supply company and provided a list of emergency foods that should be on hand. The emergency food supply list was compared to the foods currently available in the emergency food area, and the following items were not available: chicken noodle soup, cheese sauce, and green beans. DM A provided a policy titled, Disaster and Emergency Planning for Food Service, dated 2/3/23, that documented in part the following: The facility provides a disaster and emergency plan to ensure that the food service department will have on hand adequate food, water and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure pans were cleaned and air dried before stacking; 2. Properly date-label food in the kitchen; 3. Ensure food items past the use-by-date were not stored with active food; 4. Store cartons of milk in a manner to avoid splash from mop water; and 6. Adequately clean the air gap basin. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the kitchen, resulting in the increased potential for food borne illness. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 3/10/25 at 8:45 AM with Dietary Manager (DM) A, the following was observed: 1. Two wet ½ pans and one ½ pan soiled with food debris were observed nestled and stored with clean pans in the clean pot/pan storage area. 2. Inside of the three-door cooler contained, a.) two opened 16-ounce containers of chicken base and one opened 16-ounce container of vegetable base which were not labeled with an expiration date; b.) a box with 15 four-ounce containers of apple juice which all expired November 2024; and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-12 · tag F0655 — isolated
  Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a care plan for a communication deficit was developed and implemented for one resident (R282) of nineteen residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: On 3/10/2025 at 10:40 a.m., R282 was observed in room, alert and sitting on the bed with multiple sheets of writing paper and three ink pens on the bed side table. During an interview, R282 stated, If you are talking to me, you have to write it down because I cannot hear you. R282 pointed to the right ear and stated, This hearing aid I have is useless and I can't hear with it. On a handwritten note, R282 was asked how the hearing loss affects your communication and interaction with others. R282 stated, I avoid being around a crowd of people because I cannot communicate and interact with them. I wish I can try (Name Brand) for hearing aids, maybe they would work better. My ears have ringing sounds sometimes and I cannot hear my phone calls. On 3/12/2025 at 9:29 a.m. Unit…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$4,194 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

• $4,194 — penalty dated 2023-10-17

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 19 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $1.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 10% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI