No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Whitehall

916 East Lewis Street, Whitehall, MI 49461 · For profit - Corporation · 125 certified beds · (231) 894-4056 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Flagged for abuse3 actual-harm citations1 Medicare payment denial
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • CMS has flagged it for abuse
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 3 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (59) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
923 E Colby St · (231) 893-1744 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Walgreens0.9 mi
3284 Colby Rd · (231) 893-1361 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Aldi0.8 mi
3255 Colby Rd Ste B, Ste B
Park
937 E Sophia St · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
900 Warner St · (231) 894-4271

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased16.6%10.8%15.4%typical
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight6.7%5.4%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.8%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection2.4%1.5%2.0%worse
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.3%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.6%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened24.0%12.0%16.1%worse
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication20.6%19.4%18.9%typical
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine82.6%95.0%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers6.4%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control23.8%20.0%21.2%worse
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table16.6%14.8%17.1%typical
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.0%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine34.8%79.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission20.0%24.0%22.6%better
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit11.6%11.7%12.0%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.621.841.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.661.641.80typical

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

48.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 97 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

48.2%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
13.2%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
52.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.29U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.15hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 52.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 51 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.29 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 44% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF48.2%CMS range 38.2–63.451.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF13.2%CMS range 9.8–18.010.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge52.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge39.2%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge58.8%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened3.1%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.4%CMS range 4.0–10.77.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.71
RN hours/ resident / day
0.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.03
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.23
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.56
RN hoursweekends
57.8%
Total nursing turnover
68.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 125 beds and averages 79.5 residents a day — about 64% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.23 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.71 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.03 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.00 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.32 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.77 to 0.56 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

15
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-05)
12
at the previous standard inspection (2024-12-10)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

59 citations, most serious first. The 13 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's (R6, R7, R9, R15, R26, R34, R35, R58 and F60) right to be free from mental abuse and verbal abuse by R52 resulting in fear and physical anguish in the resident's home. Findings include:Resident #58 (R58)Review of an Face Sheet revealed R58 admitted to the facility 3/4/2025 with pertinent diagnoses which included heart failure, acute respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs) assessment for R58, with a reference date of 12/8/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R58 was cognitively intact. Review of R52's Progress Note dated 2/7/26 at 5:05 AM indicated that R52 went into R58's room and stood over her while she laid in bed. There was no documentation of this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor weights in a CHF resident and drug allergies in one (R89) and failed to implement and monitor ace wrap orders for one (R40) of two residents reviewed for change in condition, contributing to R89's death in the facility. Findings include:R89Review of a Face Sheet revealed R89 had pertinent diagnoses of congestive heart failure (CHF), diabetes and vascular dementia. Allergies: . Morphine (Opioid). WeightsReview of R89's weights revealed between January 2025 and July 2025 his weights averaged between 331 pounds (lbs) to 336 pounds. On August 17, 2025, R89's weight was 347 lbs. These weight values include but are not limited to:7/4/25- 333.1 lbs9/17/25- 343.9 lbs10/15/25- 357.6 lbs10/28/25- 365 lbs11/19/25- 359 lbs12/17/25- 363.5 lbs, next weight is 12/31/25.12/31/25- 350 lbs1/7/26-350.4 lbs, the last weight before expiration on 1/12/26. A 19.4 lbs average weight difference in 6 months and no daily weights since chest Xray on 1/6/26…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent further pressure ulcer development for 1 resident (R7) out of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers resulting in 3 facility acquired pressure ulcers for R7. Findings include:Review of an Face Sheet revealed R7 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and stage IV sacral pressure ulcer. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs) assessment for R29, with a reference date of 12/18/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R7 was cognitively intact. Further documentation revealed Active Diagnoses included I5600 Malnutrition (imbalances in a person's intake of energy and nutrients) and documented 1 unhealed pressure injury. In an observation on 3/2/26 at 9:05…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff were available to provide care and services for dependent resident's and meet resident needs including (R40 and R45) out of 87 residents who live the facility.Findings include:An early entry survey was conducted as a result of staffing concerns; because of the potential for ongoing concerns an additional early entry observation occurred on 3/5/26.On 03/05/2026 at 5:40 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) A revealed they currently had two nurse's and four aides working in the building. On 3/05/2026 at 5:42 AM, R52 was observed in his bed sleeping and wearing the same clothes he had been wearing for the past 2 days.On 3/05/2026 at 5:50 AM, Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) B revealed (Name of R52) behavior/mood had been better the last couple of days because they started him on some new medication on Monday night. I was worried about him because he usually is wandering, but he's sleeping tonight. I usually have to be on it (watching/always being observant) in order to protect my residents from him. CNA B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the Director of Nursing (DON) from working as a nurse on the floor. This deficient practice affects all 89 residents who resided at the facility.Findings include: During an observation and interview on 3/3/26 at 7:30 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was observed as a floor nurse attending a medication cart and passing medications. The DON reported there was a nurse that called in and was passing medications until relief was obtained. The DON reported she must work the floor sometimes.During an interview on 3/5/26 at 10:15 AM, the DON reported she has addressed staffing concerns with the Corporate Administrators who do not take in the acuity of a resident regarding staffing. They only look at the census. The facility does not have control over the acuity of a new admission or how many residents they admit because it is all pushed by the Corporate Administrators. The DON reported she will work on the floor on average once a week to cover staffing shortages. The DON reported she was not aware of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-03-05 · tag F0895 — widespread
    Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures to ensure an effective Compliance and Ethics program. Findings: During an interview on 3/5/2026 at 2:31 PM, Regional Nurse (RN) M reported that the parent organization of the facility has a corporate director of compliance. RN M said staff can report suspected violations to a hotline.During the interview on 3/5/2026 at 2:31 PM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) said she did not recall having training on the facility Ethics and Compliance program, but thought the online training was scheduled yearly. The NHA said she thought there were postings for the Compliance and Ethics hotline in common areas and indicated that the sorts of violations that would be reported were patient privacy/HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) violations, resident care concerns and staffing concerns. The NHA was not aware of any reported violations and had not responded to any alleged violations. When asked, the NHA was not aware who the facility Compliance liaison was and was not familiar…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-05 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — pattern
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document in the medical record in a complete, accurate, and timely fashion for 4 residents (R7, R52, R58 and R60) out of 19 sampled residents. Findings:Resident #7 (R7)Review of an Face Sheet revealed R7 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included neuropathy, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and stage IV sacral pressure ulcer. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs) assessment for R29, with a reference date of 12/18/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R7 was cognitively intact. Further documentation revealed Active Diagnoses included I5600 Malnutrition (imbalances in a person's intake of energy and nutrients) and documented 1 unhealed pressure injury.NOTE: Electronic copies of R7's progress notes were retained during…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-03-05 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of facility. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in satisfaction of living of residents. Findings Include:On 03/03/2026 at 9:13AM, observed on wall near the nurses' station on 200 hall, a wall mounted mini-split unit had grey and green crusted material on the unit. This crusted material was observed both on interior of the mini-split and the face of the unit. On 03/03/2026 at 3:00PM during tour of facility with Maintenance Director (MD) R, MD R confirmed observation of crusted material on the mini-split and stated the mini -splits in the facility are not in use during the winter and were scheduled to be professionally cleaned before starting them up for the year. On 03/03/2026 at 2:44PM, observed in the shower room on the 400 hall, tile coving at the wall and floor juncture was broken and chipped, exposing the wall to moisture and humidity from the shower and general cleaning of the room. There were sections of the wall (average length of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to honor the resident's right to set their own schedule for 1 resident (R24) out of 2 residents reviewed for dignified care. Findings:Review of a Face Sheet reflected R24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, adjustment disorder with anxiety and insomnia. During an interview on 3/2/2026 at 11:50 AM, R24 reported the facility is short staffed and a second shift Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) wanted her to go to bed for the night at 7:00 PM for staff convenience. R24 said she would like to stay up until after taking their evening medications and when she refused to be put to bed at 7:00 PM a CNA told the resident that they would have to wait for third shift to arrive because they couldn't accommodate the resident's preference for staying up a few more hours. R24 said that a few days over the weekend she didn't get her evening medications until 1:30 AM. An audit of a February 2026 Medication Administration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to evaluate 1 resident (R6) out of 4 residents reviewed every 14 days before as needed benzodiazepine (psychotropic) medication was renewed. Findings include:Review of an Face Sheet revealed R6 originally admitted to the facility 2/15/2022 with pertinent diagnoses which included chronic congestive heart failure, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and morbid obesity. Review of R6's Physician Orders dated 12/16/25, revealed an order for . Clonazepam (used to treat panic disorder, anxiety, and various seizure disorders by calming the brain and nerves) tablet 0.5 milligrams (MG) take one by mouth every 12 hours as needed for anxiety for 90 days. Review of R6's Electronic Medication Record (MAR) documented Clonazepam was administered 8 times from 12/16/25 to 12/31/25. Further review of the R6's MAR revealed Clonazepam was administered 15 times in January, 12 times in February and 4 times in March of 2026. In an interview and record review on 3/4/2026 at 11:27 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported she was aware that R6's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act. Findings include:Resident #58 (R58)Review of an Face Sheet revealed R58 admitted to the facility 3/4/2025 with pertinent diagnoses which included heart failure, acute respiratory failure, anxiety disorder, and major depressive disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs) assessment for R58, with a reference date of 12/8/2025 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R58 was cognitively intact.Review of R52's Progress Note dated 2/7/26 at 5:05 AM indicated that R52 went into R58's room and stood over her while she laid in bed.Review of a psychology follow-up visit dated 2/10/26 at 4:18 PM revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to implement and update individualized care plans for 3 residents (R6, R7, and R52) of 12 residents reviewed. Findings include:Resident #6 (R6)Review of an Face Sheet revealed R6 originally admitted to the facility 2/15/2022 with pertinent diagnoses which included chronic congestive heart failure, type II diabetes mellitus, anxiety, and morbid obesity. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs) assessment for R6, with a reference date of 2/3/2026 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R6 was cognitively intact.In an observation on 3/2/26 at 8:34 AM, R6 stated her skin is always itchy. R6 had multiple small scabs that traveled up R6's left upper arm. R6 reported facility did think it was scabies at one time, and the rash had not healed. Review of a current Skin Care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medication was administered according to professional standards for 5 residents (R3, R24, R38, R93, R94) out of 19 residents reviewed. Findings:R24Review of a Face Sheet reflected R24 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, adjustment disorder with anxiety and insomnia. During an interview on 3/2/2026 at 11:50 AM, R24 reported that due to staffing problems at the facility she did not get her evening medications until 1:30 AM over the previous weekend. An audit of a February 2026 Medication Administration Record including administration time confirmed that on 2/28/2026 R24's evening medication, scheduled to be given at 7:00 PM on 2/27/2026, was not administered until 1:26 AM on 2/28/2026. During an interview on 3/4/2026 at 2:20 PM, Agency Registered Nurse (RN) D reported that she did administer R24's evening medications at almost 1:30 AM on 2/28/26. RN D said she arrived at the facility at…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers for 1 (R45) of 1 resident reviewed for showers.Findings include:Review of the Electronic Medical Records (EMR) revealed R45 had pertinent diagnoses of contractures, morbid obesity, and paraplegia. During an observation and an interview on 3/2/26 (Monday) at 9:48 AM, R45 was lying in bed and not able to provide cares for herself. R45 reported she required extensive assistance of 2 staff for many activities of daily living (ADL's) due to her contractures. R45 had concerns of not enough staff available to provide her showers twice a week. Her last shower was 2 1/2 weeks ago and had to really push to get that shower so she could get her hair washed. R45 reported she gets a shower maybe once a month. Review of the Care Plan for R45 revealed she is to get a shower on Mondays and Fridays and is totally dependent on 2 staff for showers. During an interview on 3/4/26 at approximately 2:00 PM, R45 reported she did not get her shower on Monday 3/2/26. In an interview on 3/4/26 at approximately 2:23 PM…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent falls and injuries for 1 Resident (R52) contributing to increase and likelihood of further injuries and potential for harm.Findings include:Resident #52 (R52)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R52 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included Wernicke's encephalopathy (acute neurological emergency caused by severe vitamin B1 deficiency), dementia, delusional disorders, and hallucinations. Review of a Psychiatry Note dated 4/13/26 reflected, BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status, a mental status assessment) score declined significantly from 15 on 2/16/2026 to 3 on 4/14/2026 which indicated resident is severely cognitively impaired.Observation of the locked 100 Hallway on 4/13/26 at approximately 5:43AM, revealed that the hallway was absent of staff, it was quiet and the lights were low with one bright light noted at the far end of the hallway.Observation on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-12-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2695940 and 2690356Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that weights were obtained, and medications were administered in accordance with physician orders for 5 out of 7 residents (Resident #4, #8, #9, #10, and #11), reviewed for the provision of nursing services.Findings:Resident #4 (R4) Review of an admission Record revealed R4 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: adrenocortical insufficiency (adrenal glands don't produce enough cortisol and aldosterone.)Review of R4's Order Summary dated 12/2/25 revealed a steroid taper dose:predniSONE Oral Tablet 10 MG (Prednisone) Give 2 tablet by mouth two times a day for inflammation for 2 Days thenpredniSONE Oral Tablet 10 MG (Prednisone)Give 1 tablet by mouth two times a day for inflammation for 3 Days thenpredniSONE Oral Tablet 10 MG (Prednisone) Give 1 mg by mouth one time a day for inflammation for 3 Days.Review of R4's December…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-10 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to resolve grievances in a timely manner for 2 residents (R1 and R5) of 3 residents reviewed for grievances.Finding includedReview of the facility policy for Concern (Grievances) Process. Dated 5/31/24 revealed Concerns, grievances, recommendations stemming from resident or family group council concerning issues of resident care in the facility will be documented. Actions on such issues will be responded to at or before the next resident or family meeting. Concerns/Grievances may be voiced in the following ways: -verbal complaint to staff member including the Grievance Officer. - The staff member will transcribe the concern onto the concern form or assist the complainant with completing the concern form. The staff member receiving the concern form will review the specifics of the grievance on the concern form. - take immediate actions needed to prevent potential violation of the resident's rights. - Forward concern to the Grievance Officer…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to safely transfer with an electronic lift 2 of 2 residents (R5 and R6) reviewed for lift transfers. Findings include:During an interview with R5 on 9/10/25 at 12:05 PM, R5 reported that he did not like the new electronic lift to get out of bed. R5 was not sure why he could not still use the other facility lift. R5 said the lift did not fit him right and when they got him out of bed on 9/8/25 he hit his head on the bar. Review of R5's Kardex (care guide) dated 9/10/25 revealed, Toileting - use toileting sling and hoyer, 2 assist. Transfer: [brand name of electronic lift] with 2 staff assistance for transfers. UP 2 TIMES A DAY IN WC (wheelchair) AS TOLERATED, CERVICAL PRECAUTIONS-NO BENDING, PUSHING/PULLING, NO OVERHEAD LIFTING, NO BENDING NECK DOWN.Review of R5's progress note dated 9/5/25 at 14:34 (2:34 PM) revealed, Quarterly Therapy screen completed: R5 has had a decline in function, but at this time is not getting up in wheelchair daily due to left hip pain. Provider aware of decline in ability to complete PT…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2590962.Based on observations, interviews and record review the facility failed to provide proper infection control for 1 Resident (R1) of 3 residents sampled for infection control. Findings include:R1Review of R1's admission assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female with a last admission date of 3/22/25 and had diagnoses that included: Urinary Tract Infection onset 8/8/25, diabetes mellitus type 2, rheumatoid arthritis, lack of coordination, contractures, paraplegia (spinal cord injury affecting the lower body muscles and nerves) and retention of urine. She was her own responsible party. Review of R1's care plan dated 1/3/25 revealed, Resident has limited/impaired physical mobility r/t (related to) limited mobility d/t (due to) weakness r/t paraplegic (spinal cord damage). Interventions included: Bed mobility: Participates by: total assist with 2 staff. Eating: 1:1 feed at meals. Toileting - bed pan 2 assist.Review of R1's care plan dated 8/19/25 revealed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staff to meet the needs of seven Residents on the 100 hall (R202, R207, R210, R212, R215, R216 and R207) and five residents on the 200 hall (R204, R206, R208, R211, and R214). Findings Include: Review of the staff schedules provided by the facility for 8/12/25 through 8/14/25 reflected that one Certified Nurse aide (CNA) was scheduled for the 100 hall and one CNA was scheduled for the 200 hall for each day, afternoon, and night shifts.A review of documentation provided by the facility reflected fourteen residents resided on the 100 hall and eight residents on the 200 hall.R202 - 100 HallR202 was admitted to the facility 7/10/2025 with diagnoses that include Muscular Dystrophy and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected R202 scored 15 out 15 which indicated the Resident was cognitively intact.Review of the care plan for R202 reflected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-17 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00152587 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow professional standards for three of three residents (Resident #100, Resident #109, and Resident #113) reviewed for medication administration. Findings: Resident #100 (R100) Review of an admission Record revealed R100 was a [AGE] year old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of diabetes mellitus. During an interview on 06/16/25 at 9:00 AM, R100 stated that a week or so ago he was given an incorrect dose of insulin and had to go to the emergency room for monitoring. It was scary. Review of an incident report for R100, dated 06/07/25, reflected the following: (a) nurse read wrong record and gave resident (R100) too much insulin, and (b) (R100) was sent to the emergency room for monitoring due to potential risk for hypoglycemia ( low blood sugar). Resident #109 (R109) Review of an admission Record revealed R109 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to intakes MI00152587, MI00152791, and MI00152955. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide meal assistance to one of four residents (Resident #116) reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings: Resident #116 (R116) Review of an admission Record revealed R116 was an [AGE] year old female, last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of fractured right shoulder that required surgical repair, dementia, and lack of coordination. R116 sustained the broken shoulder in early May 2025 while out on leave with a family member. During an observation on 06/16/25 at 8:48 AM, R116 laid in bed, had a sling on her right arm and the breakfast tray sat untouched on the over bed table, lids were still on the plate, cups, and bowl, and the over bed table sat out of reach and out of sight of R116. Review of the task monitoring documentation system revealed that staff documented on R116's breakfast intake on 06/16/25 as resident not available.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) provide care following professional standards of practice and facility policy to prevent the development of a pressure injury, 2.) promptly notify the provider of a new pressure injury, 3.) promptly notify the DPOA (Durable Power of Attorney) of a new pressure injury and subsequent treatment changes, and 4.) ensure ordered treatments were completed for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #106) reviewed for pressure injury prevention/management. Findings: Resident #106 (R106) Review of an admission Record revealed R106 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: multiple sclerosis. Review of R106's Care Plan revealed: The resident has Stage 2 pressure ulcer (Partial-thickness skin loss with exposed dermis) to right buttock r/t (related to) Immobility and at risk for recurring skin impairment to sacrum. Date Initiated: 05/08/2025 .Avoid positioning the resident on right side. Date Initiated:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-19 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — pattern
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # MI00149091 and MI00150877 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician ordered wound care and provide care to prevent the development of skin breakdown/pressure injuries for 6 residents (Resident #302, #303, #311, #316, #317, and #318) out of 9 reviewed for alterations in skin integrity. Findings: Resident #302 (R302) Review of an admission Record revealed R302 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Review of R302's After Visit Summary from an inpatient hospital stay from 1/1/25-1/10/25 revealed, .Apply Zinc oxide to buttock 3 x (times) daily and as needed due to irritation in buttock region. Review of R302's Order Summary dated 1/10/25 revealed, Apply zinc oxide to buttocks 3x daily and as needed for excoriation every day and night shift for skin integrity. Review of R302's January Treatment Administration Record revealed the application of zinc oxide to buttocks was ordered to be completed at 7:00 AM and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # MI00150877 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) ensure residents received care and services following provider orders, 2.) identify and notify the physician a change in condition, and 3.) ensure complete and accurate medical records, for 1 resident (Resident #302) out of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings: Resident #302 (R302) Review of an admission Record revealed R302 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility from 1/10/25-1/16/25. Pertinent diagnoses included: congestive heart failure, irritable bowel syndrome, dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. During an interview on 03/18/25 at 2:10 PM, Family Member (FM) H reported R302's discharge orders from the hospital and the orders from the facility provider were not followed by the facility which resulted in R302's receiving poor care. FM H reported that R302's bottom becoming raw from excessive diarrhea from being given food that had gluten…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-12-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to effectively clean and maintain food service equipment, and date mark potentially hazardous food item potentially affecting 68 residents, resulting in the increased likelihood for cross-contamination and bacterial harborage. Findings include: During the initial tour of the kitchen on 12/08/24 between 8:18 AM to 9:05 AM the following issues were observed and identified to [NAME] V: Observation of the Walk In Cooler (WIC) revealed mold, mildew, grime, and debris on the shelving. located inside the and on the fan compressor grate. An undated container storing hot dogs were being stored on the shelving. Observation of the cook line area revealed the can open blade and holster have food residue and debris on them. Further, observation of the cook line revealed the lid on the commercial blender had a yellow/white build-up of scale/lime with a touch of black speckles that resembled mold/mildew. An observation of the Walk In Freezer (WIF) revealed ice build-up on the shelving, and on the opened/sealed boxes of food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a system for preventing, identifying, reporting, investigating, and controlling infections and communicable diseases for all residents, staff, volunteers, and visitors to prevent the spread of an illness/outbreak. Findings: On 12/8/24 at 9:20 AM, a copy of the last 3 months of infection surveillance/tracking (all illnesses) for staff and residents including line lists were requested. During the onsite survey Previous Director of Nursing/Infection Control Preventionist (PDON/ICP) S abruptly ended her employment with the facility on 12/8/24 and was unable to be interviewed regarding the Infection Control Program. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 10:28 AM, Regional Director of Clinical (RDC) X reported PDON/ICP S had been responsible for the Infection Control Program for approximately the last 6 weeks. Prior to that PDON/ICP T had been responsible for the program. RDC X reported PDON/ICP S and T were responsible for the implantation, oversight, and maintenance of the Infection Control Program. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide for the needs of four of four residents (Resident #45, Resident #67, Resident #62, and Resident #7) reviewed for accommodation of needs. Findings: Residents #45 (R45) Review of an admission Record revealed R45 was a [AGE] year old male, last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of Alzheimer's, lack of coordination, muscle wasting, and a below the knee amputation of the left leg. During an observation on 12/08/24 at 8:44 AM, R45's call light laid on the floor on the resident's left side of the bed, out of sight and out of reach. The same observations were made on 12/08/24 at 9:47 AM and 10:34 AM. During an observation on 12/08/24 at 11:47 AM, two staff entered R45's room and boosted him up in bed. During an observation on 12/08/24 at 11:55 AM, R45's call light hung down from the railing on the left side of the bed, just off the floor, out of sight and out of reach. During an observation on 12/08/24 at 3:19…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation refers to MI00147849 and MI00148347. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from verbal and mental abuse by staff for 5 of 24 residents (R8, R12, R35, R53, and R68), resulting in residents being verbally abused. Findings include: A review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, dated 3/24/23, revealed verbal abuse includes but not limited to the use of oral, written or gestured language. This definition includes communication that expresses disparaging and derogatory terms to residents within their hearing/seeing distance. Examples: name calling, swearing . A review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, dated 3/24/23, revealed mental abuse includes but is not limited to humiliation . Examples: statements such as . Take a shower, you stink . attempts to embarrass or tell on the resident . A review of the facility investigation report received by the State Survey Agency (SSA), dated 11/19/24, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation refers to MI00147849 and MI00148347. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and/or implement policies and procedures for ensuring the reporting of a reasonable suspicion of a crime in accordance with section 1150B of the Act and report within a timely manner to facility management and the State Survey Agency allegations of verbal and/or mental abuse by staff for three of 24 residents (R12, R35, and R53), resulting in a delay in investigating allegations of abuse and the potential for residents to not be protected from abusive individuals Findings include: A review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, dated 3/24/23, revealed verbal abuse includes but not limited to the use of oral, written or gestured language. This definition includes communication that expresses disparaging and derogatory terms to residents within their hearing/seeing distance. Examples: name calling, swearing . A review of the facility's Abuse and Neglect Policy and Procedure, dated 3/24/23, revealed mental abuse includes but is not limited to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) administer controlled medications following professional standards of practice, 2.) ensure medications were administered following the physician ordered parameters, and 3.) accurately transcribe/order a newly admitted resident's antipsychotic medication, for six of 12 residents (Resident #5, #46, #7, #2, #24, and #68) reviewed for medication administration, resulting in missed doses of medication, medication administration errors, and the inaccurate documentation of the administration of controlled drugs. Findings: Resident #5 (R5) Review of an admission Record revealed R5 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: pain. Review of R5's Order Summary revealed, HYDROcodone-Acetaminophen (Norco) Tablet 10-325 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth every 4 hours as needed for breakthrough pain management. Review of R5's Control Substance Record revealed that on 12/7/24 R5 received 4 doses of Norco. A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide quality care to three of three residents reviewed (Resident #14, Resident #3, and Resident #19) resulting in untreated significant swelling in the feet for R14, an order to change tube feed guidelines for R3 to be missed, and a delay in treating a urinary tract infection for R19. Findings: Resident #41 (R41) Review of an admission Record revealed R41 was a [AGE] year old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of seizure disorder, lymphedema, chronic kidney disease During an observation and interview on 12/09/24 at 4:30 PM, R41 laid in bed with eyes open and stated that his feet hurt. It feels like my feet are in gloves and the gloves keep getting smaller. R41 rated the pain in his left foot as really bad and reported intense pain if the foot was touched. R41 stated that he saw a lymphedema specialist in the past but has not seen the specialist since his admission to the facility. R41 had +4…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to intake # MI00148049 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of controlled substances for three (Resident #35, Resident #5, and Resident #174) of three residents reviewed. Findings: Resident#35 (R35) Review of an admission Record revealed R35 was an [AGE] year old male, last admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of diabetes mellitus, post traumatic stress disorder, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and left lower extremity below the knee amputation. Resident #5 (R5) Review of an admission Record revealed R5 was an [AGE] year old female, last admitted to the facility with pertinent diagnoses of dementia, anxiety disorder, claustrophobia, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Resident #174 (R174) Review of an admission Record revealed R174 was a [AGE] year old female, last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of rheumatoid arthritis, chronic pain, and diabetes mellitus. Review of an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and record review, the facility failed to utilize foot rests on a wheelchair for two of four residents (Resident #44 and Resident #62) reviewed for accidents and hazards. Findings: Resident #44(R44) Review of an admission Record revealed R44 was a [AGE] year old female, last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of left sided paralysis following a stroke and abnormal posture. R44 requires assistance from staff for bed mobility, transfers, and using the bathroom. During an observation on 12/08/24 at 11:45 AM, Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) AA propelled R44 down the 300 hall to the nurses station without the use of foot rests on the wheel chair. Resident #62(R62) Review of an admission Record revealed R62 was an [AGE] year old female, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of dementia, rheumatoid arthritis, and difficulty speaking. R62 is dependent on staff to get dressed, for bathing, transfers, going to the bathroom and can independently…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that pharmacy recommendations are received by the facility and reviewed by the physician for 1 of 5 residents (R53) reviewed for monthly pharmacy medication regimen reviews, resulting in the facility and physician not being aware of a pharmacy recommendation for R53 and the potential for an adverse outcome from medications and/or lack of assessment and monitoring of medications. Findings include: A review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review (MRR) Policy and Procedure, dated 7/11/18, revealed, It is the policy of this facility that: . 2. The pharmacist must report any irregularities to the attending physician, facility medical director and the Director of Nursing Services . the report is provided by the Pharmacist or facility to the responsible physicians and the Director of Nursing Services within seven (7) working days of review . A review of R53's admission Record, dated 12/10/24, revealed they were a [AGE] year-old resident admitted…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to secure unattended medication carts for three of five carts reviewed and failed to label opened medications according to industry standards. Findings: During an observation on 12/09/24 at 7:19 AM, (a) the medication cart labeled 409-416 was unlocked and unattended by licensed nursing staff, (b) the medication cart contained 5 loose pills at the bottom of the second drawer, (c) a Lantus insulin kwik pen prescribed to the resident in bed 416-2 did not have a date written on it identifying when the medication was opened, (d) a bottle of Lantus insulin prescribed to the resident in bed 407-1 did not have a date written on it to indicate when the medication had been opened, and (e) contained the eye drops brimonidone 0.15% for the resident in bed 415-1 and did not have a date written on it to identify when it had been opened. During an observation on 12/9/24 at 7:31 AM, the medication cart labeled 309-316 contained eight loose pills at the bottom of the second drawer. During an interview at the same time, Licensed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-12-10 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) implement an antibiotic stewardship program and 2.) ensure accurate monitoring and antibiotic use for two of 5 residents (Resident #45 and #5) reviewed for antibiotic use, resulting in inappropriate antibiotic utilization and the potential for antibiotic resistance. Findings: During the onsite survey Previous Director of Nursing/Infection Control Preventionist (PDON/ICP) S abruptly ended her employment with the facility on 12/8/24 and was unable to be interviewed regarding the Infection Control Program. During an interview on 12/10/24 at 10:28 AM, Regional Director of Clinical (RDC) X reported PDON/ICP S had been responsible for the Infection Control Program for approximately the last 6 weeks. Prior to that PDON/ICP T had been responsible for the program. RDC X reported PDON/ICP S and T were responsible for the Antibiotic Stewardship Program which included monitoring the use of antibiotics and ensuring clinical criteria was met, appropriate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the pneumococcal immunization per consent and the recommendation by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for three (Resident #18, #4, and #56) out of 5 reviewed for immunizations, resulting in residents not receiving the pneumococcal immunization. Findings: Review of the CDC Pneumococcal Vaccine Timing for Adults dated October 2024 revealed, .the minimum interval for PPSV23 is >1 year since last PCV13 dose and >5 years since last PPSV23 dose. Shared clinical decision-making option for adults >[AGE] years old-Together, with the patient, vaccine providers may choose to administer PCV20 or PCV21 to adults >[AGE] years old who have already received PCV13 (but not PCV15, PCV20, or PCV21) at any age and PPSV23 at or after the age of [AGE] years old . Resident #18 (R18) Review of an admission Record revealed R18 was an [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R18's Electronic Medical Record revealed that she was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-09-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #: MI00146305 and MI00146949 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to 1.) assess and monitor pressure injuries/wounds, 2.) ensure pressure injury/wound assessments were complete, accurate, and documented in the resident record, 3.) notify the provider and the DPOA (Durable Power of Attorney) of new pressure injuries/wounds, and 4.) provide physician ordered treatments/assessments and ensure treatments were in place for pressure injuries/wounds for 4 of 4 residents (Resident #7, #8, #1, and #9) reviewed for quality of care. Findings: Resident #8 (R8) Review of an admission Record revealed R8 was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Neurocognitive Disorder with Lewy Body Dementia. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R8, with a reference date of 7/2/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R8 was severely…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespread
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to: 1) develop and utilize an effective antibiotic stewardship program to ensure an accurate and effective program for tracking and monitoring antibiotic use potentially affecting all 79 residents who reside at the facility, 2) follow through with laboratory orders and implement antibiotic stewardship for 1 (Resident #8) of 2 residents reviewed for antibiotics/unnecessary medications. Findings include: Review of an Antibiotic Stewardship policy adopted 7/11/18 revealed: It is the policy of this facility that antibiotics will be prescribed and administered to residents under the guidance of the facility's Antibiotic Stewardship Program. This policy lacked the core elements for antibiotic stewardship as summarized by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) (https://www.cdc.gov/antibiotic-use/core-elements/nursing-homes.html#anchor_1616614363671). During an interview and record review on 2/28/24 at 2:19 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) discussed her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure acceptable standards of practice were observed during medication administration on the 400 Hall. Findings: On 2/27/24 at 7:32 AM an observation and interview were conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) D during medication administration on the 400 Hall. RN D was observed preparing medication for R27. RN D was observed removing oral medication from the packaging directly into her ungloved hand. RN D then dropped the medication from her hand into a medication cup. With the surveyor observing next to the medication cart five oral medications were prepared for R27 by RN D in this manner. RN D then locked the medication cart, cleared the Medication Administration Record (MAR) from the computer screen and proceeded to the room of R27. RN D was stopped before entering the room and asked about her handling of the medication for R27. RN D had no comment and offered no justification for this method of preparation and proceeded to administer the medication to R27. During an interview conducted 2/27/24 at 8:15 AM on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake M100140413 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly assess, document, monitor changes in condition, provide medication timely and accurately, and per standards of practice accurately document medication administration, and provide resident incontinence care for 5 residents (R39, R49, R11, R281, R8) of 5 residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include Resident #39 (R39) Review of a Face Sheet revealed R39 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and resides on the 300 hall with pertinent diagnoses of chronic pain, spinal stenosis in the lumbar region, diabetes, and hypothyroidism (low thyroid function). During an observation on 2/26/24 during initial tour at approximately 10:00 AM, the 300-hall medication cart had the computer displaying nine residents in the red, indicating their medications were not yet given within the ordered time frames. During an observation and an interview on 2/26/24 at 3:02 PM, R39 was room [ROOM NUMBER] lying…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-02-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow standards of practice for 1 of 1 resident ( R400) reviewed for tube feeding, resulting in the potential for contaminated equipment introducing pathogens into the resident, and the potential for choking or aspiration and the resident unable to call for help. Findings: Resident #400 (R400) Review of an admission Record revealed R400 was a [AGE] year old female, last admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses of multiple sclerosis and dependent on tube feedings for all nutrition and hydration. Review of Physician Orders for R400 revealed: NPO diet (nothing by mouth). Review of a Care Plan for R400 revealed the interventions: Be sure call light is within reach . encourage adequate nutrition. Offer small frequent feedings .Diet NPO (nothing by mouth which conflicts with previous intervention) . During an observation on 04/29/24 at 2:00 PM, R400 sat up in bed with a tube feed running. R400 had a thick white coating on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assure that a Registered Nurse was on duty for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week. Findings include: Review of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) PBJ (Payroll Based Journal) Staffing Data Report for the 4th quarter of 2023 revealed the facility triggered for excessively low weekend staffing and the No RN (Registered Nurse) Hours was not triggered. Review of requested Daily Staffing Sheets revealed on 12/30/23 and 12/31/23 there were no RNs on duty. In an interview on 2/29/24 at 3:15 PM, Scheduler/Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) L reported they do have some openings right now for nurses and aides and the facility is actively recruiting.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to secure controlled substances in one of two medication storage refrigerators. Findings: During an observation on 04/30/24 at 8:20 AM, the 300/400 hall medication storage refrigerator was unlocked. On the bottom shelf sat a clear plastic lock box that contained 1 bottle of liquid Lorazepam concentrate (a benzodiazipine used primarily to treat anxiety and a controlled substance) 2mg/ml (milligrams/milliliter). The top of the plastic lock box had been broken so that the bottle of Lorazepam could be reached without having to unlock the clear plastic lock box. This rendered the Lorazepam not double locked and easily accessible to anyone who gained access to the medication storage room. During an interview at the same time the Director of Nursing (DON) stated that the medication refrigerator was to be kept locked at all times. When asked about the broken clear plastic box that stored the bottle of liquid Lorazepam, the DON responded, I don't know. During an observation on 04/30/24 at 3:57 PM, the 300/400 hall medication storage…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-02-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R66 Review of the medical record reflected R66 was admitted to the facility 1/31/24 with diagnoses that included Left Below the Knee Amputation, Wound Infection, and Morbid Obesity. On 2/27/24 at 11:06 AM, R66 was observed laying in bed on sheets stained with what appeared to be drainage from a dressed wound on the right lower extremity. On the opposite side of the bed the sheet was also stained from drainage that appeared to be from the wound of the left leg stump. The sheet had holes in the upper half of the sheet toward the head of the bed. On 2/28/24 at 12:20 PM, R66 was observed lying in bed on the sheet with holes but the wound drainage stains previously noted covered a greater areas. It was observed that the dressing on the right lower extremity appeared fresh and was dated 2/28/24. Also observed was a wet, brown-tinged, dated dressing was on the floor next to the bed. Just across from this old dressing lay a pile of soiled white towels. No staff were observed in the area. At approximately 12:25 PM on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Annual forms were fully completed for 1 resident (R44) out of 3 residents reviewed for Advance Directives and for their ability to participate in decision making. Findings: R44 Review of R44's admission Record dated 2/28/24 revealed the residents was re-admitted to the facility on was 5/27/23 and had diagnosis that included: Cerebral infarction, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, contracture of left shoulder and Left hand, Anxiety, Bipolar and PTSD. Further review of the admission Record reflects the R44's sister is DPOA/HC Surrogate/Proxy, Emergency 1st Contact AR Representative 1. Review of Advance Directives in R44's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Annual Review of Determination of Inability to participate in Complex Decision Making reflected R44 was evaluated/observed by an MD on 5/1/23 and was deemed is/is not (circle one) (not was circled) able to make medical treatment and/or financial decisions and is/is not (circle one) (not was circled)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report timely an allegation of abuse for one Resident (Resident#180). Findings: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #180 (R180) admitted to the facility 2/15/24 with diagnoses that include Parkinson's Disease and Depression. The MDS Section GG reflects that Mobility for toilet transfers that R180 is Dependent -Helper does ALL of the effort . review of the Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) reflected a score of 13 out of 15 which indicated the Resident is cognitively intact. On 2/26/24 at 11:29 AM during an interview in her room, R180 reported that on her second night at the facility she had initiated a call light request for assistance to the bathroom. R180 reported at that time she required two staff for assistance but only one staff member had responded. R180 reported that she was assisted to the bathroom without incident. The Resident reported on return to the bed the staff member pretty much picked me up and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolated
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain basic personal hygiene for one Resident (Resident #66). Findings: Review of the medical record reflected Resident #66 (R66) was admitted to the facility 1/31/24 with diagnoses that included Left Blow the Knee Amputation, Wound Infection, and Morbid Obesity. Section GG for Self-Care line E Shower/bathe self reflected R66 was Dependent. On 2/27/24 at 11:06 AM, R66 was observed in his bed wearing a soiled T-shirt with holes in the chest area of the shirt. R66 appeared to be unshaven, hair disheveled, and presented in a general unkempt state. It was observed that the bed sheet had holes in the upper half toward the head of the bed. Near the foot of the bed the sheet had stains from the drainage around the wound vac on the stump of the left amputated leg. A dressing was also in place on the right lower leg with spots of drainage in this area also. Review of the [NAME], a summary of care needs of a resident, reflected that R66 is to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement positioning supportive care for 1 (Resident #48) of 3 residents reviewed for position and mobility. Findings include: Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #48 (R48) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one sided weakness). Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R48 has one sided weakness on the upper extremity and no impairment on lower extremity. During an observation on 2/26/24 at 10:52 AM, R48 is sitting up in her wheelchair talking on the phone with her left arm loosely laying across a stuffed animal that is in her lap and not supported. During an observation on 2/27/24 at 9:00 AM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) had R48 sitting on the bed ready to be transferred via sit to stand while waiting for another CNA for assistance. R48 did not have her left upper or lower extremity supported for the transfer. In an interview on 2/27/24 at 9:33 AM, R48…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed follow physician orders to provide the necessary respiratory care and services for 1 residents (R21) of 3 residents reviewed for utilizing the use of oxygen equipment. Findings: Review of the Policy/Procedure - Infection Prevention and Control Section Resident Care for Oxygen Use was revised on 9/24/18. Policy States It is the policy of this facility to promote resident safety in administering oxygen. Procedure reflects, The following procedures will be observed in oxygen administration. 1.The Oxygen tubing is to be replaced every (7) days. Oxygen or nasal prongs are to be replaced every (7) days. 2. The tubing should be kept off the floor. 3. The O2 equipment should be cleaned regularly. Resident #21 Review of R21's admission Record, reflects he was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and most recently admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Chronic kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess, monitor, and provide pain management for 1 (Resident #39), resulting in not following physician orders and not accurately documenting in the medical record. Findings include: Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #39 (R39) admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of displaced trimalleolar (ankle) fracture, chronic pain, low back pain, and spinal stenosis in the lumbar region. During an observation on 2/26/24 during initial tour at approximately 10:00 AM, the 300-hall medication cart had the computer displaying all residents in the red, indicating their medications were late and not yet given. During an observation and an interview on 2/26/24 at 3:02 PM, R39 was room [ROOM NUMBER] lying in bed and complained of pain right now in her sciatic nerve that is radiating down her right leg. She said she has a crushed vertebra. She complained she is not getting her pain medications on time and is just chasing the pain.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-02-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Doctor Ordered medications were obtained from the Pharmacy and available to be administered to one Resident (Resident #27). Findings: On 2/27/24 at 7:32 AM, during the Medication Administration Task, an observation and interview were conducted on the 400 hall with Registered Nurse (RN) D. When medications were prepared for Resident #27 (R27), RN D reported the Latanoprost 0.005 ophthalmic eye drops were not available for R27. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Physicians Orders for R27 reflected a current order for Latanoprost Ophthalmic Solution 0.005% Instill 1 drop in right eye one time a day for glaucoma. Review of the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for February 2024 for R27 reflected that on 2/27/24 the administration of the Latanoprost eye drops were initialed by RN D with the Chart Code of 9. The key to the MAR Chart Codes reflected 9 means See Nurses Notes. Review of the EMR Progress Notes (also accepted in the industry as Nurses Notes) for R27 did not reveal an entry on 2/27/24 by RN D…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-29 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to safeguard the confidentiality of medical records for 2 of 79 facility residents (R36 and R69), resulting in the potential for unauthorized access to the medical records, and the potential for the loss of resident privacy and confidentiality of their personal health information. Findings include: During an observation on 02/28/24 from 8:35 AM to 8:40 AM, the computer screen, located on the 400 Hall Medication Cart was left unattended and open to R36's electronic medication administration record (e-MAR). R36's name, date of birth , room number, physician's name, allergies, special instructions for medication administration, code status, recent vital signs, and medication were visible to anyone walking by. No staff were within view of the medication cart during this time. Another resident (R18) was sitting in a wheelchair at an angle to the medication cart and the computer screen was potentially visible to him (the Surveyor could read the computer screen standing directly behind R18). During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-18 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to treat one Resident (R10) with dignity and respect. Findings include: Resident#10 (R10) On 8/16/23 at 8:34 AM, during the initial tour, an alarm was heard coming from the 200 Hall area. An alarm on the tube feed pump was going off. The bottle of tube feed was empty. Initial observation of R10 from the hallway, revealed he was wearing a brief. The resident's brief was partially covered by his sheet with the rest exposed to those in the hall. R10 was observed (from the hallway) for over 10 minutes prior to staff assistance. On 8/16/23 at approximately 8:48 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C entered resident's room and stated, (Name of R10's) tube feed started last night, he's empty and needs a new bottle. On 8/16/23 at 8:59 AM, LPN C stated (while providing care) the family does not like clothes on the resident from June on because he is so hot and contracted and clothing makes him uncomfortable. LPN C reflected she was going to care plan…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0635 — isolated
    Provide doctor's orders for the resident's immediate care at the time the resident was admitted.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility to ensure physician orders for immediate and necessary care and services on admission for one Resident (Resident#10), resulting in a delay of resident centered appropriate care. Findings include: Resident#10 (R10) On 8/16/23 at 8:34 AM, during the initial tour, an alarm was heard coming from the 200 Hall area. Further observation revealed the alarm on a tube feed pump for R10 was going off. The bottle of tube feed was empty. On 8/16/23 at approximately 8:48 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C entered resident's room and stated, (Name of R10's) tube feed started last night; he's empty and needs a new bottle. Review of the empty bottle of tube feeds label indicated the Name of the Brand and 1.0 Cal and the bottle had contained approximately 1000 ML of content. The writing on the label contained Residents Name and Room Number, 8/15/23 date, start time of 1 PM, with a rate of 80 ML/HR until 1920 ML infused. The bottle contained approximately 1000 ML.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor urinary catheters for one resident (Resident #10) resulting in cross contamination, with the potential of infection. Findings include. Resident #10 (R10): On 8/16/23, at 8:34 AM, R10 was observed lying in bed and the resident's purple dignity bag (goes around his urine collection bag) was found on the floor about 2 feet from the foot of the bed. The catheter collection bag and tubing were found on the floor beneath the bed. On 8/16/23 at approximately 11:00 AM, a record review of R10's admission Record revealed resident was admitted on [DATE]. The record failed to provide insight on the residents' diagnosis and advance directive information. Review of Resident #10's electronic medical record reflected; the admissions packet had not been completed. Further review of resident's electronic medical record reflected, no base line care plan, or [NAME] (a system of communication and organization used to document resident care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-08-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI000135323 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medication in accordance with Doctors Orders for one resident (Resident #13) resulting in repeated excessive dosing of a medication and the potential for all facility residents to not receive medication in accordance with the Doctor's Orders. Resident #13 (R13): Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected that R13 admitted to the facility 7/15/23 with Medically Complex Conditions that included Sepsis and Hemiplegia (weakness to one side of the body). Review of the Doctors Orders (DO) for R13 reflected an order for a Gabapentin 100 milligram (mg) capsule to be administered in the morning and for a Gabapentin 300 mg capsule to be administered at bedtime. Review of the 200-hall medication cart locked narcotic box did not reveal any Gabapentin 100 mg capsules but only Gabapentin 300 mg capsules for R13. Review of the 200-hall controlled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · B2024-02-29 · tag F0582 — pattern
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to give the appropriate notice of termination of Medicare Part A coverage to the resident/responsible party for 3 of 3 residents (R10, R49, and R285) reviewed and potentially affecting an additional 16 of 79 current facility residents who were given notice of termination of Medicare Part A coverage in the last six months. Findings include: R10 A review of R10's admission Record, dated [DATE], revealed R10 was an [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R10's admission Record revealed multiple diagnoses that included multiple sclerosis. R10's admission Record also revealed R10 was their own responsible party. A review of R10's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs), dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15 which revealed R10 was cognitively intact. A review of R10's SNF (Skilled Nursing Facility)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2026-04-04 for 63 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Greenfield Rehab and Nursing CenterRoyal Oak, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Kent-CrossingGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Bloomfield HillBloomfield Hills, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of WyomingWyoming, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grand RapidsGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of KingsfordKingsford, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Three RiversThree Rivers, MI 1 of 5Pickaway Manor Care CenterCircleville, OH 1 of 5The Lakeland CenterSouthfield, MI 1 of 5West Park Care Center LLCColumbus, OH 2 of 5Monterey Care CenterGrove City, OH 2 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of MuskegonMuskegon, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation at St. FrancisSaginaw, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of CantonCanton, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn HeigDearborn Heights, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of TroyTroy, MI 2 of 5Woodward Hills Health and Rehabilitation CenterBloomfield Hills, MI 3 of 5Belle Fountain Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterRiverview, MI 3 of 5Canal Winchester Care CenterCanal Winchester, OH 3 of 5Evergreen Health and Rehabilitation CenterSouthfield, MI 3 of 5Four Seasons Nursing Center of WestlandWestland, MI 3 of 5Grand TheDublin, OH 3 of 5Mill Run Care CenterHilliard, OH 3 of 5New Albany Care CenterColumbus, OH 3 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at LeonardGrand Rapids, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of IoniaIonia, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen ParkAllen Park, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Ann ArborAnn Arbor, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Sterling HeigSterling Heights, MI 3 of 5RiverviewColumbus, OH 3 of 5ShorePointe Nursing CenterSt. Clair Shores, MI 4 of 5Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation CenterLivonia, MI 4 of 5Shelby Health and Rehabilitation CenterShelby Township, MI 5 of 5Abbyshire Place Health And Rehabilitation Center LBidwell, OH 5 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grosse PointeGrosse Pointe Woods, MI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OM HOLDCO 7 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2025
PATEL, RAJANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2025
OPTUM MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS. INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
COOPER, LINDSAYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2025
SHARON, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2025
SOLAREWICZ, KRYSTYNAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
VAGNETTI, KIMIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
916 E LEWIS ST PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
SCHLAUPITZ MADHAVANOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
CONNER, MARIANNEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 15 rows in the source record cover these 11 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

5 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$8.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-37.9%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$950K
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 69%Medicare 7%Other / private 24%

This home reported $950K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$401per resident / day
operating cost
$12,192per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$291per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235206. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-05, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next