Abbyshire Place Health And Rehabilitation Center L

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

36.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 37 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.30 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 47% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 95 beds and averages 74.8 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 20 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.55 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.75 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.26 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.68 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.90 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 24% is below the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2024-07-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of the facility's fall investigation, review of a self-reporting incident (SRI) and for an allegation of neglect and the facility's related investigation, observation, staff interview, family interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with cognitive impairment, who was at risk for falls and had a history of falls, received the appropriate level of supervision to prevent him from falling in the facility's enclosed patio area. This affected one (Resident #65) of three residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of Resident #65's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included a history of a pubis (pelvic) fracture (05/2024), heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), osteoarthritis (OA), orthostatic hypotension, muscle weakness, vertigo, atrial fibrillation, unspecified dementia, and macular degeneration. He resided on the facility's North unit until he was moved to the secured memory…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-02-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain proper hand hygiene during tray line. This had the potential to affect all 90 residents in the building. Findings included: Observation of lunch tray line on 02/07/24 which began at 10:55 A.M. revealed the following: At 11:03 A.M., Dietary Aide (DA) #104 touched her face three times and did not wash her hands. DA #104 then began touching trays and drinks. At 11:15 A.M., DA #104 touched her ear, then placed her hands on her hips. DA #104 did not wash her hands prior to touching trays. At 11:23 A.M., DA #104 touched her upper lip and did not wash her hands prior to touching trays. At 11:27 A.M., DA #104 touched her face twice and did not wash her hands prior to touching trays. At 11:34 A.M., Dietician #128 coughed into her arm, did not wash her hands or change gloves, then continued to help serving lunch. Interview on 02/07/24 at 11:45 A.M. with DM #132 confirmed all findings. Review of a policy titled IC- Hand Hygiene/Hand Washing (dated 03/18/13) revealed it is the policy of the center to provide guidelines to staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2024-02-12 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a clean, homelike environment related to walls in disrepair and a dirty bathroom. This affected five residents (#5, #11, #52, #57, and #72) who resided in rooms [ROOM NUMBER]. The facility census was 90. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #72 revealed an admission date of 04/12/23 with pertinent diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis, contracture right and left hip, protein calorie malnutrition, polyneuropathy, epilepsy, hypertension, depression, hyperlipidemia, gastrostomy status, cerebral infarction, pain, and vascular dementia, Record review of Resident #57 revealed an admission date of 06/27/23 with pertinent diagnoses of: obstructive and reflux uropathy, chronic kidney disease stage three, chronic pain syndrome, benign prostatic hyperplasia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and retention of urine. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] on 02/12/24 at 10:10 A.M. revealed there was multiple large deep scratches…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a facility self-reporting incident (SRI) report for misappropriation of property, review of the facility's related investigation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to provide a prompt effort to resolve a grievance/ concern from a resident regarding missing personal property. This affected one resident (#58) of one resident reviewed for missing personal property. Findings include: A review of SRI with tracking #241366 dated 11/20/23 revealed the facility self-reported an allegation of misappropriation involving Resident #58 as the resident victim. Another resident was identified as the alleged perpetrator. The date and time of the occurrence was on 11/20/23 at 3:00 P.M. and the alleged incident occurred in the resident's room. Resident #58 provided meaningful information as part of the facility's investigation. The summary of the incident revealed Resident #58 reported his wallet was missing and it had $600.00 dollars and a bank card in…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
  Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's medication was not misappropriated and was administered to the resident it was intended for. This affected one resident (#61) of two residents reviewed for misappropriation of property. Findings include: On 02/08/24 at 9:25 A.M., an observation of the medication administration cart for the VA/ North hall revealed there was an Insulin Lispro (fast acting insulin given as an injection subcutaneously) Kwik Pen u-100 that was found in the top drawer of the medication administration cart. It had a pharmacy label wrapped around the Kwik Pen with a resident's name that had been marked out using a black Sharpie. The last name of the resident, whom the Kwik Pen was intended for, was still visible and identified the resident by name. There was also another resident's name (first name) that had been hand written on the side of the Kwik Pen using a black Sharpie. Findings were verified by Registered Nurse (RN) #103. The facility's Director of Nursing (DON) had walked out of her office and into…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on review of a facility self-reporting incident (SRI) report for misappropriation of property, review of the facility's related investigation, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's allegation of misappropriation was thoroughly investigated and included interviews with all relevant employees that may have had knowledge of the alleged misappropriation. This affected one resident (#58) of two residents that were reviewed for misappropriation of property. Findings include: A review of a SRI report with tracking #241366 dated 11/20/23 revealed the facility self-reported an allegation of misappropriation identifying Resident #58 as the resident victim and another resident (Resident #47) as the alleged perpetrator. No witnesses were identified in the report. The date and time of the occurrence was on 11/20/23 at 3:00 P.M. and the alleged incident occurred in the resident's room. Resident #58 was indicated to have been able to provide…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
  Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to accurately complete a level one Pre-admission Screening/Resident Review (PASRR) and did not list post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) on the serious mental illness section to be reviewed for a level two. This affected one resident (#82) of two residents reviewed for PASRRs. The facility census was 90. Findings include: Record review revealed Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with behaviors, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, PTSD, major depression, and anxiety disorder. Review of a PASRR completed on 01/15/24 by Admissions Director (AD) #143 revealed PTSD was not indicated under the level one review for serious mental illness. Interview on 02/07/24 at 4:53 P.M. with AD #143 confirmed PTSD was not included on the level one screen for the PASRR. Review of a policy titled Pre-admission Screening dated 05/13/20 revealed it is the responsibility of the center admissions personnel or designee to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure residents had a comprehensive care plan in place to address Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) and impaired vision. This affected two residents (#25 and #82) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #25's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included adult onset diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and history of a cerebral vascular accident (stroke). A review of Resident #25's admission nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident was known to have impaired vision. There was no mention of him having the use of any glasses to address his impaired vision. A review of Resident #25's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had adequate vision with the use of corrective lenses. He was not indicated to have any communication issues and was cognitively intact. A review of Resident…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
  Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure care plans were revised to reflect a resident's non-compliance with the use of hand splints to manage contractures and another resident's care plan was revised to reflect the use of a leg bag collection system with the use of his indwelling urinary catheter. This affected two residents (#72 and #73) of 20 residents reviewed for care plans. Findings include: 1. A review of Resident #72's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following a cerebral vascular accident (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side, lack of physical exercise, contractures of the bilateral hips and the bilateral knees, muscle spasms, vascular dementia, and unspecified osteoarthritis. A review of Resident #72's physician's orders revealed the resident had the use of a palm guard to his left hand at all times to promote skin integrity. The order was in place between 05/24/23…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-02-12 · tag F0699 — isolated
  Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, and interview, the facility failed to provide services to prevent Resident #82 from experiencing triggers related to post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This affected one resident (#82) of two residents reviewed for behaviors. The facility census was 90. Finding included: Record review revealed Resident #82 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including dementia with other behaviors, cognitive communication deficit, dysphagia, post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), major depression, hypertension, and anxiety disorder. Review of an admission minimum data set completed on 01/20/24 revealed Resident #82 had a diagnosis of PTSD, exhibited physical behaviors towards others four to six days a week, verbal behaviors towards others four to six days a week, wandered one to three days a week, and had other behaviors one to three days a week. Review of orders revealed Resident #82 had orders in place for mirtazepine 15 milligrams (mg) at bedtime for depression, trileptal (an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $416K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH