Four Seasons Nursing Center of Westland
8365 Newburgh Road, Westland, MI 48185 · For profit - Corporation · 180 certified beds · (734) 416-2000 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- lower-than-typical staff turnover (32% vs 45% nationally) — better care continuity
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (46) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $15,593 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-09)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.8% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 8.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.4% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 1.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 2.4% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.7% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 7.5% | 12.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 23.2% | 19.4% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 100.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 12.8% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 12.4% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.0% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.1% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.7% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.7% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.09 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.81 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
45.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 140 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 80.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 47 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.26 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 38% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 13% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 45.7%CMS range 35.8–55.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.5%CMS range 7.4–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 80.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 78.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 48.9% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 1.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.3–11.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.77 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 180 beds and averages 151.0 residents a day — about 84% occupied, or roughly 29 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.40 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.60 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.85 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.97 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.57 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.68 to 0.41 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 32% is below the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
46 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number MI00149416. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address a change in condition in a timely manner for one (R801) of two residents reviewed for changes in condition, resulting in the resident being transferred to the hospital where they were found to have a blood sugar of 1200 (normal range 60-120 mg/dl - milligrams per deciliter), fever, and difficulty breathing requiring mechanical ventilation. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) revealed an allegation that R801's family member noticed R801 had swelling in his arms, legs and belly starting around 12/11/24. It was brought to the nurse's attention that R801 was sleeping more and wouldn't wake up fully .was slow to wake and it was not normal . It was documented R801's condition was more noticeable a week prior to resident being sent out to hospital on 1/3/25. The complaint alleged that nobody did anything about R801's change in condition until 1/3/25 when a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-09 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide activities of daily living care in a safe manner, for one resident (R701), resulting in a fall from bed with injury of a fractured vertebrae. Findings include: This citation pertains to Intake MI00139950. A review of the Intake noted, Allegations: Details: It was alleged the resident fell off the bed while receiving care and sustained a fractured vertebrae. On 10/9/23 at 2:45 PM, R701 was observed at the nurses station, sitting in a wheelchair, with a neck brace on. A review of R701's progress notes revealed, 9/17/2023 21:08 Nursing - Progress Note Text: resident fall out of bed when CNA (certified nursing assistant) was changing [R701] onto floor, small skin tear on head, vital signs stable called DON (Director of Nursing), applied ice pack to head. On 10/09/23 at 1:22 PM, the Unit Manager was asked if R701 pushed away from the care provider during care, and explained, yes CNA A did turn away from R701. The Unit Manager further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-07-01 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 3018809.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify the correct resident for an Intravenous (IV) placement for one resident (R703) out of six reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:A review of a complaint called into the State Agency noted the following, [R703] was given an IV that was meant for another patient. It is unknown what was in the IV. It is unknown if the IV caused any interactions with [R703]. Nothing is documented about the IV.A review of the medical record revealed R703 was admitted into the facility on 4/29/2026 with the following medical diagnoses, heart disease with Heart Failure and Weakness. Further review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 3/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R703 also required staff assistance for bed mobility and transfers.Review of a progress note dated 5/2/2026 noted the following, After the IV line was inserted, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-09 · tag F0645 — widespreadPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to timely complete annual PASARR (Pre-admission Screening and Annual Resident Review - Level I) assessments and review to the appropriate State - appointed authority for six residents (Resident #5, #6, #11, #14, #59 and #117) of six reviewed for PASARR Level I assessments. The Pre-admission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASARR) in Michigan is a two-step screening and evaluation process. The purpose of the PASARR process is to encourage community care by supporting the placement of individuals with Mental Illness (MI) or those with Intellectual/Developmental Disabilities (ID/DD) in a nursing facility only when their medical needs clearly indicates that the resident requires the level of care provided by a nursing facility. Resident #5On 4/07/26 the medical record for R5 was reviewed and revealed the following: R5 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: Schizoaffective Disorder, Depressive Disorder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-09 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — patternProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply orthotic equipment (hand splints, knee braces, heel lift boots, and elbow extensions) for four residents (R9, R22, R48, and R144) out of four reviewed for limited range of motion. Findings include:R9A review of the medical record revealed R9 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses, Muscle Weakness and Peripheral Vascular Disease. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0/15 indicating impaired cognition. R9 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the medical record revealed the following on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for April 2026, Orthosis/Splint to be applied to Left RHS (Resting Hand Splint) and Rt. (Right) elbow splint 4 hrs (hours) check skin integrity pre and post application of splint/braces every day shift for contracture prevention. Start date:…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent and provide risk versus benefits of psychotropic medication use for one severely cognitively impaired resident (R109) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: On 4/7/26 at 9:10 AM, R109 was observed sitting in the dining room eyes closed, drifting in and out of sleep. Attempts to speak with the resident were to no avail due to their cognition. A review of R109's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 6/5/25 with diagnoses which included Alzheimer's Disease, Depression and Anxiety. Further review revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required assistance with Activities of Daily Living. In addition, the resident had a medical power of attorney dated 4/18/16 in place granting their son as the representative. Review of the resident's active physician's orders revealed the resident was prescribed the following psychotropic medications:Seroquel (anti-psychotic) Oral Tablet 25 MG (milligrams), ordered, 2/25/26.Buspirone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-09 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake number 2980818.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's (R82) right to be free from physical abuse by another resident (R45) out of five reviewed for abuse. Findings include:A review of an Incident and Accident (I/A) report dated 4/6/2026 noted the following, Nurse was called to the front lobby to remove the resident (R45). Front desk coordinator stated that The resident (R45) began hitting and grabbing onto another resident (R82) from a different unit. This all occurred in the lobby and was witnessed.Further review of a progress note in R82's medical record dated 4/6/2026 noted the following, At 18:58 (6:58pm) resident was hit in the head by another resident, writer assessed resident, skin and pain assessment complete, 1/10 pain, BP( Blood Pressure) 126/64, RR (Respiration Rate) 17 P (Pulse) 90, unit manager A, NP (Nurse Practitioner [Name]), administrator and family notifiedA review of the medical record revealed R82…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to timely coordinate with the appropriate State-appointed authority to complete a PASARR (Preadmission Screening and Resident Review) Level II Comprehensive Evaluation (used to determine the appropriate setting for the individual and recommends what, if any, specialized services and/or rehabilitative services the individual needs) for one resident (R38) of five residents reviewed for PASARR Level II recommendations. Findings include: A review of R38's medical record revealed they were initially admitted into the facility on 9/23/19 with diagnoses of Depression, Anxiety, and Psychotic Disorder. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the resident's medical record revealed a Comprehensive Level II Evaluation dated 7/7/2022 which was noted as being the Annual Resident Review which Require Re-Evaluation in 363 days. On 4/9/26 at 12:59 PM, a request for R38's Level II evaluation was made to the facility, and surveyor was provided with a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolatedProvide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the timely appointment of a guardian for one resident (R99) out of one resident reviewed for medically related social services. Findings include:A review of the medical record revealed R99 admitted into the facility on 7/19/2024 with diagnoses of depression, Parkinson's Disease, and anxiety disorder. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set assessment (MDS) for R99 dated 1/26/2026 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15, indicating impaired cognition.Further review of the medical record of R99 revealed a physician's note dated 8/16/2024 indicating that R99 is not capable of making their own medical decisions, as well as a petition for guardianship form that was submitted by the facility dated 4/7/2025.On 04/09/2026 at 9:30 AM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Social Work DSW. The DSW stated that R99 was their own responsible party on admission but was found to be incapacitated (unable to make their own medical decisions) and needed to have a guardian appointed. The DSW…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-09 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clean privacy curtains for two residents (R13 and R64) of three reviewed for homelike environment. Findings include:R13 On 4/7/26 at 9:00 AM, an observation was made of R13's privacy curtain being soiled with a dried brownish substance on the bottom of the curtain. On 4/9/26 at 10:54 AM, R13's privacy curtain was observed to continue to be soiled. R13 was asked about the curtain and stated, I think it's dried blood. It's not good. On 4/9/26 at 11:15 AM, Floor Services Staff (FSS) I was observed removing R13's privacy curtain and indicated to the surveyor that it would be cleaned. FCS I was asked if there was a cleaning schedule for residents' privacy curtains. FSS I indicated that staff made referrals if they noticed a dirty privacy curtain and they were changed per request. A review of R13's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R13 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Bi-polar disorder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: 274990Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's privacy for four residents (R904, R905, R906, and R907) of four residents reviewed for resident rights. Findings include: A review of documentation submitted to the State Agency (SA) revealed the following, On 2/12/26 at approximately 8:30pm Administrator was notified by Corporate Compliance Officer that a call had come in that employee [Licensed Practical Nurse, LPN B] posted a [Social Media] Story Clip of resident [R904] in the [NAME] Day room at approximately 7:50pm . On 3/4/26 at 12:53 PM, an attempt to contact LPN B via phone was to no avail.A review of the facility's interview of LPN B revealed she recorded a fall as part of the facility fall investigation process using her personal phone. She explained she thought she deleted the video prior to leaving the facility and was notified by a previous facility employee that she had posted the video to her social media…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: 2789064Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to administer medications properly to one resident (R901) of one reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:A review of information submitted to the State Agency (SA) revealed the following, .[R901's] sister was in facility visiting and was laying in the patient's bed .The nurse came in and administered the patient's medications to the family member .911 had to be called and the family member had to be transported to the hospital .A review of R901's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 2/16/26 with diagnoses which included Diabetes, Other Cirrhosis of the Liver, and Heart Failure. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required assistance with activities of daily living.On 3/4/26, a request for documentation including transfers to the hospital was requested from the facility. A document was provided indicating the following, On 2/24/26 at approximately 0930 (9:30am), the sister of resident [R901] was present in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake 2569649.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident's right (R703) out of one reviewed to be free from mental abuse and verbal abuse by staff.An allegation of staff to resident abuse involving Staff F and R703 was submitted to the state agency around 7/9/25.On 7/30/25 at 9:45 AM, R703 was observed sitting up in their wheelchair in their room. When the resident was asked about the incident involving Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F on 7/9/25, they said the nursing assistant came in that morning to empty my catheter bag. I told them to be sure it was closed because it has been leaking. The nursing assistant got smart with me and said she knew how to do her job. So, I called her a B and spelled it out to her. We argued. The nursing assistant then proceeded to pull my covers off me and throw them on the floor and threw water at me. I was trying to use my call light to call for help, but she pulled it away from me and put it…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake 1246198Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply compression stockings for one resident (R700) out of two reviewed for following physician orders. Findings include:A review of Intake called into the State Agency noted R700's legs are swollen and painful.On 7/30/2025 at 9:48 AM, R700 was observed lying in bed. R700 was observed to have heel boots on and nothing else. R700 reported they are supposed to have compression stockings on to help with the swelling in their legs, but the facility staff have only been put them on once or twiceA review of the medical record revealed R700 was admitted into the facility on 3/20/2024 with the following medical diagnoses, Muscle Weakness and Disorder of Muscle. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R700 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers.A review of active physician orders revealed the following, please apply (name of compression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-30 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake 2564064Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent the development of an unstageable pressure ulcer (Full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) for one resident (R702) out of one reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include:A review of Intake called into the State Agency noted R702 admitted into the facility with their skin intact and developed an unstageable pressure ulcer on their coccyx/buttocks while in the facility due to not being turned and repositioned, as well as delayed incontinence care.A review of the medical record revealed R702 was admitted into the facility on 5/7/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Muscle Weakness and Lymphedema. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 indicating an intact cognition. R702 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers.Further review of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-11 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI0015340. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate documentation of administration and accountability of controlled substances for one (R903) of four residents reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: Review of a complaint filed with the State Agency included allegations that R903 was admitted for a five-day hospice respite stay and did not receive their medications either at all, or as prescribed, including controlled substances (liquid morphine-for pain and lorazepam-antianxiety). Review of the clinical record revealed R903 was admitted into the facility on 5/27/25 and discharged on 6/1/25. Diagnoses included: encounter for palliative care, multiple sclerosis, pseudobulbar affect, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, other seizures, stiff-man syndrome, and diplopia. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, there was only an entry assessment documented and a discharge return not anticipated assessment with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper storage and discarding of medications in one of eight medication carts affecting three residents (R906, R907 and R908) of three residents reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On 6/11/25 at 10:28 AM, upon walking onto the Spring Unit, an unlocked medication cart was observed with no licensed staff present. Additionally, the monitor on the top of the cart was left open with personal information in view to anyone that walked by for R907. The medication cart had an insulin pen (Lantus Solostar for R907) stored directly on top of the cart. Upon opening the unlocked top drawer of the medication cart, there were several clear medicine cups with pills in each cup. One of the cups contained five pills (later identified by Registered Nurse, RN 'E', as medication for R906); one cup had a white pill and another cup contained a white pill. At 10:30 AM, RN 'E' was observed exiting a seperate resident's room. When asked about the unlocked cart, open monitor and insulin stored on top of the cart,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00153683 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide nail care to one (R703) of five residents observed for nail care. Findings include: R703 was admitted on [DATE] with the following relevant diagnoses: Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction (Stroke); Functional Quadriplegia, Anxiety. R703 required substantial staff assistance for all activities of daily living (ADL's) and mobility. On 5/29/2025 at 1:35 PM, an observation of R703's fingernails revealed the nails were very long, about ¾ of an inch beyond the end of the finger and contained debris, some was yellow and some darker in color. On inquiry, R703 revealed they wanted them trimmed and had some anxiety about having them cut, afraid the skin may get nipped. During an interview with Registered Nurse (RN) Dat 2:45 PM, they confirmed the resident's should get regular nail care. An interview with Assistant Director of Nurse (ADON) revealed regular nail care should be carried out as part of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-29 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00153683 Based on observation, interview and record review facility failed to answer call light in a timely manner for one (R703) of five residents reviewed for timely call lights. Findings include: R703 was admitted on [DATE] with the following relevant diagnoses: Sequelae of Cerebral Infarction (Stroke); Functional Quadriplegia, Anxiety. R703 required substantial assistance for all activities of daily living (ADLs) and mobility. On 5/29/2025 at 1:35 PM, R703 was observed lying in bed. On inquiry R703 reported after activating the call light, it often takes a very long time saying, if I put it on to much they (facility staff) don't like it. On 5/29/25 at 1:51 PM, Registered Nurse (RN) D came in the room making rounds. R703 indicated they needed a brief change and their feet hurt due to being against the footboard. RN D replied they would notify R703's Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) they needed assistance. ON 5/29/25 at 2:06 PM, CNA B entered the room, turned the call light…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-02-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — widespreadEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure pureed food items were of the proper consistency. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 9 residents receiving a pureed diet texture. Findings include: 02/10/25 at 12:15 PM, the lunch tray-line service was observed in the main kitchen. A pan of pureed carrots was observed on the steam table. The mixture was observed with visible small chunks of orange carrot bits, mixed in with a pale orange viscous substance. On 02/10/25 at 12:25 PM, a puree test tray was obtained. A taste test of the pureed carrots revealed small chunks of carrots, that required chewing before swallowing. On 02/10/25 at 12:30 PM, Dietician M and Chef L were shown the pureed carrots and asked if the texture looked acceptable for a pureed diet. Both stated the pureed vegetable was not the proper consistency, and that the vegetable would be pulled from the steam table and re-made. According to an IDDSI (International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative) chart posted in the facility kitchen, for a pureed diet, the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide timely repositioning for four dependent residents (R34, R44, R97, R118) of five reviewed for positioning. Findings include: Resident #34 On 02/10/25 at 9:38 AM, 12:29 PM, 1:54 PM, and 2:35 PM, R34 was observed to be on their backside in a specialty bed with the head of the bed elevated around 30-45 degrees and a foam wedge was on the mattress at the foot of bed. On 02/11/25 at 8:10 AM, 8:35 AM, 9:30 AM, and 11:41 AM, R34 was observed to be on their backside in bed and a foam wedge was on the mattress at the foot of bed. The head of the bed was up around twenty or thirty degrees. On 02/11/25 at 12:09 AM, 12:39 PM, and 12:43 PM, R34 was observed to be in bed dressed in a hospital style gown, turned toward the door. A foam wedge was visible behind the torso on the left side. At 12:51 PM, 2:02 PM, and 2:59 PM, the head of the bed was around 45 degrees and the wedge was behind the torso at the left side. R34 leaned over to the right edge…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer the correct tube feeding formula for one resident (R119) of four reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: On 2/10/25 at 9:46 AM, R119 was observed lying in bed. A bottle of Jevity 1.5 tube feeding dated 2/9/25 was observed to be hanging on a pole in their room. On 2/11/25 at 9:19 AM, two bottles of Jevity 1.5 tube feeding, one of which was dated 2/10/25 and the other dated 2/9/25 was observed in the trash can next to R119's bed. A review of R119's record revealed they were admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis: Benign Neoplasm of Meninges (brain tumor) and Dysphagia, oropharyngeal (inability to swallow). Further record review revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 11 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. A review of R119's physician orders revealed the following: active order dated 1/29/25 Enteral feed two times a day Nutren 2.0 @88ml/hr (milliliters per hour) x 12 hours…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-12 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication error rate was less than five percent resulting in two medications errors in 32 opportunities for a 6.25% medication error rate. Findings include: On 02/11/25 at 9:03 AM, a medication pass observation was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) F for R108. The Lanthanum Carbonate, 1000 mg (milligram) supplement was not available to be given. RN F attempted to pull two calcium carbonate 500 mg tablets and was then asked to review the order. The Lanthanum carbonate was not given. A review of the January 2025 and February 2025 Medication administration record and electronic medical record medication progress notes documented the medication was not given and or not available. The February 2025 MAR documented the medication had been given 19 times. A pharmacy receipt request for the Lanthanum Carbonate was requested and a response via email dated 03/12/25 at 2:14 PM by the Director of Nursing revealed, Discussed again with dialysis regarding this medication - Order was active, but labs drawn on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were dated when opened in two of five medications carts and two of two medication rooms reviewed. Findings include: On 02/12/25 at 8:43 AM, the Spring unit front cart was reviewed with Regeistered Nurse (RN) H revealed an Arnuity inhaler was not labeled with a resident identifier and not dated when opened on the inhaler nor the box. On 02/12/25 at 9:01 AM, the Spring unit back cart was reviewed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J a lispro insulin was not dated when opened and was without a resident identifier. On 02/12/25 at 11:12 AM, the Winter medication storage room was reviewed with LPN K, one tuberculin derivative vial was not dated when opened on the vial nor the box. On 02/12/25 at 11:51 AM, the Summer medication storage room was reviewed with LPN J, one tuberculin derivative vial was not dated when opened on the vial. On 02/12/25 at 11:14 AM, the Director of Nursing (DON) reported the tuberculin vials should be dated when opened. A review of the manufacturer's insert for the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices by removing used urinals from overbed tables for three residents (R26, R122, 135) out of three residents reviewed for infection control practices. Findings Include: R26 On 02/10/25 at 9:15 AM, R26 was observed laying in bed watching television and a urinal half filled with yellowish urine sitting on over bed table. The resident was preparing for breakfast. A review of R26's medical record revealed R26 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of atheroscloratic heart disease, muscle weakness, and atrial fibrillation. A review of R26's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview of Mental status (BIMS) assessment of 15/15 indicating resident is cognitively intact. R22 On 02/10/25 at 9:20 AM, R122 was observed laying in bed watching television with a urinal noted quarter filled with yellowish urine sitting on the over bed table. R122 had recently had breakfast and tray was being…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolatedMake sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for two (R42, R24) of two dependent residents. Findings include: R42 On 02/12/25 at 9:13 AM, R42 was observed to be in a recliner at the nurse's station outside the door to the dining room. At 10:19 AM, R42 was observed to have been returned to bed and changed into a hospital style gown. The call light was tucked under the left edge of pillow for their head. R42 was asked if they could reach the call light. R42 attempted to reach the light with their right hand but was not able to reach the call light. R42 was not able to move their left arm to reach the light. R42 reported it had been affected by a stroke. A review of the record for R42 revealed R42 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Stroke and Heart Disease. The care plan initiated 06/18/20 documented an alteration in mobility related to limited range of motion to the left shoulder. The care plan did not provide an intervention…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00147682. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a comprehensive nursing assessment was completed and timely acute care emergent hospital transfer for one Resident (R702) of three residents reviewed for care, when R702 sustained a fall with head trauma and bleeding while taking anticoagulant medication. Findings include: Review of R702's Accident and Incident report, dated 8/19/24 at 3:00 (a.m.), revealed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) H was notified by staff that R702 was observed sitting on floor in their room and hit the back of their head on the wall near their bed, sustaining a head laceration. R702 stated they were trying to get up and clean and slipped and fell. The report showed LPN H assessed R 702 for pain and injuries, found R702 had 8/10 pain, and applied a cold compress to back of their head to stop the bleeding. On 11/13/24 at approximately 12:00 p.m., R702 was observed with LPN B in their room. R702's room was clean,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intakes MI00147560 and MI00147466. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent resident to resident abuse, between two residents (R700 and R701) out of three reviewed for abuse. Findings Include: A review of an Incident and Accident (I/A) report for R700 dated 10/10/2024 at 5:19 AM revealed the following, Nursing Description: CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) reported that resident was wet, and the resident stated that R701 poured water on [them]. Writer asked R701 did [they] pour water on R701, [they] stated, I've been asking (R700) for months to shut the f* up. Resident Description: Resident stated, R701 poured water on me repeatedly and stated,what are you going to do about this. A review of the medical record revealed R700 admitted into the facility on 8/16/2024 with the following diagnoses, Functional Quadriplegia, Depression, and Anxiety. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 13/15 indicating an intact cognition. R700 also required staff assistance…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00147570. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a nutritional care plan intervention for one resident (R702) out of one reviewed for nutrition. Findings Include: On 10/23/2024 at 12:48 PM, R702 was observed eating lunch in their room. R702 stated they were making a mess and said they had a method for how to eat their food, which included trying to scoop the food together and take a bite. R702 was observed to have food on their (bib like) towel and the bedside table. Observation of the diet ticket on R702's meal tray stated they were supposed to have a divided plate. R702's food was observed to be on a regular plate. On 10/23/2024 at 12:50 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) E was observed removing R702's meal tray. CNA E was asked to observe the meal ticket, as well as the plate R702 was eating off. CNA E stated R702 should have a divided plate, and they were unsure why they did not have one. A review of the medical record revealed R702 admitted into the facility on 7/23/2024 with the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolatedProvide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00147570. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide and/or document colostomy care for one resident (R702) out of one reviewed for ostomy care. Findings Include: A review of Intake MI00147570 noted the following, Complainant states that there has been skin breakdown around R702's ostomy because they sit in their own waste for extended periods of time. A review of the medical record revealed that R702 admitted into the facility on 7/23/2024 with the following diagnoses, Dysphagia and Multiple Sclerosis. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. On 10/23/2024 at 9:33 AM, an interview was conducted with R702. R702 stated the facility staff do not empty their colostomy as often as they should. R702 stated because the colostomy is not emptied as it should be then it fills and burst and has to be changed frequently. A review of the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for the month of September revealed the following,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake M100144631. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement measures to reduce the risk of a fall with injury for one (R701) of five residents reviewed for falls. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R701 revealed an admission date of 05/03/24 and indicated the resident was admitted for short-term rehab following a trigger finger repair surgery. The record indicated the resident was expected to be discharged to an assisted living facility. On 05/29/24 at 9:48 AM, R701 was interviewed in their room and reported they did recall their recent fall. The resident was observed to have a dressing on the right forearm and bruising under their eyes and on their forehead. R701 reported they were transferring from the wheelchair to the bed and they were being assisted by Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A. The resident indicated CNA A was holding their pants and when they stood and began to pivot to the bed they fell forward and landed on the floor. When asked if the CNA was wearing a gait belt R701 stated No,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-03-13 · tag F0807 — failed to offer suitable drinks — patternEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides drinks consistent with resident needs and preferences and sufficient to maintain resident hydration.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake MI00142546 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to pass and /or date water for five of five residents (R804, R805, R806, R807, and R808) reviewed for hydration. Findings Include: R804 On 3/13/2024 at 11:16 AM, R804 was observed laying in bed. Their water cup was beside them on the nightstand. The water was observed to be dated 3/8/2024. On 3/13/2024 at 11:25 AM, an interview was conducted with Registered Nurse (RN) B. RN B was shown the water cup. RN B stated that the water should be passed at the beginning of the shift and as needed. RN B removed the water from the room. R805 On 3/13/2024 at 12:00 PM, R805's water cup was observed dated 3/9/2024. The water cup was observed sitting in a corner. R806 On 3/13/2024 at 12:01 PM, R806's water cup was not dated. The water cup was half full without any ice. R807 On 3/13/2024 at 12:01 PM, R806's water cup was not dated. The water cup was full. R808 On 3/13/2024 at 12:01 PM, R806's water cup was not dated. The water cup was full. On 3/13/2024 at 1:14 PM, an interview was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-13 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143053. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan related to falls and an indwelling catheter upon admission for one resident (R803) of one reviewed for baseline care plans. Findings include: On 3/13/2024 at 9:13 AM, an interview was conducted with Family Member (FM) E. FM E stated that R803 had a fall in the facility that resulted in a broken hip and their foley catheter becoming dislodged. FM E stated that R803 was not admitted into the facility correctly and was not being properly monitored. A review of the medical record revealed that R803 admitted into the facility on 2/10/2024 with the following diagnoses, Difficulty in Walking and Neuromuscular Dysfunction of Bladder. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12/15 indicating an impaired cognition. A review of the nursing assessment dated [DATE] revealed that R803 admitted with an indwelling catheter and was also a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-12-06 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient practice statement #1. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen resulting in an increased potential for cross contamination of food and foodborne illness, potentially affecting 144 residents who receive meal services (7 nothing by mouth residents, or NPO) out of the facility's total census of 151 residents. Findings include: 1. On 12/5/23 between 9:45 AM, and 10:47 AM, the following non-food contact surfaces in the kitchen were observed soiled and with visible debris on their surfaces: On the doors of the cook's reach in refrigerator. On the flooring in the dry storage room. On the walls and flooring behind the juice machine. On the floor of the walk-in cooler and its shelving. On the lower interior portion of refrigerator #1. On the flooring throughout the kitchen. On 12/5/23 at 10:50 AM, upon interview with Dietary Manager, staff A, on if the facility keeps daily cleaning logs for tasks to be completed to which they replied, Yes. We have sign off sheets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to midigate the spread of COVID-19 per facility policy, and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) guidance resulting in the potential of transmission of infectious disease, and the development of new or recurring infections potentially affecting all 151 residents residing in the facility. Findings include: R92 On 12/4/23 at 10:21 AM, during an initial tour of the facility a transmission based precautions (TBP) sign was observed on the door of R92's room. The sign indicated that any person entering the room should don (put on) proper personal protection equipment (PPE) which included gown, gloves, N95 mask (Filtering mask), and face shield. Observation and inspection of the infection control cart located next to R92's room revealed an absence of sanitary bleach wipes, N95 masks, and gloves. On 12/4/23 at 10:24 AM, R92 was interviewed in their room and asked why they were on TBP. R92 responded, I tested positive for COVID-19 on Sunday…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dignity during care for one (R27) of eight residents reviewed for resident rights and dignity. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R27 revealed an admission date of 02/04/19 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Psychotic Disorder with Delusions and Anxiety Disorder. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated that the resident required primarily total assistance with activities of daily living and demonstrated severe cognitive impairment. On 12/05/23 at 3:39 PM, R27 was observed laying in bed. There was no pillow case on the pillow or laying nearby and therefore the resident's head/face was resting on the plastic pillow covering. The surveyor attempted to interview the resident regarding the sling and they were responsive but not able to communicate functionally during this interaction. On 12/06/23 at 9:13 AM, R27 was observed from the hallway receiving completion of peri-care and having their…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to revise and implement an intervention on the care plan for one resident (R137) from a sample of 10 residents reviewed for care plans following a fall. Findings include: A review of R137's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia, Encounter for attention to tracheostomy, Diabetes and Anxiety. Further review revealed a quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] indicating that the resident was cognitively intact and required total dependence for all Activities of Daily Living. A review of R137's Incident and Accident reports revealed that on 11/20/23, the resident sustained a fall. A review of R137's progress notes revealed the following progress note: 11/30/202310:05 (10:05am) Case Mgnt (management) Note Text: Reviewed by IDT (interdisciplinary team) r/t (related to) recent unintentional change in elevation. The root cause was identified as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00136173, MI00138504, and MI00138662. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide activities of daily living care (ADLs) for two dependent residents (R9 and R77) of nine residents reviewed for ADL care, resulting in feelings of frustration. Findings include: R9 On 12/4/23 at 10:52 AM, during an initial tour of the facility R9 was interviewed and asked about the care they received at the facility. R9 indicated that they did not receive enough showers. R9 stated, I don't receive showers on my scheduled shower days. On 12/5/23 at 12:02 PM, a thirty day review of R9's shower documentation in their electronic medical record (EMR) revealed that R9's scheduled shower days were Fridays and Tuesdays, and that R9's documented showers during the thirty day review period revealed that R9 had been offered showers on 11/7/23, 11/24/23, and 11/29/23 indicated, Activity did not occur. No other shower documentation was indicated for R9. On 12/5/23 at 12:47…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements: Deficient Practice Statement #1. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow speech recommendations for one residemt (R77) out of two reviewed for speech. Findings include: On 12/6/2023 on 9:20 AM, R77 was observed in their room. R77 was observed laying in bed with the bed of their raised up. R77 was noted to have a breakfast tray in front of them and with a coffe cup, a straw was noted to be in the cup. A sign was observed on the wall that noted R77 was not supposed to have straws. A review of the medical record revealed that R77 admitted into the facility on 9/7/2022 with the following diagnoses, Dementia, Aphasia, and Cerebral Infarction. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 1/15 indicating an impaired cognition. R77 also required extensive one to two person assist with transfers and bed mobility. On 12/5/2023 at 9:30 AM, a review of R77's diet order revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply knee braces for one resident (R133) out of two reviewed for range of motion. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed that R133 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Legal Blindness and Muscle Weakness. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 5/15 indicating an moderatly impaired cognition. R133 was also dependent on staff for bed mobility and transfers. A review of the physician orders revealed the following, Frequency: Every Shift. Schedule Type: Everyday. Facility Time Code: 12 Hour Evry Shift. For (Indications for Use): Bilateral Knee Splints to prevent contractures. On 12/4/2023 at 12:25 PM, R133 was observd in bed. No knee braces were seen in place. On 12/5/2023 at 9:00 AM, R133 was observed in bed. No Knee braces were observed in place. On 12/5/2023 at 12:23 PM, R133 was observed in a geriatric chair. No Knee braces were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-06 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain medications in a safe manner for one sampled resident (R254) of one reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On 12/4/23 at 9:04 AM, R254 was observed sitting up in bed eating breakfast. A medication cup full of medications were observed sitting on their overbed table. R254 was asked about the medications, and stated that they would take the medications after they finished their breakfast. R254 was asked how many medications they had to take, and was observed to count the medications indicating that there were eight medications, including a large potassium pill that needed to be melted. On 12/4/23 at 9:55 AM, R254 was observed to still have the medication cup sitting on their overbed table with one pill remaining in the cup. A review of R254's medical record revealed that the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Acute Kidney Failure, Muscle Weakness, and Hyperlipidemia. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-06 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolatedEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00138504 and MI00138662 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served in a palatable manner and at the preferred temperature for two residents (R9 and R116) of four residents reviewed for food palatability, resulting in dissatisfaction during meals. Findings include: On 12/4/23 at 10:47 AM, during an initial tour of the facility R9 was interviewed about the palatability of the food at the facility and indicated that their food was, Frequently cold. On 12/4/23 at 1:24 PM, R116 was interviewed about the palatability of the food at the facility and indicated that the food didn't taste good and was cold. An observation of R116's lunch meal revealed that R116 had eaten their hamburger patty, their hamburger bun and french fries were uneaten on their plate. R116 was asked about the uneaten food on their plate and stated, The french fries are cold and hard as a rock. On 12/5/23 at 12:32 PM, a random food tray selected off of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-15 · tag F0776 — isolatedProvide timely, approved x-ray services, or have an agreement with an approved provider to obtain them.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains in part to Intake: MI00137574. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely x-ray services after a fall with injury for one sampled resident (R901) of two residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a delay in treatment. Findings include: A review of R901's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 5/2/23 with diagnoses that included Acute Kidney Failure, Muscle Weakness, and a Urinary Tract Infection. Further review of R901's medical record revealed an admission Minimum Data Set assessment dated for 5/8/23 revealing that the resident was significantly cognitively impaired, and required extensive assistance for transfers, bed mobility, and toilet use. Further review of R901's medical record revealed the following progress notes: 5/27/2023 15:06 (3:06pm) Nursing - Progress Note: Resident attempting to ambulate self to bathroom. [R901] fell on rt (right) hip and knee. [R901] is c/o (complaining of) pain at knee cap area. No bruising observed, no abnormal anatomy. Ice applied and resident given Tylenol for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number: MI00137967. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (R801 and R802) of two residents reviewed for abuse who were known to be attracted to one another but were not cognitively able to consent to sexual activity, did not engage in sexual activity. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, updated on [DATE], revealed, in part, the following: Residents have the right to be free from abuse .Prevention consists of facility systems designed to detect, identify, correct, and prevent the occurrence of abuse .The facility's procedures include: Establishing a safe environment that support, to the extent possible, a resident's consensual sexual relationship and by establishing policies and protocols for preventing sexual abuse, such as how to identify the when, how, and by whom determinations of capacity to consent to a sexual contact will be made and where this documentation will be recorded; and the resident's right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number: MI00137967 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of sexual activity between two (R801 and R802) of two residents reviewed for abuse who were not cognitively able to consent to sexual activity, to the State Agency. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, updated on 5/24/23, revealed, in part, the following: .Sexual Abuse .Non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident including but not limited to unwanted touch especially breasts or perineal area .The facility will ensure that all allegations involving abuse .are reported immediately to the Administrator and: Reported to the State Survey Agency immediately but not later than two hours after the allegation is made if the allegation involves abuse . Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that R801 was found outside on the patio with R802 engaging in sexual activity. The complaint further alleged that R801 was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-03 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number: MI00137967 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly and accurately investigate an allegation of sexual activity between two (R801 and R802) of two residents reviewed for abuse who were not cognitively able to consent to sexual activity, to the State Agency, resulting in the lack of development of new interventions to prevent future occurrences of sexual activity between the two residents. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Abuse, updated on 5/24/23, revealed, in part, the following: .Sexual Abuse .Non-consensual sexual contact of any type with a resident including but not limited to unwanted touch especially breasts or perineal area .Key to investigating abuse allegations is an environment that facilitates that reporting of such allegations. Once reported, the center conducts a timely, thorough, and objective investigation of any allegation of abuse .The investigation process includes: .Determining the purpose of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$15,593 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $15,593 — penalty dated 2023-10-09
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DUNN, CHARLES | Individual | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 02/01/2000 |
| OPTUM MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS. INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2000 |
| COLVIN, WILLIAM | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| PATEL, RAJAN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 02/01/2000 |
| SHAH, SARJU | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SHARON, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2024 |
| WHEELER, CHRISTINE | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| SHAH, HEMANT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/27/2025 |
| CHARLES WESTLAND LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/01/2000 |
| CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SCHLAUPITZ MADHAVAN | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CONNER, MARIANNE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 18 rows in the source record cover these 12 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
4 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 15% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235578. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-04-09, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.