Canal Winchester Care Center
6800 Gender Road, Canal Winchester, OH 43110 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 124 certified beds · (614) 834-6800 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (54) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $26,685 in federal fines (most recent 2025-04-02)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 4.1% | 5.3% | 15.4% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 7.2% | 6.2% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.6% | 0.4% | 2.0% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 58.3% | 30.1% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.5% | 3.2% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 5.7% | 6.1% | 16.1% | typical for the state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 15.1% | 25.5% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.5% | 94.5% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 3.7% | 3.4% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 31.0% | 21.4% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 4.6% | 8.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.9% | 1.2% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 96.0% | 75.6% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 30.5% | 24.9% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 9.3% | 12.9% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.21 | 1.73 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.86 | 1.80 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 137 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 83.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 62 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.39 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 68% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 54.5%CMS range 46.5–62.9 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.3%CMS range 6.8–12.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 83.9% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 80.7% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.7% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 97.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 98.4% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.3% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 9.5%CMS range 5.9–13.3 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.08 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 124 beds and averages 111.1 residents a day — about 90% occupied, or roughly 13 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.53 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.49 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.89 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.31 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.62 on weekdays — 9% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.51 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 44% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
54 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY THE FOLLOWING DEFICIENCY REPRESENTS AN INCIDENT OF PAST NONCOMPLIANCE THAT WAS SUBSEQUENTLY CORRECTED PRIOR TO THIS SURVEY. Based on observation, record review, review of hospital records, facility policy review and interview, the facility failed to ensure fall risk/safety interventions were in place to prevent falls for one resident (#103) with known history of falls from bed. Actual harm occurred on 04/20/25 when Resident #103 who had a severe cognitive impairment and required extensive assistance from two staff for bed mobility sustained a fall out of bed resulting in hospitalization and surgical repair for a nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture with of left femur when Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #800 left the room with the resident's bed in high position and the fall mat leaned against the wall to retrieve personal care supplies in the facility supply room. This affected one resident (#103) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 108. Findings Include: Review of the medical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review, staff interview, hospice staff interview, review of hospice visits notes and review of facility policy, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive and individualized pressure ulcer prevention program to timely identify, assess and implement treatment for Resident #51 related to a pressure ulcer to the left lateral foot. Actual harm occurred on 08/09/24 when Resident #51, who was cognitively impaired and dependent on staff for activity of daily living care was first identified by the facility to have an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) pressure ulcer to the left lateral foot. Prior to 08/09/24 hospice staff had identified this pressure ulcer, however the facility failed to identify the unstageable pressure ulcer prior to 08/09/24, failed to ensure on-going assessments and monitoring of the ulcer were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-22 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, record review, Food Committee Minute review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure food temperatures were monitored to prevent food borne illness. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 110.Findings include: Review of dietary food temperature logs for March 2026 revealed missing meal temps on 03/18/26 and 03/23/26 for breakfast and lunch; 03/19/26 and 03/31/26 for breakfast, lunch and dinner; 03/12/26 for lunch and dinner; and 03/14/26, 03/15/26, 03/17/26, 03/26/26, 03/27/26, 03/28/26, 03/29/26 and 03/30/26 for dinner.Review of dietary food temperature logs for April 2026 revealed missing meal temps on 04/06/26, 04/08/26, 04/11/26, 04/12/26, 04/15/26, 04/17/26 and 04/18/26 for breakfast and lunch; 04/01/26, 04/03/26, 04/16/26, and 04/19/26 for breakfast, lunch and dinner; 04/02/26, 04/05/26 and 04/09/26 for dinner; and 04/14/26 for lunch.Review of the food committee meeting minutes for March 2026 revealed residents stated fries, baked potatoes and tenders were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors This affected one resident (Resident #111) of three residents reviewed for medications. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #111 revealed an admission date of 04/03/26 and a discharge date of 04/05/26 with diagnoses including secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, aplastic anemia, multiple myeloma not having achieved remission, need for assistance with personal care and adult failure to thrive. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not assessed. The resident was assessed to require supervision or touching for eating, dependent on staff for toileting hygiene, shower/bathing, dressing and bed mobility.Review of the physician's order dated 04/06/26 revealed Resident #111 had an order for Pomalyst (anti-cancer medication) 2 milligrams (mg) by mouth in the morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-22 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on closed record review, interview, and review of facility policy the facility failed to ensure meal intakes were documented for one resident (#111) of three residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 110. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #111 revealed an admission date of 04/03/26 and a discharge date of 04/05/26 with diagnoses including secondary malignant neoplasm of bone, aplastic anemia, multiple myeloma not having achieved remission, need for assistance with personal care, and adult failure to thrive. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was not assessed. The resident was assessed to require supervision or touching for eating.Review of Resident #111's meal intakes from 04/03/26 through 04/05/26 revealed one documented meal for breakfast on 04/05/26. Further review of meal intakes revealed no intakes recorded for breakfast, lunch or dinner on 04/04/26; no documented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-17 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure hairnets were worn properly by kitchen staff to protect food from potential contamination. This had the potential to affect all residents except one (Resident #2) who did not receive food from the kitchen due to an active NPO (nothing by mouth) order. The facility census was 112.Findings include:Observation on 02/10/26 at 7:20 A.M. revealed [NAME] #108 was wearing a hairnet that was not adequately covering their hair, leaving the back of their hair exposed to hang at approximately shoulder level while frying eggs and plating breakfast foods.Interview on 02/10/26 at 7:30 A.M. with Regional Dietitian #477 verified [NAME] #108's hairnet was not fully covering their hair while performing food service tasks. Further interview at this time revealed Regional Dietitian #477 stated the hairnet could be lower to cover the cook's hair.Review of the facility policy titled Hair Restraints approved 09/15/10 revealed hair shall be restrained to prevent physical contamination of food. Further review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to maintain dignity during meal time. This affected one (Resident #28) of seven residents observed in the dining room. The census was 112. Findings include:Review of Resident #28's medical record revealed he was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included dementia, anxiety, and major depression. Review of the quarterly minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed his cognition was severely impaired, he required substantial/maximal assistance for eating, was dependent for oral hygiene, toileting, shower/bathing, dressing and personal hygiene. On 02/11/2026 at 8:40 A.M. observation of the dining room revealed Certified Nurses Aide (CNA) #206 standing and feeding Resident #28. CNA #206 was observed to continue to stand and feed Resident #28 until 8:46 A.M. Interview on 02/11/26 at 8:46 A.M. with the Administrator confirmed CNA #206 was standing feeding Resident #28.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy on bed hold, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of the facility's bed hold policy in writing. This affected one resident (Resident #133) of one resident reviewed for hospitalization. The facility census was 112.Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #133 revealed an admission date of 12/03/25 and a discharge date of 01/12/26. Further review of the medical record revealed Resident #133 had diagnoses that included unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition, Type II Diabetes Mellitus, heart failure, cutaneous abscess of abdominal wall, colostomy status, and depression. Review of the five-day PPS Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #133 had moderate cognitive impairment and demonstrated physical, verbal, and other behavioral symptoms.Review of the progress note dated 01/12/26 at 05:17 P.M. revealed the facility nurse practitioner ordered Resident #133 to be evaluated in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, medical record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to develop a comprehensive, person-centered care plan that included Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) therapy (a device that delivers air pressure using a mask to keep the airway open while sleeping). This affected one (Resident #91) of two residents reviewed for CPAP therapy. The census was 112.Findings include:1. Review of Resident #91's medical record revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acute on chronic combined systolic (congestive) and diastolic (congestive) heart failure, pulmonary hypertension, iron deficiency anemia, chronic venous hypertension with ulcer of bilateral lower extremity, obstructive sleep apnea, restless leg syndrome, anemia, pain, shortness of breath, and localized edema.Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed Resident #91 was cognitively intact and required partial or moderate assistance for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility activity calendar, the facility failed to provide meaningful activities to all residents. This affected two (Residents #44 and #101) of six residents reviewed for activities. The census was 112.Findings Include:1. Resident #44 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, vitamin D deficiency, disorder of muscle, hypertensive heart and chronic kidney disease, end stage renal disease, Type II Diabetes, acute respiratory failure with hypoxia, rhabdomyolysis, hypoosmolality and hyponatremia, acute kidney failure, hypothyroidism, atherosclerotic heart disease, hypotension, muscle weakness, dyspnea, hypertension, insomnia, edema, osteoarthritis, and constipation. Review of her minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 12/12/25, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #44's recreational therapy assessment, dated 11/20/25, revealed her…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and observations this facility failed to ensure post appointment instructions were followed this affected one (Resident #101) of one resident reviewed for follow up care. The facility also failed to ensure Thrombo-Embolism Deterrent (TED) hose were in place as ordered. This affected two (Resident #80 and #91) of the two residents reviewed for TED hose placement. The facility census was 112. Findings include:1. Review of the medical record for Resident #101 revealed an admission date of 03/24/2023 and a re-entry date of 01/28/2025. Diagnosis included chronic obstructive sleep apnea, need for assistance with personal care, and heart failure. Review of Resident #101's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15 out of 15 indicating an intact cognition for daily decision-making abilities. Resident #101 was noted to require set up or clean up assistance for oral hygiene and was noted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation and staff interview, the facility failed to implement and/or follow physician orders to treat pressure injuries. This affected two residents, (Resident #126 and Resident #91), of four residents reviewed for pressure injury management. The facility census was 112. Findings include:1.Record review for Resident #126 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: diabetes mellitus, hemiplegia, hemiparesis, chronic congestive heart failure. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had impaired cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of six. This resident was assessed to require self-care assistance. Resident #126 was coded with a Stage II (partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red or pink wound bed, without slough or bruising. May also present as an intact or open/ruptured blister.)pressure ulcer and a Stage…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 42 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility nutrition policies, the facility failed to ensure one ( Resident #66) did not experience a significant weight loss and failed to ensure one ( Resident #92's) fluid restriction was followed. This affected two of seven residents (#14, #36, #44, #66, #92, #10, and #10) reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 112.Findings include: 1. Review of Resident #66's electronic medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), schizoaffective disorder, anxiety disorder, stage three chronic kidney disease, type two diabetes mellitus, muscle weakness, personal history of neoplasm of the large intestine, and acquired absence of other specified of the digestive tract amongst other diagnoses. Further review of Resident #66's electronic medical record revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of eight (dated 11/08/25), suggesting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician orders for oxygenation therapy for Resident #06 and continuous positive airway pressure, (CPAP) use for Resident #36. This affected two residents, (Residents #06 and #36) of four residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 112.Findings Include:1.Record review for Resident #06 revealed this resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including: cerebral infarction, diabetes mellitus, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, anxiety, depression, congestive heart failure and choric obstructive pulmonary disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed this resident had intact cognition evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15. This resident was assessed to require mobility and self-care assistance. Review of the care plan dated 01/02/26 revealed Resident #06 has altered respiratory status and breathing difficulty.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-02-17 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to timely and thoroughly address all pharmacy recommendations. This affected two (Residents #7 and #3) of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations. The census was 112.Findings Include:1. Resident #7 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses were acute respiratory failure, non-displaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, disorder of muscle, acute pulmonary edema, other acute osteomyelitis, cardiomyopathy, hypokalemia, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease (stage IV), atherosclerotic heart disease, hypo-osmolality and hyponatremia, Type II Diabetes, ischemic cardiomyopathy, anxiety disorder, shortness of breath, depression, obesity, insomnia, muscle weakness, hypertension, edema, and umbilical hernia. Review of his minimum data set (MDS) assessment, dated 01/19/26, revealed he was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #7 pharmacy recommendation, dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure transmission based precautions and personal protective equipment usage were followed as required. This had the potential to affect 21 (Residents #44, #15, #22, #27, #122, #137, #61, #138, #89, #13, #24, #114, #62, #58, #23, #115, #56, #38, #126, #90, and #66) of 112 residents in the facility. Also, the facility failed to use proper hand hygiene after administering medications and performing wound care treatment. This affected two (Residents #73 and #91) of six residents reviewed for infection control practices. The census was 112.Findings Include:1. Observations on 02/09/26 at 7:05 P.M. revealed Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) #116 was in Resident #61's room with a mask around their chin. CNA #116 did not have any other personal protective equipment (PPE) on while in the resident's room. Resident #61's room door was observed and had two signs on her door; one for droplet isolation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-17 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and staff interview, the facility failed maintain a safe environment free of hazardous chemicals for one (Resident #97) of 17 residents on the 300 hall way. The census was 112. Findings include:Review of Resident #97's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included but were not limited to hypertension, hyperlipidemia and atrial fibrillation. Review of the comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #97 was cognitively impaired, used a walker and wheelchair for mobility, and had no behaviors. The facility identified Resident #97 as being cognitively impaired, independent with ambulation and mobility, and residing on the 300 hallway.Observation on 02/11/2026 at 11:03 A.M. of the 300 hallway revealed residents up and about the hallways and a container of microdot minute wipes (clean and disinfectant wipes) on top of both medication carts stored on the 300 hallway.Review of the microdot minute wipe…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident record review, staff interviews, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide care and services to prevent falls. This affected two residents (Resident #15 and Resident #120) out of five residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 100 residents.Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #120 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included pulmonary hypertension, dementia and spondylosis. The resident was discharged home from the facility on 10/10/25. Review of Resident #120's admission assessment on 09/27/25 revealed that she was at risk for falls and she was to have two-person assistance with bed mobility. Review of Resident #120's Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed that Resident #120 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, indicative of intact cognition. She was assessed as needing touch assistance for mobility and transfers. Review of Resident #120's baseline care plan…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to provide timely care for surgical incision staple removal for Resident #103 and Resident #109. The facility also failed to obtain physician ordered daily weights for Resident #83. This affected two residents (#103 and #109) of three residents reviewed for wound/incisional care and one resident (#83) of three residents reviewed for implementation of physician orders. The facility census was 108. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #103 revealed an admission date of 08/15/22 with diagnoses including fractured femur, sick sinus syndrome, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), mood disorder, cerebral infarction with associated hemiplegia and hemiparesis, anxiety disorder, depression, dependence on wheelchair, presence of pace maker, presence of artificial hip joint (left), and presence of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) draining device. Review of progress notes for Resident #103 revealed Resident #103 had surgery…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-11 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, medical record review, skin assessments and interviews, the facility failed to ensure skin breakdown prevention interventions were in place. This affected one resident (#103) of one resident reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 108. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #103 revealed an initial admission date of 08/15/22 with the latest readmission of 04/26/25 with the diagnoses including but not limited to nondisplaced intertrochanteric fracture of left femur, sick sinus syndrome, anemia, mood disorder, contracture of muscle, multiple sites, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, overactive bladder, cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, anxiety disorder, insomnia, depression, adult failure to thrive, osteoarthritis, constipation, personal history of traumatic brain injury and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 12/07/22 revealed the resident was at risk for pressure ulcer formation related to generalized debility and weakness as evidenced by decreased mobility in bed and wheelchair, required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure timely notification to the resident and medical practitioner regarding a change in the resident's condition and need to alter the resident's treatmet plan. This affected one resident (#98) of nine residents reviewed for notification. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #98's medical record revealed an admission date of 12/10/19, a re-entry date of 01/28/25 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, neuropathy, anxiety and major depression. Review of Resident #98's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 15/15 indicating the resident had intact cognition. Review of Resident #98's progress note dated 03/27/25 at 2:43 P.M. revealed the resident was having lower back pain and facility staff notified the nurse practitioner and obtained orders to get an x-ray and to give Tylenol 500 milligrams two tablets three times daily as needed for pain. Review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and medical record review the facility failed to develop a comprehensive resident centered pressure ulcer prevention care plan for one resident (#107) of five reviewed for prevention of alterations in skin integrity. The facility census was 104. Findings include: Review of Resident #107's medical record revealed an admission date of 02/23/25, a discharge date of 03/12/25 and diagnoses including diverticulitis of the intestine with perforation and abscess, influenza, colostomy status, bladder disorder, rheumatoid arthritis, anxiety, unspecified disorder of psychological development and unspecified intellectual disabilities. Review of Resident #107's admission minimum data set (MDS) revealed a brief interview for mental status score of 12 indicating the resident was moderately cognitively impaired. Further review of Resident #107's MDS revealed the resident to be at risk for pressure ulcers, to be receiving a surgical wound care and to be using a pressure reducing mattress. Review of Resident #107's care plan revealed no care plan in place to prevent the development…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to follow proper infection control and isolation precaution procedures. This affected four (Residents #18, #77, #80, and #81) of four residents reviewed for infection control procedures. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: Observations on 02/20/25 from 10:30 to 10:40 A.M. revealed Resident #77 and Resident #80 had personal protective equipment (PPE) carts in front of each of their rooms. But there were no signs outside of their doors indicating if they were actually on isolation precautions or what type of isolation precautions they were on. Interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #103 on 02/20/25 at 10:35 A.M. confirmed Residents #77 and #80 were on contact/droplet isolation precautions for being diagnosed with influenza. The nurse confirmed there should have been signs outside the door, indicating the type of isolation precautions the residents were on as a safety mechanism for staff…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-20 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of the facility self-reported incident (SRI), and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure all residents were treated with dignity and respect. This affected one (Resident #71) of two residents reviewed for dignity. The facility census was 102. Findings Include: Resident #71 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure, acute cystitis, hypothyroidism, type II diabetes, vitamin D deficiency, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, atrial fibrillation, lymphedema, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), insomnia, chronic kidney disease, myopia, mood disorder, hypertension, depression, bipolar disorder, morbid obesity, and dependent on supplemental oxygen. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 01/13/25, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of SRI tracking number 256314, dated 01/21/25, revealed Resident #71 reported that Certified Nursing Aide (CNA) #110 made an inappropriate comment to her while…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and interviews, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31's call light was answered in a timely manner. This affected one resident (#31) of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an initial admission date of [DATE] with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, herpes viral infection urogenital system, restless leg syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, neuropathy, hypothyroidism, peripheral vascular disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, spondylolisthesis of cervical region, osteoarthritis, scoliosis, generalized muscle weakness, edema, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, hypertension, seasonal allergic rhinitis, pruritus, and nicotine dependence. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations of photographs, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin for one resident (#51) with facial bruising who was dependent on staff to the required state agency. This affected one (Resident #51) of one resident reviewed for injury of unknown origin. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an initial admission date of 03/12/20 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, stage IV pressure ulcer left ankle, Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder, neuropathy, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, atrial fibrillation, overactive bladder, aphonia, dry eye syndrome, hyperlipidemia, constipation, pain, bladder-neck obstruction, chronic sinusitis, ataxic gait, asthma, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, insomnia, repeated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observations of photographs, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely investigate an injury of unknown origin for one resident (#51) with facial bruising who was dependent on staff. This affected one (Resident #51) of one resident reviewed for injury of unknown origin. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #51 revealed an initial admission date of 03/12/20 with the diagnoses including but not limited to cerebrovascular accident with left sided hemiplegia, severe protein calorie malnutrition, stage IV pressure ulcer left ankle, Parkinson's disease, major depressive disorder, neuropathy, anxiety disorder, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, atrial fibrillation, overactive bladder, aphonia, dry eye syndrome, hyperlipidemia, constipation, pain, bladder-neck obstruction, chronic sinusitis, ataxic gait, asthma, benign prostatic hyperplasia with lower urinary tract symptoms, insomnia, repeated falls,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure fall interventions were in place for one resident (#43) with a known fall history. This affected one (Resident #43) of three residents reviewed for falls. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #43 revealed an initial admission date of 05/06/19 with the diagnoses including aphasia, history of falls, chronic kidney disease, dysphagia, constipation, dry eye syndrome, pain, atrial fibrillation, hyperlipidemia, non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage, dementia, major depressive disorder, hypertension, aphasia, generalized muscle weakness, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, gastrointestinal hemorrhage, retention of urine and age related nuclear cataract. Review of the plan of care dated 08/23/22 revealed the resident was at risk for falls and had potential for injury related to deconditioning, incontinence, unaware of safety needs, vision/hearing problems, history of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure Resident #31's oxygen nasal cannula was stored in a sanitary manner. This affected one resident (#31) of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an initial admission date of 08/27/14 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, herpes viral infection urogenital system, restless leg syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, neuropathy, hypothyroidism, peripheral vascular disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, spondylolisthesis of cervical region, osteoarthritis, scoliosis, generalized muscle weakness, edema, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, hypertension, seasonal allergic rhinitis, pruritus, and nicotine dependence. Review of the plan of care dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed to ensure timely availability of medication for administration for one resident (#31). This affected one (Resident #31) of three resident received for new medication. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an initial admission date of 08/27/14 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, herpes viral infection urogenital system, restless leg syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, neuropathy, hypothyroidism, peripheral vascular disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, spondylolisthesis of cervical region, osteoarthritis, scoliosis, generalized muscle weakness, edema, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, hypertension, seasonal allergic rhinitis, pruritus, and nicotine dependence. Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews, the facility failed to timely obtain a physician ordered laboratory test for one resident (#31). This affected one (Resident #31) of three reviewed for a change in condition. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an initial admission date of 08/27/14 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, herpes viral infection urogenital system, restless leg syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, neuropathy, hypothyroidism, peripheral vascular disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, spondylolisthesis of cervical region, osteoarthritis, scoliosis, generalized muscle weakness, edema, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, hypertension, seasonal allergic rhinitis, pruritus, and nicotine dependence. Review of the resident's comprehensive Minimum Data…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-10 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, interviews and review of photographs, the facility failed to maintain resident equipment in good repair or a clean and sanitary manner. This affected one resident (#31) of three sampled residents. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: Review of the medical record for Resident #31 revealed an initial admission date of 08/27/14 with the diagnoses including but not limited to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, herpes viral infection urogenital system, restless leg syndrome, vitamin D deficiency, neuropathy, hypothyroidism, peripheral vascular disease, acute and chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, chronic peripheral venous insufficiency, spondylolisthesis of cervical region, osteoarthritis, scoliosis, generalized muscle weakness, edema, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, dependence on supplemental oxygen, hypertension, seasonal allergic rhinitis, pruritus, and nicotine dependence. Review of the resident's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-10 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolatedMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean and sanitary environment. This affected one unit (500 unit) of four units. The facility census was 72. Findings Include: On 09/30/24 at 10:00 A.M., observation of Resident #31's carpeting revealed the carpet was stained with black and white spots. Interview with Resident #31 revealed the stains were present on the carpet when she was admitted and had offered to pay to have the carpeting shampooed. On 09/30/24 at 10:20 A.M., observation of room [ROOM NUMBER] (unoccupied) revealed the carpeting was stained black in multiple areas. On 09/30/24 at 10:21 A.M., observation of resident room [ROOM NUMBER] revealed the carpeting was stained black in multiple areas. On 10/03/24 at 10:30 A.M., interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) #155 verified the stained carpeting in rooms 506, 511,and Resident #31's room. This deficiency represents non-compliance investigated under Complaint Number OH00158259, Complaint Number OH00158032 and Complaint…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure staff used appropriate hand hygiene and personal protective equipment (PPE) to prevent the spread of Coronavirus (COVID-19). This had the potential to affect 16 residents (#5, #7, #10, #23, #25, #26, #32, #36, #37, #41, #46, #50, #59, #60, #62 and #77) who resided in the hall where staff delivered meal trays without implementation of appropriate COVID-19 protocols. The facility identified two residents (#3 and #52) as having active COVID-19 infection. The facility census was 79 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #52 revealed an admission date of 03/27/24 with diagnoses including severe persistent asthma, shortness of breath, and COVID-19. Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #52 dated 08/12/24 revealed the resident tested positive for infection with COVID-19 after exposure from an infected family member was reported. The facility implemented…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, resident representative interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure appropriate care and services were provided to residents following accidents with injury. This affected one (Resident #99) of three residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 79 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #99 revealed an admission date of 07/02/24 with diagnoses including diffuse large B-Cell lymphoma, muscle weakness, viral hepatitis B, and atrial fibrillation. Review of the admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #99 dated 07/06/24 revealed the resident had mildly impaired cognition and required partial/moderate assistance with turning from side to side. Review of the nurse progress note for Resident #99 dated 08/03/24 revealed the resident was being changed and assisted with bed mobility and hit her head on the side rail. There was no swelling or redness was noted. The facility did not notify the physician of the incident, nor did they…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-04-18 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on record review, interview, observation and policy review, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a palatable and warm temperature. The deficient practice affected four residents (#9, #10, #29, and #49) and had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the kitchen except two residents (#32 and #34) who were identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of medical record for Resident #9 revealed admission date of 10/21/22 with diagnoses including diverticulosis of large intestine, dysphagia, and irritable bowel syndrome. Interview with Resident #9 on 04/15/24 at 3:13 P.M. revealed the food was served cold, and they have trouble with keeping temperature. 2. Review of medical record for Resident #10 revealed admission date of 04/19/23 with diagnoses including congestive heart failure, type II diabetes, and morbid obesity. Interview with Resident #10 on 04/15/24 at 11:17 A.M. revealed the food was cold and lukewarm. 3. Review of medical record for Resident #29 revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure food was properly date labeled, clean dishware was clean, and food was held at proper hot holding temperatures. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who received meals from the kitchen except two residents (#32 and #34) who were identified by the facility as receiving nothing by mouth (NPO). The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Observation on 04/15/24 at 11:28 A.M. with Dietary Manager #299 revealed three large plastic containers containing iced tea, lemonade, and punch were dated 04/15/24 to 04/25/24. A tub of chocolate pudding was also observed dated 4/13/24 to 5/13/24. Dietary Manager #299 changed the dates on the beverages to 4/15/24 to 4/20/24. Dietary Manager #299 was also observed changing the date on the pudding to an end date of 04/19/24. Interview on 04/15/24 at 11:28 A.M. with Dietary Manager #299 revealed time controlled for safety (TCS) foods are dated for five days at this facility. When questioned on what tells us about how long beverages should be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on medical record review, interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure the primary care physician (PCP) was notified of elevated blood glucose levels outside of the physician ordered parameters. This affected one resident (#16) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an initial admission date of 04/05/22 with the latest readmission of 04/05/24 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, asthma, maple syrup urine disease, dissociative identity disorder, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 08/23/22 revealed Resident #16 was at risk for hypo/hyperglycemia episodes. Interventions included accu-checks as ordered, administer medications as ordered, lab results as ordered with reported to PCP, monitor for signs/symptoms of hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia, monitor for signs/symptoms of infection, and notify physician of abnormal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure nail care was provided for Resident #22 who was dependent on staff. This affected one resident (#22) of three residents reviewed for activities of daily living (ADL). The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #22 revealed an initial admission date of 10/26/23 with diagnoses including cerebral infarction, chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary failure, anemia, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, hypertension, depression, insomnia, allergic rhinitis, constipation, pain, and dysphagia. Review of the plan of care dated 01/26/24 revealed Resident #22 had a self-care performance deficit related to ADL, abilities will fluctuate between therapy staff and nursing staff, confusion, fatigue, impaired balance, limited mobility, limited range of motion, and stroke. Interventions included ADL level varies with task and time of day, may provide more…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and facility policy review, the facility failed to identify an injury to Resident #35's left great toe and toenail. This deficient practice affected one resident (#35) out of two residents reviewed for general skin conditions. The facility census was 80. Findings include: An observation on 04/15/24 at 12:38 P.M. revealed Resident #35's left great left toe covered with a gauze bandage and secured with a piece of tape. There were no initials, date, or time written on the bandage. An observation on 04/16/24 at 2:26 P.M. revealed Licensed Practical Nurse Unit Manager (LPN UM) #205 removing the gauze bandage from Resident #35's left great toe. There was dark red drainage noted to the gauze bandage. Resident #35's left great toenail was observed to be thick and long curving towards the inside of the foot. There was dried dark red drainage observed on the outside edges of the toenail. The toenail was intact with no evidence of being trimmed or filed recently. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure pressure reducing devices were in place for Resident #17. This affected one resident (#17) of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 80. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #17 revealed an initial admission date of 11/01/23 with the latest readmission of 01/28/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to osteomyelitis left ankle and foot, asthma, dementia, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, atrial flutter, anxiety disorder, spinal stenosis, convulsions, hypertension, dry eye syndrome, and gout. Review of the plan of care dated 11/24/23 revealed Resident #17 had actual impairment to skin related to fragile skin, incontinence, dementia, diabetes mellitus, chronic kidney disease, weakness, aging process, decreased mobility, decreased safety awareness, need for assistance, and right lateral malleolus was surgical, but documentation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interviews and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure Residents #16 and #68 individualized fall preventative interventions were in place. This affected two residents (#16 and #68) of five residents reviewed for accidents. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #16 revealed an initial admission date of 04/05/22 with the latest readmission of 04/05/24 with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, dysphagia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes mellitus, asthma, maple syrup urine disease, dissociative identity disorder, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 08/23/22 revealed Resident #16 was at risk for falls and potential for injury related to confusion, conditioning, incontinence, poor communication/comprehension, cognitive impairment, diabetes mellitus, asthma, maple syrup urine disease, weakness, aging process, assistance devices and effects of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and facility policy review, the facility failed to have a physician's order for the use of oxygen for Resident #35. This deficient practice affected one resident (#35) out of two residents reviewed for respiratory care. The facility census was 80. Findings include: An observation on 04/16/24 at 12:43 P.M. revealed Resident #35 receiving oxygen via nasal cannula with tubing attached to an oxygen concentrator located at the bedside. The oxygen concentrator was set at four liters, and the oxygen tubing leading to Resident #35 was dated 04/14/24. Review of Resident #35's medical record revealed Resident #35 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Lewy Bodies disorder, Alzheimer's disease, high blood pressure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Resident #35 had impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for care. Review of Resident #35's signed physician orders for the month of April 2024 revealed Resident #35 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, observation, interview and facility policy review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than five percent. Twenty-nine opportunities for error were observed with three medication errors made resulting in a 10.34 percent error rate. This affected two residents (#17 and #19) of three residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 80. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #19 revealed an initial admission date of 05/16/18 with the latest readmission of 02/02/24 with diagnoses including but not limited to cerebrovascular accident with right sided hemiplegia, dysarthria and anarthria, dysphagia, atrial fibrillation, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, hyperlipidemia, anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder, dementia, hydrocephalus, gastro-esophageal reflux disease, epilepsy, congestive heart failure, and hypokalemia. Review of the plan of care dated 10/12/22 revealed Resident #19 had gastroesophageal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-28 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, record review, resident interview, staff interview, and facility document review, the facility failed to provide drinks and meals to residents in a timely/respectful manner. This affected 10 residents (#8, #13, #14, #15, #16, #35, #37, #39, #48, and #67) of 18 residents in the 300 hallway who receive meals by mouth. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Observations on 06/25/23 from 12:10 P.M. to 12:42 P.M. revealed ten residents (#8, #13, #14, #15, #16, #35, #37, #39, #48, and #67) sitting in the 300-hallway dining room with no drinks available or offered to them. At 12:37 P.M., the food cart for the room trays arrived for the 300 hallway rooms, not the dining room. All 10 residents watched meals and drinks be passed to the residents in the rooms. At 12:42 P.M., a cup of water was offered to Residents #14 and #48 after they requested it; no drinks were offered to the other eight residents. It wasn't until 12:46 P.M. that all other residents were asked if they wanted something to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-28 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — patternEnsure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, facility document review, resident interview, and staff interview, the facility failed to provide meals in a timely manner. This affected 32 residents (#3, #4, #5, #8, #11, #13, #14, #15, #16, #24, #30, #35, #37, #39, #43, #44, #48, #52, #58, #60, #61, #63, #64, #68, #67, #77, #181, #182, #183, #184, #185, and #186) of 32 residents who receive meals from the 100 and 300 hallways in the facility. The census was 79. Findings include: 1. Observations on 06/25/23 from 12:10 P.M. to 12:37 P.M. revealed multiple residents in the 300-dining room and in their rooms of the 300-hallway, waiting for lunch. Meals were delivered to the 300-hallway rooms, starting at 12:37 P.M. and ending at 12:42 P.M. Observations on 06/25/23 from 12:10 P.M. to 1:12 P.M. revealed ten residents in the 300-hallway dining room, waiting for lunch to be served. Lunch was served at 1:12 P.M. Review of facility mealtimes revealed the lunch mealtimes for the 100-hallway hall trays were supposed to be delivered between 11:40 A.M. to 11:45 A.M. Also, the 300-hallway hall trays were supposed to be…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-28 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and review of facility policy revealed the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner, food was labeled and dated, and residents were not served expired food. This affected Resident #27 and had the potential to affect 77 of the 79 residents residing in the facility. The facility identified two residents (#15 and #34) who ate nothing by mouth. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Observation on 06/25/23 at 9:00 A.M. revealed the following verified concerns: a. Observation of the refrigerator revealed a container of sausage patties with a use by date of 06/23/23, a container of brown gravy with a use by date of 06/24/23, and sloppy joes with a use by date of 06/21/23. This was verified by Dining Services Manager #120 at that time. b. Observation of the dry storage room revealed a large container of thickener dated 04/05/22 and a container of rice with no date on it. Observation of the floor in the room revealed multiple unidentifiable spills were observed across the floor and were noted to be thicker closer to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, review of medical records, activities calendar, and policies, the facility failed to thoroughly assess and care plan activities and failed to ensure activities were available to two cognitively impaired residents (#61 and #68) on the weekends. This affected two residents (#61 and #68) of two residents reviewed for activities. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 03/03/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pressure-induced deep tissue damage, chronic kidney disease stage three, anxiety disorder, encephalopathy, dementia, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had severely impaired cognition. Review of the plan of care dated 03/02/23 revealed Resident #61 showed no interest in group activity secondary to general weakness and terminal diagnosis. Interventions included providing reading,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and staff interview, the facility failed the follow physician orders as written. This affected one resident (#12) of 17 resident physician orders reviewed. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record revealed Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, morbid obesity, hyperlipidemia, gout, congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, sleep apnea, adjustment disorder, major depressive disorder, chronic kidney disease (stage III), anemia, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, transient cerebral ischemic attack, restless leg syndrome, sciatica, pain, and unsteadiness on feet. Review of Resident #12's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #12's current physician orders revealed the facility was to check her weight every Monday and Thursday and notify the physician if there was a greater than three-pound change. This order was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review and interview the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation and proper treatment for Resident #73's pressure ulcer and failed to ensure Resident #61's treatments for her pressure ulcer were completed and documented in the medical record. This affected two residents (#61 and #73) of four reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #61 revealed an admission date of 03/03/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pressure-induced deep tissue damage, chronic kidney disease stage three, anxiety disorder, encephalopathy, dementia, and depression. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #61 had severely impaired cognition. She had two unstageable deep tissue injuries (a purple or maroon localized area of discolored intact skin or blood-filled blister due to damage of underlying soft tissue due to pressure and/or shear). Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to complete weight/nutritional monitoring as needed. This affected two residents (#16 and #55) of seven residents reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Resident #16 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her admitting diagnoses were non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in hemisphere, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, mood disorder, peripheral vascular disease, hypertension, seborrheic dermatitis, insomnia, and dysphagia. Review of her Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 05/16/23, revealed she had a significant cognitive impairment. Review of Resident #16 weights, dated 11/01/23 to 06/10/23, revealed the following significant weight changes: 11/01/22 (127.6 pounds) to 12/19/22 (139.4 pounds), which was a 9.2 percent increase. 12/19/22 (139.4 pounds) to 01/17/23 (132.5 pounds), which was a 5 percent decrease. 01/17/23 (132.5 pounds) to 02/13/23…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to provide adequate parameters for physician orders. This affected two residents (#17 and #10) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 79. Findings include: 1. Resident #17 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses were chronic kidney stage IV, type II diabetes, epilepsy, end stage renal disease, nephrotic syndrome, hemiplegia and hemiparesis, anemia, hyperlipidemia, depression, cognitive communication deficit, gout, anemia, insomnia, osteoarthritis, pain, and long-term use of insulin. Review of his Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment, dated 06/13/23, revealed she was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #17's physician orders revealed an order for Oxycodone HCl 5 milligrams (mg) to be given once every six hours as needed for pain. Also, she had an order for Acetaminophen 325 mg, two tabs every six hours as needed for pain. Neither as needed pain medication had…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-28 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolatedEnsure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and medical record review the facility failed to ensure Resident #68 was provided with a mechanical soft diet as ordered. This affected one resident (#68) of 17 on a mechanically altered diet. The facility census was 79. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #68 revealed an admission date of 11/19/22 with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hyperlipidemia, sciatica, dysphagia, cognitive communication deficit, and depression. Review of the comprehensive Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #68 had severely impaired cognition. She was on a mechanically altered diet. Review of the physician order dated 05/12/23 revealed Resident #68 had an order for a mechanical soft textured diet. Observation on 06/25/23 between 12:27 P.M. and 12:41 P.M. revealed Resident #68 was served a meal by State Tested Nursing Aide (STNA) #140. Resident #68 was served a whole piece of Salisbury steak, mashed potatoes, green beans,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-28 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a catheter bag from lying on the floor causing potential infection control issues. This affected one resident (#73) of two residents reviewed for urinary catheters. The facility census was 79. Findings included: Record review revealed Resident #73 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including osteomyelitis, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, constipation, psoriasis, pressure ulcer of sacral region stage II, discitis of lumbar region, retention of urine, anorexia, benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms, insomnia, pain of bilateral hips, personal history of diseases of the skin and subcutaneous tissue, personal history of urinary tract infections, and presence of urogenital implants. Review of Resident #73's care plan dated 05/22/23 revealed Resident #73's catheter bag should be anchored to prevent tugging or tension on the catheter. On 06/26/23 at 9:50 A.M. an observation was made of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$26,685 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $26,685 — penalty dated 2025-04-02
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OM HOLDCO 2 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 06/01/2022 |
| OPTALIS LP INVESTORS 2 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 06/01/2022 |
| SNW LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 30% | since 06/01/2022 |
| CAMPBELL, LASHONDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/28/2026 |
| CHARLES FRANKLIN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| CHARLES WESTLAND LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| FORBRIGHT BANK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 02/16/2026 |
| HEMANT SHAH 2018 IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| OBS OF OH LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/28/2026 |
| PAAR 108 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2017 IRREVOCABLE TRUST F/B/O AARNA R. PATEL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2017 IRREVOCABLE TRUST F/B/O ANSH R. PATEL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2020 IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST UAD 10-6-2020 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| RAJAN G PATEL 2020 IRR FAM TR UAD 12-3-2020 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2022 |
| CANOWITZ, STEPHEN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/28/2026 |
| FOREMAN, CHRISTY | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/27/2026 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $518K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in OH
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Ohio Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 366462. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-17, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.