Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grosse Pointe

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

63.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 202 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 74.7% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 79 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.65 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 90% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 32% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 80 beds and averages 75.5 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.97 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.31 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.06 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.56 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.16 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

19 citations, most serious first. The 10 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Potential for harm · D2025-09-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to intake 2627057 and 2626819.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of employee to resident abuse for one resident (R903) of two residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:A review of intakes 2627057 and 2626819 revealed allegations of employee to resident abuse resulting in injury and hospitalization.On 9/29/25 at 10:06 AM, a phone interview was completed with R903 who explained they were currently hospitalized for a sustaining a concussion from being physically assaulted in the forehead with an unknown object causing bleeding by an unidentified agency staff member. R903 explained they contacted the local police after the incident and was transferred to the hospital on 9/16/25 following the incident.On 9/29/25 at 11:56 AM, an interview was completed with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the allegations of abuse reported by R903. The DON explained there were allegations of employee to resident abuse that allegedly occurred in the early morning hours of 9/16/25 however, after the facility investigated the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2025-07-23 · tag F0887 — pattern
  Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to offer and provide the COVID-19 immunization vaccine and education to 11 (Staff E, Staff F, Staff G, Staff H, Staff I, Staff J, Staff K, Staff L, Staff M, Staff N, and Staff O) of 99 staff members. Findings include:On 7/23/2025 at 10:04 AM, the Infection Control Preventionist (ICP) was asked about the facility's process for offering the COVID-19 vaccine to residents and staff. The ICP explained they still offer the vaccine to residents; however, it is no longer offered to staff.A review of the facility staff vaccine documentation provided by the facility did not reveal that unvaccinated staff were provided education regarding the benefits and potential risks associated with the COVID-19 vaccine, or that staff were offered the COVID-19 vaccine or information on obtaining COVID-19 vaccine. On 7/23/2025 at 1:05 PM, the ICP explained the facility stopped offering vaccines to staff at the beginning of the year (2025) at the facility, and if a staff member would like the vaccine, they are referred to their local pharmacy. The ICP…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-07-23 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Number of residents sampled: FacilityNumber of residents cited: PatternThis citation pertains to intakes 2560380, 2560402, 2560706, and 2560866.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the safety and protection of six of six confidential female residents during a sexual abuse investigation. Findings include: Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency documented, On 07/10/2025, an unknown male patient (R66) talked (name of R45) into giving them oral sex while they were sitting in the wheelchair and (R66) was standing in the hallway. Two unidentified nurses' aides from the facility walked up on the two and reported the incident . On 07/22/25 at 12:16 PM, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) D was interviewed regarding the sexual abuse incident that was reported to the State Agency. R66 was identified as the alleged perpetrator and R45 as the alleged victim. ADON D indicated upon staff observation of the incident taking place, R66 was initially returned to their room after being separated from R45. ADON D said…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-23 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Intake:1217345 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document and properly administer insulin for one resident (R105) of four reviewed for medication administration. Findings include:A review of a complaint received from the State Agency revealed concerns that the resident's diabetes was not managed appropriately while admitted in the facility. A review of R105's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 6/14/25 with diagnoses that included Critical Illness Myopathy, and Diabetes Mellitus, Type II with Hyperglycemia. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact and needed supervision to limited assistance for Activities of Daily Living. Further review of the medical record revealed the following order placed on 6/14/25, Insulin Lispro 100 UNIT/ML (milliliters) Solution Inject as per sliding scale: if 151 - 200 = 2 units Give 2 units; 201 - 250 = 4 units. Give 4 unit; 251 - 300 = 6 units Give 6 units; 301 - 350 = 8 units Give 8 units; 351 - 400 = 10 units Give 10 units, subcutaneously before meals…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2024-07-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen for 74 residents. Findings include: On 07/16/24 at 8:40 AM and on 07/18/24 at 7:54 AM, the main kitchen was observed with the Dietary Manager (DM) present and the following was noted: -two gnats were flying around the beverage dispenser; -a six inch puddle of water was observed between the coffle dispenser and the reach-in refrigerator; -a fly was flying around the dishwasher area; -food particles were under the garbage disposal-with a bucket under the disposal and on the floor at the left corner of the pre-rinse counter; -a tan colored sludge extended four (six inch) tiles out and 12 tiles down toward the dishwasher; -the dishwasher had a build up of food and sticky soil under the entire foot print of the unit; -the floor under the drying/clean side of the dishwasher had standing water which covered four tiles; -a test of a sanitizer bucket with the DM indicated it was light and not at the proper level for disinfection; -food debris was left on the 8 quart pot and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
  Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely notification of a change in condition for one (R65) of six residents reviewed. Findings include: Review of the facility record for R65 revealed an admission date of 05/20/24 with diagnoses that included Anemia, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, and Acute Kidney Failure. A progress note dated 05/25/24 and timestamped 3:01 AM indicated R65 was found to be primarily unresponsive and had a blood pressure of 90/58. The progress note indicated the physician, (facility)management, and the family were notified and the resident was sent to the hospital. Further review of the record revealed R65 returned from the hospital on [DATE] at 11:00 AM after being treated in the emergency room for hypoglycemia. Review of R65's vital sign history indicated on 05/26/24 at 10:14 AM, the blood pressure reading was 84/58. There was no indication in the record this blood pressure was reported to the physician or that a follow-up blood pressure or action otherwise was…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-18 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dependent residents were repositioned or provided range of motion exercises for three residents (R35, R44, R116) of three whose positioning was reviewed. Findings include: R35 On 07/16/24 at 9:39 AM and 11:43 AM, 1:47 PM, 1:53 PM and 2:52 PM, R35 was observed to be supine in bed with the head of the the bed up around 20-30 degrees. R35 leaned toward the left side of the bed with their head at the left edge of the pillow. The legs/and or foot of the bed was elevated and R35 appeared to have heel boots on. A powered low air loss mattress unit was active at the foot of the bed. The TV was on. At 1:53 PM, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) F was asked about R35 and reported R35 needed assistance with repositioning had a wound to the heel and may have had a small open area on the tailbone or buttocks. R35 appeared asleep at times but did awaken to their name and the knock on the door. At 5:06 PM, R35 appeared supine in bed with no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene during/after resident care for two residents (R26 and R44) and failed to sanitize patient care equipment after use for one resident (R218) of three residents reviewed for hand hygiene during care. Findings include: On 07/17/24 at 8:03 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) J completed a medication administration and washed their hands to a count of five seconds. On 07/17/24 at 8:38 AM, LPN K completed a medication pass and did not complete hand hygiene after removal of their gloves. On 07/17/24 at 08:30 AM, Nurse D did not perform hand hygiene prior to beginning medication preparation. After Nurse D prepared some medications, it was determined stock medications were not available in the medication cart. Nurse D went to the medication storage room to obtain them. Hand hygiene did not occur before Nurse D left the medication cart. Nurse D did not perform hand hygiene when resuming medication preparation. On 07/17/24 at 08:30 AM, Nurse D obtained R218's blood pressure, administered R218's…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-07-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
  Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  This citation pertains to Intake MI00145395. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain clean, sanitary tube feeding equipment for one (R48) of two residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: The facility record for R48 revealed an admission date of 10/20/23 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction and Gastrostomy Status. On 07/16/24 at 10:48 AM, R48 was observed in bed. The tube feeding pole and base were observed to be significantly soiled with tube feeding fluid. On 07/17/24 at 09:06 AM, R48 was observed laying in bed. The tube feeding was being administered. The tube feeding pole and base were observed to continue to be soiled as during the previous observation. On 07/17/24 at 02:42 PM, R48's tube feeding pole was observed to continue to be in the same soiled condition as during the previous observations. On 07/18/24 at 09:07 AM, R48's tube feeding pole and base were observed to continue to be in a significantly soiled condition as during the previous observations. On 07/18/24 at 11:12 AM, the facility Director of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143863. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pressure ulcer treatments were consistently provided as ordered for one (R501) out of three residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: A review of the Intake allegation noted, It was alleged facility staff failed to provide adequate and appropriate care to prevent and/or treat pressure sores. A review of R501's medical record revealed, R501 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE], discharged [DATE], with diagnosis of Type II Diabetes and Protein calorie malnutrition. Further review of R501's medical record noted, Skin assessment dated , 3/13/24 Pressure ulcer acquired New, Unstageable Left ischial tuberosity. 12.5 area, 4.3 length, 4.0cm width . Notes Resident alert with arousal, oriented x1-2, and cooperative to care. Resident exhibiting s/s (signs and symptoms) of decline, refusing food, sleeping through treatment and ADL care. Unable to hold…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 15 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $853K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI