No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Kent-Crossing

2320 E Beltline SE, Grand Rapids, MI 49546 · For profit - Corporation · 182 certified beds · (616) 949-3000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (616) 949-3000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citations on record (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026Resident-funds citation (F0567)1 actual-harm citation1 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
Worth asking about
  • it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Mar 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0567)
  • it has 1 actual-harm citation
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (69) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its payroll- and facility-reported staffing and quality-measure scores sit well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 3 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's staffing and quality-measure ratings run 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself, and staffing on its payroll (PBJ) submissions — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
3330 Claystone St SE · (616) 949-7460 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
2500 E Beltline Ave SE · (616) 949-4499 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
3684 28th St SE · (616) 977-1819 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
3501 Lake Eastbrook Blvd SE · (616) 942-4090

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased8.2%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight4.5%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder1.0%0.8%0.9%worse
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.6%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.5%4.3%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.5%3.0%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened9.5%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication11.3%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine99.2%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.7%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control19.5%20.0%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table12.0%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.1%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine79.2%79.5%79.4%typical
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.831.841.67typical
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.421.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 61 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

54.6%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
10.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.25U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.09hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 34% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 8% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF54.6%CMS range 43.1–66.151.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF10.0%CMS range 6.9–15.510.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identifiednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF staynot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsenednot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 4.4–12.87.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.871.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.64
RN hours/ resident / day
0.83
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.28
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.45
RN hoursweekends
56.1%
Total nursing turnover
84.2%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 182 beds and averages 121.4 residents a day — about 67% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.64 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.28 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.40 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.88 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.71 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 56% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

21
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-03-19)
16
at the previous standard inspection (2025-01-29)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

69 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 57 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2026-03-19 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: 2802001, 2802220, 2798542, & 2737401.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors for 8 of 9 Residents (#39, #76, #86, #139, #27, #140, #37, #22) reviewed for medication errors when a.) Medication orders were transcribed and administered incorrectly and B.) medications were not administered as ordered resulting in Resident #39 receiving excessive doses of an antipsychotic medication and Resident's #76, #4, #86, #139, #27, #140, #37, #22's medications were omitted resulting in the decompensation (functional deterioration of a physical or mental system) for Resident #76, and the potential for health complications. Findings include: Resident #39 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #39 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (chronic and serious mental health condition that can significantly affect how a person thinks,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-10-12 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citaiton pertains to intake number MI00134147. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and treat pressure ulcers per nursing professional standards for 1 resident (R110) of 3 reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the worsening of a pressure ulcer with the potential for infection and overall deterioration of health status. Findings include: According to the admission Record, R110 admitted to the facility on [DATE] as his own person with diagnoses that included fracture of left femur fracture, protein-calorie malnutrition, megacolon, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease stage 3/4. Review of R110's Nursing admission Screening/History 12/9/2022 reported the resident's cognition was intact with a 3 cm (centimeter) x 3 cm area on groin, 1 cm x 8 redness on right iliac crest, and 1 cm x 8 redness on left iliac crest. Review of R110's Order Summary order date 1/16/2023 start date 1/18/2023 bilateral buttocks open area cleanse with NS (normal saline), pat dry, apply collagen to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intakes 2696710.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of abuse and neglect to the State survey agency and/or other officials when applicable for 13 (Residents #13, 22, 27, 35, 37, 41, 75, 77, 86, 97, 122, 139, and140) of 13 residents reviewed for reporting of alleged violations resulting in the State survey agency and/or nurse licensing department not being notified or notified timely, a delay in officials being aware of abuse/neglect allegations, and the potential for abuse and/or neglect to occur and/or reoccur. Findings include:Residents #13, 22, 27, 35, 37, 41, 75, 77, 86, 97, 122, 139, and 140:Review of the facility's Investigation Summary .Allegation: Potential Neglect - Medication Administration Delay, that occurred on 12/2/25, stated, .it was identified that an agency nurse (Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) NNN) assigned to the afternoon shift left the facility mid-shift without providing notice to the leadership team or completing assigned medication administration duties.for a portion of the assigned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2696710 Based on observation, int erview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents received care in accordance with professional standards in 17 (#130, #4, #5,#13,#22,#27,#35,#37,#41,#75,#77,#86,#97,#122,#139,#140,and #2) out of 17 residents reviewed for quality of care resulting in missed medications, inaccurate documentation of medications and treatments administered, medications given without order parameters, and missing neurological (neuro) assessments after unwitnessed falls. Findings include:Inaccurate documentation of medications and treatments administered Resident #130 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #130 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included end stage renal disease and chronic pain syndrome. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #130, with a reference date of 2/3/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 which indicated Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure oxygen was consistently provided per physician's orders for 2 (Residents #25 and 130) of 2 residents reviewed for respiratory care resulting in oxygen flow rates being provided above and below orders with the potential for difficulty breathing. Findings include:Resident #25: Review of Resident #25's minimum data set (MDS; resident information), dated 3/16/26, had a brief interview for mental status score of 0 which reflected she had severe cognitive impairment. Resident #25's MDS indicated she had a diagnosis of respiratory failure.Review of Resident #25's physician order for oxygen, start date 1/13/2026, indicated she was to receive oxygen via NC (nasal cannula; oxygen tubing) at a continuous flow rate of 3L (3 liters per minute). During an observation on 03/17/2026 at 10:30 AM, Resident #25 was lying in her bed with her oxygen concentrator on, her oxygen tubing was on, and the flow rate was set to 1.5 liters per minute. During an observation on 03/17/2026 at 11:40 AM, Resident #25 was lying in her bed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-03-19 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interviews, the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living.Findings Include:On 3/18/26 at 9:12 AM, observation of the underside of the three-compartment sink found a volleyball sized hole in the wall.On 3/18/26, starting at 9:42 AM, observation of station one and station three pantries found the underside cabinetry under a sink and the ice machine shows increased accumulation of debris, black spots, and water damage.On 3/18/26 at 10:35 AM, observation of the 500-hall soiled utility room found a strong odor emanating from the room. A review of the room found a mop sink positioned behind the door. The mop sink looked dry at the bottom and as this surveyor placed his hand over the floor drain of the mop sink, hot air was felt pushing up the drain, indicating the p-trap had evaporated and sewer gas was being let into the room. Further…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2749417 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced resident dignity in 1 Resident (#130) of 3 residents reviewed for dignity resulting in feelings of humiliation, frustration, embarrassment, and negative psychosocial outcomes impacting the residents' quality of life. Findings include:Resident #130Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #130 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included end stage renal disease and chronic pain syndrome. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #130, with a reference date of 2/3/26 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 which indicated Resident #130 was cognitively intact. During a medication administration observation on 3/18/2026 at 8:02 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) JJJ was preparing medications at her medication cart outside of Resident #130's room. Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: 2802001, 2802220, 2798542, & 2737401Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident representative, in advance, of care to be provided for 2 (Resident #15 and Resident #39) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights, resulting in: 1. Resident #15 receiving psychotropic medication without consent from his resident representative. 2. Resident #39 attended an offsite medical appointment without representation from her Durable Power of Attorney (DPOA).Findings include: Findings include: Resident #15 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #15 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (chronic mental health condition combining hallucinations, delusions, disorganized speech with severe mood swing, specifically mania and often depression). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 with a reference date of 2/10/26, revealed a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all residents maintained their right to self-determination for 1of 4 residents (Resident #5), reviewed for choices, resulting in Resident #5 experiencing feelings of frustration and anxiety, and interference with maintaining her highest practicable level of independence.Findings include:Resident #5Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #5 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: bipolar disorder (a chronic mental illness characterized by dramatic shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #5 with a reference date of 1/9/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 15/15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact.Review of a Care Plan for Resident # 5 with a reference date of 1/2/26 revealed the following focuses/goals/interventions: 1. Focus: The resident has a physician's order for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain accurate and consistent code status documentation and advanced directive information for 1 resident (Resident #84) of 2 residents reviewed for advanced directives (legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time), resulting in the potential for a resident's preferences for medical care to not be followed by the facility, or other healthcare providers.Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #84 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: depression and anxiety. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #84, with a reference date of [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #84 was cognitively intact.In an interview on [DATE] at 8:53 AM, Resident #84 reported that she told the facility what her wishes for emergency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: 2802001, 2802220, 2798542, & 2737401. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper notifications were made after the identification of a significant medication error for 1 (Resident #39) of 2 residents reviewed for notifications, resulting in the lack of assessments, monitoring, and potential for worsening medical conditions. Findings include:Resident #39 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #39 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (chronic and serious mental health condition that can significantly affect how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #39's Care Plan revealed, Focus: (At risk for changes in behavior & mood r/t (related to) paranoid schizophrenia .Interventions: Administer medications per physician orders. Date Initiated: 01/29/2026 .Review of the facility's Medication Error Investigation revealed,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0582 — isolated
    Give residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to issue a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) form in 2 of 3 residents (Resident #4 & #13) reviewed for timely provision of notifications, resulting in the potential for frustration and the resident or resident representative to be unaware of changes regarding financial liability.Findings include:Resident #4 Review of a Face Sheet revealed Resident #4 was a male, who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle disorder, lack of coordination, cognitive communication deficit (a breakdown in communication resulting from underlying cognitive deficits), diabetes, high blood pressure, and depression. Noted Resident #4 was not his own responsible party.Review of the Census information for Resident #4 revealed Medicare Part A was his primary payer source on 10/1/25. Noted Resident #4's last covered day of Medicare Part A services was on 12/22/25, at which point he remained in the facility and his…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 57 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2731057.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean and comfortable environment for 3 residents (R8, R108, and R12) of 4 residents reviewed for a sale/clean/comfortable homelike environment, resulting in unclean/unkempt resident rooms and the potential for cross contamination, bacterial harborage, and the potential for a reasonable person to experience feelings of embarrassment, shame, and/or loss of self -esteem. Findings include:R8According to R8's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R8 was cognitively intact with a BIMS of 13/15. Section GG-Functional Status indicated the resident was dependent on staff for transfers and did not stand or walk during this time of assessment. During an observation on 3/17/26 at 11:25 AM, there was a dresser behind R8's bed that had dust and debris under a bottle of stoma powder lying on its side, a jar of chicken bouillon, various wound and ostomy supplies, and a pair of scissors with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This incident is linked to intake 2612225.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from verbal abuse by staff for 1 resident (R14) of 3 reviewed for abuse, resulting in facility staff verbally assaulting R14 resulting in feelings of frustration, mental anguish, and a loss of autonomy (freedom from external control or influence). Findings include:According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R14 was cognitively intact as evidence of a score of 15/15 on her Brief Interview Mental Score (BIMS) with a preferred language of Kinyardwanda and needed an interpreter to communicate with doctor or health care staff. R14 was independent with her ADLs (activities of daily living) and had diagnoses that included anemia, diabetes, PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), and cirrhosis of liver. Review of R14's Care Plan dated 11/25/25, Communication concerns, Cognitive deficits, Language barrier.speaks Kinyarwanda. The goal for R14 was to continue to communicate…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolated
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2608884Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to safeguard credit card numbers for 1 resident (Resident #127) of 3 residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in a staff member making an unauthorized purchase using a resident's credit card.Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #127 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: frontotemporal neurocognitive disorder (early onset decline in cognitive function). Review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 8/13/25 at 11:08 AM regarding misappropriation for Resident #127 revealed, On 8.13.25 at approximately 10:30am, business office manager (BOM O) was on the phone with the resident's brother (Family Member (FM) SS) who handles the resident's financial transactions for billing. He stated he had had to block his old card and that was why a patient bill amount had been rejected and so he needed to establish a new card. (BOM O) asked him how…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were not prescribed PRN (as needed) psychotropic medications for greater than 14 days for 1 resident (Resident #18) of 5 residents reviewed for unnecessary medications, resulting in lack of monitoring and medical necessity documented to extend use of PRN anti-anxiety medication.Findings include: Resident #18Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #18 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: dementia with psychotic disturbance. (anxiety was not noted in diagnoses)During an observation on 03/18/2026 at 4:34 PM Resident #18 was independently walking in the hallway near the nurse's station.Review of Resident #18's IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) Progress Note dated 2/8/26 revealed, .review of unwitnessed fall.Resident has diagnosis of dementia and prefers to walk independently on the unit, with occasions of restlessness and is receiving hospice services. Intervention for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2612225.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure facility staff implemented the abuse policy in 1 of 1 residents (R108) reviewed for abuse, resulting in a delay in reporting of staff to resident verbal abuse to the state agency. Findings include: R108According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R14 was cognitively intact as evidence of a score of 15/15 on her Brief Interview Mental Score (BIMS) with a preferred language of Kinyardwanda and needed an interpreter to communicate with doctor or health care staff. R14 was independent with her ADLs (activities of daily living) and had diagnoses that included anemia, diabetes, PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder), and cirrhosis of liver.Review of R14's Care Plan dated 11/25/25, Communication concerns, Cognitive deficits, Language barrier.speaks Kinyarwanda. The goal for R14 was to continue to communicate at present level with optimal understanding. Interventions to meet the resident's goals included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for a resident admitted to hospice, in 1 resident (Resident #18) of 23 residents sampled for MDS accuracy, resulting in the potential for unassessed physical, mental, emotional, and psychosocial needs. Findings include:Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #18 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: dementia.Review of Resident #18's Hospice Election Contract revealed, .services to begin on 12/31/25.Review of Resident #18's Care Plan revealed, Hospice/Palliative Care: Resident was admitted under (name omitted) hospice care r/t (related to) dementia. Date initiated: 12/31/25.Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #18, with a reference date of 12/17/25 revealed that the resident was not receiving hospice services while in the facility during the 7-day look back period. There was no Significant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-19 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a significant change Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level 1 screening was submitted and a Level II PASARR evaluation was completed for 1 (Resident #15) of 1 resident reviewed for PASARR Screening, resulting in the potential for unmet mental health and inappropriate placement in the skilled nursing facility. Findings include:Resident #15Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #15 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: schizoaffective disorder, bipolar type (chronic mental health condition combining hallucinations, delusions, disorganized speech with severe mood swing, specifically mania and often depression).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #15 with a reference date of 2/10/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment score of 14/15, which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Section N of the MDS revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2731057.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure adequate labeling, dating/timing, and maintain cleanliness of enteral feeding equipment for 2 residents (R108 and R8) of 2 residents reviewed for enteral feeding, resulting in the potential for spoiled enteral feeding supplement and infections. Findings include:R108According to R108's Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated R108 was unable to complete the BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) and was severely cognitively impaired with a score of 00/15. Section K-Swallowing/Nutritional Status revealed nutritional approaches included R108 had a feeding tube. Diagnoses included cerebrovascular accident (CVA/stroke) and calorie-deficient malnutrition.Review of R108's Order Summary, dated 2/6/26, revealed, Enteral Feed.OFF 9:00 AM.Review of R108's Care Plan, dated 2/5/26, included a focus of Need for Feeding Tube, indicating the resident had a resident-specific treatment plan for enteral…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2802001, 2802220, 2798542, & 2737401. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify incorrect medication orders during the monthly medication regimen review for 1 of 6 residents (Resident #39), reviewed for medication regimen reviews, resulting in the unnecessary administration of an antipsychotic medication and the potential for worsening medical conditions. Findings include:Resident #39 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #39 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included paranoid schizophrenia (chronic and serious mental health condition that can significantly affect how a person thinks, feels, and behaves) and cognitive communication deficit. Review of Resident #39's Medication Regimen Review dated 1/30/26 and completed by Consulting Pharmacist (CP) AAA revealed, Based upon the information available at the time of the review, and assuming the accuracy and completeness of such information, it is my…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-03-19 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide requested immunizations to 2 of 5 residents (R12 and R108) reviewed for immunizations, resulting in the potential for acquiring, transmitting, or experiencing complications from communicable diseases. Findings include:R12According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed R12 was cognitively intact per his BIMS (Brief Interview Mental Status) of 15/15. R12 diagnoses included debility-cardiorespiratory conditions including congestive heart failure. Section O-Special Treatments, Procedures, and Programs revealed R12's pneumococcal vaccination was up to date.Review of R12's Immunizations, date not listed, indicated the vaccine was refused.Review of R12's Order Summary did not have an order for administration of the pneumococcal vaccine.During an interview and record review, on 3/19/26 at 1:05 PM, Regional Infection Control Preventionist (ICP AA) and Director of Nursing (DON) B stated while looking through resident medical charts, I am…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents' personal funds held by the facility were accessible to residents for 40 residents in the facility, including 3 (Residents #110, 104, and 114) out of the total facility census of 111 resulting in frustration and being upset without access to their money and the inability to make personal purchases.Findings include:Resident #110:During an interview on 8/6/25 at 9:48 AM, Resident #110 was visibly frustrated and upset as he reported he hasn't had access to his personal funds (money) held by the facility since the new company took over (The new ownership took over the facility on 7/1/25). Resident #110 reported that when he tried to access his money since the ownership switched, he was unable to receive his money. Resident #110 reported he wanted his money and didn't like knowing someone else had it and he couldn't access it.During an interview on 8/6/25 at 10:10 AM, Administrator in Training C confirmed residents didn't currently have access to their facility held money and the new company took over the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — pattern
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake # 1214940 & 2567893.Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' right to be free from sexual and verbal abuse by a resident in 5 of 6 residents (Resident #101, #102, #104, #103 & #105) reviewed for abuse prevention, resulting in multiple instances of resident-to-resident sexual abuse, verbal abuse, and the potential for emotional distress.Findings include:In an interview on 8/5/23 at 10:53 AM, Confidential Informant (CI) GG reported there was an incident involving potential resident-to-resident sexual abuse at the facility in July where a male resident (Resident #104) kissed two female residents (Resident #101 & #102) who were unable to consent due to cognitive impairment. Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included schizoaffective disorder, depressive type, dementia, and insomnia. Noted Resident #101 was not her own responsible party. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #101, with a reference date of 6/17/25,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — pattern
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake # 1214940 & 2567893.Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of resident-to-resident sexual and verbal abuse to the State Agency in a timely manner in 5 of 6 residents (Resident #101, #102, #104, #103, & #105) reviewed for abuse prevention and reporting, resulting in the potential for incomplete investigations, and further instances of abuse to go unreported.Findings include:In an interview on 8/5/23 at 10:53 AM, Confidential Informant (CI) GG reported there was an incident involving potential resident-to-resident sexual abuse at the facility in July where a male resident (Resident #104) kissed two female residents (Resident #101 & #102) who were unable to consent due to cognitive impairment. CI GG reported Administrator A was notified of the abuse allegations but did not report the allegations to the State Agency. CI GG reported Resident #104 made inappropriate sexual statements to another resident (Resident #103) and Administrator A did not report the additional allegation to the State Agency. CI GG reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-07 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes #1214940, 2568025, 2569731, and 2583148.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident care needs for 7 (Residents #103, 105, 110, 111, 112, 106, and 109) of 14 residents reviewed for staffing, resulting in feelings of staff not knowing their needs, medications being administered late, extended call light wait times, and negative resident emotions. Findings include:Resident #103: During an interview on 8/6/25 at 8:54 AM, Resident #103 reported her experience living at the facility with staffing levels was “not good”. Resident #103 stated, “They (the facility staff) don’t respond to your call light timely” and reported there isn’t enough help from the staff. Resident #103 felt the staff numbers working each day were lower and worse than they were before the switch of the company/ownership last month (7/1/25; the facility switched ownership). Resident #103 reported the facility now had lots of agency staff, but the agency…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-07 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake # 2568025.Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify family of a change in resident condition requiring hospitalization in 1 of 3 residents (Resident #107) reviewed for notification of changes, resulting in family being unaware of a resident's decline with resulting hospitalization and the potential for emotional distress.Findings include:In an interview on 8/5/25 at 3:08 PM, Family Member Z reported Resident #107 was sent to the hospital on 7/18/25 due to difficulty breathing. Family Member Z reported she was the one to receive phone calls/notifications when changes occurred, but that day no one from the facility contacted her to inform her of Resident #107's change in condition or hospital transfer. Family Member Z reported she first became aware of Resident #107's condition when the hospital Social Worker called her to inform her that Resident #107 was unresponsive. Family Member Z stated .I never got a chance to speak to her (Resident #107) again .Resident #107Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #107 was a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-07 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2574473Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely and consistent ADL (activities of daily living) care to 1 resident (Resident #109) of 3 reviewed for ADL care, resulting the resident experiencing back pain from remaining in bed, missing showers, feelings of frustration, and embarrassment.Findings include:Resident #109Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #109 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: fracture of shaft of humerus (upper arm), left arm, fracture of fifth lumbar vertebra (lower spine), unspecified fall and encephalopathy (condition in which functioning of the brain is affected by an agent or condition).Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #109 with a reference date of 7/15/25, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15 which indicated Resident #109 was moderately cognitively impaired. Section F revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-29 · tag F0680 — widespread
    Ensure the activities program is directed by a qualified professional.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to employ an Activity Director who possessed the required qualifications resulting in the potential for unmet psychosocial needs, feelings of boredom and a lack of person-centered activities. This citation has the potential to impact all 126 residents within the facility. Findings include: Review of certification standards of the National Certification Council for Activity Professionals revealed ADC (Activity Director Certified) Certification ensures an individual has the knowledge and skills to lead and direct an activities and life enrichment department. ADC Certification validates the competencies necessary to be an Activity Director including leadership, management, advocacy, care planning and documentation. Review of a Activities Director Job Description provided by the facility revealed: Education, Training, and Experience: .eligible for certification as a therapeutic recreation specialist or activities professional qualified Occupational Therapist .has completed a training course approved by the state . In an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2025-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food in the kitchen. Findings include: An initial kitchen/food service tour was conducted on 1/27/25 beginning at 9:46 AM with Food Service Director (FSD) II. The following observations/interviews were completed: At 9:50 AM in the freezer, it was noted that cases of hamburger patties, Salisbury steaks, and egg patties were opened but were not securely closed (to prevent contamination). FSD II reported the food products should have been securely closed after opening. There was a frozen pickle slice on the floor of the freezer, and it was noted that there was a buildup of dirt, grime, and debris underneath the food storage racks and in the corners of the floor. There was a plastic cover over the sprinkler head in the ceiling that was broken in half, part of which was on the freezer floor in the corner underneath a storage rack.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY DPS B Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in water borne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among any or all the residents in the facility. Findings include: During an observation of the kitchen, at 10:32 AM on 1/28/25, it was observed that a water line was found coming out from behind the two-door reach in cooler where an ice machine used to be located. An interview with Maintenance Director (MD) I, at 10:42 AM on 1/28/25, in the kitchen, found that he was unaware of the water line. When asked about how the facility handles flushing stagnant water lines. MD I stated that he goes to vacant rooms to flush them once a month. When asked about minimal use or unused fixtures in the facility, MD I stated his focus…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00147770 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of 4 (Resident #26, Resident #55, Resident #57 and Resident #112) of 25 residents reviewed for dignity, and 3 of 6 residents who attended a confidential meeting, resulting in feelings of decreased self-worth, frustration, and residents receiving assistance with eating in a disrespectful manner. Findings include: Review of a Dignity and Respect facility policy, with a reference date of 7/11/18, revealed: The staff shall display respect for Resident's when speaking with, caring or (sic), or talking about them. Resident #26 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #26, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: major depressive disorder (persistent depressed mood causing significant impairment in daily life) and generalized anxiety disorder (severe, ongoing anxiety that interferes with daily activities). Review of a Minimum…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-01-29 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide individualized activities for 4 of 6 Residents (Resident #26, Resident #39, Resident #42 and Resident #55) reviewed for activities, resulting in feelings of boredom, and a potential for a decline in physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of Revolutionizing the Experience of Home by Bringing Well-Being to Life: The [NAME] Alternative Domains of Well-Being, Copyright 2012, Rev. 2020, revealed The [NAME] Alternative defined one domain of wellness as Connectedness- the state of being connected; alive .engaged, involved . Without meaningful interactions the individual can become disconnected .develop loneliness, helplessness, and boredom. Review of Participating in Activities You Enjoy as You Age, published by the National Institute on Aging, 3/28/22, revealed: Research has shown that older adults with an active lifestyle: .may lower risk for developing some health problems, including dementia, heart…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — pattern
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely and consistent weight measurements; follow-up of residents at risk for altered nutrition status; and on-going nutritional assessment for 4 (Residents #59, #89, #111, and #121) of 5 residents reviewed for nutritional care and services, resulting in missed re-weights (Resident #59), incomplete nutrition status monitoring of a tube fed resident with a stage IV pressure ulcer (Resident #111), inconsistent weight measurements for a newly admitted resident (Resident #121), missed nutritional assessments (Resident #89, #111) and the potential for unidentified weight loss, nutritional status decline, and unmet nutritional needs for all residents. Findings include: Review of the policy Nutrition Monitoring & Management Program Adopted 7/11/2018 revealed, POLICY: It is the policy of this facility to ensure that all residents maintain acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight and protein levels; unless the resident's clinical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain a safe, functional, sanitary, and comfortable environment for residents, staff and the public. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living, affecting residents in following areas: Findings Include: During a tour of the facility, at 1:18 PM on 1/28/25, a review of empty resident room [ROOM NUMBER] found an accumulation of dust, dirt, sand, and dead ants under the register on the far side of the room. During a tour of the 600 hall spa room, by resident room [ROOM NUMBER], at 1:21 PM on 1/28/25, it was observed that the spa room was hot and humid upon entering the room. A temperature of the wall with an infra-red thermometer found it to be 82F with moisture dripping down the windowsills. Aluminum window frame was observed with black spots and accumulation of black debris. Black debris was able to be wiped away from the window frame with a paper towel. Further review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for 1 (Resident #27) of 5 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs, resulting in the inability to call for staff assistance, and potential unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #27 Review of admission Record revealed Resident #27 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included unsteadiness of feet. Review of Resident #27's Care Plan revealed, (Resident #27) has communication and/or comprehension concern r/t ( related to) Hearing deficit, deconditioning, diagnosis of Dementia. Date Initiated: 11/12/2024 .Interventions: Ensure/provide a safe environment: call light in reach . Date initiated: 11/12/2024 . During an observation on 1/27/25 at 9:52 AM, Resident #27 was lying in his bed. It was noted that Resident #27's touch pad call light was lying on the floor behind Resident #27's bed and out of his reach. Resident #27 reported that he would use his call…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake # MI00149017. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to report allegations of abuse to the State Agency in a timely manner in 2 of 2 residents (Resident #115 & #127) reviewed for abuse and reporting, resulting in the potential for additional allegations of abuse and to go unreported and delayed investigation. Findings include: Review of the policy/procedure Abuse and Neglect, dated 3/24/23, revealed .Abuse (is) defined as the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain or mental anguish .All allegations of abuse will be reported to the appropriate State Agencies immediately after the initial allegation is received . Resident #115 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #115 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #115, with a reference date of 11/4/24, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation and record review, the facility failed to complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments that accurately reflect resident status in 1 of 25 residents (Resident #121), resulting in an inaccurate reflection of resident status and the potential for physical complications due to unidentified needs. Findings include: Resident #121 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #121 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: heart attack and tracheostomy (a surgical procedure that creates an opening in the front of the neck to provide airway and allow breathing) care. Review of a MDS assessment for Resident #121, with a reference date of 12/18/24 revealed the resident did not receive tracheostomy services while a resident. Review of Resident #121's Physician Orders revealed, Change all trach related supplies: nebulizer tubing, corrugated tubing, trach mask, overflow container, suction parts, etc. On Sunday night shift every week as needed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Level II Preadmission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) evaluation was completed for 1 (Resident #55) of 4 residents reviewed for PASARR Screening, resulting in the potential for unmet mental health and psychiatric care needs. Findings include: Resident #55 Review of admission Record revealed Resident # 55 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included psychotic disorder with delusions. Review of Resident #55s Preadmission Screening (PAS) Annual Resident Review (ARR) Level I Screening dated 2/5/24 indicated the following: Questions 1-4 in section II were marked Yes: 1. Resident #55 had a current diagnosis of mental illness and dementia. 2. Resident #55 had received treatment for mental illness. 3. Resident #55 had routinely received one or more prescribed antipsychotic or antidepressant medications within the last 14 days. 4. There is presenting evidence of mental illness or dementia, including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement comprehensive care plans in 3 of 25 residents (Resident #73, #97, & #27) reviewed for comprehensive care plans, resulting in the potential for unmet medical, physical, mental, and psychosocial needs. Findings include: Review of the Long-Term Care Facility Resident Assessment Instrument 3.0 User's Manual, v1.19.1, Chapter 4: Care Area Assessment (CAA) Process and Care Planning, dated October 2024, revealed .the comprehensive care plan is an interdisciplinary communication tool. It must include measurable objectives and time frames and must describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. The care plan must be reviewed and revised periodically, and the services provided or arranged must be consistent with each resident's written plan of care . According to [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME];…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards of practice for wound care and documentation of meal intake in 3 of 25 residents (Resident #230, #27, & #89) reviewed for professional standards, resulting in missed wound treatments and inaccurate documentation. Findings include: The health care provider (physician or advanced practice nurse) is responsible for directing medical treatment. Nurses follow health care providers' orders unless they believe that the orders are in error, violate agency policy, or are harmful to the patient. [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing - E-Book (Kindle Locations 20717-20719). Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition. A health care provider's order for changing a dressing indicates the dressing type, the frequency of changing, and any solutions or ointments to be applied to the wound. [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME].…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly assess a resident after a fall in 1 (Resident #48) of 25 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in a potential for unidentified injuries after a fall. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #48 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: unsteadiness on feet. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #48, with a reference date of 11/19/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 13/15 which indicated Resident #48 was cognitively intact. Section J revealed Resident #48 experienced almost constant pain and two or more falls during the assessment period. Review of a Care Plan for Resident # 48, with a reference date of 1/15/25, revealed a focus/goal/interventions of: (Resident #48) is at risk for falls .Goal: (Resident #48) will remain free from fall related injury .Interventions: .anti roll backs to wheelchair .gripper socks…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0699 — isolated
    Provide care or services that was trauma informed and/or culturally competent.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that a resident who was a trauma survivor received care and services that addressed their psychosocial needs for 1 (Resident #39) of 25 residents reviewed for trauma-informed care, resulting in a potential for Resident #39 to experience re-traumatization. Findings include: Review of Trauma-Informed Therapy Explained, 2/16/24, PositivePsychology.com, revealed: Trauma-Informed care, a vital approach in mental health, acknowledges trauma's impact and aims to establish a safe, healing environment .trauma informed care involves being mindful of potential triggers to prevent re-traumatization . Resident #39 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #39 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included: major depressive disorder (persistent sad or depressed mood that impacts daily life) anxiety disorder, and dementia (general term for loss of memory, language, problem solving or other abilities that are…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-01-29 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to facilitate outside dental services in a timely manner for 1 of 1 residents (Resident #55) reviewed for dental care, resulting in Resident #55 having prolonged poor condition of teeth, and the potential for a life threatening infection. Findings include: Resident #55 Review of admission Record revealed Resident # 55 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included huntington's disease (a condition which causes nerve cells in the brain to break down over time). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #55, with a reference date of 11/27/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 99/15 which indicated Resident #55 was severely cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #55's Medical Practitioner Progress Note dated 6/6/24 and documented by Nurse Practitioner (NP) ZZ revealed, .(Resident #55) recently missed appointment with (local facility dental service provider) because he…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-10-24 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide written notification of the facility bed hold policy upon discharge to an acute care hospital for 2 (Resident #102 and #103) of 3 residents reviewed for emergency hospital transfer resulting in the potential for unanticipated expense or the loss of desired room placement in the facility. Findings include: Resident #102 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #102 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness. Review of Resident #102's Acute Care Transfer note dated 10/18/24 revealed, (Resident #102) transferred to hospital .Statement that Bed Hold Policy & Facility Initiated Transfer for Nursing Home forms Provided? Medication list and facesheet sent with (Resident #102) . It was noted that there was no documentation noted to indicate written notification of the facility bed hold policy was provided upon discharge. Resident #103 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00147492 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to address an acute change of condition and notify the physician of symptoms of increased lethargy (abnormal drowsiness), right upper extremity weakness, asymmetry (unequal) on the right side of face, decreased grip strength, increased pain, warmth, and swelling in the right knee in 1 (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the delay of treatment and interventions in the diagnosis of subacute cerebral vascular accident (CVA) (Stroke) and acute RLE (right lower extremity) DVT (deep vein thrombosis). Findings include: According to the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, It should be noted when signs and symptoms of a stroke begin, because the length of time they have been present may guide treatment decisions. Seek immediate medical attention if you notice any signs or symptoms of a stroke, even if they seem to fluctuate or disappear. Call 911 or your local…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident safety with eating assistance for 1 (Resident #101) of 4 residents reviewed for accidents/hazards resulting in the potential for accidents and serious injury. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included aphasia (language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate) following cerebral infarction (stroke) and dysphasia (difficulty swallowing). Review of Resident #101's Orders revealed, Regular Diet: Dysphagia/pureed/NDD1 (National Dysphagia 1 Diet) texture, regular fluid, thin consistency, 1:1: assist, 1 tsp at a time. Order start date: 10/21/24 . Review of Resident #101's Kardex (care plan orders for Certified Nursing Assistants) revealed, Foods/Fluids: .Ensure (Resident #101's) HOB (head of bed) is elevated at 90 degrees for all meals. Pureed diet, all thin liquids given with spoon.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake #MI00146336. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision to prevent elopement and respond appropriately to the alarm system in 1 of 3 residents (Resident #103) reviewed for wandering/elopement, resulting in Resident #103 exiting the facility unbeknownst to staff and the potential for injury. Findings include: Review of the policy/procedure Elopement, dated 2/5/20, revealed .It is the policy of this facility that all residents are afforded adequate supervision to provide the safest environment possible. All residents will be assessed for behaviors or conditions that put them at risk for wandering/elopement. All residents so identified will have these issues addressed in their individual plan of care .Residents who have been assessed at risk for elopement/wandering shall be provided at least one of the following safety precautions by the facility .An adult electronic monitoring safety device will be used to notify/alert staff by sounding an alarm when the resident enters the perimeter around an alarmed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00146994. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in 1 of 4 residents (Resident #107) reviewed for accuracy of medical records, resulting in an inaccurate behavior record and the potential for providers to not have an accurate picture of resident status and condition. Findings include: According to [NAME], [NAME] A.; [NAME], [NAME] Griffin; Stockert, [NAME]; Hall, [NAME]. Fundamentals of Nursing.High-quality documentation is necessary to enhance efficient, individualized patient care. Quality documentation has five important characteristics: it is factual, accurate, complete, current, and organized . Accessed from: Kindle Locations 24106-24108). Elsevier Health Sciences. Kindle Edition. Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #107 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included dementia, high blood pressure, malnutrition, chronic pain, and a history of falls. Review of a Minimum Data…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement posted transmission-based precautions and don required Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) prior to entering COVID-19 positive resident rooms in 2 of 2 rooms reviewed for transmission-based precautions, resulting in the potential for cross-contamination and the development and spread of infection to a vulnerable population. Findings include: Review of the policy/procedure COVID-19 Core Practices, dated 5/11/23, revealed .The facility will follow recommended routine infection prevention and control (IPC) practices during the COVID-19 pandemic .Resident placement for suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) .It is recommended that the door to the room remain closed to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 .Staff members entering a resident room with suspected or confirmed SARS-CoV-2 should use all recommended PPE, which includes use of a NIOSH approved N95 or equivalent or higher-level respirator, eye protection (eye goggles or a face shield that covers the front and sides of the face), gloves, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and ensure the right to safe self-administration of medication in 1 (Resident #105) of 3 residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in the potential for unsafe self-administration of medication, medication errors, and medications not being stored in a secure manner. Findings include: Resident #105 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #105 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included: anemia in other chronic diseases; hemiplegia (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body), unspecified affect; dysphagia (swallowing difficulty), oropharyngeal phase; and bipolar disorder, unspecified. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #105, with a reference date of 4/1/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #105 was cognitively intact. During an observation and interview on 4/23/24 at 10:54 AM, Resident #105, who granted permission for this surveyor to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0573 — isolated
    Let each resident or the resident's legal representative access or purchase copies of all the resident's records.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake: MI00143463. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to respond timely to a request for medical records in 1 (Resident #105) of 6 residents reviewed for resident rights, resulting in delayed access to the resident's medical records and resident frustration. Findings include: Resident #105 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #105 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included: PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder). Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #105, with a reference date of 4/1/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #105 was cognitively intact. In an interview on 4/23/24 at 10:54 AM, Resident #105 reported that on 2/12/24, he had asked one of the nurse aides how to get a copy of his medical records. Resident #105 went on to say that the aide explained the process to him, he followed the protocol, but didn't get any response. Resident #105 reported he waited a few days and still didn't get any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-04-25 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00143329. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to implement their Abuse and Neglect policy following an incident of visitor to resident verbal abuse in 1 (Resident #104) of 6 residents reviewed for abuse resulting in a delay in reporting the Facility Reported Incident (FRI) to the State Agency and a delay in the removal of the visitor pending an investigation. Findings include: Resident #104 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #104 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included: acquired absence of left leg (amputation), acquired absence of right leg (amputation) major depressive disorder, and cognitive communication deficit. Review of a FRI Intake Information report revealed, Date of Alleged Event: 02/29/2024 Time: 3:00 PM .Facility incident report received via online submission on: 3/1/24, 2:58 PM .Investigation Summary .Date of Incident: 2/29/2024 @ (at) 3:00 pm Brief Description of Event: At approximately 3:00 pm on 2/29/2024, (Resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement care planned interventions or document refusals of care planned interventions to prevent further skin breakdown for 1 (Resident #109) of 3 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention, resulting in the potential for further skin breakdown, worsening of existing pressure ulcers, infection, and overall deterioration in health status. Findings include: Resident #109 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #109 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included: end-stage renal (kidney) disease, type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition where the body is not able to properly use sugar from the blood), and pressure ulcer of other site, unstageable. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #109, with a reference date of 4/8/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #109 was cognitively intact. Review of Resident #109's current Care Plan revealed a focus of The resident has DTI (deep tissue…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-04-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00142037. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely and consistent documented follow-up by a qualified nutrition professional following significant weight loss and skin breakdown in 1 (Resident #101) of 3 residents reviewed for nutritional care resulting in undocumented re-evaluation and assessment of resident nutritional needs and care and the potential for unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: Resident #101 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #101 was a male, admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 2/3/24, with pertinent diagnoses which included: multiple sclerosis. Review of a Mini Nutritional Assessment for Resident #101 dated 12/28/23 and completed by Registered Dietitian (RD) D revealed a risk score of 10 which indicated resident was at risk of malnutrition. Review of a Dietary Evaluation for Resident #101 completed by RD D on 1/8/24 revealed, .II B. Most Recent Weight 191.0 Date 12/27/23 C. Most Recent Height 70.0 Date…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-12 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a written reason and/or give notifications of the transfer/discharge for 3 residents (#48, #72, & #115 ) reviewed for hospitalizations/transfers/discharges, resulting in the Long-Term Care Ombudsman not being notified of transfers/discharges and the potential for residents and/or family being un-informed of the reason for transfer/discharge. Findings include: Resident #48 Review of Resident #48's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed: Progress note: on 7/6/2023 Resident #48 was transferred to the Emergency Room (ER) for Acute Care Transfer .Observations and Assessment (Reason for Transfer): (Resident #48) hypotensive/dizzy post unwitnessed fall. Medical Provider Notification and Orders: (send to) ER for evaluation Review of Resident #48's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) revealed: Progress note: on 7/20/2023 Resident #48 was transferred to the Emergency Room (ER) for Acute Care Transfer .Observations and Assessment (Reason for Transfer): (Resident #48) abnormal vital signs: hypotensive, tachycardic, febrile,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-01-12 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow standards of practice and ensure 1.) proper hand hygiene was completed during meal services, as well as when staff entered and exited resident rooms which included Transmission Based Precaution (TBP) rooms for residents with infections including but not limited to Covid-19 2.) failed to ensure required PPE supplies/equipment were available to staff and visitors for use prior to entering TBP rooms, resulting in the potential for the introduction of infection, cross-contamination, and disease transmission. Findings include: During an observation on 1/09/24 at 2:08 PM in the hall outside of room [ROOM NUMBER] the hand sanitizer machine was not working properly. According to the admission Record, R228 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acquired absence of right leg, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. During an observation and record review on 1/9/2024 at 2:10 PM, R228's door had signage stating,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure call lights were in reach for 1(Resident #105 ) of 2 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs resulting in the resident's inability to call for staff assistance with the potential for unmet care needs. Findings include: Resident #105 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #105 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included difficulty in walking and muscle weakness. Review of Resident #105's Care Plan revealed, (Resident #105) is at risk for falls r/t (related to) left-sided paralysis and expressive aphasia (difficulty producing speech) r/t MVA (motor vehicle accident). Date initiated: 11/15/22 .Interventions .Be sure call light is within reach, provide cueing and reminders for use as appropriate due to level of cognition. Date initiated: 4/12/23 . Review of Resident #105's Care Plan revealed, (Resident #105) has a communication and/or comprehension concern r/t Receptive…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain a resident's advanced directive (Code status) for 1 resident (R228) of 25 residents reviewed for advanced directives resulting in the potential for failing to follow the resident's code status wishes. Findings include: According to the admission Record, R228 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included acquired absence of right leg, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic kidney disease. During an interview on 1/11/2024 at 10:30 AM, R228 stated, No one has asked me what I wanted for code status when I was admitted . It was noted during conversations, the resident was alert, oriented (person, place, time, date, and why he was at the facility), and able to hold a sensical conversation with humor. During an interview and record review on 1/11/2024 at 1:30 PM, Social Worker (SW) U stated when reviewing R228's medical records, It was brought to my attention today, that (R228's) code status was not done. The admission nurse usually does…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify the responsible party of a change in resident condition in 1 of 25 residents (R99) reviewed for notification of changes, resulting in the resident representative not being made aware of a dental abscess resulting in the lack of ability to participate in timely medical decision-making. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], R99 was cognitively impaired with a score of 5/15 on his BIMS (Brief Interview Status). Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and depression. Section J-Pain Management reported the resident had not been on a scheduled, PRN (as needed), or non-medication intervention for pain management regimen in the last 5 days of the quarterly OBRA quarterly review. Section L-Dental did not have documentation regarding R99's dental status. Further review of R99's MDS admission assessment dated , 6/19/2023, reported that the resident did have tooth fragments or missing natural teeth (edentulous),…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0644 — isolated
    Coordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Resident #76 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #76 was a male, with pertinent diagnoses which included: mild cognitive impairment and psychotic disorder with delusions. On 1/10/24 at 1:08 PM, Resident #76's medical record was reviewed for evidence of facility coordination with OBRA (Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act) for Preadmission Screening and Annual Review (PASARR) Level II screening. A review of a document dated 9/12/22 from State of Michigan Department of Health and Human Services for Resident #76 revealed, To Whom It May Concern: (OBRA Representative name omitted) completed an OBRA Level II Evaluation on the above-named individual and made the recommendation on placement and services. Based on the information provided by this agency, The State of Michigan Department of Health and Human Services made the following .If the above-named individual remains in the nursing facility, a Level II Evaluation is needed by September 11, 2023. A review of Resident #76's medical record revealed no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake MI00141497. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement an effective discharge planning process and complete an accurate discharge plan of care in 1 of 2 residents (R128) reviewed for discharge, resulting in the resident being discharged without planned housing or medical care. Findings include: During an interview on 1/04/2024 at 3:14 PM, Complainant JJJ stated, (R128) did not have discharge papers or a discharge plan when he came here. He is an older man and would die on the streets if he had no other place to go. When (name of facility) discharged him, he had to walk across 4 lanes of a very busy divided road (name of a State of Michigan highway) while using a walker. He then used every cent of money he had on a hotel room. The manager from that hotel called us (name of a transitional housing for homeless men). (R128) came with no medications, no clothes, no doctor; just came with the clothes on his back and a walker. He was told by the facility his insurance days were up. My facility has taken other residents from them…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the failed to 1.) perform neurological checks after falls for 2 (Resident #110 and #70) of 25 sampled residents, and 2.) ensure that a provider assessment was completed when requested by the Registered Dietician for 1 (Resident #70) of 25 sampled residents reviewed for quality of care resulting in the lack of assessment, monitoring, and documentation and the potential for the worsening of a medical condition and the delay in treatment. Findings include: Resident #110 Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #110, was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included muscle weakness and difficulty in walking. Review of Resident #110's eINTERACT SBAR Summary for Providers note dated 1/8/24 revealed, Situation: The change in condition/s reported on this CIC evaluation are/were: Fall .Outcomes of physical assessment: no information was entered. Positive findings reported on the resident/patient evaluation for this change…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolated
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to clean and store BiPAP (bilevel positive airway pressure) equipment (a treatment used for sleep apnea - pressurized air is provided through a mask to prevent collapse of the airway) according to the physician's order for 1 resident (Resident #91) of 1 resident reviewed for respiratory care, resulting in an increased potential for respiratory infection and respiratory distress. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #91 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included obesity, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, and obstructive sleep apnea. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #91, with a reference date of 11/13/2023 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated Resident #91 was moderately cognitively impaired. Review of Resident #91's active Physician's Order, started 8/3/2023, revealed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure adequate pain monitoring and management for 1 resident (R99) of 25 residents reviewed for pain management, resulting in unrelieved dental pain that impacted the resident's eating and functional status of life. Findings included: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], R99 was cognitively impaired with a score of 5/15 on his BIMS (Brief Interview Status). Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and depression. Section J-Pain Management reported the resident had not been on a scheduled, PRN (as needed), or non-medication intervention for pain management regimen in the last 5 days of the quarterly OBRA quarterly review. Section L-Dental did not have documentation regarding R99's dental status. Further review of R99's MDS admission assessment dated , 6/19/2023, reported that the resident did not have tooth fragments or missing natural teeth (edentulous), broken natural teeth, mouth or facial pain, discomfort, or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate dental extraction services, for 1 resident (R99) of 1 resident reviewed for dental care, resulting in delayed dental services and treatment, on-going tooth pain, and an abscessed tooth. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], R99 was cognitively impaired with a score of 5/15 on his BIMS (Brief Interview Status). Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and depression. Section J-Pain Management reported the resident had not been on a scheduled, PRN (as needed), or non-medication intervention for pain management regimen in the last 5 days of the quarterly OBRA quarterly review. Section L-Dental did not have documentation regarding R99's dental status. Further review of R99's MDS admission assessment dated , 6/19/2023, reported that the resident did not have tooth fragments or missing natural teeth (edentulous), broken natural teeth, mouth or facial pain, discomfort, or difficulty with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-12 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received food in an appropriate texture to optimize intake and meet individual needs for 1 resident (R99) of 25 residents reviewed for food and drink, resulting in food being difficult to chew and decreased food acceptance. Findings include: According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], R99 was cognitively impaired with a score of 5/15 on his BIMS (Brief Interview Status). Diagnoses included Alzheimer's disease, dementia, and depression. During an observation and interview on 1/9/2024 at 12:00 PM, Family Member (FM) FFF observed R99 with Surveyor. R99 sat himself up to the edge of his bed, opened his lunch tray. He opened an ice cream cup, place it in the right side of his mouth. The lower left side of his face appeared swollen. The resident did not eat any other food. R99 stated while placing his hand on the left side of his face, My tooth hurts. I cannot eat anything else. During an observation and interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-12 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records in 1 (Resident #24) of 25 residents reviewed for accuracy of medical records, resulting in the potential for providers to not have an accurate picture of resident status and condition. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #24 was a female, with pertinent diagnoses which included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis (muscle weakness or partial paralysis on one side of the body), vascular dementia, and type 2 diabetes mellitus (a condition where the body is not able to properly use sugar from the blood). Review of a Physician's Order for Resident #24 revealed, Blue boot to right foot while in bed as tolerated every shift for DTI (deep tissue injury) Verbal Active Order Date 09/26/2023 Start Date 09/27/2023 Review of Resident #24's MAR/TAR (Medication Administration Record / Treatment Administration Record) for October, 2023 revealed opportunities (check boxes) for documentation of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-10-12 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00132640. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure post dialysis communication, assessment, and monitoring for 1 Resident (Resident #115) of 11 resident reviewed for quality of care, resulting in the potential for the resident to not meet her highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings include: Review of an admission Record revealed Resident #115 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses which included end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. Review of a current Care Plan focus for Resident #115, with a revision date of 1/5/2022, revealed resident #115 required hemodialysis for end stage renal disease. Review of current dialysis Care Plan interventions for Resident #115, initiated 1/5/2022, revealed staff were directed to monitor Resident #115's shunt site and vitals signs as directed and as needed. In a telephone interview on 10/10/2023 at 10:49 AM, Family Member Y reported they visited…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Greenfield Rehab and Nursing CenterRoyal Oak, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Bloomfield HillBloomfield Hills, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of WhitehallWhitehall, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of WyomingWyoming, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grand RapidsGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of KingsfordKingsford, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Three RiversThree Rivers, MI 1 of 5Pickaway Manor Care CenterCircleville, OH 1 of 5The Lakeland CenterSouthfield, MI 1 of 5West Park Care Center LLCColumbus, OH 2 of 5Monterey Care CenterGrove City, OH 2 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of MuskegonMuskegon, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation at St. FrancisSaginaw, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of CantonCanton, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn HeigDearborn Heights, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of TroyTroy, MI 2 of 5Woodward Hills Health and Rehabilitation CenterBloomfield Hills, MI 3 of 5Belle Fountain Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterRiverview, MI 3 of 5Canal Winchester Care CenterCanal Winchester, OH 3 of 5Evergreen Health and Rehabilitation CenterSouthfield, MI 3 of 5Four Seasons Nursing Center of WestlandWestland, MI 3 of 5Grand TheDublin, OH 3 of 5Mill Run Care CenterHilliard, OH 3 of 5New Albany Care CenterColumbus, OH 3 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at LeonardGrand Rapids, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of IoniaIonia, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen ParkAllen Park, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Ann ArborAnn Arbor, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Sterling HeigSterling Heights, MI 3 of 5RiverviewColumbus, OH 3 of 5ShorePointe Nursing CenterSt. Clair Shores, MI 4 of 5Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation CenterLivonia, MI 4 of 5Shelby Health and Rehabilitation CenterShelby Township, MI 5 of 5Abbyshire Place Health And Rehabilitation Center LBidwell, OH 5 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grosse PointeGrosse Pointe Woods, MI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
OM HOLDCO 7 LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2025
PINAL R. PATEL 2020 IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST UAD 10-6-2020Organization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2025
PATEL, RAJANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE OFFICERsince 07/01/2025
OPTUM MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS. INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
LINK, ERICIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
MILLER-GILL, DESHONIQUEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2025
NWANKWO, UCHEBIKEIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
SHARON, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2025
2320 E BELTLINE AVE SE PROPCO LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
SCHLAUPITZ MADHAVANOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
WELLTOWER OP, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025
CONNER, MARIANNEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2025

CMS files one row per role, so the 17 rows in the source record cover these 13 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$15.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-21.5%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense8% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 77%Medicare 4%Other / private 19%

About 77% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$403per resident / day
operating cost
$12,249per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$332per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235103. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-03-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next