Pickaway Manor Care Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

56.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 87 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.36 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 62% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 99 beds and averages 80.2 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 19 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.75 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.23 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.34 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.92 on weekdays — 15% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.61 to 0.44 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

21 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 9 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · J2026-01-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, observation, resident and staff interviews, wound physician interview, review of wound notes, review of hospital records, review of information from the National Pressure Injury Advisory Panel (NPIAP), review of specifications for air mattresses, and policy review, the facility failed to ensure the physician ordered treatments were completed as directed and failed to ensure interventions were implemented to prevent the development of, worsening of and promote the healing of an avoidable facility acquired pressure ulcer for Resident #5. Resident #5 was at risk for pressure ulcer development and dependent on staff for activities of daily living (ADLs) including transfers, and toileting and required max assist with bed mobility, turning and repositioning, and had a known sacrum stage IV pressure ulcer (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough, a yellowish, stringy dead tissue or eschar, a layer of dead, dry tissue that forms a dark leathery scab over the ulcer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-07-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
  Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, hospital record review, review of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center information, review of facility policy and procedures, and staff interviews, the facility failed to provide timely, necessary and adequate care and services following an acute change in condition on 05/21/25 involving Resident #22, when the resident was assessed to have a decline in health including lethargy, a poor appetite, confusion, increased hallucinations, and low oxygen saturation, without evidence of timely or adequate interventions and medical treatment. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and serious life-threatening harm, and/or injuries when Resident #22 developed new deep tissue injuries (DTIs) and suffered a continued decline in health status. Resident #22 continued to display a deterioration in condition between 05/22/25 and 05/29/25 that was not comprehensively addressed and individualized medical interventions provided. Consequently, on 05/29/25 at 9:30 P.M., Resident #22 was transferred…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2026-01-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
  Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and facility policy review, the facility failed to implement and maintain a comprehensive Quality Assurance Improvement Program (QAPI) program and plan to address care issues and/or concerns in the facility. This had the potential to affect all 84 residents who reside in the facility. The facility census was 84.Review of the Quality Assurance (QA) committee attendance records for the previous 12 months revealed QA meetings were held at the end of each month starting with January 2025. Specifically for the September 26, 2025, meeting, review of prevention/interventions for residents with pressure ulcers were discussed, but Resident #41 and Resident #5 were not discussed separately and identified as ongoing issues with their care.The findings for the annual survey, dated 01/05/26 revealed noncompliance in the area of pressure ulcer care, which included prevention and treatments, resulting in substandard quality of care with an Immediate Jeopardy beginning on 08/14/25 for Resident #5, and an Actual Harm, beginning on 08/26/25 to Resident #41.The…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility provided food storage policies, the facility failed to ensure food was protected from potential spoilage and/or contamination in the areas of food storage and food preparation. This had the potential to affect all 83 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 84. Findings include:Observation on 01/05/26 at 8:40 A.M. revealed an opened bag of small frozen pizzas was stored with the bag open, exposing the food to air and potential contaminants in the reach-in freezer. Further observation at this time revealed a bag of frozen chicken fingers was also stored with the bag open, so that the food was exposed to air and there was no date marking on the opened bag of chicken fingers. Interview on 01/05/26 at 8:41 A.M. with Dining Services Manager #1011 revealed food items such as the frozen pizzas and frozen chicken fingers should be date-marked once they have been opened. Further interview at this time verified foods should be stored in closed containers or otherwise wrapped to protect from potential…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · E2026-01-29 · tag F0836 — pattern
  Ensure the facility is licensed under applicable State and local law and operates and provides services in compliance with all applicable Federal, State, and local laws, regulations, and codes, and with accepted professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, interviews, and facility policies, the facility failed to ensure Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN's) acted within their professional standards and their scope of training related to pressure ulcer wound assessments and staging's. This affected four Residents (#5, #41, #99, and #82) out of six reviewed for pressure ulcer assessments and staging's by facility staff. The facility census was 84. 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #5, revealed an admission date of 12/3/24. Diagnoses included but were not limited to type 2 diabetes, central cord syndrome at cervical 5 level of cervical spinal cord, specified disorder of muscle, generalized anxiety disorder and major depressive disorder. Review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 12 out of 15 which suggested moderate cognitive intactness. The resident was assessed to require substantial/maximal assistance with shower/bathe self, bed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record reviews, observations, interviews, and facility policies, the facility failed to perform hand hygiene before and after wearing contact precautions when passing a lunch tray to Resident #21. This had the potential to affect 5 other residents at the facility in contact precautions who received lunch trays for meals. The facility also failed to ensure enhanced barrier precautions were ordered timely for eight Residents (#5, #41, #99, #46, #64, #52, and #82) out of eight who required enhanced barrier precautions. This had the potential to affect 5 other residents in enhanced barrier precautions. The facility census was 84.1. Review of the medical record for Resident #21 revealed the resident was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included severe chronic kidney disease, acidosis, and anemia amongst other diagnoses. Further review of the resident record revealed the resident had an active order for contact precautions during the time of the survey due to an active diagnosis of a…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
  Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview the facility failed to maintain a resident's call light within reach. This affected one resident (#25) of one sampled for call light placement. The facility census was 84.Findings include:Review of Resident #25's medical record revealed an admission date of 09/14/18, a re-entry date of 11/03/22 and diagnoses including hypertensive heart disease with heart failure, vascular dementia, major depressive disorder, history of falling, hypothyroidism, orthostatic hypotension, and other abnormalities of gait and mobility.Review of Resident #25's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of three out of 15 indicating the resident had severe cognitive impairment. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident required set up help for eating, partial/moderate assistance with moving about in the bed and was dependent on staff for toileting hygiene tasks and transferring between her chair and bed. Resident #25 was always…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to implement fall interventions as ordered. This affected two residents (#38 and #84) of two sampled for falls. The facility census was 84. Findings Include: 1. Review of Resident #38's medical record revealed an admission date of 07/30/20, a re-entry date of 11/25/23, and diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting right dominant side, major depressive disorder, vascular dementia, anxiety disorder, and congestive heart failure. Review of Resident #38's quarterly minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 13 indicating the resident was cognitively intact. Further review of the MDS revealed the resident required supervision or touching assistance with toileting hygiene, bed mobility, and transfers, had no pain in the five days prior to the assessment, had not fallen since the previous MDS assessment and had no…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
  Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to properly maintain an indwelling catheter for one resident (#21) of one sampled for catheter use. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of Resident #21's medical record revealed an admission date of 11/04/25, re-entry date of 01/01/26 and diagnoses including chronic kidney disease stage five hydronephrosis, carrier or suspected carrier of methicillin susceptible staphylococcus aureus, urinary tract infection, bacteremia, benign prostatic hyperplasia, obstruction and reflux uropathy, retention of urine and hypotension. Review of Resident #21's admission minimum data set (MDS) dated [DATE] revealed a brief interview for mental status score (BIMS) of 15 indicating the resident had intact cognition. Further review of the MDS revealed Resident #21 had no behaviors during the assessment look back period, required supervision or touching assistance with showering/bathing and was independent with all other activities for daily living, had an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
  Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, and staff interview, this facility failed to ensure meal intakes were being monitored to ensure residents highest nutritional status. This affected one (Resident #84) of the one resident reviewed for nutrition. The facility census was 84. Findings include:Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 05/09/2023. Diagnoses included dementia, end stage renal failure, and osteoporosis. Review of the plan of care dated 11/02/2023 revealed Resident #84 was at risk for malnutrition related to end stage renal disease. Resident continues to refuse nutritional supplements. Interventions include to provide and serve diet as ordered, monitor and record intakes for every meal, and alert dietician if consumption is poor for more than 48 hours. Review of the plan of care dated 12/22/2025 revealed Resident #84 has renal insufficiency related to end stage renal disease. Interventions include to consult with dietary to regulate protein, sodium, and potassium intake.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2026-01-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
  Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, staff interview, and dialysis communication documents, this facility failed to ensure orders and recommendations for residents receiving dialysis services were followed. This affected one (Resident #84) of the one resident reviewed for dialysis. The facility census was 84. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #84 revealed an admission date of 05/09/2023. Diagnoses included end stage renal disease, dependence on renal dialysis, and hypertension. Review of the plan of care dated 05/10/23 revealed Resident #84 was at risk for bleeding internally or externally related to medication. Interventions included to administer medication as ordered, contact primary care physician immediately if coffee ground emesis is observed, monitor for signs and/or symptoms of bleeding, monitor vital signs, and labs. Review of the plan of care dated 05/10/25 revealed Resident #84 required dialysis treatments related to end stage renal disease. Interventions include to administer…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2024-09-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, review of a video recording from an in-room camera, family interview, staff interview, and policy review, the facility failed to honor a resident's known preference on not having a male caregiver assist her with personal care. This affected one (#73) of three residents reviewed for choices/personal preference. The facility census was 71. Findings include: Review of Resident #73's medical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. She remained in the facility until 08/27/24, when she was transferred to another nursing facility at the request of the resident and her family. Her diagnoses included schizophrenia, depression, obesity, congestive heart failure, muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, abnormalities of gait and mobility, and repeated falls. Review of Resident #73's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident had clear speech and adequate hearing. She was usually able to make herself understood and was usually able to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$129,229 in federal fines across 2 penalties.

• $91,074 — penalty dated 2026-01-29
• $38,155 — penalty dated 2025-07-22

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 20 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

7 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $460K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH