Riverview

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

57.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 250 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 77.3% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 88 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.43 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 73% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 16% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 145 beds and averages 119.5 residents a day — about 82% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.66 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.85 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.14 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.39 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.77 on weekdays — 10% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.82 to 0.92 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 42% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

33 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 21 are one tap away and print in full.

• Immediate jeopardy · Lcited before2025-02-06 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on medical record review, review of hospital records, observation, staff interviews, interview with the Local County Health Department (LCHD), interview with the physician, review of a death certificate, review of the facility's Legionella bacteria prevention plan, review of email communications with the LCHD, review of facility policy and procedures, review of the Legionella risk assessment, and review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) website, the facility failed to follow their water management plan to ensure all shower heads were descaled semi-annually and flushes were completed weekly which resulted in elevated risk levels of Legionella bacteria in the facility's water system and exposure to the residents. This resulted in Immediate Jeopardy and the potential for serious life-threatening harm, negative health outcomes, and/or death when on [DATE] one resident (#100) was found to have increased effort of breathing, fatigue and generalized weakness, was sent to the emergency room…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Actual harm · Gcited before2024-02-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review, staff interviews, review of wound notes, and facility policy review, the facility failed to accurately assess, timely notify the physician of an identified pressure area, and implement interventions to prevent a middle lumbar pressure ulcer from worsening for Resident #16. Additionally, the facility failed to comprehensively assess, notify the physician, and implement a treatment plan timely for Resident #9 and Resident #67 who were admitted to the facility with pressure ulcers/injuries. Actual Harm occurred on 10/22/23 when Resident #16, who required extensive assistance from two staff and was incontinent, had a middle lumbar wound that was not accurately assessed as a Stage II (Partial thickness loss of dermis presenting as a shallow open ulcer with a red-pink wound bed, without slough or bruising. May also present as an intact or open/ ruptured blister.) pressure ulcer which worsened to an unstageable (dead or devitalized tissue that is hard or soft in texture; usually…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that medications were stored securely. This had the potential to affect 74 residents, #1, #2, #3, #4, #7, #8, #10, #12, #13, #14, #15, #17, #20, #25, #28, #29, #32, #33, #34, #36, #37, #40, #41, #42, #43, #44, #45, #50, #51, #52, #58, #61, #62, #76, #77, #78, #79, #84, #85, #86, #88, #89, #90, #92, #93, #94, #95, #102, #103, #104, #107, #110, #112, #116, #117, #120, #121, #122, #138, #175, #178, #179, #180, #226, #227, #229, #231, and #232 The facility also failed to ensure that medications, including three cups containing various types of pills, were stored appropriately. The facility census was 120. Findings include: 1. Continuous observation on 04/30/25 from 8:44 A.M. until 8:47 A.M. revealed an unattended and unlocked medication cart on Unit #4. Registered Nurse (RN) #201 exited a room across the hall and to the left of the unlocked medication cart at 8:47 A.M. and returned to the medication cart. Interview with RN #201 on 04/30/25 at 8:47 A.M. confirmed that she had left the…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
  Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observations, resident interview, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to provide food and drink at a palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature. This affected one resident (Resident #75) and had the potential to affect all 65 of the residents on units #2 and #4 except for Resident #68 and Resident #114, who did not eat or drink food from the kitchen. The facility census was 120 residents. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record for Resident #75 revealed an admission date of 12/24/20. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and generalized anxiety disorder. Review of the quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #75, dated 04/11/25, revealed that her short term and long term memories were assessed as being okay. Review of physician orders for Resident #75 dated 08/23/24 revealed the resident was on a regular diet with regular textures. Review of the plan of care dated 04/11/24 for Resident #75 revealed that she was at risk for…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-01 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to distribute and serve food under sanitary conditions. This had the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility who receive food from the kitchen except for residents #68 and #114 who did not eat or drink food from the kitchen. The census was 120. Findings include: Observation and tour on 04/28/25 from 9:30 A.M. to 10:00 A.M of the kitchen with Regional Dietary Manager #400 and Dietary Manager (DM) #216 revealed the following: -One large empty plate warmer unit sitting in the service line area revealed the spring loaded plate dispenser was covered with orange and black particles and dust like substance. When wiped with a white paper towel the brown orange colored substance could be wiped off and what appeared to be rusted areas remained, and unable to be removed. The observation was confirmed by DM #216. -One full dome cover dispenser, sitting in the service line area next to the plate warmer revealed multiple food crumbs, dried food and dried liquid marks on both the inside and outside of…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
  Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, staff interview, review of the Electronic Information Dissemination and Collection (EIDC) system, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin to the State Survey Agency (SSA). This affected one resident (Resident #7) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/17/2011. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side, chronic kidney disease (CKD), epilepsy, chronic atrial fibrillation, mild cognitive impairment, and chronic pulmonary embolism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/12/25, revealed Resident #7's cognition was unable to be assessed due to the resident being rarely/never understood. Further review revealed Resident #7 had impaired range of motion (ROM) on one side, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and lower body dressing, and required…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
  Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, resident interview, staff interview and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an injury of unknown origin. This affected one (#7) of two residents reviewed for abuse. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Review of Resident #7's medical record revealed an admission date of 01/17/2011. Diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (stroke) affecting the left non-dominant side, chronic kidney disease (CKD), epilepsy, chronic atrial fibrillation, mild cognitive impairment, and chronic pulmonary embolism. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/12/25, revealed Resident #7's cognition was unable to be assessed due to the resident being rarely/never understood. Further review revealed Resident #7 had impaired range of motion (ROM) on one side, utilized a wheelchair for mobility, was dependent on staff for personal hygiene and lower body dressing, and required substantial/maximum staff assistance for upper body dressing. Review of the plan of care, revised…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
  Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, staff interview, and policy review the facility failed to ensure residents receive care consistent with professional standards of practice when they failed to timely transcribe a new physician order for a pressure ulcer dressing change for Resident #105. This affected one (Resident #105) of four Residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Record review of Resident #105 revealed an admission date of 11/08/24 with pertinent diagnoses of: sepsis, aphasia, type one diabetes mellitus, encephalopathy, cerebral infarction, chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia, hypertension, altered mental status, and personal history of other venous thrombosis and embolism. Review of the 02/17/25 quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS) revealed Resident #105 is rarely or never understood and currently has a pressure ulcer. Review of the 04/23/25 wound assessment and care plan revealed the wound doctor came in and saw Resident #105 on the weekly wound rounds and wrote to change the order. The new order for left ischial tuberosity was to cleanse…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-05-01 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
  Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, interviews, and facility policy review, the facility failed to timely respond to monthly medication regimen reviews (MRR) for two Residents (#51 and #76) out of five residents (#10, #51, #57, #76 and #89) reviewed for unnecessary medications. The facility census was 120. Findings include: 1. Review of the medical record revealed Resident #51 was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, pneumonia, insomnia, bipolar and hypoxia. Review of the annual Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed Resident #51 was severely cognitively impaired. Required one person assistance with activities of daily living and transport with a wheelchair. Review of the medication administration record (MAR) for November 2024 and December 2024 revealed Resident # 51 was receiving Trazadone 50 milligrams (mg) at bedtime. Review of the monthly medication regimen reviews revealed on 11/29/24 the pharmacist documented Resident #51 had been using Trazadone 50 mg at…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, interview and policy review, the facility failed to ensure accurate physician order reconciliation was conducted following a hospital admission for one (Resident #82) of two residents reviewed for hospitalizations. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 10/12/23 with diagnoses of end-stage renal disease, type II diabetes mellitus, occlusion and stenosis of an unspecified carotid artery, hypotension, and diastolic heart failure. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) 3.0 assessment, dated 04/04/25, revealed Resident #82 was cognitively intact and received dialysis. Review of the care plan dated 11/13/23 revealed Resident #82 had altered cardiovascular status related to atrial fibrillation, cerebrovascular accident (stroke), chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypotension, chronic heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease. Review of physician orders dated 11/27/24 revealed Resident #82 had an order for midodrine five milligram (mg) oral tablet every 12 hours as needed for low blood…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-01 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on record review, observation, staff interview, and review of facility policy, the facility failed to ensure hand hygiene was performed prior to medication administration and failed to ensure proper sanitary practices were followed when preparing medications for administration. This failure affected one resident (Resident #82) out of the six residents observed during medication administration. The facility census was 120. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #82 revealed an admission date of 02/17/25, with diagnoses including dysphagia, squamous cell carcinoma, and malignant neoplasm of the head, face, and neck. Review of the current physician orders identified the following medications were prescribed on 02/18/25: folic acid, 1 milligram (mg) tablet by mouth once a day, one multivitamin tablet by mouth, once daily, thiamine mononitrate 100 mg by mouth once daily, and Fluticasone propionate nasal suspension, 50 micrograms per activation twice daily. Observation of medication administration on 04/30/25 at 9:22 A.M. with Registered Nurse (RN) #201 revealed…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-03-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
  Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on medical record review, observation, staff interview, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure resident dignity was maintained during medication administration. This affected one (Resident #93) of nine residents observed for dining. The facility census was 136 residents. Findings include: Review of the medical record for Resident #93 revealed an admission date of 11/27/24 with diagnoses including type two diabetes mellitus, dementia without behavioral disturbance, and anxiety. Review of the physician's orders for Resident #93 revealed an order dated 12/16/24 for Lispro insulin inject subcutaneously before meals for diabetes mellitus per sliding scale. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for Resident #93 dated 01/16/25 revealed the resident was cognitively impaired. Observation of the lunch meal in the main dining room on 03/10/25 at 12:14 P.M. revealed Registered Nurse (RN) #164 checked Resident #93's blood sugar while the resident was eating lunch and without asking for the resident's consent. RN #93 then left the dining room and returned…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

$168,656 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.

• $168,656 — penalty dated 2025-02-06
• Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-03-08 for 36 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 21 rows in the source record cover these 17 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $693K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in OH