Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Canton
7025 Lilley Road, Canton, MI 48187 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (734) 394-3100 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Apr 2026
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (73) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $140,322 in federal fines (most recent 2025-08-18)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (73%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 2 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 4 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 9.3% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 16.8% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.7% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.0% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 15.8% | 12.0% | 16.1% | typical |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 16.7% | 19.4% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 97.7% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 4.7% | 5.1% | 4.7% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 16.9% | 20.0% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 7.7% | 14.8% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 1.1% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.6% | 79.5% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 28.5% | 24.0% | 22.6% | worse |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 8.5% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 2.76 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.73 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 571 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 73.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 174 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.69 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 92% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 20% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.5%CMS range 46.5–54.0 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.9%CMS range 9.8–14.4 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 73.6% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 59.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 63.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 1.8% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.7% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.7%CMS range 4.3–8.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.97 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 99.5 residents a day — about 66% occupied, or roughly 50 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.44 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.69 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.68 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.91 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.66 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.81 to 0.38 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 73% is well above the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
73 citations, most serious first. The 14 most serious are shown; the remaining 59 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-08-18 · tag F0678 — failed to provide CPR when needed — isolatedProvide basic life support, including CPR, prior to the arrival of emergency medical personnel , subject to physician orders and the resident’s advance directives.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) for one resident (R108-with full code status by default on [DATE]) of one resident reviewed for CPR. R108 was found unresponsive with absent vital signs and CPR was not initiated.Findings include: On [DATE], when (R108) was found unresponsive without vital signs, the facility called a code and called 911. However, the facility did not initiate CPR because they executed an invalid Do Not Resuscitate (DNR) order. This deficient practice may result in the likelihood of other residents not receiving CPR according to code status resulting in serious harm, serious impairment, or death.The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on [DATE] and the immediacy was removed [DATE] per review of the facility's responding interventions as verified on [DATE]. The IJ was identified on [DATE] during a recertification survey. The facility was notified of the IJ on [DATE] at 4:50 PM and was asked for a removal plan. The surveyor…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes #2786224 and 2965279.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to utilize a two-person assist and appropriate bed mobility techniques during a brief change of one resident (R511) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in the resident sustaining a closed head injury, abdominal hematoma, and a closed fracture of the femur requiring hospitalization.Findings include:On 4/15/2026 at 08:08 AM, the complainant, Family Member J was interviewed and queried about R511's fall. Family Member J said, On February 7th (2026), I receive a call from the facility that (R511) fell out of bed while staff were changing the (incontinence brief).(R511) was sent to the hospital with a broken leg. A review of R511's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Chronic Kidney Disease, Legally Blind, Atherosclerotic Heart Disease, Heart Failure, Spinal Stenosis (narrowing of spaces in the spine, causing nerve compression…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake 2723333.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (R905) from the right to be free from verbal abuse and neglect by Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) A, out of five residents reviewed for abuse. This failure resulted in R905 experiencing degradation, humiliation, and episodes of tearfulness when retelling the incident.Findings include: An interview was conducted with R905 on 2/11/26 at 2:20 PM regarding an incident that occurred on 12/20/25 involving Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) A. During the interview, R905 was observed and became tearful while describing the event. R905 said CNA A initially entered the room, placed a brief in the room, and was aware the resident was wet and required assistance but did not provide care until approximately one hour later. When CNA A returned, R905 requested a clean gown and flat sheet due to being wet with urine. R905 reported CNA A began yelling, stating the resident should have requested…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient Practice #1: Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement appropriate safety interventions for one resident (R71) out of eight residents reviewed for accidents, resulting in a fall with injury (femoral fracture), and an emergency hospital encounter. Findings include: During an interview on 5/3/2023 at 9:31 AM, a concerned family member of Resident #71 (R71) stated, R71 fell in his room right in front of me. He fell hard and went to the hospital for surgery. A review of the admission Record for R71 revealed an admission date of 10/10/2022 and readmission date of 1/23/2023 with diagnoses that included right femur (thigh bone) fracture. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] and 5/1/2023 documented severe cognitive impairment. The MDS of 1/13/2023 documented no impairment of lower extremity and supervision with one-person physical assistance for transfer. The MDS of 5/1/2023 documented lower extremity impairment on one side and very…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to (1) ensure the use of personal protective equipment when providing care for residents on Enhanced Barrier Precautions and (2) failed to continuously maintain, implement and operationalize a comprehensive infection control program, encompassing outcome and process surveillance, accurate data collection/documentation/analysis, resulting in missed opportunities to prevent the spread of infection.Findings include:On 4/15/2026, at 6:28 AM Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) B was observed changing R519 incontinent brief without wearing proper personal protective equipment (PPE) despite R519 being on Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) for a stage III pressure ulcer to the sacrum/ coccyx area. CNA B did not wear a gown when performing hygiene care. CNA B was observed changing gloves after performing hygiene care. CNA B did not use sanitizer or soap and water to wash hands before applying new gloves. After performing hygiene care to R519 CNA B applied new gloves and moved to R520 and started hygiene care. On 4/15/2026 at 6:37…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2026-04-17 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — widespreadImplement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to maintain a continuous Antibiotic Stewardship Program that includes monitoring antibiotic usage, tracking resistance, prevent emergence of resistance, and following protocols for antibiotic use, which has the potential to affects all residents residing in the facility.Findings include:A review of the facility's policy Antibiotic Stewardship dated 02/04/2026, revealed the following: Facility staff and medical practitioners have a responsibility to assure that antibiotics are requested and provided only when the root cause is determined to be a bacterial infection and only for the length of time needed to adequately treat the infection.The overall goals of antibiotic stewardship is to:o Improve appropriate utilization of antibiotic therapy.o Reduce resistance to antibiotic therapy.o Reduce adverse drug events related to antibiotic therapy (including allergic rash, anaphylaxis, death, C. difficile, colonization, disruption of normal flora and the development of resistant organisms).o Reduce administration of unnecessary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-04-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to intake #2962412.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from neglect for one resident (R504) of three residents reviewed for neglect, resulting in the resident calling three times to the local police/ fire departments for allegations of neglect of care by the nursing staff.Findings include: On 4/15/26 at 3:00 A.M. an onsite investigation was initiated concerning the allegations of neglect for R504.On 4/15/26 at 4:30 A.M. R504 was observed in bed sleeping. R504 was easily aroused and after introductions indicated the next day would be best for further discussions related to no response to call lights. The resident continued to talk and pointed to a chair in the hallway stating, you see that chair outside in the hall staff sit there and sleep and talk on their phones all night. Staff do not respond to our call lights at the front desk or at the nursing station. R504 continued to express his concern in an agitated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolatedHonor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to intake #2962412.Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to adequately address and resolve grievances in a timely manner for one (R504) of four residents reviewed for grievances, resulting in neglect related to care by nursing staff.Findings include:On 4/15/26 at 4:30 A.M. R504 was observed in bed sleeping. R504 was easily aroused and after introductions indicated the next day would be best for further discussions related to no response to call lights. The resident went on and stated you see that chair outside in the hall staff sit there and sleep and talk on their phones all night. Staff do not respond to our calls to the desk or nursing station.During an interview on 4/16/26 at 10:00 A.M. R504 reported on 3/15/26 lying in a soiled diaper for approximately four hours requesting assistance from staff around 20:30 hours (8:30 P.M.). At 22:55 hours (10:55 P.M) R504 called 911 for assistance in which the police department responded leading to no change in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to intake #2962412.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to develop and revise a comprehensive Care plan for one resident (R504) of 14 residents reviewed for care plans, resulting in the potential for unmet care and services.Findings include:On 4/16/26 at 8:45 A.M. review of the Electronic Health Record indicated R504 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: progressive multiple sclerosis, calculus in the bladder, anxiety disorder, neuromuscular dysfunction of the bladder, adjustment disorder, major depressive disorder, adjustment insomnia and protein calorie malnutrition.According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R504 was moderately impaired in cognition (ability to think) and was totally dependent on staff to provide all Activities of Daily Living. (ADL's). On 4/16/26 at 8:50 A.M, review of the Care Plan Report initiated 8/4/2025 Titled: AT risk for changes in behavior and mood related to anxiety, MDD, with a Goal: R504 will…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to 2980193, 2981179, 2966122, 2962412, 2962938, 2795382, 2794223, 2797203 and 2791414Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate urinary incontinence care for two residents (R519 and R520) of 14 residents reviewed, resulting in the potential to cause skin breakdown, discomfort and poor moisture management. Findings Include:On 4/15/2026 at 5:18 AM, a strong smell of urine was noted to come from the room of R519 and R520. At that time, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) C was interviewed regarding the smell of urine. LPN C said they did notice a smell and the room floor was sticky.At 5:43 AM Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) B took a white incontinence brief and towels in the room of R519 and R520. CNA B left the items and exited the room. At 5:58 AM (CNA) B returned to the room and asked R519 about performing incontinence care. CNA B exited the room.At 6:28 AM (CNA) B was observed to perform incontinence care on R519. While performing incontinence on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2980193 and 2962412Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that one resident (R519) with a stage III pressure injury received necessary treatment and services to promote healing of six reviewed for wound care.Findings include: At 5:43 AM Certified Nurse Aid (CNA) B took a white incontinence brief and towels in the room of R519. CNA B left the items and exited the room. At 5:58 AM (CNA) B returned to the room and asked R519 about performing incontinence care. CNA B exited the room.At 6:28 AM (CNA) B was observed to perform incontinence care on R519. While performing incontinence on R519 it was observed to have on two incontinence briefs. R519 had on a white incontinence brief with a green brief on the inside.4/15/2026 at 6:28 AM CNA B was interviewed about R519 having on two incontinence briefs. CNA B said they did not consider that double briefing because the brief that was placed on the inside was not closed.On 4/16/2026 at 9:14 AM,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolatedEnsure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2786224 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure training, evidence of skills performed, and confirmed Certified Nurse Assistants (CNAs) were capable of delivering safe care to vulnerable residents, resulting in one resident (R511) of three residents reviewed for falls, resulting in R511 sustaining a closed head injury, abdominal hematoma, and a closed fracture of the femur, requiring hospitalization. This has the potential to affect all residents Findings include: On 4/15/2026 at 08:08 AM, the complainant, Family Member J was interviewed and queried about R511's fall. Family Member J said, On February 7th (2026), I receive a call from the facility that (R511) fell out of bed while staff were changing the (incontinence brief).(R511) was sent to the hospital due to a broken leg. A review of R511's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed an admission to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Legally Blind, Atherosclerotic Heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-04-17 · tag F0835 — failed to run the facility competently — isolatedAdminister the facility in a manner that enables it to use its resources effectively and efficiently.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure operational, systemic systems were maintained to ensure the highest, practicable, physical, mental and psychosocial well-being of each resident, resulting in multiple complaints related to Quality of Care and Quality of Life in the facility. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all residents residing in the facility.Findings include:During the abbreviated survey conducted April 15, 2026, at approximately 3:30 A.M. multiple deficiencies were identified and are presented as follows:The facility failed to provide adequate supervision, transfer assistance and interventions to prevent a resident fall resulting in a fracture and hospitalization.There was no system or individual to consistently monitor, assess and coordinate the competency and skill level of Agency staff and nursing personnel of the facility from September 2025 through April 2026.There was no consistent Infection Control Program resulting in missed opportunities to prevent the spread of infections from September 2025 through…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2785066.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of an injury of unknown origin for one (R603) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: The State Agency (SA) received a complaint that R603 had an injury of unknown origin to their lip. According to R603's Electronic Health Record (EHR) R603 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included history of a stroke with residual right-sided hemiparesis (partial paralysis) and aphasia (impaired ability to speak, understand, read, and write). The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] indicated R603 had a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 00/15 due to R603 being rarely understood, declining to answer, or could not complete the BIMS. On 2/23/26 at 4:28 PM a progress note written by Social Worker (SW) I documented R603's family member called to report they were upset regarding care issues over the past weekend. The Nursing Home…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 59 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-12 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2785066.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow physician orders for one (R603) of three residents reviewed for standards of practices resulting in R603 not having a urinalysis collected in a timely manner.Findings include:The State Agency received a complaint that the facility did not follow the physician's order to collect a urinalysis in a timely manner. According to the Electronic Health Record (EHR) R603 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnoses that included history of Urinary Tract Infection (UTI). On 2/5/26 the Nurse Practitioner (NP) B ordered R603 to have a urinalysis (UA) with culture and sensitivity (C&S) sent to the lab for complaints of abdominal pain and history of recurrent UTI. On 2/6/26, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E documented that R603 had refused straight catheterization (tube inserted through urethra into the bladder to drain urine, then immediately removed) and a urine sample could not be obtained. There was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2724140 and 2718825.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to adequately document, monitor and access one resident (R901) out of three residents reviewed for wound care, resulting in the potential for delayed treatment and worsening of R901's frost-bitten feet.Findings include:Record review revealed R901 was admitted into the facility on 1/9/26 with a pertinent diagnosis of pain in right and left foot and frost bite of feet.Record review of R901's Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 1/10/26, R901 scored 15/15 reflecting intact cognition.A phone interview was conducted with Family Member (FM) B on 2/11/26 at 12:20 PM, it was reported the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with bandages on both feet. It was further reported that during a visit on 1/10/26, R901's nurse was reminded by the FM B that the resident's bandages had not been changed. On a return visit on 1/11/26 in the morning, when R901's feet were inspected, both feet were still…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to 2663449 and 2668212. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident-to-resident verbal and physical abuse did not occur for two residents (R104 and R105), resulting in verbal and physical abuse. Findings include:Allegations of resident-to-resident abuse were reported to the State Agency. A review of the facility's investigation summary of a resident-to-resident incident between R104 and R105 documented in part the following: On October 11, 2025 at approximately 8:45 PM, R104 and R105 were involved in a physical altercation on the Cherry Hill unit. According to witness statements from staff and other resident, R104 was walking down the hallway returning to her room. R104 began using unprovoked profanity towards the nurse. At that time, R105 had just returned to her room from downstairs. R105 told R104 to be quiet and go back into her room. R104 said to R105, don't tell me what to do. R104 included profanity in her response. R105 said, what did you say? R104…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2650924, 2663449, and 2668212.Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement policies and procedures for ensuring proper reporting of abuse to the State Agency for four residents (R102, R103, R104, R105) out of eight resident reviewed for abuse, resulting in the likelihood of further abuse and subsequent physical or psychological distress. Findings include:A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) dated 10/6/2025 documented the following: R102 and R103. On 10/6/2025 at 3:00 p.m. the Administrator /Abuse Coordinator was notified by Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A that on October 2, 2025, R103 was heard swearing at the roommate R102. LPN A stated that the R103 was irritated and using abusive language with the roommate R102. The FRI continued and the Incident Summary documented: This was brought to the writer's (The Administrator/Abuse Coordinator) attention on today (10/6/2025) however the incident occurred on 10/2/1025. The (R103) as temporarily…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure showers for (R104) and grooming (R111) were provided per resident's preference resulting in unmet care needs and resident dissatisfaction. Findings include:R104A review of the clinical record documented R104 was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R104's diagnoses included cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, and bipolar disorder. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented intact cognition. A review of R104's care plans documented in part the following: ADL (activity of daily living) self-care deficit related to muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet, behaviors. Date initiated: 5/19/25. Intervention: Assist to bathe/shower as preferred per shower schedule and as needed. Date initiated: 5/20/25. On 11/24/25 at 2:16 PM, Concerned Family Member (CFM) F said R104 had not been getting regular showers. On 11/25/25 at 12:15 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse/Unit Manager (LPN/UM) I said staff are to complete shower sheets…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to 2598018. Based on observations interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement intervention to prevent falls in a timely manner for one resident (R101). Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that the resident has fallen out of the bed and staff are not always ensuring the resident's bed was kept in a low position. On 11/24/25 at 2:51 PM, R101 was observed awake and lying in bed. The top of the mattress on R101's bed was approximately 24 inches from the floor. R101 said he fell out of bed a couple of months ago and that his left side, arms and legs got a little worse after the fall. On 11/25/25 at 3:37 PM, staff were observed putting R101 in bed. The bed was elevated. On 11/25/25 at 3:40 PM, R101 was observed in bed. The top of the mattress on R101's bed was approximately 20 inches from the floor. A review of the clinical record for R101 documented an admission date of 6/24/25 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-01 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to 2598018. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure nutritional supplement administration and hospital transfer documentation were accurately documented for two residents (R101and R104) and failed to ensure a complete medical record that documented a resident-to-resident altercation for one resident (R104), resulting in the potential for staff and providers lacking accurate information to care for residents. Findings include:R101A review of the clinical record for R101 documented an admission date of 6/24/25 with diagnoses that included hemiplegia/hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, vascular dementia, aphasia, and gastrostomy status. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented intact cognition. R101's diet prescription included a regular diet, soft bite size pieces and a house supplement with meals. Physician orders included administering one can of high-calorie, fiber-fortified liquid supplement if R101 consumed less than…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food contact and non-food contact surfaces were adequately cleaned and sanitized. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the kitchen, resulting in the increased potential for food borne illness. Findings include: The following was observed during the initial tour of the kitchen on 8/11/25 at 8:15 AM with Dietary Manager A- The rubber bumper at the base of the reach-in juice cooler was visibly soiled with dust and food stains.- The front drip tray of the commercial ice dispenser was stained with food debris. DM A said the ice machine was not clean. Food debris (collard greens) observed on the inside base of the drip tray was easily removed by DM A. - A full fruit cup, an empty plastic cup, a plastic cup lid, loose paper, and food debris was observed on the floor behind the ice dispenser and reach-in cooler.- Four ladles, hanging from a rack, were stored bowl side up. Each ladle was stained with dried food debris. DM A indicated they needed to be cleaned.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-18 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose of rubbish and maintain cleanliness of the outside garbage area, resulting in a visually unappealing property and the potential for harborage of pests. Findings include: Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly dispose of rubbish and maintain cleanliness of the outside garbage area, resulting in a visually unappealing property and the potential for harborage of pests.Findings include:On 8/13/25 at 11:16 AM, the outside dumpster area was observed with Dietary Manager (DM) A. Three dumpsters were in this area. The half lid on dumpster one was flipped open. Dumpster two was pushed up against dumpster three which prevented the lid on dumpster three from closing. Trash and debris of various types and mounds of decaying leaves were piled up behind the dumpsters. A lid from a 55-gallon trash can was wedged underneath dumpster three. The lid of a 55-gallon trash was not fully closed. A pool of standing water was observed on the lid of a large gray square…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-08-18 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespreadKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent proper working order of the handwashing sink faucet, commercial ice dispenser, and walk-in freezer which had the potential to affect all residents that eat from the kitchen. Findings include:During the initial tour of the kitchen on 8/11/25 at 8:15 AM with Dietary Manager (DM) A the following was observed, the faucet for the handwashing sink did not shut off completely, dripping water was observed coming from the commercial ice dispenser drainage pipe, and the internal temperature of the walk-in freezer was observed to be 12 F (Fahrenheit). A four-ounce cup of ice cream stored in the freezer was observed soft, not frozen solid. The AM recorded temperature on the freezer temperature log for 8/11/25 was 8 F. DM A said he will contact maintenance.During an interview on 8/11/25 at 10:23 AM, Maintenance Director (MD) B said he was unaware of any current leaks in the kitchen. MD B said he fixed a leaky drainpipe on the handwashing sink in the kitchen a while ago but did not know the handwashing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0552 — isolatedEnsure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain consent for psychotropic medications (drugs that affect behavior, mood, thoughts, or perception) use for two residents (R2, R4) out of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. Findings include: R2 Record review of R2's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed admission to the facility on 6/11/25 with diagnoses which included aftercare following Joint Replacement Surgery, Major Depressive Disorder, and Neurocognitive Disorder with Lewy Bodies (dementia). Review of R2's Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment performed on 7/7/25 revealed a BIMS of 12/15 moderately impaired cognition. R2 had guardianship appointed on 12/13/24. Review of the physician orders revealed Trazadone and Citalopram Hydrobromide (antidepressants/psychotropic medications) were ordered on 6/12/25. Review of R2's care plan revealed At risk for adverse effects related to use of antidepressant medication. Date initiated 6/12/25. Review of the Psychiatric…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 1221139 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure security and accountability for 30 oxycodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg (milligram) tablets for one resident (R1) of three reviewed for drug diversion of controlled substances, resulting in 30 missing oxycodone-acetaminophen without resolution and a delay in pain relief.A review of the facility's incident report was received by the State Agency via online submission on: 6/23/25 revealed the following: Incident Summary On 6/22/25, the facility's routine narcotic count revealed a discrepancy involving (drug name, Oxycodone 10-325mg prescribed to resident R1. A total of 30 tablets were unaccounted for during the beginning of the day shift count.Upon further review of the narcotic sign-out sheet along with the blister pack of medication noted missing. Investigation initiated immediately by the Director of Nursing.Misappropriation of Controlled Substance (Narcotics) Time of Incident: 11:00a.m.The nurse notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 1221139 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report to law enforcement drug diversion of 30 Oxycodone tablets (controlled substances) for one resident (R1) of three residents reviewed for missing medications. Findings include: A review of the facility's incident report was received by the State Agency via online submission on: 6/23/25 revealed the following: Incident Summary On 6/22/25, the facility's routine narcotic count revealed a discrepancy involving (drug name, Oxycodone 10-325mg (milligram) prescribed to resident R1. A total of 30 tablets were unaccounted for during the beginning of the day shift count.Upon further review of the narcotic sign-out sheet along with the blister pack of medication noted missing. Investigation initiated immediately by the Director of Nursing (DON).Misappropriation of Controlled Substance (Narcotics) Time of Incident: 11:00a.m.The nurse notified the pharmacy to get a refill the pharmacy notified the nurse that the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-18 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 1221139 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the misappropriation of 30 oxycodone-acetaminophen 10-325 mg (milligram) tablets was thoroughly investigated for one resident (R1) of three reviewed for drug diversion of controlled substances, resulting in 30 missing oxycodone-acetaminophen without resolution and a delay in pain relief. The review of the incident report revealed the following: Incident Summary On 6/22/25, the facility's routine narcotic count revealed a discrepancy involving (drug name, Oxycodone 10-325mg prescribed) to resident (R1). A total of 30 tablets were unaccounted for during the beginning of the day shift count.Upon further review of the narcotic sign-out sheet along with the blister pack of medication noted missing. Investigation initiated immediately by the Director of Nursing.Misappropriation of Controlled Substance (Narcotics) Time of Incident: 11:00a.m.The nurse notified the pharmacy to get a refill the pharmacy notified…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0628 — isolatedProvide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate transfer documentation was in place for one resident (R6) out of one resident reviewed for hospital transfer, resulting in the lack of information regarding resident's health status, safety, and transfer arrangements upon transfer from the facility. Findings include: A review of the admission Record for R6 documented an initial admission date of 6/18/25 and readmission on [DATE]. R6 was discharged from the facility on 8/5/25. R6's diagnoses included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction, surgical aftercare following surgery on the nervous system, heart failure, aphasia following cerebral infarction, and adult failure to thrive. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented severe cognitive impairment.On 8/12/25 at 9:52 AM, Unit Manager/Licensed Practical Nurse (UM/LPN) F said R6 was not in the facility (at the time of this interview) because he went out for a procedure on 8/5/25. A review of a physician's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Pre-admission Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASARR - determines whether or not an individual who has a diagnosis of Mental Illness or Intellectual/Developmental Disability meets the criteria for a nursing home and their needs are met) Level I (3877) was completed for one resident (R4) out of two residents reviewed for PASARR screening. Findings include:A review of the clinical record for R4 documented an original admission date of 10/18/23 and readmission date of 4/23/24. R4's diagnoses included vascular dementia, delusional disorders, major depressive disorder, and psychotic disorder with delusions. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented severe cognitive impairment. The PASARR document available in R4's clinical record was dated 7/19/24. This PASARR document indicated in part the following, The recipient may be admitted to or remain in the nursing facility and receive mental health services. Further PASARR Level II…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure timely pain management for one resident (R120) out of five residents reviewed for pain management, resulting in a shortened therapy session and resident pain and discomfort. Findings include:On 8/12/25 at 10:25 AM R120 was observed sitting in her wheelchair in her room. R120 said earlier in the morning a physical therapist came and took her to therapy before she was able to receive her pain medication. R120 said she was in therapy for only about 10 minutes because she was in severe pain.On 8/12/25 at 10:30 AM Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) W said a therapist took R120 to therapy before pain medications could be administered. The therapist said they would bring her back in 40 minutes. LPN W said she prefers for R120 to get her meds before going to therapy.On 8/12/25 at 12:01 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) said that it was not okay that R120 received therapy before she received her pain medications. The DON said both parties, therapy and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide morning meals for two residents (R62, R91) who attended dialysis out of three residents sampled for dialysis services. Findings include:R62On 8/11/2025 at 11:17 AM R62 and R62's spouse were interviewed regarding dialysis services and R62 said she wasn't given breakfast before or after dialysis nor a snack to take with her this morning. R62's spouse said he usually brings in something for his wife to eat since the facility doesn't provide anything in the morning for her.Record review of R62's Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed admission to the facility on 7/17/25 with diagnoses which included End Stage Renal Disease, and Dependence on Renal Dialysis.Review of R62's Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) assessment performed on 8/1/25 revealed a BIMS of 11/15 moderately impaired cognition. Review of R62's physician orders revealed, Dialysis Treatment .Treatment days Mon, Wed, Fri pick up at 5:45 AM Ensure packed food if needed.Review of R62's care plan revealed, Focus The resident needs hemodialysis related to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-08-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper cleaning and disposal of loose medications were conducted per professional standards of practice for one medication cart (Cherry Hall Cart) of three medication carts observed for medication storage and cleanliness. Findings include On 08/12/2025 at 11:47AM, an observation and interview were conducted with Nurse M's Cherry Hall medication cart. Upon inspection of the medication cart, a total of 12 loose pills were scattered on the bottom of the second drawers. The loose pills varied in shapes, colors and sizes. In addition, the second drawer of the medication cart had a pack of cigarettes and dust.On 08/12/2025 at 11:55 AM, an interview was conducted with Nurse M regarding the loose pills, cigarettes and dust found in their medication cart (Cherry Hall). Nurse G said that the cart should be clean by dayshift and midnight nurses. On 08/12/2025 at 12:18 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing (DON) regarding the 12 loose pills, cigarettes and dust found in Cherry Hall medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-07-03 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the dignity of one (R402) of three residents reviewed for dignity and respect. Findings include: On 7/2/25 at 9:55 AM, R402 was observed sleeping at the [NAME] nurse's station. R402 was observed seated in a wheelchair with her head resting directly on the desk. Nurse Practitioner (NP) F was observed sitting in a different part of the nurse's station actively typing in a computer facing 90 degrees away from R402. No other staff were observed in the area. When NP F was queried regarding R402's positioning NP F said R402 was not her patient, but she had been helping keep her calm. On 7/2/25 at 10:00 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) G was observed passing medications down the 300 hallway. RN G confirmed R402 was under his care for the shift. R402 was not visible from RN G s location. On 7/2/25 at 10:05 AM, R402 was observed with RN G sleeping at the [NAME] nurses' station with her head resting directly on the desktop. When queried about…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered in accordance with professional standards of practice for one (R403) of four residents reviewed for medication administration resulting in inaccurate medication administration. Findings include: On 7/2/25 at 10:15 AM, R403 was observed walking out of his room holding a medication cup to his mouth with approximately four pills. R403 was observed alone without staff supervising medication administration. When asked what R403 was doing, R403 stated, I'm taking my pills. R403 dropped one pill on the floor, bent over picked up the pill, placed the pill back in the medication cup. R403 returned to his room where he swallowed the remaining pills from the medication cup. R403 was observed to have a PEG Tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube, a feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach, used for patients to take in nutrients. On 7/2/25 at 10:30 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medications were administered via the correct route via PEG Tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube, a feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach, used for patients who cannot eat normally) for one (R403) of four residents reviewed for medication administration resulting in the potential for silent aspiration (when food, liquid, or other materials are inhaled into the airway without the individual realizing it, potentially leading to serious health issues like aspiration pneumonia and even death). Findings include: On 7/2/25 at 10:15 AM, R403 was observed walking out of his room holding a medication cup to his mouth with approximately four whole pills. R403 was observed alone without staff supervising medication administration. When asked what R403 was doing, R403 stated, I'm taking my pills. R403 dropped one pill on the floor, bent over picked up the pill, placed the pill back in the medication…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-07-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medical records were accurate for one (R403) of six residents reviewed for accurate medical records. Findings include: On 7/2/25 at 10:15 AM, R403 was observed walking out of his room holding a medication cup to his mouth with approximately four whole pills. R403 was observed alone without staff supervising medication administration. When asked what R403 was doing, R403 stated, I'm taking my pills. R403 dropped one pill on the floor, bent over picked up the pill placed the pill back in the medication cup. R403 returned to his room where he swallowed the remaining pills from the medication cup. R403 was observed to have a PEG Tube (percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube, a feeding tube inserted through the abdominal wall into the stomach, used for patients who cannot eat normally). On 7/2/25 at 10:30 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A was interviewed and identified the following pills were given to R403 in a medication cup to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — widespreadHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI000149346. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility to provide shower linens (towels and washcloths) for two residents (R112 and R113) resulting in an unclean, uncomfortable environmental where residents went without shower linens and had to purchase and share personal items. This deficient practice affected all 107 residents residing in the facility. Review of an anonymous intake, dated 1/6/25, noted the following on 1/24/25, Complainant states for at least the past 2 weeks the facility has been without towels and washcloths for the residents. The complainant states staff have been instructed to cut up gowns to use to wash and dry residents. Complainant states they have a loved one at the facility and staff left feces on the resident after attempting to clean them up with a gown. On 2/11/2025 at 09:15 am, an observation of the linen closets on each unit revealed the following: -Cherry Hill- zero towels and zero washcloths -Medbridge- three towels and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-12 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00149294. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that private property was protected from theft by an employee for one resident (R102) of five reviewed for misappropriation of property, resulting in an employee's deliberate removal of R102's earbuds from possession. Findings include: A facility reported incident revealed the following, Facility investigation report received via online submission on: 12/27/24, 10:21 AM Incident Summary Resident [R102] who is with us [Facility]for short-term Rehab care reported to the DON [Director of Nursing] that [R102] left [their] room to go to activities and left [their] apple air pods [wireless earbuds] in [their] room. Upon resident [R102] return to [their] room they were nowhere to be found, and [R102] then activated an app to help [R102] locate them in switch they started to make a tracking noise. Where [R102] tracked to a housekeepers cleaning cart. Investigation Summary Date of Event: 12/23/2024 Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00149008 and MI00148990. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper transfer assistance for two residents (R102 and R103) out of four residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: R102 - It was reported to the State Agency that the facility failed to ensure proper transfer assistance. The complainant indicated that the resident fell to the floor while being transferred back into the bed and a nurse assistant and nurse were rough with the resident during the transfer from the floor into the bed. A review of the clinical record for R102 documented an admission into the facility on [DATE] and discharge on [DATE]. R102's diagnoses included ovarian cancer and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented intact cognition. Record review of R102's ADL (activity of daily living) self care deficit as evidence by weakness related to metastatic CA (cancer) care plan documented transfer with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the correct amount of TPN (total parenteral nutrition used to provide complete nutrition directly into the bloodstream) was administered for one resident (R102), out of three residents reviewed for altered methods of receiving required nutrients. Findings include: A review of the clinical record for R102 documented an admission into the facility on [DATE]. R102's diagnoses included ovarian cancer and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented intact cognition. Record review of R102's care plans documented resident was at nutritional risk related to diet restrictions, recent hospitalization, unplanned/unexpected weight loss, recurrent ovarian cancer, abdominopelvic abscess with blockage, history of nausea/vomiting, abnormal labs, history of multiple transfusions, gastrointestinal bleed, depression, severe protein-calorie malnutrition, fragile skin with drains, pedal edema, requires TPN,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently change the PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line tubing according to physician's order for one resident (R102) out of three residents reviewed for altered methods of feeding. (The parenteral method delivers nutrition intravenously which increases the risk of infection). Findings include: A review of the clinical record for R102 documented an admission into the facility on [DATE]. R102's diagnoses included ovarian cancer and severe protein-calorie malnutrition. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented intact cognition. Record review of R102's potential for complications at IV (intravenous line) insertion site. PICC inserted at upper right arm, care plan indicated to change IV tubing per physician orders, initiated 12/5/24. Physician's order documented to Change IV PICC line tubing daily every day shift for safety monitoring. Start date of 12/6/24. A review of R102's Skin assessment dated [DATE] documented in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-23 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00147516. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to inform a cognitively impaired resident's representative of a change in condition for one resident (R902) out of three residents reviewed for resident's rights, resulting in a missed opportunity for R902's representative to participate in medical decisions. Findings include: Record review of R902's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, pressure ulcers, and chronic kidney disease. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R902 was dependent with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Further review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 10/4/24, documented that R902 had scored 3 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment). R902's facesheet identifieda resident representative. Review of Skin and Wound Evaluation dated 10/7/24, indicated R902's pressure ulcer on coccyx had worsened and categorized to a Stage III- Full-…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-23 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00147516. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to identify a resident with dentures and implement adequate oral care for one resident (R902) out of three residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Findings include: Record review of R902's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed admission into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of dementia, pressure ulcers, and chronic kidney disease. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] documented that R902 was dependent with all Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Further review of a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) dated 10/4/24, documented that R902 had scored 3 out of 15 (severe cognitive impairment). Record review of facility admission Evaluation dated 10/4/24, it was documented under oral evaluation section that R902 did not have dentures. Review of R902's care plan revealed no interventions to remove and clean dentures. Review of R902's [NAME] (Information noted to perform…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00146875. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to follow a physician's order in a timely manner to insert an indwelling urinary catheter for one (R805) of three residents reviewed for quality of care resulting in the potential for the resident to develop a urinary tract infection. Findings include: The State Agency received a complaint that the facility failed to assess a resident (R805) for a change in condition in a timely manner resulting in the resident being hospitalized for Urinary Tract Infection in less than 24 hours after discharge from the facility. According to R805's Electronic Health Record (EHR) the resident admitted to the facilty on 8/7/24 with multiple diagnoses that included fractured left tibia (top shin bone), fractured left fibula (lateral/outer shin bone), fractured left foot, and fractured lower end of right femur (above knee). R805 had a history of urinary retention, obstructive and reflux uropathy. According to the Minimum Data Set…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-12 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes MI00144625 and MI0014484. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of residents' dependent upon staff for care needs. This deficient practice has the potential to affect all 72 residents that reside at the facility. On 7/9/24 at 9:52 a.m. during the Entrance Conference, it was confirmed the resident census was 72 (32 residents on the second floor; 40 residents on the first floor). On 7/09/24 at 10:46 a.m. during the initial pool process, the second floor had two nurses and two nurse aides to provide care for 32 residents. On 7/9/24 at 10:50 a.m. Unit Manager H said there is usually two nurse aides for 32 long term residents. Unit Manager H was not able to confirm the number of residents that required two-person assistance with care (transfers, bed mobility, showers, toileting). LPN T said there are three nurse aides at times but there are usually just two. LPN T did not respond to the inquiry of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2024-07-12 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (excluding the Director of Nursing) was on duty for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week; resulting in the potential for inadequate coordination of emergent or routine care that could cause negative outcomes. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all 72 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 7/12/24 9:46 a.m. review of the nurses' schedule for the month of June 2024, revealed there was no Registered Nurse (RN) coverage on June 1st through June 3rd (Saturday-Monday). On 7/12/24 at 10:32 a.m. during an interview with the Staffing Coordinator R who confirmed, on June 1st and 2nd there was no RN coverage, and the Director of Nursing came in to provide coverage. On June 3rd the RN that was scheduled to come in called off and the Director of Nursing had to come in to cover. On 7/12/24 at 11:05 a.m. The Director of Nursing was interviewed and confirmed there was no RN coverage for the dates of June 1st-3rd due to call offs and came in to provide coverage, I was later…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-12 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — patternHonor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide accurate and complete information for Advance Medical Directives (AMD), legal documents that allow a person to identify decisions about end-of-life care ahead of time, for eight residents (R12, R15, R16, R17, R19, R21, R40, and R55) of 12 residents reviewed for AMDs resulting in the resident or their Legal Guardian (LG) not being fully informed of how to formulate an AMD and their preferences for medical care not to be followed by the facility. Findings include: R12 According to R12's Electronic Health Record (EHR), the resident admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses that included history of a stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The EHR's header (top of page) indicated R12 was a full code. (All medical measures will be take to maintain and resuscitate life including Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation if the resident has no heartbeat and not breathing.) R12 had a Legal Guardian (LG) with valid paperwork and contact information…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure dignity was maintained for one resident (R21) of three residents reviewed for dignity, resulting in the resident expressing feelings of embarrassment and humiliation. Findings include: In an interview on 7/9/24 at 12:40 P.M., R21 explained that on Friday 6/21/24 he had been taken to physical therapy wet. R21 reported he told the PTA (Physical Therapy assistant) G he had an accident and his sheets and briefs needed to be changed. According to R21 PTA G did not assist or request staff assistance in changing the resident's brief, but did ask the two nurse aides at the desk to change the resident's linen on the bed before the resident returned to the unit. During the interview R21 began to cry uncontrollably stating he was taken to therapy and had to wear a wet brief for 45 minutes or more and he felt embarrassed and humiliated. The resident continued and repeatedly commented, I am a human being, well respected in my church and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide showers for one (R21) of five residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL'S), resulting in the resident not receiving scheduled showers. Findings include: In an interview on 7/9/24 at 12:40 P.M., R21 stated, he was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and for 2 and half weeks after admission had not received a shower. R21 stated he got so frustrated his wife came to the facility and gave him a shower because the staff was ignoring his requests for a shower. The resident was queried, if he told anyone about his showers, R21 responded yes, it was reported to the concierge (corporate liaison from outside who take concerns in the facility 2-3 times a week) and R21 did not receive the shower promised on that Saturday night. R21 indicated the staff continued to give me a bucket bath (meaning bed bath). Review of the admission Face Sheet indicated R21 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of: Heart…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation contains two Deficient Practice Statements. Deficient Practice Statement #1. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to effectively communicate and collaborate care with hospice staff for one resident (R28) reviewed for hospice services resulting in R28 not receiving an Alternating Pressure Relief Mattress (APM). Findings include On 7/10/24 at approximately 4:00 PM, R28's family member said the resident was supposed to receive a pressure relieving mattress (APM) from hospice for comfort care about a month ago and had not received it. R28 was observed in a bariatric sized bed (a wider bed) with a regular bariatric mattress in place, not an APM. It was noted that an APM was outside the resident's room, leaning against the wall. Review of R28's Electronic Health Record (EHR) indicated R28 had multiple diagnoses that included adult failure to thrive, dementia, and was receiving hospice services. A care plan for 'hospice' was initiated on 3/19/24 included the following…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0685 — isolatedAssist a resident in gaining access to vision and hearing services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to schedule an ophthalmologist (eye doctor) appointment for one resident (R12) reviewed for vision services resulting in R12 having delayed treatment for cataracts. Findings include: On 07/09/24 at 10:20 AM, R12 was observed laying in bed watching TV. R12 had several books, magazines, word search puzzles, and an IPad on his over-bed table. Upon inquiry R12 said, I like to read and play games on my IPad, but I can't see that well because I have cataracts. I've asked them several times to make me an eye doctor appointment, but nothing gets scheduled. According to R12's Electronic Health Record (EHR), the resident admitted to the facility with multiple diagnoses that included history of a stroke and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], indicated the resident had intact cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15. On 6/5/24, a progress note written by Nurse Practitioner (NP)…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-07-12 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label tube feeding (liquid nutrition provided by a tube to stomach) container and hydration flush bag for one resident (R60) out of two residents reviewed for nutrition, resulting in the potential for receiving the incorrect product and dosage. Findings include: During an observation on 7/9/24 at 10:19 AM in R60's room, a bottle of Glucerna (Liquid nutrition) was infusing as well as a hydration bag. The bottle of Glucerna was not labeled with the date started, resident's name or the physician's order for infusing. The hydration bag was not labeled with resident's name, date, order for flush or the contents of the bag. Record review of R60's electronic medical record (EMR) revealed resident was admitted into the facility on 6/19/24 with pertinent diagnosis of gastrostomy status (insertion of a tube feeding). According the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R60 had impaired cognition with a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) of 5/15.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-12 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that the facility responded to pharmacist Medication Regimen Review (MRR) recommendations timely for one resident (R8) of five residents reviewed for a medication regimen review, resulting in the potential for the continuance of unnecessary medications and lack of communication of recommended medication changes. Findings include: On 7/11/24 at 9:57 a.m. review of the clinical record documented R8 was initially admitted into the facility on 5/26/20 and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included major depressive disorder, heart failure, generalized anxiety disorder, and morbid obesity. According to the quarterly Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], R8 had intact cognition and required extensive two-person assistance with activities of daily living. Review of R8's physician orders documented the resident's current medications as follows: -Buspirone HCl Oral Tablet 15 MG (Buspirone HCl)- Give 1 tablet by mouth every 8 hours for Anxiety.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #144271 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to obtain blood glucose levels per physician orders effecting one resident (R901) out of three residents reviewed for change in condition, resulting in unmonitored blood glucose levels. Review of an admission Record revealed, R901 admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 4/30/24 with pertinent diagnosis which included Sepsis, Type 2 Diabetes, and Severe Sepsis with Septic Shock. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R901 had no cognitive impairment with a Brief interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14 out of 15 and required parenteral nutrition. Review of Physician orders revealed R901 had orders which included: Blood Sugar check two times a day for DM (diabetes mellitus) with a starte date of 4/14/24 and an end date of 5/3/24. TPN (Total Parenteral Nutrition) Electrolytes Intravenous Concentrate (Parenteral Electrolytes) use 75 ml/hr intravenously every 24 hours for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143275. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to report an allegation of abuse for one resident (R502) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of a facility investigation report for R502 revealed the following: Description of the incident: R502 alleged that someone around 8:00 AM, a heavy woman, tried to wake her up. R502 said, 'It felt like a bull laid on me.' Summary of the investigation: LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) A was providing care. Took (R502's) blood pressure and gave her two breathing treatments. Note, LPN A had to reach over to put facemask and apply breathing treatment. Timeline of Events per review of cameras. At 8:22 AM LPN A was seen with the blood pressure machine and entered resident room. At 8:25 AM LPN A came out of room and prepared medication. At 8:29 AM LPN A entered the resident room with medication and breathing treatment. A review of R502's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed R502 was admitted to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00143275. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to investigate an allegation of abuse for one resident (R502) of four residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include: A review of a facility investigation report for R502 revealed the following: Description of the incident: R502 alleged that someone around 8:00 AM, a heavy woman, tried to wake her up. R502 said, 'It felt like a bull laid on me.' Summary of the investigation: LPN (Licensed Practical Nurse) A was providing care. Took (R502's) blood pressure and gave her two breathing treatments. Note, LPN A had to reach over to put facemask and apply breathing treatment. Timeline of Event per review of cameras. At 8:22 AM LPN A was seen with the blood pressure machine and entered resident room. At 8:25 AM LPN A came out of room and prepared medication. At 8:29 AM LPN A entered the resident room with medication and breathing treatment. A review of R502's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed R502 was admitted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00141653. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer intravenous fluids ordered by physician for one resident (R303) out of three residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in R303 not receiving intravenous fluids as ordered by the physician. Findings include: Record review of electronic medical records (EMR) revealed R303 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with a primary diagnosis of muscle wasting and atrophy and aftercare following digestive surgery. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], R901 had intact cognition and was provided with partial to moderate assist with Activities of Daily Living (ADLS). Review of Progress Notes dated 11/13/23 at 7:38 PM noted: MD (Medical Doctor) in order IV (intravenous) access initiated for fluids. Sodium chloride to run at 100 cc (cubic centimeters) /hr. for 2 days. Orders processed waiting IV placement. Electronically signed by Register Nurse (RN) B. Review of Progress Notes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to MI00140483. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Cherry Hill shower room was maintained in a clean and sanitary manner, resulting in the potential to spread harmful pathogens and residents' environment not being clean and homelike. Findings include: It was reported to the Stage Agency that resident shower rooms were not clean. During an interview and observation of the Cherry Hill shower room on 12/11/23 at 12:31 PM with Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) H, used tissue paper, that appeared somewhat dry, was observed on top of a shower chair seat/commode, wedged underneath the seat/commode, and lying on the bottom front frame of the shower chair. CNA H said the tissue paper looked like it was stained with urine. CNA H stated, The shower chair should have been cleaned after use. On 12/12/23 at 12:52 PM, the Director of Nursing said that shower rooms should be cleaned up after use. A review of a facility policy titled, Showering, dated 2/1/03, revealed in part, Clean the shower room, leaving it in order and ready for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-12-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to MI00140483. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly clean resident refrigerators, date-label opened food, and remove expired/undated food from two resident refrigerators, resulting in the potential for food borne illness. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that the nourishment rooms were not cleaned. On 12/11/23 at 8:48 AM the Medbridge Nourishment Room was observed with Unit Manager Nurse (UM) C. The following was noted: - The rug in front of the ice machine was soiled and dirty. UM C stated, The rug needs to be vacuumed. - The soap dispenser near the handwashing sink was empty. - The outside of the resident refrigerator was soiled. UM C stated, It's very dirty. The inside of the refrigerator was soiled with a dried red fluid. UM C stated, It needs to be cleaned. - A 48 oz. container of cranberry juice cocktail was opened and undated in the resident refrigerator. - The following food items stored in the resident refrigerator were identified as belonging to a resident by UM C: 1. Two bags of an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake MI00139751. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a skin alteration care plan for one resident (R420) of five residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the potential for the resident to not receive the proper interventions/treatment. Findings include: A review of R420's EMR (Electronic Medical Record) revealed R420 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and discharged from the facility on 9/26/23. R40 had medical diagnoses that included: disorder of muscle, type 2 diabetes, and encephalopathy (disease that disrupts brain function causing confusion and altered mental status). A review of R420's MDS (Minimum Data Set) dated 9/18/23 revealed R420 had a BIMS (Brief Interview of Mental Status) score of 15/15 (cognitively intact). According to the MDS, R420 had the possibility of developing pressures but at the time of the MDS, R420 did not have any pressure ulcers. A review of R420's orders revealed the following orders: - Wound consult- right…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-12-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00136584, MI00138968, MI00140212, and MI00140483. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide showers according to resident's preference and/or on their scheduled shower days for three (R403, R416, and R426) of fifteen residents reviewed who were dependent on staff for performance of activities of daily living (ADLs), resulting in untimely and unmet care needs regarding personal hygiene. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that residents were not receiving regular showers. Resident #416 On 12/11/23 at 10:00 AM, a review of complaint intake related to Resident #416 (R416) documented resident was not showered in a timely manner. Record review of R416's face sheet revealed admitted to facility on 6/29/23 diagnoses included Covid-19, fall, diabetes mellitus type 2, Atrial fibrillation, hypertension, high cholesterol, psychotic disorder, congestive heart failure, and disorder of muscle. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] for R416…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-12-13 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to MI00140212. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently document the provision of meal assistance for one resident (R426), deemed to be at nutrition risk, out of eleven residents reviewed for food intake/feeding assistance, resulting in the potential for additional nutrition concerns to go undetected and compromise in nutritional status. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that facility staff failed to provide meal assistance for a resident. A review of the admission Record for Resident #426 (R426) documented an admission date of 9/16/23. R426 discharged from the facility on 10/31/23. R426's diagnoses included cancer of the vulva (external female genitals), lungs, bladder, and bone, moderate protein-calorie malnutrition, congestive heart failure, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and dementia. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented severe cognitive impairment. A MDS assessment dated [DATE] documented extensive one-person physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen, plumbing, and an accessible hand sink, resulting in the potential contamination of food and equipment, and potential for discouragement of hand hygiene, affecting all residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/02/23 at 10:29 AM, a dried spill and food splatter was observed in the dry storage room at the wall/floor juncture near the can shelf. An unknown substance was observed to have a solidified drip hanging from the wire rack at the same location. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code Section 6-501.12 Cleaning, Frequency and Restrictions. (A)PHYSICAL FACILITIES shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. (B)Except for cleaning that is necessary due to a spill or other accident, cleaning shall be done during periods when the least amount of FOOD is exposed such as after closing. On 5/02/23 at 10:31 AM, food debris and grease were observed to be accumulating in the top and bottom drawer of the three-tier drawer near the preparation sink, where…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to: 1. Ensure staff adhered to contact precautions during meal pass; 2. Ensure a meal cart was properly cleaned and sanitized for meal distribution to the residents; and, 3. Educate residents on the risks of sharing electronic cigarettes. These deficient practices resulted in the potential for the spread of harmful pathogens among the residents in the building. Findings include: - Isolation precautions and meal cart On 5/2/2023 at 12:21 PM, a meal tray was observed removed from the room of a resident on contact precautions (transmission-based measures implemented to a resident known or suspected to be infected with a microorganism that can be transmitted by direct contact with other residents or indirect contact with environmental surfaces) for Clostridium difficile (C-diff: symptomatic infection due to the spore forming bacteria causing watery diarrhea). Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) M donned personal protection equipment (PPE) upon entering…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-05-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00134525, MI00134776, MI00135107, and MI00135738. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide shaves, nail care, and scheduled showers for seven residents (R26, R73, R228, R248, R429, R480, and R487) out of ten residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs), resulting in unmet ADL needs, a feeling of frustration, and the potential for loss of dignity. Findings include: R430 On 5/2/2023 at 11:27 a.m., R430 was observed lying in bed alert and able to be interviewed. R430 was observed with long facial hairs. During an interview, R430 stated, I would love to have a shave because I do not want all the hair on my face. My roommate gets shaved and got one yesterday, but he ended up putting his own shaving cream on and did his own shave. I always had a shave, and they only gave me one shower since I been here. R430 was asked does the staff ask to assist with shaves? R430 stated, They never ask to help shave me, even when I got the one…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-05-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00134180. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served at palatable temperatures for multiple residents on the Medbridge Unit, Resident #65, an unidentified resident, and four out of seven anonymous residents attending a Resident Council Meeting, resulting in resident hunger, dissatisfaction with the meal experience, and the potential for unmet nutritional needs. Findings include: A complainant reported to the State Agency that the facility failed to serve palatable food. In an interview during the resident council meeting on 5/3/2023 at 3:00 PM, four out of seven residents reported the food was not warm when trays arrived for meals. During an observation and interview on 5/4/2023 at 8:21 AM, the last tray on the Medbridge Unit meal cart was obtained and used as a test tray. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) Coordinator A was present during the testing of food temperatures on the breakfast tray. The following temperatures were obtained using a metal stem thermometer: Sausage link #1: 113 ºF…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00135738. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct an initial care conference for one resident (R248) of two residents reviewed for choices, resulting in the missed opportunity for the resident and/or resident representative to participate in the care planning process and make choices about the resident's daily life. Findings include: It was reported to the State Agency that the resident representative was not contacted to discuss plans and goals of care for the resident. A review of the clinical record for Resident #248 (R248) revealed an initial admission date of 2/24/2023 and readmission date of 3/22/2023 with diagnoses that included unspecified disease of the digestive system, depressive disorder, and anxiety disorder. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented severe cognitive impairment. A review of clinical progress notes for R248 revealed in part the following: - 2/24/2023 nursing: .Pt. is A&Ox3 (patient is alert and oriented to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake MI00133152. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to administer medications timely and per physician's orders for one resident (R59) of six residents reviewed for medication administration, resulting in the potential for less than therapeutic effect of the prescribed medication when medications were not taken properly. Findings include: In an observation and interview on 5/9/23 at 11:05 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) O prepared medication for Resident #59 (R59). The medication administration screen had red boxes on each medication. LPN O placed Amlodipine (treats high blood pressure), Aspirin, Plavix (prevents blood clots), Levetiracetam (anticonvulsant), Multivitamin-Minerals, and Senexon-S (prevents constipation) in a medication cup and poured MiraLAX (prevents constipation) in a cup. LPN O entered R59's room and administered the medication and exited the room. LPN O documented the medication administration. When asked if the medication was administered late, LPN O stated Yes. I got behind this morning. In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake number MI00135633. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide transportation for one resident (R431) scheduled for a follow up orthopedic appointment out of one resident reviewed for appointments, resulting in the potential for a delay and frustration in treatment due to multiple missed appointments by the facility. Findings include: Review of the Electronic Health Record (EHR) revealed Resident #431 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses of multiple fractures of ribs from a motor-vehicle accident and pain in left and right knees. R431's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with a reference date of 3/7/2023 indicated R431 had intact cognition with a BIMS (brief interview for mental status) score of 15/15, required extensive assistance of two persons with transfers and bed mobility, extensive assistance of one person for toileting, dressing and hygiene. Review of the ADL care plan created on 3/3/2023…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide timely PICC (peripheral inserted central catheter) line/dressing changes, label an IV (Intravenous, therapy that delivers liquid substances directly into a vein) bag, date an IV tubing, and obtain physician's order for PICC line maintenance for two residents (R43 and R485) reviewed for IV Parenteral fluid resulting in the potential for medication delay and error and a bacterial infection originating at the PICC line site. Findings include: R43 On 5/3/2023 at 1:10 p.m., a bag of IV solution was observed hanging at R43's bedside with no label on the bag and no date on the IV tubing. R43 was observed with a right arm PICC dressing dated 4/23/2023 which appeared soiled and not adhered to the skin. On 5/3/2023 at 4:30 p.m., the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed in R43's room while observing the unlabeled IV bag, undated IV tubing, and the 4/23/2023 dated PICC dressing. The DON was asked about the frequency of a PICC line…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-05-10 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolatedEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a physician responded to a pharmacy recommendation for one resident (R26) out of five residents reviewed for pharmacy recommendations resulting in a missed opportunity for collaboration on a medication recommendation and the potential for unmet medical care needs. Findings include: A review of the clinical record revealed Resident #26 (R26) was admitted into the facility on 1/27/2022. R26's diagnoses included congestive heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and anxiety disorder. A Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] documented intact cognition. A review of a Medication Regimen Review (MRR) for R26 dated 1/9/2023 revealed the following recommendation: The National Osteoporosis Foundation recommends an intake of 800 - 1000 units of vitamin D per day for adults age [AGE] and older. Please consider Vitamin D 1000 units daily. During an interview and record review on 5/8/2023 at 1:45 PM, Unit Manager (UM) F revealed that R26 did not receive…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-05-10 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a smoking policy that addressed the use of electronic cigarettes (e-cigs) for residents of the facility. This deficient practice resulted in two residents (R128 and R230) using e-cigs on the property of a non-smoking facility and staff not being adequately educated about the use of e-cigs. Findings include: During an observation and interview on 5/4/2023 at 1:00 PM with Unit Manager (UM) F, Resident #128 (R128) and Resident #230 (R230) were observed on the facility's front patio using electronic cigarettes. Registered Nurse (RN) H was sitting on the front patio with the two residents. UM F stated, They are not allowed to use those within 150 feet of the building. During an interview on 5/4/2023 at 2:12 PM, RN H said when R230 wanted to vape (use her e-cigs), he got her vapor pens from the unit manager. R230, her friend (R128), and RN H went out on the front patio. According to RN H, he informed R230 that they were not allowed to smoke within 150 feet of the property. R230 told RN H that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$140,322 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $140,322 — penalty dated 2025-08-18
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 1.9 | -0.9 vs chain |
| Staffing | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OM HOLDCO 5 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 04/07/2023 |
| SNW LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 30% | since 04/07/2023 |
| OPTUM MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS. INC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2023 |
| SIENA LENDING GROUP LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST | — | since 04/07/2023 |
| PATEL, RAJAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/07/2023 |
| SHARON, ROBERT | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2024 |
| BRAXTON, LASHAWNDA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/07/2023 |
| DUBY, KATRINA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 04/07/2023 |
| PARKER, SETH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| DUNN, CHARLES | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/25/2025 |
| SHAH, HEMANT | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 04/03/2025 |
| CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| SCHLAUPITZ MADHAVAN | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| CONNER, MARIANNE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 05/13/2024 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 14 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.3M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235618. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-18, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.