ShorePointe Nursing Center

Location & what’s nearby

Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

54.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 556 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

Met the expected recovery: 52.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 256 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.45 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 76% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

Staffing

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 200 beds and averages 157.7 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 42 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.66 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.05 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.52 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.18 on weekdays — 16% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.79 to 0.34 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 63% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

30 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 19 are one tap away and print in full.

• Actual harm · G2025-02-26 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
  Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00150544. Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect one resident (R901) during an abuse investigation out of four residents reviewed for abuse resulting in fear of retaliation and feeling scared. Findings include: A review of a facility reported incident (FRI) submitted 2/13/25 to the State Agency revealed, It was alleged the facility staff misappropriated resident funds. On 2/25/25 at 10:00 AM, R901 explained back in October (2024) they wanted to open a bank account to deposit their check from social security. They had asked their family to assist but they were taking too long. R901 said they had shared they're frustration to Staff A, and the staff member suggested they (the resident) try to open an account over the phone at Staff A's bank. R901 expressed they did not think this would work because it was over the phone, and they only had a picture of their ID on their phone. R901 reported the bank allowed the account to be opened with R901 as…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-22 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
  Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: 2695258Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall for one resident (R901) of two residents reviewed for falls. Findings include:A review of information submitted to the State Agency (SA) revealed the following, On or around November 18, 2025, [R901] was being moved .The staff member, a CNA (certified nursing assistant), dropped [R901] . [R901] was transported to the hospital for care .A review of R901's medical record revealed they were initially admitted into the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included, Quadriplegia, Anxiety, and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. Further review revealed the resident was moderately cognitively impaired and required 2-person assistance for bed mobility and transfers.On 12/22/25 at 9:45 AM, R901 was observed lying in bed and asked about the fall they sustained in November. R901 explained they fell out of bed and was sent to the hospital after complaining of pain. R901 explained there was one staff…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · F2025-04-16 · tag F0800 — widespread
  Provide each resident with a nourishing, palatable, well-balanced diet that meets his or her daily nutritional and special dietary needs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meal portion sizes met the nutritional needs of the residents, resulting in the potential for inadequate protein intake, weight loss, and decreased meal enjoyment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 4/14/25 at 11:15 AM, Dietary [NAME] O was observed serving food at the steam table. Dietary [NAME] O was observed ladling chili into bowls with a 6 ounce ladle. When queried about the portion size for the chili, Dietary [NAME] O stated Is this not right? On 4/14/25 at 11:20 AM, review of the production sheet for the lunch meal, noted that the portion size for the chili was supposed to be 8 ounces. When queried at that time, Certified Food Manager D confirmed that Dietary [NAME] O was using the wrong size ladle. On 4/15/25 at 10:30 AM, a group meeting was conducted with eight confidential group residents and they were asked about the food at the facility. All group members indicated that food portions could be larger.…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
  Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 4/14/25 during an initial observation of the kitchen between 8:45 AM-9:15 AM, the following items were observed: The ice scoop holder was observed with black debris on the inside bottom surface. The tip of the ice scoop was resting in the black debris. When queried, Certified Food Manager (CFM) D stated she would clean it right away. According to the Food & Drug administration (FDA) 2017 Model Food Code, Section 3-304.12 In-Use Utensils, Between-Use Storage, During pauses in food preparation or dispensing, food preparation and dispensing utensils shall be stored: .(E) In a clean, protected location if the utensils, such as ice scoops, are used only with a food that is not potentially hazardous (time/temperature control for safety food) . The ice machine filter was observed to be…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
  Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide person centered care plans for two sampled residents (R78 and R46) of three whose care plans were reviewed. Findings include: R78 A review of R78's medical record revealed an initial admission into the facility on 9/16/20, and a readmission date of 5/11/23 with diagnoses that included Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following Cerebral Infarction, Diabetes, Vascular Dementia, and Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required 1-2 person assist for activities of daily living. A review of R78's care plan did not reveal a care plan for the resident's diagnoses of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder or Vascular Dementia. On 4/16/25 at 12:01 PM, Social Worker A was asked about R78's missing care plan related to their PTSD and Vascular Dementia and explained she would investigate and get back with the surveyor. At 1:14 PM, Social Worker A followed-up with surveyor and acknowledged…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
  Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00151407 and MI00151269. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respond to call lights and provide activities of daily living care (ADLs) in a timely manner for one resident (R152) and eight confidential group residents, of thirteen residents reviewed for ADLs. Findings include: R152 On 4/14/25 at 9:40 AM, R152 was met in their room and interviewed regarding the care they received at the facility. R152 indicated they frequently wait a long time for assistance with care. R152 indicated they had been waiting for over an hour to have their brief changed this morning. R152's call light was observed to be on the floor by the bed out of reach of the resident. At 9:50 AM, an observation was made of staff entering R152's room with a breakfast tray, setting the breakfast tray on the resident's bedside table and exiting the room. On 4/15/25 at 9:38 AM, a follow-up visit was conducted with R152. R152 indicated they had a wet brief and proceeded to…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
  Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate amount of water flush was provided between administration of individual medications via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications), for one resident (R73) of four observed during medication administration. Findings include: On 04/15/25 at 9:09 AM, a medication administration via a PEG tube for R73 was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E. LPN E was observed to prepare medications for R73, nine were crushed for administration via R73's PEG tube. The PEG tube was uncapped and the tip of an open graduated 50 milliliter (ml) syringe was placed into the opening. An initial water flush of between 30 and 40 milliliters (mls) was observed to be completed via gravity. (The orders indicated a flush amount of 20-30 ml.) Each of the nine medications had been placed into plastic 30 ml medication cup. The initial medication cup was filled with 20 -…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
  Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error of less than five percent for one resident (R73) of five residents reviewed for medication observation, resulting in a medication error rate of 12.82%. Findings include: On 04/15/25 at 9:09 AM, a medication administration for R73 via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E. LPN E was observed to prepare medications for R73, nine were crushed for administration via R73's PEG tube. The PEG tube was uncapped and the tip of an open graduated syringe was placed into the opening. An initial water flush of between 30 and 40 milliliters (mls) was observed to be completed via gravity. The next four medications were followed with an additional 20-30 mls of water. R73 then reported they were feeling full and may need to throw up. LPN E then paused and added the last five crushed medications all…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · D2025-04-16 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
  Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00152118. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the blood pressure medication (Clonidine) for one resident (R73) of one resident reviewed was administered as needed per physician order Findings include: On 04/15/25 at 9:09 AM, a medication pass observation for R73 was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E. Prior to the pass of medication LPN E checked the blood pressure of R73. The blood pressure (BP)was documented as 197/96 and a heart rate of 71. LPN E reported they would need to report this to the physician and upon review observed the active physician order dated 04/09/25, Clonidine .1 mg (milligram), give one tablet via a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube (a tube that is placed directly into the stomach through an abdominal wall incision for administration of food, fluids, and medications) every six hours, PRN (as needed) for hypertension (high BP). Administer for SBP (systolic BP) greater than 160 and…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
  Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to discard expired, label with resident identifier and date when opened biologicals in three of four medications carts and one of four medication rooms reviewed. Findings include: On [DATE] at 8:50 AM, the three [NAME] high medication cart was observed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) P. A dorzolamide eye drop vial was not labeled with a resident identifier nor date opened; glucose strips were not dated when opened; two insulin aspart vials were dated 3/10 and 3/05 and expired; A Basalgar insulin pen was not dated when opened; Two Trelegy inhalers were not dated when opened; and a Arnuity inhaler was not dated when opened on the inhaler and did not have an identifier on the inhaler. On [DATE] at 4:46 PM, the two [NAME] medication room was observed with LPN Q. A tuberculin vial was open, but not dated. On [DATE] at 9:44 AM an observation of the medication cart for revealed Latanoprost Eye drops laying outside of the box, without an…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
• Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-16 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
  Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
  What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

  Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a tube feeding (TF) pole in a sanitary manner for one sampled resident (R128) of one reviewed for tube feeding sanitation. Findings Include: On 4/14/25 at 2:10 PM, R128 was observed lying in bed with their tube feeding in place noting a bag of Isosource 1.5 cal missing the resident's name, date, time, or order. The tube feeding pole and base were observed to have a very thick layer of brown dried tube feed stuck to it. Also noted were a pair of used gloves on the floor. A review of R128's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 6/7/24 with diagnoses of Hemiplegia and Hemiparesis following a Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia, and Diabetes. Further review revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and was dependent on enteral feed for nutrition. On 4/15/25 at 8:59 AM, R128's tube feeding pole was observed to have a thick layer of brown tube feeding fluid stuck to it. In addition, there was a pool of wet fluid observed on the floor. On 4/16/25 at 10:50 AM, R128's tube…

  This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

  Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

CMS files one row per role, so the 41 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

16 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

This home reported $4.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 22% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI