Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Muskegon
1061 West Hackley Avenue, Muskegon, MI 49441 · For profit - Corporation · 107 certified beds · (231) 755-2255 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- no federal fines or payment denials on record
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- it has 1 actual-harm citation
- a high number of inspection citations overall (45) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 3 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 12.4% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 9.4% | 5.4% | 5.4% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.9% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.0% | 1.5% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 1.6% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.8% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 17.9% | 12.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 20.0% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 89.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 7.3% | 5.1% | 4.7% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 23.2% | 20.0% | 21.2% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 20.1% | 14.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 52.9% | 79.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 13.4% | 24.0% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.4% | 11.7% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.92 | 1.84 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.72 | 1.64 | 1.80 | worse |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
51.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 47 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 54.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 33 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.25 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 24% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 51.5%CMS range 38.7–64.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.1%CMS range 8.2–17.1 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 54.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 42.4% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 57.6% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.9%CMS range 4.8–13.8 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.89 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 107 beds and averages 80.6 residents a day — about 75% occupied, or roughly 26 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.21 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.65 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.92 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.77 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.38 on weekdays — 18% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.73 to 0.45 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 51% is about the same as the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
45 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 34 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-05-28 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation refers to Intake 3012437. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent a fall with injury for 1 of 3 residents (R2) reviewed for accident hazards, resulting in R2 sustaining a fractured nasal bone and lacerations to the face. Findings include: A review of R2's Face Sheet, dated 5/26/26, revealed they were a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R2's Face Sheet revealed they had multiple diagnoses that included cerebral infarction (a stroke), lack of coordination, and muscle spasm. A review of R2's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs), dated 3/12/26, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15 which revealed R2 was cognitively intact. In addition, R2's MDS revealed they were dependent on staff for bed mobility (rolling side-to-side) and for toileting hygiene. A review of R2's progress notes, dated 4/26/26 to 5/26/26, revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain best practices in the food service area resulting in the potential to spread food borne illness to all residents that consume food from the kitchen in a current facility census of 87 residents. Findings Include:On 01/12/2026 at 9:27AM, observation in Dining room [ROOM NUMBER], the drain line for the ice machine was not air gapped, the flexible line from ice machine was sitting with the end sitting directly in the drain. On 01/12/2026 at 3:07PM, during interview with Maintenance Manager (MM) R it was found that MM R was not aware the drain line was not properly air gapped. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 5-402.11 Backflow Prevention.(A) Except as specified in (B), (C), and (D) of this section, a direct connection may not exist between the SEWAGE system and a drain originating from EQUIPMENT in which FOOD, portable EQUIPMENT, or UTENSILS are placed. P(B) Paragraph (A) of this section does not apply to floor drains that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Infection Prevention and Control Policies and Procedures and have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP), resulting in the potential for increased risk of respiratory and other infections among all residents in the facility. Findings include: Resident 16 (R16) Review of an admission Record reflected R16 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included end stage renal disease and dependence on renal dialysis. During an observation on 1/13/2026 at 8:40 AM reflected Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) E was assisting with incontinence care for R16 and wore only gloves and a surgical mask. A sign hanging outside the door reflected R16 required EBP. Review of an R16's physician orders reflected Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP): AV Fistula Left Forearm every shift for infection control -Start Date- 8/4/2025. Review of a Care Plan initiated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to develop and/or implement Comprehensive Care Plans for 4 residents (R23, R25, R54 and R90) out of 19 residents reviewed for care planning.R90 Review of an admission Record reflected R90 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), unspecified dementia, and an unspecified lack of expected normal physiological development in childhood. Review of an admission assessment dated [DATE] reflected R90 admitted to the facility with a right heel blister measuring 1.0 cm (centimeters) x 1.2 cm without any depth. Review of a Braden Scale-For predicting Pressure Ulcer Risk Evaluation dated 1/8/2026 reflected R90 was at risk for pressure ulcers. Review of a Care Plan initiated on 1/8/2026 reflected Resident (R90) has actual skin breakdown in the following locations: R-heel blister - L (left) hip surgical incision - R (right) groin fissure. Interventions included Encourage the resident to turn and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2026-01-14 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — patternProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record reviews, the facility failed to staff the 400 & 500 Hallways to meet the acuity and psychosocial needs of 25 residents including R6 and R70.Findings include:R70Review of an admission Record revealed R70 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnosis which included Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Muscle wasting and atrophy, polyneuropathy, depressive and anxiety disorders.During interview on 1/12/2026 at 10:33 AM, R70 stated, I think they have a staffing problem because when I used to ask to get up the aides could never find another staff member to help. R70 stated, I need a hoyer and 2 people to get out of bed. I quit asking the staff to get me up because they kept telling me No. R70 stated she would like to get out of bed, out of my room, but it probably will not happen.During an interview on 1/13/2026 at 4:34 PM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) X revealed that acuity is high down here (referring to Residents on 400-Hallway), almost everyone…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 3 Residents (R3, R23 and R25) of 19 Residents sampled.Findings include:: Resident #3 (R3) A review of R3's admission Record, dated 1/14/26, revealed R3 was a [AGE] year-old resident re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with multiple diagnosis that included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebrovascular disease affecting right dominant side, muscle wasting and atrophy, and dementia. An observation of 500 hallway on 1/12/2026 at approximately 9:53 AM R3 revealed he was in pain and needed some pain medication. Durning an interview on 1/12/2026 at 9:54 AM, Registered Nurse (RN) C stated, (Name of R3) went on hospice a couple of weeks ago. RN C revealed resident had a significant decline and is no longer really eating and reports increased pain. A review of R3's medical record reflected one of the only indications this resident was being seen by Hospice was the change in payer source as evidenced by…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-01-14 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, and interview, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the premises affecting occupants of halls 100, 200 and 400. Findings include: On 01/12/2026 at 9:15AM, observed in the hallway restroom on Hall 100 at the handsink, the cold-water line at faucet is not providing any water, all water access at handsink is coming from the hot-water line which is providing water at 116 degrees F On 01/12/2026 at 9:27AM, observed in Dining room [ROOM NUMBER] on Hall 400, visible mold growth at the bottom of the cabinet where the drain for the ice machine is located. On 01/12/2026 at 10:34AM, the end cap on the handrail near room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed missing, the wall had holes in it, less than a half inch in diameter, and an unsecured ethernet cord was observed coming out of the hole, less than 5 feet up on the wall. On 01/12/2026 at 10:39 AM, the end cap on the handrail near room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed missing, observed broken plastic corner guard by door of room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview the facility failed to provide a dignified dining experience for all residents for at least 3 of 5 residents (R19, R79 and R94) in a dining/activity room out of 19 residents reviewed for Resident Rights. During an observation of the noon meal in the dining/activity room on 1/12/2026 at 12:10 PM, R79 and her husband were complaining about being served cabbage too frequently. R79 received cabbage soup with her meal and at approximately 12:20 PM. R79 and her husband were asked if she would have preferred the tomato soup. They responded, yes. When asked if they wanted staff to get tomato soup, they responded they have to make meal choices before 10:00 AM for the lunch meal. They said they have been told no in the past when asking for substitutions. Several staff were in the area and did not respond to providing the alternate soup choice. During an observation of the noon meal in the dining/activity room on 1/12/2026 at 12:18 PM R94 was sitting at a table in the middle of the room with 3 other residents. They were talking loud about not being able to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — isolatedHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow its concern/grievance process and address family and resident concerns for 1 resident (R19) out of 19 residents reviewed for Resident Rights. Findings:Review of an admission Record reflected R19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, nutritional deficiency, unspecified and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). During an interview on 1/12/2026 at 11:58 AM, R19's Family Member (FM) L, who visits R19 almost daily and typically during meals, reports that the ordered magic cup and mighty shake (both nutritional supplements intended to boost protein intake) are not on the resident tray as ordered with every meal. FM L reports the supplements are not on R19's meal tray 75% of the time and he is frustrated by this because R19 has had significant weight loss. FM L reported he has complained about this issue many times. FM L also reported that they have been unable to get resolution to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review the facility failed to address Pre-admission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASARR) in a timely manner for 2 Resident's (R11 & R12) out of 19 resulting in them being completed late.Findings include: Review of Policy & Procedure for Pre-admission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASARR) Revised Date 3/10/25, revealed, It is the policy of the facility to screen any resident with mental illness and/intellectual/development disabilities through the PASARR process to ensure appropriate nursing facility services and specialized services are provided. Further review of the Policy Procedure reflects that, The Social Service employee or designee, is responsible for verifying that the PAS and/or ARR processes are completed appropriately and timely. The PASARR process must be completed in the following situations, Prior to admission in Nursing Facility; After a significant change in the resident's condition; and Not less than annually. The procedure also reflected the Annual Resident Review is due within one year of the previous one being submitted or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to complete a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission for 2 Residents (R23 and R25) of 2 residents reviewed for baseline care plans.Findings included:Resident 23Review of R23's admission record dated 1/13/26 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: Pressure-induced deep tissue damage of sacral region, Alzheimer's disease, and muscle wasting. R23 was not her own responsible party.Review of R23's Skin - Total Body Eval -V2, dated 12/17/26 and signed by Unit Manager (UM) I revealed, Right thigh rear - possible pressure - unable to determine will require RN (registered nurse) assessment or eval by wound nurse for definitive etiology 5.6 x 4.8 x 0.2 (islands of epithelial present within these measurements). Left thigh (rear) - possible pressure - unable to determine will require RN assessment or eval by wound nurse for definitive etiology 5.0 x 5.2 x 0.2 (islands of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 34 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor care to potentially prevent sepsis/hospitalization for one (R1) and failed to assess and monitor moisture associated skin damage (MASD) for one (R4) of two residents reviewed for quality of care.Findings include:Resident #1 (R1)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R1 originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of a displaced fracture of the right femur (thigh bone), emphysema, and mental disorder. On 9/28/25 R1 received new diagnoses of sepsis and pneumonia. During an observation on 1/12/26 at 10:00 AM, R1 was lying in bed and did not want to talk at this time. Review of an Incident Report for R1 dated 8/21/25 at 11:18 AM revealed: Incident Description: Another staff member Alerted this nurse that resident was in need of assistance. Writer entered to observe resident sitting on floor in front of radiator. Resident Description: I tried to use the urinal standing up and just lost my balance. The resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to provide care and services according to professional standards to prevent the development and/or worsening of pressure injuries for 3 residents (R23, R54 and R90) out of 5 residents reviewed for pressure injuries. R23 Review of R23's admission record dated 1/13/26 revealed she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: Pressure-induced deep tissue damage of sacral region, Alzheimer's disease, and muscle wasting. R23 was not her own responsible party. Review of R23's Skin – Total Body Eval -V2 dated 12/17/26 and signed by Unit Manager (UM) I revealed, Right thigh rear – possible pressure – unable to determine will require RN (Registered Nurse) assessment or eval by wound nurse for definitive etiology 5.6 x 4.8 x 0.2 (islands of epithelial present within these measurements). Left thigh (rear) – possible pressure – unable to determine will require RN assessment or eval by wound nurse for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper positioning/support for one (R56) of 3 residents reviewed for positioning.Findings include: Review of a Face Sheet revealed R56 had pertinent diagnoses of hemiplegia and hemiparesis (one sided weakness) affecting the left side and chronic kidney disease. During an observation on 1/12/26 at 10:20 AM, R56 was observed transporting down the hall in a wheelchair with her left arm flaccid and not supported.During an observation on 1/13/26 at approximately 11:00 AM, R56 was observed in bed without support for her left arm. R56 was then transferred to a wheelchair in anticipation of an appointment. R56's arm was not supported and hanging down in her lap as she was transported out of the facility. Review of the Care Plan for R56 revealed: ADL (activities of daily living) self-care deficit related to physical limitations. No goals documented. Interventions included: LUE (left upper extremity) Sling on when seated in (wheelchair) or standing/ambulating as resident will allow, initiated 10/30/25.In an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prevent falls for 1 (R1) of 2 residents reviewed for falls, and unsafe self-administration of medications left at the bedside for 2 (R13 and R27), of 2 residents observed with medications at the bedside.Findings include:Review of R13's admission record dated 1/14/26 revealed R13 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: acute kidney failure, muscle wasting, unsteadiness on feet, bipolar disorder, and chronic pain syndrome. R13 was her own responsible party. During the medication pass observation on 1/13/26 at 8:00 AM, R13 had a bottle of nasal spray (Nasal Relief Oxymetazoline HCL 0.55 %) on her bedside table. R13 said she had been taking this nasal spray since admission and was assessed to be independent taking it. R13 said she takes it daily around 1:00 pm but denied reporting to any nurse she had been taking the nasal spray. R13 denied being set up with any secure storage for this…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure ordered supplements were provided to one resident with significant weight loss (R19) out of 2 residents reviewed for nutrition and hydration. Review of an admission Record reflected R19 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included severe protein-calorie malnutrition, nutritional deficiency, unspecified and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). Review of a Care Plan initiated 7/25/2025 reflected R19 was at risk for repeated alteration in skin integrity related to . poor nutritional intake due to dysphagia. An intervention for this focus area of the care plan was to provide diet and supplements per physician order. The Care Plan also indicated R19 required assistance with ADLs (activities for daily living) that included needing set up assistance for eating. Review of a Care Plan initiated on 7/7/2025 reflected (R19) is at unavoidable nutritional risk related to atrial fibrillation (abnormally fast pulse), CHF…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor ongoing irritation and drainage of a PEG tube (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tube) insertion site for one (R20) of 2 residents reviewed for tube feedings. Findings include:Resident #20 (R20)Review of a Progress note dated 1/6/26 for R20 revealed: Resident red and irritated around peg site, cleansed (with) normal saline and applied skin guard cream and split sponge. Review of a Skin assessment dated [DATE] for R20 revealed no skin concerns.During an observation and an interview on 1/13/26 at 10:52 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) V was questioned about the condition of R20's PEG tube (Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy tubes). At this time LPN V went to change the split gauze covering the abdominal insertion site and the PEG tube bumper (base of the PEG tube before its inserted). The gauze had some reddish clear drainage, and the insertion site was red (about a nickel sized area) and crusted with some clear…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to assess, monitor and treat 1 Resident's (R25) respiratory condition of 1 Resident reviewed for respiratory care.Findings included:Review of R25's admission record dated 1/14/26 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: muscle wasting and atrophy (waste away), burns involving 10-19% of body surface with 0% to 9% third degree burns and unsteady on feet. R25 was his own responsible party. R25 was observed in bed on 1/13/26 at 12:18 PM. R25's C-PAP machine was on his nightstand. R25 said he does normally use the machine when sleeping to help him breathe, but he can't use it every night. R25 said no one has assisted him with his CPAP or his breathing needs since admission.During an interview with Unit Manager (UM) I on 1/13/26 at 4:00 PM, UM I said R25's hospital discharge summary did indicate that he used a C-PAP machine. UM I said R25 was transferred to the facility on [DATE] but…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolatedProvide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to coordinate care consistent with the professional standards of practice by assessing and monitoring pre and post dialysis treatments, communicating and collaborating with the dialysis facility regarding care and medication reconciliation for one (R56) of 3 residents reviewed for dialysis. Findings include:Resident #56 (R56)Review of a Face Sheet revealed R56 admitted to the facility on [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses of end stage renal disease (ESRD), heart failure, and dependence on renal dialysis. During an interview on 1/12/26 at 10:18 AM, R56 reported she goes to dialysis on Tuesdays, Thursdays, and Saturdays. R56 reported she usually has high potassium and high phosphorus levels. R56 reported she did not recall if she takes a communication form to dialysis or brings any forms back after dialysis. Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) for R56 revealed the last dialysis communication at the time of this survey was 12/30/25.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolatedDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer and provide Influenza and Pneumococcal Immunizations to 1 Resident (R54) of 5 Residents sampled for Immunizations.Findings included:Review of R54's admission record dated 1/12/26 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: Hydrocephalus (fluid on the brain), Diabetes insipidus (disease which causes increase secretion response of the pituitary hormone resulting in increased diluted urine), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and communication deficit. R54 was not his own responsible party.Review of R54's electronic medical record revealed no request for consent for vaccinations, no orders for vaccinations and no vaccination records.During an interview with the facility Infection Preventionist (IP) A on 1/13/26 at 1:40 PM R 54's) Electronic Medical Record was reviewed. IP A said she did not review R54's vaccination records and get consent forms to his responsible party for vaccinations…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer and provide a COVID-19 Vaccination to 1 Resident (R54) of 5 Residents sampled for COVID-19 Vaccinations.Based on interview and record review the facility failed to offer and provide a COVID-19 Vaccination to 1 Resident (R54) of 5 Residents sampled for COVID-19 Vaccinations.Findings included:Review of R54's admission record dated 1/12/26 revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: Hydrocephalus (fluid on the brain), Diabetes insipidus (disease which causes increase secretion response of the pituitary hormone resulting in increased diluted urine), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) and communication deficit. R54 was not his own responsible party.Review of R54's electronic medical record revealed no request for consent for COVID-19 vaccinations, no orders for COVID-19 vaccinations and no vaccination records were located.During an interview with the facility Infection Preventionist (IP) A on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-12-17 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to assess to determine if resident was appropriate for lone transfer in accordance with professional standards of care related to mental and physical conditions for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for quality of care. Findings include:Resident #1 (R1)A review of R1's Electronic Medical Record (EMR) indicated that R9 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnosis including functional quadriplegia, chronic pain syndrome, morbid obesity, abnormalities of gait and mobility, weakness, spinal stenosis, and adjustment disorder with mixed anxiety and depressed mood. The EMR revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) was performed on 9/25/25 where R1 scored a 10 out of 15, meaning R1 has moderate problems with thinking and memory.Therapy progress notes dated 8/20/25: Quarterly Therapy Screen Completed: Patient demonstrates minimal out of bed activity with deficits in mobility, strength, and ADLs. Patient…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-11-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation is related to intake # MI00147858 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow professional standards and ensure 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #400) received a physician ordered medication to treat an infection and failed to obtain ordered labs and tests required to monitor the efficacy and safety of the medication. Findings: Resident #400 (R400) Review of an admission Record revealed R400 was a [AGE] year old male, originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R400 had 2 recent hospital admissions. The first from 07/05/24 to 08/21/24 and the second, that lead to the admission to the nursing facility, was from 08/26/24 to 08/31/24. During the first hospital admission, R400 was diagnosed with enterococcal meningitis (a fungal infection that effected the brain) and on 08/09/24 started on a medication called itraconazole. Review of an Infectious Disease hospital follow up note for R400, dated 08/26/24, reflected the following assessment .currently on treatment for cryptococcus…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: During a tour of the kitchen, at 10:05 AM on 10/28/24, it was observed that the hand wash sink, near the dish machine, was found to not have hot water coming out of the fixture. At this time a temperature of the hot water was taken with a rapid read thermometer and found to only reach 66F. Observation under the sink found a mixing valve with a water line also going to an eye wash station. At this time, an interview with Dietary Aide G found that hand sink doesn't seem to get hot. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section 5-202.12 Handwashing Sink, Installation. (A) A HANDWASHING SINK shall be equipped to provide water at a temperature of at least 38oC (100oF) through a mixing valve or combination faucet. During a tour of the kitchen, at 10:08 AM on 10/28/24, observation of the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain general cleanliness and repair of the premises. This resulted in an increased potential for contamination and a possible decrease in the satisfaction of living, affecting residents in the 300, 400 and 500 halls. Findings include: During a tour of the kitchen, at 10:30 AM on 10/28/24, it was observed that some non LED lights were missing their light shields over the preparation and serving area. During a tour of the facility, with Maintenance Director (MD) E, starting at 1:05 PM on 10/28/24, the following observations were made: A review of the 300 hall janitors closet found a Y valve connected to the spout of the janitors sink with both valves closed and the sink left on. This set up puts undue back pressure on the faucets internal vacuum breaker, of which it is not rated to handle. An interview with MD E found that they just got a new chemical dispense system and a vendor has been setting up these areas. A review of the 300 hall clean linen…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide care in a dignified manner for 2 residents (Resident #57 and Resident #73) out of 18 residents reviewed for quality care. Findings include: Resident #73 (R73) Review of an admission Record reflected R73 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (partial or complete paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke, difficulty walking, and dysphagia. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected R73 was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15. Review of a Care Plan revealed R73 has limited/impaired physical mobility and had an Activity for Daily Living (ADL) self-care performance deficit related to a stroke and right sided weakness. The plan of care indicated R73 needed two people to assist with showers and bathing, toilet use and transfers. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to A) Develop, implement and evaluate the effectiveness of care planned interventions, B) Complete required assessments and follow-up after a fall, C) Accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessments, and D) Track incidents and accidents as an aspect of Quality Assurance (QA) for 1 resident (Resident #69) out of 18 residents reviewed for quality care. Findings: Resident #69 (R69) Review of an admission Record reflected R69 admitted to the facility from the hospital following a stroke which resulted in hemiplegia and hemiparesis (loss of strength or paralysis on one side of the body) and high blood pressure. During an interview and observation on 10/29/2024 at 10:26 AM, R69 reported he had concerns related to understanding what level of function he could perform on his own. R69 was seated in a wheelchair when he reported that he took pride in making his own bed and transferring himself to the bathroom using a quad cane. R69 reported…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and monitor a wound for 6 weeks for 1 Resident (R28) of 2 residents reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the potential of R28's pressure ulcer to worsen due to missed assessments. Findings: Resident #28 Review of an admission Record revealed R28 was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE], with pertinent diagnoses which included: Osteomyelitis of Vertebra, Sacral and Sacrococcygeal Region, End Stage Renal Disease, Flaccid Hemiplegia Affecting Right Dominant Side, Colostomy, Disorganized Schizophrenia, and Anxiety Disorder. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment for R28, with a reference date of 8/15/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11, out of a total possible score of 15, which indicated R28 was moderately cognitively impaired. Further review of R28's MDS reflected she is at risk for pressure ulcers and currently had an Unhealed Pressure Ulcer. The record reflected she had 1…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure licensed staff carried out physician orders according to professional standards for the care of residents who receive enteral feeding for one resident (Resident #73), out of one resident reviewed for tube feeding from a total sample of 18 residents. Findings include: Resident #73 (R73) Review of an admission Record reflected R73 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (partial or complete paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke, difficulty walking, and dysphasia. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected R73 was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15. Review of physician orders on the October 2024 Medication Administration Record (MAR) reflect: Enteral Feed Order every shift related to DYSPHAGIA FOLLOWING UNSPECIFIED CEREBRAL VASCULAR…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 2 of 18 sampled residents (R8 and R12), resulting in the potential for providers not having an accurate and complete picture of the resident's stay at the facility. Findings include: R8 A review of R8's admission Record, dated [DATE], revealed that R8 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R8's admission Record revealed they had multiple diagnoses that included anxiety, depression, obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD), schizophrenia, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). A review of R8's electronic medical record (EMR), dated [DATE] to [DATE], revealed the facility had completed a Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASARR) Level I Screening on [DATE]. R8's PASARR Level I Screening indicated that a Level II Evaluation (a comprehensive evaluation that is conducted to confirm or rule out a serious mental illness, intellectual disability, or related conditions and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) according to facility policy for one resident (Resident #73) out of 18 residents reviewed for infection control from a total sample of 18 residents. Findings: Resident #73 (R73) Review of an admission Record reflected R73 admitted to the facility with diagnoses that included non-traumatic intracerebral hemorrhage (stroke), hemiplegia and hemiparesis (partial or complete paralysis on one side of the body) following a stroke, difficulty walking, and dysphagia. Review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] reflected R73 was moderately cognitively impaired as evidenced by a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 11/15. During an interview on 10/30/24 at 9:40 AM, R73 said he did not know anything about a sign on his door indicating he was in Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP) and said staff do no wear a gown when providing direct care. Review of R73's October 2024 Treatment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake #MI00143516 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure effective hot water sanitization of resident dishes, utensils and facility cookware. Findings: Review of the 2017 Food Code reflected Effective mechanical hot water sanitization occurs when the surface temperatures of utensils passing through the warewashing (dishwashing) machine meet or exceed the required 71°C (160 degrees Fahrenheit (F)). On 7/24/24 an observation, interview, and record review were conducted of the operation of the facility dishwashing machine. Dietary Manager (DM) G initiated a wash and rinse cycle after placing a surface temperature measuring device called a puck into the machine. While the temperature gauge of the incoming hot water reflected 194 degrees F the puck revealed a dishware surface temperature of 149.5 F. A repeat test reflected a puck result of 155.6 degrees F. Review of the facility High Temperature Dish Machine Logs from May 2024 to date of July 2024 reflected consistent recorded Daily Puck Temp of less than 160 degrees…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI00145822 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement the mechanical lift transfer of one Resident (R105) in accordance with the facility policy. Findings: Review of the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) admission Record reflected R105 admitted to the facility 5/16/24 with diagnoses that included: Parkinson's Disease, Arthritis, and Anxiety. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected R105 was dependent on staff assistance for toilet use. Review of the facility five-day investigation reflected on 7/15/24, R105 had complained of a bruise to her left hand. The facility investigation reflected that on 7/14/25, R105 was transferred by a mechanical lift to and from the bathroom toilet by Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) D. The facility investigation reflected that R105 reported that CNA D was moving too fast, was in a hurry, and her left hand had been grabbed resulting in a bruise. This report reflected the Medical Provider, law enforcement, and the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to: 1. Ensure proper storage of food and clean and sanitary supplies; 2. Clean food and non-food contact surfaces to sight and touch; 3. Properly store food product under refrigeration; and 4. Ensure proper instillation of an air gap on food contact equipment. These conditions resulted in an increased risk of contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness that affected 74 residents who consume food from the kitchen. Findings Include: 1. During the initial tour of the kitchen, at 8:15 AM on 10/16/23, it was observed that two boxes of shell eggs were found stored on the middle shelf above cartons of milk. When asked if these eggs were appropriately stored, Dietary Manager H stated he will move the eggs to the bottom. During a tour of dining room one nourishment room, at 9:20 AM on 10/16/23, it was observed that paper towels and chemical containers were stored underneath the wastewater line of the sink. During a tour of dining…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure monthly pharmacy drug regimen review recommendations were reviewed by the physician and/or acted upon in a timely manner for 3 of 5 residents reviewed (R23, R59, and R62), resulting in the potential for the physician not knowing of a pharmacy recommendation, the potential for a delay in implementing a pharmacy recommendation, and the potential for adverse effects from medications that the pharmacy identified as potential medication issues. Findings include: Resident #59 (R59) A review of R59's admission Record, dated 10/17/23, revealed R59 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R59's admission Record revealed multiple diagnoses that included depression and paraphilia (a mental disorder). A review of R59's MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 11 which indicated R59 was moderately cognitively intact. A review of R59's pharmacy recommendation report, dated 12/12/22, revealed the pharmacist recommended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-10-18 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
On 10/16/23 at 0:23 AM a review was conducted of the 400 Hall medication cart with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) L. Review of the top drawer of the 400 Hall medication cart revealed an in-use undated Humalog Quick pen for Resident #17 (R17). LPN L reported that insulin devices are to be dated when first placed in service. On 10/17/23 at 11:30 AM a review was conducted of the 300 Hall medication cart with LPN B. Review of the top drawer of this medication cart revealed an in-use vial of Lispro insulin for R40. The vial was dated 9/1. LPN B reported that insulin vials are to be dated when opened and are good for twenty-eight or thirty days. Further review of the top drawer of the medication cart revealed a Novolog insulin pen dated 9/15/23 also for R40. A Novolog insulin pen for R33 was observed to be undated. Review of the Doctor's Orders for R17, R33, and R40 reflected all Residents have current orders for insulin. Review of the Manufacturer's instructions for Humalog and Lispro insulin devices and vials reflect these be discarded after 28 days after first use even if it still has…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — patternMake sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain a clean, sanitary, and comfortable environment in one soiled utility room (100 Hall), one shower room (200 Hall), one clean utility room (200 Hall), and four resident rooms (room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], room [ROOM NUMBER], and room [ROOM NUMBER]), resulting in an unclean, unsanitary, and uncomfortable environment. Findings include: During an observation on 10/15/23 10:00 AM, the bathroom floor in room [ROOM NUMBER] was observed to have brownish black stain/soiling on the floor in front of toilet measuring approximately 29 inches by 29 inches. Stool and urine were observed on the toilet bowl rim and under the toilet seat. Urine and stool were also observed on the over-the-toilet chair seat. During an observation on 10/15/23 at 1:00 PM, dried bowel movement splash was observed on the toilet bowl (inner portion) and toilet seat, and accumulation of debris was observed on the underside of the toilet chair in the bathroom of room [ROOM…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0644 — isolatedCoordinate assessments with the pre-admission screening and resident review program; and referring for services as needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to coordinate with the appropriate, State-designated authority, to ensure that 1 of 2 residents (R33) reviewed received timely follow-up PASSAR II evaluations, resulting in the potential for a delay in care and services appropriate to their needs. Findings include: A review of R33's admission Record, dated 10/16/23, revealed R33 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R33's admission Record revealed multiple diagnoses that included mild intellectual disabilities. A review of R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs), dated 7/26/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15 which revealed R33 was cognitively intact. A review of R33's Preadmission Screening/Annual Resident Review (PASSAR), dated 3/29/22, revealed R33 was screened (Level 1 screening) and qualified for a comprehensive assessment (Level…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — isolatedEnsure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure fresh water and a call light were accessible for one physically and cognitively impaired Resident (R25) resulting in thirst, inability to request assistance, anxiety, and the potential for all facility residents to not be monitored or assisted with activities of daily living. Findings: Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected R25 admitted to the facility 11/18/22 and had current diagnoses that included: Neurological Disorders, Renal Insufficiency, Dementia, and Anxiety. The MDS reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 0 out of 15 which indicated R25 was cognitively impaired. Review of this MDS Section G (Functional Status) revealed that R25 required the assistance of two staff members for bed mobility and transfers and required set-up help for eating and drinking. On 10/15/23 at 3:24 PM, R25 was observed supine in her bed. R25 stated I need water, repeating I'm so thirsty. R25 reported that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an Activities program was implemented to meet the interests and needs for two Residents (R475 and R47) resulting in a lack of life enrichment and the potential for social isolation and boredom for these and all facility residents. Findings: Review of the medical record reflected R475 admitted to the facility 8/1/2003 with pertinent diagnoses that included Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI), Dementia, Anxiety and Depression. Review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 4 out of 15 which indicated R475 was cognitively impaired. Section B of this MDS reflected R475 is usually understood and understands. Review of the Care Plan reflected that R475 is dependent for meeting emotional, intellectual, physical, and social needs with a Goal that The resident will attend/participate in activities of choice multiple times weekly . Interventions include . 1:1(one on one) bedside/in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation the facility failed to discard expired tube feeding supplements. These conditions resulted in an increased risk for contaminated foods and an increased risk of food borne illness for individuals who are prescribed these specific supplements. Findings include: During a tour of the facility, with Regional Housekeeping Manager I, at 11:07 AM on 10/16/23, it was observed that the facility storage closet on the 300 hall was found with boxes of expired tube feeding medications. Observation of the storage room found the following expired tube feeding supplies stored on the bottom shelf of an open wire rack: three bottles of Osmolite with a best by date of 1APR2022, one box (six to a box) of Osmolite with a best by date of 1JAN2023, one box of Osmolite with a best by date of 1FEB2023, one box of Osmolite with a best by date of 1MAR2023, one box of Osmolite with a best by date of 1JUN2023, one box of Nepro with a best by date of 1APR2022, two boxes of Nepro with best by dates of 1AUG2023, one box of Nepro with a best by date of 1SEP2023.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing was changed for one Resident (R21) resulting in the potential for infection and failure to follow facility protocol and the potential for all facility residents that use oxygen devices to not have them properly maintained. Findings: Review of the medical record reflected R21 was admitted [DATE] with pertinent diagnoses that include Respiratory Failure and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. During an observation conducted 10/15/23 at 10:44 AM, R21 was observed lying in bed with the resident receiving oxygen via nasal cannula tubing. R21's nasal cannula tubing was observed attached to his oxygen concentrator and the tubing was dated 10/08/23. Review of R21's Physician orders reflected, Oxygen Equipment Management 6/6/23 at 16:54 --change out, date & label all tubing/bags/set ups .clean filter and wipe down machine every night shift every Sun for cleaning routine. During an observation on 10/16/23 at 8:33 AM, R21 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a medication error rate of less than 5% for 2 of 5 residents (R44 and R59) observed for medication administration, resulting in a medication error rate of 6.8% (2 errors from 29 opportunities). Findings include: A review of R59's admission Record, dated 10/17/23, revealed R59 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R59's admission Record revealed multiple diagnoses that included diabetes. During an observation on 10/16/23 at 07:50 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B administered multiple medications to R59, including 20 units of Humalog (insulin lispro- a short-acting insulin) from an insulin pen. Prior to the administration of the Humalog to R59, LPN B did not prime the insulin needle on the Humalog insulin pen to ensure there was not any air in the needle. LPN B just dialed in 20 (20 units) on the pen and administered the insulin. During an interview on 10/17/23 at 08:29 AM, LPN C stated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain complete and accurate medical records for 4 residents (R21, R33, R59, and R62), resulting in incomplete and inaccurate medical records and the potential for providers not having an accurate and complete picture of the resident's stay at the facility. Findings include: Resident #33 (R33) A review of R33's admission Record, dated 10/16/23, revealed R33 was a [AGE] year-old resident admitted to the facility on [DATE]. In addition, R33's admission Record revealed multiple diagnoses that included mild intellectual disabilities. A review of R33's Minimum Data Set (MDS) (a tool used for assessing a resident's care needs), dated 7/26/23, revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) (a scale used to determine a resident's cognitive status) score of 15 which revealed R33 was cognitively intact. A review of R33's Pharmacist Medication Regimen Review forms, dated 8/1/22 to 10/17/23, revealed the pharmacist had prepared a report for any noted…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- No harm found · C2026-01-14 · tag F0577 — widespreadAllow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure surveys conducted by Federal or State surveyors and any plan of corrections in effect for the past 3 years was readily accessible to residents, family members and legal representatives of residents.Findings include:On 1/14/26 at 11:35 AM, a survey binder was observed located near the front door and did not have any Federal or State Surveys for the year 2025. In an interview on 1/14/25 at 1:58 PM, the Regional Nurse Consultant (RNC) reported the survey binder should have the last 3 years of surveys in it and acknowledged they were not in there.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
No federal fines in the current CMS record.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.4 | -0.4 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OM HOLDCO 7 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 07/01/2025 |
| PAAR 108 LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2017 IRREVOCABLE TRUST F/B/O AARNA R. PATEL | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2017 IRREVOCABLE TRUST F/B/O ANSH R. PATEL | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2020 IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST UAD 10-6-2020 | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| RAJAN G PATEL 2020 IRR FAM TR UAD 12-3-2020 | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| PATEL, RAJAN | Individual | MANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; CORPORATE DIRECTOR | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| OPTUM MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS. INC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| SHARON, ROBERT | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| SOLAREWICZ, MACIEJ | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| STEVENSON, HEAVEN | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| ZUNIGA, TRISHA | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| 1061 W HACKLEY AVE PROPCO LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| SCHLAUPITZ MADHAVAN | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER INC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| WELLTOWER OP, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
| CONNER, MARIANNE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
12 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $963K paid to related parties (affiliated landlords or management companies) in its most recent cost report. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235004. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.