Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Sterling Heig
38200 Schoenherr Road, Sterling Heights, MI 48312 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 163 certified beds · (586) 274-9044 Medicare & Medicaid certified
The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.
- it has 2 actual-harm citations
- a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $4,233 in federal fines (most recent 2023-10-17)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (58%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 3 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 5 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 13.0% | 10.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 1.0% | 5.4% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 1.0% | 0.8% | 0.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 2.8% | 1.5% | 2.0% | worse |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 5.4% | 4.3% | 6.5% | better |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.1% | 0.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.8% | 3.0% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 21.6% | 12.0% | 16.1% | worse |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 18.5% | 19.4% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 86.0% | 95.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.8% | 5.1% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 33.1% | 20.0% | 21.2% | worse |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 19.7% | 14.8% | 17.1% | worse |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.6% | 1.1% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 85.1% | 79.5% | 79.4% | typical |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.7% | 24.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 5.8% | 11.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.10 | 1.84 | 1.67 | better |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.48 | 1.64 | 1.80 | better |
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
62.2% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 497 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 66.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 286 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.55 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 85% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 44% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 62.2%CMS range 57.2–67.3 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | better than U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 12.1%CMS range 9.6–15.2 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 66.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 61.9% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 60.8% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 99.8% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | 96.7% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.5% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 2.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 8.6%CMS range 6.3–10.9 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 0.90 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 163 beds and averages 153.0 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 10 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.99 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.58 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.80 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.61 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.14 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.72 to 0.24 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 58% is well above the national median of 45%.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2026-01-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2719896Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide two-person assistance with bed mobility for one resident (R701) out of three reviewed for falls, resulting in a right leg femur fracture requiring surgery. Findings include:1/21/2026 at 11:00 AM, R701 was observed lying in bed. R701 was noted to have a right leg immobilizer in place, as well as a perimeter mattress. R701 was noted to be sleeping.A review of the medical record revealed R701 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following medical diagnoses, Cervical Fracture and Muscle Wasting and Atrophy. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental status (BIMS) score of 3/15, indicating an impaired cognition. R701 was dependent on staff for bed mobility on an MDS assessment dated [DATE].A review of an Incident and Accident (IA) report dated 12/31/2025 noted the following, Description: Writer did head to toe assessment,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient practice #1. This citation pertains to Intake MI00134465. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately assess and monitor a skin alteration for one resident (R283) of two reviewed for quality of care, resulting in an unmonitored infection, gangrene, and ultimately, amputation of the right great toe. Findings include: A complaint filed to the State Agency was reviewed and included the following: .On 01/25/23 a podiatrist came to clip [R283's] toe nails. He had an ingrown toe nail that was infected on his right foot, big toe. Antibiotic cream was use (sic) and a dressing applied. On 02/04/23 the resident's [family] visited .[R283's] big toe was blue and dark black .On 02/08/23 the resident had his big toe amputated because he had gangrene. A review of R283's record revealed that the resident was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 2/5/23. A review of R283's Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-21 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolatedEnsure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to intake: 2716778Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to initiate psychiatry services for one resident (R700) out of one reviewed for behaviors. Findings include:A review of the medical record revealed R700 was admitted into the facility on 9/7/2024 with the following medical diagnoses, Alzheimer's Disease, restlessness and agitation. A review of the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 0/15 indicating a severely impaired cognition. R700 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers.Further review of the current physician's orders revealed the following, Olanzapine Oral Tablet 5 MG (Milligrams).Give one tablet by mouth every 12 hours for Anti-Psychotic. Start date: 9/7/2024 Psych (Psychiatric) consult. Start Date: 9/9/2024. Psych consult r/t (related to) aggression towards staff. Throwing water at staff and refusing care. Start date:10/13/2024Further review of the medical record revealed a consent to receive psychiatric services dated 12/12/2024, 3 months…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: 2574739Based on observation, interview, record review facility failed to implement interventions (alternating pressure mattress) as ordered to prevent worsening of pressure ulcer for one (R901) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcer prevention/management. Findings include:R901R901 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] for skilled rehabilitation and nursing care. R 901 was readmitted to hospital on [DATE] and returned to the facility on 7/24/25. R901's diagnoses included stroke with right side weakness, heart failure, stage 4 pressure ulcer (full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon, or muscle) of the sacrum (a triangular bone at the base of your spine, located between your two hip bones) and aphasia (language disorder that affects a person's ability to communicate) and wound debridement while they were at the hospital. R901 was receiving nutrition through Percutaneous Endoscopic Gastrostomy (PEG) tube (A soft, flexible tube inserted through the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 6/23/25 between 8:30 AM-9:15 AM, during an initial observation of the kitchen with Dietary Manager (DM) B, the following observations were made: There was a buildup of a black, mold-like substance on the backsplash located on the soiled side of the dish machine, and the faucet assembly for the hose sprayer was continuously leaking water. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 6-501.12 Cleaning, Frequency and Restrictions, (A) Physical facilities shall be cleaned as often as necessary to keep them clean. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 5-205.15 System Maintained in Good Repair, A plumbing system shall be: (A) Repaired according to law; P and (B) Maintained in good repair. In the walk-in cooler, there was an opened, undated 1 gallon container of ranch dressing and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-25 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — widespreadDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the exterior trash refuse area in a clean manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, staff, and visitors. Findings include: On 6/23/25 at 9:10 AM, the exterior dumpster area was observed. The ground surrounding both dumpsters was observed to be soiled with grease and sludge, and there was a milky liquid pooled on the ground. In addition, there was a foul, sour odor in the dumpster vicinity. Dietary Manager B stated Maintenance was responsible for cleaning the dumpster area. On 6/23/25 at 1:30 PM, Maintenance Supervisor S was queried about the dumpster area, and stated that they try to clean it monthly. Maintenance Supervisor S stated, It's probably due for cleaning again. According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 5-501.115 Maintaining Refuse Areas and Enclosures, A storage area and enclosure for refuse, recyclables, or returnables shall be maintained free of unnecessary items, as specified under § 6-501.114, and clean.
- Potential for harm · F2025-06-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practice statements. Deficient Practice #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among any or all the residents in the facility. Findings include: Review of the facility's Water Management Program Plan (WMPP) updated 4/29/23 noted: Each facility must establish a Water Management Team. The Team is responsible for implementing policies and procedures presented in this WMPP including: .Implement water management policies and procedures .monitor and document performance improvement .review elements of the water management program at least annually . The team consists of the following: Facility Administrator, Maintenance Director,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-06-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — patternEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY On 6/24/25 at 2:12 PM, five of the 14 residents that attended the group reported the food did not taste good. They went on to say the food is sometimes cold when it reaches them. A review of the facility's policy titled Food Palatability dated 4/4/25 noted, Food is prepared by methods that conserve nutritive values, flavor, and appearance. Food and drink should be palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature for the general population This citation pertains to Intake: MI00153364 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that food was served in a palatable manner and at the preferred temperature for four residents (R31, R33, R51, R95) and five confidential group residents of twenty reviewed for food palatability. Findings include: R31 On 6/23/25 at 10:26 AM, R31 was interviewed regarding the care and services they were receiving at the facility. R31 indicated the food didn't taste good and was frequently cold when served to them. A review of R31's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A review of the record for R152 revealed R152 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Non traumatic Brain Dysfunction, Stroke and High Blood Pressure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition, impaired range of motion of the extremities, and R152 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including bed mobility, bathing and personal hygiene. A review of the policy, Care Plan - Comprehensive and Revision, revised 8/25/2023, revealed, A comprehensive, person-centered care plan that includes measurable objectives and timetables to meet the resident's physical, psychosocial, and functional needs is developed and implemented for each resident .Assessments of residents are ongoing and care plans are revised as information about the residents and the resident's conditions change. The IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) reviews and updates the care plan when there has been a significant change in the resident's condition . Based on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY A review of the record for R152 revealed R152 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Non traumatic Brain Dysfunction, Stroke and High Blood Pressure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated severely impaired cognition, impaired range of motion of the extremities, and R152 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including bed mobility, bathing and personal hygiene. Resident #57 On 06/23/25 at 9:01 AM, R57 was observed to be supine in bed, with their heels on the bed, and and dressed in a hospital style gown. R57's breakfast tray was observed on the over bed table which was over the waist area of R57. R57 had not eaten or drank any items. The mighty shake (for calorie/nutrition assistance) was not opened. The call light was in the top drawer of the night stand away from R57. On 06/23/25 R57 was not observed to be out of bed during the hours of the survey. On 06/24/25 at 8:16 AM, R57 was observed to be laying on their back (supine) in bed. The head of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide appropriate and meaningful activities for two (R57 and R152) of three residents reviewed for activites. Findings include: R57 On 06/23/25, 06/24/25, and 06/25/25 during the hours of 9:00 am and 4:00 PM, R57 was observed to be in bed in their room. The TV was not on nor was there any device observed to play music. A review of the record for R57 revealed R57 was admitted into the facility 03/19/2025. Diagnoses included Alzheimer's Anxiety and Depression. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] documented severely impaired cognition and the need for assistance with all activities of daily living and was dependent or required maximal assistance for all except eating. Section F: Preference for Customary Routine and Activities documented it was very important or somewhat important for R57 to choose what to wear, listen to music, keep up on the news, do things with groups of people, go outside, do favorite activities . A review…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide gynecological care in a timely manner for one resident (R25) of one reviewed for a delay in treatment. Findings include: On 6/23/25 at 10:39 AM, R25 explained since June 2024, they had been having post-menopause vaginal bleeding and was unable to be seen by a gynecologist until May 2025, in which they were ultimately diagnosed with uterine and cervical cancer. R25 explained the facility nurse practitioner initially thought they had a urinary tract infection however, after the results came back negative, nothing more was done to further investigate the cause of the bleeding. R25 explained the vaginal bleeding would become heavy and at times become painful. R25 explained they were provided with menstrual pads. R25 also explained there had also been issues related to transportation resulting in missed appointments. A review of R25's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 7/7/2017 with diagnoses which included Paraplegia,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 31 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to prevent a fall for one resident (R143) of four residents reviewed for falls resulting in pain. Findings include: On 6/23/25 at 9:28 AM, R143 was observed in bed, unable to move their right arm. R143 was asked about their care in the facility and explained they've had concerns regarding transfers and bed mobility as they recently sustained a fall. A review of R143's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 4/18/25 with diagnoses which included, nontraumatic intracerebral hemorrhage in brain stem, Diabetes, and Heart Failure. Further review revealed the resident was cognitively intact and required 1-2 person assist with transfers, bed mobility, and grooming. Further review of the medical record revealed the following progress notes: 6/11/2025 21:21 (9:21pm) . Note Text: Resident is A&Ox3-4. (alert and oriented to person, place, and time) Assist x1-2 (persons) with adl's (activities of daily living), bed mobility, and transfers. Incont (incontinent) of bowel and bladder with incontinence…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to label, date, and provide tube feeding (nutrition infused directly into the stomach via a tube) as ordered for one resident (R152) of three residents reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: A review of the record for R152 revealed R152 was admitted into the facility on [DATE]. Diagnoses which included Non traumatic Brain Dysfunction, Stroke and High Blood Pressure. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], indicated severely inmpaired cognition, impaired range of motion of the extremities, and R152 was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living including eating, bed mobility, bathing and personal hygiene. On 06/23/25 at 8:53 AM, 3:45 PM and on 06/24/25 at 8:33 AM, R152's was observed to be in bed with the tube feeding actively running at 40 milliliters(ml) per hour (ml/hr), with the formula bag dated 6/22 5:30 PM. A review of the active Physician's order R152's tube feeding rate revealed the feeding should have…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-06-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident medications were not left at the bedside for one resident (R74) of one resident reviewed for medication storage. Findings include: On 6/23/25 at 3:32 PM, R74 was observed lying in their bed. A medication cup with 2 pills were observed sitting on the resident's overbed table. The resident was asked about the medications and explained they didn't realize they were there, and didn't know how long they had been sitting there. On 6/23/25 at 3:34 PM, during an interview with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) G, assigned nurse to R74, who explained they had gone into the room to provide services to R74's roommate and in doing so provided the medications to the R74. LPN G confirmed they didn't know why the resident hadn't taken them. LPN G then entered R74's room and watched the resident take the medication. LPN G indicated the medications in the medication cup were, Robaxin (muscle relaxer) and (R74's) blood pressure medication because their blood pressure runs high.' A review of R74's medical record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-06-25 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolatedEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the completion of 12-hours of annual in-service trainings of two Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA O and CNA P), of five reviewed for the completion of 12-hours of annual in-service training. Findings include: On 6/25/25 at 8:43 AM, 12-hours of annual in-service training was requested from the facility for CNA O and CNA P. On 6/25/25 at 11:44 AM, the facility provided documentation the 12-hours of annual training was requested from the vendor the facility uses for CNAs that work on an as needed basis and are not hired directly through the facility. A review of a document titled, CNA skills competency checklist was provided for CNA P however, it did not reveal the number of training hours, nor did it reveal that dementia management training and resident abuse prevention was provided. Training documentation for CNA O was not received by the end of the survey. On 6/25/25 at 4:18 PM, In-service Director Q was interviewed regarding training for agency CNAs, and explained the facility has a contract with a vendor that is…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00151526 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure timely assess a pressure ulcer for one resident (R703) out of two reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: A review of the medical record revealed that R703 admitted into the facility on 2/26/2025 with the following medical diagnoses, Severe Protein-Calorie Malnutrition and Urinary Tract Infection. A review of the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status assessment score of 3/15 indicating an impaired cognition. The MDS also did not note any unhealed pressure ulcers/injuries at the time of assessment. R702 also required staff assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the progress notes revealed the following, 2/27/2025 at (4:20 PM) .Wound Rounds Note: WCC (Wound Care Consultant) and WCNP (Wound Care Nurse Practitioner) to room for admission skin assessment during IDT (Interdisciplinary Team) rounds .Skin intact, sacrum with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00147942. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for one resident (R702) of two residents reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the facility's failure to timely change the soiled brief of R702. On 11/13/24 at 1:10 PM, R702 was interviewed in bed and was asked about concerns related to not being changed timely. R702 opened a notepad of written notes that contained dates, and assigned staff for the day, in addition to wait times for care. They explained on 11/10/24, day shift, they had a soiled brief, and was told by their assigned certified nursing assistant (CNA C) they would return to change them however, the resident waited for approximately one hour before they were eventually changed by the CNA. R702 further explained they have experienced issues like this before, and has tried to plan when to have a bowel movement based on the shift, as they have struggled with getting changed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-13 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
This citation pertains to Intake: MI00147856. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to timely implement preventative and effective interventions to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer (wound caused by pressure) for one resident (R701) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the facility's failure to prevent the development of a pressure ulcer for R701. A review of R701's medical record revealed the resident was initially admitted into the facility on 3/14/24 without skin integrity issues, and had diagnoses that included Vascular Dementia, Cerebral Infarction, Dysphagia, and Acute Kidney Disorder. Further review revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and required extensive assistance of two persons for bed mobility, transfers, and toileting. Further review of the medical record revealed R701 was transferred to the hospital on 3/22/24, returning to the facility on 4/4/24 with a Stage II pressure ulcer (partial thickness tissue loss…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-22 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains in part to intakes: MI00146160, MI00146194, MI00146496. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to document and provide Activities of Daily Living for two dependent residents (R902 and R903) of five residents reviewed. Findings include: R902 On 8/22/24 at 10:48 AM, R902 was observed lying in bed and asked about their stay in the facility. R902 explained that they have not been obtaining showers, and when they are provided with bathing, it is only a bed bath. A review of shower documentation for the last 30 days for R902 were reviewed and revealed that the resident received a bed bath on 8/8/24, and a shower on 8/22/24. There was one shower documented as resident refusal however, the remaining dates were marked as Not Applicable. A review of R902's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 4/12/24 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Diabetes, ad Heart Failure. Further review revealed that the resident is significantly cognitively…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food was safely stored and failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 5/14/24 between 8:35 AM-9:25 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) H, the following observations were made: In the walk-in cooler, there were 2 foil covered pans with cooked whole pork roasts dated 5/13. When queried about the pork roasts, CDM H stated they had been cooked sometime last evening and were to be served for dinner on 5/14. The internal temperature of the pork roasts was measured to be between 56-58 degrees Fahrenheit. When queried if staff utilized cooling logs, CDM H stated they do use cooling logs, but was unsure of where the cook had put the log. When asked to see a blank copy of the cooling log utilized by kitchen staff, CDM H looked in the office and on the computer, but stated she couldn't find one. According to the 2017 FDA Food Code section…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0694 — isolatedProvide for the safe, appropriate administration of IV fluids for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to label/date and remove a peripheral intravenous line (PIV) for one resident (R95) out of one reviewed for PIV's. Findings include: On 5/14/2024 at 9:00 AM, R95 was observed laying in bed and eating breakfast. R95 was noted to have an PIV inserted in their left wrist, the dressing was not dated or labeled. An IV pump was also noted to be in the room. R95 stated they were not receiving anything through the PIV and did not know why they still had it in. R95 stated they would like it removed because it was uncomfortable. A review of the medical record revealed that R95 admitted into the facility on 4/26/2024 with the following diagnoses, Parkinson's Disease and Dementia. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition. R95 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the medical record revealed the following progress notes, 5/7/2024 17:24 (5:24 PM) General Progress Note. Note Text: IV to left hand…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-05-16 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to identify and document targeted behaviors, non-pharmacological interventions for behaviors, and monitor side effects of a prescribed psychotropic for one resident (R9) of six residents reviewed for unnecessary medications. Findings include: On 05/14/24 at 8:45 AM, R9 was observed lying on their back in bed asleep. A review of R9's medical record revealed they were admitted into the facility on 4/27/24 with diagnoses that included Cerebral Infarction, Adjustment Disorder with mixed disturbance of emotions and conduct, Diabetes Type II, and Hypertension. Further review revealed the resident was severely cognitively impaired and required one person assistance for bed mobility and transfers. On 5/15/24 at 9:05 AM, R9 was observed in bed asleep. On 5/15/24 at 10:06 AM, R9 was observed in bed asleep. Their breakfast food tray was observed on their overhead table untouched. On 5/15/24 at 12:15 PM, R9 was observed still in bed asleep. Their lunch tray at the bedside. On 5/15/24 at 1:55 PM, R9 was observed still in bed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-16 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Deficient Practice Statement #2 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to monitor the temperatures of one of one medication refrigerator that stored drugs and biologicals. Findings include: On 5/16/24 at 8:12 AM, the One [NAME] Unit medication refrigerator located in the medication storage unit was viewed with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN B), and was asked about the process for checking and documenting refrigerator temperatures. LPN B explained that the day shift nurse is responsible for completing the temperature log on the day shift, and the afternoon nurse is responsible for its completion on the afternoon shift. A review of the Medication/Vaccine Refrigerator Temperature Log revealed the following, .Store medications in accordance with manufacturer's specifications, state requirements and standards of practice . A review of the February 2024 temperature log revealed incomplete documentation for the following dates on both shifts: 2/7/24, 2/11/24 , 2/12/24, 2/13/24, 2/14/24, 2/15/24, and 2/24/24. A review of the March 2024 temperature log…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0551 — isolatedGive the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00142524. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to involve the guardian in the plan of care for one resident (R807) out of one reviewed for resident/representative rights. Findings Include: A review of an Intake called inot the State Agency revealed the following, [Guardians] have given [facility] their guardianship court papers twice but they have not returned any calls. [Facility] also made a doctor appointment and transported [R807] to the appointment without the guardian's permission. [R807] is supposed to be discharged on 2/2/2023 and will be taken home but [guardian] has yet to hear from [facility] about this upcoming discharge. A review of the medical record revealed that R807 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Acute Osteomyelitis, Right Ankle and Foot, and Dysphagia. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition. R807 also required…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-03-21 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00142524. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to properly provide a Notice of Medicare Non-Coverage (NOMNC) to the guardian of one resident (R807) out of one reviewed for NOMNC's. Findings Include: A review of an intake called inot the State Agency revealed the following, [R807] is supposed to be discharged on 2/2/2023 and will be taken home but [guardian] has yet to hear from [facility] about this upcoming discharge. A review of the medical record revealed that R807 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Acute Osteomyelitis, Right Ankle and Foot, and Dysphagia. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition. R807 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. The face sheet also noted that R807 had two guardians. Further review of the progress notes revealed the following, Effective Date:2/2/2024 at 5:00 PM .Writer called…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-21 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00141267, MI00142762, and MI00143006. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete wound care treatments for one resident (R801) out of three reviewed for wound care. Findings include: A review of an Intake called into the State Agency noted the following, Continual inadequate care. Wound to be cleaned two times per day per doctors' orders-only happens once per day. A review of the medical record revealed that R801 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Fistula of Intestine and Dysphagia. A review of the Minimum Data Assessment set revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition. R801 also required assistance with bed mobility and transfers. A review of the physician's orders revealed the following orders, Order: Change Colostomy every 3 days. Directions: Every day shift every Monday and Thursday for monitoring. Order: Cleanse Abdominal Wound with Normal Saline, pat dry, and apply…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00142280. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident was weighed and documented weekly for one resident (R901) of three whose weights were reviewed resulting in dietitian recommendations and physician orders not followed. Findings include: A review of the facility record for R901 revealed, R901 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Protein Calorie Malnutrition, Muscle Wasting and Atrophy and Colon Cancer. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition with 14/15 Brief Interview for Mental Status score, impairment of an upper extremity on one side and was dependent (helper does all the effort) for toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, rolling left to right, sitting to lying, lying to sitting, sitting to standing and transfer. Substantial to maximal assistance was required for upper body dressing. Eating required supervision and or set up. A…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-25 · tag F0825 — isolatedProvide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00142280. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure physical rehabilitation services were provided as ordered and scheduled for one resident (R901) of three whose rehab services were reviewed. Findings include: A review of the facility record for R901 revealed, R901 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged to the hospital on [DATE]. Diagnoses included Muscle Wasting and Atrophy, Sarcopenia (age related loss of muscle mass) and Colon Cancer. A review of the care plan dated 12/23/23 documented a ADL (activities of daily living) self care deficit as evidenced by impaired strength realted to weakness. The Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] indicated intact cognition with 14/15 Brief Interview for Mental Status score, impairment of an upper extremity on one side and was dependent (helper does all the effort) for toileting hygiene, bathing, lower body dressing, rolling left to right, sitting to lying, lying to sitting, sitting to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-11-27 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intakes MI00140458 and MI00141009. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assist with care in a timely manner for two residents (R702 and R704) out of four reviewed for call light response, resulting in feelings of frustration and delay in care. Findings include: R702 On 11/27/2023 at 10:08 AM, R702 was observed in their room sitting up in their wheelchair. R702 was asked how their day was going and they stated, I want to get back in the bed. R702 was instructed to activate their call light. R702 stated that they hit their light and people will come in and just turn it off. R702 stated that they had also been asking for a piece of paper and pen and people keep saying that they would bring it back, but they never do. At 10:10 AM, R702 call light was answered and turned off. R702 was observed still sitting in their wheelchair. R702 stated that the nurse turned their light off and stated that someone would be back with them. At 10:16 AM, R702 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-27 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow recommendations of no straws, for two residents (R702 and R703) out of two reviewed for person-centered care. Findings Include: R702 On 11/27/2023 at 10:08 AM, R702 was observed in their room sitting up in their wheelchair. Observed on a white board in R702's room there was, No Straws written on it. R702 was observed with a white Styrofoam cup with a straw in it. R702 stated that there was water in the cup. A review of the medical record revealed that R702 admitted into the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses, Fracture of Left Femur and Fall. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 12/15 indicating a moderately impaired cognition. R702 also required two-person extensive assist with bed mobility and transfers. Further review of the physician orders revealed the following, Order Date: 11/17/2023. Status: Active. Diet Type: Mechanical Soft Texture, Thin consistency,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00140118. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's representative of a change in condition for one resident (R901) of one reviewed for notification of changes, resulting in the resident's representative being unaware of significant medical changes, and inability to participate in medical decisions regarding care and treatment. Findings include: A review of R901's medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 3/17/20 with diagnoses that included End Stage Renal Disease, Respiratory Failure, Diabetes and Depression. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed that the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 15/15 indicating an intact cognition, and required extensive assistance with transfers, bed mobility, and toileting. Further review of R901's medical record indicated that they were receiving dialysis treatment on Tuesdays, Thursdays and Saturdays, however treatment was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00139787 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to administer medications as ordered by the physician for one resident (R909) reviewed for medication administration resulting in medication not given as prescribed, with the potential for adverse side effects. Findings include: A review of the Intake revealed the following, My [spouse] was admitted to [facility] in August .the first few days they had given [R909] the wrong dose of [their]seizure medications which I believe caused a lot of his falls, and decline . A review of R909's closed medical record revealed that they were admitted into the facility on 8/24/23 with diagnoses that included Dementia, Depression, Dysphagia, and Repeated Falls. Further review of R909's medical record revealed that the resident was severely cognitively impaired, and required extensive assistance with bed mobility, transfers, and toilet use. Further review of R909's medical record revealed a medication list indicating the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-08 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed accurately document the services of a Registered Nurse (RN) for at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week, resulting in the potential for inadequate coordination of care and negative clinical outcomes, potentially affecting all 107 residents currently residing in the facility. Findings include: On 3/8/23 at 8:10 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) provided daily staff postings and explained that due to a staffing change, they were still looking for additional postings. A review of the postings that were available revealed the following: October 2022: No RN coverage noted. November 2022: No RN coverage noted. December 2022: 12/8, 7 hours of RN coverage. January 2023: No RN coverage. On 3/8/23 at 11:00 AM, the Nursing Home Administrtor (NHA) and DON (Director of Nursing) were queried regarding multiple months of staff postings with no RN coverage noted, and they stated that this was incorrect, which they became aware of when they obtained a 1 star staffing rating (star rating system which rates 1 star and low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-08 · tag F0732 — widespreadPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to display current nurse staffing information daily, and failed to maintain 18 months of daily staff postings, affecting all 107 facility residents, resulting in the likelihood of necessary staffing information not being available to residents and visitors. Findings include: On 3/6/23 on 12/10 PM, a daily staff positing was observed posted, and dated for 1/31/23. On 3/8/23 at 8:10 AM, the Nursing Home Administrator (NHA) provided daily staff postings and explained that due to a staffing change, they were still looking for additional postings. A review of the postings revealed the following: February 2022: Daily Staff postings were provided for 2/8, 2/9, 2/10 and 2/11. March 2022, missing the following dates: 3/1, 3/2, 3/3, 3/4, 3/5, 3/6, 3/7, 3/8, 3/9, 3/10, 3/12, 3/13, 3/18, 3/19, 3/20, 3/25 3/26 and 3/27. April 2022, missing the following dates: 4/2, 4/3, 4/9, 4/10, 4/12, 4/14, 4/15, 4/16, 4/17, 4/23, 4/24, 4/25, 4/26, 4/27, 4/28, 4/29, and 4/30. May 2022: No postings provided. June 2022: No postings provided.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure food items were dated, failed to ensure staff with facial hair donned beard restraints, and failed to maintain kitchen equipment in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 3/6/23 between 9:00 AM-9:45 AM, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Chef Y, the following items were observed: In the walk-in cooler, there was an undated container of sliced tomatoes, an undated container of soup, and an undated container of chopped lettuce. In addition, there were 2 one pound containers of opened, undated sour cream, with a manufacturer's best by date of 3/5. In the Hoshizaki reach-in cooler, there were 2 undated bowls of soup. According to 2017 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17: Ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-03-08 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — widespreadMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary conditions in the kitchen to eliminate the harborage of gnats. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include: On 3/6/23 at approximately 9:30 AM, the kitchen was observed with Chef Y. It was observed that there was an accumulation of dried on food debris, crumbs and grease on kitchen equipment, carts and floors. In addition, there were numerous gnats observed throughout the kitchen. When queried, Chef Y stated that they have been short staffed in the kitchen, and that he is new to the kitchen and trying to get things in order. Review of the pest control service reports for the facility revealed the following: 2/28/23 Poor floor sweeping- the gnats issue is a sanitation problem. The floors in kitchen have grease, food, and other substances gunk causing problem, regular mopping and cleaning of floors will eliminate the problem .Dirty equipment- tables and sinks dirty with old food. 1/24/23 Poor floor sweeping- the gnats issue is a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0557 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to be treated with respect and dignity and to retain and use personal possessions.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident personal belongings were accounted for, affecting one sampled Resident (R121), resulting in missing personal items, the potential for further missing/unaccounted for items, and resident/family dissatisfaction. Findings include: On 3/6/23 at 2:33 PM, an interview was completed with R121 and Family Member A. They explained that upon admission into the facility, they brought in a suitcase and a duffle bag full of clothing, including a winter coat, and designer slippers however, none of those items can be located. They further explained that it has been approximately six weeks since their concerns have been brought to the facility, and they have yet to hear anything about their concerns. At this time, Family member A provided a copy of the inventory sheet R121 completed upon admission. A review of the Inventory of Personal Effects listed the following items: 1 coat 1 dress 2 house coat/robe 2 overnight case/luggage 1 shoes (pair) 5 slacks 1 slippers (pair) 9 socks (pair) 5 sweaters 4…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to pass medications in a timely manner and per physician's orders and standards of practice affecting two residents (R41 and R40), resulting in resident dissatisfaction, and the potential for adverse effects. Findings include: On [DATE] at 8:51 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K (agency nurse) was seen on the east wing at Cart #1 passing medications. LPN K was observed to have a wireless headphone bud in her right ear. LPN K indicated that R41 would be the next resident for medication pass. On [DATE] at 9:00 AM, LPN K returned to the medication cart and no longer had the headphone bud in her ear. LPN K removed a cup of pills from one of the middle drawers on the cart and indicated she had already pulled R41's medications, but that the resident had left his room to go get some sugar so she stored them in the cart. The medication cup was not labeled with any identifying information as to whose pills were in it. R41's scheduled morning…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake: MI00134600 and MI00134043. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers as scheduled for two residents (R40, and R75) and a bed pan for one resident (R24) out of ten reviewed for Activities of Daily Living (ADL's), resulting in dissatisfaction with care and fustration. Findings include: Resident 24 (R24) On 3/6/2023 at 10:30, R24 call light appeared to be activated. R24 stated that they were waiting to be put on the bed pan and that it usually takes a while for someone to come answer their light. R24 stated that their light had already been on 15 minutes prior to surveyor entering room. At 10:40 AM, a certified nursing assistant (CNA) was observed walking past the light. At 10:45 AM, multiple staff were observed sitting at the nurse's station on the unit. At 11:05, the nurse from the other hallway came and answered R24's call light and getting a CNA to enter the room and answer the light. A review of the medical record revealed that…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to apply a splint to one resident (R75) out of one reviewed for limited range of motion, resulting in the potential for the worsening of a contracture. Findings include: On 3/7/2023 at 1:06 PM, an interview was conducted with R75 regarding their stay in the facility. R75 stated that they can roll on their right side. R75 right hand appeared to be contracted. R75 was asked if they had a splint for their right hand. R75 stated that they had a splint but haven't had one in over a year. A review of the medical record revealed R75 admitted into the facility on 3/5/2021 with the following diagnoses, Idiopathic Peripheral Autonomic Neuropathy and Atrial Fibrillation. A review of the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE] revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status score of 14/15 indicating an intact cognition. R75also required extensive one person assist with bed mobility and transfers. A review of the physician orders revealed the following,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-08 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store medications per professional standards during medication administration, and failed to label/date insulin pens in two of four medication carts, resulting in the potential for medication error. Findings include: On [DATE] at 8:51 AM, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) K (agency nurse) was seen on the east wing at Cart #1 passing medications. LPN K was observed to have a wireless headphone bud in her right ear. LPN K indicated that R41 would be the next resident for medication pass. On [DATE] at 9:00 AM, LPN K returned to the medication cart and no longer had the headphone bud in her ear. LPN K removed a cup of pills from one of the middle drawers on the cart and indicated she had already pulled R41's medications, but that the resident had left his room to go get some sugar so she stored them in the cart. The medication cup was not labeled with any identifying information as to whose pills were in it. R41's scheduled morning medications…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-03-08 · tag F0887 — isolatedEducate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to completely and accurately document current COVID-19 vaccination status and offer the vaccine/booster if eligible for four residents (R28, R38, R51, R114) of nine reviewed for immunizations, resulting in the potential for miscommunication and misunderstanding of resident immunization preferences, and the potential for the development of severe disease if infected with COVID-19 (highly contagious respiratory virus). Findings include: On 3/7/23 at 2:22 PM, a review of the infection control task was initiated with Infection Preventionist (IP). At this time, record review was conducted with the IP for R28 and their immunizations. R28 was noted to have been admitted into the facility on 2/14/23 but complete information regarding the resident's COVID vaccination status was not found in the medical record. The IP looked up the resident in [State of Michigan online immunization database] and indicated there was no COVID immunization information present. The IP then reviewed R28's medical record for a COVID vaccination screening…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$4,233 in federal fines across 1 penalty.
- $4,233 — penalty dated 2023-10-17
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 1.9 | +0.1 vs chain |
| Staffing | 3 of 5 | 2.4 | +0.6 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OM HOLDCO 5 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 100% | since 04/07/2023 |
| OPTALIS LP INVESTORS 5 LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 10% | since 04/07/2023 |
| SNW LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | 30% | since 04/07/2023 |
| BANDUR, KEVIN CHARLES | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| CHARLES FRANKLIN LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2025 |
| CHARLES WESTLAND LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2025 |
| CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLP | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| FORBRIGHT BANK | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/26/2026 |
| HEMANT SHAH 2018 IRREVOCABLE TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2025 |
| OBS OF MI LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2025 |
| PAAR 108 LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2025 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2017 IRREVOCABLE TRUST F/B/O AARNA R. PATEL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2025 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2017 IRREVOCABLE TRUST F/B/O ANSH R. PATEL | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2025 |
| PINAL R. PATEL 2020 IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST UAD 10-6-2020 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2025 |
| RAJAN G PATEL 2020 IRR FAM TR UAD 12-3-2020 | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/30/2025 |
| SCHLAUPITZ MADHAVAN | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2025 |
| KENNY, CARRIE ANN | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2025 |
| PARKER, SETH | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/01/2025 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 22 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.
15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
This home reported $2.1M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 16% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MI
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235665. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-06-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.