No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Evergreen Health and Rehabilitation Center

19933 West Thirteen Mile Road, Southfield, MI 48076 · For profit - Corporation · 172 certified beds · (248) 203-9000 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (248) 203-9000 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Dec 20245 actual-harm citations$28,815 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Dec 2024
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has 5 actual-harm citations
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (61) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $28,815 in federal fines (most recent 2024-03-14)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • about 27% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

3/5
CMS overall
3 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 5 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
28235 Southfield Rd · (248) 996-9214 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
28500 Southfield Rd Ste 300 · (248) 559-9901 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
Kroger0.5 mi
19855 W 12 Mile Rd · (248) 559-9829 · Call to confirm hours
Park
27400 Southfield Rd · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 5 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 5 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 2 to 3 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating3★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased9.2%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.8%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.8%1.5%2.0%typical
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms1.8%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.2%3.0%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened15.2%12.0%16.1%typical
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication12.9%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.5%5.1%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control14.4%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.2%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication0.4%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.4%79.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.0%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.1%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.501.841.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days0.911.641.80better

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

62.7% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — CMS rates that better than the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 666 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

62.7%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
12.0%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
65.9%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.53U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.22hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.25hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.05hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 65.9% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 226 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.53 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 84% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 62% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy at close to weekday levels right through the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF62.7%CMS range 58.5–67.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024better than U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF12.0%CMS range 9.9–13.910.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge65.9%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge61.5%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge63.7%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified99.1%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting98.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.6%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened1.5%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.5%CMS range 4.0–7.37.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.931.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.46
RN hours/ resident / day
1.48
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.97
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.91
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.20
RN hoursweekends
46.0%
Total nursing turnover
39.1%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 172 beds and averages 156.7 residents a day — about 91% occupied, or roughly 15 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.91 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.46 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.97 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.41 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 4.12 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.57 to 0.20 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 1 administrator has left in the past year.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

6
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-09-11)
13
at the previous standard inspection (2024-08-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

61 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 46 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00150988. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to thoroughly evaluate and timely address a foot injury for one (R802) of one resident reviewed for a change in condition, resulting in a delay in diagnosing and treating a moderately comminuted avulsion fracture (bone broken in multiple places) to the resident's heel (calcaneus), increased pain, and the inability to fully participate in physical rehabilitation. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that the resident sustained an injury to her foot in the facility. On 4/8/25, an unannounced onsite investigation was conducted. A review of R802's clinical record revealed R802 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and discharged on 10/25/24 with diagnoses that included: orthostatic hypotension and syncope and collapse. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R802 had intact cognition, received scheduled pain…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00142846. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure staff timely identified a worsening of condition and communicated a change of condition with the nursing staff and physician staff for one (R801) of three residents reviewed for a change of condition. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the facility to have failed to assess a change of condition with R801 in a timely manner. Review of the medical record revealed R801 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: malignant neoplasm of cervix, abscess of vulva and acute kidney failure. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition and required staff assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of a Physician Team - Discharge Note dated 11/17/23 at 1:33 PM, documented in part . Notified by staff that was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake(s): MI0014286, MI00143149, MI00142861 & MI00143213. Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure pressure wounds were identified (R801), assessed and monitored by physicians/wound clinicians consistently if at all (R's 801 & 804) , implement effective treatment for identified wounds timely (R803), implement preventive interventions (R802) for four (R's 801, 802, 803 & 804) of four residents reviewed for wounds, resulting in R801 to have developed an unstageable (full-thickness skin and tissue loss in which the extent of tissue damage within the ulcer cannot be confirmed because the wound bed is obscured by slough or eschar) coccyx/sacrum wound, R802 to have developed a Deep Tissue Injury (DTI- Intact skin with localized area of persistent non-blanchable deep red, maroon, purple discoloration due to damage of underlying soft tissue), R803 to have developed a Stage III (Full-thickness loss of skin, in which subcutaneous fat may be visible in the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00135548 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to initiate necessary treatments for one (R155) of seven resident's reviewed for pressure ulcers, resulting in the worsening of a pressure wound to the spine. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged R155 did not receive proper wound treatment for their pressure sores. The complainant reported that the resident was discharge from the facility on or about 2/16/23 and ended up in the hospital on 2/21/23 with unstageable wounds. A review of R155's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: non-displaced fracture of the right femur A review of the resident's Minimum Data Set (MDS) noted the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15 (cognitively intact) and required extensive one to two person assist for most Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Continued review of R155's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00134725 Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to timely review abnormal lab results for one (R58) out of four residents reviewed for Urinary Tract Infection (UTI) resulting in a delay in treatment for a UTI and hospitilization. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged R58 had a UTI (urinary tract infection) that was left untreated resulting in R58 being sent to the hospital on 1/29/23 after they were observed with a change in mental status. On 6/27/23 at approximately 10:45 AM, R58 was observed lying in bed. The resident was alert but not able to answer most questions asked including a history of UTI(s) or Hospitalization. The resident expressed that they were in pain but were not able to activate their call light with their hand. A nurse was asked to come assist the resident. A review of R58's clinical record noted the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-04-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2809647.Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to conduct a thorough investigation for a staff to resident abuse allegation and failed to protect the alleged victim (resident) while the investigation was conducted for one (R303) of three residents reviewed for abuse. Findings include:A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency (SA) on 3/17/26 at 12:46 AM, documented in part . Resident told a staff member that over the weekend they were abused by someone. Immediately the administrator was notified a statement was collected from which the resident identified a staff member that was immediately suspended pending investigation. Nursing Supervisor conducted a skin assessment on residence no concerns were noted. Increased supervision was instituted for the resident's assuring safety throughout the night. Resident stated they feel safe at center, and no psychosocial conditions noted.A review of the investigation summary…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake(s): 2966229 & 2803135.Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to complete Braden assessments per the facility policy, failed to accurately/timely implement wound orders and failed to ensure timely reporting of abnormal changes to wounds for two (R's 304 & 305) of three residents reviewed for pressure wounds. Findings include:R304A review of a complaint submitted to the SA documented a concern of a wound to have developed while inpatient at the facility.A review of the medical record revealed that R304 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: a closed fracture and repeated falls. R304 was dependent on staff assistance for all activity of daily living (ADL). The resident was discharged from the facility on 6/26/25.A review of an admission Evaluation dated 5/20/25 at 3:39 PM, documented in part . Clinical Evaluation Integumentary (Skin). Left hip- Pressure- Stage II (partial-thickness loss of skin with exposed dermis). Coccyx- suspected…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to prepare food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. This deficient practice has the potential to result in food borne illness among all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: 09/09/2025 between 9:00 AM-9:30 AM, during an observation of the kitchen with Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) E, the following items were observed: In the walk-in cooler, there were opened, undated containers of ranch dressing, vinegarette dressing, and thousand island dressing. CDM E confirmed the items should have been dated when opened.According to the 2022 FDA Food Code section 3-501.17: Ready-to-eat, potentially hazardous food prepared and held in a food establishment for more than 24 hours shall be clearly marked to indicate the date or day by which the food shall be consumed on the premises, sold, or discarded when held at a temperature of 41 degrees Fahrenheit or less for a maximum of 7 days. Refrigerated, ready-to- eat, potentially hazardous food prepared and packed by a food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure quarterly health care conferences were conducted for one (R154) out of one resident reviewed for care conferences. Findings include:The facility policy titled, Care Conferences (Revised -3/10/25) was reviewed and documented, in part: .Policy: It is the policy of the facility to offer Care Conferences to residents and authorized representatives on admission, quarterly, with significant change condition, and any time the resident and/or authorized representative requests a care conference.The Social Service employee, or assigned designee, will invite the resident and authorized representative to a care conference.The authorized representative may request a join the care conference via phone or virtual method if they are unable to attend in person.A review of R154's clinical record revealed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia with agitation, psychotic disorder with delusions and chronic kidney…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure lidocaine patches were available to administer for one resident (R6) of one resident reviewed for medication administration. Findings include: On 9/10/25 the medical record for R6 was reviewed and revealed the following: R6 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including pain in right leg and Chronic pain. A review of R6's comprehensive plan of care revealed the following: Focus-Risk for impaired comfort r/t (related to): Chronic pain, Resident has breakthrough pain, Dx (diagnosis) Hemiparesis 2/2 (secondary to) CVA (Cardiovascular accident) Date Initiated: 06/21/2024 .Interventions-Administer pain medication as ordered. Monitor for effectiveness. Date Initiated: 06/21/2024 . A Physicians order dated 4/24/25 revealed the following: Lidocaine Max St 24 Hours External Patch 4 % (Lidocaine) Apply to R (right) shoulder topically two times a day for Pain. A second Physicians order dated 7/9/24 revealed the following:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure tube feeding and water flushes for hydration were administered per physician's orders for one resident (R23) of one resident, resulting in the potential for unmet nutrition and hydration needs. Findings include:On 9/9/25 at 9:59 AM, R23 was observed in their bed asleep. A tube feeding pump on a pole was observed at the bedside. There was no tube feeding formula bottle or water bag for hydration on the pole attached to the pump. On 9/9/25 at 11:40 AM, a second observation of R23 was conducted and the tube feeding pump and pole remained with no tube feeding bottle or water for hydration. On 9/9/25 at 11:57 AM, a review of R23's physician's orders for tube feeding was conducted and revealed an order dated 6/28/25 for Jevity 1.5 tube feeding formula to be delivered at 75 mL (milliliters) per hour for 16 hours and a water flush to be delivered at 85 mL an hour for 16 hours. The order further indicated the start time for the feeding formula and water was 8 PM and the stop time was 12 PM the following day. On…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-09-11 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure Physican ordered laboratory (labs) were obtained for one resident (R81) of one resident reviewed for laboratory diagnostics. Findings include:On 09/09/2025 the medical record for R81 was reviewed and revealed the following: R81 was last admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Congestive heart failure and End stage renal disease. A Physician's evaluation dated 8/27/25 revealed the following: CC (chief complaint)- Follow up-Patient seen at bedside today, sitting at the side of the bed. Patient reporting bloating and increased plaque chills with gas, patient also is reporting being unable to tell if she is passing gas or stool, unsure of the patient's having fecal incontinence from history. Patient already on simethicone every 8 hours as needed we will schedule it for a few days and follow up patient also reporting having left hand tingling ever since her left arm procedure, possible nerve impingement, patient reports…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-09-11 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assistive devices for eating were provided to one resident (R17) of 21 residents reviewed for dining. Findings include: On 9/09/2025 at approximately 11:51 a.m., R17 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R17 was observed to have cognitive deficits when conducting initial pool interview and was unable to stay focused during the interview. On 9/10/25 at approximately 9:14 a.m., R17 was observed in their room, attempting to eat the breakfast meal. R17 had approximately one bite gone from their meal. At that time, A review of R17's meal ticket revealed R17 was to be provided built-up utensils with their meal tray. R17 was observed to have been provided standard silverware and no built-up utensils. On 9/10/25 at approximately 9:33 a.m., R17 was still observed in their room, attempting to eat the breakfast meal. R17 was still observed not to have been provided the built-up utensils. On 9/10/25 at approximately 9:47 a.m., R17…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-06 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: 2581302. Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to accurately assess, timely report a change in condition to the Physician and timely transfer to a higher level of care, for one (R404) of three residents reviewed for a change of condition/timely transfer to the hospital. Findings include:A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented in part . resident fell out of his bed at 5am. the facility staff did not evaluate resident and stated that the doctor would see him on Monday. Complainant states it took her until 4 or 5pm Saturday to finally get staff to call the EMS (emergency medical services) and have him sent to (hospital name). Complainant states resident was put in the intensive care unit at hospital with a fractured neck and hematoma in the brain. Complainant states at the time of fall, resident was recovering from a seven hour back surgery.A review of the medical record revealed R404 was admitted to the facility with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-04-08 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00150776. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide timely incontinence care for one (R801) of two residents reviewed for bowel and bladder. Findings include: Review of a complaint filed with the State Agency included allegations that they were not provided with timely incontinence care and were left wet and soiled for approximately 11 hours. On 4/8/25 at 9:30 AM, R801 was observed in bed, asleep. Upon entry, the resident woke up and participated in an interview about their care. R801 reported concerns that they were left over eight hours before they got changed or repositioned. R801 further reported that unless they put their call light on, the staff on midnights don't come in to check or reposition them, they wait for the resident to put the call light on. R801 reported if they aren't changed on midnight shift, then they have to wait until after breakfast. The resident was asked if they had reported these concerns to anyone at the facility and they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 46 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00150187. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a consent for psychotropic medications were obtained from a legally authorized resident representative for one resident (R303) of three residents reviewed for rights of legally authorized representatives. Findings include: On [DATE], a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed with alleged R303 was provided psychotropic medications without the consent of their legally authorized representative (Durable Power of Attorney for healthcare-DPOA-H). On [DATE] the medical record for R303 was reviewed and revealed the following: R303 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Alzheimer's disease, Fall from bed and Cerebral Infarction and had expired on [DATE]. A review of R303's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of [DATE] revealed R303 needed assistance from facility staff with their activities of daily living. R303's BIMS score (brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-02-20 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — isolated
    Make sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00150047 Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow pest control procedures for one resident (R305) of three residents reviewed for pest control. Findings include: On 2/19/25 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed which alleged staff were not utilizing effective procedures to maintain pest control resulting in an infection of bed bugs. On 2/19/25 at 10:03 a.m., during a conservation with Maintenance Director A (MD A), MD A was queried regarding allegation of a bed bug infestation in the facility. MD A reported they did have multiple rooms in where bugs were found and that the facility pest control provider had been out multiple times to inspect and treat the rooms. MD A indicated that the rooms with alleged infestation were 414 and 409. A request for documentation of the bed bug procedures and treatments were requested. On 2/19/25 a review of the facility's investigation into the bed bug infestation revealed the following: Bed Bug…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number MI00147674. Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to protect the resident's right to be free from physical abuse by a resident for one (R803) of four residents reviewed for abuse, resulting in R804 pushing R803 out of their wheelchair. Findings include: A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) submitted to the State Agency (SA) revealed an allegation that R804 pushed R803's wheelchair and R803 fell. On 12/10/24 at 12:40 PM, an interview was conducted with R803. R803 reported he used to be in another room and has had many roommates. R803 was difficult to understand, but said something about not trying to bother anyone. When queried about whether there had been any physical altercations with other residents, R803 reported there was, but did not give additional details and reported his memory was not good. On 12/10/24 at approximately 12:50 PM, R804 was observed seated at the table in the dining room for lunch. A review of R803's clinical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-12-10 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake # MI000148791 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to report allegations of neglect to the Administrator/Abuse Coordinator and to the State Agency (SA) for one (R806) out of four residents reviewed for Abuse/Neglect. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the SA that alleged that on 12/5/24, R806 was observed covered in dry feces over an extended part of their body. The complainant noted that the allegation had been reported to Nurse F and the Director of Nursing (DON) on 12/5/24. The complainant noted that both the Nurse F and the DON indicated that incontinence care was not needed as the resident was dying and it was okay to leave them covered with hardened feces. The Complainant further reported that Unit Manager (UM) D, a family member of R806 was never informed on the incident until after the resident was discharged . A review of R806's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-07 · tag F0563 — failed to protect the right to visitors — widespread
    Honor the resident's right to receive visitors of his or her choosing, at the time of his or her choosing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure unrestricted, 24-hour visitation for residents. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all 143 residents in the facility. Findings include: On 8/6/24 at 10:30 AM, during a resident council meeting with the State Agency, several anonymous residents reported that the facility's visitor hours ended each night at 8:00 PM with the front door being locked at that time, and were announced overhead. Twelve residents were present and each resident reported not knowing that they were allowed to have visitors outside of the hours of 8:00 AM and 8:00 PM. On 8/7/24 at 1:10 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator. When queried what the facility's visitor hours were, they responded 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM with the front door locking at 8:00 PM each day, which is announced overhead. When queried if the residents were aware that they had the right to have visitors outside of the 8:00 AM to 8:00 PM timeframe, the Administrator chose not to speak for what the residents were aware of. The Administrator mentioned…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain the ventilation hood filters in a sanitary manner, failed to ensure the dish machine was sanitizing, and failed to maintain the dish machine in a sanitary manner. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 8/5/24 at 9:30 AM, the cookline hood ventilation filters were observed with a buildup of grease. Certified Dietary Manager (CDM) O stated kitchen staff were responsible for cleaning the hood vent. According to the 2017 FDA (Food and Drug Administration) Food Code Section 4-601.11 Equipment, Food-Contact Surfaces, Nonfood-Contact Surfaces, and Utensils.(C) NonFOOD-CONTACT SURFACES of EQUIPMENT shall be kept free of an accumulation of dust, dirt, FOOD residue, and other debris. On 8/5/24 at 9:40 AM, a plate simulating dishwasher tester was sent through the dish machine to check the sanitizing properties of the facility's high temperature dish machine. The maximum temperature recorded on the plate simulator was noted to be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-07 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide an environment that promoted and enhanced residents' dignity for multiple residents, including three (R42, R73, and R85) of residents reviewed for dignity. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Dignity dated 9/21/23: .Residents will be treated with dignity and respect at all times .Residents' private space and property are respected at all time .Staff are expected to knock and identify themselves before entering residents' rooms .Demeaning practices and standards of care that compromise dignity are prohibited .Staff are expected to treat cognitively impaired residents with dignity and sensitivity . On 8/5/24 from 9:00 AM to 11:30 AM, multiple observations included nursing staff entering the rooms of residents on Anna's Place (a secured unit) without knocking, announcing themselves prior to entering the room, or waiting of acknowledgment from the residents to enter. Additional dignity concerns were observed…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0555 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to choose his or her attending physician.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure choice of an attending physician was honored for one (R288) of three residents reviewed for choices. Findings include: On 8/5/24 at 10:30 AM, R288 was observed lying in bed. A sign announcing Contact Precautions was posted on the door and a isolation cart was observed in the hallway immediately outside R288's room which contained personal protection equipment (PPE) including isolation gowns and gloves. R288 was asked about care at the facility. R288 explained their doctor, Dr. F, had come in the day before, but was touching their PICC (peripherally inserted central catheter) line and the dressing over the wound on their foot without gloves . when they told Dr. F to put on gloves, Dr. F got an attitude about wearing gloves. R288 also explained they had told Dr. F they did not want them as their doctor anymore. Review of the clinical record revealed R288 was admitted into the facility on 7/29/24 with diagnoses that included: diabetes, cellulitis and acute kidney failure. According to a Brief Interview for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0559 — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate notice in a dignified manner of a room change for one (R289) of one resident reviewed for room changes. Findings include: On 8/5/24 at 11:11 AM, R289 was observed lying in a bed different than the room census provided by the facility. R289 was asked about being in that particular room. R289 explained their room had been changed that morning, it was the third room they had been in, and they had only been there four days. Review of the clinical record revealed R289 had been admitted into the facility on 8/1/24 with diagnoses that included: open wound of abdominal wall, prostate cancer and chronic kidney disease. According to a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam dated 8/2/24, R289 scored 13/15 indicating intact cognition. Review of R289's census revealed upon admission, R289 was in room [ROOM NUMBER]. On 8/3/24, R289 was moved to room [ROOM NUMBER], then on 8/5/24 R289 was moved to room [ROOM NUMBER], their…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to execute a Do-Not-Resuscitate (DNR) Advance Directive order for one resident (R128) reviewed of two residents reviewed for Advance Directives. Findings include: Clinical record review revealed R128 was admitted from the hospital to the facility on 7/23/24. R128 required rehabilitation from right toe gangrene (death of body tissue due to lack of blood flow or infection). R128's medical history included diabetes, hypertension, end stage renal disease and required peritoneal dialysis (removal of waste products via the lining inside the belly as a natural filter for blood). A Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS) score totaled 14/15 indicating R128 was cognitively intact. On 7/29/24, a review of the health care conference summary held on 7/29/24 at 2:00 PM documented Advance Directives were reviewed and R128 expressed their choice of DNR code status. The facility documented the DNR form was completed by R128 and awaiting physician signature and order. On 8/6/24 at 12:49 PM, an interview with Corporate Social Services B…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0624 — isolated
    Prepare residents for a safe transfer or discharge from the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a safe and collaborated discharge for one (R29) of three residents reviewed for discharge. Findings include: On 8/5/24 at 9:40 AM, R29 was observed in the bathroom unassisted. R29's spouse was in the room waiting for them to return from the bathroom. R29 stated that they would like a surveyor to return once they were finished getting ready for the day. At 10:00 AM, this surveyor returned to the room, R29 was sitting in the wheel chair with their left leg elevated on the bed. Their spouse was sitting in a chair across the room. R29 was interviewed and asked how was their current stay at the facility, and stated, It has not been good and explained that they were getting discharged today (8/5/24). R29's spouse interjected and stated, Well, we don't know because social work came in and stated that we might not be getting discharged due to a fall (that R29 had that morning around 9:05 AM). R29's spouse explained that the facility called…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-07 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement a baseline care plan for tube feeding was provided to one (R287) of one resident reviewed for tube feeding. Findings include: Review of a facility policy titled, Care Plan - Baseline dated 8/25/23 read in part, .It is the policy of the facility to develop a baseline plan of care to meet the resident's immediate health and safety needs for each resident within forty-eight (48) hours of admission . The baseline care plan includes instructions needed to provide effective, person-centered care of the resident that meet professional standards of quality care and must include the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the resident . On 8/5/24 at 9:54 AM, R287 was observed sleeping in bed. Enteral nutrition (tube feeding) was being delivered via pump. Review of the clinical record revealed R287 was admitted into the facility on 8/3/24 with diagnoses that included: stroke, major depressive disorder and malnutrition. According to a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) exam dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were accurately documented and orders written according to professional standards of practice for two (R27 and R287) residents. Findings include: R27 On 8/6/24 at 8:25 AM, as part of the Medication Administration task, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E was observed to prepare seven medications for R27. LPN E crushed the medications and mixed them with applesauce. LPN E was observed to enter R27's room to give the seven crushed medications to R27. R27 refused to take the medications. LPN E was then observed to leave R27's room with the medications R27 had refused. On 8/6/24 at 9:05 AM, the medications LPN E had prepared were reconciled with R27's physician orders. All seven medications were marked as given by LPN E. On 8/6/24 at 9:15 AM, LPN E was asked if she had gone back and given R27 their medications. LPN E explained she had not. When informed all the medications had been marked as given, LPN E explained she had marked them as done before R27 had refused them. LPN E was asked when should…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has 2 Deficient Practice Statements. Deficient Practice Statement #1 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide wound care for two (R337 and R120) of two residents reviewed for nonpressure related wound care. Findings include: R337 On 8/5/24 at 9:15 AM, R337 was observed lying in bed resting. R337 was asked how their stay at the facility had been. R337 stated that they were in pain and that someone needed to change their wound dressings but they (the facility) had not done so. R337 stated, There is an area on my butt that they have not changed yet. R337 stated that the abdominal wound had started to stink and proceeded to show this surveyor the abdominal wound. There was blood and drainage from the wound that had a mild odor. A record review revealed that R337 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of hyperlipidemia, type two diabetes and mild protein deficit. R337 had a brief interview for mental status score of 15, indicating an intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation interview and record review the facility failed to ensure there were wound care orders placed for one resident (R337) of two residents reviewed for pressure ulcers. Findings include: On 8/5/24 at 9:15 AM, R337 was observed lying in bed rest. R337 was asked how their stay at the facility had been. R337 stated that they were in pain and that someone needed to change their wound dressings but they had not done so yet. R337 stated, There is an area on my butt that they have not changed yet. R337 explained that the abdominal wound had started to stink. R337 proceeded to show the abdominal wound area to this surveyor. There was blood and drainage on the bancage with a mild odor that came from the site. On 8/5/24 at 9:20 AM, the certified nurse aid performed incontinence care for R337. At that time R337's coccyx area was observed. The wound presented with a reddened border and a greenish yellow slough base. There were two dime sized stage two pressure sores on the left gluteal cheek. A record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interview and record review the facility failed assess promptly after a fall for one (R29) resident of reviewed for accidents. Findings include: On 8/5/24 at 9:40 AM, R29 was observed in the bathroom unassisted. R29's spouse was in the room waiting for them to return from the bathroom. R29 stated that they would like this surveyor to return once they were finished getting ready for the day. At 10:00 AM, this surveyor returned to the room, R29 was sitting in the wheel chair with their left leg elevated on the bed and the spouse sitting in a chair across the room. R29 was asked about their stay at the facility and explained that they had fallen that morning (8/5/24). R29 stated that they hurt their leg and they hit their head a little bit because when they fell, they landed on their left side. A record review revealed that R29 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of type two diabetes, repeated falls, and generalized anxiety disorder. R29 had a brief interview for mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure proper infection control protocols and practices including hand hygiene during meals, transmission-based precautions (TBP) regarding use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and room placement for four (R42, R73, R288, and R289) of four residents reviewed for infection control. Findings include: Dining Observation: On 8/5/24 at 1:00 PM, the family member of R42 was observed standing at the end of the table and feeding the R42 by the spoonful. This family member was then observed to state to R73, You look like you haven't had a crumb of food in years, right?. During this time, the family member was observed to touch their clothing, hair, and table multiple times. This family member was then observed to assist R73 and R42 at the same time. There was no use of hand sanitizer or washing of hands by this family member in between assisting the two residents with their lunch meal. Additionally, although nursing staff were present, no one…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-08 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00144802. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe transfer per plan of care (use of a mechanical hoyer lift) and facility policy for one (R901) of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: Review of a complaint filed with the State Agency included allegations that the resident was not transferred with the correct assistance required. On 7/8/24 at 1:28 PM, the facility was requested to provide any incident reports and investigations since R901's admission. Review of the clinical record revealed R901 was admitted into the facility on 5/2/24, discharged on 5/27/24 and had not returned to the facility. Diagnoses included: other specified fracture of right pubis (5/2/24) and morbid obesity due to excess calories (severe). According to R901's care plans and [NAME] since admission, the resident's transfer status was TRANSFER: Resident requires Mechanical Lift with 2 PA (Person Assist). Review of the progress notes included: An entry…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-05-28 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #s MI00143487 and MI00143823. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, safe, and homelike environment, as evidenced by soiled floors, walls, trash/debris throughout the facility, broken chair and tile, unsecured sharps and chemicals, and visible harborage of pests. This deficient practice has the potential to affect multiple residents throughout the facility. Findings include: Review of multiple complaints reported to the State Agency included allegations that the facility was not clean. During the abbreviated survey conducted on 5/28/24, the following concerns with the facility's environment were identified: At 9:50 AM, the hallway outside room [ROOM NUMBER] and 114 was littered with debris. The chair outside room [ROOM NUMBER] had linens and used gloves stored directly on the floor behind the chair. The flooring throughout hallway near room [ROOM NUMBER]/202 observed with scattered debris. At 9:57 AM, the Anna's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-28 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure a medication cart was locked and secured, resulting in the potential for unauthorized access and diversion of narcotic medications. Findings include: On 5/28/24 at 3:23 PM, a medication cart located on the Oakridge Unit, in front of room [ROOM NUMBER], was observed unlocked and unattended by authorized staff. The medications were accessible in all drawers, including the narcotic storage drawer. Registered Nurse (RN) A returned to the cart on the Oakridge Unit indicating a medication count was being performed with another nurse, away from the assigned medication cart. RN A confirmed the cart was left unlocked, unattended, and medications, including scheduled narcotics were accessible to unauthorized personnel. On 5/28/24 at 3:38 PM, the Director of Nursing (DON) was interviewed and acknowledged medication carts are to be locked and secured by authorized personnel. Review of the facilities policy title; Medication and Treatment Cart Storage dated…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-03-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00142846 Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure professional standards of nursing practice was provided by the nursing staff to administer pain medications as directed by the physician for one (R801) of three residents reviewed for pain. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the facility staff to have failed to administer R801's pain medication as directed by the physician. Review of the medical record revealed R801 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: malignant neoplasm of cervix, abscess of vulva and acute kidney failure. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition and required staff assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of a Physician Team - H&P (history & physical) dated 10/29/23 at 8:08 AM, documented in part . diagnosed with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-03-14 · tag F0773 — pattern
    Provide or obtain laboratory tests/services when ordered and promptly tell the ordering practitioner of the results.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake: MI00142846. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility staff failed to ensure labs were completed as ordered by the medical clinicians for one (R801) of three residents reviewed for a change of condition. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the facility to have failed to assess a change of condition with R801 in a timely manner. Review of the medical record revealed the following: A Complete Blood Count (CBC) report dated 11/1/23, documented a [NAME] Blood Cell (WBC) Count of 12.3, High, (normal range 3.3-10.7). A Physician Team - Progress Note dated 11/6/23 at 1:50 PM, documented in part . WBC 12.3, repeat labs . consider UA (urinalysis) if leukocytosis (elevated WBC) persists . Review of the physician orders revealed multiple orders to repeat the CBC labs on the following dates: 11/5/23, 11/12/23, 11/15/23 & 11/17/23. Review of the medical record revealed no documentation of the CBC to have been repeated as directed by the medical clinician for the above dates. A Stat…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00143149 & MI00142861. Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure supervision for an appointment (appt) was provided for a resident who lacked capacity, one R802 of three residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented concerns of the facility staff to have failed to accompany R802 to their medical appt and once found, R802's head helmet that's worn for medical purposes was found on the floor. Review of the medical record revealed R802 was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses that included: hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction affecting left non-dominant side, functional quadriplegia, gastrostomy, and anoxic brain damage. Review of a Physician Statement of Capacity for Medical Treatment and Decisions documented the resident lacked the capacity to make reasoned medical decisions and provide informed consent for their medical affairs, signed by the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00142846. Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to obtain weights per the facility's policy for one (R801) of one resident reviewed for weight loss. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented a concern of R801 to have had a significant weight loss while inpatient at the facility. Review of the medical record revealed R801 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: malignant neoplasm of cervix, abscess of vulva and acute kidney failure. A Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], documented a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, which indicated intact cognition and required staff assistance for Activities of Daily Living (ADLs). Review of the only documented weight obtained by the facility staff on 10/27/23 at 8:12 PM, documented 143.3 lbs (pounds). Review of the medical record revealed the resident was transferred to the hospital on [DATE] for a change of condition.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-03-14 · tag F0825 — isolated
    Provide or get specialized rehabilitative services as required for a resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake: MI00143213. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to provide therapy services as ordered by the physician for one (R803) of two residents reviewed for rehabilitation services. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented the facility failed to provide appropriate and adequate rehabilitation services. The complaint documented in part . Multiple times (R803) went 3 & 4 day stretches without PT (physical therapy) or OT (occupational therapy). When we brought this up, we were told they were short staffed & another time we were told that a stomach bug had hit their PT staff . Review of the medical record revealed R803 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: acute kidney failure and diastolic congestive heart failure. Review of the documents provided to that facility by the transferring facility noted the resident was transferred for extensive rehabilitation. Review of the physician orders…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00141529. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to assess and treat a resident who expressed pain for one (R804) of two residents reviewed for changes in condition, resulting in unrelieved pain. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed the following allegations: .(R804) discharged from the hospital and was transferred to (facility) around 1:30 PM on 12/7(2023). After being transported to her room, (R804) did not see another staff member until about 9:30 PM, and only after family intervened. (R804) la <sic> in her bed bleeding and in pain. She tried many times to use her call light, however, no staff came to assist her. She eventually called her daughter by phone, who then called the facility directly and also 911 to have (R804) transported back to the hospital . Review of R804's clinical record revealed R804 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and was discharged to the hospital on the same day with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-30 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake Number(s): MI00142295 and MI00142293. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure safe positioning in a wheelchair with access to a call light for one (R801) of two residents reviewed for falls, resulting in a fall from the wheelchair and sustaining a bump to the head. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed the following allegations: .facility staff put the resident in her wheelchair with a pillow on the seat and it was slippery .staff didn't lock the wheelchair and they didn't put the residents call light within reach before leaving the room .the resident used her cellphone to call her daughter and tell her she was falling out of her wheelchair and needed help .staff didn't get to the residents room until after she fell out her wheelchair and onto the floor .the resident hit her head and right shoulder and .blacked out .resident does have a knot on her head where it hit the floor . On 1/29/24 at 3:05 PM, R801 was observed lying on her side in bed. Bed was not in the lowest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-11-15 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00139462 Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure narcotic medications were documented as administered per professional standards for one (R802) of one resident reviewed for professional standards resulting in the inaccurate representation of the amount given and the effectiveness of pain medications. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged in part that R802's record was inaccurate/false. Review of the closed record revealed R802 was admitted into the facility on 8/25/23 with diagnoses that included: fracture of left tibia, fracture of left fibula and multiple fractures of pelvis. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R802 was cognitively intact and required the assistance of staff for activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of R802's pain care plan initiated 8/26/23 revealed an intervention that read, Administer pain medication as ordered. Monitor for effectiveness. Review of R802's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-11-15 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes: MI00140611 and MI00140683. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to timely obtain, acknowledge and ensure a resident's choice for health care decision making prior to petitioning for a third party guardian for one (R807) of one resident reviewed for resident rights, resulting in expressions of extreme frustration, distress, fear of loss of autonomy and the increased potential for further denial of the resident's right for self-determination under a reasonable person concept for a resident who had appointed a family member as their legal representative prior to the deterioration of their health condition. Findings include: Review of a complaint filed to the State Agency read in part, I should file a petition for guardianship of my (age omitted) year old (relationship omitted) (blind with dementia). In Aug. 2023, I called the court and made plans to file the petition. Prior to going to court, I called (facility name omitted). The social worker…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-11-15 · tag F0805 — failed to prepare food in a form residents can eat — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food prepared in a form designed to meet individual needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake MI00139532, MI00139080 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide food in the prescribed texture/consistency for one (R803) of four residents reviewed for therapeutic diets, resulting in the increased potential for episodes of choking and aspiration to occur. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged in part, the facility did not provide the correct diet to R803. On 11/14/23 at 12:28 PM, R803 was observed sitting in a wheelchair eating lunch. The food on the tray appeared to be pureed. R803 was asked if they had difficulty swallowing. R803 said yes. When asked how was the food at the facility, R803 made a noncommittal sound. Review of the clinical record revealed R803 was admitted into the facility on 3/31/20 and readmitted [DATE] with diagnoses that included: dementia, diabetes and macular degeneration. According to the Minimum Data Set assessment dated [DATE], R803 had severely impaired cognition and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain a sanitary kitchen; ensure food items were properly labeled, dated, and stored; monitor and maintain refrigerator and freezer temperature logs; and ensure proper functioning of the dish machine, resulting in the increased potential for cross-contamination and foodborne illness. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. On 6/27/23, during an initial tour of the kitchen with Interim Dietary Manager (Staff 'S') between 8:56 AM - 9:45 AM, the following items were observed: In the dry storage room, there was an opened plastic bag of pecans that were stored on a top shelf. The package was not properly sealed and was open to air, and there was no date of when it had been opened. The temperature log on the outside of the walk-in freezer was documented as last completed on 6/26/23 for evening shift. In the walk-in freezer, the entire left side of the freezer ceiling, wall and storage shelving underneath had thick build-up of ice. Staff 'S' reported…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a homelike dining experience based on the reasonable person standard for one resident (R94) and multiple other residents with cognitive impairments who ate their meals in the Anna's Place dining room. Findings include: On 6/28/23 at approximately 9:33 a.m., An observation of the breakfast meal was made on the Anna's Place dining room in which four residents were observed sitting at the tables eating the breakfast meal. All of the residents were observed to be served their food on cafeteria style meal trays without the plates being taken off and put on the table for consumption. On 6/28/23 at approximately 1:35 p.m., During the lunch meal, facility staff were observed serving the lunch meal to the residents in the Anna's Place dining room. The staff were observed to serve the meal on cafeteria style meal trays and leaving the plates and silverware on them while the residents were served the food. On 6/28/23 at approximately 1:40 p.m., R94 was observed eating their lunch meal off of the cafeteria meal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY R153 A complaint was filed with the SA that alleged R153 was not receiving weekly showers two times per week. A review of R153's clinical record documented the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: cellulitis, gangrene and type II diabetes. A review of the resident's MDS indicated the resident had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS)score of 15/15 (cognitively intact) and required extensive one to two person assist for most ADLs. On 6/28/23 at approximately 10:11 AM, the facility was asked to provide any documentation pertaining to R153's showers during their stay at the facility. The following paper shower documents were provided: 1/24/23: R (refused) 2/1/23: Shower not provided 2/10/23: Shower not provided * There were not further documentation as to resident receiving showers during their stay at the facility from 1/24/23 to discharge on [DATE]. Resident #124 On 6/27/23 at approximately 11:04 a.m., R124 was observed in their room, up in their wheelchair. R124 was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # MI00134296 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure over an extended period that residents with limited mobility were assessed timely for appropriate assistive devices to maintain or improve functional mobility for one (R118) of one Residents reviewed for mobility and assistive devices resulting in the potential for a decline their bed mobility/self-care, dissatisfaction, and frustration with care. Findings include: A record review revealed R118 was a long-term resident of the facility and was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R118's admitting diagnoses included left hemiplegia and hemiparesis, osteoarthritis, congestive heart failure, and had history of heart valve replacement surgery. R118 had a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 15/15, indicative of intact cognition. Based on the most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 5/18/23, R118 needed one-person (staff)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate storage and/or labeling of medications and treatments/biologicals in three of five medication carts and one treatment carts reviewed, resulting in the potential for unauthorized entry, misuse, contamination, and diversion of narcotics and controlled substances. This deficient practice has the potential to affect multiple residents in the facility. Findings include: According to the facility's policy titled, Medication & Treatment Cart Storage dated 5/4/2022: .It is the policy of this facility to ensure all supplies for treatments and medications housed on our premises will be stored in the pharmacy and/or medication rooms according to the manufacturer's recommendations and sufficient to ensure proper sanitation, temperature, light, ventilation, moisture control, segregation, and security .All drugs and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments (i.e., medication carts, cabinets, drawers, refrigerators, medication…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-06-29 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    On 6/29/23 at 8:23 AM, R55's Family Member was interviewed by phone. When asked about concerns at the facility, R55's Family Member explained the meals are frequently served late, as an example, on 6/28/23, lunch was not served until 1:40 PM and dinner will sometime be served at 6:30 PM, an hour after it is supposed to be served .it is ridiculous because the residents are just sitting in the dining room with nothing to do, they just sit there for hours. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure meals were served in a timely manner and per facility scheduled times for residents that resided within the Anna's House (secured unit), resulting in delayed meal service and dissatisfaction with the dining experience. Findings include: According to the documentation of facility scheduled mealtimes, the meals were to be provided for Breakfast from 7:30 AM - 8:30 AM; Lunch from 11:30 AM - 12:30 PM; and Dinner from 4:30 PM - 5:30 PM. On 6/28/23 at 12:15 PM, observations of the facility's lunch meal setup revealed an adequate number of dietary staff,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper infection control practices were followed for one (R148) of three residents reviewed for transmission-based precautions (TBP). Findings include: On 6/27/23 at 10:34 AM, signage was observed on R148's door that indicated they were on Contact Precautions (Contact precautions prevent transmission of infectious agents that are spread by direct or indirect contact with the resident or their environment). The signage also indicated a gown, gloves, and separate and/or sanitized equipment was required when entering that room. At that time, Nurse 'PP' was observed entering R148's room without a gown. R148 was observed passing medication to R148 without gloves. Nurse 'PP' was holding a plastic basket that contained a glucometer and was full of unused lancets. Nurse 'PP' exited R148's room and wiped the outside of the basket that contained the lancets with a sanitizing wipe and placed it into the medication cart immediately without waiting for the sanitizer to dry. When queried about why a gown and gloves…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration was performed according to professional nursing standards of practice for two (R90 and R253) residents. Findings include: On 6/28/23 at 8:24 AM, Nurse 'JJ' was observed passing medications to R90's roommate. After passing medications to R90's roommate, Nurse 'JJ' entered R90's side of the room carrying a cup of medications to administer to R90. At that time, Nurse 'JJ' took R90's vital signs and discovered their heart rate was low. Nurse 'JJ' took the medication cup to the medication cart and removed a tablet from the cup and discarded it and then administered the remaining medication to R90. When queried about when medications should be prepared, Nurse 'JJ' reported medications were prepared at the time of administration. When queried about when vital signs were taken to determine whether a medication with parameters was required or needed to be held, Nurse 'JJ' reported vital signs were taken before preparing the medication. When queried about why Nurse 'JJ' had R90's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI00136649 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident was adequately prepared for discharge home for one (R156) of three sampled residents reviewed for discharge planning from a total of three, Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged R156 was discharged from the facility without their necessary pain medication, insulin and medical equipment. The complainant reported that R156 suffered from a spinal injury that caused severe pain. They further reported that R156 did not receive a shower chair, grab bars and an extended toilet seat prior to their discharge resulting in the resident not being able to take a shower at home. A review of R156's clinical record revealed the resident was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: end stage renal disease, spinal injury. Continued review of R156's record revealed, in part: Discharge Summary & Instructions: .discharge date : [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation has two deficient practices. Deficient practice #1. This citation pertains to Intake #MI00137787 and MI00137804. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure neuro checks were completed following a resident's fall causing injury to the head for one (R162) of seven residents reviewed for falls/accidents. Findings include: A Complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged on 2/23/23 they observed R162 with a bruise on the left side of their head. The Complainant noted that staff did not know what happened, but told them they put R162 back to bed at about 7:00 PM on 2/22/23 and did not provide medical attention. On 2/23/23 the resident was transferred to the hospital and diagnosed with a subdural hematoma and a concussion. A facility policy titled, Neurochecks on those Residents who Hit their Head (10/1/2017) was reviewed and documented, in part: .Policy: Any resident who sustains a fall with head involvement shall have neurochecks times 48 hours .Any resident who…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s MI00136943 and MI00136471. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to perform a wheelchair transport in a safe manner and thoroughly investigate the root cause of an injury; and failed to follow the plan of care for two (R4 and R110) of eight Residents reviewed for accidents hazards, resulting in an injury (bruising, redness, swelling, and pain) to R4's ankle and potential for further falls. Findings include: R4 On 6/27/23 at 10:48 AM, R4 was observed in their bed. An interview was conducted at that time. When queried about their care in the facility, R4 reported they had pain in their leg due to an incident that occurred with the physical therapist the week prior. R4 explained that the therapist had them in a wheelchair and it did not have foot rests. R4 reported the therapist instructed them to place their right foot on top of their left foot and began rolling the wheelchair. R4 explained their right food fell off of their left foot and went…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessment and monitoring of hydration for one (R51) of one resident reviewed for hydration. Findings include: On 6/27/23 at 9:51 AM, R51 was observed lying in bed. An intravenous (IV) catheter was observed in R51's right wrist connected to an IV bag of 0.9% Sodium Chloride Injection USP (United States Pharmacopoeia) hanging on a pole. Review of the clinical record revealed R51 was admitted into the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: kidney disease, dementia and stroke. According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R51 had moderately impaired cognition and required the extensive assistance of staff for activities of daily living (ADL's). Review of R51's nutritional care plan initiated 6/14/23 revealed an intervention that read, Offer food and beverage selections. Review of R51's June 2023 Medication Administration Record (MAR) revealed an order dated 6/26/23 that read, Sodium…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake #MI134568 Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure consistent communication between the hemodialysis center and the facility for one (R152) of three residents reviewed for dialysis. Findings include: A complaint was filed with the State Agency (SA) that alleged R152 had missed dialysis appointments and often left for dialysis without a coat. A review of R152's clinical record revealed R152 was initially admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: CVA (stroke), type II diabetes and end stage renal disease. A review of R152's MDS (minimum data set) noted the resident had a BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) of 12/15 (moderately impaired cognition) and required extensive two-person assistance for transfers and bed mobility. Continued review of R152's clinical record noted, in part, the following: Order (1/19/23): Dialysis Treatment Center (name redacted) .Tues, Thurs, Sat . *It should be noted that on 1/20/23 the Order was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — isolated
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure two (Nurse 'PP' and Nurse Aide 'N') of 11 nursing staff reviewedf had the skills and competencies necessary to care for residents' needs. Findings include: Review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency revealed an allegation that a newly licensed nurse was assigned to a unit with residents who had high acuity medical issues and they did not feel comfortable working on that unit. On 6/23/23 at 4:12 PM, a phone interview was conducted with the complainant who reported they ended up leaving the facility after they were assigned to a high acuity unit that they were not comfortable with as a newly licensed nurse. The complainant explained that the rehabilitation unit had residents who had tracheotomies and were unstable. The complainant reported they received orientation when they started working at the facility, but they were paired with another new nurse for training on the floor who did not know how to do everything. On 6/27/23 at 10:34 AM, Nurse 'PP' was observed entering a resident's room and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-29 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolated
    Provide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00137804. Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a Physician ordered laboratory diagnostic were completed in a timely manner for one resident (R67) of one residents reviewed for laboratory diagnostics. Findings include: On 6/29/23 the medical record for R67 was reviewed and revealed the following: R67 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including Dementia, Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and Severe Protein Calorie Malnutrition. A review of R67's MDS (minimum data set) with an ARD (assessment reference date) of 6/9/23 revealed R67 needed extensive assistance from facility staff with with most of their activities of daily living. R67's BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) was 11 indicating moderately impaired cognition. A Physician progress note dated 6/22/23 revealed the following: following up on pelvic pain Notified by staff that pt (patient) has been complaining of lower pelvic pain and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-06-29 · tag F0847 — isolated
    Inform resident or representatives choice to enter into binding arbitration agreement and right to refuse.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a legally authorized representative signed a binding arbitration agreement (a legal contract that dictates an out-of-court alternate form of dispute resolution) for one resident (R152) of four residents reviewed for binding arbitration agreements. Findings include: On 6/27/23 the medical record for R152 was reviewed and revealed the following: R152 was initially admitted on [DATE] and had diagnoses that included: CVA (stroke), type II diabetes and end stage renal disease. A review of R152's MDS (minimum data set) noted the resident had a BIMS score (brief interview of mental status) of 12/15 (moderately impaired cognition) and required extensive two-person assistance for transfers and bed mobility. An Arbitration Agreement located in the resident's electronic record was reviewed. The Agreement documented, in part, the following: .This voluntary Arbitration Agreement .is entered into by .facility and between R152 and if applicable (no name was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$28,815 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $28,815 — penalty dated 2024-03-14

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 3 of 52.4+0.6 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 51.9+0.1 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 5 of 54.3+0.7 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Greenfield Rehab and Nursing CenterRoyal Oak, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Kent-CrossingGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Bloomfield HillBloomfield Hills, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of WhitehallWhitehall, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of WyomingWyoming, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grand RapidsGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of KingsfordKingsford, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Three RiversThree Rivers, MI 1 of 5Pickaway Manor Care CenterCircleville, OH 1 of 5The Lakeland CenterSouthfield, MI 1 of 5West Park Care Center LLCColumbus, OH 2 of 5Monterey Care CenterGrove City, OH 2 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of MuskegonMuskegon, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation at St. FrancisSaginaw, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of CantonCanton, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn HeigDearborn Heights, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of TroyTroy, MI 2 of 5Woodward Hills Health and Rehabilitation CenterBloomfield Hills, MI 3 of 5Belle Fountain Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterRiverview, MI 3 of 5Canal Winchester Care CenterCanal Winchester, OH 3 of 5Four Seasons Nursing Center of WestlandWestland, MI 3 of 5Grand TheDublin, OH 3 of 5Mill Run Care CenterHilliard, OH 3 of 5New Albany Care CenterColumbus, OH 3 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at LeonardGrand Rapids, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of IoniaIonia, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen ParkAllen Park, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Ann ArborAnn Arbor, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Sterling HeigSterling Heights, MI 3 of 5RiverviewColumbus, OH 3 of 5ShorePointe Nursing CenterSt. Clair Shores, MI 4 of 5Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation CenterLivonia, MI 4 of 5Shelby Health and Rehabilitation CenterShelby Township, MI 5 of 5Abbyshire Place Health And Rehabilitation Center LBidwell, OH 5 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grosse PointeGrosse Pointe Woods, MI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
SNW LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF30%since 09/01/2019
OPTUM MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS. INCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/09/2025
PATEL, RAJANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 09/01/2019
SHARON, ROBERTIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2024
GOUROV, LYUDMILAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 04/07/2023
IMAM, KHALEDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/01/2025
SIKORA, KERIIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 03/31/2025
DUNN, CHARLESIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/08/2025
SHAH, HEMANTIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/02/2025
OPTALIS BUSINESS SOLUTIONS LLCOrganizationTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 04/16/2026
CHARLES FRANKLIN LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
CHARLES WESTLAND LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
HEMANT SHAH 2018 IRREVOCABLE TRUSTOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
OBS OF MI LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/28/2026
OM HOLDCO, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
OPTALIS LP INVESTORS 1, LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
PAAR 108 LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
PINAL R. PATEL 2017 IRREVOCABLE TRUST F/B/O AARNA R. PATELOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
PINAL R. PATEL 2017 IRREVOCABLE TRUST F/B/O ANSH R. PATELOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
PINAL R. PATEL 2020 IRREVOCABLE FAMILY TRUST UAD 10-6-2020OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
RAJAN G PATEL 2020 IRR FAM TR UAD 12-3-2020OrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 09/01/2019
CONNER, MARIANNEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 23 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

15 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$23.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-2.4%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$6.7M
Related-party expense27% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 39%Medicare 18%Other / private 43%

This home reported $6.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 27% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$444per resident / day
operating cost
$13,488per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$433per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235582. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-09-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next