No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

The Lakeland Center

26900 Franklin Road, Southfield, MI 48034 · For profit - Corporation · 91 certified beds · (248) 350-8070 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2026Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation — no harm found (F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$15,926 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2026
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (43) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $15,926 in federal fines (most recent 2024-05-29)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (62%) runs well above the national median (45%)
  • about 19% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 2 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Urgent care / clinic
28411 Northwestern Hwy · (248) 281-0369 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
24680 Swanson Rd · (248) 327-7713 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
27777 Franklin Rd · (248) 262-3450 · Call to confirm hours
Park
23960 Civic Center Dr · (248) 796-4607 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
26555 Franklin Rd · (248) 213-4770

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 4 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating2★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased4.1%10.8%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight3.2%5.4%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%0.8%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%1.5%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms0.8%4.3%6.5%better
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.1%0.1%better
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury0.0%3.0%3.3%check this — see note marked star below the table
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened4.1%12.0%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication10.6%19.4%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine100.0%95.0%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers5.8%5.1%4.7%worse
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control11.5%20.0%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table15.1%14.8%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.2%1.1%1.4%better
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine92.5%79.5%79.4%better
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission28.0%24.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.7%11.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.181.841.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.441.641.80better

* This home reported 0% on a measure where lower is better. That can mean genuinely excellent care — but because the number is self-reported, a zero can also mean the problem was not recorded. Weigh it against the inspection record above.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

59.8% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 56 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

59.8%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
11.6%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
58.1%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.20U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.11hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.07hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.02hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 58.1% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 31 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.20 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 23% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF59.8%CMS range 45.0–73.051.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.6%CMS range 6.9–17.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge58.1%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge67.7%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge64.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified97.8%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting100.0%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened8.9%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization5.9%CMS range 2.6–10.27.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.56
RN hours/ resident / day
1.40
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.73
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.69
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.29
RN hoursweekends
62.4%
Total nursing turnover
72.7%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 91 beds and averages 87.0 residents a day — about 96% occupied, or roughly 4 beds typically open. It runs essentially full — expect a waiting list. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.69 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.56 is at or above the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.73 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.35 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.82 on weekdays — 12% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.67 to 0.29 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 62% is well above the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2026-02-11)
10
at the previous standard inspection (2024-11-19)

Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

43 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 31 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation has two Deficient Practice Statements (DPS). DPS #1 This citation pertains to intakes MI00144702, MI00144797, and MI00144715. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate supervision and implement elopement policies for one (R500) of four residents reviewed for elopement, resulting in a severely cognitively impaired resident being let out of a secured door to the patio by an unknown staff member, unsupervised and was found approximately 36 hours later, about five miles away from the facility. This deficient practice resulted in the likelihood for serious harm, injury, impairment, or death. Findings include: The Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) began on 5/26/24. The Administrator was notified of the IJ on 5/28/24 at 5:18 PM and a removal plan was requested. The State Agency completed onsite verification that the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 5/29/24, however the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and severity of potential for more than minimal harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy due to sustained compliance…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2025-07-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake 1302878. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper positioning to prevent an avoidable fall with injury for one Resident (R703) of one resident reviewed for falls, which resulted in actual harm, with increased pain, emergent care, hospitalization, and fearfulness. Findings include: Review of a complaint intake received on 6/20/25 revealed R703 resided at the nursing facility with a diagnosis of stroke and limited range of motion in their extremities. The complaint showed R703 had a fall at night on 6/19/25 after warning the aide not to turn her, as she felt like there was not enough room on the bed. The aide reportedly proceeded to turn R703, and R703 hit their head on the floor. R703 was reportedly supposed to be a two-person assist at all times. R703 was subsequently taken to the hospital, and had no fractures or brain bleeds but did have increased pain and swelling of their right knee. The complaint stated, “(R703) is in a lot of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-29 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake 3047919. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to protect the residents' rights to be right to be free from physical abuse for three Residents (R902, R903, R904) of four residents reviewed for abuse, which resulted in injuries for R902, R903, and R904. Findings include: R902 and R903: On 6/29/26 at 9:38 a.m., R902 reported during an interview in their room they and R903 had a physical incident between them in April (2026), after R903 backed their wheelchair into them earlier, which had occurred on multiple prior occasions. R902 stated they punched R903 in the head, as this upset them. R902 clarified it upset other residents as well, when R903 was aggressive towards them with their wheelchair. R902 said the facility management told them they had the incident on their video cameras and saw them strike R903. R902 explained they had been told R903 had a prior head injury and never to do this again. R903 said they regretted their action and this would…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has plan of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-05-06 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #'s 2998574, 2991736 and 3001096.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure sufficient staffing to meet resident needs for three residents (R801, R804 and R805) of four residents reviewed for staffing. Findings include:On 5/6/26 multiple concerns that were submitted to the State Agency were reviewed which alleged the facility had insufficient staffing levels. On 5/6/26 a review of the facility resident council minutes for February and March 2026 revealed the following Nursing concerns: February- [Anonymous Resident] sits in her chair to long . March-Long wait time for help . Some days it takes too long to get out of bed. On 5/6/26 at approximately 12:21 p.m., Nurse A was queried regarding the facility staffing levels and they indicated that the facility does not have enough CNA's (Certified Nursing Assistants) Nurse A reported they have had one CNA that worked on Unit one many days of the week when three CNA's should be assigned to work.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0726 — failed to have competent, trained nursing staff — widespread
    Ensure that nurses and nurse aides have the appropriate competencies to care for every resident in a way that maximizes each resident's well being.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intakes 2615522, 2645363, and 2671721. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that nursing staff received the required skills/competencies/performance evaluations for five of five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA Y, Z, AA, BB, and CC) reviewed for education/training. Findings include:On 2/11/26 at 8:06 AM, the facility was requested via email to provide the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) skills competencies for CNAs (Y, Z, AA, BB, and CC).Review of the documentation provided by the facility revealed:CNA 'Y's most recent skills competency evaluation was completed on 7/18/24.CNA 'Z's most recent skills competency evaluation was completed on 8/8/24.CNA 'AA's most recent skills competency evaluation was completed on 1/23/24.CNA 'BB's most recent skills competency evaluation was completed on 11/2/22.CNA 'CC's most recent skills competency evaluation was completed on 6/27/24.On 2/11/26 at 12:45 PM, an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist / Staff Development (Nurse 'C'). They reported they had been in their role…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective Quality Assurance and Process Improvement (QAPI) Program that identified multiple systemic issues that needed improvement and correction. This had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings include:On 2/11/26 at 2:55 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator regarding the facility's QAPI program. Systemic issues identified during the survey were discussed at that time. When queried about whether the facility's environment/housekeeping was identified as an issue through the facility's QAPI program, the Administrator said it was not identified. When queried about whether competency evaluations not being completed for Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs) was identified, the Administrator said it was not identified through QAPI. When queried about whether it was identified that the facility did not have a Compliance and Ethics program that met the regulatory requirements and the facility policy, the Administrator reported it was not identified. When queried…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the required committee members attended the Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) meetings at least quarterly. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. Findings include:A review of a facility policy titled, Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan dated 10/15/18, revealed, the following, .The QA Committee shall be interdisciplinary and shall: .Consist at a minimum of . The director of nursing services .The Medical Director or his/her designee . At least three other members of the facility's staff, at least one of which must be the administrator, or other individual in a leadership role .The infection control and prevention (ICP) officer, or designee .On 2/11/26 at 2:55 PM, an interview was conducted with the Administrator regarding the facility's QAA program. The Administrator reported that the QAA committee met monthly. At that time, a review of QAPI Committee Attendance Sign in Sheets from May 2025 through January 2026 revealed the following:On 5/7/25, the ICP did not attend…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to have an active and ongoing plan for reducing the risk of Legionella and other opportunistic pathogens of premise plumbing (OPPP). This deficient practice has the increased potential to result in waterborne pathogens to exist and spread in the facility's plumbing system and an increased risk of respiratory infection among any or all the residents in the facility.Findings include:On 2/9/26 at 10:20 AM during an interview with Maintenance Director (MD) G he indicated that he started at this facility this past September. When asked to describe the Water Management Program (WMP) he indicated that they were putting it together and when asked who was on the Water Management Team (WMT) that it would be himself and one other maintenance staff person. When asked about any monitoring of the water system, he indicated daily water temperature checks throughout the facility. When asked about any flushing protocols to prevent stagnant water he indicated none. He explained that the hot water tanks are drained and refilled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2026-02-11 · tag F0895 — widespread
    Have a Compliance and Ethics Program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain and implement an effective and operational compliance and ethics program for three (R6, R88, and R3) of three residents reviewed for binding arbitration, resulting in staff signing resident's names on legally bindings documents without their consent. This could potentially affect all residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: A review of a facility policy titled, Compliance and Ethics Program Policy dated 11/1/19, revealed, in part, the following: .As part of the facility's culture of compliance, the facility provides development and distribution of written standards of conduct, polices, procedures and protocols that promote the facility's commitment to compliance with areas of potential fraud and abuse, quality of care issues .The facility has adopted appointment of a Compliance Officer .and a Compliance Committee .charged with the responsibility for developing, operating and monitoring the Compliance & Ethics Program. Each facility's Administrator is designated as the onsite Compliance Liaison .The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2603176, 2610188 and 2671721.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a clean, comfortable, safe, and homelike environment, affecting all residents that reside on the second floor, including R20, R23, R24, R39, R51, R72, R96, and R103 and residents that utilize the shower rooms on all units. Findings include:Review of the complaints reported to the State Agency included multiple concerns regarding the facility's environment, including safety, cleanliness, and lingering odors. On 2/9/26, during a building tour with the Director of Housekeeping & Laundry (Staff 'H') the following observations were made: On 2/9/26 at 10:45 AM, in the Unit 4 first floor shower room observed a vinyl fabric liner attached under the shower bed full of cloudy liquid with odor of urine; HM H tipped the bed over the shower floor drain to drain away the waste liquid through the liner drain hole with attached tubing. The vinyl liner was then observed to be visibly…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2026-02-11 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake # 2610188. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure activity of daily living care (personal hygiene, bathing, nail care) for four residents, (R's 72, 6, 20, and 51) of six residents reviewed for activities of daily living, resulting in poor hygiene, body odor, complaints of not receiving care, and the potential for embarrassment from poor hygiene. Findings include: R72 On 2/10/26 at 10:09 AM, an interview was conducted with R72. R72 verbalized complaints that sometimes there were not enough aides on the unit. When queried why they thought the facility was short staffed they said, It takes a long time to get waited on, and further indicated they missed some of their scheduled bed baths. They said recently they went about a week without receiving a bed bath. On 2/10/26 at 10:12 AM, a review of R72's Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) task for bathing for a 30-day look-back period was conducted and revealed they received a bed bath on 1/21/26 and did…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — pattern
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2615522, 2645363, and 2671721.Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure there was sufficient nursing staff to meet the needs of the residents, resulting in delayed and/or lack of activities of daily living (ADL) care including incontinence care, dressing and showers/baths for residents that reside on the second floor, including R17, 27, 51, 54, 72, 96 and nine residents who wished to remain anonymous that attended the resident council interview. Findings include:Review of complaints reported to the State Agency included multiple concerns from residents, families and staff that the facility was not adequately staffed to meet the residents' needs.According to the facility's documentation of their staffing guidelines within the facility assessment last updated 1/15/26, .The facility's staffing is based on resident population and acuity. The following generally represents the daily staffing at the facility utilizing the number of employees…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 31 citations
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-11 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to Intake #'s 2615522 and 2610188. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent when five errors were made from 25 opportunities for two residents (R#'s 57 and 92) of three residents reviewed during the medication administration task, resulting in a medication error rate of 19%. Findings include: R57On 2/11/26 at 8:30 AM, Nurse 'EE' was observed preparing medications for R57. Among the medications prepared, Nurse EE prepared a magnesium oxide (supplement) 400 mg (milligram) tablet, a folic acid (supplement) 400 mcg (microgram) tablet, and a gabapentin (neuropathy medication) 100 mg capsule. Nurse 'EE' then crushed all the medications including the gabapentin capsule, mixed them with applesauce, entered R57's room and administered them. Upon the completion of the administration, Nurse 'EE' confirmed all medications due at that time were administered to R57. Nurse 'EE' was asked about crushing the gabapentin capsule as opposed to emptying the capsules content and discarding the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0551 — isolated
    Give the resident's representative the ability to exercise the resident's rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure decision making was exercised by residents' court-appointed representatives for three (R3, R6, and R88) of three residents reviewed for arbitration. Findings include:R3 On 2/9/26 at 10:48 AM, R3 was observed lying in bed sleeping. R3 had a tracheostomy (a tube surgically inserted into the windpipe to assist with breathing) and a feeding tube delivering nutrition into a surgically inserted tube into the stomach. When addressed, R3 did not open her eyes. R3 was unable to participate in an interview. A review of R3's clinical record revealed R3 was admitted into the facility on 9/15/25 and most recently readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: epilepsy, respiratory failure, aphasia (difficulty speaking), and dysphagia (difficulty swallowing). A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R3 had severely impaired cognition and was dependent on staff for all activities of daily living. Further review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake #2615522. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote resident self-determination through support of resident choice for two residents (R72 and R96) of two residents reviewed for self-determination and resident choice resulting in frustration, verbalized complaints, and the withholding of occupational therapy rehab services. Findings include:R72 On 2/10/26 at 10:09 AM, R72 was observed in their room. At that time, an interview was conducted regarding an allegation lodged with the State Agency regarding the facility's refusal to apply a seat belt to R72's wheelchair. They explained that when they used to go to their outpatient day program, they were allowed to have a seatbelt in their wheelchair, which gave them a sense of security and safety. They continued to explain that since they stopped attending the outpatient day program (in the summer of 2025) they had been given a different wheelchair and the facility repeatedly refused to equip it with a seatbelt upon their request. They continued to say they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #2671721. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure freedom from neglect for one resident (R96), of four residents reviewed for neglect resulting in R96's frustration and complaints that staff do not tend to their needs/requests when they activate their call light. Findings include: On 2/10/26 at 1:30 PM, a review of facility provided, Concern Form dated 8/4/25 reported from R96 was interviewed and read, Describe concern using factual terms: Resident alleges when call light is pressed staff turn of {sic} call light from desk without completing the task .[NAME] taken regarding concern: Verbal statement from nurse during Admin (Administrator) investigation: Nurse admitted to turning off call light without addressing issues. Staff educated on call light response .Nurse provided one-on-one . On 2/11/26 at 12:15 PM, an interview was conducted with the facility's Administrator regarding R96's concern form. They were asked if they recalled the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-11 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to Intake Numbers: 2671563, 2671721. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to report an injury of unknown origin and an allegation of neglect to the Abuse Coordinator and State Agency, and failed to report resident to resident physical abuse to the State Agency without misleading information that minimized the seriousness of the incident for three (R22, R76, and R96) of five residents reviewed for abuse and neglect. Findings include: R22 and R76 A review of a Facility Reported Incident (FRI) revealed on 11/3/25, the facility reported the following to the State Agency: physical contact made by resident (R22) to resident (R76) .Resident (R22) placed on one-on-one supervision .Investigation initiated . The report did not document the type of physical contact that was made. A review of R76's progress notes revealed a Nursing-Progress Note dated 11/3/25 that documented, Writer called to the unit for an incident involving res (resident) and another resident from…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to thoroughly investigate an allegation of mistreatment for one (R28) of five residents reviewed for abuse/neglect. Findings include:On 2/9/26 at 9:32 AM, R28 was observed in their motorized wheelchair entering their room. When interviewed, R28 said an aide entered their room in May of 2025 and stated they were going to get R28 up. R28 stated they were telling the aide how to properly transfer them and the aide said they were getting R28 up however they (the staff member) wanted to get them up. R28 stated the aide then proceeded to transfer them into the sit to stand machine and left them strapped to the machine hanging while the aide changed the resident's brief while they were in the standing position. R28 explained the position they were left in for that extended period of time have caused them pain they still endure from the incident. R28 stated they had called the police over the incident, however, they were denied the opportunity to file…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intakes 2603176 and 2610478.Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to implement interventions per plan of care following a resident to resident incident (between R51 and R16) for one (R51) of six residents reviewed for accidents. Findings include:Review of a complaint reported to the State Agency on 9/9/25 documented R51 reported an incident from 9/8/25 in which another resident (R16) came into their room with just a brief on and scared her.Review of the clinical record revealed R51 was initially admitted into the facility on 5/19/21, readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: generalized anxiety disorder, major depressive disorder recurrent moderate, adjustment disorder, other osteochondrodysplasia with defects of growth of tubular bones and spine, short stature due to endocrine disorder unspecified, and neuralgia and neuritis.According to the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R51 had intact cognition.Review of the care plans…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intakes 2615522, 2645363, and 2671721. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one of five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA 'AA') whose in-service training files were reviewed, had the required 12 hours of in-service training within the required time period. Findings include:On 2/11/26 at 8:06 AM, the facility was requested via email to provide the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) inservice/education training hours for five CNAs (Y, Z, AA, BB, and CC).Review of the documentation provided by the facility revealed CNA 'AA' only had 7.75 hours of education from 2024.On 2/11/26 at 12:45 PM, an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist / Staff Development (Nurse 'C'). They reported they had been in their role as Staff Development since mid-October (2025). When asked about the facility's process for ensuring annual education in-services were completed, Nurse 'C' reported they did reconcile of the hours and was not sure if the electronic system was glitching or not, but the documentation provided was what they were…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0745 — failed to provide medically-related social services — isolated
    Provide medically-related social services to help each resident achieve the highest possible quality of life.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to adequately assess one (R22) of one resident reviewed for social services to ensure they received appropriate medically related social services. Findings include: A review of R22's clinical record revealed R22 was admitted into the facility on 5/6/22 with diagnoses that included: hemiplegia right dominant side, motor vehicle accident injury, hypothyroidism, aphasia (difficulty speaking), dysphagia (difficulty swallowing), epilepsy, brain injury, depression, and anxiety. A review of a Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE] revealed R22 had severely impaired cognition. A review of R22's annual and quarterly Social Services Assessments revealed the last assessment was completed on 5/6/22. A review of R22's quarterly assessment progress notes revealed the last note was documented in 2023. On 2/11/26 at 9:04 AM, an interview was conducted with the Social Services Director (Social Worker - SW 'B'). When queried about when residents were assessed for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record reviews the facility failed to ensure documentation of the resident/resident representative to have been offered the Influenza vaccine annually (R72) and ensure documentation of education to have been provided to the resident and/or resident representative for the Influenza immunization for two (R's 72 & 23 ) of five residents reviewed for Immunizations. Findings include:R72A review of R72's medical record and immunization profile noted the family to have refused the Influenza vaccine on 10/01/2021. This was the only documentation of the Influenza vaccine on the profile.Further review of the medical record documented the resident as their own responsible party.There was no documentation of the resident/resident representative to have been educated and offered the Influenza vaccine since 2021.R23A review of R23's medical record and immunization profile noted on 12/23/25 the resident refused the Influenza vaccine.Further review of the resident's medical record noted the granddaughter to be the resident's responsible party and power of attorney for care.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2026-02-11 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intakes 2615522, 2645363, and 2671721. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that two of five Certified Nursing Assistants (CNAs 'AA' and 'CC') reviewed for required annual in-service education, had the required 12 hours of in-service training within the required time period which included abuse prevention and dementia care. Findings include:On 2/11/26 at 8:06 AM, the facility was requested via email to provide the CNA (Certified Nursing Assistant) inservice/education training hours for five CNAs (Y, Z, AA, BB, and CC).Review of the documentation provided by the facility revealed:CNA 'AA' last had abuse and dementia care education on 2/20/24.CNA 'CC' had no dementia care education.On 2/11/26 at 12:45 PM, an interview was conducted with the Infection Preventionist / Staff Development (Nurse 'C'). They reported they had been in their role as Staff Development since mid October (2025). When asked about the facility's process for ensuring annual education in-services were completed and included all the required components including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-19 · tag F0919 — failed to provide a working call system — isolated
    Make sure that a working call system is available in each resident's bathroom and bathing area.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to complaint: 2570541. Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident call light system was fully operable and functioning for two of three residents observed. This deficient practice had the ability to affect multiple residents residing in the facility. Findings include: A review of a complaint submitted to the State Agency (SA) documented allegations of the facility's call light system to be broken. On 8/19/25 an onsite investigation into the reported allegation was conducted. On 8/19/25 at approximately 9:55 AM, an observation of R204's call bell function was conducted with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A. LPN A pressed R204's call light several times and the call light indicator outside of the resident's door failed to light up. LPN A confirmed the call bell/light was not working. At approximately 10:00 AM, an observation was made of R205 sitting on the side of their bed. R205 was asked to press their call bell light to see if it was working properly. R205 was observed to have pressed the call bell several…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-07-02 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake MI00153706. Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow a physician order to ensure proper catheter care per standards of practice for one Resident (R702) of one resident reviewed for catheter care. Findings include: Review of a complaint intake received by the State Agency on 6/16/25 revealed R702 had quadriplegia (a form of paralysis affecting all four limbs) and needed a 20 (size diameter) French catheter, the facility ran out of supplies, and R702 was provided an 18 French catheter instead, which was leaking urine. The complaint further alleged R702 was not kept updated when a new catheter was available. On 7/01/25 at 11:33 a.m., Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) “E” was asked about R702’s stay. LPN “E” confirmed an incident occurred in the past month on a Sunday (6/15/25), when R702’s suprapubic catheter (an abdominal urinary catheter to drain urine) became clogged. LPN “E” said the facility did not have a 20 sized French catheter (a type of catheter and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-04-03 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation relates to Intake #MI00151265. Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide adequate staffing to adequately meet the care needs of three Residents (R101, R102, and R105) of five residents reviewed for staffing, with the potential to affect all facility residents. Findings include: Review of a complaint received by the State Agency on 3/17/25 revealed resident-centered concerns related to not enough nursing aides with an increasing census. This reportedly resulted in residents not being gotten out of bed timely, with additional concerns about resident safety and comfort. The complaint described limited management oversight and problem solving given recent management staff turnover. On 4/03/25 at 9:31 a.m., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) B reported they felt there should be two aides on Unit 4, which they described as primarily rehabilitation (skilled) residents when there was higher acuity on their unit, as many residents coming in required full care and full body…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    This citation pertains to intake #MI00147045. Based on observation, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to consistently ensure sufficient nursing staff was provided for residents who resided in the facility, resulting in verbalized complaints of delayed care and services and the likelihood for further delayed care and unmet care needs. This deficient practice had the ability to affect all 66 residents in the facility. Findings include: The survey team entered the facility on Sunday 11/17/24 at 8:30 AM. Rounding was completed on the facility units. Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) A who was assigned to Unit 1 was interviewed. When asked, LPN A said their unit had two nurses and two certified nursing assistants (CNA) assigned to Unit 1. LPN E who was assigned to Unit 2, reported they were the only nurse assigned to Unit two with 2 CNAs. CNA H who was assigned to Unit 3 was interviewed and said the unit was currently assigned with one nurse, two CNAs, and one CNA in orientation. The facility's census was confirmed to be 66 on entrance. On 11/17/24 at 12:29 PM, an interview…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the kitchen was maintained in a sanitary manner and potentially hazardous food items were properly labeled and stored. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents that consume food from the kitchen. Findings include: On 11/17/24 at approximately 8:54 a.m., during the tour of the kitchen the following was observed: The reach in freezer contained packages of unsealed/undated sausage patties with ice crystals accumulated on them, unsealed and undated chicken breasts with ice crystal formation, and unsealed and undated hot dogs with ice crystals. At the time of the observation, Dietary Manager Q was queried regarding the observed meats and said they would have to be thrown away. Continued observation of the kitchen revealed the dry racks for pans had pans stored on them with water puddled inside of the pans. Dietary Manager Q was queried regarding the wet pans and indicated they should be not stacked until they were dry. A review of a facility provided policy titled, Kitchen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure appropriate infection control practices related to transmission based precautions (TBP) for five residents (R#'s 39, 48, 2, 51, and 66 ) of five residents reviewed for transmission based precautions, resulting in the potential for the spread of infection. Findings include: On 11/17/24 at 12:45 PM, a review of rooms marked with signs for enhanced barrier precautions (EBP, a type of transmission based precautions for the use of gown and gloves during high-contact resident care activities for residents at high risk of colonization of multi-drug resistant organisms) was conducted on Unit 3. The following was observed: R39 and R48's rooms had signs that indicated they were on EBP. A review of R39's clinical record revealed an order dated 9/24/24 that indicated they were on EBP related to having an indwelling urinary catheter, however; a progress note dated 11/12/24 revealed R39's catheter had been removed. On 11/18/24 at 8:53 AM, R39 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the comprehensive care plan was revised to reflect non-pharmacological interventions for one resident (R42) of one resident reviewed for psychotropic medications. Findings include: On 11/17/24 the medical record for R42 was reviewed and revealed the following: R42 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had diagnoses including: major depressive disorder-recurrent. A review of R42's Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an assessment reference date of of 6/11/24 revealed R42 needed assistance from facility staff with most activities of daily living. A Psychiatric provider evaluation dated 10/25/24 revealed the following: ASSESSMENT & PLAN Adjustment insomnia .Plan: Continue with trazodone (medication used for off label purpose of sleep) Pt (patient) reports sleep to be stable on his current dose of trazodone Monitor for sleep impairment and document. Counseled patient on sleep hygiene, relaxation therapy, and stimulus-control therapy Mood…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure services met professional standards for two residents (R#'s 13 and 45) of four residents reviewed for professional standards during medication pass. Findings include: On 11/17/24 at 9:38 AM, Nurse 'I' was observed preparing medications for administration to R13. Nurse 'I' prepared multiple medications including Miralax (laxative powder mixed with water). Nurse 'I' proceeded to R13's room to administer the medications. R13 informed Nurse 'I' they did not want the Miralax medication. Nurse 'I' did not administer the medication and disposed of it. On 11/18/24 at 8:49 AM, a reconciliation of medications observed administered to R13 was compared to the medication administration record (MAR). During the reconciliation it was discovered Nurse 'I' signed the Miralax medication off as given, despite R13 having refused the medication. On 11/18/24 at approximately 2:20 PM, an interview was conducted with the Director of Nursing and they said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to consistently follow physician's orders for notification of abnormal blood glucose levels and obtain additional orders for treatment for one resident, (R46) of one resident reviewed for insulin medication, resulting in the potential for adverse outcomes related to elevated blood glucose levels. Findings include: On 11/17/24 at 11:00 AM, R46 was observed in their bed. At that time, an interview was conducted and they said the facility was not giving them enough insulin to keep their blood glucose levels down. They were asked how high their levels had been running and said as high as 400 and 500. It is noted the recommended blood glucose levels for people with diabetes is 80-130 before meals and less than 180 one-to-two hours after meals. On 11/18/24 at 12:11 PM, a review of R46's physician's orders for insulin coverage was reviewed and indicated that if a blood glucose level over 400 was obtained, the nurse was to contact the physician. A review of R46's blood glucose levels were reviewed and revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0711 — isolated
    Ensure the resident's doctor reviews the resident's care, writes, signs and dates progress notes and orders, at each required visit.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's notes were entered into the record at each visit and accurately addressed the resident's total program of care for one resident (R69), of one resident reviewed for physician visits. Findings include: On [DATE] at 11:14 AM, a review of R69's closed clinical record revealed they admitted to the facility on [DATE] and expired in the facility on [DATE]. R69's facility physician, Dr. 'J's progress notes were reviewed and revealed the following: A progress note effective [DATE] entered into the record on [DATE] at 8:20 PM. A progress note effective [DATE] entered into the record on [DATE] at 8:21 PM. A progress note effective [DATE] entered into the record on [DATE] at 8:17 PM. A discharge note effective [DATE] entered into the record on [DATE] at 9:56 PM. Continued review of R69's clinical record revealed a nursing progress note dated [DATE] at 12:05 AM that read, .resident on the floor .Pt (patient) does have a lump on the left neck area…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure individualized/person centered non-pharmacological interventions were in place for the use of psychotropic medications for one resident (R42) of five residents reviewed for unnecessary psychotropic medications. Findings include: On 11/17/24 the medical record for R42 was reviewed and revealed the following: R42 was initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included: major depressive disorder-recurrent. A review of R42's Minimum Data Set assessment with an assessment reference date of 6/11/24 revealed R42 needed assistance from facility staff with most their activities of daily living. A review of R42's Psychotropic medications revealed the following: Start date: 6/6/24 (Wellbutrin)-buPROPion HBr ER Oral Tablet Extended Release 24 Hour (Bupropion Hydrobromide) Give 300 mg by mouth one time a day for ANTIDEPRESSANTS Start date: 6/6/24-TraZODone HCl Tablet 100 MG Give 1 tablet by mouth at bedtime for insomnia A review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-19 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate less than five percent when two medication errors of 26 opportunities for error were observed for two residents (R#'s 13 and 2) of four residents reviewed during the medication administration observation, resulting in a 7.69% medication error rate. Findings include: A review of a facility provided policy titled, Medication Administration issued 8/2023 was conducted and read, POLICY OVERVIEW: To safely and accurately prepare and administer medication according to physician order, professional standards of practice, and resident needs . R13 On 11/17/24 at 9:38 AM, Nurse 'I' was observed preparing medications for administration to R13. Among the medications prepared was Miralax (laxative) granulated powder. Nurse 'I' was observed to use a medication cup for use with liquid medications to measure the powder. An observation of the cup revealed granules measured up to the 15 milliliter line in the cup. At that time, Nurse 'I' was asked how they measured the granule powder and said they…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-19 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolated
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medications were not stored at the bedside for R67, expired medications were disposed, and insulin pens were properly dated of in one of three medication carts reviewed. Findings include: On 11/17/24 at 9:16 AM, R67 was observed lying in bed on their back. A tube of hemorrhoid cream in a clear pharmacy bag was observed on their night stand. At that time, R67 was asked about the cream and said sometimes staff applied it and sometimes they did not. R67 further indicated they were not able to reach their backside to apply the medication. A review of R67's medical record revealed no assessments for self-administration of the cream. Review of a facility policy titled Medication and Treatment Storage dated 8/7/23, documented in part .All medications and biologicals will be stored in locked compartments .treatments will be stored in medication rooms and in treatment carts . On 11/18/24 at 9:02 AM, an observation of the Unit 3 medication cart was completed with Registered Nurse (RN) C. A round loose pill was…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #MI00145151 Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an allegation of abuse was immediately reported to the abuse coordinator and reported to the State Agency for three residents, (R901, R902 and R903) of four residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment. Findings include: On 7/1/24 a concern submitted to the State Agency was reviewed and alleged R902 hit R903. On 7/1/24 at approximately 10:30 a.m., during an observation and conversation with R901, R901 indicated they had had issues with R902 being aggressive and further said they witnessed R902 hit R903 in the dining room. R901 was queried if they informed any of the facility staff of what they witnessed, and said they had. They further said R902 now had someone, always watching them. R903 On 7/1/24 at approximately 10:46 a.m., R903 was observed dressed and up in their wheelchair. R903 was queried if they had any altercations with any other residents and they said R902 had previously…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-01-31 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespread
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Registered Nurse (RN) was on duty for eight consecutive hours a day, seven days a week; resulting in the potential for inadequate coordination of emergency or routine care and unmet care needs that could cause negative outcomes, affecting all residents who resided in the facility. Findings include: On 1/29/24 the facility payroll based journal (PBJ) report was reviewed and revealed no RN hours were recorded for the following dates during quarter four (July 1, 2023-September 30, 2023): 7/2, 7/23, 8/13, 8/20 and 9/10. On 1/30/24 the staffing assignment sheets were reviewed for 7/2/23, 7/23/23, 8/13/23, 8/20/23 and 9/10/23. No RN's were indicated to have worked on the staffing sheets for the reviewed dates. On 1/30/24 Staffing Coordinator D (SC D) was queried regarding the documented lack of RN coverage on the triggered dates on the PBJ report and they reported that they thought they may have been in between RN's at that time and were lacking coverage on the dates in question but would have to check to see if any…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-01-31 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — pattern
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to effectively maintain the physical plant for two residents (R15 and R24) and ensure a safe/homelike environment (rooms 201, 238 and 276), potentially effecting all residents who use the handrails for locomotion assistance. Findings include: On 1/29/24 at approximately 9:30 a.m., R24 was observed in room, laying in bed. R24's floor base plastic molding was observed to be peeling away from the drywall. On 1/29/24 at 9:25 a.m., R15 was observed in their room, laying in their bed. R15 was observed to have the heating register on the ground with the heating elements exposed. On 1/30/24 at approximately 11:23 a.m., R24's room was observed to still have the floor base molding peeling away from the drywall. On 1/30/24 at approximately 11:25 a.m. the handrail across from the shower room (room [ROOM NUMBER]) was observed to be broken and have large jagged hole exposed in the middle of it. On 1/30/24 at approximately 1130 a.m., a blue communications…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-01-31 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure one resident (R8) of one reviewed for medication, was assessed for the safe self-administration of medication and to have medication kept at bedside. Findings include: On 1/29/24 at 10:06 AM, R8 was observed in bed with the television on and sitting upright with latanoprost ophthalmic solution eye drops in the bed beside the resident. R8 was interviewed about their stay at the facility and R8 stated there were no complaints that the facility has been good in handling care for the past few years. R8 was also asked about the eye drops left on the bed and stated that the eye drops were needed and that they had to be administered on time so R8 preferred to do them by their self. A record review revealed that R 8 was re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of essential hypertension, presence if intraocular lens and other malaise and had a Brief interview for Mental status (BIMs) score of 15 (indicating an intact…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY This citation pertains to intake #s MI00138743 and MI00139119. Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure an environment free from physical abuse for one resident (R18) of six residents reviewed for abuse/neglect/mistreatment, when R42 was physically aggressive with R18. Findings include: On 1/29/24 a facility reported incident submitted to the Stage Agency was reviewed which indicated R42 was physically aggressive towards R18 on 6/29/23. Resident #42 On 1/31/24 at approximately 12:52 p.m. R42 was observed in their chair in the dining room, alone at the table. R42 was queried regarding the incident between them and R18 and they reported that they were on the patio playing cards and R18 was talking s* during the game. R42 reported they told R18 to quit talking and they didn't stop so they picked up their can of pop and threw it at them and hit them in the face. On 1/30/24 the medical record for R42 was reviewed and revealed the following: R42 was initially admitted to the facility on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to document as needed (PRN) doses of medication for one resident (R1), of one resident reviewed for PRN medication administration, resulting in feelings of frustration. Findings include: On 1/29/24 at 9:31 AM, R1 was observed in their bed. At that time, they were asked about their stay in the facility and said they had been suffering a sore throat. They further continued to say they asked their physician for chloraseptic sore throat spray a week or so ago, but said they thought the physician forgot to order it because they don't remember receiving any doses of the spray. On 1/29/24 at 12:32 PM, a review R1's physician orders for January 2024 was conducted and revealed chloraseptic throat spray had been ordered for administration three times daily, as needed for ten days. A review of R1's medication administration record for January 2024 was reviewed and did not document any administrations of the medication. On 1/29/24 at 12:45 PM, a review of R1's chloraseptic spray stored in the medication cart revealed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-01-31 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Deficient Practice Statement (DPS) #1 Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to appropriately position a resident (R32) in a specialized wheelchair, of one resident reviewed for positioning, resulting in the potential for aspiration of gastric (stomach) contents, increased intra-cranial (head) pressure/pain, decreased output from the heart, and decreased blood pressure. Findings include: A record review revealed that R32 was a long-term resident of the facility. R32 was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE]. R32 was most recently hospitalized on [DATE]. R32's admitting diagnoses and medical history included quadriplegia (is a form of paralysis that affects all four limbs and the torso/trunk) from brain injury, seizures, GERD (Gastro-Esophageal Reflux Disease), Pneumonia, contractures, and anxiety disorder. Based on the Minimum Data Set (MDS) assessment dated [DATE], R32 had severe cognitive deficits. R32 received their nutrition and hydration via their PEG tube…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$15,926 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $15,926 — penalty dated 2024-05-29

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPTALIS HEALTH & REHABILITATION — 36 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.4-1.4 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 51.9-0.9 vs chain
Staffing 2 of 52.4-0.4 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 35 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.4★, per CMS)
1 of 5Greenfield Rehab and Nursing CenterRoyal Oak, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at Kent-CrossingGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of Bloomfield HillBloomfield Hills, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of WhitehallWhitehall, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of WyomingWyoming, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grand RapidsGrand Rapids, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of KingsfordKingsford, MI 1 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Three RiversThree Rivers, MI 1 of 5Pickaway Manor Care CenterCircleville, OH 1 of 5West Park Care Center LLCColumbus, OH 2 of 5Monterey Care CenterGrove City, OH 2 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of MuskegonMuskegon, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation at St. FrancisSaginaw, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of CantonCanton, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Dearborn HeigDearborn Heights, MI 2 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of TroyTroy, MI 2 of 5Woodward Hills Health and Rehabilitation CenterBloomfield Hills, MI 3 of 5Belle Fountain Nursing & Rehabilitation CenterRiverview, MI 3 of 5Canal Winchester Care CenterCanal Winchester, OH 3 of 5Evergreen Health and Rehabilitation CenterSouthfield, MI 3 of 5Four Seasons Nursing Center of WestlandWestland, MI 3 of 5Grand TheDublin, OH 3 of 5Mill Run Care CenterHilliard, OH 3 of 5New Albany Care CenterColumbus, OH 3 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation at LeonardGrand Rapids, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health & Rehabilitation of IoniaIonia, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Allen ParkAllen Park, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Ann ArborAnn Arbor, MI 3 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Sterling HeigSterling Heights, MI 3 of 5RiverviewColumbus, OH 3 of 5ShorePointe Nursing CenterSt. Clair Shores, MI 4 of 5Fountain Bleu Health and Rehabilitation CenterLivonia, MI 4 of 5Shelby Health and Rehabilitation CenterShelby Township, MI 5 of 5Abbyshire Place Health And Rehabilitation Center LBidwell, OH 5 of 5Optalis Health and Rehabilitation of Grosse PointeGrosse Pointe Woods, MI

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
REH 1 CORPORATIONOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; GENERAL PARTNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 12/23/1987
ENID BARDEN TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF9%since 12/23/1987
POMEROY DELAWARE INVESTMENTS #2, LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF31%since 12/23/1987
PATEL, PINALIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF30%since 07/15/2013
SHAH, NAYANAIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF30%since 07/15/2013
PATEL, RAJANIndividualMANAGING CONTROL - GOVERNING BODY; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/1998
OPTUM MANAGEMENT SOLUTIONS. INCOrganizationOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/1998
COCA SOTO, DORISIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
FERGUSON, DAMITAIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 01/01/2025
PEMBERTON, MISTYIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
SHARON, ROBERTIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2024
DUNN, CHARLESIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/03/2025
SHAH, HEMANTIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/03/2025
CLIFTONLARSONALLEN LLPOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
LAKELAND VENTURES LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/23/1987
LAKELAND VICTORY HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/23/1987
SCHLAUPITZ MADHAVANOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 01/01/2025
CONNER, MARIANNEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 05/13/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 32 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

8 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.9M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-18.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$2.2M
Related-party expense19% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 55%Medicare 6%Other / private 39%

This home reported $2.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 19% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$467per resident / day
operating cost
$14,193per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$394per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MI

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Michigan Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Michigan
$11,254/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$11,969/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,818/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 235589. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-11, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next