No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Maple Grove Wellness & Rehabilitation

560 Corisande Hill Rd, Fenton, MO 63026 · For profit - Corporation · 144 certified beds · (636) 343-2282 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Call the home — (636) 343-2282 Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse-prevention, restraint, or reporting citation — no harm found (F0605) — cited Aug 20251 actual-harm citation CMS recorded as corrected before the inspection ended (past non-compliance)
Insights

The public record raises real questions here. Weigh the concerns below carefully.

In its favor
  • no federal fines or payment denials on record
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0605) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (53) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure rating is low (2/5)
  • nursing-staff turnover (71%) runs well above the national median (45%)

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 2 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 2 of 5

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
714 Gravois Rd · (636) 326-6170 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
197 Gravois Bluffs Plaza Dr · (636) 326-7508 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
45 Gravois Bluffs Plaza Dr · (636) 343-1216 · Call to confirm hours
Park
Riverside Park · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
700 Grace Pkwy

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 2 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 3 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased5.2%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.9%5.3%5.4%worse
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection1.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms46.0%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury4.3%4.1%3.3%worse
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened2.9%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication16.7%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine69.3%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers2.8%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control13.9%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table34.7%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication1.4%2.2%1.4%typical
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine11.4%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission31.9%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit19.1%13.7%12.0%worse
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days3.122.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days2.562.331.80worse

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

9.7%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
47.6%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.24U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.12hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.06hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 47.6% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 21 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 32% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 1% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.7%CMS range 6.3–14.110.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge47.6%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge28.6%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge47.6%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified100.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting75.9%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay1.9%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization7.6%CMS range 3.4–14.07.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.041.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.23
RN hours/ resident / day
0.59
LPN hours/ resident / day
1.79
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.61
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.15
RN hoursweekends
70.7%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 144 beds and averages 83.0 residents a day — about 58% occupied, or roughly 61 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.61 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.23 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.79 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.37 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.71 on weekdays — 13% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.26 to 0.15 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 71% is well above the national median of 45%. 3 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

19
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2025-08-29)
21
at the previous standard inspection (2024-05-07)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

53 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 42 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Actual harm · G2025-06-26 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to prevent a significant medication error for one resident (Resident #1) of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 81. 1. Review of the facility's undated Medication Administration policy showed: - No medication will be used for any resident other than the resident for whom it was prescribed; - Verify the resident identity before administering the medication; - Nursing staff will keep in mind the seven rights of medications when administering medications which include, right medication, right amount, the right resident, the right time, the right route, the right indication, and right outcome; - Additional considerations include the resident has the right to know what the medication does and the right to refuse the medication. The rule of three for the nurse administering the medications will perform three checks, comparing the physician order, pharmacy label, and the Medication Administration Record (MAR). 2. Review of Resident #1's medical record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI - a program to improve the processes for the delivery of health care and quality of life for the residents) program in place with protocols describing how the facility will identify and correct its own quality deficiencies. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 86.Review of the facility's QAPI Program policy, revised 10/24/22, showed:- The purpose is to ensure that all services provided by the facility to resident meet quality standards;- The facility implements and maintains an ongoing, facility-wide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program designed to monitor and evaluate the quality of resident care, pursue methods to improve care quality and resolve identified problems;- The goal is to provide a means to identify and resolve present and potential negative outcomes related to resident care and safety; to reinforce and build upon effective systems of service and positive care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assessment and Assurance/Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAA/QAPI) committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's QAPI Program policy, revised 10/24/22, showed:- The purpose is to ensure that all services provided by the facility to residents meet quality standards;- Goals are: to provide a means to identify and resolve present and potential negative outcomes related to resident care and safety; to reinforce and build upon effective systems of services and positive care measures; to provide a structure and process to correct identified quality deficiencies; to establish and implement plans to correct deficiencies and to monitor the effects of these action plans on resident outcomes; to help departments, consultants, and ancillary services that provide direct or indirect care to residents to communicate effectively,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment. This deficient practice affected one resident (Resident #52) outside the sample and had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 86.Review of the facility's Resident Room and Environment policy, revised August 2020, showed: - The facility provides residents with a safe, clean, comfortable and home-like environment; - Residents will be provided a pleasant environment with person-centered care that emphasizes resident comfort, independence, and personal needs/preferences; - Residents receive care and services safely. Observation on 08/26/25 at 11:48 A.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed two sections of the cove base pulling away from the wall at a seam in an approximately eight-inch section on the left side and an approximately ten-inch section on the right side, exposing the unfinished drywall. Observation on 08/26/25 at 12:17 P.M. showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-08-29 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to assess residents for the risk of entrapment and review possible risks and benefits of bed rails prior to installation or use. The facility also failed to obtain informed consent from the resident and/or the resident's representative for five residents (Resident #1, #2, #10, #72 and #81) out of 18 sampled residents and three residents (Resident #18, 34 and #64) outside the sample. The facility census was 86.Review of the facility's Bed Rail policy, revised June 2020, showed: - Decisions to use or discontinue the use of bed rails will be made in the context of an individual assessment; - The facility will regularly review resident's condition and circumstances to reduce the use of bed rails as restraints while ensuring safety; - The assessment should include an evaluation of alternatives to the use of bed rails attempted and how the alternatives failed to meet resident needs; - If bed rails are used, assess the resident for risk of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0868 — pattern
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to maintain quarterly Quality Assurance & Performance Improvement (QAPI) meetings with the required members. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's Quality Assessment and Assurance (QAA) Committee policy, revised 06/20, showed:- The purpose is to promote the quality of resident care by overseeing, identifying, tracking, addressing, and follow-up on all quality issues;- The QAA Committee consists of the following individuals: Director of Nursing Services; A minimum of one physician; Pharmacist Consultant; Director of Activities; Infection Control Coordinator; Director of Dietetic Services; Director of Medical Records; Director of Rehabilitation Services; and Director of other departments as necessary;- The QAA Committee meets monthly;- The QAA Committee maintains minutes of all meetings that include at least the following information: Date and time of meeting; members present/absent; findings and recommended corrective action; follow up action, as appropriate; time of adjournment; signature of chairperson; and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-08-29 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices to prevent the development and transmission of infection during nephrostomy (a thin flexible tube that lets urine drain from the kidney through an opening in the skin on the back) care for one resident (Resident #12) and failed to perform proper hand hygiene during wound care for one resident (Resident #3) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #34) outside the sample. The facility failed to sanitize glucometers per manufacturer's directions in between each resident for four of four sampled residents (Residents #15, #16, #22, and #33). The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's policy titled,Blood Glucose Monitoring, revised 01/25, showed: - Licensed nurses will perform blood glucose testing as ordered by the physician, following the manufacturer's instructions for the testing device, and facility protocols; - Manufacturer's recommendations will be followed for the use, maintenance and storage of blood glucose testing devices and supplies; - The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0552 — isolated
    Ensure that residents are fully informed and understand their health status, care and treatments.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents with orders for psychotropic medications (medications that alter the brain's chemical makeup to treat mental illnesses) were informed by the physician or other practitioner or professional, of the risks and benefits of proposed care, of treatment and treatment alternatives or options and to choose the alternative or option he or she prefers for two residents (Residents #1 and #11) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #5) outside the sample. The facility census was 86. The facility did not provide a policy regarding psychotropic consents. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - An admission date of 04/08/15; - Diagnoses of schizoaffective disorder (a combination of symptoms of schizophrenia and mood disorder, such as depression or bipolar disorder), major depressive disorder (persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and bipolar disorder…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0605 — failed to not use drugs as a restraint — isolated
    Prevent the use of unnecessary psychotropic medications or use medications that may restrain a resident's ability to function.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to attempt a gradual dose reduction (GDR) for psychotropic medications (medications that affect how the brain works and causes changes in mood, awareness, thoughts, feelings, or behaviors) for three residents (Resident #1, #9, and #11) out of 18 sampled residents and failed to provide an appropriate diagnosis for the use of an antipsychotic (medications used to treat psychosis, a mental health condition characterized by delusions, hallucinations, and disorganized thinking) medication and antidepressant medication for one resident (Resident #1) out of 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's policy Documentation and Communication of Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations, dated 08/20, showed: - The consultant pharmacist works with the facility to establish a system whereby the consultant pharmacist's observations and recommendations regarding residents' medication therapies are communicated to those with authority and/or responsibility to implement the recommendations and are responded to in an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0628 — isolated
    Provide the required documentation or notification related to the resident's needs, appeal rights, or bed-hold policies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to a hospital and to provide written information to the resident and/or the resident's representative of the facility's bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for three residents (Resident #1, #9, and #75) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #94) outside the sample. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's policy, Bed Hold, revised 06/20, showed: - Upon admission, the Facility advises residents or his/her personal representative in writing that the Facility has a bed hold policy and will hold the resident's bed for the state specified period, if the resident is transferred to a general acute care hospital, as long as the resident or their representative notifies the Facility within twenty-four (24) hours of the transfer that they wish to have the Facility hold the resident's bed; - The Facility notifies the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a baseline care plan within 48 hours of admission that included the minimum healthcare information necessary to properly care for the immediate needs of two residents (Resident #94 and #96) outside of the 18 sampled residents. The facility census was 86.The facility policy titled, Care Planning, revised 06/20/20, showed:- To ensure that a comprehensive person-centered Care Plan is developed for each resident based on their individual assessed needs;- The Facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) will develop a Baseline and/or Comprehensive Care Plan for each resident in accordance with OBRA and MDS guidelines;- The Care Plan serves as a course of action where the resident, resident's family and/or guardian or other legally authorized representative, resident's Attending Physician, and IDT work to help the resident move toward resident-specific goals that address the resident's medical, nursing, mental, and psychosocial needs;- A…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 42 citations
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide showers for three residents (Resident #1, #60, and #81) out of 18 sampled residents and two residents (Resident #5 and #34) outside the sample. The facility census was 86. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - An admission date of 04/08/15; - Diagnoses of muscle weakness, need for assistance with personal care, and spastic hemiplegia of left non-dominant side (characterized by stiffness and muscle tightness on one side of the body, affecting motor function, coordination, and balance). Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment to be completed by the facility), dated 07/10/25, showed: - No cognitive impairment; - Impairment on one side for both upper and lower extremities; - Substantial/maximal assistance from staff for upper and lower body dressing; - Substantial/maximal assistance from staff for personal hygiene; - Dependent on staff for showering. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's bilateral nephrostomy tube (a thin flexible tube inserted into both kidneys to drain urine directly into a drainage bag) drainage bags containing urine were lower than kidney level and exposed drainage bags were covered by privacy bags for one resident (Resident #12) out of one sampled resident. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's policy, Catheter, Care Of, revised 06/20, showed:- Purpose: to prevent catheter-associated urinary tract infections while ensuring that residents are not given indwelling catheters unless medically necessary;- A resident, with or without a catheter, receives the appropriate care and services to prevent infections to the extent possible;- Daily catheter care: wash hands, don gloves prior to handling the catheter, drainage system or bag;- Explain the procedure to the resident and provide privacy;- Cleanse the area;- Remove gloves and wash hands;- Position the catheter…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure communication forms that reflected ongoing coordination and collaboration between facility staff and the dialysis staff were sent with two residents (Resident #20 and #48) out of two sampled residents on all dialysis days. The facility census was 86.Review of the facility's Dialysis Care Policy, revised June 2020, showed: - The facility will be responsible for the overall care delivered to the resident, monitoring of the resident prior to and after the completion of each dialysis treatment and providing for all dialysis needs during the time period when dialysis is received; - The facility will maintain a contract with dialysis service provider; - The facility will arrange dialysis care for residents as ordered by the physician; - The facility will arrange transportation to and from dialysis, as well as meals, medication and a method of communication between the dialysis center and facility; - The nursing staff will communicate pertinent…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0730 — isolated
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure four out of the four sampled Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs) received an annual performance review. The facility census was 86.The facility did not provide a policy for CNA annual performance reviews.1. Review of CNA F's personnel file showed:- Hire date of 09/19/24;- No documentation of an annual performance review.2. Review of CNA G's personnel file showed:- Hire date of 07/16/24;- No documentation of an annual performance review.3. Review of CNA N's personnel file showed:- Hire date of 07/01/24;-No documentation of an annual performance review.4. Review of CNA O's personnel file showed:- Hire date of 07/01/24;- No documentation of an annual performance review.During an interview on 08/29/25 at 2:35 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said CNA Performance Reviews are to be done by the DON, but they are probably not being done.During an interview on 08/29/25 at 7:30 P.M., the Administrator and DON said they would expect nurse aides to have a performance review completed every 12 months.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that medication usage was evaluated on an ongoing basis, by not providing documentation of monthly medication regimen reviews by the pharmacy for three residents (Resident #1, #9, and #11) out of 18 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #5) outside the sample. The facility census was 86. Review of the facility's policy titled Documentation and Communication of Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations, dated 08/2020, showed: - The consultant pharmacist works with the facility to establish a system whereby the consultant pharmacist's observations and recommendations regarding residents' medication therapies are communicated to those with authority and/or responsibility to implement the recommendations and are responded to in an appropriate and timely fashion; - A record of the consultant pharmacist's observations and recommendations is made available in an easily retrievable form to nurses, prescribers, and the care planning team. This should include documentation of the date each medication regimen review is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-08-29 · tag F0909 — failed to maintain a comfortable temperature — isolated
    Regularly inspect all bed frames, mattresses, and bed rails (if any) for safety; and all bed rails and mattresses must attach safely to the bed frame.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility staff failed to conduct regular inspections of all bed frames, mattresses and side rails as part of a regular maintenance program for five residents (Residents #1,#2, #10, #72, and #81) out of 18 sampled residents and three residents (Resident #18, #34, and #64) outside the sample. The facility census was 86.Review of the facility's Bed Rail policy, last reviewed June 2020, showed: - Decisions to use or discontinue the use of bed rails will be made in the context of an individual assessment; - The facility will regularly review residents' condition and circumstances to reduce the use of bed rails as restraints while ensuring safety; - The assessment should include an evaluation of alternatives to the use of bed rails attempted and how the alternatives failed to meet resident needs; - If bed rails are used, assess the resident for risk of entrapment and ensure the bed's dimensions are appropriate for the resident's size and weight; - The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for the residents by allowing items to be stored on top of overbed light fixtures in seven resident rooms. Storing items on the overbed light creates a hazard of the items falling on the resident below, and does not utilize the light fixtures as intended. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. The facility census was 86. The facility did not provide a policy regarding storing objects on resident light fixtures. 1. Observation on 08/26/25 of resident rooms showed: - At 12:30 P.M., room [ROOM NUMBER] Bed B with a picture on the overbed light; - At 1:13 P.M., room [ROOM NUMBER] Bed A with two ball caps on the overbed light; - At 1:15 P.M., room [ROOM NUMBER] Bed C with a stuffed fish and an orange blanket folded up on the overbed light; - At 2:05 P.M., room [ROOM NUMBER] Bed B with several hats across the overbed light. 2. Observation on 08/27/2025 of resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-08-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide the required trainings for three of three sampled Certified Nurse Aides (CNAs). This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 86.The facility did not provide a policy regarding the required annual nurse aide training requirements.1. Review of CNA F's in-service record showed:- A hire date of 11/25/24;- No documented hours of in-services from 11/25/24 through 08/15/25;- No documented training on dementia care/management, abuse prevention, neglect, areas of weakness that might need extra training, special needs of residents or training for cognitively impaired residents.2. Review of CNA G's in-service record showed:- A hire date of 07/16/24;- A total of 51 in-services dated from 09/20/24 through 08/15/25;- No documented training on dementia care/management, special needs of residents, or training for cognitively impaired residents.3. Review of CNA N's in-service record showed:- A hire date of 07/01/24;- A total of 46 in-services dated from 09/20/24 from 08/15/25;- No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-26 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — pattern
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for 19 of 43 residents who reside on the 100 hall (Residents #1, #2, #3, #4, #5, #6, #7, #8, #9, #10, #11, #12, #13, #14, #15, #16, #17, #18 and #19). The facility census was 79. The facility did not provide a policy on medication administration. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - admitted on [DATE]; - Diagnosis of Type II Diabetes Mellitus (a chronic condition where the body either doesn't produce enough insulin or can't properly use the insulin it produces, leading to high blood sugar levels) and Hypothyroidism (when your thyroid gland doesn't make and release enough hormone into your bloodstream). Review of the resident's physician's order sheet (POS) dated June 2025 showed: - An order for Humalog (rapid-acting insulin used to manage blood sugar levels in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes) Kwikpen 100 unit injection per sliding scale; - An order for Levothyroxine (used to treat hypthyroidism) 75…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-03-19 · tag F0881 — failed to use antibiotics responsibly — isolated
    Implement a program that monitors antibiotic use.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to ensure proper antibiotic stewardship for one resident (Resident #1) of eight sampled residents when the facility failed to notify the resident's physician for a urinary tract infection (UTI) based on the results of the culture and sensitivity (C&S) (a laboratory test of the urine that shows what antibiotic will treat a specific organism) of the urinalysis (UA). The facility census was 78. 1. Record review of the facility revised policy dated June 2020, showed: - The Infectious Preventionist or other similarly qualified healthcare professionals, will educate nursing staff to obtain and communicate pertinent clinical information to physicians to promote appropriate diagnosis and prescribing antibiotics; 2. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by the facility staff, dated 01/25/2025 showed: - admission to facility on 12/02/2011; - Diagnoses of diabetes, chronic kidney disease Stage 2 (a progressive loss of kidney function,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-07-24 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a minimum of two showers per week for five residents (Residents #1 #2, #4, #5, and #6) out of six sampled residents. This deficient practice could potentially affect all residents. The facility's census was 92. Review of the facility policy titled, Showering a Resident, undated, showed a shower/bath is given to the residents to provide cleanliness, comfort and to prevent body odors. Residents are offered a shower at a minimum of once weekly and given per resident request. Review of the facility policy titled, Bed Baths, undated, showed a bed bath is given to residents to promote cleanliness and comfort and to stimulate circulation. Residents are given bed baths as scheduled. Review of the facility's Resident Council Meeting Minutes, dated, 06/26/24, showed resident complaints of showers were still not getting done twice a week. 1. Review of Resident #1's medical record showed: - Diagnoses of supra ventricular tachycardia (SVT- an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to repair the convection oven, stove top burners, flat top grill, and oven. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility failed to ensure outside food stored in residents' personal refrigerators was stored at least 40 degrees or below, failed to ensure expired foods were thrown away and refrigerators were cleaned regularly. This deficient practice affected three residents (Resident #64, #69, and #444) out of 19 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #43) outside the sample and had the potential to affect all residents with personal refrigerators. The facility census was 92. Review of the facility's policy titled, Foods Brought by Family/Visitors undated, showed food brought by family/visitors that is left with the resident to consume later will be labeled and dated with a use by date and stored in a manner that is clearly distinguishable from facility-prepared food. Perishable foods must be stored in a re-sealable container with a tight-fitting lid in a refrigerator below 40 degrees. Containers will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — widespread
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI - a written plan containing the process that will guide the facility's efforts in assuring care and services are maintained at acceptable levels of performance and continually improved.) The facility census was 92. Review of the facility's policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program, revised February 2020, showed: - The QAPI committee oversees implementation of our QAPI plan, which is the written component describing the specifics of the QAPI program, how the facility will conduct its QAPI functions, and the activities of the QAPI committee; - The QAPI plan describes the process for identifying and correcting quality deficiencies. Key components of this process include tracking and measuring performance, establishing goals and thresholds for performance measurement, identifying and prioritizing quality deficiencies, systematically analyzing underlying causes of systemic quality deficiencies, developing and implementing corrective action or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Quality Assurance Performance Improvement (QAPI) committee developed and implemented an appropriate plan of action to correct identified quality deficiencies. This had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 92. Review of the facility's policy, Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program, revised February 2020, showed: - This facility shall develop, implement, and maintain an ongoing, facility-wide, data-driven QAPI program that is focused on indicators of the outcomes of care and quality of life for our residents; - The administrator is responsible for assuring that this facility's QAPI program complies with federal, state, and local regulatory agency requirements; - The QAPI plan describes the process for identifying and correcting quality deficiencies. Key components of this process include tracking and measuring performance, establishing goals and thresholds for performance measurement, identifying and prioritizing quality deficiencies, systematically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0868 — widespread
    Have the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain quarterly Quality Assurance and Improvement Program (QAPI) committee meetings with the required members. The facility census was 92. Review of the facility's Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program - Governance and Leadership policy, revised March 2020, showed: - The quality assurance and performance improvement program is overseen and implemented by the QAPI committee, which reports its finding, actions, and results to the administrator and governing body; - The administrator, whether a member of the QAPI committee or not, is ultimately responsible for the QAPI program; - The governing body is responsible for ensuring that the QAPI program is implemented and maintained to address identified priorities; is sustained through transitions of leadership and staffing; is based on data, resident and staff input, and other information that measures performance; and focuses on problems and opportunities that reflect processes, functions, and services provided to the residents; - The following individuals…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0623 — pattern
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative in writing of a transfer or discharge to a hospital, including the reasons for transfer, and failed to notify a representative of the Office of the State Long-Term Care Ombudsman for 10 residents (Resident #2, #4, #11, #14 #52, #56, #64, #67, #85, and #444 ) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility's census was 92. Review of the facility's policy, Discharge Summary Form and Transfer to a Hospital with Bed Hold Form Documentation, undated, showed: - Upon obtaining a discharge order to transfer a resident to the hospital, the Transfer to Another Facility form is to be filled out explaining the reason why the resident is being transferred and explaining the bed hold policy; - After explaining to the resident why he/she is being transferred, the bed hold policy is explained and the resident is to sign the document; - If the transfer is a 911 transfer, the guardian/responsible party/next of kin is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-05-07 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day, seven days a week. This deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 92. The facility did not provide a RN coverage policy. Review of the nursing schedules for February 1, 2024 through April 30, 2024, showed: - No RN scheduled for 02/17/24; - No RN scheduled for 03/02/24; 03/03/24; 03/16/24; 03/17/24; 03/30/24; 03/31/24; - No RN scheduled for 04/13/24; 04/14/24; 04/27/24; 04/28/24; - No RN scheduled for 11 days out of 90 days. During an interview on 05/07/24 at 5:16 p.m., the Administrator said she would expect the facility to have RN coverage for at least eight hours a day for seven days a week.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0577 — isolated
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify residents of the availability and location of the most recent survey results in an accessible location to residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and visitors. The facility's census was 92. The facility did not provide a policy. During a resident council meeting on 05/02/24 at 2:58 P.M., Resident #6, #26, #47, #57, #79 and #87 collectively said they were not aware of a binder that had survey results or the placement of it. During an interview on 05/01/24 at 3:30 P.M., the Administrator said they had been unable to find the survey results, among other things, since the administration change. During an interview on 05/07/24 at 5:09 P.M., the Administrator said there had been a new survey binder created and it was placed on the front table.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0578 — failed to honor advance directives / code status — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to request, refuse, and/or discontinue treatment, to participate in or refuse to participate in experimental research, and to formulate an advance directive.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to consistently document a code status for one resident (Resident #56) out of 19 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #6) outside the sample. The facility's census was 92. Review of the facility's Advanced Directives policy, revised [DATE], showed: - Prior to or upon admission of a resident, the social services director (SSD) or designee will inquire about the existence of written advance directive; - The resident or representative will be provided written information concerning the right to refuse or accept medical or surgical treatment and to formulate an advance directive if chosen to do so; - The resident or representative is given the option to accept or decline assistance; - Nursing staff will document, in the medical record, the offer to assist and the resident's decision to accept or decline assistance; - Information about whether or not the resident executed an advance directive will be displayed prominently in the medical record that is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable, and homelike environment. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents in the facility. The facility census was 92. Review of the facility's general cleaning procedure check off list, undated, showed: report all dirty curtains or cubical blinds, burnt out light bulbs, or items that are missing from the room to the housekeeping supervisor so that any maintenance issues can be given to the maintenance director for repairs in the rooms. Observations of room [ROOM NUMBER] showed: - On 04/30/24 at 12:57 P.M., the resident's oxygen concentrator had debris on the filter and on left side of the concentrator. Twenty drywall patches on the walls of the room and on the corner by the closet and by the window that were not painted over; - On 05/03/24 at 2:00 P.M., the resident's oxygen concentrator had debris on the filter and on left side of the concentrator. Twenty dry wall patches on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0622 — isolated
    Not transfer or discharge a resident without an adequate reason; and must provide documentation and convey specific information when a resident is transferred or discharged.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide discharge documentation that included appropriate communicated information to receiving facility such as basis for transfer, specific needs that couldn't be met, facility attempts to meet needs and special instructions or precautions for on-going care, including a copy of the resident's discharge summary, to ensure a safe and effective transition of care for one resident (Resident #92) out of three sampled residents. The facility's census was 92. Review of the facility's policy, Discharge Summary and Plan, revised October 2022, showed: - When a resident's discharge is anticipated, a discharge summary and post-discharge plan is developed to assist the resident with discharge; - The discharge summary includes a recapitulation of the resident's stay at the facility and a final summary of the resident's status at the time of discharge in accordance with established regulations governing release of resident information and as permitted by the resident; - As part of the discharge summary, the nurse reconciles all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to inform the resident and/or legal representative in writing of their bed hold policy at the time of transfer to the hospital for ten residents (Residents #2, #4, #11, #14, #52, #56, #64, #67, #85, and #444) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility's census was 92. Review of the facility's policy, Discharge Summary Form and Transfer to a Hospital with Bed Hold Form Documentation, undated, showed: - Upon obtaining a discharge order to transfer a resident to the hospital, the Transfer to Another Facility form is to be filled out explaining the reason why the resident is being transferred and explaining the bed hold policy; - After explaining to the resident why he/she is being transferred, the bed hold policy is explained and the resident is to sign the document; - If the transfer is a 911 transfer, the guardian/responsible party/next of kin is to be notified and the reason for the transfer and the bed hold policy is explained; - Completing the discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0637 — isolated
    Assess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool completed by the facility) assessment for one resident (Resident #67) out of 19 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #6) outside the sample. The facility's census was 92. Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, revised October 2023, showed timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. Review of the RAI Manual, revised October 2023, showed: - The Assessment Reference Date (ARD) must be within 14 days from one of the following: 1) the effective date of the hospice election revocation (which can be the same or later than the date of the hospice election revocation statement, but not earlier than); 2) the expiration date of the certification of terminal illness; or 3) the date of the physician's or medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document an accurate Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment completed by facility staff) for four residents (Resident #2, #9, #64, and #69) out of 19 sampled residents and one resident (Resident #6) outside the sample. The facility census was 92. Review of the facility's policy titled, MDS Completion and Submission Timeframes, revised October 2023, showed timeframes for completion and submission of assessments is based on the current requirements published in the Resident Assessment Instrument (RAI) Manual. 1. Review of Resident #2's medical record showed: - An admission date of 07/16/15; - Diagnoses of cerebral palsy (a disorder of movement, muscle tone, or posture), schizophrenia (a disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), and diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood); - An order for pioglitazone (a non-insulin diabetes medication), 15 milligrams (mg) daily, dated 08/04/23; - No order for insulin; - A quarterly MDS assessment,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update and revise care plans with specific interventions to meet individual needs for two residents (Resident #67 and #444) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92. Review of the facility's policy, Care Plans, Comprehensive Person-Centered revised March 2022, showed: - The interdisciplinary team (IDT), in conjunction with the resident and his/her family or legal representative, develops and implements a comprehensive, person-centered care plan for each resident; - The comprehensive, person-centered care plan is developed within seven (7) days of the completion of the required MDS assessment (Admission, Annual or Significant Change in Status), and no more than 21 days after admission; - The care plan interventions are derived from a thorough analysis of the information gathered as part of the comprehensive assessment. - The comprehensive, person-centered care plan: includes measurable objectives and timeframes; describes the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for two residents (Resident #11 and #56) out of 19 sampled residents and failed to obtain a treatment order for one resident (Resident #11) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility's census was 92. Review of the facility's Medication and Treatment Order policy, revised July 2016, showed: - Medications and treatments will be consistent with principles of safe and effective order writing; - Did not address following physician orders for medication administration. Review of the website www.drugs.com showed: - Take levothyroxine tablets and capsules on an empty stomach, at least 30 to 60 minutes before breakfast with a full glass of water; - Take the medicine at the same time each day. 1. Review of Resident #11's medical record showed: - An admission date of 06/01/08; - Diagnoses of hypothyroidism (underactive thyroid that produces too few hormones, causing the metabolism to slow down), nutritional anemia (deficiency in vitamins and/or minerals) and shortness of breath; - An order for levothyroxine…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff provided the necessary care and services in accordance with professional standards of practice for two residents (Resident #67 and #444) out of 19 sampled residents. Staff failed to follow policies, procedures, and physician orders regarding peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line care and administration of intravenous (IV) Antibiotics. The facility census was 92. Review of the facility's policy, Peripheral and Midline IV Catheter Flushing and Locking, dated March 2022, showed: - For short and long peripheral venous catheters (PIVCs - a thin, soft tube placed into a peripheral vein for venous access to administer intravenous therapy such as medication and fluids) and midline catheters (a thin, soft tube that is placed into a vein, usually in the arm) used for intermittent infusions, flush the catheter and aspirate for blood return prior to each infusion and at least every 24 hours to assess catheter function. Lock following each use; - Use a syringe barrel size of I0 milliliters (mL) or greater when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolated
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to screen four residents (Resident #4, #11, #69, and #444) out of five sampled residents for Tuberculosis (TB - a communicable disease that affects the lungs characterized by fever, cough and difficulty breathing.) The facility's census was 92. 1. Review of the facility's policy, Screening Residents for Tuberculosis, revised August 2019, showed: - This facility shall screen all residents for tuberculosis infection and disease; - The admitting nurse will screen referrals for admission and readmission for information regarding exposure to or symptoms of TB; - If a potential resident has been exposed to active TB or is at increased risk of TB infection, he or she will be screened for latent tuberculosis infection (LTBI) using tuberculin skin tests (TS) or interferon gamma release assay (IGRA); - Screening of new admissions or readmissions for tuberculosis infection and disease is in compliance with state regulations; - The facility will conduct an annual risk assessment to determine risk of exposure; - Residents…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-05-07 · tag F0920 — isolated
    Provide at least one room set aside to use as a resident dining room and for activities, that is a good size, with good lighting, air flow and furniture.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a dining room large enough to accommodate the residents. This affected one resident (Resident #14) out of 19 sampled residents and three residents (Resident #26, #28, and #84) outside the sample and had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 92. The facility did not provide a dining room policy. 1. Observation on 04/30/24 at 12:29 P.M. of the main dining room showed: - 11 round tables with room for four chairs at each table; - Total of 44 seating places to dine; - One table with five residents. 2. Observation on 05/01/24 at 12:56 P.M. showed an unknown staff member squeezing between tables bumping two residents' chairs while they were eating. 3. Observation of the assisted dining room on 05/02/24 at 12:11 P.M. showed: - 21 seating places for residents and staff to assist with dining in the assisted dining room; - A total of 65 seating places in the two dining rooms. During an interview on 04/30/24 at 12:31 P.M., Resident #14 said he/she gets food and takes it back to his/her room because the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0921 — failed to keep a safe, functional, sanitary building — isolated
    Make sure that the nursing home area is safe, easy to use, clean and comfortable for residents, staff and the public.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a safe and functional environment for the residents by allowing items to be stored on top of overbed light fixtures for residents in three rooms. Storing items on the overbed light creates a hazard of the items falling on the resident below, and does not utilize the light fixtures as intended. The deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents and staff in the facility. The facility census was 92. The facility did not provide a policy for overbed lighting safety. Review of the Receipt of Facility Rules and Regulations, included in the facility's admission packet, showed residents are not allowed to store personal items, including clothing, on the heater/air conditioner unit or the overhead light fixture. This is considered a safety hazard. 1. Observation of room [ROOM NUMBER], bed two, showed: - On 04/30/24 at 3:10 P.M., three stuffed animals on the light over the bed; - On 05/01/24 at 9:40 A.M., three stuffed animals on the light…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-07 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — isolated
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to conduct at least twelve hours of nurse aide in-service education per year. This affected two out of two sampled Certified Nurse Assistants (CNA) D and E. The facility's census was 92. 1. Record review of CNA D's in-service record showed: - A hire date of 04/10/19; - A total of one hour of annual in-service training for April 2023 through April 2024; - Less than twelve hours of in-service education for April 2023 through April 2024. 2. Record review of CNA E's in-service record showed: - A hire date of 03/11/19; - A total of four hours of annual in-service training for April 2023 through April 2024; - Less than twelve hours of in-service education for April 2023 through April 2024. During an interview on 05/07/24 at 5:16 p.m., the Administrator said she would expect CNAs to have at least 12 hours of in-service education per year. The facility did not provide an in-service training policy.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store and distribute food under sanitary conditions, increasing the risk of cross-contamination and food-borne illness. This has the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 92. Record Review of the facility's Cleaning and Sanitizing Procedures policy, dated March 2021, showed: Purpose is to ensure that all staff are aware of the dietary department policy for proper cleaning and sanitizing procedures; In terms of cleaning and sanitizing, staff will implement the steps listed: - Scrape and remove excess soil from utensils; - Turn on automatic water-detergent faucet, fill up sink, and wash utensil clean; - Rinse utensils with clean water in rinse sink; - Sanitize by immersing utensils for 1 minute in solution; - Food Service Director will ensure proper procedures, and will direct random weekly audits to ensure compliance; - Failure to properly follow this procedure will result in disciplinary action. 1. Observations of the dry food storage room on 11/29/22 at 11:08 A.M. showed: - Water heater…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-12-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain infection control practices for three residents (Residents #3, #13, and #87) out of four sampled residents and two residents outside of the sample (Residents #43 and #80) during medication administration when facility staff did not wash or sanitize their hands during medication administration or utilize proper technique during catheter care. Additionally, staff failed to clean the glucometer (a small, portable machine that is used to measure how much glucose - a type of sugar - is in the blood) after use per policy or manufacturer's directions. The facility's census was 92. Record review of the facility's Handwashing policy, undated, showed: - To maintain infection control and prevent the spread of disease; - Handwashing to be done before and after resident care, during resident care when glove changes are made, or at any time hands become soiled. Record review of the facility's Perineal (the area between the anus and the scrotum) Care policy, undated, showed: - The purpose of this policy is to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's dignity with a properly covered urinary catheter bag (a bag for collecting urine from a tube in the bladder) for one resident (Resident #27) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92. 1. Record review of Resident #27's facility admission Face Sheet dated 9/07/22 showed he/she was admitted with the following diagnoses: - Benign prostatic hyperplasia without lower urinary tract symptoms; - Urinary tract infection, site not specified. Observation of Resident #27 showed: -On 11/29/22 at 2:46 P.M., the resident laid in bed with eyes closed while his/her catheter bag laid in the floor beneath his/her bed uncovered with urine in the bag; -On 11/30/22 at 3:29 P.M., the resident laid in bed while his/her catheter bag laid in the floor beneath his/her bed uncovered with urine in the bag; -On 12/01/22 at 11:50 A.M., the resident laid in bed with eyes closed with his/her catheter bag in the floor uncovered with urine in the bag; -On 12/02/22 at 9:16 A.M., the resident took med pass while…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, and comfortable homelike environment. The facility census was 92. Record review of the facility's Resident Council minutes, dated 11/23/22, showed: - Residents want the privacy curtains checked and switched out if they are dirty. rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] would like theirs changed out. Observations on 11/29/22 at 11:20 A.M. and 1:43 P.M., on 11/30/22 at 4:04 P.M., and on 12/2/22 at 1:30 P.M. showed: - A yellow privacy curtain in room [ROOM NUMBER], Bed B had a reddish-brown colored, dried substance on it, approximately 1 inch (in) in diameter; - A yellow privacy curtain in room [ROOM NUMBER], Bed A had a light gray, dirty appearance along the bottom of the curtain. Observations on 11/29/22 at 12:40 P.M. and 1:38 P.M., on 12/1/22 at 10:26 A.M., and on 12/2/22 at 1:25 P.M. showed: - The exterior surface of the window in room [ROOM NUMBER] was partially covered with a large brown, dusty, cobweb-like substance. Observation…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their grievance policy by not making the information on how to file a grievance or complaint visible and/or available to all residents residing in the facility. The facility census was 92. Record review of the facility's Resident Grievance or Complaint Process Policy, dated 5/17/17, showed: - The resident has the right to voice grievances to the facility or other agency or entity that hears grievances and without fear of discrimination or reprisal; - Each resident, upon admission, is given an information document on the Grievance process. The name of the individual to receive the complaint/grievance as well as their phone number is on the document; - The Grievance Officer or Director of Social Services will oversee the initiation and resolution of all grievances; - When a resident, family member or responsible party voices a complaint or grievance verbally or in writing, the staff member receiving the complaint should notify the Grievance Officer and a grievance form is to be filled out; - Written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to implement a care plan with specific interventions to meet individual needs for two residents (Resident #13 and #48) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92. Record review of the facility's Residents Care Plan Updating policy, undated, showed: - To assure that all residents have an accurate and updated plan of care that reflect those individual needs and correlates with the submitted MDS; - Each resident's chart will be reviewed quarterly and/or with a change of condition, by a committee consisting of Care Plan Coordinator, Dietary, Wound Care Nurse, Therapy, Nursing, Activities and Social Services; - Charge nurse to inform MDS (Minimum Data Set - federally mandated process for clinical assessment)/Care Plan Coordinator with any updated or changed assessments on resident. Care plans to be updated as needed to reflect the new plan of care; - Care Plan Coordinator to address any needs or services generated by updating the care plan; - Resident's skin integrity, cognition, behavior, mood,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-12-02 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide consistent resident care for activities of daily living (ADL's) for four residents (Resident #15, #22, #41, and #63) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92. 1. Record review of Resident #15's quarterly Minimum Data Sheet (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument required to be completed by facility staff, dated 10/22/22, showed: - Required physical help in part of bathing with set up assistance. Record review of the facility shower sheets from September 1, 2022 through December 1, 2022 showed the resident received a shower on 9/9/22, (5 days later) on 9/14/22, (7 days later) on 9/21/22, (3 days later) on 9/24/22, (4 days later) on 9/28/22, (29 days later) on 10/27/22, (7 days later) on 11/3/22, (17 days later) on 11/20/22, and (7 days later) on 11/27/22. Record review of the facility's electronic records system showed the activity did not occur for the month of September. It showed a shower occurred on 10/8/22 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate treatment and services to maintain or improve the highest level of function for one resident (Resident #55) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 92. Record review of Resident #55's medical record showed: - An admission date of 6/14/19; - Diagnoses of anoxic brain damage (caused by a complete lack of oxygen to the brain), major depressive disorder (a mental health disorder characterized by persistently depressed mood or loss of interest in activities, causing significant impairment in daily life), and pain. - An order for Occupational Therapy to evaluate and treat one time for wheelchair positioning, dated 9/4/19; - An order for Physical Therapy, Occupational Therapy, and Speech Therapy to evaluate and treat, dated 6/19/19. Record review of a quarterly Interdisciplinary Resident Screening form completed by Physical Therapy, dated 1/8/19, showed: - Moderate assist with bed mobility; - Assist of one for feeding; - Maximum assist with transfers; - Some limits with active or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-12-02 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document accurate immunization status, provide information and education to each resident or the resident's representative of the influenza vaccine (a vaccine used to protect against influenza) and pneumococcal vaccines (a vaccine used to protect against pneumonia bacteria) for two residents (Residents #69 and #81) out of five sampled residents. The facility's census was 92. Record review of the facility's Pneumococcal Immunizations policy, undated, showed: - Resident immunization status will be assessed upon admission/readmission; - Pneumococcal immunization will be provided to the resident and/or responsible party and education will be performed explaining immunization recommendations and possible vaccine side effects or adverse reactions. Documentation of such will be written in the medical record; - The Facility's Immunization Consent Form will be completed and signed by the resident and/or responsible party indicating the desire to receive or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · Ccited before2025-08-29 · tag F0577 — widespread
    Allow residents to easily view the nursing home's survey results and communicate with advocate agencies.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to keep survey results in a readily accessible area where individuals may review without asking. The facility census was 86.Review of the facility's policy, Compliance with Laws and Professional Standards, revised August 2020, showed:- Facility policies and procedures are developed and maintained in accordance with local, state and federal laws and with currently accepted professional standards and principles;- The facility will post in a place readily accessible to residents, family members, and legal representatives, the results of the most recent facility surveys;- Reports related to any surveys, certifications and complaint investigations for the preceding three years and any plan of correction are maintained in a binder, located in the Administrator's office and available for review upon request;- A notice of availability of such reports will be posted in a prominent and accessible area of the facility;- Survey results and plans of correction are incorporated in the Quality Assessments and Assurance audits and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-05-07 · tag F0732 — widespread
    Post nurse staffing information every day.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility staff failed to post the required daily nurse staffing information which included the total number of staff and the actual hours worked by both licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care, in a prominent location readily accessible to residents and visitors. The facility census was 92. Observations from 04/29/24 through 05/03/24 showed the required daily nurse staffing information not found near any of the nurse's stations or the main lobby where it would be easily visible to residents and visitors. During an interview on 05/03/24 at 9:20 A.M., Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) L said the daily nurse staffing information was posted in the nurse's office behind the nurse's station, and that it is not accessible to residents or visitors. During an interview on 05/07/24 at 5:20 P.M., the Administrator said she would expect facility staffing to be posted in a prominent location that is readily accessible to residents and visitors.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

No federal fines in the current CMS record.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 2 of 52.2-0.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 2 of 54.3-2.3 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WILDFLOWER HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/01/2024
BLOOMING WILLOW PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
BROOK PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
DERHOBEN TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 05/01/2024
KNOBEL REALTY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
LINZ TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
PAS B SOL TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
REMBRANDT REALTY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
SESAME REALTY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; TRUSTEE OF THE SNFNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/01/2024
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; CORPORATE OFFICER; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
560 CORISANDE HILLS ROAD MO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 07/01/2024
BELL, JENNIFERIndividualW-2 MANAGING EMPLOYEE; OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 07/01/2024
DAVIDOVICH, NIVIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
KAPLAN, MORDECHAIIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
MINDLE, ADAMIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualTRUSTEE OF THE SNFsince 07/01/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 30 rows in the source record cover these 18 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$6.5M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-14.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$984K
Related-party expense13% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 92%Medicare 5%Other / private 3%

About 92% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $984K paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 13% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$233per resident / day
operating cost
$7,082per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$203per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265395. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-08-29, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next