No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Willowcreek Wellness & Rehabilitation

250 New Florissant Road South, Florissant, MO 63031 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 158 certified beds · (314) 838-2211 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0600) — cited Jun 2025Resident-funds citations (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569)Behavioral-health or dementia-care citation at the harm level (F0740)5 immediate-jeopardy citations$90,333 in federal fines2 Medicare payment denials
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Jun 2025
  • it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604, F0607, F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • it has citations for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565, F0567, F0568, F0569)
  • inspectors cited 5 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (91) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $90,333 in federal fines (most recent 2026-02-05)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • its last standard health inspection was over 2 years ago — the star rating may not reflect current conditions

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 4 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★★ 4/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
751 St Francois St · (314) 838-7000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
345 Dunn Rd · (314) 921-4242 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
750 S New Florissant Rd · (314) 837-3333 · Call to confirm hours
Park
275 S New Florissant Rd · (314) 839-7673 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 4 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 3 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating fell from 2 to 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.3%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight2.7%5.3%5.4%better
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.0%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.0%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms6.6%18.5%6.5%typical
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury1.4%4.1%3.3%better
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened8.3%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication15.6%25.6%18.9%better
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine84.3%90.9%95.3%worse
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers3.4%4.5%4.7%better
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control22.1%17.8%21.2%typical
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table20.1%23.5%17.1%worse
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.1%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine40.0%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission26.2%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit6.1%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days1.162.111.67better
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.492.331.80better

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

11.5%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
0.16U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.04hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.08hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.04hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.16 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 14% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 7% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNFnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF11.5%CMS range 7.1–16.710.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified76.9%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care settingnot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened0.0%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.7%CMS range 3.5–11.67.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs0.971.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.11
RN hours/ resident / day
0.95
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.42
Aide hours/ resident / day
3.48
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.08
RN hoursweekends
54.3%
Total nursing turnover
100.0%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 158 beds and averages 111.7 residents a day — about 71% occupied, or roughly 46 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.478 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.11 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.42 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.87 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.72 on weekdays — 23% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.12 to 0.08 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 54% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

18
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-08-14)
23
at the previous standard inspection (2022-02-02)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

This trend is not current. The most recent of these two inspections was over 2 years ago; the arrow describes what inspectors found then, not what the home is like now.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

91 citations, most serious first. The 17 most serious are shown; the remaining 74 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from neglect when staff failed to provide necessary services to avoid physical harm. On 5/26/25, Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) D provided care to Resident #1, who had limited mobility after a stroke affecting his/her dominant side and an above the knee amputation. The resident had been assessed as needing total dependence on staff for personal hygiene and required substantial/maximal assistance to roll left to right. Resident #1 was left unattended in a raised bed when CNA D walked away to change his/her gloves. The resident fell out of the elevated bed onto the floor and was transported to the emergency room. The resident sustained a fracture to his/her right femur, a contusion to his/her shoulder, and the resident expressed feelings of being scared due to the traumatic event. The sample size was 12. The census was 108. The Administrator was notified on 6/18/25 at 5:05 P.M., of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 5/26/25. The IJ was removed on 6/18/25 as confirmed by surveyor onsite…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-06-20 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy when a resident experienced a change in condition. Resident #1 fell out of an elevated bed onto the floor and was transported to the emergency room on 5/26/25. The resident sustained a fracture to his/her right femur (thighbone), and a contusion to his/her shoulder, The resident was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with discharge instructions identifying symptoms to monitor for that may require the resident to return to the hospital. Facility staff documented a change in condition consistent with the hospital discharge instructions, including vomiting and lethargy, beginning on 5/29/25. On 5/30/25, the resident's oxygen saturation and respiratory rate were low and the physician was notified with orders obtained for oxygen. The facility did not document notifying the physician of the resident's vomiting, lethargy, sweating, increased blood pressure, and elevated blood sugar. The resident continued to decline, eating less,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolated
    Protect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed ensure residents were free from abuse by Resident #3, who yelled, cursed and threatened them. Resident #3 was described as bullying residents and used racial slurs towards his/her roommate. Residents refused to go to activities or eat in the dining room to avoid being around the resident. The census was 120. The Administrator was notified on 3/3/25 at 11:15 A.M., of an immediate jeopardy (IJ) which began on 1/29/25. The IJ was removed on 1/30/25 as confirmed by surveyor on-site verification. Review of the facility Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program policy, revised on 10/24/2022, showed: -Purpose: To ensure the Facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains and Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a behavioral management program for one resident (Resident #3) who frequently yelled, cursed and threatened both residents and staff members. Staff failed to develop and/or implement a care strategy that focused on behavior prevention through on-going Social Service counseling sessions when other options failed. After a behavior occurred, staff failed to closely monitor the resident to ensure the safety of other residents, failed to consistently report behaviors to the physician, and/or psychiatrist/psychiatric Nurse Practitioner (NP) as per policy. The facility failed to ensure Social Services and/or the interdisciplinary team (IDT) consistently followed up on the resident's behaviors in a timely manner. The resident's behaviors triggered one resident's PTSD (post-traumatic stress disorder, a mental health condition that can develop after experiencing or witnessing a traumatic event) and resulted in other residents feeling…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Immediate jeopardy · J2022-02-02 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolated
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, facility staff failed to follow the resident's diet orders for a resident on a puree diet. The resident had an order for a dysphagia puree diet and required supervision with eating. The activity assistant brought a whole donut into the resident's room, left the donut and did not verify the resident's diet order or ensure the resident had supervision while eating. This resulted in a choking incident for this resident (Resident #76). The census was 105. The administrator was notified on 1/27/22 at 3:15 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ), which began on 1/27/22. The IJ was removed on 1/28/22, as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. During an interview on 1/28/22 at 10:32 A.M., the Dietary Manager said food provided by staff outside the dietary department, even if not on the written menu, is considered an alternate menu item. Activity staff provide their own snacks not obtained from the facility kitchen. These are alternates. Residents should always be provided food that is the proper texture and consistency. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received care consistent with professional standards by not obtaining orders for breast radiation therapy (a cancer treatment that uses high energy radiation to kill cancer cells), assessing the resident after his/her daily breast radiation treatments, and assessing the resident's skin condition after breast cancer surgery for one resident (Resident #83). Staff failed to provide follow physician orders and complete wound treatments on one resident (Resident #75) with chronic vascular wounds. Staff failed to routinely turn and reposition one resident dependent on staff for assistance with bed mobility, who was at increased risk of altered skin integrity (Resident #175). In addition, staff failed to ensure one resident receiving continuous oxygen therapy had physician orders for oxygen use and maintenance care (Resident #111). The sample was 24. The census was 120. Review of the facility's Skin Care and Wound Management,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2020-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that one resident (Resident #75) received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice by not investigating a dressing that had been in place for an extended period of time, not conducting routine skin assessments and not pursuing orders for care. The resident developed two additional wounds in three months time. The sample size was 24. The census was 124. Review of Resident #75's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/26/19, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -No cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Dependent on staff for transfers; -Limited assistance required for bed mobility and hygiene; -Diagnoses included kidney disease, deep vein thrombosis (DVT-blood clot in the leg) and lymphadema (a long-term condition where excess fluid collects in tissues causing swelling (edema). The lymphatic system is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-05-27 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff immediately reported an allegation of abuse in accordance with the facility's policy, resulting in a delayed response and investigation, and the facility's failure to report the allegation to the Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS) within the required two-hour timeframe for one resident (Resident #1). The sample was 4. The census was 110.The Administrator was notified on 05/27/26 of the past non-compliance, which occurred on 05/15/26. The facility in-serviced staff regarding Abuse and Neglect reporting protocols and staff demonstrated understanding. The deficiency was corrected on 05/20/26. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition policy, revised 01/26, showed:-Purpose: To ensure the facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains an Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolated
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately document physician ordered treatments on the Treatment Administration Record (TAR) for three residents (Residents #77, #112 and #92). The sample was five. The census was 112.Review of the facility's Documentation - Nursing Policy, dated 6/20, showed:-Purpose: To provide documentation of resident status and care given by nursing staff;-Policy:--Nursing documentation will be concise, clear, accurate and evidence based. Narrative charting, as outlined in specific policies and procedure, will be used for initial treatments or procedure. Documentation for subsequent and/or routine care and procedures may be completed by exception. Checklists, flow charts and other documentation tools will be used as appropriate.--Nursing staff will not falsify or improperly correct nursing documentation.-Procedure:-Alert Charting describes what is going on;--Describe the resident's condition, include what you see, hear, smell, feel, etc. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Deficiency Text Not Available

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy regarding notifying the resident's responsible party when one resident (Resident #81) had a fall and was subsequently sent to the hospital. Staff did not notify the resident's representative until the day after the fall, when the family member, who was listed as an emergency contact, arrived at the resident's room for a visit with the resident and found the room empty. The sample was 15 and the census was 119. Review of the facility's Response to Falls Policy, undated, showed:-Purpose: To ensure the facility responds quickly and appropriately to resident falls in a manner that addresses both the resident's immediate needs and longer-term fall prevention;-Policy:--I. Residents experiencing a fall will be promptly assessed and treated for injuries;--II. The resident's physician and responsible party will be notified;-Procedure: The licensed nurse will notify the responsible party of the fall and any resulting interventions and/or treatments;-Documentation:--II Document notification of the physician and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who is unable to carry out activities of daily living receives the necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene for one resident (Resident #8). The resident called staff to the room and requested to be cleaned of incontinence and was told to wait for the next shift. The sample was 7. The census was 107.Review of the facility's Perineal Care policy, dated 6/2020, showed:-Purpose: To maintain cleanliness of the genital area, to reduce odor, and to prevent infection or skin breakdown;-Perineal care is provided as part of a resident's hygienic program, a minimum of once daily and per resident needs. Review of Resident #8's medical record, showed:-Diagnoses included muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care;-A Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 11/13/25, showed the resident cognitively intact. Dependent on staff for personal hygiene. Frequently incontinent of urine. Always incontinent of bowel;-A care plan,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice when staff failed to change a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter line (PICC, central line placed in the upper arm into a large vein near the heart for long term intravenous (IV) medications) dressing as ordered and ensure the dressing was secured to prevent the risk of infection to the insertion site, for one resident (Resident #10). The sample was 7. The census was 107. Review of Resident #10's medical record, showed:-Diagnoses included osteomyelitis (bone infection) of the vertebra (spine);-An order dated 1/15/26, for central line dressing change every 7 days and as needed for PICC line left upper extremity;-A treatment administration record, dated January 2026, showed the PICC Line dressing change not documented as completed;-A treatment administration record, dated February 2026, showed the PICC line dressing change not documented as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers (injury to the skin as a result of pressure or friction) receives treatments as ordered when staff failed to apply wound care as ordered by the physician for one resident (Resident #8). The sample was 7. The census was 107.Review of the facility's Wound Management policy, dated 6/2020, showed:-Purpose: To provide a system for the treatment and management of residents with wounds, including pressure and non-pressure injury;-Policy: A resident who has a wound will receive necessary treatment and services to promote healing, prevent infection, and prevent new pressure injuries from developing. Review of the resident's medical record, showed:-Diagnoses included muscle weakness and need for assistance with personal care;-An order dated 1/8/26, to cleanse coccyx (tailbone area) with normal saline/Vashe (wound cleanser), pat dry, apply Santyl (wound debridement ointment), apply calcium alginate ag (absorbent dressing) and cover with dry dressing daily and as needed. Review of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident (Resident #55) was free from significant medication errors when he/she did not receive his/her required Biktarvy (an antiviral medication) on a scheduled basis, per the physician's order, to control the resident's human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, a virus attacking the immune system). The sample was 15 and census was 119. Review of the facility's Physician Order Policy, dated 6/2020, showed:-Purpose: This will ensure that all physicians' orders are completed and accurate;-Policy: The Medical Records Department will verify the physicians' orders are complete, accurate and clarified as necessary;-Whenever possible, the licensed nurse: Registered Nurse (RN) or Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) receiving the order will be responsible for documenting and implementing the order;-Medication/treatment orders will be transcribed onto the appropriate resident administration record. Orders pertaining to other health care disciplines will be transcribed onto the appropriate communication system for that…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-07 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolated
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide services based on acceptable standards of practice by not clarifying a physician order for one resident who was not being monitored throughout the day for his/her diabetes (Resident #2) and for failing to complete a follow up accucheck (blood sugar test) per physician order for one resident who had elevated blood sugar (Resident #5). The sample was 5. The census was 104.Review of the facility's Physician Orders Policy, revised dated June 2020, showed:-Purpose: This will ensure that all physician orders are complete and accurate;-Policy: The medical records department will verify that physician orders are complete, accurate and clarified as necessary;--A licensed Nurse will transcribe telephone orders with date, time, and signature of the person receiving the order;-Orders will include a description complete enough to ensure clarity of the physician's plan of care;-Whenever possible, the Licensed Nurse receiving the order will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 74 citations
  • Potential for harm · D2025-11-18 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication was ordered timely and administered as ordered for one resident (Resident #1) who suffered from chronic pain. This caused the resident to experience severe pain and call emergency medical services to transport him/her to the hospital to receive his/her medication. The sample size was nine. The census was 118.Review of the facility's Pain Management policy, revised 6/20, showed:-Purpose: To ensure accurate assessment and management of the resident's pain;-Policy: A licensed nurse will assess residents for pain on admission and routinely as indicated by the resident's health and functional status. Facility staff is responsible for helping the resident attain or maintain their highest level of well-being while working to prevent or manage the resident's pain;-Procedure: --Pain assessment: --A licensed nurse will assess each resident for pain upon admission; --The licensed nurse will develop a care plan for pain management, including non-pharmacological interventions; --Pain management: --The licensed nurse…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Behavior Management and Resident Drug and Alcohol Abuse policies by failing to provide local services and resources for two sampled residents (Resident #1 and Resident #2) who were admitted with a history of substance abuse and continued to use and abuse illegal substances in the community. The residents left the faciity on leave of absences (LOAs), sometimes for days. Resident #1 overdosed several times in the facility with illegal substances. Staff used Narcan several times to revive the resident. Resident #2 overdosed once in the facility and once in the community and was hospitalized twice with a diagnosis of drug overdose and severe intoxication. Both residents were allowed to continue to go out on LOA and return to the facility intoxicated. Additionally, Resident #2 made threats to shoot up the facility and made inappropriate sexual comments and gestures towards female staff. The census was 108. Review of the facility's Behavior…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-06-20 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable standards of practice for infection control for three of three residents observed during wound care. Staff failed to change their gloves or sanitize their hands prior to entering the room, prior to exiting the room, and in-between removing soiled dressings, cleaning the wound, and applying new wound dressings. The staff also failed to use Enhanced Barrier Precautions (EBP, an infection control intervention designed to reduce transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms that employs targeted gown and glove use during high contact resident care activities) as recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and required by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for residents with wounds requiring treatment, for three residents (Residents #5, #8, and #9). The sample size was 12. The census was 108. Review of the facility's Hand Hygiene Policy, revised 6/2020, showed: -Purpose: To ensure all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-13 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their grievance policy to maintain an effective grievance process for residents to voice grievances and promptly resolve them for one resident who voiced a grievance over staff treatment (Resident #1). The facility failed to take immediate action to prevent further potential violations of any resident rights while the grievance was being investigated. The facility failed to provide a summary of the pertinent findings including whether the grievance was confirmed and failed to follow up with the resident to inform him/her of the findings of the investigation and any corrective actions recommended in a timely manner. The facility also failed to ask the resident if he/she was satisfied with the outcome of the results of the investigation. The failures had the potential to affect all residents. The sample size was 4. The facility census was 115. Review of the facility's Grievance/Missing Property policy, revised 8/2020, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that residents, family members, and representatives know about the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-13 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolated
    Respond appropriately to all alleged violations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a thorough investigation of alleged abuse for one resident per facility policy (Resident #1). Review of the facility soft investigation, provided during the onsite investigation, showed no written statement from the resident, actions taken, summary, and/or conclusion of the investigation or findings. The sample size was 4. The census was 115. Review of the Abuse Prevention policy, revised 8/2020, showed: -Investigation: -The facility promptly and thoroughly investigates reports of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect, injuries of an unknown source, or criminal acts; -If the Administrator receives a report of an incident or suspected incident of resident abuse, mistreatment, neglect, injuries of an unknown source or crime, the Administrator or designee, may appoint a member of the facility's management team (the investigator) to investigate the alleged incident; -If the investigation is delegated, the Administrator provides the investigator with any supporting documents related to the alleged…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure concerns voiced during Resident Council meetings were consistently addressed in writing and returned to the Resident Council for review in a prompt and timely manner. Resident #2, the Resident Council President, confirmed the facility did not always respond to the Resident Council's concerns. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided at the facility. The census was 120. Review of the facility's Resident Council policy, revised on 6/2020, showed: -Purpose: To promote the exercise of a resident's right to organize and participate in resident groups at the Facility; -Policy: The facility encourages residents' involvement and input in the operation of the Facility through the Resident Council; -Responsibilities of the Resident Council: -Making recommendations for the improvement of resident services provided by the Facility; -Reviewing reports submitted to the Council and making recommendations and/or taking appropriate action; -Studying problem areas and making recommendations for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2025-03-04 · tag F0865 — failed to run a quality-improvement (QAPI) program — pattern
    Have a plan that describes the process for conducting QAPI and QAA activities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Quality Assessment & Assurance (QAA) Program policy by failing to provide ongoing monitoring and evaluation of one resident (Resident #3) with frequent disruptive verbal behaviors that affected both staff and residents. The facility provided their last four (September, October, November and December 2024) Quality Assessment and Assurance Committee's meeting minutes. Although the resident's behaviors were ongoing during those four months, the facility was only able to provide documented evidence the resident's behaviors had been addressed for two of those four months, September and December 2024. The census was 120. Review of the facility Quality Assessment & Assurance Program policy, revised on 6/2020, showed: -Purpose: To ensure that all services provided by the facility to residents meet the level of quality as required; -Policy: This facility implements and maintains an ongoing, Facility-wide Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement Program (QAPI) designed to monitor and evaluate the quality of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program policy by failing to promptly and thoroughly investigate one resident's allegation of abuse. Resident #15 alleged an unknown female employee with braids threatened to have his/her brothers come to the facility and whip the resident. The sample size was 16. The census was 120. Review of the facility Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program policy, revised on 10/24/2022, showed: -Purpose: To ensure the Facility establishes, operationalizes, and maintains and Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program designed to screen and train employees, protect residents, and to ensure a standardized methodology for the prevention, identification, investigation, and reporting of abuse, neglect, mistreatment, misappropriation of property, and crime in accordance with federal and state requirements; -Policy: Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of property. The facility has zero-tolerance for abuse, neglect,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolated
    Timely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their Abuse Prevention and Prohibition policy, by failing to notify the State Survey Agency within two hours after one resident (Resident #15) alleged to the Administrator, Assistant Director of Nursing (ADON) N and the Social Service Director (SSD) on Thursday 2/27/25, that an unknown female employee with braids said she was going to have her brothers come up to the facility and whip the resident's ass. The sample size was 16. The census was 120. Review of the facility's Reporting Abuse policy, undated, showed: -Abuse means the willful infliction of injury, unreasonable confinement, intimidation, or punishment with resulting physical harm, pain, or mental anguish. Abuse also includes the deprivation by an individual, including a caretaker, of goods or services that are necessary to attain or maintain physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -Goods and services that are necessary to avoid physical harm or mental suffering include but are not limited to: The provision of medical care for physical and mental…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor one resident's (Resident #3) weight weekly as recommended by the Registered Dietitian on 9/26/24 for four weeks and failed to monitor and reassess the resident when he/she had a low blood pressure two days in a row and the blood pressure medicine was held. The nurse failed to notify the physician of holding the medication related to hypotension the first day (Resident #3). The sample was 7. The census was 107. Review of the facility's Change of Condition Notification policy, last revised 6/2020, showed: -Purpose: To ensure residents, family, legal representative, and physicians are informed of change in the resident's condition in a timely manner. -Policy: Definition: An acute change of condition (ACOC) is a sudden, clinically important deviation from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional domains. -Members of the Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) are expected to report and document signs and symptoms that might represent an ACOC. -The Facility will promptly inform the resident, consult…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-22 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain weekly weights as ordered by the Registered Dietician (RD) and failed to communicate with the RD that the weights were not obtained for three out of three residents sampled for weight loss (Residents #3, #4 and #5). The sample was 7. The census was 107. Review of the facility's Nutrition Hydration Management policy, revised 06/2020, included: -Purpose: To ensure that each resident maintains acceptable parameters of nutritional status, such as body weight and protein levels, unless the resident's clinical condition demonstrates that this is not possible based on the resident's comprehensive assessment. To ensure that a resident receives a therapeutic diet when there is a nutritional problem; -The concept of nutrition management is an interdisciplinary process. The key components of this system are: -Identifying new instances of unplanned weight loss or gain; and -Ongoing assessment, monitoring, and evaluation of the effectiveness of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the deficiency cited at F684 under Event ID H40G12. This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples see the examples at 8/14/24. Based on observation, interview and record review, staff failed to ensure acceptable infection control practices during dressing change, did not administer the correct wound care orders (Resident #86), and failed to intervene when the resident had a pillowcase with a rubber band around his/her leg, due to excessive drainage from a wound. The facility also failed to ensure a resident with known bilateral foot and hand wounds received wound care supplies. The resident was noted to use personal protective equipment (PPE) including gowns, gloves, and foot booties (Resident #99) to conduct self wound care. The sample was 26. The sample was 111. Review of the change of condition policy, revised 6/2020, showed: -Purpose: to ensure residents, family, legal representative and physician are informed of change in the resident's condition in a timely manner; -Policy: -Definition: an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-03 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY See the deficiency F808 cited at Event ID H40G12. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided therapeutic diets as prescribed by the attending physician and/or according to their care plan, for two of two residents with an order for large portions (Residents #99 and #67). In addition, the facility failed to serve the correct portion size for two of two meals. This had the potential to affect all residents. The sample was 26. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Nutritional Assessment, revised December 2020, showed: -Policy: The Dietitian will complete a nutritional assessment initiated by the Nutrition Services Manager upon admission for residents. Nutritional assessments will also be completed upon readmission, annually, and upon change of condition by the Facility's Registered Dietitian; -The Nutrition Services Manager will initiate a Nutritional Screen upon admission utilizing information from the medical record, including: -Diagnosis; -Diet…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2024-08-14 · tag F0568 — widespread
    Properly hold, secure, and manage each resident's personal money which is deposited with the nursing home.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain documentation of a system that assures complete accounting of resident personal funds, and the facility failed to ensure access to resident personal funds was transferred to the facility's new management company upon a change in ownership. This deficient practice affected all 61 residents whose funds were handled by the facility. The census was 120. During an interview on 8/12/24 at 7:15 A.M., the Business Office Manager (BOM) said she reconciles funds in the resident trust account monthly. She does not have records of her monthly reconciliations for the past 12 months due to a recent change in the facility's ownership. The facility changed ownership on 7/30/24 and now the facility no longer has access to the electronic accounting system used to manage funds. The previous ownership has not been responding or cooperating with the new ownership to get this resolved. The facility no longer has access to the resident trust account where resident personal funds are held. She cannot review or access the resident trust…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — widespread
    Safeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication administration and assessments, including skin assessments, Braden assessments (pressure ulcer risk assessment), Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS, aides in the early detection of tardive dyskinesia (involuntary movements)), bed safety assessments, smoking assessments, elopement assessments, and fall risk assessments were documented and maintained for 11 residents (#175, #115, #76, #1, #83, #75, #40, #107, #36, #67 and #58). The sample was 24. The census was 120. Review of the facility's clinical documentation standards policy, undated, showed: -Policy: it is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. Safety is a primary concern for our residents, staff, and visitors. Maintaining the integrity, quality, and safety of medical records can help to provide an effective communication between practitioners that may serve to enhance resident outcomes. This facility uses both electronic medical…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain a homelike environment for residents at the facility, including walls in resident common areas, food and debris left in resident rooms, resident room doors not closing to the hallway, and resident hall bathrooms not kept clean and orderly. The sample was 24. The census was 120. 1. Review of Resident #85's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated instrument completed by facility staff), dated 5/10/24, showed: -Cognitively intact; -History of burn wound to the upper and lower back. Observation on 8/8/24 at 11:28 A.M. and on 8/12/24 at 11:37 A.M., , showed the resident's room with an approximate 4 inch wide by 9 inch long strip of the drywall behind the bed damaged with drywall debris on the floor. The resident's bathroom showed a large amount of clear liquid draining from the bottom of the toilet bowl near the floor flange and into the adjoining shower stall. The resident said these issues have been present for months.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — pattern
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record, the facility failed to ensure staff followed the facility's policies regarding tube feeding, and failed to ensure residents received tube feeding in accordance with physician orders to support adequate nutritional intake. The facility identified nine residents receiving tube feedings, five of which were sampled and problems were found with four (Residents #175, #65, #38 and #107). The sample was 24. The census was 120. Review of the facility's Enteral General Nutritional (tube feeding) policy, undated, showed: -The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for the use of enteral feeding and hydration for residents unable to tolerate oral meals and those who have a stable (not new) enteral tube in place. Enteral feedings are provided by bolus (single/specified dose given all at once) or continuous delivery; -A physician/provider order is required to include type of feeding and its caloric value, volume, rate, duration, and mechanism of administration i.e., pump or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-08-14 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents receiving dialysis (the clinical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney) had physician orders for dialysis and/or documented assessments and monitoring related to dialysis, and ongoing documented communication with the dialysis center. The facility identified seven residents as receiving dialysis, of which four were sampled and problems were identified with all four (Residents #111, #46, #50 and #26). The sample was 24. The census was 120. Review of the facility's Hemodialysis Care and Monitoring policy, undated, showed: -General Vascular Access Device (VAD, device that allows repeated and long-term access to the blood stream) Care and Precautions: --Monitor for infection; --Thrill: Normal sensation felt at site of anastomosis (connection between two passageways) for grafts (access made using a piece of soft tube to join an artery and vein) and fistulas (access made by joining an artery); --Bruit:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0700 — pattern
    Try different approaches before using a bed rail. If a bed rail is needed, the facility must (1) assess a resident for safety risk; (2) review these risks and benefits with the resident/representative; (3) get informed consent; and (4) Correctly install and maintain the bed rail.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were assessed for the use of side rails, failed to obtain consents for use of side rails, failed to obtain therapy/nursing assessments and/or failed to obtain a physician's order for the use of side rails (Residents #76, #175, #25, #11, #38, and #116). The facility identified 25 residents with side rails in use, and did not include Residents #76, #175, #25, #38 and #116 on the list. The sample was 24. The census was 120. Review of the facility's safe use of bed rails policy, undated, showed: - Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the safety, psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. The corporation prohibits the use of bed rails as a restraint. The facility will assess the residents' cognition and therapeutic need of the bed rail to assist the resident in reaching their highest potential of independence. A physician order is required to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-08-14 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — pattern
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to offer and provide snacks at bedtime. The sample was 24. The census was 120. During a group interview on 8/12/24 at 10:36 A.M., four residents, who the facility identified as alert and oriented, were in attendance. The residents said the facility used to offer snacks at night, after dinner, and the snacks were kept at the nurse's station. The facility stopped serving snacks in the evening about two to three weeks ago. Observation on 8/12/24 at 6:00 A.M., showed no snacks at the nurse's station on the Serenity hall. Observation on 8/12/24 at 6:17 A.M., showed no snacks at the nurse's station on the Harmony hall. Observation on 8/13/24 at 7:08 A.M., showed no snacks at the nurse's station on the Harmony hall. During an interview, Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) E said there were no snacks kept at the nurse's station or in the medication room by the nurse's station. Snacks are provided during day shift. Observation on 8/14/24 at 6:33 A.M., showed no snacks at the nurse's station on the Serenity hall. During an interview on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing practice when the facility's staff left medication in one resident's room who did not have a physician order for self-administration or medications to be left at the bedside (Resident #46). The sample was 24. The census was 120. Review of the facility's Medication Administration policy, undated, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical, and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. Safety of residents, visitors and employees is a top priority of care; -Procedure: Never leave medications unattended. Review of the facility's Self-Administration of Medication policy, undated, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that safeguards the resident's right for self-administration of their own medication that supports resident dignity and self-determination; -Procedure: Determine if the resident desires to self-administer their own medication; A resident may not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure Activities of Daily Living (ADL) care needs were met for residents #107, #38, and #88. The sample was 24. The census was 120. Review of the facility's routine resident care policy, undated, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to promote resident centered care by attending to the total medical, nursing, physical, emotional, mental, social, and spiritual needs and honor resident lifestyle preferences while in the care of this facility; -Procedure: Routine care by a nursing assistant includes but is not limited to the following: Assisting or provides for personal care, bathing, dressing, eating and hydration, and toileting. 1. Review of Resident #107's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/16/24 showed the following: -Diagnoses included gastrostomy (feeding tube), muscle weakness, and morbid obesity; -Severe cognitive impairment. Review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident with a pressure wound (skin or soft tissue injury that develops with prolonged periods of pressure over specific areas of the body) received necessary treatments and services to promote healing (Resident #75). The sample size was 24. The census was 120. Review of the facility's Skin Care and Wound Management, undated, showed: -Policy: -The facility staff strives to prevent resident skin impairment and to promote the healing of existing wounds; -Skin care and wound management program includes, but is not limited to: -Analysis of facility pressure ulcer data for quality improvement opportunities; -Application of treatment protocols based on clinical best practice standards for promoting wound healing; -Daily monitoring of existing wounds; -Identification of residents at risk for development of pressure ulcers; -Implementation of prevention strategies to decrease the potential for developing pressure ulcers. Treatment: -Select and complete the appropriate form, pressure ulcer documentation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident with limited mobility received appropriate services, equipment and assistance to maintain mobility (Resident #40). The sample was 24. The census was 120. Review of the facility's Routine Resident Care policy, undated, showed: -Definition: Routine resident care: care that is not necessarily medically or clinical based but necessary for quality of life promoting dignity and independence, as appropriate; -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to promote resident centered care by attending to the total medical, nursing, physical, emotional, mental, social and spiritual needs and honor resident lifestyle preferences while in the care of this facility; -Procedure: Licensed staff will include the following services based upon their scope of practice, but not limited to: -Provide a nursing assessment, nursing diagnosis, care planning, implementation and evaluation; -Provide access to resident care policies for any staff providing care; -Delegate care to the appropriate staff is a safe ant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the facility policy for total mechanical lift and ensure two staff were present during a Hoyer (equipment used to lift non-weight bearing persons) lift, as staff obtained the resident's weight (Resident #509). The sample was 26. The census was 111. Review of the total mechanical lift policy, revised 6/2020, showed: -Purpose: a mechanical lift is used appropriately to facilitate transfers of residents; -Policy: -Nursing staff will be trained to use the mechanical lift; -The resident will have a physician's order for the use of a mechanical lift; -At least two people are present while the resident is being transferred with the mechanical lift. Review of Resident #509's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 8/17/24, showed: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Functional limitation impairments: to one upper extremity and both lower extremities; -Total staff dependence for: hygiene, toileting, transfers and eating; -Diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0691 — failed to provide colostomy / ostomy care — isolated
    Provide appropriate colostomy, urostomy, or ileostomy care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly ensure physician orders for care of a colostomy (a surgical opening in the stomach to facilitate waste drainage from the colon) were maintained and completed as ordered. The sample was 24. The census was 120. Review of Resident #18's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally-mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 5/26/24 ,showed: -Basic Interview for Mental Status (BIMS, an assessment tool used to identify a resident's cognitive status) score not completed; -Diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), cardiac arrythmia (an abnormal heart rate and rhythm), colostomy status, history of cerebral infarction (stroke), and quadriplegia (loss of motor function in the upper and lower limbs). Review of the resident's current care plan, showed: -A focus of alteration in bowel elimination related to colostomy status as a result of chronic cystitis (chronic inflammation and pain in the large intestine and colon) with a goal for the resident to continue bowel movements…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's dietary orders were updated and accurate for one of two residents sampled with a gastrostomy tube (g-tube, a tube inserted through the belly that brings nutrition directly to the stomach). The facility failed to ensure the resident, with a history of dysphagia (difficulty swallowing) had updated and accurate physician's orders for mechanical soft diet and thickened liquids (Resident #107). The sample size was 26. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Therapeutic Diets policy, revised December 2020, showed: -Policy: Therapeutic diets are diets that deviate from the regular diet and require a physician order. Per the physician order, therapeutic diets are planned, prepared and served in consultation with the Dietitian. The attending physician may delegate to a registered or licensed dietitian the task of prescribing a resident's diet, including a therapeutic diet, to the extent allowed by state law; -Therapeutic diets will not be given without a physician order; -The nursing staff is…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-14 · tag F0808 — failed to follow doctor-ordered diets — isolated
    Ensure therapeutic diets are prescribed by the attending physician and may be delegated to a registered or licensed dietitian, to the extent allowed by State law.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided therapeutic diets as prescribed by the attending physician and/or according to their care plan, for two of two residents with an order for large portions (Residents #99 and #67). In addition, the facility failed to serve the correct portion size for two of two meals. This had the potential to affect all residents. The sample was 26. The census was 111. Review of the facility's Nutritional Assessment, revised December 2020, showed: -Policy: The Dietitian will complete a nutritional assessment initiated by the Nutrition Services Manager upon admission for residents. Nutritional assessments will also be completed upon readmission, annually, and upon change of condition by the Facility's Registered Dietitian; -The Nutrition Services Manager will initiate a Nutritional Screen upon admission utilizing information from the medical record, including: -Diagnosis; -Diet order; -Nutritional supplement; -Ability to…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-08-14 · tag F0810 — isolated
    Provide special eating equipment and utensils for residents who need them and appropriate assistance.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate assistive devices to residents who needed them to assist the residents in eating independently (Residents #25 and #110). The sample was 24. The census was 120. 1. Review of Resident #25's medical record, showed diagnoses included Parkinson's disease (brain disorder causing unintended or uncontrolled movements) with dyskinesia (uncontrolled, involuntary muscle movements), abnormal posture, muscle weakness and other lack of coordination. Review of the resident's electronic Physician Order Sheet (ePOS), showed: -An order, revised 1/15/24, for divided plate for meals; -An order, dated 2/27/24, for built-up utensils for meals. Review of the resident's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 6/30/24, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Setup or clean-up assistance required for eating. Review of the resident's care plan, in use at the time of survey, showed:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2022-02-02 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to serve food under sanitary conditions by not using utensils during food service, failing to wash hands before applying and removing gloves, label and date stored food, and ensuring dishes were completely air-dried prior to use. This had the potential to affect all residents who consumed food from the facility kitchen. The census was 105. Review of the facility policy, culinary professionals training, undated, showed: -LABELING & DATING: Labeling and dating our products is a vital step to our operation and cannot be wavered on for even one item. This helps us to stay compliant with Federal Regulations as well as ensures our products are fresh and rotated properly. In this training we are going to discuss what items need to have labels and dates and how long various items are good for; - EVERY FOOD ITEM THAT COMES INTO OUR DEPARTMENT MUST HAVE A PROPER LABEL AND DATE. IF THERE ARE ITEMS STORED IN OUR PANTRIES THEY ALSO NEED A LABEL AND A DATE. WITH OUT A PROPER LABEL AND DATING SYSTEM WE CAN NOT ENSURE THAT OUR RESIDENTS ARE…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-02 · tag F0567 — failed to protect residents' money held by the home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to manage his or her financial affairs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on record review and interview, the facility failed to ensure resident funds were placed in an account separate from the facility operating account and did not allow the residents/guardian the right to manage his/her financial affairs. The facility did not provide residents access to their funds as soon as possible for 11 residents (Residents #201, #202, #203, #204, #205, #206, #207, #208, #209, #210 and #211). The facility census was 105. 1. Record review of the facility's maintained Aged Accounts Receivable Report by Service Date for the period 01/01/2021 through 01/31/2022, dated 02/01/22, showed the following residents with personal funds held in the facility operating account: Resident Amount Held in Operating Account #201 $1,654.40 #202 $1,638.00 #203 $2,184.11 #204 $ 107.51 #205 $ 949.61 #206 $ 209.18 #207 $ 524.12 #208 $4,820.00 #209 $3,081.00 #210 $ 509.00 #211 $3,870.00 Total $19,546.93 During correspondence through Email on 02/01/22 at 2:44 P.M., the administrator said refunds were not processed and were missed. The home office could not find a reason why the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-02 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, by not ensuring walls, furniture, water pressure, sinks, soap dispenser, toilet, bed pans, bathroom light and exhaust fan were clean and in good repair. In addition, the facility failed to ensure hot water was available in all residents' sinks and failed to complete an inspection of bed control panels as part of a regular maintenance program to identify areas of possible injuries, such as falls, for two residents (Residents #36 and #5). The sample was 22. The facility census was 105. 1. Observations on 1/24/22 at 7:33 A.M., 1/25/22 at 5:11 A.M., 1/26/22 at 11:01 A.M., and 1/27/22 at 7:43 A.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER], showed large linear gouges in the walls on each side of the sink area that extended vertically, approximately 1 foot in length. 2. Observation on 1/24/22 at 8:59 A.M. and 1/26/22 at 11:03 A.M., of room [ROOM NUMBER], showed: -On the wall on the left side of the sink:…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-02 · tag F0607 — failed to have anti-abuse policies — pattern
    Develop and implement policies and procedures to prevent abuse, neglect, and theft.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to implement written policies and procedures to include the required screening of newly hired staff. Of 10 randomly sampled staff hired in 2021, two failed to have the required criminal background checks, one failed to have the required employee disqualification list check (EDL, a list maintained by the department which lists individuals who are disqualified from working in certified long-term care facilities due to findings of abuse, neglect and/or misappropriation of resident property), and three failed to include nurse aide (NA) registry check to identify federal indicators (FI, indicators linked to certified nursing assistant (CNA) certifications for individuals who have been found guilty of abuse or neglect. These are required to be checked for all staff regardless of the position they are hired for). The census was 105. Review of the facility's Abuse, Neglect and Misappropriation policy, revised 10/27/21, showed: -It is the intent of this facility to employ only properly screened persons as a part of the resident care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-02 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing standards. Staff failed to obtain orders for a continuous positive airway pressure (c-pap, a machine used to provide pressurized air to assist with breathing for individuals with sleep apnea, a condition where they stop breathing while sleeping) for two residents (Residents #50 and #44). Staff failed to obtain urinary catheter orders timely for one resident (Resident #158). The facility identified four residents as having indwelling urinary catheters. Of those four, three were included in the sample and issues were identified with one. Staff failed to obtain tracheostomy (an opening surgically created to the windpipe to provide direct access for breathing) and oxygen orders timely for one resident (Resident #94). In addition, staff failed to provide or document tracheostomy care for one additional resident with a tracheostomy (Resident #15). The facility identified four residents with a tracheostomy. Of those four,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-02 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe environment, when facility staff failed to secure the residents' smoking materials (cigarettes and lighters), which allowed one resident to smoke in his/her bathroom (Resident #23), causing irritation to his/her neighbor (Resident #89). One resident's bathroom smelled of smoke (Resident #8). The facility also failed to reassess four residents for smoking (Resident #23, #37, #8 and #40) per the facility's policy. The facility identified 36 residents who smoke, four residents were chosen for sample and problems were found with all four. The sample was 22. The census was 105. Review of the Facility's Smoking Policy, dated reviewed 5/30/19, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to promote resident centered care by providing a safe smoking area for residents/patients that request to smoke and are capable of safe smoking behaviors either independently or with supervision; -Procedure: Assessment, observation and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-02 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — pattern
    Have a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to use the services of a registered nurse (RN) for at least eight consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week. In addition, the facility failed to ensure the Director of Nursing (DON) did not serve as a charge nurse. The facility census was 105. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, updated 9/30/21, showed: -The purpose of this assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Use this assessment to make decision about direct care staff needs, as well as capabilities to provide services to the residents. Using a competency-based approach, focuses on ensuring that each resident is provided care that allows the resident to maintain or attain their highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being; -Indicate the number of residents the facility is licensed to provide care for: 158; -Average daily census 110; -Facility resources needed to provide competent support and care for or resident population every day and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-02 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored and labeled in accordance with currently accepted practices and included the appropriate expiration date. The facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments. These practices affected three of three medication rooms and four out of nine medication/treatment carts reviewed. The facility identified three medication rooms and nine medication/treatment carts in use at the facility. The census was 105. Review of the facility's Medication Storage Policy, undated, showed: -Policy: Medications and biologicals are stored safely, securely, and properly, following manufacturer's recommendations or those of the supplier. The medication supply is accessible only to licensed nursing personnel, pharmacy personnel, or staff members lawfully authorized to administer medications; -Procedure: Medication rooms, carts, and medication supplies are locked when not attended by persons with…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-02 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure food was served at a safe and appetizing temperature. The census was 105. Review of the facility Dining Services Policy and Procedure Manual, dated 5/2014, and Revised on 9/2017, showed: -Meal Distribution Policy Statement: Meals are transported to the dining locations in a manner that ensures proper temperature maintenance, protects against contamination, and are delivered in a timely and accurate manner; -Procedure: All meals will be assembled in accordance with the individualized diet order, plan of·care, and preferences; -All food items will be transported promptly for appropriate temperature maintenance; -All foods that are transported to dining areas that are not adjacent to the kitchen will be covered; -The nursing staff will be responsible for verifying meal accuracy and the timely delivery of meals to residents/patients; -For point-of-service dining, the Dining Services department staff, under the supervision of the licensed nurse, will…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2022-02-02 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections, when the facility failed to follow their policy for staff tuberculin skin test (TST, used to test for tuberculosis (TB) infections) for eight of 10 randomly sampled employees. The census was 105. Review of the facility's Tuberculin Skin Test 2-step policy, dated 9/7/21, showed: -TST: The standard method of determining whether a person is infected with TB used at the facility level; -2-step method: Step 1- performing a TST with results analyzed within 48-72 hours. Step 2 is repeating the TST in 7-21 days with results analyzed within 48-72 hours. The 2-step method is used to reduce the likelihood of a false negative by providing a boosted reaction with a second dose. A false negative reaction may be due to a viral illness, incorrect TST, or incorrect interpretation of reaction or weakened immune system; -To provide…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2022-02-02 · tag F0924 — pattern
    Put firmly secured handrails on each side of hallways.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure the corridors were equipped with firmly secured handrails on each side. The census was 105. 1. Observation on 1/24/22 at 12:59 P.M., on Serenity hall, showed the handrails on the side of therapy, between the two therapy entrances, loose and wobbly. 2. Observation on 1/31/22 at 2:17 P.M., showed the hall handrail between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS] hung visibly lower than the other handrails on the hall. This handrail had three braces that connected it to the wall. The middle brace broken into two pieces and did not connect the handrail to the wall. The brace on the right side had the two top screws partially unscrewed. The wall cracked where the handrail pulled away from the wall. The brace on the left side had the top two screws partially exposed. 3. Observation on 1/31/22 at 2:18 P.M., of the handrail across from room [ROOM NUMBER] and to the left of the green eyewash station, showed approximately 2 feet of the handrail missing. The handrail appeared…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-02 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing practice when the facility's staff left medications in the one resident's room (Resident #90), who did not have a physician order for self-administration or for medications to be left at bedside. The sample was 22. The census was 105. Review of the facility's Self-Administration of Medication Policy, dated 1/5/22, showed: -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that safeguards the resident's right for self-administration of their own medications that support resident dignity and self-determination; -Procedure: Determine if the resident desires to self-administer their own medication; Physician/provider order is required for resident to self-administer medications; Resident may self-administer some or all of their medications; If only some of the medications will be administered clearly indicate which drug(s) including time and route, by physician order. Review of Resident #90's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-02 · tag F0561 — failed to honor residents' choices — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to and the facility must promote and facilitate resident self-determination through support of resident choice.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents have the right to make choices about aspects of their life in the facility that are significant to the resident, when the facility's staff failed to get one resident up out of bed on the weekend (Resident #90) and failed to offer one resident with an elevated blood sugar, the choice of when to receive their insulin (Resident #61). The sample was 22. The census was 105. Review of the facility's Resident Rights Policy, dated 5/30/19, showed: -Definitions: Dignity, a state of worthy of honor or respect; includes but not limited to speaking respectfully to resident, providing privacy for care and treatment, providing safe and secure housing, sanitary food and hydration, respecting resident choice and attending to needs in a timely fashion; -Policy: It is the policy of this facility to provide resident centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents; -Residents will be…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a resident's physician and responsible party when there was a change in the resident's status that resulted in the need to alter the resident's treatment. The resident experienced a severely low blood sugar level and required the administration of glucagon (used to increase blood sugar levels) for one resident (Resident #161). The census was 105. Review of the facility's Physician Notification for Change in Condition Reporting policy, revised [DATE], showed: -Immediate notification: Any sign, symptom or apparent discomfort that is acute or sudden in onset and is a marked change (i.e. more severe) in relations to the usual symptoms and signs or is unrelieved by measures already prescribed; -It is the policy of this facility to promote resident centered care by using evidence based practice for notification of providers for changes in conditions and when to report signs and symptoms to the physician; -Report immediately: -Chemistry: Blood glucose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-02 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to follow the grievance policy, which required the facility to maintain evidence demonstrating the result of a resident's grievance for a period of no less than three years from the issuance of the grievance decision, for one resident who voiced a grievance to the facility (Resident #16) regarding the housekeeping supervisor. The census was 105. Review of the facility Grievance Policy, dated 1/12/17 and revised on 5/30/19, showed: -Definition: Grievance, an official statement of a complaint over something believed to be wrong or unfair; -Grievance Official: The person designated by the Administrator to receive all grievances to be investigated. This role defaults to the Director of Social Services unless otherwise designed differently by the Administrator; -Policy: -It is the policy of this facility to provide resident person centered care that meets the psychosocial, physical and emotional needs and concerns of the residents. This facility will provide a venue for residents, and others involved in patient care, to voice…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-02 · tag F0586 — isolated
    Not prohibit or in any way discourage a resident from communicating with federal, state, or local officials.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents are able to communicate freely with the state surveyor when the facility's Social Worker confronted the resident after the resident voiced concerns of not being invited to a care plan meeting. This failure affected one resident (Resident #72). The sample size was 22. The census was 105. Review of the Resident #72's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/10/21, showed: -Cognitively intact; -Supervision for Activities of Daily Living (ADL); -Diagnoses included thyroid disorder, arthritis, seizure disorder, and asthma. During an interview on 1/24/22 at 11:59 A.M., the resident said he/she has not been invited to a care plan meeting. He/she was never part of a meeting where staff discussed his/her care in the facility, his/her goals and needs, and interventions to meet those goals. During an interview on 1/31/22 at 8:39 A.M., the Social Worker said the resident has had several meetings with her with his/her family and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed ensure services provided meet professional standards of practice when staff failed to properly assess and follow up after a resident experienced a severely low blood sugar level for one resident (Resident #161). In addition, the facility failed to ensure the physician was notified of blood sugar levels that were out of range per facility policy and physician orders (Resident #8). The sample was 22. The census was 105. Review of the facility's Physician Notification for Change in Condition Reporting policy, revised 8/1/16, showed: -Immediate notification: Any sign, symptom or apparent discomfort that is acute or sudden in onset and is a marked change (i.e. more severe) in relations to the usual symptoms and signs or is unrelieved by measures already prescribed; -It is the policy of this facility to promote resident centered care by using evidence based practice for notification of providers for changes in conditions and when to report signs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-02 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolated
    Provide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide nutritional and hydration services to each resident, consistent with the resident's comprehensive assessment for one resident (Resident #94). Facility staff failed to obtain a physician's order for the type of tube feeding formula, failed to follow dietician recommendations and failed to ensure weights were obtained upon admission or throughout the resident's stay. The facility identified three residents as receiving tube feedings; two were included in the sample and issues with identified with one. The census was 105. Review of Resident #94's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff), dated 12/22/21, showed: -admitted [DATE]; -Cognitive status not assessed; -Total dependence on staff for eating; -Diagnoses include debility (a condition of declining function status with limited prognosis), diabetes, high blood pressure and high cholesterol; -152 pounds; -Nutritional…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-02 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dialysis services received meet professional standards of care and failed to follow their policy for dialysis when facility staff failed to complete pre and post dialysis assessments for two residents (Residents #50 and #44). The facility identified seven residents as receiving dialysis services, two were chosen for sample and issues were found with both. The sample was 22. The census was 105. Review of the facility's Hemodialysis (process for removal of waste and excess water from the blood due to kidney failure) care and monitoring policy, date reviewed 6/24/21, showed: -Pre-dialysis: evaluation completed within four hours of transportation to dialysis to include but not limited to: accurate weight, blood pressure, pulse, respirations and temperature; medication administration or medications withheld prior to dialysis; provide meal or snack prior to leaving for dialysis unless otherwise ordered; send a copy of the nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2022-02-02 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolated
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow acceptable nursing practice and failed to follow their policy, when staff failed to sign the drug count sheet when they administered controlled substances. The sample was 22. The census was 105. Review of the facility's Chain of Custody for Controlled Substances Policy, date reviewed 5/29/19, showed: -Definitions: Medication Administration Record (MAR) the legal record for medication administration documentation; -Narcotics are controlled substances, controlled drugs, and scheduled drugs, drugs that have a high risk for addiction and abuse and are controlled or regulated by Drug Enforcement Act (DEA). -Procedure: Administration of controlled substances: Nurse will sign both the MAR and the drug count sheet when administrating a controlled substance. Observation on 1/25/22 at 9:04 A.M., showed Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B was outside a resident's room. The resident requested a pain pill. LPN B, obtained the pain medication (OxyContin (narcotic) 5 milligram (mg)) from the narcotic box, punched out two…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-02 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 26 opportunities observed, six errors occurred resulting in a 23% error rate (Resident #94). The census was 105. Review of the facility's Medication Administered by Enteral (via gastrointestinal tract) Tube policy, revised 10/5/21, showed: -The purpose of this policy is to provide guidance for the delivery of medications using the enteral tube for residents having a stable enteral tube in place; -Mixing medications may result in a drug interaction that may include occlusion of the tube and does not comply with medication administration practices of administering medication separately; -Administer medication one at a time and follow with a minimum of 30 milliliters (ml) of liquid between medications unless otherwise directed; -This serves to prevent clogging of tube with drug-to-drug interactions -Prepare and validate medications with the electronic medication administration record…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2022-02-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from any significant medication errors. Staff failed to administer a medication for one resident with a diagnosis of kidney failure who required the medication to decrease the level of phosphorous in the blood (Resident #161). Staff failed to administer an antipsychotic injection, ordered for once a month injection, for several months (Resident #48). For both residents, the facility staff documented the medications as administered when they were not administered. This failure puts residents at risk for significant medication errors that go undetected and unreported to the physician, resulting in potential for compilations related to missed doses. The sample was 22. The census was 105. Review of the facility's Facility Assessment Tool, updated 9/30/21, showed: -The purpose of the assessment is to determine what resources are necessary to care for residents competently during both day-to-day operations and emergencies. Use this…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — pattern
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide reasonable accommodations of individual needs and preferences by failing to ensure resident bathrooms included grab bars on walls for stabilization and grab bars on toilets in proper working order for two expanded sampled residents reviewed (Residents #107 and #13) and in seven additional resident rooms. The sample was 25. The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #107's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/13/20, showed the following: -Cognitively intact; -Required limited staff assistance with transfers, personal hygiene, toileting and dressing; -Always continent of bowel and bladder -Diagnoses included: heart failure, diabetes and arthritis. During an interview and observation on 1/29/20 at 10:29 A.M., Resident #107 said there were no grab bars in the bathroom in his/her room. He/she was afraid of falling and was very concerned about it. The resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0569 — pattern
    Notify each resident of certain balances and convey resident funds upon discharge, eviction, or death.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete and send a Third Party Liability (TPL) form (a form which is sent to MO Healthnet which gives an accounting of the remaining balance of that resident's funds in the resident trust account), which is required to be sent within 30 days after the death, for six of six residents who expired and their funds were used for funeral expenses (Residents #300, #301 #302, #303, #304 and #305). The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #300's resident trust account, showed the following: -He/she expired on [DATE]; -On [DATE], the facility wrote a check from the resident's trust account for $1,333.73, to the funeral home; -No notification was issued to the TPL (form MO [PHONE NUMBER]) within 30 days, showing the resident's final accounting. 2. Review of Resident #301's resident trust account, showed the following: -He/she expired on [DATE]; -On [DATE], the facility wrote a check from the resident's trust account for $112.14, to the funeral home; -No…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0576 — pattern
    Ensure residents have reasonable access to and privacy in their use of communication methods.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to protect and facilitate a resident's right to communicate with individuals and entities within and external to the facility, including reasonable access to a computer, for one resident (Resident #78) who was refused the right to the use of a computer. The census was 124. The sample was 25. 1. Observations of the facility on all days of the survey from 1/29-1/31/20 and 2/3-2/5/20, showed no available computers or tablets available for resident use. 2. During an interview on 1/29/20 at 10:20 A.M., the administrator verified the facility had wireless Internet (wifi). 3. Review of Resident #78's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], showed the following: -admission date of 12/21/19; -Cognitively intact; -Required extensive assistance from staff for toileting and limited assistance for personal hygiene and dressing; -Diagnoses included heart failure and diabetes. During an interview on 1/29/20 at 3:01 P.M., the resident said there was no resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to provide a comfortable and homelike environment for all residents when they did not provide comfortable sound levels in the dining room during meals. The facility also failed to maintain walls in good repair in the dining room. The census was 124. The sample was 25. 1. Observations of the dining room, showed the following: -On 1/29/20 from 12:35 P.M. to 1:00 P.M., dietary aide (DA) H walked throughout the dining room loudly calling out resident names. Residents played music on their cell phones at their tables and could be heard across the dining room; -On 1/30/20 at 8:14 A.M., two residents played music on their cell phones which could be heard throughout the dining room. One resident who sat in the assist dining room, attached to the main dining room, sporadically yelled loudly. At 12:29 P.M., multiple residents played music on their cell phones. A loud beeping alarm could be heard from the room across from the dining room where the door to the courtyard was. Multiple residents could be overheard complaining of the alarm…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all physician's orders were followed by not providing wound treatments, ensuring orders for tube feeding were congruent with the care plan, administering oxygen at the proper rate, applying support stockings, obtaining an order for and checking blood sugar levels, obtaining laboratory tests and ensuring a care plan was updated with the removal of a gastrostomy tube (G-tube, a tube surgically inserted into the stomach to provide hydration, nutrition and medications), for nine (Residents #61, #78, #33, #221, #91, #107, #38, #74 and #93) of 25 sampled residents. The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #61's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/17/19, showed the following: -Total dependence on staff for bed mobility, transfers and dressing; -Moderate cognitive impairment; -One unstageable (slough (dead tissue) is present, the actual base and condition of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received showers as scheduled and on a consistent basis by failing to provide documentation showing four of 18 sampled residents received showers/baths, failed to shave one resident on a consistent basis and failed to provide fingernail care and cleanse one resident's contracted hands. These deficient practices affected five of 25 sampled residents (Residents #93, #27, #74, #371 and #39). The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #93's significant change Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/6/20, showed the following: -Moderate cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance required by staff for all mobility and personal care; -Diagnoses included stroke, aphasia (inability to verbally communicate), hemiplegia (paralysis to one side of the body) and diabetes. Review of the shower sheets and Certified Nurse Aide (CNA) task sheets, dated 1/6/20 through 2/4/20,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — pattern
    Provide activities to meet all resident's needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide, based on the comprehensive assessment, care plan and preferences of each resident, an ongoing program to support residents in their choice of activities, designed to meet the interests of and support the physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being of each resident, for four of 25 sampled residents (Residents #39, #93, #27 and #4). The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/18/19, showed the following: -admitted on [DATE]; -Severe cognitive impairment; -Total dependence on staff for self care including personal hygiene, bathing, dressing and toileting; -Preferred activities: staff left blank; -No speech, absence of spoken words; -Rarely/never understands/is understood; -Special treatments while a resident: oxygen therapy, suctioning and tracheotomy care (tube surgically inserted into the trachea for the purpose…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow their policy and the manufacturer's recommendations during transfers with a Hoyer lift (mechanical lift used to transfer a resident from one surface to another), resulting in failure to protect one resident from injury during a transfer (Resident #101) and failed to safely transfer two additional residents (Resident's #61 and #76). The facility also failed to follow their smoking policy by not assessing residents for smoking safety and allowing residents to keep smoking paraphernalia on their person (Residents #108, #109, #38, #221 and #33). Additionally, the facility failed to ensure the safety of residents during independent leave of absence (LOA) by not following their policy to obtain physician orders (Residents #38 and 109). The facility also failed to prevent access to razors by leaving them available in resident rooms, which were not locked, and available to all residents who were able to move freely around the facility. The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — pattern
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain complete physician's orders for indwelling urinary catheters (a tube inserted into the bladder for the purpose of continual urine drainage) and failed to maintain proper placement of catheter tubing and drainage bag. The facility identified seven residents as having indwelling and/or supra pubic urinary catheters (a sterile tube inserted into the bladder through the abdominal wall to drain urine). Of those seven, three were chosen for the sample and problems found with two (Residents #110 and #47). The sample was 25. The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #110's medical record, showed the following: -A face sheet, showed an admission date of 1/10/20; -Diagnoses included dysphagia (difficulty in swallowing) and stroke. Review of an admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 1/16/20, showed the following: -Severely impaired cognition; -Diagnoses included…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide thorough assessments, orders, monitoring and ongoing communication with the dialysis center for three (Residents# 371, #220 and #61) residents. The facility identified five residents who received dialysis. Of those five, three were chosen for the sample of 25, and problems were found with all three. The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #371's quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/29/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Extensive assistance with dressing, toileting and personal hygiene; -Special treatments: Dialysis (the mechanical purification of blood as a substitute for the normal function of the kidney); -Diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD-Kidney failure) and heart disease. Review of the care plan, dated 2/18/19 and last updated 11/23/19, showed the following: -Problem: Required hemodialysis…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0730 — pattern
    Observe each nurse aide's job performance and give regular training.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure certified nurse aides (CNA)s received the required 12 hours of training and had a system to track the hours for five of five employees reviewed who worked at the facility for over a year. The census was 124. Review of the training records provided by the facility, showed the following: -A total of 26 CNAs worked at the facility for over a year; -CNA K -received 10.5 hours of training; -CNA L-received 5 hours of training; -CNA U-received 5.25 hours of training; -CNA V-received 5 hours of training; -CNA W- received 7.25 hours of training. During an interview on 2/4/20 at 7:15 A.M., the administrator said each CNA had education on a training site utilized by the facility and it was each employee's responsibility to complete the training. They also had a lot of inservicing provided and staff were responsible to attend. Staff sign a sign in sheet and time is recorded on the sign in sheet, however, no one kept track of how many hours each CNA had and no one documented the hours for each CNA.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — pattern
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the attending physician documented timely in the resident's medical record that the irregularities identified during the monthly medication regimen review (MRR) had been reviewed and what, if any, action had been taken to address it, and failed to have all MRRs documented, for four of 25 sampled residents. (Residents #61, #33, #27 and #371) The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #61's medical record, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included end stage renal disease (ESRD, kidney failure), depression, schizophrenia (long term mental condition affecting thought, emotion and behavior), atrial fibrillation (A-fib-irregular heartbeat) and diabetes; -Pharmacy medication regimen reviews (MRRs), completed on 10/21/19 and 11/19/19, with noted irregularities; -No documentation in the record regarding what the irregularities were, if the physician reviewed the identified irregularities and if action had been taken.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — pattern
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure as needed (PRN) psychiatric medications were re-evaluated after 14 days of use for three of 25 sampled residents (Residents #62, #371 and #52). The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #62's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 12/16/19, showed the following: -No cognitive impairment; -Unable to ambulate; -Dependent on staff for transfers and toileting; -Received antianxiety zero of seven days; -Diagnoses included stroke, hemiplegia (paralysis on one side of the body), bipolar (mental illness that causes extreme highs and extreme lows and anxiety). Review of the physician's order sheet (POS) showed an order, dated 11/28/19, to administer Clonazepam (antianxiety) 0.5 milligrams (mg) one tablet every 12 hours PRN for anxiety. Review of the November and December, 2019, medication administration records (MAR)s, showed no administration of Clonazepam. Review of the January,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — pattern
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate of less than 5%. Out of 27 opportunities observed, four errors occurred, resulting in a 14.81% error rate (Resident's #26, #54 and #58). The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #26's medical record, showed the following: -Diagnoses included dementia and diabetes; -An order, dated 1/10/20, to administer Flonase nasal spray (treats allergic and non-allergic nasal symptoms) one spray in each nostril daily. Observation on 1/30/20 at 8:10 A.M., showed Certified Medication Technician (CMT) Q, administered the resident's morning medications. He/she administered two sprays of Flonase into each nostril. He/she did not have the resident blow his/her nose before administration and did not block the opposite nostril. 2. Review of Resident #54's medical record, showed the following: -Diagnoses included osteoporosis (brittle bones) and Vitamin D deficiency; -An order, dated 3/26/19, to administer Calcitonin (used to treat bone loss for people with osteoporosis) nasal spray one spray into…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure insulin vials and flexpens (pre-filled injectable insulin device) were dated once opened, labeled with resident's name, and failed to discard opened, outdated insulin vials and/or insulin flexpens for three of three medication carts checked. The census was 124. 1. Observation on [DATE] at 6:45 A.M., of the Harmony Hall medication cart, showed the following: -One Humulin 70/30 (combination form of long acting) insulin vial opened without date written when opened; -One Humalog (fast acting) insulin flexpen opened without date written when opened; -One Levemir (long acting) insulin flexpen opened without date written when opened; -One Novolog (fast acting) insulin flexpen opened, not dated when opened and not labeled with resident's name; -One Novolog insulin flexpen, opened dated [DATE] or [DATE], date not legible when opened; -Three Novolog insulin flexpens opened without date written when opened; -One Humulin 70/30 insulin flexpen…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to prevent possible cross contamination of the residents' food during preparation and service when staff did not use safe food handling techniques and failed to ensure the air conditioning vents and filters remained free of dust during five of five days of observation. The census was 124. 1. Observation 1/30/20 at 7:52 A.M., of breakfast service, showed [NAME] P stood at the steam table wearing gloves. As [NAME] P received orders, he/she used his/her gloved hands to place French toast and bacon on plates which were then served to residents. [NAME] P used his/her gloved hands to place food on plates at least four times. He/she then used the same gloved hands to take bread out of a bag and scrape off the griddle with a metal spatula. He/she then placed food on three additional plates. [NAME] P then took syrup and poured it over French toast. At 7:58 A.M., the dietary manager gave [NAME] P tongs and instructed him/her to use them to plate the food. 2. Observation on 1/31/20 at 6:04 A.M. to 6:15 A.M., showed [NAME] P used gloved…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-02-05 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — pattern
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure garbage dumpsters outside the facility were kept closed to prevent access to rodents and pests, during four of four days of observation. The facility census was 124. Observations of the outdoor dumpsters, showed the following: -On 1/30/20 from 7:30 A.M. to 12:08 P.M., two dumpsters with open lids. The green dumpster had cardboard boxes spilling out. The blue dumpster had numerous bags of trash spilling out and on to the ground. At least nine bags of trash lay on the ground next to the dumpster. At 12:57 P.M., two dietary aides (DA) took a large black trash bag (splitting open) and tossed it onto a pile of trash bags on the ground around the dumpsters, then walked away. The lids to the blue and green garbage dumpsters remained opened; -On 1/31/20 at 9:54 A.M., both lids remained open with bags of trash piled at least 4 feet above the top of the dumpster. One lid on the blue dumpster was broken and turned upwards. The green dumpster had one side of the lid open. At 11:55 A.M., both dumpsters had open lids, and the trash…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-02-05 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — pattern
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staff follow acceptable infection control practices during wound treatment and blood glucose testing (BGT) for two of 25 sampled residents (Residents #75 and #18). In addition, the facility failed to ensure three of nine employees reviewed, received their two step tuberculosis (TB) skin test upon date of hire and ensure one additional employee had a current chest x-ray or screen to rule out TB symptoms. The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #75's electronic medical record, showed the following: -admission date of 9/18/19; -Diagnoses included deep vein thrombosis (DVT, blood clot usually in the lower leg). Observation on 1/30/20 at 9:30 A.M., showed Nurse C washed his/her hands, applied gloves, did not clean the scissors with a disinfecting agent and/or bleach wipe prior to use, and cut off the dressing from the resident's left lower leg, which had three open wounds. Nurse C said the open areas on the resident's left lower leg were vascular ulcers (ulcers caused by problems in the vascular system)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one resident remained free from restraints, conduct a restraint assessment and obtain a physician's order for the use of a restraint (Resident #27). The facility identified no residents with restraints. The sample size was 25. The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #27's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/18/19, showed the following: -Severe cognitive impairment; -Extensive assistance of two staff required for bed mobility and transfers; -Dependent on staff for bathing, eating, toileting and locomotion; -Impairment to both upper extremities (UEs) and both lower extremities (LEs); -Diagnoses included cerebral palsy (CP-damage to the brain and affects movement and posture), schizophrenia (long term mental condition affecting thought, emotion and behavior) and seizures. Review of the resident's care plan, dated 10/25/19 and last updated on 1/13/20, showed the following: -Problem: Resident uses a tilt in space (reclining)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-02-05 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Basedonobservation interviewandrecordreview the facilityfailedtoensureone resident (Resident #39) withlimitedrangeofmotion(ROM receivedappropriatetreatmentsandservicestoincreaseROMandorpreventfurtherdecreaseinROM after identifying the issues on the resident's care plan. The facilityalso failedtoperformrestorativetherapyforone resident per physician order (Resident#61). The sample was 25. The census was 124. 1. Review of Resident #39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/18/19, showed the following: -admission date of 11/11/19; -Severe cognitive impairment; -Non verbal; -Total dependence on staff for self care including personal hygiene, bathing, dressing and toileting; -Functional limitation in ROM with impairment on both sides; -Diagnoses included: seizure disorder, acute respiratory failure, anoxic brain injury (lack of oxygen to the brain), cardiac arrest and drug poisoning. Review of the resident's care plan, last revised on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure dental care and services were provided to one sampled resident who requested dental services and required to be fitted for dentures (Resident #38) out of 25 sampled residents. The census was 124. Review of Resident #38's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS), a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff, dated 11/29/19, showed the following: -admitted on [DATE]; -Cognitive impairment; -Independent with all self care activities; -No natural teeth; -Diagnoses included: heart failure, end stage renal disease, diabetes, at risk for malnutrition and seizure disorder. Review of the resident's care plan, last revised on 11/23/19, and in use during the survey, showed the following: -Problem: Edentulous (no teeth). Resident recently had decaying teeth pulled; -Goal: Will be free of infection, pain or bleeding in the oral cavity by/through review date; -Interventions included: Consult with dietitian and change diet if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-02-05 · tag F0849 — isolated
    Arrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop a baseline care plan for a new resident who elected hospice care that included appropriate care and services, include the provider of hospice services on the resident's physician's orders and establish the process for communication between the hospice aide and the facility. The facility identified six residents as receiving hospice care and three were chosen for the sample. Of those three, problems were found with one (Resident #271). The census was 124. Review of Resident #271's face sheet, showed the following: -admitted to the facility on [DATE]; -Diagnoses included kidney disease, encephalopathy (brain disease, damage, or malfunction), atrial fibrillation (A-fib-irregular heartbeat), high blood pressure, diabetes and sepsis (blood infection). Review of the resident's physician's order sheet (POS), dated 1/24/20 through 1/31/20, showed an order, dated 1/25/20, to admit to hospice with the name of the hospice provider not documented. Review…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • No harm found · C2024-08-14 · tag F0623 — widespread
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify a representative of the State Long-Term Care (LTC) Ombudsman of resident transfers and discharges. The census was 120. During an interview on 8/7/24 at 12:26 P.M., the Ombudsman said he/she had not received a monthly transfer report from the facility since April 2024. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 6:57 A.M., the Social Services Director (SSD) said she is responsible for notifying the Ombudsman of resident transfers on a monthly basis. By the 5th of each month, she emails the Ombudsman with a list of all residents discharged from the facility the month before. When asked to provide documentation of Ombudsman notification since April 2024, the SSD said she did not have access to her old email due to the facility's recent change in ownership. During an interview on 8/14/24 at 1:22 P.M., the Administrator said the SSD is responsible for notifying the Ombudsman of resident transfers and discharges. The SSD is expected to notify the Ombudsman during the first week of the month. The Administrator was not aware the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$90,333 in federal fines across 3 penalties. 2 Medicare payment denials on record.

  • $26,685 — penalty dated 2026-02-05
  • $16,149 — penalty dated 2025-06-20
  • $47,499 — penalty dated 2025-03-04
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-03-07 for 35 days
  • Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-11-14 for 6 days

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 4 of 54.3-0.3 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Carmel Hills Wellness & RehabilitationIndependence, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleShareSince
WILDFLOWER HEALTHCARE LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST100%since 07/30/2024
BLOOMING WILLOW PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/30/2024
DERHOBEN TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/30/2024
PAS B SOL TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/30/2024
DAVIDOVICH, NIVIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/30/2024
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividual5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTNO PERCENTAGE PROVIDEDsince 07/30/2024
250 S NEW FLORISSANT ROAD MO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
BROOK PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
KNOBEL REALTY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
LINZ TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
REMBRANDT REALTY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
SESAME REALTY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
WILLOWBROOK INVESTORS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 08/16/1966
MINDLE, ADAMIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 07/30/2024
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividual5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTERESTsince 07/30/2024
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualCORPORATE OFFICER; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
AMIN, IQBALIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024
ULRICH, AMBERIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNFsince 07/30/2024

CMS files one row per role, so the 29 rows in the source record cover these 19 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted.

11 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$9.2M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
-20.0%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$1.5M
Related-party expense14% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 91%Medicare 3%Other / private 6%

About 91% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.5M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 14% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$292per resident / day
operating cost
$8,890per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$244per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265607. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-08-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next