Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, The
1800 S Swope Drive, Independence, MO 64057 · For profit - Corporation · 130 certified beds · (816) 257-2566 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- CMS has flagged it for abuse
- it has abuse, neglect, or exploitation citations (F0600, F0602) — most recent Jan 2026
- it has a citation for mishandling residents’ money or property (F0565)
- inspectors cited 3 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (56) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $71,208 in federal fines (most recent 2025-01-10)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (74%) runs well above the national median (45%)
- about 25% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 5 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 5 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 5 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 5.3% | 18.1% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.8% | 5.3% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 1.1% | 0.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.5% | 2.3% | 2.0% | better |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 31.2% | 18.5% | 6.5% | worse than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 0.7% | 4.1% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.0% | 17.4% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 21.6% | 25.6% | 18.9% | worse |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.0% | 90.9% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.7% | 4.5% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 18.8% | 17.8% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 13.1% | 23.5% | 17.1% | better |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.5% | 2.2% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 35.6% | 63.5% | 79.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 21.5% | 26.0% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 6.7% | 13.7% | 12.0% | better |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.94 | 2.11 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 0.61 | 2.33 | 1.80 | better |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
42.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 35 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 68.8% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 32 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 31% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 5% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 42.6%CMS range 27.6–56.2 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 11.4%CMS range 7.7–14.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 68.8% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 56.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 59.4% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 100.0% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 0.0% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.8%CMS range 3.5–10.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 130 beds and averages 121.7 residents a day — about 94% occupied, or roughly 8 beds typically open. It runs fairly full. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.68 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.18 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.83 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.33 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.82 on weekdays — 17% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.20 to 0.13 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 74% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
56 citations, most serious first. The 15 most serious are shown; the remaining 41 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2021-04-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to monitor and assess for signs and symptoms of infection which lead to one resident (Resident #97) acquiring osteomyelitis and necrosis and eventually partial amputation of his/her finger; failed to follow discharge orders including daily weights, failed to follow subsequent physician's orders for weekly weights, failed to get clarification on conflicting orders for obtaining weights, and failed to notify the physician of excessive weight gain which resulted in one closed record sampled resident (Resident #501) who gained a total of 112.5 pounds (lbs.) from 1/7/21 to 2/1/21 and failed to follow physician orders including daily weights and notifying the physician of weight changes for one sampled resident (Resident #84) out of 22 sampled residents and 16 closed record sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. The Administrator was notified on 5/27/21 at 12:56 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 4/5/21. The IJ was removed on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2021-04-14 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure an unwitnessed injury, to the second finger of a resident who was severely cognitively impaired was thoroughly investigated and to immediately put interventions in place to prevent further injury. Within less than 30 days the resident sustained a similar injury to his/her third finger. The facility failed to thoroughly investigate the second injury and failed to immediately put interventions in place to prevent further injury. This affected one sampled resident (Resident #97) out of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. The Administrator was notified on 5/27/21 at 12:56 P.M. of an Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) which began on 4/5/21. The IJ was removed on 4/14/21 as confirmed by surveyor onsite verification. Record review of the facility's Care Planning policy, dated 6/2020 showed: -A comprehensive, person-centered Care Plan will be developed for each resident to meet the resident's needs. -Changes will be made to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2021-04-14 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of Resident #502's admission Record dated 4/7/21 showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Atrial Fibrillation (A-fib the upper two chambers of the heart beat quickly and irregularly) and Hypertension (HTN High Blood Pressure). Record review of the resident's admission MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -The resident was admitted on [DATE]. -Had moderately impaired cognition. -Had a diagnosis of A-fib and HTN. Record review of the resident's Order Summary Report dated January 2021 showed: -Losartan Potassium Tablet 50 mg, give one tablet in the morning for HTN, start 12/1/20. --Parameters: Hold for Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP-measures the pressure in your arteries when the heart beats) less than 110, Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP-measure the pressure in your arteries when your heart rests between beats) less than 60 (normal blood pressure is SBP 120 over DBP 80) or Pulse (heart rate (HR) heart beats per minute normal heart rate at…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and a review of medical records, the facility failed to identify and implement the necessary care and services to address the needs of diabetic residents. Specifically, facility staff failed to: 1. Recognize and appropriately respond to signs and symptoms of hyperglycemia, such as changes in mental status, feelings of anger, excessive hunger, excessive thirst, and frequent urination. 2. Implement blood glucose monitoring as ordered by the medical provider. Failed to transcribe and/or verify insulin orders and blood glucose monitoring with the physician upon admission. 3. Administer insulin as ordered by the medical provider resulting in the resident becoming physically and verbally combative, excessively hungry, resulting in hypoglycemia and a blood sugar of 541. This deficient practice contributed to the subsequent hospitalization of one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for hospitalization from a total of 36 residents sampled (Resident #101). The findings include: According to Mayo Clinic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · G2023-06-13 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #18) was free from resident to resident abuse. On 5/31/23 around 2:00 A.M., Resident #78 struck Resident #18 with a wooden back scratcher resulting in multiple bruises to his/her face, arms, legs, and lower rib cage; a broken left pinky finger; and laceration to his/her head that required 5 staples. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the undated Facility Abuse and Prohibition Program policy showed: -The purpose of the policy included ensuring a standardized methodology for the prevention of abuse. -Each resident had the right to be free from abuse. -The facility was committed to protecting the residents from abuse by anyone. 1. Review of Resident #78's Level One Nursing Facility Pre-admission Screening for Mental Illness/Mental Retardation or Related Condition, dated 8/13/21, showed the resident did not show any signs or symptoms of mental illness. Review of Resident #78's face sheet…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-27 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to prevent misappropriation for one sampled resident (Resident #4) when Social Services Director (SSD) used the resident's debit card to pay his/her personal cell phone bill in the amount of $350.00 out of seven sampled residents. The facility census was 121 residents.On 1/28/26 the Administrator and Director of Nursing were notified of past non-compliance which occurred on 1/21/26. On 1/21/26 the facility Administrator was notified of the incident and the investigation was started. No employees were allowed to work prior to reeducation completed 1/21/26. SSD was terminated on 1/22/26. The deficiency was corrected on 1/22/26. Review of the facility's Abuse Prevention and Prohibition Program dated 10/24/22 showed: -Each resident has the right to be free from mistreatment, neglect, abuse, involuntary seclusion and misappropriation of property.-The facility is committed to protect residents from abuse by anyone, including but not limited residents, family members, legal guardians, surrogates, sponsors, friends, and visitors.-The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-12 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician was notified of all injuries sustained after a fall for one sampled resident (Resident #1) out of eight sampled residents. The facility census was 118 residents. Review of the facility Fall Evaluation and Prevention Policy dated 8/2020 showed: -Following a fall, the following steps should be undertaken: --Evaluate the resident promptly in order to identify and treat injuries. --Monitor closely for indications of pain or discomfort in any areas, reddened or discolored areas or other signs of injury. Review of the facility Change of Condition Notification Policy dated 6/2020 showed: -To ensure residents, family, legal representatives, and physicians are informed of changes in the residents condition in a timely manner. -Acute change of condition (ACOC) is a sudden, clinically important deviation from a patient's baseline in physical, cognitive, behavioral, or functional domains. -Clinically important means a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespreadProvide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, and record review, facility leadership failed to maintain adequate nursing staffing, as established by the facility's leadership, to provide appropriate nursing care and services to meet the needs of residents. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents living in the facility. The findings included: 1. Due to the scope and severity deficient practice found during the survey, facility leadership was asked to produce daily staffing hours for the month of December 2024. A review of the facility's daily staffing hours revealed: - On 12/8/24, the facility's census was 95. Actual nursing staff hours worked was 2.68 PPD. - On 12/9/24, the facility's census was 95. Actual nursing staff hours worked was 2.57 PPD. - On 12/10/24, the facility's census was 95. Actual nursing staff hours worked was 2.54 PPD. - On 12/11/24, the facility's census was 96. Actual nursing staff hours worked was 2.72 PPD. - On 12/12/24, the facility's census was 96. Actual nursing staff hours worked was 2.70 PPD. - On 12/13/24, the facility's census was 92. Actual nursing…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — widespreadEnsure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on resident interviews, a resident council meeting, observations, and an observation of a test tray meal evaluation, the facility failed to provide palatable foods per resident preferences for taste and temperature as evidenced by improper temperatures. This deficient practice had the potential to affect residents residing on four (4) out of five (5) units eating meals from the kitchen. The findings include: 1. During the initial tour of the facility on 1/7/25 at approximately 10:00 a.m., through 1:00 p.m., the following residents verbalized a concern with the quality of the food and food temperatures: Resident #12 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including anemia, hemiplegia and heart failure. The most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS), dated [DATE], Revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 14, indicating intact cognition. Resident #12 stated at 10:30 a.m., that the food was usually cold. She /he didn't think it was dietary's fault. The resident said that the trays sat…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2025-01-10 · tag F0868 — widespreadHave the Quality Assessment and Assurance group have the required members and meet at least quarterly
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interviews and record review, the facility was unable to provide documentation of regular Quality Assurance Performance Improvement Plan (QAPI) meetings and evidence of participation by the required parties. This affected all facility residents. The findings include: During an interview on 1/10/25 at 12:20 p.m., the Administrator reported the committee's plan was to meet monthly, but he/she could not locate all the verification of attendance for the QAPI meetings held since the last survey in June of 2023. The Administrator provided QAPI verification of attendance records, and a documentation review was completed for meetings held June 2024, August 2024, September 2024, and October 2024. There was no additional evidence of required meetings, and no additional documentation regarding those in attendance at the required meetings.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident's right to a dignified existence, including being treated with respect during all care interactions for three (3) of three (3) residents observed for dignity (Resident #66, Resident #82 and Resident #39). The findings included: Review of the facility's policy titled Adaptive Equipment-Feeding Devices with a revision date of 12/2020 noted: Adaptive feeding equipment is used by residents who need to improve their ability to feed themselves and in order to enable residents with physically disabling conditions to improve their eating functions. 1. Resident #39 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury with Loss of Consciousness, Cerebral Infarction due to Occlusion of Stenosis of Small Artery, Morbid Obesity, Muscle Weakness and Repeated Falls. Record review of Resident #39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0565 — failed to support the resident council — patternHonor the resident's right to organize and participate in resident/family groups in the facility.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to appropriately address and resolve grievances raised during previous resident council meetings. Residents voiced specific concerns regarding food, missing laundry items, and not receiving showers over numerous monthly meetings. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents who resided in the facility. The census on the first day of survey entrance was 96 residents. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 7/3/24, revealed that residents reported they were not receiving showers. Record review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 9/4/24, revealed that residents reported they were not receiving showers and reported that the Dietary department ran out of milk and yogurt. Record review of Resident Council Meeting Minutes dated 10/2/24, revealed that residents reported that they were not getting their clothes back from the laundry department in a timely fashion and residents were running out of clothing. Record review of Resident Council Meeting…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received the necessary nursing care and services for activities of daily living by failing to 1) Provide residents with showers in accordance with bathing schedules for two residents (Resident #2 and Resident #58) and 2) Provide residents requiring assistance with toileting the necessary care and services to transfer on and off the toilet for one (1) of six (6) residents reviewed (Resident #70), and 3) Ensure that two (2) of 36 residents sampled (Resident #39 and Resident #82) were provided with personal hygiene care and/or adaptive eating equipment in accordance with their preference and Care Plans. The findings included: Cross-Reference to F725 Sufficient Nursing Staff Review of the facility policy, Showering a Resident, undated, documented Purpose: A shower bath is given to the residents to provide cleanliness, comfort and to prevent body odors. Policy: Residents are offered a shower at a minimum of once weekly and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2025-01-10 · tag F0850 — failed to provide social-work services — patternHire a qualified full-time social worker in a facility with more than 120 beds.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews, credential review and review of facility policy, the facility failed to employ a qualified social worker as mandated for facilities with greater than 120 beds. This failure affected 96 of 96 residents at the facility. The findings include: 1. Review of the provided Job Description for position 7001 Social Worker, Revised December 2023, revealed License Qualification: LSW, LCSW or LMSW [Licensed Social Worker, Licensed Clinical Social Worker or Licensed Master of Social Work]: Qualifications * Certified, licensed, or registered in the state of practice, required. * Bachelor's Degree in Social Work or a bachelor's degree in Human Services field including but not limited to Sociology, Special Education, Rehabilitation Counseling and Psychology from an accredited school of social work, required. * One year of supervised social work experience in a healthcare setting working directly with geriatric individuals. Review of credentials for the Social Worker (SW) revealed that he/she held a Bachelor of Arts in Human Services. The SW was not a licensed by state as…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-01-10 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that residents received wound care in a manner to prevent infections for two (2) of two (2) residents observed for wound care (Resident #26 and Resident #82), and 2) Failed to implement Enhanced Barrier Precautions as indicated by the resident's plan of care for one (1) of three (3) residents reviewed from a total of 36 residents sampled. The findings included: 1. Review of the facility's policy titled, Hand Hygiene revised 6/2020, revealed the purpose of the policy was to ensure that all individuals used the appropriate hand hygiene while in the facility. The hand hygiene policy did not address when to wash hands or don gloves prior to providing care. Review of the facility's policy titled, Dressing-Application and Technique revised 6/2020, revealed, .C. Wash hands before and after each procedure, and put on gloves. Resident # 82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 41 citations
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0559 — isolatedHonor the resident's right to share a room with spouse or roommate of choice and receive written notice before a change is made.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interviews and facility policy, the facility staff failed to protect the rights of a resident whose room was changed without notice prior to the change for one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for room changes. Resident #65 left the facility for an appointment and returned to learn his/her belongings had been moved to another room. The findings include: Review of facility policy titled Room or Roommate Change Version 1.0, Revised 8/2020 revealed the policy's Purpose -To ensure that a resident is able to exercise their right to change rooms or roommates .Procedure -III. Prior to changing a room assignment, the resident, the resident's representative (if available), the resident's new roommate, will be given timely advance notice of such change according to state and federal regulations. A. When the resident is being moved at the request of the Facility, the notice of a change in room assignment will be in writing and will include the reason(s) for the change. B. Social Services Staff will assist in orienting the resident to his or her new room and/or roommate. 1. Resident…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure appropriate notification following a fall during a transfer for one (1) of 36 residents sampled (Resident #39). Resident # 39 reported falling while being transferred from a wheelchair to the bed by Restorative Nursing Aide (RNA) AA and Maintenance Supervisor. The staff involved did not notify the nurse or physician of the incident, as required. This deficient practice compromised the resident's right to prompt assessment and care and potentially placed the resident at risk for unrecognized or untreated injuries. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], revealed an admission date of 12/24/24, and a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 13 which indicated the resident was cognitively intact. Resident #39 was coded as dependent for a chair/bed to chair transfer. Continued review revealed diagnoses which included Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide documentation of appropriate notification of pending benefit changes to Medicare services for one (1) of three (3) residents sampled for beneficiary notices (Resident #90). The findings include: 1. The 1/10/25 review of the notices given to three (3) residents selected from the form entitled Beneficiary Notice - Residents discharged Within the Last Six Months (provided to the facility during the Entrance Conference) revealed none was available for 1 of 3 sampled residents, Resident #90. In an interview, the Social Worker (SW) on 1/10/25 at 2:28 p.m. reported not being in the position until August 2024 and the SW was unable to provide proof of notification letters sent to Resident #90.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0623 — isolatedProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and the resident's representative of a facility-initiated emergency transfer to an acute care hospital. This deficient practice affected one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for hospitalizations from a total of 36 residents sampled (Resident #101). The findings include: The facility's policy governing resident transfer and discharge processes was reviewed. The policy, titled Transfer and Discharge was dated 10/24/22. The policy directed staff from Social Services (or a designee) to prepare a written transfer notice to send with the resident in the event of an emergency transfer. 1. A review of Resident #101's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/28/24. His/her medical history included metabolic encephalopathy, hemiparesis affecting his/her left side, and history of CVA. A comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) was not completed as the resident was admitted on [DATE] and discharged on 10/29/24. Resident #101 did not return…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0625 — isolatedNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to provide the resident and the resident's representative with a written notice of the facility's bed-hold policy upon transferring a resident to an acute care hospital. This deficient practice affected one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for hospitalizations from a total of 36 residents sampled (Resident #101). The findings included: The facility's policy governing resident transfer and discharge processes was reviewed. The policy, titled Transfer and Discharge was dated 10/24/22. The policy directed staff to provide a resident and a resident representative with a written notice which specified the duration of the resident's bed-hold at the time of transfer. 1. A review of Resident #101's medical record revealed an admission date of 10/28/24. His/her medical history included metabolic encephalopathy, hemiparesis affecting his/her left side, and history of CVA. A comprehensive minimum data set (MDS) was not completed as the resident was admitted on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of a skin assessment when the corresponding assessment did not reflect the actual condition of the skin for one (1) of 36 residents sampled (Resident #39). Inaccurate documentation compromised the facility's ability to provide appropriate and timely care, potentially putting the resident at risk for further complications. The findings included: 1. A review of Resident #39's electronic health record revealed an admission date of 12/24/24, with diagnoses that included Diffuse Traumatic Brain Injury with Loss of Consciousness, Cerebral Infarction due to Occlusion of Stenosis of Small Artery, Morbid Obesity, Muscle Weakness and Repeated Falls. A further review of Resident #39's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE], noted a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) summary score of 13, which indicated the resident's cognition was intact. Section M of the MDS noted Moisture Associated Skin Damage (MASD), and no other…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician ordered urinalysis (UA) sample in a timely manner for Resident #5, one (1) of one (1) resident reviewed for laboratory results from a total of 36 residents sampled. The findings include: 1. Resident #5 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including but not limited to cellulitis, heart disease, anemia, morbid obesity, infection of unspecified joint, pain and diabetes with diabetic neuropathy. Review of the clinical health record for Resident #5 revealed a physician's order dated 1/3/24 for a UA. On 1/9/25 the laboratory results were requested from the Director of Nursing Services (DON) with reminders provided as other requests were completed. In an interview on 1/10/25 at 5:10 p.m., the DON reported that the 1/3/25 physician's order was executed on 1/10/25 and the sample was earlier that day. There was no reason provided for the delay in obtaining the sample.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and policy review, the facility did not provide meaningful activities on the weekends for two (2) residents (Resident #58 and Resident #78), and did not get one (1) resident out of bed for activities that they wanted to attend (Resident #39) out of 36 residents sampled. The findings include: The facility's policy Activities Program, revised 6/2020, documented under Purpose: To encourage residents to participate in activities to make life more meaningful, to stimulate and support physical and mental capabilities to the fullest extent, and to enable the resident to maintain the highest attainable social, physical and emotional functioning. Listed under Policy: The facility provides an Activity Program designed to meet the needs, interests, and preferences of residents. The activities are varied and work to address the needs and interests identified through the assessment process. The Activity Program may address areas including but not limited: A. Social Activities: B. Indoor ad…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the environment was as free from accident hazards by failing to 1) Ensure residents smoked only in the areas designated by the facility's safety committee in accordance with the facility's policy; and 2) Supervise residents while they smoked in accordance with the facility's policy. This deficient practice affected two (2) of four (4) residents reviewed for accident hazards related to smoking from a total of 36 residents sampled (Resident #13 and Resident #20). The findings include: The facility's policy governing practices for residents who smoke was reviewed. The policy, titled Smoking by Residents contained a revision date of November 2023. The policy's purpose read, To respect resident choice to smoke and to maintain a safe healthy environment for both smokers and non-smokers. Section II of the policy read, The facility permits smoking only in the area(s) designated by the Facility's Safety Committee. Line X of the procedure read, All smoking sessions will be supervised by Facility Staff members.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolatedProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, record review, and review of the facility policy, the facility failed to ensure that perineal care was provided in a manner to prevent urinary tract infection for one (1) of 36 residents sampled (Resident #82). The finding included: Review of the facility policy titled, Perineal Care revised 6/2020 revealed the procedures for performing Perineal care, as follows: .A. For female residents: i. Separate the labia. Wash with soapy washcloth/cleansing wipe, moving from front to back, on each side of the labia and in the center over the urethra and vaginal opening, using a clean washcloth/cleansing wipe for each stroke. ii. Rinse area, moving from front to back, using clean washcloth/cleansing wipe for each stroke. iii. Dry area moving from front to back, using a blotting motion with towel. 1. Resident #82 was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included Ventricular Tachycardia, Overactive Bladder, Major Depressive Disorder and Chronic Pain Syndrome. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-01-10 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolatedEnsure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observations, interviews, and record review, facility staff failed to ensure residents fed by enteral means receive the appropriate treatment and services to maintain the resident's nutritional status by failing to monitor the resident's intake and administer supplemental tube feedings for meal intakes less than 50%. This deficient practice affected one (1) of two (2) residents reviewed for tube feeding from a total of 36 residents sampled. (Resident #73) The findings included: 1. A review of Resident #73's medical record revealed an initial admission date of 11/18/24. His/her medical history included dementia and presence of a gastrostomy tube. An admission Minimum Data Set (MDS) with an Assessment Reference Date (ARD) of 12/30/24 revealed a Brief Interview for Mental Status (BIMS) score of 02 from a total of 15 possible points indicating the resident's cognition was severely impaired. The assessment identified the presence of a feeding tube. On 1/8/25 at 1:44 p.m. Resident #73 was observed during the lunch meal sitting in his/her wheelchair at a table in the memory care…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-10 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation and interview, it was determined the facility failed to ensure the pureed diets were followed according to the menu. This failed practice affected two (2) residents with pureed diets out of 93 residents who received meals from the kitchen. The findings include: Review of the facility policy, Therapeutic Diets, with a revision date of 12/2020, documented under Purpose,- To ensure that the Facility provides therapeutic diets to residents that meet nutritional guidelines and physicians' orders. The policy listed under Procedure, - IV. The Nutrition Services Manager and Dietitian will observe meal preparation and serving to ensure that: A. Each food item, served separately in the regular diet, is pureed and served separately for a pureed diet per the menu spreadsheet and pureed diets. 1. Review of the noon menu, dated 1/9/25, revealed residents with pureed diets were supposed to receive pureed BBQ meatballs, mashed potato and gravy, pureed buttered peas, pureed brownie, and pureed buttered white bread with a beverage. Observation of the preparation of the noon meal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-13 · tag F0727 — failed to provide required RN coverage — widespreadHave a registered nurse on duty 8 hours a day; and select a registered nurse to be the director of nurses on a full time basis.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a Registered Nurse (RN) for eight consecutive hours per day seven days a week in the first quarter of the fiscal year for October 2022 and November 2022. The facility maintained a census of greater than 60 residents and this deficiency had the potential to affect all residents. The census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's Nursing Department - Staffing, Scheduling & Postings dated 12/2020 showed: -The facility must use the services of a RN for at least eight consecutive hours a day, seven days per week, unless a waiver applies. -The facility will designate a RN to serve as the Director of Nursing (DON) on a full-time basis. -The facility will submit to the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) complete and accurate direct care staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and auditabel data in a uniform format according to specifications established by CMS. 1. Review of the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Payroll Based…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to keep the walk-in refrigerator and walk-in freezer floors clean; to maintain sanitary utensils and food preparation equipment; to properly document hot food temperatures to ensure they were suitably cooked to lessen the chance of bacterial contamination; to maintain plastic cutting boards and utensils in good condition to avoid food safety hazards (cross-contamination); and to separate damaged foodstuffs, in accordance with professional standards for food service safety. These deficient practices had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who ate food from the kitchen. The facility's census was 91 residents with a licensed capacity for 130 residents at the time of the survey. 1. Observations during the initial kitchen inspection on 6/5/23 between 9:04 A.M. and 11:53 A.M. showed the following: -On a can dispenser rack in the Dry Storage room there was a 6 pound (lb.) 8 ounce (oz.) can of irregular sliced peaches that was dented on the top rim. -Numerous maroon and gray plastic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive, facility-specific infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of water-borne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease), and failed to provide documented assessments for such an outbreak with accepted response protocols, in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, volunteers, and staff who reside, visit, use, or work in the facility; and failed to follow acceptable infection control practices to prevent the spread of infection by not putting proper infection control measures for staff and visitors in place for three days for one sampled resident (Resident #28) who returned from the hospital with an infection, out of 19 sampled residents. This had the potential of affecting all residents in the…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · F2023-06-13 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — widespreadEnsure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide 12 hours of training/in-services in the last 12 months, from June 2022 to May 2023, to include abuse/neglect prevention, behaviors, resident rights, and training areas of weakness as determined in the nurse assistants performance reviews for three out of three sampled Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) and abuse/neglect prevention, behaviors, resident rights for two out of two sampled Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN). This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's Care Standards policy dated 6/2020 showed: -Ensure all residents receive necessary care and services that are evidence-based and in accordance with accepted professional clinical standards of practice. -The Administrator or designee maintains copies of current license and/or certification documentation for staff providing direct care to residents. -The Director of Nursing (DON) or designee evaluates staff competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for residents assessed needs. -The…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-13 · tag F0582 — patternGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a Notice of Medicare Provider Non-Coverage (NOMNC) ((Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) form CMS-10123) was provided to the resident or their representative for one sampled resident (Resident #355) and to ensure a Skilled Nursing Facility Advanced Beneficiary Notice (SNF ABN) (form (CMS)-10055) was provided to the resident or their representative for three sampled residents (Resident #355, #74 and #20) out of three sampled residents who were discharged from Medicare part A (insurance that covers inpatient hospital care, skilled nursing facility, lab tests, surgery, home health care for individuals who are [AGE] years of age and above or disabled). The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the undated Form Instructions for the NOMNC CMS-10123 form showed the NOMNC must be delivered at least two calendar days before Medicare coverage services end. Review of the CMS memo (S&C-09-20), dated 1/9/09, showed: -The NOMNC, form…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-13 · tag F0623 — patternProvide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to notify in writing the reason for a transfer for three sampled residents, (Resident #42, #71, and #87) who were sent to the hospital out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Transfer and Discharge dated October 24, 2022 showed the facility may transfer a resident for the following reason: -The transfer was necessary for the resident's welfare. -The resident's needs could not be met in the facility. -Documentation relating to the resident's transfer would be maintained in the resident's medical record. -Prior to transfer the Social Services Staff or designee would have provided the resident or responsible party with reasonable notice that the resident was going to be transferred. -The Notice of Transfer would include the following information: -The reason the resident was transferred. -The effective date of the transfer. -The name, complete address and telephone number to which the resident was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-13 · tag F0625 — patternNotify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were sent to the hospital received a written bedhold policy for three sampled residents, (Resident #42, #71, and #87) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Record review of the facility's policy Transfer and discharge date d October 24, 2022 showed: -Before the Facility transfers a resident to a hospital the Facility would provide written information to the resident or his/her personal representative which specifies: -The duration of the bed-hold during which the resident was permitted to return and resume residence in the nursing facility. -The Facilities policies regarding bed-hold periods permitting a resident to return. -At the time of transfer, the Facility would provide to the resident and a family member or personal representative written notice which specifies the duration of the bed-hold policy, and would inform the resident of his/her right to exercise a bed hold provision. 1. Review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0640 — patternEncode each resident’s assessment data and transmit these data to the State within 7 days of assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to transmit Minimum Data Sets (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) system for three sampled residents (Resident #31, #86 and #43) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. Review of the CMS System showed that an MDS had not been transmitted for Resident #31 for over 120 days. Review of the CMS System showed no entry tracking form for 6/6/19 for Resident #31. During an interview on 6/12/23 at 11:31 A.M., MDS Coordinator B said: -Resident #31's assessment was completed on 5/9/23 also due on 5/9/23. -It was transmitted on 6/5/23 by the corporate office staff. -Corporate staff were responsible for submission and transmitting. 2. Review of the CMS System showed that an MDS had not been transmitted for Resident #86 for over 120 days. Review of the CMS System showed no entry tracking form for 6/6/19 for Resident #86. During an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-06-13 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure oxygen tubing and equipment was stored in a sanitary means, kept clean, and changed out per physician's order for three sampled residents, (Resident #7, #62, and #87) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Oxygen Administration, dated 6/20 showed: -All oxygen tubing, humidifiers masks, and cannulas used to deliver oxygen: -Would be changed out weekly and when visibly soiled, or as indicated by state regulation. -Oxygen items would be stored in a plastic bag at the resident's bedside to protect the equipment from dust and dirt when not in use. 1. Review of Resident #7's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD- a group of lung diseases that block airflow and make it difficult to breathe). -Sleep apnea (a potentially serious sleep disorder in which breathing repeatedly…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0732 — patternPost nurse staffing information every day.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure staffing information was posted daily in a prominent place, readily accessible to residents and visitors of the daily resident census, or the number of nursing staff for each shift. This practice had the potential to affect all residents and visitors who were inquiring about the facility staffing hours. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's Nursing Department-Staffing, Scheduling & Postings policy dated October 24, 2022 showed: -To ensure an adequate number of nursing personnel are available to meet resident needs. -The facility will post the following information on a daily basis: --Facility name. --The current date. --The total number and actual hours worked by the following categories of licensed and unlicensed nursing staff directly responsible for resident care per shift. --Registered Nurses (RN). --Licensed Practical Nurses (LPN) or Licensed Vocational Nurses (LVN) (as defined under state law). --Certified Nurse Aides (CNA). -Posting requirements: --The Facility will post…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to sign out a narcotic medication before administering it to one sampled resident (Resident #100), to have two signatures for each shift, resulting in four signatures each day, when counting narcotic medications at the beginning and end of each shift; to ensure the narcotic count sheet was not presigned by one nurse prior to counting narcotic medications; to ensure the narcotic count was accurate and to report a discrepancy of a narcotic count for one sampled resident (Resident #77) out of 19 sampled residents; and to ensure the signature page for the narcotic count sheet had the accurate number of narcotic medication cards for the 500 hall medication cart. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's policy Storage of Controlled Substances, dated 8/2020 showed: -Medications classified as controlled substances (also known as a narcotic medication- a drug or other substance that is tightly controlled by the government because it may be abused or cause an addiction) are subject to special…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — patternEnsure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Medication Regimen Review (MRR)s were reviewed monthly by a pharmacist, were included in the medical charts, were acted upon and maintained the physician's response to the MRRs for four sampled residents (Residents #47, #40, #28 and #47) out of five residents sampled for unnecessary medications. This practice had the potential to effect each resident's physical and mental well-being. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's Medication Regimen Review policy, dated August 2020, showed: -The consultant pharmacist was responsible for performing a comprehensive review of each resident's medication regimen and clinical record at least monthly. -The MRR included evaluating the resident's response to medication therapy to determine that the resident maintained the highest practicable level of functioning and preventing or minimizing adverse consequences related to medication therapy. -The MRR also involved a thorough review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — patternEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the medication refrigerator was checked daily to ensure the temperature was within range. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Refrigerator/Freezer Temperature Records dated 12/20 showed: -A daily temperature record was to have been kept for the refrigerated and frozen storage areas. -The services manager or designee was to have recorded daily all refrigerator temperatures on the Refrigerator Temperature Log during A.M. and P.M. shifts. -The refrigerator temperature must be 41 degree Fahrenheit (F) or below. -Temperatures above this should be reported to the service manager. -Corrective action should have been taken to correct the temperature, or the items should have been moved to another storage area to maintain acceptable temperature. 1. Observation on 6/9/23 at 7:47 A.M. of the 500 hall medication refrigerator with Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) B showed: -The temperature inside the medication refrigerator was 50 degrees F. -The temperature was verified by LPN B to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-06-13 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — patternDevelop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide Pneumococcal (lung inflammation caused by bacterial or viral infection) vaccines, assessments and education for three sampled residents (Resident #355, #28 and #71) out of five residents sampled for immunizations. This practice had the potential to effect all residents. The census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's Pneumococcal Disease Prevention policy, dated 12/1/2017, showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure the facility prevented and controlled the spread of pneumococcal disease in the facility. -The facility offered training to facility staff upon hire and inform residents on precautions and best practices to prevent and control the pneumococcal disease in the facility. -The pneumococcal vaccine was recommended for: --All adults [AGE] years of age or older. --Anyone through [AGE] years of age who had long-term health problems such as heart disease, lung disease, and diabetes. -Before offering the pneumococcal vaccine each…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify one sampled resident's (Resident #25) responsible party when the physician made medication changes, ordered tests, and when the resident had a change in condition out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's Change of Condition Notification policy dated 6/2020 showed: -Residents, family, legal representatives, and physicians are informed of changes in the resident's condition in a timely manner. -The facility will promptly inform the resident, consult with the resident's Attending physician, and notify the resident's legal representative when the resident endures a significant change in their condition caused by, but not limited to: --A significant change in the resident's physical, cognitive, behavioral or functional status. --A significant change in treatment. -The licensed nurse will notify the resident, the resident's responsible party, or the family/surrogate decision-makers of any changes in…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-06-13 · tag F0638 — isolatedAssure that each resident’s assessment is updated at least once every 3 months.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a quarterly review assessment for one sampled resident (Resident #40) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. Review on 6/9/23 of Resident #40's most recent Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) showed it was a quarterly MDS dated [DATE]. Review during the survey conducted 6/1/23-6/13/23 of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) System showed that an MDS had not been transmitted for the resident for over 120 days. Observation on 6/5/23 at 1:46 P.M. showed: -The resident self-propelling himself/herself out of his/her room in a wheelchair. -The resident asking how to get out said he/she wondered if he/she could go out the window. -The resident went back into his/her room, went to his/her window and tried pulling it up but could not move it. Observation on 6/6/23 showed: -At 10:18 A.M., the resident was lying in bed. -At…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately reflect wandering on the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) for one sampled resident (Resident #43) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. 1. Review of Resident #43's annual MDS dated [DATE] showed the following staff assessment of the resident: -The resident did not wander (the act of moving from place to place with or without a specified course or known direction and it may or may not be aimless). -An occupation was not listed for the resident. Review of the resident's quarterly MDS dated [DATE] showed the following staff assessment of the resident: -The resident did not wander. -An occupation was not listed for the resident. Review of the resident's care plan dated 4/5/23 showed: -The resident was an elopement risk and wandered related to dementia (a progressive mental disorder characterized by memory problems, impaired…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — isolatedEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to complete laboratory (lab) services as ordered for two sampled residents (Residents #40 and #61) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Laboratory, Diagnostic and Radiology Services showed: -Lab services would be coordinated pursuant to an order by a physician. -The facility was responsible for the quality and timeliness of services provided by the lab. -Lab results would be maintained as part of the resident's medical record. 1. Review of Resident #40's current orders showed a physician's order dated 4/11/22 for the following labs every three months: -Complete Blood Count (CBC-a test that gives information about blood cells) with differential (CBC with differential-measures the amount of each type of white blood cell in the body which are part of the immune system that helps prevent infections). -Comprehensive Metabolic Panel (CMP-a panel of labs that give information regarding…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-06-13 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — isolatedEnsure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to complete a dietary preferences/screen/assessment for one sampled resident (Resident #2) who had ethnic preferences for food out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 91 residents. Review of the facility's undated policy titled Resident Preference Interview showed: -The Nutrition Services Manager or designee would meet with the resident within 72 hours of admission or readmission to review the resident's diet, the types of food served at each meal and review the weekly menu and the locations where it was posted. -A Nutrition Screen would be completed upon admission, readmission and no less than annually to capture the resident's preferences. -Resident preferences would be reflected on the tray card and updated in a timely manner. -The Nutrition Services Manager or designee would review the Nutrition Screen with the resident quarterly or more often if requested by the resident to determine if the information is still accurate.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-04-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespreadProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain sanitary food serving utensils and preparation equipment; failed to ensure plastic cutting boards were in good condition to avoid food safety hazards; failed to separate damaged food stuffs and keep others free from contamination; failed to refrigerate food stuffs when needed; and failed to keep all kitchen floor areas clean. These deficient practices potentially affected all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The skilled nursing facility census was 95 residents with a licensed capacity for 130 residents. 1. Observations during the kitchen inspection on 4/5/21 between 9:22 A.M. and 12:18 P.M., showed the following: -In the Dry Storage room the floor felt sticky when walked upon. -There was a 6 pound (lb.) 12 ounce (oz.) can of cut sweet potatoes heavily dented on one side and a 5 lb. 13 oz. dented can of spinach on a can dispensing rack. -There was a sign on the dispensing rack that read, Please Bring All Dented Cans to the Manager's Office. -On a top shelf there was a tub of bran flakes, a tub…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Fcited before2021-04-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespreadProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain a comprehensive, facility-specific infection prevention and control program designed to help prevent the development and transmission of waterborne pathogens (a bacterium, virus, or other microorganism that can cause disease), and failed to provide documented assessments for such an outbreak, in accordance with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) guidelines. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents, visitors, and staff who reside in, visit, use, or work in the facility. The facility census was 95 with a licensed capacity for 130 residents. 1. Record review of the facility's disaster manual entitled Emergency Preparedness Plan, last reviewed and updated on 2/13/19 and obtained from the north nurse station, showed a 13-page document with the heading Legionella Management Policy that did not include the following requirements: -A facility-specific risk assessment that considers the American…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2021-04-14 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — patternEnsure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain physician's orders for an electronic cardiac device for two sampled residents (Resident #61 and #69), and failed to accurately and consistently document the resident's vital signs (temperature, pulse rate, respiration rate, and blood pressure), right and left lung sounds, and respiratory status (e.g. shortness of breath or even respirations) for the resident's COVID (a new disease caused by a novel (new) coronavirus) respiratory assessments and to consistently document symptoms of COVID on the resident's Treatment Administration Record (TAR). The facility also failed to document administration of medications on the Medication Administration Record (MAR) for one sampled resident (Resident #77), out of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Interim Infection and Control Recommendations for Healthcare Personnel During the Coronavirus, 2019…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-14 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — patternProvide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of Resident #7's Face Sheet showed: -He/she was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and was readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. -He/she had the following diagnoses: --Polyneuropathy (a condition involving damage to multiple nerves throughout the body outside of the brain and spinal cord; symptoms can include temporary or permanent numbness, tingling, pricking or burning sensations, increased sensitivity to touch, and pain). --Spinal stenosis (narrowing in the spine which puts pressure on the nerves and spinal cord which can cause pain and numbness). Record review of the resident's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE] showed: -Was cognitively intact. -Received as needed pain medication. -Had occasional moderate pain. Record review of the resident's POS showed an order dated 2/2/21 for Norco tablet 5-325 (a prescription medication that combines hydrocodone 5 mg, an opioid pain reliever, with acetaminophen(Tylenol) 325 mg, which is given to relieve moderate to severe pain), one tablet every six…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2021-04-14 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — patternDispose of garbage and refuse properly.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to properly contain waste in a garbage can in the kitchen, and in close-lidded dumpsters, to prevent the harboring and/or feeding of pests. This deficient practice potentially affected all residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 95 residents with a licensed capacity for 130 residents. 1. Observations during the kitchen inspection on 4/5/21 at 3:45 P.M. outside the Service Hall showed there were two dumpsters side-by-side, both facing northward, with the left lid of the east dumpster left completely open. 2. Observations during a follow-up kitchen inspection and the facility outer perimeter inspection on 4/6/21, showed the following: -At 8:18 A.M., both lids of the east dumpster were completely open. -At 8:40 A.M., a silver trash can with foot pedal next to a sink in the kitchen had its lid propped up approximately 9 inches by the trash piled too high inside. -At 9:43 A.M., the left lid of the east dumpster was completely open. -At 2:23 P.M., the left lid of the east dumpster was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-14 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolatedHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to promote dignity when one cognitively impaired sampled resident (Resident #9) was exposed in an incontinence brief and hospital gown visible to the hallway and not dressed daily in appropriate clothing out of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's Privacy and Dignity policy revised 6/2020 showed: -The facility promoted resident care in a manner and an environment that maintained or enhanced dignity and respect, in full recognition of each residents' individuality. -The staff were to assist the resident in maintaining self-esteem and self-worth. -Residents were dressed appropriate to the time of day and season as well as individual preferences. 1. Record review of Resident #9's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: -Femur fracture (broken thigh bone). -Need for assistance with personal care. -Attention and concentration deficits.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-14 · tag F0679 — failed to provide activities — isolatedProvide activities to meet all resident's needs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop an individualized plan and provide an activity program based on the resident's comprehensive assessments and activity preferences to meet the resident's interests and needs for one cognitively impaired sampled resident (Resident #9) and one cognitively intact sampled resident (Resident #72) out 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's Activities Program policy revised 6/20/20 showed: -The purpose was to encourage residents to participate in activities to make life more meaningful, to stimulate and support mental and physical capabilities to the fullest extent and to enable the resident to maintain the highest social, physical and emotional functioning. -The facility provided an activity program designed to meet the needs, interests, and preferences of the residents. -A variety of activities should be offered on a daily basis which included weekends and evenings. -Activities were…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2021-04-14 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — isolatedProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure tracheostomy care was performed in a manner to reduce the potential for complications for one sample resident (Resident #72), when staff failed to ensure appropriate supplies were available for tracheostomy care, and failed to follow physician's orders and administer oxygen via a tracheostomy shield. As a result, the resident was without his/her correct size inner cannula (the inner trach tube that acts as a liner that can be removed and replaced to prevent the build-up of mucus inside the trach tube) for 59 minutes. The facility also failed to transcribe physician's orders for one closed record sampled resident (Resident #501) for the use of a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP - a non-invasive ventilation with two pressures settings, one for inhalation and one for exhalation, to assist with breathing) out of 22 sampled residents and 16 closed records. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-14 · tag F0712 — isolatedEnsure that the resident and his/her doctor meet face-to-face at all required visits.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received required physician's visits with an alternating personal visit in a rotation of the resident's physician and nurse practitioner for one sampled resident (Resident #61) out of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility's Physician Services and Visits policy revised 8/2020 showed: -The purpose was that the facility would provide residents with care under an attending physician. -The physician must evaluate the resident at least every 60 days unless there was an alternate schedule or state specific requirement. 1. Record review of Resident #61's admission Record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: -Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA, stroke). -Hemiplegia/hemiparesis (paralysis/weakness affecting one side of the body) -Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD-moderate kidney damage). -Diabetes Mellitus (a complex disorder of carbohydrate, fat, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2021-04-14 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure medication regime was free of psychoactive medications without adequate indications, and to ensure behaviors were identified for each psychotropic (a drug that affects brain activities associated with mental processes and behavior) medication used to address the resident's psychosocial needs, for use for one sampled resident (Resident #68), failed to ensure a Pro Re Nata (PRN - as needed) antianxiety (a drug that is used to prevent and treat anxiety (an emotion characterized by feelings of tension and worry) medication was limited to a 14 day duration or to indicate a specific duration if the medication was extended beyond that time period, and to ensure nurses documented specific behaviors and non-pharmacological interventions used prior to using a PRN antianxiety medication for one sampled resident (Resident #78) out of 22 sampled residents. The facility census was 95 residents. Record review of the facility Psychotherapeutic Drug…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$71,208 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $71,208 — penalty dated 2025-01-10
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2025-02-28 for 18 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 2 of 5 | 2.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 5 of 5 | 4.3 | +0.7 vs chain |
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Since |
|---|---|---|---|
| EL DORADO NURSING AND REHABILITATION LLC | Organization | DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/12/2022 |
| CALIBER ADVISORS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/12/2022 |
| CRESTVIEW TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/12/2022 |
| FIRST SWEETZER HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/12/2022 |
| HATTERAS INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/12/2022 |
| RIMPAU HOLDINGS TRUST | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/12/2022 |
| SASEM INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | since 12/12/2022 |
| 1800 S SWOPE DRIVE MO, LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/12/2022 |
| EMERALD PROPERTY PARTNERS LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/12/2022 |
| GIBRALTAR TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/12/2022 |
| MONTGOMERY SKY TRUST | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/12/2022 |
| OZARK HEALTHCARE REALTY LLC | Organization | 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/12/2022 |
| CALLICOTT, MICHAEL | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 07/01/2024 |
| GARETZ, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | since 12/12/2022 |
| TADAKAMALLA, SRINATH | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL; ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/12/2023 |
| HAGINS, ELIZABETH | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| KAPLAN, ESTHER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| KAPLAN, MORDECHAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| KAPLAN, MOSHA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| STERNSHEIN, JENNIFER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| UNGER, JEFFREY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | since 04/30/2025 |
| ESDOV INVESTMENTS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/12/2022 |
| JUBILEE MASTER HOLDINGS LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | since 12/12/2022 |
CMS files one row per role, so the 33 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.
14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 83% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $2.9M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 25% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in MO
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265693. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2025-01-10, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.