Highland Pines Nursing Home
1100 N 4th Street, Longview, TX 75601 · Government - Hospital district · 171 certified beds · (903) 753-7661 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0600), cited Mar 2025
- it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
- a high number of inspection citations overall (48) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $17,629 in federal fines (most recent 2024-08-01)
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (2/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- about 18% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 2 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 3 of 5 |
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 3 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 2 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 14.7% | 15.8% | 15.4% | typical |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.7% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.3% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.3% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 2.0% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 6.3% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 19.3% | 18.0% | 18.9% | typical |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 99.1% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 1.8% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 9.4% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.5% | 9.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 0.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 98.9% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 24.1% | 25.7% | 22.6% | typical |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 12.2% | 12.3% | 12.0% | typical |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 3.67 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 2.37 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
50.6% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 86 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 43.2% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 37 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.41 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 70% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 2% of this home’s weekday level — it runs therapy on weekdays, with essentially none at the weekend. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 50.6%CMS range 40.0–59.6 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 10.3%CMS range 7.9–15.7 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 43.2% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 40.5% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 40.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 98.5% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | 100.0% | 100.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 3.1% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 3.1% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 6.9%CMS range 3.8–13.2 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.18 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 171 beds and averages 96.9 residents a day — about 57% occupied, or roughly 74 beds typically open. It often has substantial empty capacity — worth asking why, since low census can reflect either a new or shrinking home or one families are avoiding. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 3.70 hrs/resident/day is at or above the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.08 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 3.12 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.93 on weekdays — 21% thinner on weekends — a notable drop. RN hours go from 0.40 to 0.30 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 46% is about the same as the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
48 citations, most serious first. The 11 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 7 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #1). The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 who was identified as confused and a wanderer and had increased confusion was monitored more closely. Resident#1 was found on a high traffic street in a wheelchair in the street, with no sidewalk and a few inches for a holder on 7/27/24. The facility staff did not know the resident had eloped, or exactly how he left the facility. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 07/31/24. While the IJ was removed on 08/01/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with potential for more than minimal harm that was not immediate jeopardy due to the facility's need to complete in-service training and evaluate the effectiveness of the corrective systems. This failure could result in serious harm and possible death of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure an accurate MDS assessment was completed for 2 of 22 residents reviewed for MDS accuracy. (Resident #12 and Resident #60) The facility failed to accurately code Resident #12's falls within the last 30 days on the admission MDS assessment.The facility failed to ensure Resident #60's Annual MDS assessment accurately reflected her positive PASRR status for mental illness. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving needed care and services. Findings included: 1.Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #12 was an 83- year-old- female, admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses CHF (congestive heart failure- is a long-term condition that happens when your heart cannot pump blood well enough to give your body a normal supply), anemia (a problem of not having enough healthy red blood cells or hemoglobin to carry oxygen to the body's tissues), and gastritis (a general term for a group of conditions with one thing,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I residents with mental illness were provided with a PASRR Evaluation assessment prior to admission for 1 of 5 residents (Residents #60) reviewed for PASRR care and services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #60 had a PASRR evaluation (Level II) completed prior to re-admission from an in-patient psychiatric facility. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 01/14/2026, reflected Resident #60 was a [AGE] year-old female who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, severe with psychotic features (mental health condition that causes extreme mood swings). Record review of the PASRR Level 1 Screening, dated 11/22/2024, reflected Resident #60 was at a psychiatric hospital and had evidence of mental illness. Record…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0655 — isolatedCreate and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was completed and provided to the resident and/or their representative for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for new admissions (Resident #103 and #105). The facility failed to ensure the baseline care plan that included the instructions for resident care needed to provide effective and person-centered care was provided to the resident and/or their representative for Resident #103 and Resident #105. This failure could place residents at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs.Findings included: 1.Record review of an undated face sheet revealed Resident #103 was an [AGE] year-old- male, admitted on [DATE] with the diagnoses of Stage III sacral pressure ulcer (a deep, crater-like wound on the tailbone (sacrum) showing full-thickness skin loss, where subcutaneous fat is visible, but muscle, tendon, or bone are not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident to ensure the comprehensive care plan described the services and interventions to be used to attain and maintain the residents' practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 2 (Resident#17 and Resident #31) of 18 residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to implement a person-centered care plan for a laceration, received in the facility prior to the initiation of the comprehensive care plan on 01/05/2026, requiring sutures with interventions for Resident #17, to meet medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs.The facility did not ensure that Resident #31's care plan had specific triggers for a trauma related problem. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met, a decreased quality of life, and cause residents not to receive needed services.Findings included: Record review of an undated face sheet revealed…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility were labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles, included the appropriate accessory and cautionary instructions, and the expiration date when applicable for 1 of 2 medication storage rooms. (Storage room [ROOM NUMBER])The facility failed to ensure Resident #95's expired Gabapentin was removed from Storage room [ROOM NUMBER].These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the therapeutic benefit of medications or adverse reactions to medications and inaccurate drug administration.Findings included:Record review of a face sheet, dated 1/14/2026, indicated Resident #95 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted [DATE] with diagnosis of Alzheimer's (a progressive neurodegenerative disorder that primarily affects memory, thinking and behavior), chronic pulmonary edema (occurs when fluid accumulate in the lung's air sacs over an extended period of time),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments for 1 of 4 medication carts (Medication Cart #1) reviewed for pharmacy services.The facility failed to ensure Medication Aide Cart #1 for the 200 short hall was locked when unattended.This failure could place residents at risk of having unauthorized access to medications or lead to harm or drug diversions.Findings included:1. During an observation on 1/13/2026 beginning at 7:25 a.m. revealed medication cart #1 for 200 short hall was unlocked and unattended with no staff within eyesight of the medication cart. The medication cart was found near a resident's room, an elevator, and main sitting area where staff and visitors congregate. There was one resident navigating the hallway in a wheelchair near the unlocked medication cart. CMA J immediately locked medication cart when she returned. At time of observation, the length of time remained unattended and unlocked could not be determined.During an interview on 1/13/2026 at 7:25 a.m., CMA J said she was going…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-01-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. 1. A sack of flour was not stored six inches off the floor. 2. Raisin bread, sliced cheese, and tortillas were not labeled or dated. These failures could place residents at risk for food borne illness.Findings included: During an observation and interview on 1/12/26 at 8:05 a.m. it was observed during the initial tour of the kitchen that a large sack of flour was lying on the floor of the dry food storage. The Dietary Manager said she needed help lifting the bag as it was too heavy for her. She said it was recently delivered. It was observed that raisin bread stored in the dry food storage, sliced cheese on a preparation table, and tortillas stored in the dry food storage were not labeled and dated. The cheese was stored in a gallon size bag on top of a preparation table that was used recently been recently used. During an interview on 1/14/26 at 1:06…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-14 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #106) reviewed for infection control practices. The facility failed to ensure LVN A and CNA B utilized enhanced barrier precautions while pulling Resident #106 up in bed on 01/12/2026. This failure could place residents and staff at risk for cross contamination and the spread of infection. The findings included: Record review of the face sheet, dated 01/15/2026, reflected Resident #106 was a [AGE] year-old male who re-admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of sepsis due to E. coli (blood infection caused from bacteria), chronic kidney disease (kidneys are damaged and unable to filter blood as well as it should), and obstructive and reflux uropathy (blockage in the urinary…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-03-04 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — isolatedProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 1 of 8 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for resident abuse. The facility did not ensure Resident # 1 was free from abuse on 2/20/25 when he was slapped on the top of his hand. The noncompliance was identified as PNC. The noncompliance began on 2/20/25 and ended on 2/20/25. The facility had corrected the noncompliance before the investigation began. This failure could place residents at risk of physical harm, mental anguish, or emotional distress. The findings included: Record Review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 11/20/24 indicated Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of Dysphagia (Difficulty swallowing foods or liquids, arising from the throat or esophagus, ranging from mild difficulty to complete and painful blockage), Cognitive Communication Deficit (Cognitive communication is the mental skills used to process information and communicate…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0600 — failed to protect residents from abuse and neglect — patternProtect each resident from all types of abuse such as physical, mental, sexual abuse, physical punishment, and neglect by anybody.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from abuse for 3 of 6 residents (Resident #21, Resident #50, and Resident #74) reviewed for abuse. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21 did not feel abused during bathing by CNA P in September and October 2024. The facility failed to ensure Resident #50 did not experience abuse by Resident #70 on 10/06/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 74 (victim) was free from undesired touching by Resident #77 (alleged perpetrator) on 10/5/2024. These failures could place resident at risk for emotional distress and further abuse. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet dated 10/14/24 indicated Resident #21 was a 69-years-old female admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including need for assistance with personal care, chronic kidney disease (is a long-term condition that occurs when the kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood properly), weakness, pain in right and left shoulder, diabetes mellitus (a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · E2024-10-17 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — patternProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received care, consistent with professional standards of practice, to prevent pressure ulcers based on the comprehensive assessment for 3 of 6 Residents (Resident #21, Resident #51, and Resident #79) whose records were reviewed for skin integrity. The facility failed to ensure Resident #21, Resident #51, and Resident #79's pressure-relieving mattresses (is designed to distribute the patient's body weight over a broad surface area and help prevent skin breakdown) were on the correct settings. The facility failed to ensure Resident #79 received and/or documented wound care on 10/05/24, 10/06/24, 10/07/24, 10/10/24, 10/11/24, and 10/13/24. These failures could place residents at risk for developing pressure ulcers and could contribute to developing avoidable pressure ulcers. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #21's face sheet dated 10/14/24 indicated Resident #21 was a 69-years-old female admitted on [DATE]…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure that each resident who was incontinent of bowel/bladder and each resident with an indwelling catheter received appropriate treatment and services to prevent urinary tract infections, for 3 of 7 residents (Resident #52, Resident #79, and Resident #88) reviewed for indwelling urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #52, Resident #79, and Resident #88's indwelling catheter (drains urine from your bladder into a bag outside your body) had a catheter securement device to anchor catheter to their legs on 10/14/24, 10/15/24, and 10/16/24. The facility failed to ensure Treatment Nurse M did not place Resident #79's catheter bag on the bed during wound care on 10/15/24. Theses failures could place residents at risk for urinary tract infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #52's face sheet dated 10/17/24 indicated Resident #52 was a 77-years-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnosis including…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who needed respiratory care was provided such care, consistent with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, the residents' goals, and preferences for 3 of 5 residents (Resident #25, Resident #16, and Resident #15) reviewed for respiratory care and services. 1. The facility failed to obtain a physician's order for Resident #25's oxygen, prior to surveyor intervention. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #25's oxygen concentrator was clean and free of gray/black debris. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #15's CPAP mask was stored in bag and oxygen concentrator had a filter on 10/14/24-10/17/24. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #16's oxygen concentrator filter was free from gray, fuzzy particles on 10/14/24-10/16/24. These failures could place residents who receive oxygen at risk for developing respiratory complications. Findings included: 1. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0813 — patternHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain and ensure safe and sanitary storage of residents' food items for 5 of 24 resident personal refrigerators reviewed for food safety (Resident #42, Resident #49, Resident #51, Resident #72, and Resident #81). 1.The facility failed to ensure the refrigerator for Resident #72 was cleaned, clutter free and free from meat with green mold. 2.The facility failed to ensure Resident #42, Resident #49, Resident #51, and Resident #81's refrigerator temperature was checked and logged daily. These failures could place resident at risk for food borne illnesses. The Findings were: 1.Record review of Resident #72's face sheet, dated 10/14/24 revealed a [AGE] year old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious, long-term condition that makes it difficult to breathe and exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (a condition that occurs when…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-10-17 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to establish and maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment, and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 6 of 24 residents reviewed for infection control practices (Resident #'s 2, 7, 37, 39, 91, and 100), 1.The facility failed to ensure CNA C changed her gloves and performed hand hygiene appropriately while providing incontinent care to Resident #2. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #7 had enhanced barrier precautions sign posted on door with storage container for PPE on 10/14/2024 for resident with a feeding tube. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 37 had enhanced barrier precautions in place with proper PPE storage containers available to care for foley catheter and wound care. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident # 39 has enhanced barrier precautions in place with PPE containers available…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0582 — isolatedGive residents notice of Medicaid/Medicare coverage and potential liability for services not covered.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to ensure each resident was informed before or at the time of admission, and periodically during the residents stay, of services available in the facility and of charges for those services, which included charges for services not covered under Medicare/Medicaid or by the facility's per diem rate for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #274, and Resident #275) reviewed for Medicare/Medicaid coverage. The facility failed to ensure Resident #274, and Resident #275 were given a SNF ABN (a document that informs a Medicare beneficiary that Medicare will no longer pay for skilled services) when discharged from skilled services at the facility prior to covered days being exhausted. These failures could place residents at risk for not being aware of changes to provided services. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #274's face sheet, dated 10/15/24, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included embolism and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to report the results of all investigations to the Administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident, and if the alleged violation was verified appropriate corrective action must be taken for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for abuse and neglect. The facility failed to ensure the provider investigation report regarding Resident#1's incident with Resident #26, dated 09/12/24 was turned into the state survey agency (HHSC) within 5 working days of the reported incident for Resident #1. This failure could place residents at risk for abuse and neglect. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, dated 10/14/24, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included unspecified dementia (a group of symptoms that affect a person's memory, thinking, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure assessments accurately reflected the resident's status for 2 of 24 resident reviewed for assessments. (Resident #49 and Resident #88) The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's MDS dated [DATE], was not inaccurately coded for being on an antipsychotic medication (are a class of psychotropic medication primarily used to manage psychosis). The facility failed to ensure Resident #49's MDS dated [DATE], was not inaccurately coded as having a diagnosis of bipolar (is a mental illness that causes extreme shifts in mood, energy, and activity levels) instead of mood disorder. The facility failed to ensure Resident #88's MDS dated [DATE] was coded for being PASRR (is a federally mandated review process, requiring all people seeking Medicaid-certified nursing facilities admissions to be screened for mental illness or intellectual and developmental disability regardless of funding source or age) positive for development disability/intellectual…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0645 — isolatedPASARR screening for Mental disorders or Intellectual Disabilities
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure the Pre-admission Screening and Resident Review (PASRR) Level I assessment accurately reflected the resident's status for 1 of 13 residents (Resident #97) reviewed for PASRR Level I screenings. 1. The facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the PASRR Level 1 screening for Resident #97. This failure could place residents who had a mental illness at risk of not receiving a needed assessment (PASRR Evaluation), individualized care, or specialized services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #97's face sheet, dated 10/14/2024, revealed he was a [AGE] year-old male, who was readmitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included hemiplegia and hemiparesis following cerebral infarction (symptom that involves one-sided paralysis after blood flow to the brain is blocked or reduced), obstructive and reflux uropathy (when your urine can't flow (either partially or completely) through your ureter, bladder, or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0646 — isolatedNotify the appropriate authorities when residents with MD or ID services has a significant change in condition.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review the facility failed to notify the State Mental Health Authority to inform them of a significant change in mental condition for 1 of 5 (Residents #93) residents reviewed for Preadmissions Screening and Annual Resident Review (PASRR). 1. The facility failed to notify the SMHA to ensure Resident #93 received a new PASRR level 1 screening following identification of his diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder on 01/25/24. This failure could affect residents who may have a mental disorder diagnosis by placing them at risk for not receiving the necessary services that may benefit them daily. Findings included: Record review of Resident #93's face sheet, dated 10/14/24, indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included post-traumatic stress disorder (a real disorder that develops when a person has experienced or witnessed a scary, shocking, terrifying, or dangerous event), encephalopathy (a broad term for any brain disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 24 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #25) The facility failed to ensure that Resident #25's care plan addressed his oxygen use. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the necessary care or having important care needs identified. Findings included: Record review of Resident #25's face sheet, dated 10/15/24, indicated he was a [AGE] year-old male, admitted to the facility on [DATE]. His diagnoses included chronic respiratory failure (a long-term condition that makes it difficult to breathe because the lungs can't exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide properly), heart failure (a serious condition that occurs when the heart can't pump enough blood and oxygen to meet the body's needs), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (a common lung disease…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to provide the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for 2 of 5 residents reviewed for ADLs. (Resident #81 and Resident #88) The facility failed ensure Resident #81 was provided timely incontinent care on 10/15/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #88 did not have yellow substance on his gum line and between his teeth on 10/14/24, 10/15/24, and 10/16/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #88 was gotten or offered to get out of bed in October 2024. Theses failures could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #81's face sheet dated 10/17/24 indicated Resident #81 was a 75-years-old female admitted on [DATE] and 08/07/22 with diagnoses including chronic respiratory failure (occurs when the body has low…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services to include procedures that assured the accurate dispensing and administering of all drugs to meet the needs of 1 of 12 residents reviewed for pharmaceutical services. (Resident #72) Facility staff failed to remove Lidocaine patches 5% strength from Resident #72's personal refrigerator. These deficient practices could affect residents and place them at risk of not receiving the therapeutic dosage and drug diversion. The findings were: Record review of Resident #72's face sheet, dated 10/14/24 revealed a [AGE] year old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses that included chronic respiratory failure with hypoxia (a serious, long-term condition that makes it difficult to breathe and exchange oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body), unspecified protein-calorie malnutrition (a condition that occurs when a person does not get enough calories or the right amount of nutrients, such as proteins, carbohydrates, fats,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0757 — failed to avoid unnecessary drugs — isolatedEnsure each resident’s drug regimen must be free from unnecessary drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure each resident's drug regimen was free from unnecessary medications (is a medication used: In excessive doses (including duplicate therapy); or For excessive duration; or Without adequate monitoring; or Without adequate indication for its use; or In the presence of adverse consequences which indicate the dose should be reduced or discontinued) for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #21) reviewed for unnecessary medications in that: The facility failed to ensure Resident #21 had documented diagnoses for the use of Atorvastatin (is used together with a proper diet to lower cholesterol and triglyceride (fats) levels in the blood), Furosemide (is a strong diuretic ('water pill')), Lasix (is a loop diuretic (water pill) that prevents your body from absorbing too much salt, causing it to be passed in your urine), Gabapentin (is a medicine used to treat partial seizures, nerve pain from shingles and restless leg syndrome), Melatonin (is used to combat jet lag…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolatedImplement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's PRN orders for psychotropic drugs were limited to fourteen (14) days for 1 of 24 residents selected for unnecessary medications review. (Resident #59). Resident #59 had a PRN order for Lorazepam, a psychotropic medication, for more than fourteen days without physician documentation re-evaluating the medication to continue it PRN or to become a scheduled medication. This failure could place residents who receive PRN psychotropic medications at risk of receiving unnecessary medications. Findings included: Record review of the undated face sheet indicated Resident #59 was an [AGE] year-old male that admitted on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Record review of the quarterly MDS dated [DATE] indicated Resident #59 had clear speech, was understood by others, and understood others. He had a BIMS score of 9 indicating moderate cognitive impairment. Record review of the care plan dated 8/29/24 indicated Resident #59 required psychotropic…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolatedEnsure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that it was free of medication error rate of 5 percent or greater. The facility had a medication error rate of 14.81%, based on 4 errors out of 27 opportunities, which involved 2 of 5 residents (Resident #39, Resident #90) reviewed for medication administration. 1. The facility failed to administer Resident # 39's [NAME] vitamin B-complex (contains essential vitamins such as B-complex, vitamin C, and folic acid, which help manage or prevent deficiencies common in individuals with compromised renal function.) and administered incorrect dose of Vitamin D3 25 mcg (a nutrient your body needs for building and maintaining healthy bones) on 10/15/2024. 2. The facility failed to administer Resident # 90's Oxybutynin (to treat an overactive bladder) and Protonix (a medication used to decrease the amount of acid produced in the stomach as ordered on 10/15/2024. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving the intended…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-10-17 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolatedEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that residents were free of significant medication errors for 1 of 10 residents (Residents #51) reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure Resident #51 received Acetaminophen-Codeine Oral Tablet 300-60mg (is used to help relieve mild to moderate pain; Tylenol #4 contains 60 mg of Codeine) as scheduled on 10/13/24 (8am and 3pm) and 10/14/24 (8am). This failure could place residents at risk of discomfort and pain. Findings included: Record review of Resident #51's face sheet dated 10/15/24 indicated Resident #51 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted on [DATE] and 12/08/20 with diagnoses including metabolic encephalopathy (is a brain dysfunction caused by a chemical imbalance in the blood that affects the brain), muscle wasting and atrophy (shortening), pain in left leg and hip, anxiety (is a mental illness that causes excessive and uncontrollable feelings of fear or anxiety that can significantly impair a person's daily life),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-10-17 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure drugs and biologicals were stored in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 2 of 38 residents. (Resident #274 and Resident # 54) 1. The facility failed to ensure Santyl and Mupirocin ointment 2% was properly stored and locked in accordance with currently accepted professional standards for Resident # 54. 2. The facility failed to ensure Triamcinolone Acetonide Ointment 1% was properly stored and locked in accordance with currently accepted professional standards on [DATE] for Resident # 274. This failure could place residents at risk for adverse effects and reduced therapeutic effects of medication and supplies. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #54 s face sheet, dated [DATE], revealed he was an [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with the diagnoses which included Type II Diabetes (Diabetes mellitus refers to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #1) The facility failed to develop and implement the comprehensive person-centered care plan for Resident #1 by not documenting foley catheter changes. This failure could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met, a decreased quality of life, and cause residents not to receive needed services. Findings include: Record review of a face sheet dated 11/7/22 revealed Resident #1 was [AGE] years old and was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including Obstructive and Reflux Uropathy (A blockage in the urinary tract that prevents urine from flowing normally. This can cause urine to back up into the kidneys, which can damage them.), COPD (Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is a chronic lung disease that makes it difficult to breathe),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-09-04 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident received adequate supervision to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents reviewed for accidents (Resident #14). The facility failed to ensure Resident #14 who was identified as high fall risk, confused, unable to be assessed for ability to sit to stand due to medical condition and safety concerns, and required wheelchair was monitored more closely to prevent falls or injury. This failure could place residents at risk for injury or harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #14's face sheet dated 9/3/2024 indicated she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Some of her diagnoses were traumatic subdural hemorrhage with loss of consciousness of 30 minutes or less, subsequent encounter (a type of bleeding near the brain that can happen after a head injury), dementia (general term for impaired ability to remember, think, or make decisions that interferes with doing everyday activities), depression (mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-08-01 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, exploitation or mistreatment, including injuries of unknown source and misappropriation of resident property, are reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation is made, if the events that cause the allegation involve abuse or result in serious bodily injury, or not later than 24 hours if the events that cause the allegation do not involve abuse and do not result in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency) for 1 of 7 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for neglect. Resident #1 was identified as confused and a wanderer and had increased confusion but was not monitored more closely. The facility did not report to HHSC when Resident #1 was discovered in traffic on a busy street on 7/27/24. This failure placed the resident at risk for harm. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to consult with the resident physician when there was a need to alter treatment for 1 out of 3 residents (Resident #61) reviewed for notification of changes. The facility failed to notify and consult with the physician about the changes in Resident #61's high blood sugar readings. This failure could place residents at the risk of not receiving appropriate medical interventions, which could result in severe illness or hospitalization. Findings included: Record review of Resident #61's face sheet, dated 09/05/23 indicated Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke (lack of adequate blood supply to brain cells deprives them of oxygen and vital nutrients which can cause parts of the brain to die off), diabetes (a condition that happens when your blood sugar (glucose) is too high) and seizures (when too many of your brain cells become excited at the same…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2023-08-31 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — patternHonor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide a safe, clean, sanitary, comfortable, and homelike environment 4 of 35 residents reviewed for environment. (Resident #34, Resident #73, Resident #23, and Resident #267) 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34 and Resident #73's portable air conditioning unit/filter was free of gray fuzz and dust-like particles. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #34's fan was free of gray fuzz and dust-like particles. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23's bathroom was cleaned daily. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #267 did not have enteral feeding (also known as tube feeding, is a way of delivering nutrition directly to your stomach or small intestine) on the floor, IV pole, wall, and mattress. These failures could place residents at risk of an unsafe, unsanitary, or uncomfortable environment and a decrease in quality of life and self-worth. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #34's face sheet dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to meet each resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs for 2 of 7 residents reviewed for care plans. (Resident #72, Resident #98) The facility failed to implement the care plan intervention to document Resident #72 and Resident #98's meal intake. The facility failed to implement the care plan intervention for Resident #98 to receive his Frozen Nutritional Treats with meals. These failures could place residents at risk of not having individual needs met and cause residents not to receive needed services Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/30/23 indicated Resident #72 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Parkinson's (is a movement disorder. It causes tremors, stiffness, and slow movement), Alzheimer's (a progressive disease that destroys memory and other important mental functions),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain personal hygiene were provided for 4 of 6 residents reviewed for ADLs (Resident # 79, Resident #98, Resident #66, Resident #90). 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #79 received her scheduled bed bath. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #98 received his schedule bed baths. 3. The facility failed to ensure Resident #98 was offered to get out of bed. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #66 was routinely showered/bathed and shaved. 5. The facility failed to ensure Resident #90 was routinely showered/bathed. These failures could place residents who required assistance from staff for ADLs at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs which could result in poor care, risk for skin breakdown, feelings of poor self-esteem, lack of dignity and health. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — patternProvide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was incontinent of the bladder and had an indwelling urinary catheter received appropriate treatment and services for 3 of 4 resident (Resident #5, #79, and #89) reviewed for incontinence and urinary catheters. The facility failed to ensure Resident #5 had a physician's order for her indwelling urinary catheter with appropriate diagnosis for use. The facility failed to provide timely incontinence care to Resident #79 and Resident #89. These failures could place residents at risk for not receiving appropriate care, infections, skin breakdown and decreased quality of life. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #5's face sheet dated 08/30/23, indicated an [AGE] year-old female who initially admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE] with diagnoses which included dementia (memory loss), neuromuscular dysfunction of bladder (bladder dysfunction caused by nervous system conditions), diabetes…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — patternProvide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that respiratory care was provided consistent with professional standards of practice for 7 of 35 residents reviewed for respiratory care. (Resident #4, Resident #26, Resident #34, Resident #56, Resident #67, Resident #73, and Resident #75). 1. The facility failed to ensure oxygen concentrator filters were free of gray fuzz, hair-like and dust-like particles for Resident #4, Resident #26, Resident #34, and Resident #73. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #75's oxygen concentrator was free of gray fuzz and dust-like particles in the slatted vent on the back of the oxygen concentrator. 3. The facility did not ensure oxygen concentrator filters were free from brown like substances for Resident #56 and Resident #67. 4. The facility failed to ensure Resident #26's oxygen tubing was changed weekly per physician orders. These failures could place residents at risk of respiratory infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — patternProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 4 of 6 residents (Resident #s 9, 68, 23, 79) reviewed for pharmacy services. ADON K failed to ensure she had a witness when wasting Resident #9's acetaminophen-codeine 300-60mg tablet (controlled medication used for pain). The facility failed to ensure Resident #68's Lorazepam (controlled antianxiety medication) was accurately reconciled. The facility failed to administer Resident #23 and Resident #79's scheduled medication per the facility's policy timeframe. These failures could place the residents at risk of not having medications available for use, not receiving medications, and drug diversion. Findings include: 1. Record review of Resident #9's face sheet dated 08/30/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-31 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — patternProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for 6 of 6 residents (Resident #s 5, 81, 32, 23, 79, and 98) and 4 of 4 staff (ADON K, LVN V, CNA A, CNA B) reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure ADON K cleaned the glucometer after using it on a Resident #81. The facility failed to ensure ADON K performed hand hygiene during Resident #81's medication administration. The facility failed to ensure LVN V performed hand hygiene during Resident #5's medication administration. The facility failed to ensure CNA A provided proper incontinent care to Resident #32. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23 and Resident #79's water pitchers were cleaned regularly. The facility failed to ensure CNA A and CNA B followed contact isolation guideline for Resident #98.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs and preferences for 2 of 3 residents (Resident #98, Resident #267) reviewed for reasonable accommodations. The facility failed to ensure Resident #98 and Resident#267 call lights were within reach. The facility failed to ensure Resident #98, and Resident #267 had been assessed for the appropriate type of call light. These failures could place residents at risk for unmet needs. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/28/23 indicated Resident #98 was a [AGE] year-old male and admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses including Asperger's syndrome (a developmental disorder affecting ability to effectively socialize and communicate), muscle wasting and atrophy (is the wasting (thinning) or loss of muscle tissue), muscle weakness, slowness and poor responsiveness, limitation of activities…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to personal privacy and confidentiality of medical records for 2 (Resident #81 and Resident #5) of 7 residents reviewed for privacy and confidentiality. ADON K failed to ensure she closed the EMR of Resident #81 before entering his room to obtain a blood sugar check and administer medications. LVN V failed to ensure she closed Resident #5's EMR before entering the supply room and leaving the cart unattended. These failures could place residents at risk for low self-esteem, loss of dignity and decreased quality of life due to medication administration record being accessible to others. Findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #81's face sheet dated 08/30/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included quadriplegia (paralysis that affects all four limbs, plus torso), diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood),…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the comprehensive care plan was reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team and the participation of the resident for 1 of 2 residents (Resident #82) reviewed for care plan timing and revision. The facility failed to ensure the IDT were in attendance to Resident #82's care plan meeting. This failure could place residents at risk of not being able to attain or maintain their highest practicable level of physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #82's face sheet dated 08/30/23, indicated a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses which included cerebrovascular disease (stroke), diabetes mellitus (a group of diseases that result in too much sugar in the blood), hypertension (high blood pressure), schizophrenia (disorder that affects a person's ability to think, feel, and behave clearly), and bipolar disorder (disorder associated with episodes of mood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0692 — failed to prevent malnutrition and dehydration — isolatedProvide enough food/fluids to maintain a resident's health.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were offered sufficient fluid intake to maintain proper hydration and health for 3 of 4 resident (Resident #23, Resident #79, Resident #98) reviewed for hydration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #23, and Resident #79 received adequate hydration. The facility failed to ensure Resident #98 received thickened liquid for hydration between meals. The facility failed to implement the care plan intervention for Resident #98 to receive his Frozen Nutritional Treats with meals. These failures could place residents at risk for dehydration, electrolyte imbalance, and infections. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/30/23 indicated Resident #23 was [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including type 2 diabetes (a chronic condition that affects the way the body processes blood sugar (glucose)), need for assistance with personal care, and abnormal weight loss. Record review of a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments under proper temperature controls and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for 1 of 6 medication carts and 3 of 27 residents reviewed in sample (Resident #319, Resident #13 and Resident #81 ). The facility failed to have Resident #319's Arthritis hot pain cream stored and locked in an area not accessible to other staff, residents, or visitors. The facility failed to ensure Resident #13 did not have prescribed and OTC medications at bedside. ADON K failed to ensure the medication cart for hall 300 rooms 316-331 was locked when it was left unattended while giving Resident #81's medication. ADON K and LVN V failed to ensure the medication cart for hall 300 rooms 316-331 was locked when it was left unattended. These failures could place residents at risk of injury. Findings included: 1.Record review of Resident #319's face sheet dated 08/30/23 indicated she was a…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-31 · tag F0813 — isolatedHave a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review the facility failed to ensure safe and sanitary storage of resident's food items for 2 of 3 residents reviewed for personal food safety. (Resident #16 and Resident #34) The facility did not implement the personal food policy related to personal refrigerators for Resident's #16 and Resident #34. These failures could place the residents at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: 1. Record review of Resident #16's face sheet dated 8/30/23 indicated she was a 100year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnoses of high blood pressure, breast cancer, heart failure, and need for assistance with personal care. Record review of Resident #16's MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated that she had a BIMS score of 12 which meant she had moderately impaired cognition. The MDS also indicated that resident required extensive assistance of 2 staff for bed mobility, extensive assistance of 1 staff for transfers, toileting, dressing, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — isolatedKeep all essential equipment working safely.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record review, the facility failed to ensure all patient care equipment was in safe operating condition for 1 of 1 resident (Resident#14) reviewed safe, functional equipment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #14 had an armrest cushion and secured side panel of her wheelchair. This failure could place residents at risk for skin issues, discomfort, and falls. Findings included: 1. Record review of a face sheet dated 08/30/23 indicated Resident #14 was a [AGE] year-old female and admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including repeated falls, age-related physical debility (weakness or feebleness), lack of coordination and unsteadiness on feet. Record review of a quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] indicated Resident #14 was understood and understood others. The MDS indicated Resident #14 had adequate hearing, clear speech, and impaired vision with corrective lenses. The MDS indicated Resident #14 had a BIMS score of 15 which indicated intact cognition. The MDS indicated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-08-31 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolatedHave policies on smoking.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow their own established smoking policy for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #61) reviewed for smoking. The facility failed to ensure Resident #61 followed the facility's policy on smoking. the did not have a lighter and cigarettes on his bedside table. This failure could place residents at risk of unsafe smoking and injury. Findings included: Record review of Resident #61's face sheet, dated 09/05/23 indicated Resident #61 was an [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility on [DATE] and re-admitted [DATE] with diagnoses which included stroke (lack of adequate blood supply to brain cells deprives them of oxygen and vital nutrients which can cause parts of the brain to die off), diabetes (a condition that happens when your blood sugar (glucose) is too high) and seizures (when too many of your brain cells become excited at the same time). Record review of Resident #61's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 08/04/23, indicated Resident #61 was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$17,629 in federal fines across 1 penalty. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $17,629 — penalty dated 2024-08-01
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-08-30 for 11 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 2 of 5 | 2.2 | -0.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 3 of 5 | 4.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FRIO HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 01/01/2024 |
| RUFF, MICHAEL | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HP NURSING & REHAB LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| GARETZ, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| GURWITZ, SOLOMON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/03/2025 |
| HAGINS, ELIZABETH | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/28/2025 |
| KAPLAN, ESTHER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/03/2025 |
| KAPLAN, MORDECHAI | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/28/2025 |
| MINDLE, ADAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/03/2025 |
| UNGER, JEFFREY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 07/03/2025 |
| 1100 FOURTH STREET M TIC, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| GIBRALTAR TRUST | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| HP LONGVIEW REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| LARCHMONT REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| OPCO TEXAS SKILLED MGMT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| OREGON REALTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/01/2024 |
| EARNEST, CARL | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/01/2019 |
| WRIGHT, JENNIFER | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 01/14/2025 |
10 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 73% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $1.7M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 18% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2023. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2023). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 675133. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-01-14, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.