Forest Park Nursing & Rehabilitation
6825 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75235 · For profit - Corporation · 150 certified beds · (214) 845-6200 Medicare & Medicaid certified
This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.
- it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Feb 2025
- it has citations for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0609, F0610) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
- inspectors cited 7 immediate-jeopardy problems — the most serious level
- inspectors recorded 1 serious finding as past non-compliance — the problem was found, fixed, and verified before the survey closed, so it is history rather than a current condition, but it is still worth asking what changed
- a high number of inspection citations overall (55) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
- the CMS record shows $193,834 in federal fines (most recent 2025-10-30)
- its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
- its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
- its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
- nursing-staff turnover (68%) runs well above the national median (45%)
One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.
A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.
| Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified | 1 of 5 |
| StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) | 1 of 5 |
| Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility | 4 of 5 |
Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 3 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.
Location & what’s nearby
Open in Google Maps ↗ · Directions ↗ · Larger map ↗
Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.
Quality measures — how residents actually fare
| Overall quality measures | 4 of 5 |
| Long-stay residentspeople who live here | 4 of 5 |
| Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital | 4 of 5 |
Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.
Trend — is this home getting better or worse?
Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating improved from 1 to 2 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.
Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
| Measure | This home | State avg | Typical state | vs typical state |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased | 11.0% | 15.8% | 15.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents who lose too much weight | 0.5% | 3.0% | 5.4% | better |
| Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder | 0.0% | 0.3% | 0.9% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection | 0.7% | 0.8% | 2.0% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms | 0.5% | 2.4% | 6.5% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents who were physically restrained | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.1% | better than state‡ — see note marked double-dagger below the table |
| Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury | 1.6% | 3.3% | 3.3% | better |
| Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened | 10.6% | 14.0% | 16.1% | better |
| Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication | 12.9% | 18.0% | 18.9% | better |
| Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 95.2% | 98.0% | 95.3% | typical |
| Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers | 2.5% | 3.8% | 4.7% | better |
| Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control | 15.2% | 13.4% | 21.2% | better |
| Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication§ — see the note below the table | 15.8% | 9.6% | 17.1% | typical |
| Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication | 2.4% | 1.5% | 1.4% | worse |
| Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine | 90.9% | 88.0% | 79.4% | better |
| Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission | 12.8% | 25.7% | 22.6% | better |
| Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit | 16.6% | 12.3% | 12.0% | worse |
| Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days | 1.99 | 2.17 | 1.67 | worse |
| Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days | 4.04 | 2.06 | 1.80 | worse |
‡ On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.
§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.
CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.
Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital
Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.
58.5% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 43 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.
Met the expected recovery: 62.5% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 24 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.
Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.24 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 33% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.
Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 18% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.
This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.
See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
| Measure | This home | U.S. median | Period covered | CMS’s call |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF | 58.5%CMS range 44.6–72.5 | 51.5% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF | 9.7%CMS range 6.1–15.8 | 10.7% | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge | 62.5% | 56.6% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge | 54.2% | 52.8% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge | 62.5% | 50.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified | 92.9% | 98.7% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final discharge | not reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure. | — | ||
| Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay | 0.0% | 0.0% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened | 9.5% | 1.9% | Oct 2024–Sep 2025 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
| Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization | 7.1%CMS range 4.2–11.6 | 7.1% | Oct 2023–Sep 2024 | no different from U.S. |
| Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs | 1.03 | 1.02 | Oct 2022–Sep 2024 | CMS makes no comparison for this measure |
From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.
Staffing
How full it usually is: this home is certified for 150 beds and averages 118.8 residents a day — about 79% occupied, or roughly 31 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.
Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.92 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.37 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 1.57 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.
Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.67 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 3.02 on weekdays — 11% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.37 to 0.37 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)
This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 68% is well above the national median of 45%. 2 administrators have left in the past year — frequent leadership churn is a warning sign families often miss.
Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.
Inspection trend
Deficiencies are more than at the previous inspection — worsening. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.
Inspection deficiencies
State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.
Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.
55 citations, most serious first. The 18 most serious are shown; the remaining 37 are one tap away and print in full.
- Immediate jeopardy · J2025-10-30 · tag F0627 — isolatedEnsure the transfer/discharge meets the resident's needs/preferences and that the resident is prepared for a safe transfer/discharge.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to provide and document sufficient preparation and orientation of resident to ensure safe and orderly transfer or discharge from the facility and ensure the orientation was provided in a form and manner that the resident could understand for one (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for discharge.1. On 09/26/2025, the facility failed to ensure Resident #1's post-discharge destination and continued care provider could meet Resident #1's needs. Resident #1 required medication management and supervision with activities of daily livings, which the shelter did not provide. 2. On 09/26/2025 the facility failed to ensure Resident #1 was admitted to the shelter, as Resident #1 was left standing in line. On 10/03/2025 Resident #1 was found by a high school security guard approximately 14 miles away from the shelter where he had been dropped off to.This deficient practice could place residents at risks of accidents, and could result in serious harm, injury,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2025-03-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — patternEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure the resident's environment remained as free of accident hazards as is possible and received adequate supervision and assistance for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for Incident and accidents. 1.The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #1 to prevent her from having injuries and falls from 02/02/25 to 02/08/25; subsequently Resident #1 sustained a left wrist fracture of unknown origin on 02/02/25, fell on [DATE] sustained a lip bleed, found on the floor next to her bed on 02/07/25 and on 02/08/25 she had left sided facial bruising, a swollen chin, and dark reddish gums. She was later diagnosed at the hospital on [DATE] with a hematoma of her jaw and previously diagnosed left wrist fracture. 2. The facility failed to provide supervision in the B Hall Memory Care unit when 2 CNA's were discovered asleep in the unit at the nurses station with the light off on 03/05/25. 3. The facility failed to…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolatedImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to immediately consult with the resident's physician when there was a need to alter treatment significantly (that is, a need to discontinue an existing form of treatment due to adverse consequences, or to commence a new form of treatment) for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for change in condition. LVN A failed to contact Resident #1's Dr. on 06/08/24, for his drastically decreased BP and he was not transferred to the hospital until 06/09/24. Subsequently, Resident #1 was currently at the hospital diagnosed with septic shock and on a ventilator machine (mechanical life support). An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 06/13/24. An IJ Template was provided to the facility on [DATE] at 10:00 am. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 06/14/24 at 5:00 pm, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of isolated and a severity level of no actual harm with the potential for more than minimal harm that was not…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolatedProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record reviews and interviews the facility failed to ensure that based on the comprehensive assessment of a resident, residents receive treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the residents' choices for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for quality of care. 1. LVN A failed to provide appropriate treatment and care on 06/08/24 as indicated: a. Did not monitor and check Resident#1's BP after 12:08 pm. b. Did not notify the DON and LVN B, about Resident #1's change in condition and need for continued BP monitoring. c. Did not follow Resident #1's Nephrologist's Doctor order and this facility's Care Plan to ensure the resident did not experience possible fluid overload. 2. LVN B failed to check on Resident #1 throughout her shift and she said she did a BP check on Resident #1 at 5:00 am on 06/09/24 but failed to document it. An Immediate Jeopardy (IJ) was identified on 06/13/24. An IJ Template was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — patternImmediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to immediately consult with the physician of a significant change in the resident's health status; or a need to alter treatment significantly for 1 (Resident #1) of 3 residents reviewed for parameters to notify Physician of critical blood pressure levels. 1. The facility failed to notify Resident #'1's physician and administer PRN Clonidine, when Resident #1's systolic blood pressure was over 170, as ordered, on at least four days; on 10/17/23 when the systolic blood pressure was 200, 10/27/23 when the systolic blood pressure was 196, 11/08/23 when the systolic blood pressure was 185, and 11/09/23 when the systolic blood pressure was 181, all when Resident#1's systolic blood pressure was over 170. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] after a change of condition, Resident #1's initial blood pressure was documented as 214/117, Resident #1 did not eat breakfast, could not swallow, and jaws shifted to the left. Resident #1's hospital admission…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — patternProvide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide treatment and care in accordance with professional standards of practice, the comprehensive person-centered care plan, and the resident's choices for one resident (Resident #1) of three residents reviewed for change in physical, mental, or psychosocial status. The facility failed to give Resident #1 her PRN anti-hypertensive medication as ordered and noted on the care plan. The facility failed monitor and document signs and symptoms of malignant hypertension as noted on the care plan for Resident #1. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] after a change of condition, when Resident #1's initial blood pressure was documented as 214/117, Resident #1 did not eat breakfast, could not swallow, and jaws shifted to the left. Resident #1's hospital admission diagnoses was a hemorrhagic stroke. Resident #1 passed away at the hospital on [DATE]. An immediate Jeopardy was identified on 12/29/23. While the Immediate Jeopardy was…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Immediate jeopardy · Kcited before2024-01-02 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed ensure residents were free of any significant medication errors for one (Residents #1) of three residents reviewed for medications. Nurse C failed to give the PRN Clonidine as ordered by the physician for Resident #1 on 10/17/23, 10/27/23, 11/08/23, and 11/09/23, when Resident #'s systolic blood pressure was over 170. Resident #1 was sent to the hospital on [DATE] after a change of condition, when Resident #1's initial blood pressure was documented as 214/117, Resident #1 did not eat breakfast, could not swallow, and jaws shifted to the left. Resident #1's hospital admission diagnoses was a hemorrhagic stroke. Resident #1 passed away at the hospital on [DATE]. An immediate Jeopardy was identified on 12/29/23. While the Immediate Jeopardy was removed on 01/02/24, the facility remained out of compliance at a scope of pattern and a severity level of actual harm that is not Immediate Jeopardy, due to the facility continuation of in-servicing and monitoring…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Actual harm · Gcited before2025-11-18 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure that each resident received adequate supervision and assistive devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 4 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for supervision. The facility failed to provide adequate supervision for Resident #1 during a routine incontinent change which involved CNA A and CNA B which led to Resident #1 hitting their head on the bedside table. This failure could place residents at risk of injury. Findings include: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet reflected a [AGE] year-old female who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of Resident #1's Care Plan dated 6/19/2025 reflected Resident #1 had diagnoses which included Dementia (Decline in cognitive abilities such as memory, thinking, problem solving, judgment), Hypertension (High blood pressure), Chronic Kidney Disease (Kidneys lose the ability to filter waste), Osteo Arthritis (Joint disease that causes pain in the joints), Neuropathy (Damaged nerves), Constipation…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-06-25 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy for one (Residents #1) of 5 residents reviewed for resident rights. The facility failed to ensure CNA A did not leave her computer tablet unattended on a bedside table that was located on the 200 hall. It was unlocked and displayed Resident #1 was incontinent for bowel movements. This failure could place residents at risk of having their medical information disclosed by residents and visitors which could cause embarrassment, frustration, and feelings of decreased privacy, resulting in a decline in their health and psycho-social well-being. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] and signed by the DON revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE]. He had a BIMS score of 10 (moderately impaired cognition), walked without assistance and needed supervisory with touch assist for all ADLs. He was always continent of bowel and bladder and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0637 — isolatedAssess the resident when there is a significant change in condition
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure within 14 days after the facility determined, or should have determined, that there had been a significant change assessment completed for the resident's mental condition for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for resident assessments. The facility failed to ensure a comprehensive MDS significant change assessment was completed for Resident #2, after he made suicidal ideation statements on 05/07/26, 05/18/26 and 05/25/26, 06/03/26 and 06/22/26. This failure could place residents at risk of not getting all of their medical needs met, which could cause residents to harm themselves resulting in decreased health and psycho-social well-being. The findings included:Record review of Resident #2's admission MDS assessment dated [DATE] and signed by the DON on 05/18/26 revealed, a [AGE] year-old male who admitted [DATE], his BIMS score was 14 (cognition intact). For section D. Resident mood interview (Say to resident: Over the last 2 weeks, have you…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2026-06-25 · tag F0641 — isolatedEnsure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's assessments accurately reflected their statuses for 1 (Resident #2) of 5 residents reviewed for resident assessments. 1) The facility failed to ensure SW B correctly completed Resident #2's 05/07/26 MDS assessment. SW B did not review and capture his suicidal ideations in the prior 14 days. SW B failed to ask this resident if in the past 14 days did, he have suicidal ideations; subsequently Resident #2 made suicidal statements which were within 14 days of this assessment and not included in Section D.0500 (i).2) The facility failed to ensure SW B correctly completed Resident #2's 06/02/26 Quarterly MDS assessment. SW B did not review and capture his suicidal ideations. SW B failed to ask this resident if in the last 14 days did, he have suicidal ideations; subsequently Resident #2 made suicidal statements which were within 14 days of this assessment and not included in Section D.0500 (i).These failures could place residents with…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-04-16 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of each resident for one (Resident #1) of 3 residents, reviewed for medications. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's order for Wellbutrin 300 mg was not duplicated on the MAR.The facility failed to ensure the staff signed off on the MAR correctly. Staff signed off that they administered 600 mg when they only administered 300 mg. This failure placed residents at risk for medication related errors and medication overdose.Findings included: Review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 02/12/26, reflected the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her BIMS score was 15, indicating her cognitive skills were intact. Her diagnoses included heart failure and end-stage kidney disease. There were no diagnoses for anxiety disorder or…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's 1 of 1 kitchen reviewed for food safety. The facility failed to ensure food items in the dry storage room were properly stored, sealed, and protected from exposure to air in accordance with professional food service standards. The facility failed to ensure food items in the walk-in refrigerator were properly stored, sealed, and protected from exposure to air in accordance with professional food service standards. The garbage receptacle at the #1 handwashing sink contained items other than paper towels. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness, cross contamination, and infection.During an observation of the #1 handwashing sink's garbage receptacle on 02/17/2026 at 9:29 a.m., the following was revealed: 1 of 2 handwashing sinks had garbage receptacles that contained items other than disposable paper towels, including plastic cups and several tin cans. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2026-02-19 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an effective pest control program for 1 of 1 facility for 119 residents reviewed for pests, Gnats were observed in rooms and hallways on Hall A (first floor), Hall B, (secured unit), and Hall C (second floor), in the facility. This failure could place residents at risk of an increased exposure to pests and vector-borne diseases and infections.Findings included: During an observation on 02/17/2026 at 9:17 a.m., Hall A (first floor) room [ROOM NUMBER] had three gnats crawling in the bathroom sink. During an observation on 02/17/2026 at 9:18 a.m., Hall A (first floor) room [ROOM NUMBER] had five gnats crawling in the bathroom sink. During an observation on 02/17/2026 at 9:30 a.m., a medication cart on Hall A (first floor) had three gnats crawling on top of the cart. During an observation on 02/17/2026 at 9:32 a.m., Hall A (first floor) room [ROOM NUMBER]-2 (bed next to the window) had six gnats crawling on the bedside table. During…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment for 1 of 3 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for care plans:The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's comprehensive care plans reflected that she had refused her medications on and off for the past 2 months. This failure could affect residents by placing them at risk of not receiving care and services to meet their needs. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet dated 02/19/2026 revealed a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included congestive heart failure, chronic kidney disease, blindness in right and left eye, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and chronic viral hepatitis C. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-19 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an Infection Prevention and Control Program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable diseases and infections for two (Resident #78, and #124) of four residents reviewed for infection control. The facility MA A failed to disinfect the blood pressure cuff in between vital sign checks for Resident #78, and Resident #124. The facility MA A failed to wash hands prior to eye drops administration to Resident #78. This failure could place residents at risk for spread of infection through cross-contamination. Findings included: Record review of Resident #78's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 11/24/2025, reflected a [AGE] year-old female, admitted [DATE], diagnoses included hypertension (high blood pressure), diabetes (high sugar), and heart failure (weak heart). Resident #78's BIMs score of 14 indicated the resident was cognitively intact and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to store all drugs and biologicals in locked compartments and permit only authorized personnel to have access to the keys for one (Hall C Nurse Cart) of five medication carts reviewed. LVN A failed to ensure that Hall C nurse cart was not left unlocked and unattended with the keys still in the lock mechanism in between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. This failure placed residents at risk of having access to medications not ordered for them or more than recommended doses.Observation and interview on 02/03/26 at 3:48 PM, revealed a medication cart on C hall was left unlocked and unattended with the keys still in the lock mechanism in the middle of C hall between rooms [ROOM NUMBERS]. The MDS nurse walked toward the cart while surveyor was standing by the unlocked and unattended medication cart, and she pushed the lock mechanism in (indicating locking position) and she pulled the keys out of the lock mechanism. She stated, this cart should be locked. She…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-02-04 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designed to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infections for 1 (Resident #1) of 7 residents reviewed for infection control. 1.LVN B and CNA C failed to wear PPE gown during incontinence care for Resident #1 who was on Enhanced Barrier Precautions for G-tube and Wounds. 2. LVN B failed to change her gloves and failed to perform hand hygiene when she did not remove her dirty gloves after finishing incontinence care for Resident #1 before connecting her feeding tube back to the feeding. These failures could place residents at risk of infectious disease. Resident #1 Record review of Resident #1's admission record dated 02/03/26 revealed a [AGE] year-old female with an initial admission to the on 12/11/23 and readmitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included senile degeneration of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
Show the remaining 37 citations
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-01-13 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review the facility failed to ensure medications were secured and inaccessible to unauthorized staff and residents for one medication cart on the second floor reviewed for medication storage.The facility failed to ensure the 2nd floor medication cart was locked when unattended. This failure could place residents at risk for drug diversion, drug overdose, and accidental administration of medications to the wrong residents. Findings included:During an observation and interview, on 01/13/2026 at 2:30 p.m., the second-floor nurse's station medication cart was unlocked. Observation of the unattended cart revealed the surveyor opened the top drawer and it contained biological and medications for residents. The MDS Coordinator walked up, said shit, closed the drawer, locked the cart, and walked behind the nurse's station. When asked who was responsible for the medication cart, LVN A denied the cart was observed unlocked. When informed the cart was observed unlocked and unattended and the MDS coordinator locked the cart, LVN A provided an…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-03-07 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — patternDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights set forth at, that includes measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that are identified in the comprehensive assessment. The comprehensive care plan must describe the services that are to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for care plans. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's care plan addressed her combative behavior (aggressive and eager to fight or argue) as documented by RN Q on 01/26/25 and ADON F on 01/27/25. Subsequently, on 02/06/25 at 10:22 pm, LVN D and CNA I said Resident #1 was about to fall and as they tried to stop her from falling, Resident #1 became combative and hit her lip which caused her lip to bleed. And on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0609 — failed to report abuse allegations — isolatedTimely report suspected abuse, neglect, or theft and report the results of the investigation to proper authorities.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews the facility failed to ensure all alleged violations involving abuse, neglect, including injuries of unknown source were reported immediately, but not later than 2 hours after the allegation was made, if the events that caused the allegation involved abuse or resulted in serious bodily injury, to the administrator of the facility and to other officials (including to the State Survey Agency where state law provides for jurisdiction in long-term care facilities) in accordance with State law through established procedures for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for injury of unknown origin reporting. The facility failed to ensure on 02/02/25 Resident #1's injury of unknown origin was reported to HHSC when the staff did not know why she had a swollen left wrist that was later diagnosed as fractured (broken). This failure could place fall risk residents of getting more injuries, bruises, and pain which could result in emotional turmoil and cause decreased…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-03-07 · tag F0610 — failed to investigate and act on abuse reports — isolatedRespond appropriately to all alleged violations.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews, and record reviews the facility failed to ensure In response to allegations of abuse, neglect, or mistreatment, have evidence that all alleged violations were thoroughly investigated to prevent further potential abuse, neglect, or mistreatment while the investigation was in progress. And report the results of all investigations to the administrator or his or her designated representative and to other officials in accordance with State law, including to the State Survey Agency, within 5 working days of the incident for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for Abuse and Neglect. The facility failed to ensure on 02/02/25 Resident #1's injury of unknown origin was investigated and report sent to HHSC when the staff did know why she had a swollen left wrist that was later diagnosed as fractured (broken). This failure could place residents at risk of getting more injuries, bruises, and pain which could result in emotional turmoil and cause decreased health and psycho-social…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-02-05 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — patternEnsure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free of significant medication errors for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for medications errors in that: The facility administered Clonidine to Resident #2 on multiple occasions outside of the ordered blood pressure parameters. This failure could place residents receiving blood pressure medications at risk for low blood pressure. Findings include: Review of Resident #2's Face Sheet and Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident #2 was a was a [AGE] year-old male admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses in part including End Stage Renal Disease (final, permanent stage of chronic kidney disease where kidneys no longer function on their own), and Essential Hypertension (high blood pressure not caused by another medical condition). Review of Care Plan dated 10/15/24 reflected Resident #2 had hypertension which included an intervention to give antihypertensive medications as ordered. Review of Physician G's physician…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2025-02-05 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — isolatedProtect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the right to be free from misappropriation of property for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for misappropriation of property. The facility failed to prevent the misappropriation of Resident #1's Hydrocodone-Acetaminophen, a medication to help with pain. This failure could place residents at risk for not receiving prescribed medications. Findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], was a [AGE] year-old male, and his diagnoses in part included Depression, difficulty in walking, phantom limb syndrome with pain (feeling pain in a missing body part after amputation), polyneuropathy (malfunction of many nerves outside of the brain or spinal cord), and chronic pain syndrome. The Care Plan dated 11/07/24 reflected Resident #1 required pain management related to chronic pain syndrome, polyneuropathy, and phantom pain and included the intervention to administer pain medication as per…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-02-05 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to determine that drug records were in order and that an account of all controlled drugs were maintained and periodically reconciled for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for accurate reconciliation of controlled medications. The facility failed to have an accurate reconciliation and accounting of all controlled medications for one resident (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for accurate reconciliation of controlled medications. This failure could place residents receiving controlled medications at risk for a lack of availability of controlled medications or unnecessary interruptions in receiving controlled medication due to possible drug diversion. Findings included: The Minimum Data Set (MDS) dated [DATE] reflected Resident #1 was admitted on [DATE], was a [AGE] year-old male, and his diagnoses in part included Depression, difficulty in walking, phantom limb syndrome with pain (feeling pain in a missing body part after…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-12-12 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for 1 of 1 kitchen, in that: - The facility failed to ensure food items stored in walk-in cooler were labeled and dated. - The facility failed to ensure foods stored in the walk-in cooler were stored in a sanitary manner. - The facility failed to ensure foods stored in the walk-in freezer were labeled and dated. - The facility failed to ensure personal food items were not stored in the preparation cooler. These failures could place residents who received meals and/or snacks from the kitchen at risk for food borne illness. The findings included: Observation of the facility's preparation cooler, walk in cooler and walk in freezer on 12/12/24 from 9:57 a.m. to 10:12 a.m., accompanied by the DM, revealed the following: - The preparation cooler had a half-filled water bottle labeled with DA B's name on the second shelf. - The walk-in cooler had an undated or labeled Ziploc bag containing a package of opened…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-14 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine was clean and free of mildew and lime. 2. The facility failed to discard open items stored in the refrigerator that were not sealed. 3. The facility failed to ensure raw meat was stored separately from raw food. 4. The facility failed to ensure an opened food item in dry storage was dated. These failures could place residents at risk for food-borne illness and cross contamination. Findings Include: Observation of the ice machine on 11/12/2024 at 8:56 am revealed the following: The machine inner guard had black build up along the top of the inner guard. Observation of the walk-in refrigerator on 11/12/2024 at 9:01 am revealed the following: -1 30 lb box of bacon dated 11/4/2024 was exposed to the air and an uncooked egg was observed inside the box with the bacon. Observation of the dry storage on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · E2024-07-19 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — patternHonor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to treat each resident with respect and dignity and care for each resident in a manner and in an environment that promotes maintenance or enhancement of his or her quality of life, for three of six residents (Residents #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) reviewed for quality of life. The facility failed to answer Resident #1 and Resident #2 call lights in a timely manner. The failure could place residents at risk for complications associated with delayed care such as skin breakdown and dignity issues. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated July 18, 2024, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with active diagnosis that included Monoplegia (paralysis) of lower limb, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, unspecified mood disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, Contracture of muscle right upper arm (permanent tightening of muscle fibers that limit movement). Interview…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-07-19 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — patternProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received necessary services to maintain personal hygiene for three (Resident #1, Resident #2, and Resident #3) of five residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to provide shower/bath ADL care according to resident care plan for June 2024. These failures placed residents at risk of not receiving necessary services to maintain good personal hygiene and decreased self- esteem. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Face Sheet dated July 18, 2024, reflected she was an [AGE] year old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with active diagnosis that included Monoplegia (paralysis) of lower limb, type 2 diabetes, major depressive disorder, unspecified mood disorder, anxiety disorder, muscle weakness, Contracture of muscle right upper arm (permanent tightening of muscle fibers that limit movement). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-06-14 · tag F0770 — failed to provide lab services — isolatedProvide timely, quality laboratory services/tests to meet the needs of residents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on record review and interviews the facility failed to provide or obtain laboratory services to meet the needs of its residents for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for laboratory services. ADON AA failed to follow-up with Resident #1's PA/MD after he received abnormal lab results on 06/03/24. ADON AA failed to get Resident #1's lab reviewed by PA D on 06/05/24. ADON AA faxed lab results for three residents on 06/05/24 but PA D faxed back responses for only two of the residents' labs which did not include Resident #1's labs. This failure could place residents at risk of not getting adequate and timely care and treatment which could cause declines in their health and psychosocial well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a male who admitted to this facility 08/03/23 with a BIMS Score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment). He had 1 sided upper extremity impairment and 2 sided lower extremity impairment and substantial maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-14 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain medical records on each resident that were complete and accurately documented for one (Resident #1) of eight residents reviewed for medical records. The facility failed to ensure LVN A and LVN B completely document Resident #1's BP checks and monitoring after Resident #1's BP dropped to 83/44 on 06/08/24 and 06/09/24. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1's standing orders from his nephrologist for a renal diet with fluid restrictions was added to his facility Doctor's orders. These failures could affect all residents and cause errors in care, treatments and diets which could result in a decline in their health and psycho-social well-being. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed a male who admitted to this facility 08/03/23 with a BIMS Score of 10 (moderate cognitive impairment). He had 1 sided upper extremity impairment and 2 sided lower extremity impairment and substantial maximal…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to respect the resident's right to personal privacy for one (Resident #1) of five residents reviewed for privacy. The facility failed to ensure RN A locked the computer, which showed Resident #1's medication and personal information, after he walked away and left the computer unattended. This failure could place residents at risk of having medical information exposed to others. This failure could cause residents to feel uncomfortable and disrespected. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet. printed on 05/29/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses of fracture of lower left tibia (fracture in the lower leg), type 2 diabetes (high blood sugars), and hyperlipidemia (in excess of lipids or fats in the blood). Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment, dated 05/16/24, reflected Resident #1 had a BIMS score of 15, which indicated she was cognitively intact.…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-05-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure a resident who was unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming and personal and oral hygiene for one (Resident #2) of five residents reviewed for ADL care. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received bath/showers three times a week as per their shower schedule. This failure could place residents at risk of skin breakdown, infection and loss of self-esteem. The findings include: Record review of Resident #2's face sheet, printed on 05/29/24, revealed a [AGE] year-old male who admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses of acute osteomyelitis of the left ankle and foot(bone infection), peripheral vascular disease (reduced circulation of blood to a body part, other than the brain or heart, due to a narrowed or blocked blood vessel), major depressive disorder, type II diabetes (increase blood sugar levels) and acute infective endocarditis (inflammation of the inner…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-04-08 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolatedProvide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with pressure ulcers received necessary treatment and services, consistent with professional standards of practice, to promote healing, prevent infection and prevent new ulcers from developing for 1 (Resident #1) of 5 residents reviewed for pressure ulcer treatment. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received wound care according to physician orders. This failure could place the resident at risk of worsening wounds. Findings included: Review of Resident #1's undated admission Record revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses that included paralysis following a motor vehicle crash, chronic non-pressure ulcers, and bone infection to lower back. Review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS, dated [DATE], revealed a BIMS score of 15, indicating she was cognitively intact. Her Functional Status revealed she required extensive assistance with all of her ADLs. Her Skin…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-03-15 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents who were unable to carry out activities of daily living received the necessary services to maintain good nutrition, grooming, and personal and oral hygiene for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #1 received incontinent care on 03/15/24. This failure could place residents at risk of impaired skin integrity, and decreased feelings of self-worth and dignity. Findings Include: Record review of Resident #1's electronic face sheet, dated 03/15/24, reflected a [AGE] year-old male, who was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #1 had diagnoses which included obesity (excessive fat deposits), osteomyelitis (infection of the bone), Encephalopathy (change in brain function), Cellulitis (bacterial skin infection), Difficulty in Walking, Muscle Weakness, Lack of Coordination, Schizophrenia (chronic brain disorder), Acute Congestive Heart Failure (heart does not pump blood…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0553 — failed to let residents help plan their care — isolatedAllow resident to participate in the development and implementation of his or her person-centered plan of care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure the resident had the right to participate in the development and implementation of his person-centered plan of care for one (Resident #1) of one resident reviewed for person-centered plans of care. The facility failed to include Resident #1 in his Care Plan Conference. This failure could affect residents and place them at-risk by contributing to inadequate care. The findings included: Record review of Resident #1's face sheet, printed 01/26/2024, revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male who was admitted to the facility initially on 08/03/2023 and re admitted on [DATE]. The resident had diagnoses which included osteomyelitis (a serious infection of the bone that can be either acute or chronic), type 2 diabetes (a condition that happens because of a problem in the way the body regulates and uses sugar as a fuel), hypertension(high blood pressure) Record review of Resident #1's initial MDS dated [DATE] revealed a BIMS score of 10 which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0583 — failed to protect personal privacy — isolatedKeep residents' personal and medical records private and confidential.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents had a right to personal privacy for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for personal privacy in that: Caregiver A failed to ensure the door to Resident #2's room was closed while she assisted in dressing Resident #2. This failure could place residents at risk for low self-esteem, loss of dignity, and decreased quality of life due to a lack of privacy during their care. Findings included: Review of Resident #2's face sheet, printed 01/16/2024, reflected he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypercapnia (impairment of neuromuscular transmission, mechanical defect of the ribcage and fatigue of the respiratory muscles), heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs). Review of Resident #2's most recent quarterly MDS assessment, dated 10/02/2024, reflected he had a BIMS…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan for each resident, consistent with the resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet a resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accuracy of assessment . The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan was revised to include his tendency to undress himself and leave his room undressed. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care that did not fully address the resident's needs. The findings include: Review of Resident #2's face sheet, printed 01/16/2024, reflected he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypercapnia (impairment of neuromuscular transmission, mechanical defect of the ribcage and fatigue of the respiratory…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-02-01 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolatedDevelop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure comprehensive care plans were reviewed and revised by the interdisciplinary team after each assessment, which included both the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments for one of three residents (Resident #2) reviewed for accuracy of assessment . The facility failed to ensure Resident #2's care plan was revised to include his tendency to undress himself and leave his room undressed. This failure could place residents at risk of receiving care that did not fully address the resident's needs. The findings include: Review of Resident #2's face sheet, printed 01/16/2024, reflected he was originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included respiratory failure with hypercapnia (impairment of neuromuscular transmission, mechanical defect of the ribcage and fatigue of the respiratory muscles), heart failure (a condition that develops when your heart doesn't pump enough blood for your body's needs).…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2024-01-11 · tag F0687 — failed to care for feet properly — isolatedProvide appropriate foot care.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observations, interviews and record reviews, the facility failed to ensure residents received proper treatment and care to maintain mobility and good foot health for one (Resident #1) of four residents reviewed for podiatrist services. Resident #1 was not seen by a podiatrist for long, thick, and deformed toenails. This failure placed residents at risk of not receiving foot care consistent with professional standards of practice. Findings included: Record review of physician's active orders dated 01/2024 revealed Resident #1 was a [AGE] year-old male admitted to the facility 01/30/23. Diagnoses included high blood pressure, Type II diabetes mellitus and peripheral vascular disease (A progressive circulation disorder that involves the narrowing, blockage, or spasms in the blood vessels). The orders reflected Podiatry to eval and treat. Record review of Resident #1's quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] revealed the resident's BIMS score was 11 indicating moderately impaired cognition. The MDS assessment…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-10-18 · tag F0925 — failed to control pests — patternMake sure there is a pest control program to prevent/deal with mice, insects, or other pests.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed ensure Maintain an effective pest control program so that the facility is free of pests and rodents for 5 of 5 residents (Resident #22, Resident #34, Resident #79, Resident #92, and Resident #203) reviewed for environment. 1. The facility failed to ensure Resident #22, Resident #34, Resident #79, Resident #92 and Resident #203 had rooms free from house flies. 2. The facility failed to ensure Resident #92's previous room remained free of pests, specifically bed bugs. These failures could place residents at risk of not receiving an home free of pest and comfortable environment to live. Findings Included: Review of the most recent pest control visit dated from 11/12/22 to 10/14/2023, titled Company name Pest Services, Corrective Action Report, revealed Flying Insects. Treated areas of concern. Need inset fly lights throughout resident hallways. 09/15/23 Bed Bugs. Treated Room [Resident #92's previous room. 10/14/23 Bed Bugs. Treated Room…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolatedReasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents had the right to reside and receive services in the facility with reasonable accommodation of resident needs for 1 (Resident #253) of 5 residents reviewed for accommodation of needs. The facility failed to ensure Resident #253's call light was placed within her reach. This failure could place dependent residents at risk of injuries and unmet needs. The findings included: Review of Resident #253's face sheet, dated 10/17/23 reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included cerebral infarction (a stroke) and hypertension (high blood pressure). Review of Resident #253's care plan, dated 10/12/23, reflected the following: Focus: The resident is (High, Moderate, Low) risk for falls r/t Confusion, Gait/balance problems, Incontinence, Unaware of safety needs .Interventions/Tasks: Be sure the resident's call light is within reach and encourage the resident to use it for…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolatedDevelop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan, consistent with resident rights, that included measurable objectives and timeframes to meet the resident's medical, nursing, and mental and psychosocial needs that were identified in the comprehensive assessment and describe the services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental, and psychosocial well-being for 1 (Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed for comprehensive care plans. Residents #5's care plan did not address her use of a hand splint and towel rolls in her hand and at her elbow. This failure could affect the residents in the facility and could result in services and treatments not being provided. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 10/17/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included aphasia…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolatedProvide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to provide the necessary services for residents who are unable to carry out activities of daily living to maintain good grooming and personal hygiene for 2 (Resident #35 and Resident#41) of 8 residents reviewed for ADLs. The facility failed to ensure: 1- Resident #35 was shaved, not having facial hair, and had her fingernails cleaned and trimmed. 2- Resident #41 had his fingernails cleaned and trimmed. This failure could place residents who were dependent on staff for ADL care at risk for loss of dignity, risk for infections and a decreased quality of life. Findings include: 1- Review of Resident #35's Quarterly MDS assessment dated [DATE] reflected Resident #35 was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE] with diagnoses included hemiplegia (paralysis that affects only one side of the body) affecting right dominant side, muscle weakness, lack of coordination, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Resident #35's BIMS was 13, which…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0688 — failed to keep residents mobile / prevent decline — isolatedProvide appropriate care for a resident to maintain and/or improve range of motion (ROM), limited ROM and/or mobility, unless a decline is for a medical reason.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents received appropriate treatment and services to prevent further decrease of ROM for 1 (Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed with limited range of motion. The facility did not ensure Resident #5 was receiving contracture management to treat their contracted hands and elbow. This failure could place residents at risk for decrease in mobility, range of motion and contribute to worsening of contractures. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 10/17/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included aphasia following cerebral infarction (a comprehension and communication [reading, speaking, or writing] disorder resulting from damage or injury to the specific area in the brain after a stroke), stiffness of right hand, stiffness of left hand, contracture (a permanent tightening of the muscles, tendons, skin, and…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, observation, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services, including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals, to meet the needs of each resident for 1 (Nurses cart hall C) of 3 carts reviewed for pharmacy services. The facility failed to ensure: 1- LVN D, responsible for nurses cart in hall C, counted controlled drugs every shift change. 2- Medications in unsecure containers were immediately removed from stock. Thes failures could place residents at risk of not having the medication available due to possible drug diversion and at risk of not receiving the intended therapeutic benefit of the medication. Findings Included: Record review and random count observation of hall C nurse's cart with LVN C on 10/16/2023 at 11:52 AM revealed missing signatures for Off duty and On duty for 10/06/2023, 10/13/2023, 10/15/2023 of the narcotic count sheet. Also, the blister pack for Resident #28's…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — isolatedProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute, and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety in the facility's only kitchen reviewed for food safety. 1. The facility failed to ensure the ice machine's filter was free from holes; filter and vent was free from dust; the outside of the machine was free from calcium build up and ice chute guard was clean. 2.The facility failed to ensure food items in the kitchen, refrigerator and dry storage room were labeled and stored in accordance with the professional standards for food service. 3. The facility failed to discard items stored in the dry storage were not properly labeled or past the 'best by', consume by or expiration dates. 4. The facility failed to have Dietary staff wash hands or change gloves when they touched other surfaces while handling food or upon re-entering the kitchen. 5. The facility failed to ensure cooking utensils hanging with clean items were free from food items or liquids 6. The facility failed to ensure cooking utensils…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — isolatedSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain clinical records in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices that are complete and accurately documented for 1 (Resident #5) of 5 residents reviewed for clinical records. The facility failed to ensure staff documented that Resident #5 did not receive her medications on 10/03/23 due to being at the hospital. This failure could affect residents that received medications and place them at risk of inaccurate or incomplete clinical records. Findings included: Review of Resident #5's face sheet, dated 10/17/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. Her diagnoses included pain unspecified, disturbances of salivary secretion (an increase in saliva), and hyperlipidemia (high cholesterol). Review of Resident #5's quarterly MDS Assessment, dated 08/21/23, reflected a BIMS score of 99 indicating the resident was unable to complete the interview. Further…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · D2023-10-18 · tag F0849 — isolatedArrange for the provision of hospice services or assist the resident in transferring to a facility that will arrange for the provision of hospice services.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain information and documentation from hospice representatives and coordinate the hospice care planning process for each resident receiving hospice services, to ensure quality of care for the resident, ensuring communication with the hospice medical director, the resident's attending physician, and others participating in the provision of care for 1 (Resident #80) of 5 residents reviewed for hospice services, in that: Facility did not ensure Resident #80's hospice records were a part of their records in the facility. This deficient practice could place residents who receive hospice services at-risk of receiving inadequate end-of-life care due to a lack of documentation, coordination of care and communication of resident needs. The findings were: Review of Resident #80's face sheet, dated 10/18/23, reflected he was a [AGE] year-old male who originally admitted to the facility on [DATE] and readmitted on [DATE]. His diagnoses included…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-10-18 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — isolatedProvide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain an infection prevention and control program designated to provide a safe, sanitary, and comfortable environment and to help prevent the development and transmission of communicable disease and infection for 1 (Resident #92) of 8 residents reviewed for infection control. The facility failed to ensure: Housekeeper E donned appropriate PPE prior to entering Resident #92's isolated room, and practice proper hand hygiene between change of gloves. This failure could place residents at-risk of cross contamination which could result in infections or illness. Findings included: Record review of Resident #92's Comprehensive MDS assessment, dated 09/01/23, reflected she was a [AGE] year-old female admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including sepsis (the body's extreme response to an infection), muscle weakness, and lack of coordination. She had a BIMS score of 13 which indicated her cognition was intact. Record review of…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-01 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — isolatedEnsure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that drugs and biologicals used in the facility were secured properly for 1 of 1 nurse wound care/ treatment cart (second-floor nurse station wound care/treatment cart) reviewed for drug storage, as evidenced by: the second floor nurse station nurse wound care/treatment cart was left unlocked and unsupervised. This deficient practice could place residents at risk for harm or theft and place the facility at risk for possible drug diversion. The findings include: Observation and interview on 09/01/23 at 2:02 PM revealed an unlocked wound care/treatment cart was left unsupervised and parked by the second-floor nurse station. There was no facility staff near the cart. There was no nurse in charge of the cart at the time of observation. Nurse A walked to the cart after seeing HHSC Investigator documenting contents of Drawer #1. Nurse A stated she did not know who the cart was assigned to. Observations of the wound care/treatment cart contents on 09/01/23 at 2:02 PM revealed in part: -Drawer #1: * 5 Santyl…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-23 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — patternProcure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards for food service safety for one of three staff (Cook C) and one of one kitchen reviewed for kitchen sanitation. Cook C failed to properly wear a beard restraint while in the food preparation area. This failure could place residents at risk for food contamination and foodborne illness. Findings included: Observation on 08/23/23 at 11:30 AM of [NAME] C revealed he had facial hair on his chin. [NAME] C was observed in the kitchen walking around food, plates, and the steamtable. [NAME] C had a hair restraint on but not a beard restraint. In an interview on 08/23/23 at 1:15 PM with [NAME] C, he revealed he was only wearing a hair restraint but not a beard restraint. [NAME] C said he knew where the beard restraints were in the kitchen and had access to them he just forgot to put one on today. [NAME] C said the purpose of wearing a hair restraint was to keep his facial hair from falling into food or plates. In an interview on…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-23 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — isolatedProvide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmaceutical services (including procedures that assure the accurate acquiring, receiving, dispensing, and administering of all drugs and biologicals) to meet the needs of 1 of 2 residents (Resident #1) reviewed for pharmaceutical services. The facility failed to acquire and dispense medications to Resident #1 following admission including Keppra 750 mg used for seizure, gabapentin 800 mg used for pain, Levothyroxine 50 mg used for hypothyroidism, sertraline 100 mg used for depression, and buprenorphine hcl 2 mg used for opioid overdose. This failure could place residents receiving medication at risk of inadequate therapeutic outcomes and uncontrolled pain. Findings included: Record review of Resident #1's EHR dated 08/21/23 revealed the resident was a [AGE] year-old female, who admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses which included: cellulitis of left hand (a common bacterial skin infection that causes redness,…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-08-03 · tag F0842 — failed to keep accurate, complete medical records — patternSafeguard resident-identifiable information and/or maintain medical records on each resident that are in accordance with accepted professional standards.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure, in accordance with accepted professional standards and practices, medical records were maintained on each resident that were complete and accurately documented, for 1 of 5 residents (Resident #2) reviewed for complete and accurate records. The facility failed to document the administration or refusals of Resident #2 medication on the MARS or in the clinical record. This failure could place residents at risk of inaccurate needs or services based on comprehensive assessment. Findings included: A record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2 had diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), human immunodeficiency virus (a virus that attacks the body's immune system), and Kidney Disease (the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
- Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-08-03 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolatedEnsure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing
NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review the facility failed to ensure residents received adequate supervision and assistance devices to prevent accidents for 1 of 5 residents (Resident # 2) reviewed for accidents. The facility failed to ensure Resident #2 was provided adequate supervision during a shower. This failure could place residents at risk for falls which could result in injury, pain, and hospitalization. Findings Include: A record review of Resident #2's electronic face sheet revealed a [AGE] year-old female. She was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Resident #2's had diagnoses which included Cerebral Infarction (occurs as a result of disrupted blood flow to the brain due to problems with the blood vessels that supply it), human immunodeficiency virus (a virus that attacks the body's immune system), and Kidney Disease (the kidneys are damaged and cannot filter blood as well as they should). A record review of Resident #2's baseline care plan, dated 07/22/23, reflected she required one person physical…
This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.
“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.
- Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
- Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
- State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Fines & penalties
$193,834 in federal fines across 4 penalties. 1 Medicare payment denial on record.
- $10,539 — penalty dated 2025-10-30
- $62,504 — penalty dated 2025-03-07
- $48,641 — penalty dated 2024-05-29
- $72,150 — penalty dated 2024-01-02
- Medicare payment denial — starting 2024-02-02 for 10 days
Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.
Part of a chain
This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →
| Rating | This home | Chain avg | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall | 1 of 5 | 2.3 | -1.3 vs chain |
| Health inspection | 1 of 5 | 2.2 | -1.2 vs chain |
| Staffing | 1 of 5 | 1.7 | -0.7 vs chain |
| Quality measures | 4 of 5 | 4.3 | -0.3 vs chain |
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.
A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.
Who owns this facility
| Owner / manager | Type | Role | Share | Since |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DALLAS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT | Organization | 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST | 100% | since 11/01/2022 |
| BRADLEY, SHANNAN | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 12/11/2023 |
| CASTANEDA, EDMUNDO | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 01/10/2022 |
| CERISE, FREDERICK | Individual | CORPORATE OFFICER | — | since 03/24/2014 |
| FOREST PARK NURSING & REHABILITATION LLC | Organization | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2022 |
| GARETZ, DAVID | Individual | OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL | — | since 11/01/2022 |
| GURWITZ, SOLOMON | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/26/2025 |
| KAPLAN, ESTHER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/26/2025 |
| KAPLAN, MOSHA | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/25/2025 |
| MINDLE, ADAM | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/26/2025 |
| STERNSHEIN, JENNIFER | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/25/2025 |
| UNGER, JEFFREY | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/26/2025 |
| ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINE | Individual | INDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 06/25/2025 |
| CONTINUUM REHAB GROUP LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2022 |
| DALLAS TWO PROPERTY, LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 10/31/2022 |
| OPCO CA SKILLED MGMT INC. | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2022 |
| OPCO TEXAS SKILLED MGMT LLC | Organization | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2022 |
| BROWN, DEANDRE | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 11/01/2024 |
| LEMANUA, LEMAPU | Individual | ADP OF THE SNF | — | since 12/09/2024 |
6 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.
Follow the money — this home’s finances
Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.
About 76% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. A reported operating loss is common in this industry and is not by itself a sign of trouble — but paired with large related-party payments it can mean profit is being taken elsewhere in the ownership structure.
Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.
Cost & finances
Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.
What families pay in TX
This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Texas Medicaid page.
Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.
Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 676293. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2026-02-19, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →
Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →
Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.