No sales calls · nothing personal collected unless you ask us to · no facility pays to be here
Text size
Contrast

Carmel Hills Wellness & Rehabilitation

810 East Walnut, Independence, MO 64050 · For profit - Limited Liability company · 194 certified beds · (816) 461-9600 Medicare & Medicaid certified

Need help choosing, fast? Free, unbiased: Eldercare Locator 1-800-677-1116
Abuse/neglect citation on record (F0602) — cited Oct 2024Behavioral-health or dementia-care citations — no harm found (F0740, F0758)1 immediate-jeopardy citation$20,787 in federal fines
Insights

This home has serious findings on its record. Read them closely before you consider it.

In its favor
  • fewer deficiencies at its most recent standard inspection than at the one before — a sign of improvement
Worth asking about
  • it has an abuse, neglect, or exploitation citation (F0602), cited Oct 2024
  • it has a citation for its abuse-prevention policies, restraint use, or reporting and investigating of allegations (F0604) — cited below the harm level, meaning inspectors found the process wanting but did not find a resident harmed
  • inspectors cited 1 immediate-jeopardy problem — the most serious level
  • a high number of inspection citations overall (82) — worth reading through, though larger and more-often-surveyed homes tend to accrue more lower-severity tags
  • the CMS record shows $20,787 in federal fines (most recent 2024-02-01)
  • its facility-reported quality-measure score sits well above its independent inspection score
  • its independent health-inspection rating is low (1/5)
  • its payroll-based staffing rating is low (1/5)
  • about 29% of its spending goes to commonly-owned related companies

One thing this read cannot see: what residents and families actually experience day to day. Public data misses the feel of a place — visit unannounced, ideally at a mealtime or on a weekend, talk to staff and families, and ask your tour questions.

A plain-English summary of the public record below — not a rating, ranking, or recommendation. We take no money from any facility.

1/5
CMS overall
1 of 5
Health inspectionSurveyor-assigned, ranked within your stateInspector-verified 1 of 5
StaffingFrom payroll records (PBJ) 1 of 5
Quality measuresSelf-reported by the facility 3 of 5

Worth a closer look. This home's quality-measure rating runs 2 stars above its independent health-inspection score. The inspection is done by state surveyors; the quality-measure score leans on data the facility reports about itself — so a gap this large is worth reading the inspection record for.

Location & what’s nearby

Hospital
★★★ 3/5 CMS · Emergency dept. usually open 24/7 · ER 24/7
Urgent care / clinic
815 N Noland Rd · (816) 836-9000 · Call to confirm hours
Pharmacy
Hy-Vee0.9 mi
1525 E 23rd St S · (816) 836-1177 · Call to confirm hours
Grocery
104 N Liberty St · (816) 836-0567 · Call to confirm hours
Park
707 S Crane St · (816) 325-7843 · Typically dawn to dusk
Place of worship
200 Hiram Young Ln · (816) 252-2557

Nearest of each type, straight-line distance. Hospitals come from the CMS Hospital General Information registry; everything else from Overture Maps (public data). Hospital and park hours are typical — call ahead to confirm.

Quality measures — how residents actually fare

Overall quality measures 3 of 5
Long-stay residentspeople who live here 5 of 5
Short-stay residentsrehab / post-hospital 1 of 5

Quality-measure stars summarize outcomes CMS tracks from the assessments each home submits — avoidable hospitalizations and ER visits, falls with injury, pressure ulcers, unplanned weight loss, and long-term antipsychotic use. Because the underlying data is self-reported, weigh a high score against the independent inspection record. Long-stay = permanent residents; short-stay = rehab and post-hospital stays.

Trend — is this home getting better or worse?

Over 2025-02 to 2026-06, this home’s CMS overall rating held steady at 1 stars. From monthly CMS archive snapshots.

Horizontal axis runs 2025-02 to 2026-06. That is where CMS’s monthly archive ends, so the right-hand edge of each line is that month — not today.

Overall rating1★
Inspection scorelower = better
See all quality measures vs. state & national benchmarks
MeasureThis homeState avgTypical statevs typical state
Long-stay residents whose need for help with daily activities increased6.5%18.1%15.4%better
Long-stay residents who lose too much weight5.4%5.3%5.4%typical
Long-stay residents with a catheter left in their bladder0.3%1.1%0.9%better
Long-stay residents with a urinary tract infection0.2%2.3%2.0%better
Long-stay residents with depressive symptoms80.3%18.5%6.5%worse than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents who were physically restrained0.0%0.0%0.1%better than state — see note marked double-dagger below the table
Long-stay residents with falls causing major injury3.2%4.1%3.3%typical
Long-stay residents whose ability to walk worsened5.8%17.4%16.1%better
Long-stay residents on antianxiety or hypnotic medication32.1%25.6%18.9%worse
Long-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine96.3%90.9%95.3%typical
Long-stay residents with pressure ulcers4.4%4.5%4.7%typical
Long-stay residents with worsening bladder/bowel control6.6%17.8%21.2%better
Long-stay residents who got an antipsychotic medication — see the note below the table10.9%23.5%17.1%better
Short-stay residents who newly got an antipsychotic medication2.2%2.2%1.4%worse
Short-stay residents given the seasonal flu vaccine35.6%63.5%79.4%worse
Short-stay residents rehospitalized after admission27.5%26.0%22.6%worse
Short-stay residents with an outpatient ER visit10.7%13.7%12.0%better
Long-stay hospitalizations per 1,000 resident days2.202.111.67worse
Long-stay outpatient ER visits per 1,000 resident days1.962.331.80typical

On this measure the state average is at least twice (or half) the typical state — a gap that size is usually how the state codes and reports the measure, not how its homes actually perform. Against a benchmark this state does not sit on, a “vs typical state” verdict would mostly be measuring the state, so we compare this home with its own state instead and show both averages.

§ Antipsychotics carry an FDA boxed warning — they raise the risk of death in older people with dementia-related psychosis, and are not approved for that use. So this measure is partly a read on whether a home sedates residents instead of staffing for them. But read a low rate carefully in both directions: CMS excludes residents coded with schizophrenia (and Tourette's or Huntington's) from this measure, and federal auditors have found implausible increases in schizophrenia coding since the measure was published — so a very low rate can reflect recoding rather than less prescribing. Ask the home what share of its residents carry a schizophrenia diagnosis, and how it handles behavioral symptoms without medication.

CMS quality measures, as Care Compare shows them. For most rows lower is better (fewer falls, ulcers, hospitalizations); vaccination rates are the exception. Not every row is risk-adjusted. CMS adjusts some measures for resident mix, but falls with major injury, antipsychotic use, physical restraints and the vaccination rates are unadjusted rates — so a home caring for heavier or more behaviorally complex residents can look worse on them without providing worse care. The “typical state” column is the median of the 50 state averages — not a national average of all homes. We use it because a plain average across homes is pulled badly off course by a few states’ reporting habits (long-stay depressive symptoms is the clearest case: Illinois codes it several times higher than most states, which alone lifted the all-homes figure to about twice what a typical state records). The median of state averages resists that — but it does weigh every state equally, so a large state counts no more than a small one, and it is a benchmark of our construction rather than a CMS-published figure. better/worse means the home differs from that benchmark by more than 10% of it; closer than that reads typical. CMS does not publish how many residents each measure covers, and the counts are often small — a single resident can move a rate by several points — so treat small gaps as noise. These come from data the facility reports, so weigh them against the independent inspection record above.

Short-stay rehab — if you are coming here from a hospital

Arriving from a hospital right now? Read the discharge guide → — your appeal rights, how to slow a rushed discharge, and what to ask about the numbers below.

41.9% of the Medicare patients who left this home got back to the community and stayed there for at least 31 days — which CMS reads as no different from the national rate. This is CMS’s risk-adjusted rate over 41 Medicare stays in Oct 2022–Sep 2024, and CMS’s own comparison — not ours.

41.9%U.S. median 51.5%
Got home and stayed home
9.8%U.S. median 10.7%
Went back to hospital
60.0%U.S. median 56.6%
Met the expected recovery
0.27U.S. median 0.31
Therapy hours / resident / day
0.13hours / resident / day
Physical therapy
0.11hours / resident / day
Occupational therapy
0.03hours / resident / day
Speech therapy

Met the expected recovery: 60.0% of this home’s Medicare short-stay residents left it at or above the ability to care for themselves and move around that CMS predicted for them, across 40 stays in Oct 2024–Sep 2025. The median of the 11,061 homes CMS publishes this for is 56.6%. Read it beside the getting-home figure, not instead of it: unlike the two measures above, CMS makes no better-or-worse call on this one and publishes no confidence interval for it, so this is a comparison and not a verdict — but it is the short-stay measure that separates homes most, and the one to ask about.

Therapy staffing: this home’s payroll records show 0.27 therapist hours per resident per day in 2026Q1 — more than 40% of the 13,892 homes that report any therapy hours at all.

Weekend therapy: weekend therapy hours are 6% of this home’s weekday level — it runs some therapy at the weekend, at a lower level than on weekdays. The median home that reports therapy runs 13% — weekday-focused therapy is the industry norm, not a shortfall. But recovery does not pause on a Saturday: ask what the weekend actually looks like here.

This section is about rehab stays, not living here. Most of this page — the stars, the quality measures, the inspection record — describes the home the way a permanent resident experiences it. These figures describe the short Medicare stay after a hospital discharge: a hip, a stroke, a bad infection, six weeks and home. They are different residents, different staff, often a different wing. Therapy hours are per resident in the building, not per rehab patient — the count includes every long-stay resident, and they mostly get no therapy at all. So a home with a small rehab wing inside a large nursing population reads low here even if its rehab patients get plenty of therapy, and a mostly-rehab home reads high. Use it to compare homes doing similar work, ask what a rehab resident actually gets in a day, and remember that CMS does not publish therapy minutes per patient — nobody does.

See every short-stay measure CMS publishes for this home
MeasureThis homeU.S. medianPeriod coveredCMS’s call
Got home and stayed homeRate of successful return to home or community from a SNF41.9%CMS range 27.8–56.751.5%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Went back to hospitalRate of potentially preventable hospital readmissions 30 days after discharge from a SNF9.8%CMS range 6.3–14.810.7%Oct 2022–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Met the expected recoveryPercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves and move around at discharge60.0%56.6%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Self-care at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to care for themselves at discharge50.0%52.8%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Moving around at dischargePercentage of residents who are at or above an expected ability to move around at discharge67.5%50.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication problems followed upPercentage of residents whose medications were reviewed and who received follow-up care when medication issues were identified90.0%98.7%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the next providerPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the next health care setting97.1%100.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Medication list to the familyPercentage of residents where the SNF provided a current medication list to the resident, family, and/or caregiver at final dischargenot reported — The number of residents or resident stays is too small to report. Call the facility to discuss this quality measure.
Falls with major injuryPercentage of SNF residents who experience one or more falls with major injury during their SNF stay0.0%0.0%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
New or worsened pressure ulcersPercentage of residents with pressure ulcers/pressure injuries that are new or worsened5.7%1.9%Oct 2024–Sep 2025CMS makes no comparison for this measure
Infections that led to hospitalPercentage of infections residents got during their SNF stay that resulted in hospitalization6.3%CMS range 3.8–10.47.1%Oct 2023–Sep 2024no different from U.S.
Medicare spending per stayMedicare Spending Per Beneficiary (MSPB) for residents in SNFs1.451.02Oct 2022–Sep 2024CMS makes no comparison for this measure

From the CMS Skilled Nursing Facility Quality Reporting Program — Medicare short-stay outcomes, which is a different dataset from the long-stay quality measures above and describes a different set of residents. Where CMS risk-adjusts a measure we show its adjusted rate, and the CMS range beside it is the confidence interval CMS publishes: a home whose range is wide is a home with few stays, where one patient moves the number several points. Read the period column. These measures do not share a window — the claims-based ones (getting home, readmission, spending) lag by a year or more, because a stay has to finish and its claims settle before it can be counted. CMS’s call is CMS’s, not ours: it is the only place anyone tests whether this home differs from the national rate at all, and most homes on most measures do not. Two caveats on it. CMS tests only three of these measures — getting home, readmission, and infections that led to hospital; on the other nine it publishes a rate and no comparison, and rather than compute a verdict CMS declined to make, we say so in the column. And on readmission almost every home in the country lands on “no different”, so that row separates homes far less than getting-home does — which is why met the expected recovery, a measure CMS does not test but which spreads across the whole range, is called out above the table rather than left in this list. The U.S. median column is our own, taken across every home CMS publishes that measure for in this same file; it is not a CMS-published benchmark. Homes CMS gives no rate for are left out of it rather than counted as zero. Medicare spending per stay is a ratio, not a percentage — 1.00 means this home’s Medicare spending for a stay matched the national figure CMS compares it against, and it measures cost to Medicare, not quality of care.

Staffing

0.30
RN hours/ resident / day
0.41
LPN hours/ resident / day
2.04
Aide hours/ resident / day
2.75
Total nurse hours/ resident / day
0.18
RN hoursweekends
54.7%
Total nursing turnover
44.4%
RN turnover

How full it usually is: this home is certified for 194 beds and averages 156.8 residents a day — about 81% occupied, or roughly 37 beds typically open. It usually has some room. This is a CMS average, not live availability — no public source publishes real-time vacancies, and a home can be full the day you call. Confirm with the home, and if you need a Medicaid bed specifically, ask about that separately: a home with open beds may still not have an open Medicaid bed.

Against a benchmark — not a legal minimum. In May 2024 CMS finalized the first federal staffing floor for nursing homes: 3.48 total nurse hours per resident per day, including 0.55 RN hours and 2.45 nurse-aide hours. Its hour requirements never took effect and are no longer on the books. Homes had until 2026 (2027 if rural) to comply, and that deadline never arrived: a federal court vacated the hour requirements in April 2025 (CMS has appealed), Congress then barred enforcement until 2034, and CMS formally repealed them by rule effective February 2026. This home is not required to meet these numbers, and is not violating anything by missing them. We still show the comparison because the figures are CMS’s own published estimate of adequate staffing, which makes them a useful yardstick — but they are our benchmark, not federal law: this home’s total nurse staffing of 2.75 hrs/resident/day is below the 3.48-hour benchmark and RN staffing of 0.30 is below the 0.55-hour RN benchmark and nurse-aide staffing of 2.04 is below the 2.45-hour aide benchmark. What federal law does require today is unchanged: “sufficient” nursing staff for residents’ needs and an RN on duty at least 8 consecutive hours a day, 7 days a week (42 CFR 483.35). Those are judged by inspectors on site, not by these averages, so read this comparison alongside the inspection record rather than as a pass/fail.

Weekend coverage: total nurse staffing is 2.46 hrs/resident/day on weekends vs 2.86 on weekdays — 14% thinner on weekends. RN hours go from 0.35 to 0.18 per resident-day. (Payroll-based daily records; the national median home is 15% thinner on weekends.)

This home’s total nursing-staff turnover of 55% is about the same as the national median of 45%.

Payroll-based (PBJ) staffing hours, as reported for Jan–Mar 2026 (CMS PBJ CY2026Q1) — the most recent quarter CMS has published, so they can lag a change of operator or staffing agency. Higher is generally better. Registered-nurse coverage and weekend staffing are the numbers families most often overlook — an RN on site matters most when something goes wrong, and coverage usually thins on weekends. High turnover means residents rarely see the same caregiver twice. One caveat: these are hours as reported, not adjusted for how sick or heavy-care this home’s residents are. CMS separately publishes a case-mix-adjusted view; we show the reported hours. A home caring for higher-acuity residents needs more hours to deliver the same care, so compare these figures against homes doing similar work, and read them next to the inspection record rather than alone.

Inspection trend

23
deficiencies at the latest standard inspection (2024-11-25)
28
at the previous standard inspection (2023-03-29)

Deficiencies are fewer than at the previous inspection — improving. Fewer citations over time suggests a home is fixing problems; a rising count is a warning sign — though two surveys are a short record, and survey teams differ. These counts are from the standard annual health survey only; the full citation list below may also include findings from complaint investigations, so the two won’t always add up.

Inspection deficiencies

State health-inspection citations, most serious first. Each carries an F-code (the federal rule it cites, e.g. F-684 = quality of care) and a letter A–L marking how serious and how widespread the problem was — we translate that grid into the plain tiers shown here. Wording is the official federal description.

ABCDEFGHIJKL

Each letter is a CMS scope-severity level; highlighted ones are where this home has citations. A–C = no harm found; D–F = potential for harm; G–I = actual harm; J–L = immediate jeopardy. Within each band the later letter is the more widespread finding (an isolated G is one resident; a widespread I is a pattern), so rightward and downward is worse.

82 citations, most serious first. The 12 most serious are shown; the remaining 70 are one tap away and print in full.

  • Immediate jeopardy · Jcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from accidents for two sampled residents (Resident #1 and #3) out of six sampled residents. On 1/5/24 about 10:15 P.M., Certified Nurse Assistant (CNA) A transferred Resident #1 without using the Hoyer lift (a mechanical means to transfer a resident) from the wheelchair to the bed. During the transfer CNA A realized it was not safe to continue and lowered the resident to the floor. CNA A and CNA B then transferred the resident from the floor to bed by placing their arms under the resident's arms, one on each side and lifting the resident up. They did not use a gait belt or mechanical lift to transfer the resident back to his/her bed. Facility staff did not report the fall or assess the resident after the fall. The resident had an increase in yelling behavior throughout the night and was noted as not very responsive to questions being asked, pale in color, and yelling out in pain when turned from side to side…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Actual harm · Gcited before2020-03-09 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to identify a change in condition in a resident including a decrease of alertness, decreased blood pressure, and decreased oxygen saturation; to notify the resident's physician of the resident's change in condition in a timely manner; to transfer a resident to a hospital when requested by the resident's family in a timely manner, resulting in the resident requiring transportation to the hospital by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and admission to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) due to critically low blood pressure for one sampled resident (Resident #316) out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 164 residents. Record review of the facility Change of Condition Notification policy dated February 2019 showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure that residents, family, legal representatives, and physicians are informed of changes in the resident's condition in a timely manner. -An acute change of condition (ACOC) is a sudden, clinically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2026-03-31 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide supervision for one sampled resident (Resident #3), out of three sampled residents, when on 3/19/26 Floor Tech (FT) A did not secure the door to the secured unit resulting in the resident exiting the facility and later being found in the community and sent to the Emergency Room. The facility census was 154 residents.On 3/31/26 the Administrator and Director of Nursing (DON) were notified of past non-compliance which occurred on 3/19/26. All staff received education prior to working their next shift. The deficiency was corrected on 3/20/26. Review of the facility's Wandering and Elopement Policy, dated August 2020, showed:-The facility identified residents at risk for elopement and minimized any possible injury because of the elopement.-A licensed nurse assessed each resident for elopement risk and implemented preventative interventions were documented in the resident's medical record. 1. Review of Resident #3's face sheet, undated, showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the sprinkler heads above the food preparation and food serving areas, free from dust and grease; maintain the oven mittens in good repair; maintain the drainage pipes, metal fixtures and walls under the dishwasher area, free of a buildup of grime and discarded dishes; ensure items (lemon juice and beef base), were refrigerated; maintain the handwashing sink free of obstructions; maintain hot foods ( pureed French Toast and regular French Toast) at or close to 135 ºF ( degrees Fahrenheit) at the steam table; to ensure that fresh fruits ( grapes) were washed prior to mixing them with the fruit salad for breakfast and to ensure Dietary Aide (DA) B use tongs or gloves while he/she handled French Toast from the steam table. This practice potentially affected 143 residents who received food from the kitchen. The facility census was 143 residents. 1. Observations on 5/14/25 at 12:17 P.M., during the lunch meal, showed: - A buildup of grease and dust on the sprinkler heads and ceiling tiles over the food serving and food…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2025-05-21 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hot foods (vegetables on 5/14/25) and (French Toast on 5/16/25) were at or close to 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) for two different meals. This practice potentially affected at least four residents (Residents #11, #3, #2 and #13) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 143 residents. Review of the facility's policy entitled Food Temperatures and revised on 12/20, showed: - Purpose: To provide the nutrition services department with guidelines for food preparation and service temperatures. - Policy: Foods prepared and served in the facility will be served at proper temperatures to ensure food safety. - Procedure: Measuring Food Temperature It is recommended to use a thermometer with a practical range of 0 ºF to 220 ºF. - Wash, rinse, and sanitize a dial face, metal probe type thermometer with an alcohol wipe. - Insert the thermometer into the center of the product. - Allow time for stabilization. Wait until there is no…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0580 — failed to tell family and doctor about changes — isolated
    Immediately tell the resident, the resident's doctor, and a family member of situations (injury/decline/room, etc.) that affect the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the legal guardian of one discharged resident (Resident #6), in a timely manner (usually within 24 hours) after the resident passed away. The facility also failed to notify the facility's Business Office Manager (BOM) in a timely manner, which caused the business office to cash a check sent by the legal guardian's office to the facility, 14 days after the resident passed away out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 143 residents. On 5/21/25 the Administrator were notified of the past noncompliance that occurred on 3/26/25. All staff were educated on the notification policy. The deficiency was corrected on 4/22/25. Review of the Facility's policy entitled Change of Condition Notification revised 6/20, showed: -Purpose: To ensure residents, family, legal representatives, and physicians are informed of changes in the residents' condition in a timely manner. -Definition: An Acute Change of Condition (ACOC) is a sudden, clinically…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — isolated
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Review of Resident #5's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes, heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure and asthma. Review of the resident's admission MDS dated [DATE], showed the resident: -Was alert with significant confusion. -Needed substantial assistance with transfers, mobility, bathing and dressing. Review of the resident's Care Plan updated 2/13/25, showed the resident had impaired cognitive functioning, vision loss, was at risk for falls, was incontinent and had a self care deficit. Interventions showed the resident was dependent on staff for bathing and staff was to provide maximum assistance to the resident. Review of the resident's bathing sheets from 3/24/25 to 5/8/25, showed the resident received bathing on the following dates: -March-3/24/25 -April-4/2/25, 4/11/25, 4/18/25, 4/25/25 -May-5/1/25, 5/8/25 -Bathing for the resident was once per week. Review of the resident's Medical Record showed there was no documentation showing the resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #17) was supervised during smoking times. On 5/15/25 the resident was outside on the smoking patio when the wind came up and the resident's hair caught fire. Hospitality Aide B failed to report the smoking incident which resulted in a delayed burn treatment for the resident. The facility further failed to ensure resident electronic smoking materials were stored safely and not used in the facility for one sampled resident (Resident #9) who had a Electronic-cigarettes (also known as e-cigarettes/vape pen are battery-operated devices that heat a liquid and produce an aerosol) found in the resident bed, and also observed on bedside table, out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 143 residents. Review of the Facility's Smoking by Resident Policy revised on 6/2020 showed: -This policy applies to the use of both cigarettes and e-cigarettes. -Smoking is not allowed anywhere inside the facility.…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-05-21 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to offer substitutes and honor preferences for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 143 residents. Review of the facility's policy, Resident Preference Interview, revised December 2020 showed: -Resident preferences will be reflected on the tray card and updated in a timely manner. --If a preferred item is not available, a suitable substitute should be provided. 1. Review of Resident #2's admission record showed he/she was admitted [DATE] with diagnoses to include: -Congestive heart failure (disorder that impairs the ability of the heart to fill with or pump a sufficient amount of blood throughout the body) - Diabetes Mellitus (a complex disorder of carbohydrate, fat, and protein metabolism that is primarily a result of a deficiency or complete lack of insulin secretion in the pancreas or resistance to insulin) -Anxiety Disorder (a psychiatric disorder causing feelings of persistent anxiety)…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2025-05-21 · tag F0809 — failed to serve meals on a reasonable schedule — isolated
    Ensure meals and snacks are served at times in accordance with resident’s needs, preferences, and requests. Suitable and nourishing alternative meals and snacks must be provided for residents who want to eat at non-traditional times or outside of scheduled meal times.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure snacks were being offered on the long term care unit consistently between meal times during the day and evening for two sampled residents (Resident #11 and #13) out of 19 sampled residents. The facility census was 143 residents. Record review of the facility snack schedule showed facility snacks were supposed to be at 10:00 A.M., 2:00 P.M., and 7:00 P.M. daily. 1. Review of Resident #11's Face Sheet showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses including diabetes, high cholesterol, high blood pressure and cancer. Review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool to be completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 4/11/25, showed the resident: -Was alert and oriented with no confusion. -Ambulated with a walker and was able to eat with supervision only. Observation and interview on 5/14/25 at 1:15 P.M., showed the resident was ambulatory in his/her room but also used a…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    Refer to F550 Event ID ZSB9 Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one sampled resident (Resident #104) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 158 residents.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2025-01-16 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — the official record, unedited, may be distressing

    See F 804 Event ID ZSB9 This deficiency is uncorrected. For previous examples, refer to the Statement of Deficiency dated 11/25/24. Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hot foods on room trays were served at or close to 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit), on 1/15/25 during lunch and on 1/16/25 during breakfast. This practice potentially affected at least 60 residents who resided on the 100, 200, 300 and 400 Halls. The facility census was 158 residents.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
Show the remaining 70 citations
  • Potential for harm · F2024-11-25 · tag F0880 — failed to prevent and control infections — widespread
    Provide and implement an infection prevention and control program.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 5. Review of the undated policy Understanding Enhanced Barrier Precautions showed: -When using PPE staff members wear a clean gown and gloves while performing high contact resident care activities with residents who are at increased risk of carrying a resistant organism. This includes all residents with any of the following: --Known infection or colonization with a resistant organism when Contact Precautions do not otherwise apply. --Wounds or indwelling medical devices like central line, urinary catheters, feeding tube, tracheostomy, or ventilator. -High contact resident care activities were typically bundled care activities that were provided either during the morning or evening care to include: --Dressing. --Bathing/showering. --Changing linens. --Changing briefs or assisting with toileting. --Caring for or using an indwelling medical device like central venous catheter, urinary catheter, feeding tube care, tracheostomy, or ventilator care. --Performing wound care. -Unlike Contact Precaution which are used by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure suction and oxygen equipment were kept covered to prevent cross contamination for one sampled resident (Resident #95) who had a tracheostomy (a surgically created hole, also called a stoma, in your windpipe, also known as your trachea. This hole allows air to pass into your windpipe); failed to ensure oxygen face masks and nasal cannulas (a medical device that provides supplemental oxygen to patients through two prongs that sit inside the nostrils) were covered for two sampled resident (Resident #126 and Resident #19) who had respiratory concerns; failed to ensure necessary respiratory care related to oxygen tubing and/or a bilevel positive airway pressure (BiPAP a non-invasive ventilation with two pressures settings, one for inhalation and one for exhalation, to assist with breathing) tubing, and mask bagged when not in use and the concentrators external filters to be free of buildup of dust for two residents (Resident #14 and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate storage and labeling of medications throughout the facility's medication carts and medication storage rooms. This deficient practice had the potential to affect all residents within the facility. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Storage of Medications dated August 2020 showed: -Nurses were not to transfer medications from one container to another or return partially used medication to the original container. -All medications dispensed by the pharmacy were to be stored in the pharmacy container with the pharmacy label. -Outdated, contaminated, or deteriorated medications and those in containers that were cracked, soiled, or without secure closures were to be immediately removed from inventory, disposed of according to procedures for medication disposal, and reordered from the pharmacy if a current order existed. -Expirations dates (beyond-use dates) of dispensed medications should be determined by the pharmacist at the time of dispensing. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2024-11-25 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were provided food that was at a safe and appetizing temperature for three sampled residents (Residents #109, #91 and #139) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's Food Temperature policy, dated December 2020, showed: -The purpose of the policy was to prove the nutrition services department with guidelines for food preparation and service temperatures. -Food prepared and served in the facility would be served at proper temperatures to ensure food safety. -Acceptable serving temperatures were: Above or equal to 135-degree Fahrenheit (F) for; eggs, vegetables, potatoes, pasta, meats, casseroles, and entrees. -If temperatures do not meet applicable serving temperatures, reheat the product to a temperature of 164-degree F for hot foods for 15 seconds. -If temperatures are not acceptable levels and cannot be corrected in time for meal services, an appropriate substitution…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the dignity of one sampled resident (Resident #104) out of 20 sampled residents. The facility census was 158 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Privacy and Dignity dated June 2020 showed: -The facility promoted resident care in a manner and an environment that maintains or enhances dignity and respect, in full recognition of each resident's individuality. -The staff assisted with the residents in maintaining self-esteem and self-worth. -Staff were to treat residents with respect including respecting their social status, speaking respectfully, and listening carefully. -Staff were to focus on residents as individuals when they speak to them and address residents as individuals when providing care and services. 1. Review of Resident #104's admission Record showed he/she admitted to the facility with a diagnosis of legal blindness. Review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 12/16/24 showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0554 — isolated
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to obtain a physician order for self-administration of medication at bedside and failed to evaluate and document the ability to self-administer medication for one sampled (Resident #96) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's policy titled Self-Administration of Medication dated August 2020 showed: -If a resident desired to self-administer medications, an assessment was conducted by the interdisciplinary team of the resident's cognitive, physical, and visual ability to carry out this responsibility during the care planning process. -The results of the interdisciplinary team assessment of the resident skills and of the determination regarding bedside storage were recorded in the resident's medical record on the care plan. -If the resident demonstrated the ability to safely self-administer medications, a further assessment of the safety of bedside medication storage was conducted. 1. Review of Resident #96's admission Record showed he/she admitted to the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident and/or the resident's representative(s) of a transfer to a hospital, including the reasons for the transfer in writing for two sampled residents (Residents #137 and #109) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the Facility's Transfer and Discharge Policy revised 06/2020 showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure that residents are transferred and discharged from the facility in compliance with state and federal laws and to provide complete, safe, and appropriate discharge planning and necessary information to the continuing care provider. -The facility may use Notice of Transfer/Discharge or another comparable form to provide the resident or his/her personal representative with advanced notice of transfer or discharge. -When a resident is transferred/discharged , Social Services Staff include a copy of the written notice of transfer/discharge provided to the resident or his/her personal…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0625 — isolated
    Notify the resident or the resident’s representative in writing how long the nursing home will hold the resident’s bed in cases of transfer to a hospital or therapeutic leave.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide a bed hold notification to a resident and/or the resident's representative upon transfer or discharge for two sampled residents (Resident #137 and #109) out of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's Bed Hold Policy dated 6/2020 showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure that the resident and/or their representative was aware of the facility's bed hold policy, and that such policy complies with state and federal law and regulations. -When a resident was admitted to the facility, the facility informed the resident or his/her personal representative in writing that the facility had a bed hold policy. -The facility notified the resident or his/her representative, in writing, of the bed hold policy any time the resident was transferred to general acute care hospital even if the facility has not met the occupancy requirements. -Upon notice to the resident or his/her personal representative, the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the accuracy of the Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) for two sampled residents (Residents #14, #98) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. A policy was requested and not received from the facility. 1. Review of Resident #14's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the diagnosis of Need for Assistance with Personal Care. Review of the resident's nursing Admission/readmission Evaluation dated 8/24/23 showed he/she had broken and/or carious teeth. Review of the resident's Nutrition Assessment-Registered Dietician Evaluation dated 1/20/23 showed the resident has his/her own teeth in fair condition. Review of the resident's Order Summary Report (OSR) showed a physician's order dated 4/30/24 may be seen and treated by a dentist. Review of the resident's Annual MDS dated [DATE] showed: -He/She had…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person-centered care plan to address the residents' functional and health status, strengths and needs as related to dental services for two sampled residents, (Resident #14 and #98), failed to assess and care plan the usage of a Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP a non-invasive ventilation with two pressures settings, one for inhalation and one for exhalation, to assist with breathing) for one sampled resident, (Resident #98), and failed to assess and care plan two falls for one sampled resident (Resident #109) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility policy Care Planning revised June 2020 showed: -The purpose was to ensure the comprehensive person-centered care plan was developed for each resident based on individual assessed needs. -The Facility's Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) would develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident in…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — isolated
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to update the care plan for an anticoagulant medication (a blood thinning medication) for one sampled resident (Resident #110) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's Comprehensive Care Plans and Revisions policy dated 6/2020 showed: -The care plan was to be prepared by an Interdisciplinary Team (IDT) and Nursing Staff. -The Facility's IDT will develop a comprehensive care plan for each resident in accordance with OBRA and MDS guidelines. -A comprehensive person-centered Care Plan must be completed within 7 days after the Comprehensive admission Assessment and must be periodically reviewed and revised by a team of qualified persons after each assessment, including the comprehensive and quarterly review assessments. 1. Review of Resident #110's admission Record showed the resident was admitted on [DATE], with a diagnosis of Peripheral Vascular Disease (PVD, is a circulatory condition that occurs when…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0660 — isolated
    Plan the resident's discharge to meet the resident's goals and needs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to document discharge planning prior to the resident's discharge from the facility and failed to complete a discharge summary for one discharged resident (Resident #201) who was discharged to home out of four discharged records. The resident sample was 35. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's Discharge Planning policy and procedure dated 8/2020, showed: -Discharge Planning will start on the day the resident was admitted to the facility. -If the Interdisciplinary team and the attending physician determine that the resident may soon be discharged , Social Service staff will coordinate the discussion of discharge with the Interdisciplinary team, the resident, and the resident's representative. -Social Services staff will document the discharge planning, preparation, and the resident's post-discharge needs in the resident's electronic health record. -Social Services staff will assist in developing the Discharge Summary and Discharge…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0684 — failed to provide proper treatment and quality of care — isolated
    Provide appropriate treatment and care according to orders, resident’s preferences and goals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to obtain treatment and monitoring orders for a head laceration with staples for one sampled resident (Resident #45) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's Physician Orders policy revised on 6/2020 showed: -The facility will ensure physician orders are complete and accurate. -Medical records department will verify that physician order are complete, accurate and clarified as necessary. -Physician order will include a description complete enough to ensure clarity of the physician plan of care. 1. Review of Resident #45's admission Record showed was admitting on 8/5/24 with diagnosis include History of Falls, and Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of control of memory, judgment, and impulses). Review of the resident's Annual…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to supervise, assess, and investigate a burn related to smoking for one sampled resident (Resident #104) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's Incident Investigation policy revised in August 2020 showed: -The purpose was to ensure the facility tracked incidents that take place at the facility to increase the quality of care provided to residents. -The facility would have a licensed nurse fill out the Incident/Accident report as soon as possible. -An incident included but was not limited to the following: --Burns. -In the event of an incident a licensed nurse or the individual who first encountered or witnessed an incident would complete the Incident/Accident report. -As appropriate, interviews with staff members and other witnesses would be documented. -The Director of Nursing (DON) and/or designee, would review the information and Incident log every month. -The Director of Nursing and/or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure to obtain comprehensive physician order for a Suprapubic (S/P) catheter (a urinary bladder catheter inserted through the skin about one inch above the symphysis pubis) include type, size and care required and failed to ensure plan of care updated with the new Suprapubic catheter care and care of the stoma site for one sampled resident (Resident #15) out of 35 sampled resident. The facility census of 151 resident. Review of the facility policy Physician Orders dated 6/2020, showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure that all physician orders are completed and accurate. -Documentation pertaining to physician's orders will be maintained in the resident's medical record. -The licensed nurse receiving the physicians order will be responsible for documenting and implementing the order. 1. Review of Resident #15's admission Record showed the resident was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Benign Prostatic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure accurate documentation of refusal of enteral feeding via a Gastrostomy Tube also known as a feeding tube-surgical creation of a permanent opening into the stomach through the skin for the introduction of nourishment and fluids through a tube for one sampled resident (Resident #116) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility policy Physician Orders dated 6/2020, showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure that all physician orders are completed and accurate. -Documentation pertaining to physician's orders will be maintained in the resident's medical record. -The licensed nurse receiving the physicians order will be responsible for documenting and implementing the order. A policy for enteral tube feeding was requested but not provided by the facility. 1. Review of Resident #116's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-11-25 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for assessing the resident's Dialysis (a procedure that removes waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys are unable to function properly) shunt (a surgically created connection between an artery and a vein that allows for direct access to the bloodstream for Dialysis) consistently, and failed to ensure Dialysis communication was received and documented after each Dialysis treatment for continuum of care, for two sampled residents (Resident #7 and #97) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's Dialysis Care policy dated June 2020, showed: -The policy is to provide care for residents diagnosed with renal disease requiring ongoing dialysis treatments. -The facility would be responsible for the overall care delivered to the resident, monitoring of the resident prior to and after the completion of each Dialysis treatment, providing for all…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0758 — failed to limit and justify psychotropic drugs — isolated
    Implement gradual dose reductions(GDR) and non-pharmacological interventions, unless contraindicated, prior to initiating or instead of continuing psychotropic medication; and PRN orders for psychotropic medications are only used when the medication is necessary and PRN use is limited.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure the resident's physician responded with a rationale to the pharmacist's recommendation for a Gradual Dose Reduction (GDR) of the resident's psychotropic medications (drugs which affect psychic function, behavior, or experience) on the Drug Regimen Review (DRR) for one sampled resident (Resident #137) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facilities Medication Management policy dated August 2020, showed: -In order to optimize the therapeutic benefit of medication therapy and minimize or prevent potential adverse consequences, facility, the attending physician/prescriber, and the consultant pharmacist perform on going monitoring for appropriate, effective, and safe medication use. -When selecting medications and non-pharmacological interventions, members of the interdisciplinary team participate in the care process to identify, assess, address, advocate, for, monitor, and communicate the resident's needs…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0759 — failed to keep medication error rate low — isolated
    Ensure medication error rates are not 5 percent or greater.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure a medication error rate under five percent for one sampled resident (Resident #96). The medication error rate was eight percent. The facility census was 151 residents. 1. Review of Resident #96's face sheet showed he/she admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD-a disease process that decreases the ability of the lungs to perform ventilation). -Pulmonary Fibrosis (a diseases in which the lungs become scarred over time). Review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS- federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 10/16/24 showed the resident was cognitively intact. Review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated November 2024 showed an order for Symbicort (a medication used to treat COPD) Inhalation Aerosol 160-4.5 micrograms (mcg)/actuation (act), two puffs inhale orally two times a day for COPD. Observation on 11/18/24 at 9:36 A.M. of medication administration completed by…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0760 — failed to prevent significant medication errors — isolated
    Ensure that residents are free from significant medication errors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure residents were free from significant medication errors when staff administered the incorrect insulin (a synthetic hormone used to lower blood glucose levels) for one sampled resident (Resident #120) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's Insulin Administration policy dated September 2014 showed: -The type of insulin should have been verified prior to administration to ensure it corresponded with the physician's order. -The nurse was to notify the Director of Nursing (DON) or physician of any discrepancies. 1. Review of Resident #120's Annual Minimum Data Set (MDS, a federally mandated assessment tool completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 9/20/24 showed the resident had a diagnosis of Type II Diabetes Mellitus (a condition in which the body is unable to use insulin appropriately). Review of the resident's Physician Order Summary (POS), dated 11/19/24, showed an order for Fiasp (Insulin Aspart with Niacinamide) 17 units subcutaneously…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0791 — failed to provide routine dental services — isolated
    Provide or obtain dental services for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure routine and emergency dental services to meet the needs of residents were offered to two sampled residents, (Residents #14 and #98) out of 35 sampled residents. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of the facility's undated Dental Services policy showed: -Refer and/or assist residents to obtain dental services as indicated for routine and emergency dental care including making appointments for the residents, if needed or requested and arrange transportation to and from the dentist's office. --Routine services include but are not limited to: ---Annual inspections. ---Dental cleaning, fillings, and x-ray as needed. ---Minor dental plate adjustments. ---Smoothing of broken teeth. --Emergency dental services include but are not limited to: ---Acute or intolerable pain in teeth, gums, palate. ---Broken, damaged teeth, or dentures. 1. Review of Resident #14's admission Record showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0883 — failed to offer flu and pneumonia vaccines — isolated
    Develop and implement policies and procedures for flu and pneumonia vaccinations.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure pneumococcal pneumonia vaccines (a vaccine to protect against pneumococcal disease caused by the bacteria Streptococcus pneumoniae) were offered, administered, or documented for one sampled resident (Resident #95) and failed to ensure an influenza vaccine (an annual vaccine to protect against the influenza virus) was offered, administered, or documented for one sampled resident (Resident #48) out of five residents sampled for vaccination provision. The facility census was 151 residents. Review of a facility policy titled Pneumococcal Disease Prevention, dated June 2020 showed: -Residents that reside in nursing homes are recommended to have the pneumococcal vaccine. -Residents would be assessed for and offered pneumococcal vaccinations. -Any vaccine refusals or administrations would be documented in the residents' medical record. -Any consent or refusal would be documented in the resident record. Review of an undated facility policy titled…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2024-11-25 · tag F0887 — isolated
    Educate residents and staff on COVID-19 vaccination, offer the COVID-19 vaccine to eligible residents and staff after education, and properly document each resident and staff member's vaccination status.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide education to the resident or the resident's representative and obtain signed consent or refusal of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19), and failed to administer recommended vaccines for three sampled residents (Residents #71, #93 and #95) out of five sampled residents. The facility census was 139 residents. Review of the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) Clinical Considerations for COVID-19 Vaccines, dated 10/31/24, showed: -Unvaccinated residents (residents who did not receive a multidose vaccine series) should receive a two dose vaccine series. -The Moderna COVID-19 vaccine is a two-dose initial vaccine series with recommended boosters thereafter. 1. Review of Resident #71's medical record showed: -An admission date of 2/12/24. -A single dose of Moderna COVID-19 vaccine administered 10/27/23. -No other COVID-19 vaccine doses. -No evidence of a COVID-19 vaccine being offered or administered by the facility. -No signed consent or refusal for the COVID-19 vaccine. -No evidence of COVID-19 vaccine education…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Infection Control Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2024-10-16 · tag F0602 — failed to protect residents from theft of their belongings — pattern
    Protect each resident from the wrongful use of the resident's belongings or money.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident's (Resident #1) narcotics were secure when 47 pills of Oxycodone (a narcotic pain medication) were noted as missing on 9/11/24 out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 159 residents. On 10/16/24 the administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 9/11/24. On 9/11/24 the Administrator was notified of missing Oxycodone from the licensed nursing cart. The staff was educated on narcotic count and handling, and changed the policy for removing empty cards from all narcotic lock boxes on 9/11/24. The deficiency was found to be corrected on 9/11/24. Review of the facility's Storage of Controlled Substances Policy dated 8/2020 showed: -Medications classified by the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) as controlled substances are subject to special handling, storage, disposal, and record keeping in the facility in accordance with federal, state, and other applicable laws and regulations. -The Director of Nursing (DON), in collaboration with the consultant pharmacist,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-06-28 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility staff failed to provide an appropriate immediate discharge letter for one sampled resident (Resident #5) out of nine sampled residents. The facility census was 160 residents. Record review of the facility's policy for Transfer and Discharge revised 10/24/22 showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure that residents were transferred and discharged from the facility in compliance with state and federal laws and to provide complete, safe, and appropriate discharge planning and necessary information to the continuing care provider. -In a situation where the facility initiated a discharge while the resident was in the hospital following an emergency transfer, the facility must have had evidence that the resident's status at the time the resident sought to return to the facility (not at the time the resident was transferred for acute care) met one of the criteria for discharge outline in the policy. -The resident had the right to return to the facility pending an…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2024-02-01 · tag F0550 — failed to protect resident dignity and rights — isolated
    Honor the resident's right to a dignified existence, self-determination, communication, and to exercise his or her rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one of six sampled residents (Resident #1) received timely assistance in obtaining a hearing device for communication. The facility census was 154 residents. Review of Resident #1's admission Record showed: -Was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnosis; -Cognitive Communication Deficit (having trouble reasoning and making decisions while communicating, remembering their conversations and experiences and trouble responding in an appropriate or socially acceptable manner). Review of the resident's Care Plan, revised on 3/24/23, showed: -Focus: --Had a communication problem related to hearing deficit. -Goal: --Will be able to make basic needs known on a daily basis through the review date of 12/6/23. -Interventions: --Anticipate and meet needs. --Allow adequate time to respond, repeat as necessary, do not rush, and request clarification from the resident to ensure understanding. --Face when speaking, make eye contact, turn…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0623 — isolated
    Provide timely notification to the resident, and if applicable to the resident representative and ombudsman, before transfer or discharge, including appeal rights.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide appropriate discharge notice for one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of four sampled residents. The facility census was 148 residents. Review of the facility policy titled, Transfer and Discharge, dated 6/2020, showed: -To ensure that residents are transferred and discharged from the facility in compliance with state and federal laws and to provide complete, safe, and appropriate discharge planning and necessary information to the continuing care provider. -Prior to transfer/discharge, social services staff or designee will provide the resident or responsible party with reasonable notice that the resident is going to be transferred or discharged . -Social Service staff or designee will provide the resident or responsible party with Notice of Proposed Discharge letter. -If the resident is transferred because his/her needs cannot be met, the facility must document attempts to meet the resident's needs and the service available at the receiving facility to meet the need(s). -The medical record will contain written…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-09-07 · tag F0626 — isolated
    Permit a resident to return to the nursing home after hospitalization or therapeutic leave that exceeds bed-hold policy.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to allow one sampled resident (Resident #2) out of four sampled residents, to return to the facility after a hospitalization. The facility census was 148 residents. Review of the facility policy titled, Transfer and Discharge, dated 6/2020, showed: -To ensure that residents are transferred and discharged from the facility in compliance with state and federal laws and to provide complete, safe, and appropriate discharge planning and necessary information to the continuing care provider. -Prior to transfer/discharge, social services staff or designee will provide the resident or responsible party with reasonable notice that the resident is going to be transferred or discharged . -If the resident is transferred because his/her needs cannot be met, the facility must document attempts to meet the resident's needs and the service available at the receiving facility to meet the need(s). -The medical record will contain written documentation from a physician if…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-09-07 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — isolated
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain the memory care unit doors to properly close allowing unauthorized exit by residents. On 8/7/23, one sampled resident (Resident #2), wandered from the secured unit and was found .3 mile from the facility after the magnetic door lock failed to securely lock out of three sampled residents. The facility census was 148 residents. On 8/11/23, the Administrator was notified of the past noncompliance which occurred on 8/7/23. The facility administration was notified on the same day of the incident and the investigation was started. Facility staff were educated on the facility Wandering and Elopement policy, resident interventions and behaviors before the start of the next shift. Resident care plans were updated. The magnetic locks were fixed and self closing hinges for the door were installed. The deficiency was corrected on 8/8/23. Review of the facility policy titled Wandering and Elopement, dated 8/2020, showed: -The facility would identify residents at risk for elopement and minimize any possible injury as a result…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Past Non-Compliance
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-29 · tag F0725 — failed to have enough nursing staff — widespread
    Provide enough nursing staff every day to meet the needs of every resident; and have a licensed nurse in charge on each shift.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have sufficient staffing on a 24-hour basis to care for resident's needs and to ensure resident safety by not having adequate staff in the building for all shifts. This practice had the potential to effect all residents. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the facility's Nursing Department - Staffing, Scheduling and Postings policy, dated June 2020, showed: -The purpose was to ensure an adequate number of nursing personnel were available to meet resident needs. -The facility employed sufficient nursing staff on a 24 hour basis. -Schedule was done as needed to meet resident needs and accounted for the number, acuity and diagnoses the of the facility's resident populations. -The facility utilized the Facility Assessment to identify competency needs of the nursing staff. -The facility submitted complete and accurate staffing information, including information for agency and contract staff, based on payroll and other verifiable and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — widespread
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain the fan vent covers and the light fixture of the walk-in refrigerator free of a heavy dust buildup; maintain the ceiling and the light fixtures in the kitchen free of a heavy dust buildup; maintain the ice machine free of brown colored grime; maintain the floor of the dry goods storage room free of food crumbs; maintain the nozzles of the automated dish washer spray wands free of debris inside the nozzles and free from a layer of grime on the upper part of the dishwasher; ensure the handle of the spatula was easily cleanable; ensure the mittens were free from rips and loose fibers that could potentially get into foods; and maintain the snack food refrigerator on the Sunset Unit in a clean manner and without expired containers of condiments. This practice potentially affected 144 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 148 residents. 1. Observations during the lunch meal preparation on 3/20/23 from 9:31 A.M. through 2:07 P.M., showed: - The presence of dust on the fan vent covers and the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · F2023-03-29 · tag F0867 — failed to act on quality-improvement findings — widespread
    Set up an ongoing quality assessment and assurance group to review quality deficiencies and develop corrective plans of action.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure they developed and implemented a Quality Assurance and Performance Improvement (QAPI) Plan pertaining to on-going systemic issues regarding one resident (Resident #60) out of 30 sampled residents not receiving showers on a regular basis; and to implement a QAPI program to ensure safe smoking practices by staff and residents. The facility census was 148 residents. 1. Record review of the QAPI meeting minutes dated 1/3/23, showed the absence of any discussion of any matters related to enhancing the shower experience for residents or the promotion of safe smoking practices for facility staff and residents. During a phone interview on 4/5/23 at 2:34 P.M., the Director of Nursing (DON) said he/she did not remember attending that QAPI meeting back in January 2023 and there was a different Administrator there at that time. 2. Record review of Resident #60's admission Sheet showed he/she had diagnoses of muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and pain. Record review of the resident's care plan dated 8/9/22…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Administration Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Fcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — widespread
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to repair two convection ovens (an oven that has fans to circulate air around food to create an evenly heated environment which causes a fan-assisted oven to cook food faster) and one regular oven for an unknown period of time. The facility census was 148 residents. 1. During an interview on 3/20/23 at 9:51 A.M. Dietary [NAME] (DC) A said Convection Oven #1 (the upper oven) convection ovens did not work at all and the Convection Oven #2 (the lower oven) only cooked at one temperature, and one of the regular ovens did not turn on at all. Observation on 3/20/23 at 10:10 A.M., showed DC A placed two trays of pork cutlets into Convection Oven #2. During an interview on 3/20/23 at 2:03 P.M., the Dietary Manager said: - The top convection oven has not been working for about six months to a year. - He/she was not sure how long the regular oven has not been working. - The lower convection overcooks the meat at times. - At that time, he/she did not have any way of documenting how often he/she notified the maintenance department. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-29 · tag F0554 — pattern
    Allow residents to self-administer drugs if determined clinically appropriate.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to provide oversight for three sampled residents, who did not have orders for self-administration of medications (Resident #23, Resident #24 and Resident #96), when staff left the residents medications at the bedside, left the room, and did not watch to ensure the residents took their medications out of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the facility's undated policy Medication Administration, showed: -Medication would be administer by a licensed nurse per the order of an attending physician or licensed practitioner. -Medications would not be left at bedside. -The licensed nurse would remain with the resident until the medication was actually swallowed. -When an as needed medication was given, it would be documented on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). 1. Record review of Resident #23's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Metabolic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-29 · tag F0584 — failed to keep a safe, clean, comfortable home — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to a safe, clean, comfortable and homelike environment, including but not limited to receiving treatment and supports for daily living safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to maintain oscillating fans in resident use areas (the Sunset nurse's station the 300 Hall shower room) free from a buildup of dust, and to maintain the sprinkler heads and the ceiling vent in the Main Dining room (MDR) free from a buildup of dust. This practice potentially affected at least 50 residents who used or resided in those areas of the facility. The facility census was 148 residents. 1. Observations with the Maintenance Director on 3/22/23 at 10:02 P.M., showed a heavy buildup of dust on the fan at the Sunset Nurse's Station. 2. Observations with the Maintenance Director on 3/24/23, showed: - At 12:34 P.M., a buildup of dust on the sprinkler heads in the MDR. - At 12:36 P.M., a buildup of dust on a ceiling vent in the MDR. During an interview on 3/24/23 at 12:37 P.M., the Maintenance Director said he/she needed to to clean those sprinkler heads because they have not been cleaned in a long time. 3. Observation with the Maintenance Director on…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-29 · tag F0657 — failed to keep the care plan current — pattern
    Develop the complete care plan within 7 days of the comprehensive assessment; and prepared, reviewed, and revised by a team of health professionals.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to reassess the effectiveness of individualized resident care and interventions by not reviewing and revising resident care plans (a document that specified health care and support needs and outlined how the facility met resident requirements) for six sampled residents (Resident #58, #105, #31, #126, #95 and #88) out of 30 sampled residents. This practice had the potential to effect reach resident's physical and mental well-being. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the facility's Care Planning policy, dated 10/24/2022, showed: -The purpose of the policy was to ensure a comprehensive person-centered Care Plan was developed for each resident based on their individual assessed needs. -A Licensed Practical Nurse (LPN) initiated and finalized the Care Plan. -The Care Plan was updated as indicated for change of condition, on-set of new problems, resolution of current problems and as deemed appropriate by clinical assessment. -The…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-29 · tag F0658 — failed to meet professional standards of care — pattern
    Ensure services provided by the nursing facility meet professional standards of quality.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to notify the resident's physician when the resident's blood sugar was outside prescribed parameters for two sampled residents (Resident #23 and Resident #119) out of 30 sampled residents; and to ensure proper hand hygiene was completed during medication passes for one sampled resident (Resident #104) and for one supplemental resident (Resident #86) out of 30 sampled residents and eight supplemental residents. The facility census was 148 residents. A policy for physician notification was requested and not received at the time of exit. Record review of the facility's undated policy, Medication - Administration showed: -When administration of the drug is dependent upon vital signs or testing, the vital signs/testing would be completed prior to administration of the medication and recorded in the medical record; example finger stick blood glucose monitoring. -The resident's Medication Administration Record (MAR) would be reviewed for special consideration…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-29 · tag F0676 — failed to keep up residents' daily-living abilities — pattern
    Ensure residents do not lose the ability to perform activities of daily living unless there is a medical reason.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure physician's orders for restorative assist care (RA) were initiated timely and followed for three sampled residents (Resident #36, #23, and #88) out of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the facility Restorative Nursing Program Guidelines, revised June 2020, showed: -The Restorative Nursing Program provides nursing interventions that promote the resident's ability to adapt and adjust to live as independently and safely as possible. This program actively focuses on achieving and maintaining optimal physical, mental, and psychosocial functioning. -A resident may be started on a Restorative Nursing Program: --Upon admission to the facility with restorative needs but is not a candidate for formalized rehabilitive therapy. --When restorative needs arise during a longer-term stay. --In conjunction with formalized rehabilitive therapy. --When a resident is discharged from a formalized physical,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-29 · tag F0677 — failed to help fully-dependent residents with daily care — pattern
    Provide care and assistance to perform activities of daily living for any resident who is unable.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure bathing/showers were completed at least once weekly and at the resident's preference for five sampled residents (Resident #60, #153, #8, #67 and #96) out of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the facility's undated policy titled Showering A Resident showed a shower bath is given to residents to provide cleanliness, comfort and to prevent body odors. Residents are offered a shower or bath at at a minimum of once weekly and given per resident request. 1. Record review of Resident #60's admission Sheet showed he/she had diagnoses of muscle weakness, unsteadiness on feet and pain. Record review of the resident's care plan dated 8/9/22 showed: -He/she had Activities of Daily Living (ADL's) self-care performance deficit related to pain, unsteady gait and balance, poor vision, -His/her goal was to maintain current level of function in ADL. -He/she was independent with transfers. Requires assistant…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-29 · tag F0689 — failed to keep residents free of avoidable accidents; supervise adequately — pattern
    Ensure that a nursing home area is free from accident hazards and provides adequate supervision to prevent accidents.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review the facility failed to ensure residents were free from harm while outside smoking resulting in one sampled resident (Resident #63) who was visually impaired, while lighting his/her cigarette pulling his/her hand away and shaking it suddenly and saying ah when his/her finger was burned by the flame; the facility failed to maintain hot water temperatures on the Renew Unit below 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) from 2/24/23 through 3/29/23, potentially affecting 19 residents who resided in resident rooms 520, 519, 518, 517, 516, 515, 514, 513, 512, 511, 509, 503, and 501; failed to ensure the hot water situation was addressed until 3/29/23, resulting in one cognitively impaired supplemental resident (Resident ##115) indicating the water was too hot for him/her when he/she washed his/her hands. The facility failed to complete and document a fall investigation, failed to complete and document neurochecks (neurological checkpoints to monitor: level of consciousness,…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-29 · tag F0695 — failed to provide proper breathing / tracheostomy care — pattern
    Provide safe and appropriate respiratory care for a resident when needed.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY 2. Record review of Resident #96's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including respiratory failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD- a progressive disease that is characterized by shortness of breath and difficulty breathing), obesity, heart failure, pain, anxiety disorder, depression, iron deficiency and sleep apnea (a common disorder in which you have one or more pauses in breathing or shallow breaths while you sleep). Record review of the resident's admission MDS dated [DATE], showed the resident: -Was alert oriented and cognitively intact. -Had no behaviors and was not resistive to cares. -Needed extensive assistance of one person with bed mobility, transfers, bathing, dressing, toileting and did not walk. -Had not had any falls prior to admission or since admission. -Had shortness of breath and received oxygen therapy. Record review of the resident's POS dated 3/2023, showed physician's orders for: -Oxygen at 5 liters per minute via nasal cannula continuously or as…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-29 · tag F0697 — failed to manage pain — pattern
    Provide safe, appropriate pain management for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility to ensure pain medication was ordered, obtained and provided in a timely manner for one sampled resident with chronic pain (Resident # 36); and did not provide adequate pain relief for three sampled residents (Resident #24, Resident #37, and Resident #119) out of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Pain Management, dated 6/2020 showed: -The Licensed Nurse would administer pain medication as ordered and document medication administered on the Medication Administration Record (MAR). -The Licensed Nurse would assess the resident for pain and document results on the MAR each shift using the 1-10 pain scale. -The shift pain score would indicate the highest pain level that occurred on that shift. 1. Record review of Resident #36's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE], with diagnoses including respiratory failure, sleep apnea (a condition where breathing stops and…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-29 · tag F0755 — failed to provide safe pharmacy services — pattern
    Provide pharmaceutical services to meet the needs of each resident and employ or obtain the services of a licensed pharmacist.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure proper documentation was completed for the shift change narcotic count books and the individual narcotic count sheets for two sampled residents (Resident #51 and Resident #119) and one supplemental resident (Resident #11) out of 30 sampled residents and nine supplemental residents. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Controlled Substance Administration and Accountability dated October 2022 showed: -All controlled substances obtained from a non-automated medication cart or cabinet are recorded on the designated usage form. -Written documentation must be clearly legible with all applicable information provided. -All specially compounded or non-stock Schedule II controlled substances (drugs with a high potential for abuse, with use potentially leading to severe psychological or physical dependence) dispensed from the pharmacy for a specific patient are recorded on he Controlled Drug Record supplied with the medication or other designated form as per…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-29 · tag F0761 — failed to label and store drugs safely — pattern
    Ensure drugs and biologicals used in the facility are labeled in accordance with currently accepted professional principles; and all drugs and biologicals must be stored in locked compartments, separately locked, compartments for controlled drugs.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure resident's medication that had been prescribed by a physician were dated when they were opened and to ensure staff's personal items were not in the same drawer with resident's medications, out of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 56 residents. Record review of the facility's policy, Storage of Medications, dated 9/2018 showed: -Medications and biologicals were stored safely, securely, and properly. -Outdated, medications were immediately removed from inventory. -Medication storage areas were kept clean, and free of clutter. 1. Observation on 3/24/23 at 7:30 A.M. of the medication cart on 100 hallway with Certified Medication Technician (CMT) B showed: -A resident's medication (prescribed by a physician) Levetiracetam (a medication used to control seizures) a 300 milliliter (ml) bottle was opened without the date it had been opened written on it. -A resident's medication (prescribed by a physician) Miralax (a medication used to pass a bowel movement) a 17.9 gram bottle was opened without the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-29 · tag F0803 — failed to meet residents' dietary needs — pattern
    Ensure menus must meet the nutritional needs of residents, be prepared in advance, be followed, be updated, be reviewed by dietician, and meet the needs of the resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to follow the menus by cooking meals according to the menu; to ensure recipes were available for breakfast meals, and to document meal substitutions in the substitution log book for the Registered Dietitian (RD) to sign off on when the RD's came to the facility for their consults. This practice potentially affected 145 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 148 residents. 1. Record review of the menu for the breakfast meal on 3/24/23, showed the residents were supposed to receive the following: Vitamin C juice, choice of cold or hot cereal, assorted fresh fruit, western egg bake, blueberry muffin and whole milk. Observation on 3/24/23 at 7:05 A.M., showed the absence of western egg bake form the steam table. During an interview on 3/24/23 at 7:07 A.M., Dietary [NAME] (DC) C said they did not prepare the western egg bake according to the menu on that day because the residents did not like it. Observation on 3/24/23 at 7:11 A.M., showed DC B made pancakes which were not on the menu for…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2023-03-29 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed to assess the dietary preferences of four sampled residents (Residents #24, #96, #73, and #88) out of 30 sampled residents and one supplemental Resident (Resident #78), by not doing a dietary profile and to ensure food substitutes which were consistent with ordinary food items which were provided by the facility, were available for residents who did not prefer to eat the items which were offered. This practice potentially affected 144 residents who ate food from the kitchen. The facility census was 148 residents. 1. Record review of the resident council minutes dated 12/16/22, showed the residents stated that alternates were not available on weekend meals. Record review of the Resident Council Concern Response form dated 1/1/23 showed the following statement has active response and did not give back. 2. Record review of Resident #24's face sheet showed diagnoses which included: -Hypertensive heart disease (changes in the left ventricle, left…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2023-03-29 · tag F0947 — failed to train nurse aides adequately — pattern
    Ensure nurse aides have the skills they need to care for residents, and give nurse aides education in dementia care and abuse prevention.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to re-train Certified Nursing Assistants (CNA) by not providing a competency evaluation program for five out of five CNA's. This had the potential to affect all residents. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the facility's Care Standards Policy, dated June 2020, showed: -The purpose of this policy was to ensure all residents receive necessary care and services that are evident-based and in accordance with accepted professional clinical standards of practice. -The Director of Nursing (DON) ensured care and services were delivered according to accepted standards of clinical practice -The DON or designee evaluated staff competency in skills and techniques necessary to care for resident's assessed needs. -The DON ensured that permanent and non-permanent caregivers met competency knowledge and skill requirements to the same extent as permanent personnel. -The administrator, Health Information Management Coordinator or designee ensured that documentation of observations and evaluation of therapeutic…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nursing and Physician Services Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0558 — failed to accommodate residents' needs and preferences — isolated
    Reasonably accommodate the needs and preferences of each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to accommodate the eating and ambulation (walking) needs for one visually impaired sampled resident (Resident #104) out of 30 sampled residents and nine supplemental residents. The facility census was 148 residents. A policy regarding Care for the Visually Impaired was requested and not received at the time of exit. 1. Record review of Resident #104's undated face sheet showed he/she admitted to the facility with legal blindness. Record review of the resident's annual Minimum Data Set (MDS- a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 1/29/23 showed: -The resident was cognitively intact. -The resident's vision was severely impaired meaning the resident had no vision or saw only light, colors, or shapes and his/her eyes did not appear to track. Observation on 3/20/23 at 9:48 A.M. showed: -The resident was led down the hall by a resident (Resident #86). -Resident #86 was walking with his/her…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure infection control practices were maintained during the placement of indwelling Foley catheter (a urinary bladder catheter inserted through urethra) drainage bag (catheter bag, a bag that hold drained urine) during before and after care for one sampled resident (Resident #153) who was at risk for Urinary Tack Infections (UTI - an infection of one or more structures in the urinary system) out of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the Facility Catheter Care policy revised on 6/2020 showed: -Position the catheter drainage system and bag utilizing gravity to facilitate drainage of the urine. The collection bag (drainage bag) will be kept below the level of the bladder, including during transport and avoiding contact with the floor. -Facility staff were to ensure the collection bag does not touch the floor at any time. 1. Record review of Resident #153's admission Face sheet showed he/she had the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0693 — failed to provide proper feeding-tube care — isolated
    Ensure that feeding tubes are not used unless there is a medical reason and the resident agrees; and provide appropriate care for a resident with a feeding tube.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure the appropriate care was completed during enteral feeding (tube feeding- the delivery of nutrients through a feeding tube directly into the stomach, duodenum (first part of small intestine), or jejunum (middle part of the small intestine)) for one sampled resident (Resident #97) out of 30 sampled residents and nine supplemental residents. The facility census was 148 residents. A policy for tube feeding was requested and not received at the time of exit. 1. Record review of Resident #97's undated face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility with the following diagnoses: -Cerebral Infarction (stroke- a disruption of blood flow to the brain). -Unspecified Protein-Calorie Malnutrition (lack of proper nutrition). -Acute on Chronic Respiratory Failure (a short term condition turning into a long term condition in which the lungs cannot provide enough oxygen to the blood). Record review of the resident's Physician Order Sheet (POS) dated March 2023 showed: -Nothing by Mouth (NPO) indicating the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0698 — failed to provide proper dialysis care — isolated
    Provide safe, appropriate dialysis care/services for a resident who requires such services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to follow physician's orders for obtaining and recording weights and monitoring the fistula (a procedure that connects an artery to a vein that allows blood to pass freely) for one sampled resident (Resident #114) who received dialysis (procedure to remove waste products and excess fluid from the blood when the kidneys stop working properly) treatments out of 30 sampled residents. The facility census was 148 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #114's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE] with diagnoses including heart failure, diabetes, hepatitis (a disease that attacks the liver), human immunodeficiency virus (a virus that attacks the body's immune system) and end stage renal disease (ESRD- permanent kidney failure that requires a kidney transplant or scheduled dialysis). Record review of the resident's Care Plan dated 8/2022, showed the resident received dialysis on Tuesday, Thursday and Saturday at 11:00 A.M. It showed the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0756 — failed to review each resident's drug regimen — isolated
    Ensure a licensed pharmacist perform a monthly drug regimen review, including the medical chart, following irregularity reporting guidelines in developed policies and procedures.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide pharmacy medication regimen review (MRR) for 11 out of 12 months for one sampled resident (Resident #58) out of 30 sampled residents. This practice had the potential to effect each resident's physical and mental well-being. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the facility's Documentation and Communication of Consultant Pharmacist Recommendations, dated August 2020, showed: -The consultant pharmacist worked with the facility to establish a system where the consultant pharmacist observed and recommended medication therapies for residents. -Those recommendations were communicated to facility authority and responded to in a timely manner. -Records of the consultant pharmacist's observations and recommendations were made available to nurses, prescribers and the care planning team, which included: --Documentation of the date each MRR was completed and notated of findings. --Potential or actual medication-related problems, irregularities and other MRR findings appropriate for prescriber and/or nursing…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Pharmacy Service Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0790 — failed to provide dental care — isolated
    Provide routine and 24-hour emergency dental care for each resident.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, record review and interview, the facility failed provide dental services and complete comprehensive dental assessment for one sample resident (Resident #154) who had poor dental health and complaint of dental pain out of 30 sampled residents. The facility resident census was 148 residents. A policy related to dental/oral care was requested but not received at the time of exit. 1. Record review of Resident #154's admission Face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: -Abnormal weight loss -Severe protein-calorie malnutrition (is a deficiency of protein and overall energy intake) -He/she had Medicare and Medicaid for health insurance. Record review of resident's All-Inclusive admission with Baseline Care Plans dated 2/27/23 at 10:00 P.M. showed: -His/her teeth were not assessed. -He/she did not have dentures. -He/she was inadequate at brushing his/her teeth. -Had no indication of any dental needs. Record review of the resident's Physician…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2023-03-29 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — isolated
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to maintain hot foods on the room trays in the sunset location and the 300 Hall at or close to 120 ºF (degrees Fahrenheit) on different days of the survey and failed to have a system of monitoring the temperatures of room trays in place. This practice potentially affected an unknown number of residents who received their meals towards the end of the delivery for those respective locations within the facility. The facility census was 148 residents. 1. Record review of the resident council minutes dated 2/17/23 showed: -Weekend service for meals is terrible. -Corporate needs to be at the resident council meeting because food carts were sitting on the halls for so long that food was cold. The response dated 3/15/23 showed the dietary department took action to make the food more hot by making sure the plate warmers were on and that the steam tables were set to the correct temperature. 2. Observation during the lunch meal on 3/20/23 showed: -At 12:55 P.M., showed lunch arrived on the sunset unit and was put behind the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0813 — isolated
    Have a policy regarding use and storage of foods brought to residents by family and other visitors.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure all food items in the resident food refrigerator located on the Renew Unit, were labeled and dated. This practice potentially affected an unknown number of residents for whom food was stored in the refrigerator. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of The Visitor's Food Policy revised 2/2021, showed: - Purpose: To provide residents with the option of having food prepared by the resident's family brought into the facility. - Policy: Food may be brought to a resident by the family members, the resident's responsible party, or friends if the food is compatible with the Attending Physician's diet order. - Procedure: If the resident desires to have food brought in by visitors, the Food and Nutrition Services staff will review the resident's diet with the visitor, and provide education regarding the resident's diet orders and safe food handling practices. - Food from outside sources should be stored in a sealable container with the resident's name and date it was brought to the facility. -…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0814 — failed to dispose of garbage properly — isolated
    Dispose of garbage and refuse properly.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation and interview, the facility failed to ensure one trash container was inside the kitchen was kept closed while it was not in use and failed to ensure the outdoor dumpster was covered for several hours on 3/20/23, and to ensure that all facility staff were able to close the dumpster lid after dumping a bag of trash inside the outdoor dumpster. This practice affected the kitchen and one outdoor area. The facility census was 148 residents. 1. Observations on 3/20/23 at 8:42 A.M., 9:23 A.M. and 10:52 A.M., showed one trash container inside the kitchen, was left open throughout the lunch meal preparation and was not being used. 2. Observation on 3/20/23 at 9:39 A.M., 10:02 A.M., 11:16 A.M., and 2:13 P.M., showed the lids of the outdoor dumpster's were left open. During an interview on 3/20/23 at 2:14 P.M., the Dietary Manager (DM) said he/she expected dietary and all facility staff to close the dumpster lids after placing trash in the dumpster's. 3. Observation on 3/29/23 from 2:37 P.M., through 2:40 P.M., showed the following: - Certified Nurse's Assistant (CNA) J…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2023-03-29 · tag F0926 — failed to keep the home smoke-free / fire-safe — isolated
    Have policies on smoking.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #84) out of 30 sampled residents did not smoke cigarettes in his/her room. This practice potentially affected at least six residents who reside in adjoining rooms or rooms across the hall in the same area of the hall as that resident. The facility census was 148 residents. Record review of the facility's smoking policy revised in 3/2022, showed: - Smoking was not allowed anywhere inside the facility. - The facility discouraged smoking by residents and ensured that those residents who choose to smoke did so safely. - All smoking materials would be stored in a secure area to ensure they are kept safe. - Cigarette butts were disposed of only in provided receptacles. 1. Record review of Resident #84's Face sheet showed he/she was admitted on [DATE], with diagnoses which include: -Acute and chronic respiratory failure (a condition that occurs when the lungs cannot get enough oxygen into the blood or…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · E2020-03-09 · tag F0585 — failed to handle grievances — pattern
    Honor the resident's right to voice grievances without discrimination or reprisal and the facility must establish a grievance policy and make prompt efforts to resolve grievances.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to have grievance forms accessible for all residents, and educate residents and review the grievance policy and procedures on how to file a grievance, for 15 sampled residents (residents attending the Resident Council Group Interview Meeting, conducted as a part of the survey process). The facility census was 164 residents. 1. During Resident Council Interview on 3/3/20, beginning at 2:00 P.M., the group responses included: -Residents could not anonymously get a grievance form. -Residents were concerned about staff members knowing they were getting a grievance form. -Grievance forms were at the nurses' station and they are too high up for the residents to reach. -Residents did not know how to file a grievance. -Residents did not know if there was a grievance official. -Twelve of the fifteen residents present did not feel a resident or family group could complain about care without worrying that someone would get back at them. -Residents said retaliation included not getting ice water, not getting medication timely, not…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Rights Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-09 · tag F0804 — failed to serve food at safe, palatable temperature — pattern
    Ensure food and drink is palatable, attractive, and at a safe and appetizing temperature.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure hot foods on a room tray for one sampled resident (Resident #4) was maintained at or around 120 degrees Fahrenheit (ºF) at the time the food was delivered to his/her room and, failed to maintain food temperatures on the steam table at or close to 135 ºF during the entirety of the breakfast and noontime meals and. This practice of holding cooked food on a steam table with temperatures over 135 ºF overcooks the food items and lowers the nutrient levels, values and benefits of those food items, affecting all of the residents who receive hot meals from the facility's kitchen. These practices potentially affects all of the residents who receive their meals from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 164 residents. 1. Observations on 3/4/20 between 5:05 A.M. and 1:10 P.M. in the kitchen showed the following: -Breakfast room trays were being placed in an open, metal-framed service carts with a clear plastic coverings, holding approximately 12 to 16 room trays per cart. -At 7:25 A.M., the room trays…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-09 · tag F0806 — failed to honor food preferences — pattern
    Ensure each resident receives and the facility provides food that accommodates resident allergies, intolerances, and preferences, as well as appealing options.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure ample amounts of food on the regular menu was prepared to serve all residents, including sampled residents (Resident's #80 and #369), and to ensure regular food preference items were available at meal time for two sampled residents (Resident's #52 and #146) out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 164 residents. Record review of the facility's Dietary: Resident Preference Interview policy, revised February 2019, showed: -Staff would complete the dietary questionnaire upon admission, readmission and no less than annually to capture the resident's dietary preferences. -The tray card would reflect resident preferences. 1. Record review of Resident #80's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility 10/25/19. Record review of the resident's Quarterly Minimum Data Sheet (MDS - a federally mandated assessment instrument completed by facility staff for care planning) dated 1/19/20 showed. -The resident had a Brief…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-09 · tag F0812 — failed to store, cook, and serve food safely — pattern
    Procure food from sources approved or considered satisfactory and store, prepare, distribute and serve food in accordance with professional standards.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to properly store food in the refrigerated walk-in unit and to practice sanitary procedures before food preparation tasks. These practices potentially affects an unknown number of residents who received their meals from the facility's kitchen. The facility census was 164 residents. 1. Observations on 3/4/20 between 5:05 A.M. and 1:10 P.M. in the kitchen showed the following: -At 5:05 A.M. in the kitchen, tomatoes and pickles stored on a shelf out their original containers in the refrigerated walk-in unit, were not dated as to when they were opened or how long they had been opened. -The floors near the food preparation table, the electrical floor outlet near the steam table and floors surrounding the steam table were greasy, visibly and to the touch. -There were two pieces of juice dispensing equipment, both with one nozzle connected to each to each of them, dispensing beverages of orange juice, a lemon beverage, cranberry juice, nectar honey and water. These nozzles were sticky with multi-colored debris on the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Nutrition and Dietary Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Ecited before2020-03-09 · tag F0908 — failed to keep essential equipment working — pattern
    Keep all essential equipment working safely.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure that the facility's kitchen range hood (an open metal enclosure over cooking surfaces through which air is drawn in from the surrounding spaces to exhaust heat and grease, and to control the flow of rising hot air into the range hood and filter grease) exhaust fan was in operational and functional condition. By having a faulty exhaust system the facility is placing in jeopardy the entire kitchen staff of smoke inhalation and the risk of grease building up in the hood creating a fire thus, affecting and the facility residents. The facility census was 164 residents. 1. Observations on 3/4/20 between 5:05 A.M. and 1:10 P.M. in the kitchen, showed the kitchen range hood's exhaust system non-functional and non-operational. During an interview on 3/4/20 at 6:05 A.M., the Dietary [NAME] said that he/she had been working at the facility for approximately two to three weeks and since that time, the range hood exhaust fan has not worked. During an interview on 3/4/20 at 6:10 A.M., the Maintenance Director said…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Environmental Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-09 · tag F0604 — failed to not use physical restraints improperly — isolated
    Ensure that each resident is free from the use of physical restraints, unless needed for medical treatment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #121) was free from restraints out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 164 residents. Record review of the facility's Restraints policy revised 2/2019 showed: -Residents shall be provided an environment that is restraint free, unless a restraint is necessary to treat a medical symptom in which case the least restrictive measure shall be used. -There must be a physician's order for the use of a restraint, including the medical symptom, frequency, type of restraint, release protocols and a plan for reduction. -Before any restraint is used, the licensed nurse would verify that informed consent has been obtained from the resident/responsible party, and education was provided including the risks and benefits of the restraint. 1. Record review of Resident #121's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] and had the following diagnoses: -Cognitive communication deficit…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Freedom from Abuse, Neglect, and Exploitation Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-09 · tag F0641 — isolated
    Ensure each resident receives an accurate assessment.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to accurately complete Minimum Data Set (MDS - a federally mandated assessment tool required to be completed by facility staff for care planning) assessments for two sampled residents (Residents #25 and #367) out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 164 residents. 1. Record review of Resident #25's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the resident's Telephone Order Sheet (TOS) dated 12/3/19, showed an order for the resident to be evaluated by hospice (end of life care) services. Record review of the resident's hospice agreement showed: -He/she was admitted to hospice 12/4/19. -His/her admitting diagnosis was heart failure. Record review of the resident's Nurses' Progress Note dated 12/5/19, showed he/she was admitted to hospice. Record review of the resident's Significant Change MDS dated [DATE], showed he/she did not have a condition or chronic disease that may result in a life…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-09 · tag F0655 — isolated
    Create and put into place a plan for meeting the resident's most immediate needs within 48 hours of being admitted
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to provide residents and their representative with a summary of the baseline care plan for two sampled residents (Resident #50 and #126) out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 164 residents. Record review of the facility's Care Planning Policy dated February 2019, showed: -The facility will develop a person-centered baseline care plan for each resident within 48 hours of admission. -Once the baseline care plan is completed, the facility must provide the resident and/or the resident's representative with a written summary of the baseline care plan. -The baseline care plan summary must be provided to the resident and/or the resident's representative by the time the Comprehensive Care Plan is completed. -Care plan summaries should be provided in a language and manner that the resident and/or resident's representative can understand. -The medical record must contain evidence that the summary was given to the resident and/or resident's…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-09 · tag F0656 — failed to write and follow a full care plan — isolated
    Develop and implement a complete care plan that meets all the resident's needs, with timetables and actions that can be measured.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to develop and implement a comprehensive person centered care plan for one sampled resident (Resident #126), out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 164 residents. Record review of the facility's Care Planning policy, revised February 2019, showed: -A comprehensive person-centered Care Plan would be developed for each resident. -Each resident's Comprehensive Care Plan would describe: --Services that were to be furnished to attain or maintain the resident's highest practicable physical, mental and psychosocial well-being. --Any services that would be required, but were not provided due to the resident's exercise of rights, which includes the right to refuse treatment. -The Care Plan would include measurable objectives and timetables to meet a resident's medical, nursing, mental and psychosocial needs. 1. Record review of Resident #126's face sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE]. Record review of the…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Resident Assessment and Care Planning Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-09 · tag F0686 — failed to prevent and treat pressure sores (bedsores) — isolated
    Provide appropriate pressure ulcer care and prevent new ulcers from developing.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on interview and record review, the facility failed to ensure a resident with a Stage IV (Full thickness tissue loss with exposed bone, tendon or muscle. Slough or eschar may be present on some parts of the wound bed. Often includes undermining and tunneling) pressure ulcer (localized injury to the skin and/or underlying tissue usually over a bony prominence, as a result of pressure, or pressure in combination with shear and/or friction) remained clean, free of stool, and coved with a dressing per physician's orders; to ensure a resident's Negative Pressure Wound Therapy (NPWT - also known as wound VAC - vacuum-assisted closure - an high level wound treatment for chronic or complicated wounds consisting of a portable vacuum device to create negative pressure and a specialized sealed dressing with a drain and reservoir for collection of drainage and wound debris to aid in wound healing) was applied to the resident's Stage IV pressure ulcer per the resident's physician's order for one sampled resident…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · Dcited before2020-03-09 · tag F0690 — failed to manage incontinence, catheters, and urinary infections — isolated
    Provide appropriate care for residents who are continent or incontinent of bowel/bladder, appropriate catheter care, and appropriate care to prevent urinary tract infections.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to ensure one sampled resident (Resident #143) was provided adequate incontinence care when he/she was visibly wet, had puddles under his/her wheelchair, and there was a strong urine odor in his/her room out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 164 residents. Record review of the facility's policy titled Perineal Care (washing the genitals and anal area) dated February 2019 showed: -The purpose was to maintain cleanliness of the genital area, to reduce odor, and to prevent infection of skin breakdown. -Perineal care was provided as part of a resident's hygienic program, a minimum of once daily and per resident need. 1. Record review of Resident #143's face sheet showed he/she admitted tot he facility on 2/9/20 with diagnoses including: -End stage renal disease (the last stage of chronic kidney disease). -Chronic kidney disease (your kidneys are damaged and can't filter blood the way they should). Record review of the resident's admission Minimum Data Set (MDS-a federally mandated assessment tool…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-09 · tag F0740 — failed to provide behavioral / mental-health care — isolated
    Ensure each resident must receive and the facility must provide necessary behavioral health care and services.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview, and record review, the facility failed to meet the behavioral needs for one sampled resident (Resident #85) who had an increase in his/her depression indicators out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 164 residents. Record review of the facility's Social Services Program policy updated 2/2019 showed: -The facility needed to provide medically related social services. -The director of social services and/or designee would meet with the resident to evaluate the psychosocial needs of the resident. -The resident needed to be assessed for negative impact on psychosocial development including anxiety, coping ability, depression, and anger. 1. Record review of Resident #85's Face Sheet showed he/she was admitted to the facility on [DATE] with the following diagnoses: -Dementia (a progressive organic mental disorder characterized by chronic personality disintegration, confusion, disorientation, stupor, deterioration of intellectual capacity and function, and impairment of…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction
  • Potential for harm · D2020-03-09 · tag F0742 — isolated
    Provide the appropriate treatment and services to a resident who displays or is diagnosed with mental disorder or psychosocial adjustment difficulty, or who has a history of trauma and/or post-traumatic stress disorder.
    What the surveyor found here — an excerpt from the official record, may be distressing

    NOTE- TERMS IN BRACKETS HAVE BEEN EDITED TO PROTECT CONFIDENTIALITY Based on observation, interview and record review, the facility failed to adequately assess one sampled resident (Resident #154) for ongoing appropriate interventions related to the resident's behaviors; to complete a thorough investigation of an incident and provide appropriate monitoring at the time of the incident that occurred on 2/26/20; to notify the physician of one closed record resident's (Resident #85) mental status changes with increasing behaviors and failed to adequately monitor the resident as the behaviors increased out of 32 sampled residents. The facility census was 164 residents. Record review of the facility's Behavior-Management policy revised 2/2019 showed: -The key components were: --Identifying residents whose behaviors may pose a risk to self or others. --Develop practical care strategies based on assessed needs. --Implementing a behavioral management program. --On-going assessment and monitoring, and evaluation of the effectiveness of the behavioral management program including…

    This is the beginning of the surveyor’s statement, cut to keep the page readable — the full 2567 continues past this point and often ends with the findings that matter most, such as whether an immediate jeopardy was removed before the surveyors left. The complete statement of deficiencies is a public record: request it from your state survey agency, or ask the home for its 2567 and plan of correction — it must make them available to residents and families.

    Quality of Life and Care Deficiencies · Deficient, Provider has date of correction

“Cited before” means this same F-tag appears on at least one other survey date in the record we hold — counting complaint investigations as well as standard surveys, with no time limit. It is our own read of the data, not CMS’s: CMS uses repeat deficiency as a formal term tied to consecutive standard surveys, and that is a narrower test than this one. A tag marked here may or may not meet it.

Worried about a resident here? There are three different people you can turn to, and they do different jobs:
  • Long-Term Care Ombudsman — a free, confidential advocate for the resident. They act only with the resident’s consent and work to resolve the problem. Find yours at theconsumervoice.org/get_help.
  • Adult Protective Services — the state agency that investigates suspected abuse, neglect, or exploitation of a vulnerable adult. Not sure of your state’s APS number? The federal Eldercare Locator will route you: 1-800-677-1116 or eldercare.acl.gov.
  • State survey agency — the regulator that licenses and inspects the home. Every state has an official nursing-home complaint line and most take complaints online; the Ombudsman or Eldercare Locator can connect you.
Not sure where to start, or need other help? Dial 2-1-1 for local resources — and if a call is hard or impossible for you, many local 211s also take a text (send your ZIP code to 898-211) or a web chat at 211.org; both vary by area, and 211.org will show what yours offers. Deaf or hard of hearing: dial 711 for the telecommunications relay service, then any number above. In an emergency, call 911.
It is illegal for a facility to retaliate against a resident or family for reporting a concern: federal law gives a resident the right to voice grievances — to the home or to any outside agency — without discrimination or reprisal (42 CFR §483.10(j)(1)). You may report anonymously.

Fines & penalties

$20,787 in federal fines across 1 penalty.

  • $20,787 — penalty dated 2024-02-01

Dates are the dates CMS records the penalty, not the date of the conduct behind it. CMS publishes penalties on a rolling window, so this is what is currently on the public file — not the home’s lifetime history, and an older fine may attach to a problem that has since been corrected. The amounts are as imposed: the CMS file does not record whether a penalty was appealed, reduced, or paid, so we don’t say. Ask the home what each one was for and what changed since.

Part of a chain

This home belongs to OPCO SKILLED MANAGEMENT — 66 facilities. Here is how its ratings compare with the chain’s average across all its homes: See the whole chain — ratings, flags, fines and finances →

RatingThis homeChain avg
Overall 1 of 52.3-1.3 vs chain
Health inspection 1 of 52.2-1.2 vs chain
Staffing 1 of 51.7-0.7 vs chain
Quality measures 3 of 54.3-1.3 vs chain
The other 65 homes this chain runs (chain average 2.3★, per CMS)
1 of 5Bluebird Wellness And RehabilitationSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Brentwood Place ThreeDallas, TX 1 of 5Broadway Nursing & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 1 of 5Cameron Nursing CenterCameron, MO 1 of 5Casa Arena Healthcare LLCAlamogordo, NM 1 of 5Casa Maria HealthcareRoswell, NM 1 of 5Forest Park Nursing & RehabilitationDallas, TX 1 of 5Fort Worth Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Glenview Wellness & RehabilitationNorth Richland Hills, TX 1 of 5Highland Pines Nursing HomeLongview, TX 1 of 5Ivy Creek Wellness & RehabilitationWaco, TX 1 of 5Las Cruces Village Nursing & Rehabilitation LLCLas Cruces, NM 1 of 5Magnolia Wellness CenterSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Maple Grove Wellness & RehabilitationFenton, MO 1 of 5Mineola Gardens Wellness & RehabilitationMineola, TX 1 of 5Pine Grove ManorSaint Louis, MO 1 of 5Rehab Of Kansas City SouthKansas City, MO 1 of 5The Hillcrest Of North DallasDallas, TX 1 of 5West Side Campus Of CareWhite Settlement, TX 1 of 5Willow Ridge Wellness & RehabilitationFort Worth, TX 1 of 5Willowcreek Wellness & RehabilitationFlorissant, MO 2 of 5Arbor Lake Nursing & Rehabilitation, LLCFort Worth, TX 2 of 5Aztec HealthcareAztec, NM 2 of 5Betty Dare Wellness & Rehabilitation LLCAlamogordo, NM 2 of 5Blue Springs Wellness & RehabilitationBlue Springs, MO 2 of 5Cypress Springs Wellness & RehabilitationMount Vernon, TX 2 of 5Fiesta Park Wellness & RehabilitationAlbuquerque, NM 2 of 5Hilltop At Blue River, TheKansas City, MO 2 of 5La Vida Buena HealthcareLas Vegas, NM 2 of 5Los Alamos Wellness & RehabilitationLos Alamos, NM 2 of 5McGregor Wellness & RehabilitationMc Gregor, TX 2 of 5Monarch Springs Wellness & RehabilitationUniversity City, MO 2 of 5Northrise Wellness & RehabilitationLas Cruces, NM 2 of 5Prescott Valley Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott Valley, AZ 2 of 5Prescott Village Nursing & RehabilitationPrescott, AZ 2 of 5Rehabilitation Center Of Independence, TheIndependence, MO 2 of 5San Antonio Wellness & RehabilitationSan Antonio, TX 2 of 5Skyline Nursing CenterDallas, TX 2 of 5Sunny Springs Nursing & RehabSulphur Springs, TX 2 of 5White Acres Wellness & RehabilitationEl Paso, TX

Showing 40 of 65; lowest-rated first.

A home rated well below its chain’s average can signal local problems; a chain with a low average across the board is a bigger pattern worth researching. CMS chain data under-reports private-equity and REIT ownership, so treat this as a floor, not the full picture.

Who owns this facility

Owner / managerTypeRoleSince
EL DORADO NURSING AND REHABILITATION LLCOrganizationDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
CALIBER ADVISORS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
CRESTVIEW TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
FIRST SWEETZER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
HATTERAS INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
RIMPAU HOLDINGS TRUSTOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
SASEM INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationINDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTERESTsince 12/12/2022
810 E WALNUT STREET MO LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
EMERALD PROPERTY PARTNERS LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
GIBRALTAR TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
MONTGOMERY SKY TRUSTOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
OZARK HEALTHCARE REALTY LLCOrganization5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST; ADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
GARETZ, DAVIDIndividualOPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROLsince 12/12/2022
HAGINS, ELIZABETHIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
KAPLAN, ESTHERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
KAPLAN, MORDECHAIIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
KAPLAN, MOSHAIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
STERNSHEIN, JENNIFERIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
UNGER, JEFFREYIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
ZIMMERMAN, CAROLINEIndividualINDIVIDUAL IS AN OWNER, PARTNER OR TRUSTEE OF ANY ADP OF THE SNFsince 04/30/2025
ESDOV INVESTMENTS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
JUBILEE MASTER HOLDINGS LLCOrganizationADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
COFFMAN-WILLIAMS, CHARMAINEIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022
TADAKAMALLA, SRINATHIndividualADP OF THE SNFsince 12/12/2022

CMS files one row per role, so the 31 rows in the source record cover these 24 parties — each is shown once here with every role it holds. Nothing is omitted. The source lists no ownership percentage for any of them — PECOS records a share only for equity interests, not for board or management roles.

14 organizational owners listed — a facility can be part of a larger chain. CMS ownership data is known to under-report private-equity and REIT ties; treat as a starting point.

Follow the money — this home’s finances

Where a nursing home’s revenue comes from and where it goes — including money paid to companies under the same ownership. Most consumer sites never show this; we reproduce it straight from the Medicare cost report.

$17.6M
Net patient revenuemost recent cost report
+15.6%
Operating marginrevenue minus expenses
$4.2M
Related-party expense29% of expenses
Who pays — share of resident-days
Medicaid 82%Medicare 6%Other / private 12%

About 82% of this home’s resident-days are paid by Medicaid, which reimburses well below the cost of care in most states. Heavily Medicaid-dependent homes run on thinner budgets — a context worth holding next to the staffing and inspection record, not a fault in itself. This home reported $4.2M paid to related parties — landlords or management companies under common ownership — equal to about 29% of its total expenses. Money routed to affiliated companies can leave a home’s own books looking lean while owners still profit; it is the mechanism regulators watch most closely in private-equity and REIT deals.

Source: CMS Healthcare Provider Cost Reporting Information System (HCRIS), Medicare cost report Form CMS-2540 · fiscal year 2024. Facilities self-file these reports; figures are unaudited and a year or two behind. A home with no Medicare cost report on file shows no figures here.

Cost & finances

$265per resident / day
operating cost
$8,044per month
≈ monthly operating cost
$313per day
avg. revenue, all payers

Straight from this home’s Medicare cost report (CMS, FY2024). These are its operating economics — what it costs to run per resident-day and what it collects on average across Medicare, Medicaid, and private pay — not a private-pay quote. Your out-of-pocket cost depends on payer and room type, so ask the facility directly; a higher operating cost can reflect richer staffing or a sicker population. The cost-of-care planner shows regional benchmarks by care type.

What families pay in MO

Paying with Medicaid

This is a Medicare- and Medicaid-certified nursing home, so it can accept Medicaid for long-term care — like nearly all U.S. nursing homes. The private-pay figures below are what families without Medicaid pay; once a resident qualifies for Medicaid, out-of-pocket cost for covered nursing-home care is typically close to $0 (almost all of their income goes to the home as their share of the cost; they keep a small personal needs allowance — for clothing, haircuts, a phone — and Medicaid pays the rest). The amount of that allowance is set by each state. Confirm Medicaid-bed availability with the home, and see the Missouri Medicaid page.

Typical monthly cost in Missouri
$6,741/mo
Nursing home (semi-private)
$7,604/mo
Nursing home (private)
$5,400/mo
Assisted living

Median private-pay cost, CareScout (Genworth) 2025 Cost of Care Survey — a regional midpoint, not any single community’s rate. Private rooms and higher care levels cost more; ask for a current quote. Project your own in the cost-of-care planner.

Every figure above is reproduced from the CMS Provider Data Catalog (a public record), from the CMS extract processed 2026-08-01 — CMS provider number 265727. CMS refreshes its data monthly, and the star rating rests on the last standard inspection — dated 2024-11-25, which can lag current conditions. Staffing hours are CMS PBJ CY2026Q1 (Jan–Mar 2026). Check this record against the government’s own page for it: this home on Medicare Care Compare ↗ — the authoritative source, and the place to confirm anything here before you act on it. How we present it →

Not a government site. Eldercare Lens is not affiliated with, endorsed by, or authorized by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Medicare, or any government agency. The star ratings, citations, and inspection wording on this page are reproduced from the public CMS record; the plain-English summaries, tiers, and comparisons around them are ours. We do not speak for CMS, and CMS has not reviewed this page. For the official record, go to Medicare Care Compare. How we’re funded →

Are you this operator? If the record here is out of date, or misses what you have since fixed, tell us and we will look: hello@eldercarelens.com. We reproduce the public CMS record and cannot change what it says — corrections to the underlying data go through CMS and your state survey agency — but we will correct anything we have got wrong about it, and we will say so on the page.

What to do next